If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WPTV)   You know those $100 shoes you bought to help you tone your butt and lose weight? Never mind   (wptv.com) divider line 191
    More: Fail, Skechers Shape, Federal Trade Commission, Skechers, marketing executives  
•       •       •

16850 clicks; posted to Main » on 16 May 2012 at 5:58 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



191 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-05-16 11:46:42 PM
Sybarite: Everybody wants a shortcut.


I don't really see how those are a shortcut. You've still got to get out and walk or run.

In theory, they're like a curl bar or an ab bench. You've still got to do the exercise. These just claimed to adjust your stride such that your butt and thighs did more work than in traditional shoes... no different than adjusting your grip when lifting weights to direct stress to a different range or set of muscles.

In fact, one of the girls at my office was wearing these for a while and said it was sort of like walking in sand... so rather than a shortcut, it was even more strenuous than regular shoes.
 
2012-05-16 11:47:17 PM
penthesilea: Those things aren't cheap you know. Months went by and no weight lost. I actually gained weight and some major 'digestive' issues too.

Walk it off.
 
2012-05-16 11:48:23 PM
kab: /folks were running far before sneakers were invented. Hard to believe, but true.

On those rolling asphalt plains and concrete hills of yore, yes, I remember that part of anthropology well.
 
2012-05-16 11:49:33 PM
Nadie_AZ: GGracie: I love my rockers - as I call them. They remind me of hockey skates. I didn't get them expecting any butt miracles. I got them because they are fun to rock back and forth in when I walk. They are bouncy too :-) Skechers are my favorite brand of shoes.

If people were dumb enough to think that simply wearing a pair of shoes would do the trick then they deserved to be tricked. You have to put the motor in gear if you want to get somewhere.

GG! Holy crap! (see my profile)


HA! Hiya!! send an email, I have missed you :-)
 
2012-05-16 11:57:54 PM
While you have to be something of an idiot to fall for such things, companies that make false claims like this should be given one chance to screw up, be fined a bunch, then if it happens a second time, shut down. If you are selling something dont make claims that are not backed by solid science. This is the same issue I have with the pro-weed forces. If you want to claim weed is usefull in treating a particular condition, fine. Treat it like any other pharmaceutical. Set up randomized clinical trials, etc. Then if the claim holds up it can be marketed, subject to standard FDA manufacturing controls (sterilization, packaging/labeling, quality controls, etc).
 
2012-05-17 12:06:04 AM
I love my MBTs. They're great for trade shows. After a day of working the floor at CES, my leg muscles are a little sore, but my joints don't hurt. No ankle or knee pain, like I would get with other shoes.
 
2012-05-17 12:42:00 AM
My podiatrist told me to try them for what might be planar fasciatis (there's been trouble in figuring out what exactly is farked up about my feet).
They actually do help me a little bit, so maybe they do have some purpose.

(This was something like the 5th "special" pair of shoes I've tried)
 
2012-05-17 01:52:35 AM
serial_crusher: I'm still a believer in these things though:
[www.vibramfivefingers.com image 237x197]


I hate those things. They're a favorite of snobby, Volvo driving, middle-aged, yoga Moms
 
2012-05-17 02:17:50 AM
octopied: I took a look at them and a couple similar varieties including super expensive MBT shoes. I concluded very quickly that the supposed "benefits" would be outweighed by whatever injuries I'd sustain once I lost my balance in a pair. Using non rockered Timberland soft soled hikers for all my walking, thanks.

I bought a pair of MBT's from a shoe store attached to my mom's podiatrist office about 6 or 7 years ago -- before the Sketchers fad hit. I am a nurse and they are my work shoes. They were farkin' expensive, but I'm wearing them still and I love them. I have a history of knee and back issues, and I'm convinced keeping the weight on the arch of my foot (the strongest part of the foot) has reduced the number of trips I've had to make to the chiropractor to keep getting through my 12 hour shifts.

I don't think they've done anything to shape up my butt, but they definitely use different muscles in your legs than normal shoes do. I remember feeling it in my calves the first few times I wore these shoes. In short, I'm not any skinnier but my knees and back don't hurt either.
 
2012-05-17 02:19:21 AM
Derkins: Ambivalence: I just got them becuase they're comfortable. Unfortunatley they also have laces so I hardly ever wear them. (I hate laces)

I got them for comfort too. At a job where I'm on my feet all day, they were like walking on marshmallows.
As for toning my butt, not so much.


I got the Sketchers "work" shoes. Just as comfy, support my feet really well for 8+ hours of standing on tile-over-concrete floors, and don't cost NEARLY as much as the Shape-ups.
 
2012-05-17 02:56:09 AM
People will spend any amount of money to take the easy route, which then doesn't lead anywhere. This is news?

To lose weight: Eat less, eat good quality food, and exercise. Fundamental life changes, not quick fixes. Not gadgets and gimmicks (other than perhaps a pair of properly fitted running shoes), not programs that charge you money to track what you eat (plenty of free weight loss sites, apps, and support groups available), not invasive surgical procedures.

It's simple. Not necessarily easy, but simple. And there are no shortcuts.
 
2012-05-17 03:09:43 AM
jtr: As a guy who has a fetish for girls wearing hot sneakers, I applaud the FTC. Goddamm those things were hideous!!!
As soon as the Reebok lawsuit hit court I KNEW Skechers was doomed and I've been biding my time till the ugliest sneakers on the planet were revealed to be what they were: ugly ass lies!
Rant over. Feeling quite vindicated.


What is a "hot sneaker"?

Seriously. I'm interested.
 
2012-05-17 03:12:42 AM
Begoggle: serial_crusher: Nofun McKilljoy: serial_crusher: I'm still a believer in these things though:
[www.vibramfivefingers.com image 237x197]

thats because youre an idiot.

/ marathon runner
//would NEVER use those

Bwahaha, marathons. Do you have one of those 26.2 stickers on your car?

/for the record I usually don't do more than about 15 miles in the VFFs. Done 30 in them a couple times and it was a bit much.

Vibrams + 26.2 sticker = the hippest hipster that ever hipped.
I can't stand the hipness.


Since when has marathon running, or running in general, become the mark of a hipster? It's way too mainstream.
 
2012-05-17 03:17:39 AM
Jubeebee: what_now: serial_crusher: I'm still a believer in these things though:

those are great- if you have a perfect gate, have never sustained an injury to your hips, legs, knees, spine or feet, and you haven't been running with built up sneakers for long.

If you're in your late 20s and have been active all life? Those things are more likely to be harmful.

You have to adapt to them gradually. After two+ decades in traditional shoes, your feet can't adapt to barefoot style in a month or two. But if you're patient with them, a lot of those nagging things work themselves out.

My girlfriend had flat feet her whole life. After a year of gradually going from normal shoes to Nike Frees to Vibrams, she has arches and her feet don't hurt when she stands anymore.


Whaaat? I'm under the impression that arches are a static, genetic feature of one's body. Is this not the case?
 
2012-05-17 05:02:46 AM
kab: Nofun McKilljoy: thats because youre an idiot.

/ marathon runner heel striker
//would NEVER use those

FTFY.

/folks were running far before sneakers were invented. Hard to believe, but true.


And unless they were living between the tropics they were also covering their feet.

Just because you're wearing shoes doesn't mean you're a heel striker. And just because you're wearing the ugliest shoes since Crocs doesn't mean you're not heel striking

If you really want to simulate barefoot running and still protect your feet ignore the Vibram hype and buy a pair of moccasins.
 
2012-05-17 05:43:29 AM
belhade: I'm another disciple of Vibram.



I got them in December and wore them around the house all winter to get used to them. Of course, winter lasted about two weeks this year and I wore them out constantly whenever it was at least dry. I love these things so much I want to get a pair of black kangaroo-leather KSOs to wear for work.


You put your shoes up on furniture? Ew.
 
2012-05-17 06:23:32 AM
So................is the FTC going after the Shake Weight people as well?
 
2012-05-17 06:50:51 AM
CommieTaoist: While I am normally all for consumer protection, anyone who was stupid enough to buy those expecting to lose weight or get a killer ass sort of deserves to lose their money.

If it's not okay to blame the victim for suffering rape, why is it okay to blame the victim for suffering fraud?
 
2012-05-17 07:29:14 AM
zato_ichi: Just really, REALLY farking gullible.

Most people are. People of a certain upbringing/background/mindset don't generally question authority, they take it for granted that the nice person on TV (in a store, behind the kiosk, etc.) is the fountain of all knowledge on something and has a duty to be impartial; after all they wouldn't be pushing the product (or news story) in that light if they didn't honestly believe in it's capabilities.

As you've discovered this gets such people in to a lot of trouble
 
2012-05-17 08:21:57 AM
meanmutton: Sybarite: Everybody wants a shortcut.

And, so? I've never understood this hypocritical condemnation of people who want things easier and quicker. What's wrong with that?

What, do we all do math long-hand, use a manual typewriter to type up your reports, send hand-written memos to coworkers, slaughter our own chickens, walk a dozen miles to work, fill out our tax forms on paper, etc.?



There will never be any shortcut to being fit. There's only self-control and hard work, no matter what the ads and infomercials tell you. It's why so many workout DVDs and so many pieces of "miracle" fitness equipment are gathering dust in a corner. It turns out for any of them to work you actually need to control what you put in your mouth and discipline yourself to regular strenuous exercise. Even the apparently immediate reduction strategies like liposuction usually end in failure, because the person hasn't changed the way they behave.
 
2012-05-17 08:22:13 AM
relaxitsjustme: serial_crusher: I'm still a believer in these things though:
[www.vibramfivefingers.com image 237x197]

I hate those things. They're a favorite of snobby, Volvo driving, middle-aged, yoga Moms


I beg to differ. My wife and I are thinking of switching to minimalist running. Still reading up on it though. My wife's been having knee problems for awhile and minimalist running is supposed to alleviate that problem. She's only 26. While I don't have issues with my knees (just my back), I'm always up for trying something new.

We are just blindly buying Vibrams just to have them. I think they are pretty ugly myself, and expensive. I have a couple of coworkers that do minimalist running and say it's definitely better than normal running striking with your heal first.

We'll see though.

/who pays $100 for sketchers?
//I really want Crocs to go away forever
 
2012-05-17 08:23:01 AM
We are NOT just blindly buying Vibrams just to have them

/dammit, need an edit button.
 
2012-05-17 08:27:27 AM
kemosabe: relaxitsjustme: serial_crusher: I'm still a believer in these things though:
[www.vibramfivefingers.com image 237x197]

I hate those things. They're a favorite of snobby, Volvo driving, middle-aged, yoga Moms

I beg to differ. My wife and I are thinking of switching to minimalist running. Still reading up on it though. My wife's been having knee problems for awhile and minimalist running is supposed to alleviate that problem. She's only 26. While I don't have issues with my knees (just my back), I'm always up for trying something new.

We are just blindly buying Vibrams just to have them. I think they are pretty ugly myself, and expensive. I have a couple of coworkers that do minimalist running and say it's definitely better than normal running striking with your heal first.

We'll see though.

/who pays $100 for sketchers?
//I really want Crocs to go away forever


Check out the Merrell trail-running/minimalist shoes or the NB minimus as well. Both offer a more traditional shoe look with the same basic design and purpose as the Vibrams. The Merrell has a nice roomy toe box. The NB aren't completely flat, they have a small rise to the heel. For me, the Vibrams just fit my foot shape better.
 
2012-05-17 08:44:53 AM
This thread might be dead, but I figured I'd ask if anyone has a good urban walking shoe they could recommend. For "I'm walking around 3 miles a day to do errands and stuff daily" not "I'm gonna go for a power walk".
 
2012-05-17 09:34:47 AM
theorellior: kab: /folks were running far before sneakers were invented. Hard to believe, but true.

On those rolling asphalt plains and concrete hills of yore, yes, I remember that part of anthropology well.


Because exposed rock and baked clay are that dissimilar? We've been running a damn long time on a huge array of surfaces. Including hard ones.

If you're running correctly, what you're running on doesn't matter. The muscle absorbs the force. Padding is only important when you heel strike, because that's what prevents you from feeling the searing pain that's supposed to warn you that THAT'S NOT HOW YOUR BODY IS DESIGNED TO RUN. When you heel strike, the energy of landing each stride goes straight into your skeletal structure- right up the leg into the knee.
 
2012-05-17 10:19:17 AM
ZipSplat: Whaaat? I'm under the impression that arches are a static, genetic feature of one's body. Is this not the case?

It is not the case. Your foot is a mess of small bones held in place by hundreds of muscles and tendons. If your foot muscles have atrophied, they can't support the bones properly and your arches collapse. If you build those muscles back up, over time they will reshape your feet, generally making your foot wider and shorter as the arch develops and your toe splay increases.

The feet of people who have been barefoot their entire lives look like leaf springs. Take a look at prosthetics for running (like you'd see at the Special Olympics) and let me know if you think that's a coincidence.
 
2012-05-17 10:22:39 AM
theorellior: kab: /folks were running far before sneakers were invented. Hard to believe, but true.

On those rolling asphalt plains and concrete hills of yore, yes, I remember that part of anthropology well.


Nobody's making you run on roads today either. Go find a trail.
 
2012-05-17 10:30:32 AM
cptjeff: If you're running correctly, what you're running on doesn't matter.

serial_crusher: Nobody's making you run on roads today either. Go find a trail.

Actually, I hate running. I'm glad my ancestors invented bicycles. I'd hate to try to pedal in Vibrams, although I'm certain there's a fixie rider out there doing just that as we speak.
 
2012-05-17 10:51:43 AM
jingks: belhade: I'm another disciple of Vibram.



I got them in December and wore them around the house all winter to get used to them. Of course, winter lasted about two weeks this year and I wore them out constantly whenever it was at least dry. I love these things so much I want to get a pair of black kangaroo-leather KSOs to wear for work.

You put your shoes up on furniture? Ew.


They were brand new; I'd just gotten them delivered.

Ed Finnerty: belhade: I'm another disciple of Vibram.

[lh3.googleusercontent.com image 307x512]

What's with the socks?

/Black socks go better with sandals


Like I said, I got them in December. Even with the ultrathin Injinji toe-socks I was wearing my Vibrams outside when it was 30-40 degrees. And a little padding when getting used to them doesn't hurt either.
 
2012-05-17 10:54:58 AM
Back when I exercised as part of a bizarre college mating ritual, I would always jog around the campus on my toes, never letting my heels strike the ground. Luckily I had already paired with my mate before I did that. Anyway, my calves and ass rocked because of it.
 
2012-05-17 11:53:07 AM
cptjeff:

If you're running correctly, what you're running on doesn't matter. The muscle absorbs the force. Padding is only important when you heel strike, because that's what prevents you from feeling the searing pain that's supposed to warn you that THAT'S NOT HOW YOUR BODY IS DESIGNED TO RUN. When you heel strike, the energy of landing each stride goes straight into your skeletal structure- right up the leg into the knee.


Heel striking is a form issue, not a footwear issue. A person can run and not heel strike without wearing Vibrams.
 
2012-05-17 01:05:40 PM
Most shoes promote heel-striking, with raised heels and rigid soles. At the very least they don't allow for mid-foot striking.
 
2012-05-17 03:08:34 PM
my wife wears these, she blew out her knee in the military and she says that these are the only shoes that do not make her knee hurt on long walks
 
2012-05-17 04:32:38 PM
belhade: Most shoes promote heel-striking, with raised heels and rigid soles. At the very least they don't allow for mid-foot striking.

Carefully watch somebody walk while wearing Vibram FF. They still heel strike.

Don't want to heel strike? Lean forward at the ankles, keep your back straight and don't put your foot down ahead of your knee. Ta da! No heel strike and I just saved you from spending $100 to look like another marleting sucker.
 
2012-05-17 05:46:21 PM
I've never actually seen Vibrams marketed until I was already looking for them. And I don't pay $100...
 
2012-05-17 08:22:58 PM
What does a toned butt look like?
 
2012-05-17 08:30:52 PM
belhade: I've never actually seen Vibrams marketed until I was already looking for them. And I don't pay $100...

Don't take it personally. I just think it's funny that people are touting Vibram FF in a thread about how shoe company marketing departments lie to their customers.
 
2012-05-17 08:32:12 PM
deconstructed: my wife wears these, she blew out her took an arrow to the knee in the military and she says that these are the only shoes that do not make her knee hurt on long walks

FTF meme
 
2012-05-17 09:10:47 PM
relaxitsjustme: belhade: I've never actually seen Vibrams marketed until I was already looking for them. And I don't pay $100...

Don't take it personally. I just think it's funny that people are touting Vibram FF in a thread about how shoe company marketing departments lie to their customers.


Is it lying to say that walking barefoot is better for you (in most cases) than walking in built-up shoes?
 
2012-05-18 04:36:32 AM
belhade: relaxitsjustme: belhade: I've never actually seen Vibrams marketed until I was already looking for them. And I don't pay $100...

Don't take it personally. I just think it's funny that people are touting Vibram FF in a thread about how shoe company marketing departments lie to their customers.

Is it lying to say that walking barefoot is better for you (in most cases) than walking in built-up shoes?


No it's not lying but walking in Vibrams isn't walking barefoot either. Seriously, watch somebody walk (not running, that's a different story) wearing them, they still heel strike. If you really wanted to get close to to walking barefoot but still protect the sole of your foot wear flip-flops or moccasins. Both of those options will allow your toes to move more freely and splay out more than the VFF.
 
2012-05-18 08:14:04 AM
relaxitsjustme: belhade: relaxitsjustme: belhade: I've never actually seen Vibrams marketed until I was already looking for them. And I don't pay $100...

Don't take it personally. I just think it's funny that people are touting Vibram FF in a thread about how shoe company marketing departments lie to their customers.

Is it lying to say that walking barefoot is better for you (in most cases) than walking in built-up shoes?

No it's not lying but walking in Vibrams isn't walking barefoot either. Seriously, watch somebody walk (not running, that's a different story) wearing them, they still heel strike. If you really wanted to get close to to walking barefoot but still protect the sole of your foot wear flip-flops or moccasins. Both of those options will allow your toes to move more freely and splay out more than the VFF.


You've obviously never actually worn Vibrams yourself.
 
Displayed 41 of 191 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report