If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post)   "Repeal and Replace" replaced by "Fark it. We're not going to do something hard like health care reform"   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 117
    More: Followup, Fark, healthcare reform, repeal  
•       •       •

5132 clicks; posted to Politics » on 16 May 2012 at 3:33 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



117 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-05-16 04:21:56 PM
Jubeebee: Serious Black: Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Republicans don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?

Part of the problem is that while Obamacare is an evil socialist death panel plot, the individual reforms in the Affordable Care Act are actually quite popular when people are polled about them a la carte.

The Republicans can't repeal Obamacare without getting rid of all of the things people like about the ACA, because reality sucks sometimes.


If you ignore the people who don't think the act went far enough, it is actually quite popular.
 
2012-05-16 04:22:24 PM
Did anyone ever think the current Republican Party had plans to replace Obamacare with anything other than boot straps, that is, the boot straps you should already have if you're worth anything at all?
 
2012-05-16 04:23:40 PM
Jackson Herring: Smackledorfer: Also, bsrb? Really?

I swear people around here have the memory of goldfish when it comes to recognizing people's posting styles


Honestly, I'm kind of wondering if relcec had a stroke recently. We used to have great discussions about what we needed to do with the health care system, and then a few months ago, he started jumping down my throat constantly about how I want to slobber all over President Obama's dick and carry water for the Democrats.
 
2012-05-16 04:25:41 PM
AverageJoe77: Diogenes: cman: Considering the attitudes of the SCOTUS members when this came for debate, the GOP does not have to worry about repealing it. SCOTUS is gonna do that for them

Thereby paving the way for the version we wanted in the first place - with a single-payer structure.

Am I crazy in thinking this was Obama's plan all along? He's been pretty good at playing the Republicans in the long game.


I wonder myself. But I hesitate to mention it often because it opens me up to accusations of (my admitted favorite fallacy), post hoc ergo propter hoc.
 
2012-05-16 04:25:43 PM
relcec: and more importantly the Democrats intentionally left it broken

img.photobucket.com

Probably would have been prudent for republicans to offer some input outside of HITLER GRANDMA DEATH CAMPS in that case.
 
2012-05-16 04:26:03 PM
relcec: you just need to jump off your high horse for a moment and admit the democrat reform doesn't fix our healthcare problem at all, and more importantly the Democrats intentionally left it broken so costs can continue to spiral out of control because keeping the healthcare providers happy was more important than not f*cking over the Americana people.

Democrat plan GOOOD! Republican plan BAAAAD!
 
2012-05-16 04:26:30 PM
The GOP is really only set up to be a (warning: ironic pun ahead) minority party. They don't want to govern - governing is hard!

They want to say no. They want to insist whatever the Democrats are doing is awful, its destroying the country, its the end of bacon as we know it. When they do get in a position of power, they have no idea what to do. "Cut spending! Cut taxes!" Okay, what exactly do you want to cut. "Everything! 'cept defense!"

These aren't policies. They're slogans. They have no plan because they don't want a plan. Plans are hard and just risk alienating some of your voters.
 
2012-05-16 04:27:11 PM
AverageJoe77: Diogenes: cman: Considering the attitudes of the SCOTUS members when this came for debate, the GOP does not have to worry about repealing it. SCOTUS is gonna do that for them

Thereby paving the way for the version we wanted in the first place - with a single-payer structure.

Am I crazy in thinking this was Obama's plan all along? He's been pretty good at playing the Republicans in the long game.


The issue with this thought process is that by giving up / losing the local and state elections, and the redistricting that came from the 2010 Census, the Republicans actually did fairly well play the long game by gerrymandering the country further into their favor, especially given that many of the reapportioned Representatives came from Blue states and went to Red / Reddish-Purple states. Now, if HCR is struck down in June and the Dems can successfully campaign on what that means to average Americans, that might rile up the voters enough to carry enough down-ticket weight to have another 2008... But that's an awful lot of if's, maybe's, and might's.
 
2012-05-16 04:27:44 PM
relcec: they just won't do it because they are the greatest corporate sell outs that ever existed in American politics.

Well, a close second anyways. So vote Republican.
 
2012-05-16 04:29:24 PM
MisterRonbo: Plans are hard and just risk alienating some of your voters.

In all fairness, Paul Ryan has plans.

It's just that nobody - D, R, or I - like them.
 
2012-05-16 04:29:52 PM
Serious Black: Jackson Herring: Smackledorfer: Also, bsrb? Really?

I swear people around here have the memory of goldfish when it comes to recognizing people's posting styles

Honestly, I'm kind of wondering if relcec had a stroke recently. We used to have great discussions about what we needed to do with the health care system, and then a few months ago, he started jumping down my throat constantly about how I want to slobber all over President Obama's dick and carry water for the Democrats.


Some days they just dial it in. It's almost like two different people do the trolling for some alt and bot accounts. BTW, What happened to penman?
 
2012-05-16 04:30:08 PM
AcneVulgaris: relcec: you just need to jump off your high horse for a moment and admit the democrat reform doesn't fix our healthcare problem at all, and more importantly the Democrats intentionally left it broken so costs can continue to spiral out of control because keeping the healthcare providers happy was more important than not f*cking over the Americana people.

Democrat plan GOOOD! Republican plan BAAAAD!


api.photoshop.com
 
2012-05-16 04:34:19 PM
EighthDay: MisterRonbo: Plans are hard and just risk alienating some of your voters.

In all fairness, Paul Ryan has plans.

It's just that nobody - D, R, or I - like them.


While the plan sucked donkey balls I'll at least give him credit that he put his money where his mouth is. Better than Republicans for years saying they were the fiscally conservative party but when push came to shove doing nothing to show it. At least the Ryan plan dealt with the reality of not raising taxes in any circumstances and what it would take to match government spending with revenue.
 
2012-05-16 04:36:52 PM
Lunchlady: EighthDay: MisterRonbo: Plans are hard and just risk alienating some of your voters.

In all fairness, Paul Ryan has plans.

It's just that nobody - D, R, or I - like them.

While the plan sucked donkey balls I'll at least give him credit that he put his money where his mouth is. Better than Republicans for years saying they were the fiscally conservative party but when push came to shove doing nothing to show it. At least the Ryan plan dealt with the reality of not raising taxes in any circumstances and what it would take to match government spending with revenue.


Doesn't it still rely on unrealistic growth and unemployment levels to achieve any progress though?
 
2012-05-16 04:39:02 PM
The GOP New Platform: "It's too hard, fark it"....actually resonates with a lot of Americans
 
2012-05-16 04:39:05 PM
Serious Black: Jackson Herring: Smackledorfer: Also, bsrb? Really?

I swear people around here have the memory of goldfish when it comes to recognizing people's posting styles

Honestly, I'm kind of wondering if relcec had a stroke recently. We used to have great discussions about what we needed to do with the health care system, and then a few months ago, he started jumping down my throat constantly about how I want to slobber all over President Obama's dick and carry water for the Democrats.


I've seen that happen this past month to some users who I pegged as reasonable in political topics. Then all of a sudden they now swallow any derp possible and act completely partisan.

Perhaps they got tired of being overlooked due to being calm and sane and decided to go full attention whore.
 
2012-05-16 04:39:48 PM
Jubeebee: Part of the problem is that while Obamacare is an evil socialist death panel plot, the individual reforms in the Affordable Care Act are actually quite popular when people are polled about them a la carte.

The Republicans can't repeal Obamacare without getting rid of all of the things people like about the ACA, because reality sucks sometimes.


When you ignore all the downsides, anything with upsides looks great.

The Republicans are fortunate that they can remain invertebrates and let the Supreme Court do the revoking for them.
 
2012-05-16 04:41:04 PM
relcec: Serious Black: relcec: Serious Black: Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Republicans don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?

Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Democrats don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?

There are Republicans in Congress that support Medicare for All?

Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Democrats don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?

you just need to jump off your high horse for a moment and admit the democrat reform doesn't fix our healthcare problem at all, and more importantly the Democrats intentionally left it broken so costs can continue to spiral out of control because keeping the healthcare providers happy was more important than not f*cking over the Americana people.


Seriously, I don't know what happened to you. We used to have amazing and respectful conversations about health care. Now you treat me like I'm a farking pariah because...well, I don't know why. I haven't stopped cheering for an efficient and universal health care system whether it's like Switzerland, Taiwan, or Singapore. I haven't flipped on supply-side controls in terms of adopting new technologies like Singapore does. I still complain that all the solutions people have discussed don't do anything to actually control prices outside of maybe the global payment system Massachusetts is trying to build. What the fark happened?
 
2012-05-16 04:41:46 PM
Smackledorfer: Doesn't it still rely on unrealistic growth and unemployment levels to achieve any progress though?

and more tax cuts for corporations and the rich. Don't forget more tax cuts, serfs.
 
2012-05-16 04:42:59 PM
Hurr durr everyone is already insured. Gubbamint socialism.
 
2012-05-16 04:43:18 PM
DeaH: Did anyone ever think the current Republican Party had plans to replace Obamacare with anything other than boot straps, that is, the boot straps you should already have if you're worth anything at all?

I do. See above. I don't know if their tweaks make things better or worse, but that's what I get when I try to translate mottos, Heritage Foundation papers, and the like into actual policy. What I lay out makes the insurance companies the bad cops instead of the IRS. The Dems didn't do it this way because the insurance lobby persuaded them not to. Every insurance company supports ACA, check their websites. There's a reason they support it; it makes the IRS do their job for them.
 
2012-05-16 04:45:25 PM
Smackledorfer: Lunchlady: EighthDay: MisterRonbo: Plans are hard and just risk alienating some of your voters.

In all fairness, Paul Ryan has plans.

It's just that nobody - D, R, or I - like them.

While the plan sucked donkey balls I'll at least give him credit that he put his money where his mouth is. Better than Republicans for years saying they were the fiscally conservative party but when push came to shove doing nothing to show it. At least the Ryan plan dealt with the reality of not raising taxes in any circumstances and what it would take to match government spending with revenue.

Doesn't it still rely on unrealistic growth and unemployment levels to achieve any progress though?


Are you saying 8% growth is not our standard yearly GDP growth? Are you suggesting that such an estimate may be so ludicrous as to be unable to be taken seriously? Are you besmirching the good name of the Ryan Plan for Fiscal Solvency?

// the RPFS that no one voted for - it has a perfect record!
 
2012-05-16 04:51:10 PM
No [obvious] tag?
 
2012-05-16 04:52:35 PM
HotWingConspiracy: relcec: and more importantly the Democrats intentionally left it broken

[img.photobucket.com image 382x305]

Probably would have been prudent for republicans to offer some input outside of HITLER GRANDMA DEATH CAMPS in that case.


HITLER GRANDMA DEATH CAMPS wasn't responsible for writing this corporatist sellout bill that requires citizens to buy crap that is too expensive and that they don't need from under force of federal law.

the fact that our president felt that appeasing the hospital industry was more important than fixing the real structural problem that creates all the problems we see daily in our system was the proximate cause of this embarrassment.

I have always freely admitted republicans are assholes on this. like I said the only real solution for our problem runs counter to what they have claimed is the solution to healthcare (and for most systems) for decades and decades. many current republican legislators honestly probably believe the nonsense they spout about this problem because it has been ingrained in them since the 1980's. this is partly an explanation, but of course it can't be an excuse. and of course the republican shortcomings cannot be used to explain or excuse the democratic failures on this front however.

when the democrat party long ago decided that their relationships with business were more important than their links with the people we were probably doomed to get a not even half assed attempt at reform that essentially just throws yet more of other peoples money at a problem that is at its heart a problem of uncontrolled inflation.
 
2012-05-16 04:55:59 PM
relcec: the democrat party

When I read this phrase, I automatically disregard anything else that may have been written in the post.

It's a handy and useful rule.
 
2012-05-16 05:08:39 PM
relcec: HITLER GRANDMA DEATH CAMPS wasn't responsible for writing this corporatist sellout bill that requires citizens to buy crap that is too expensive and that they don't need from under force of federal law.

the fact that our president felt that appeasing the hospital industry was more important than fixing the real structural problem that creates all the problems we see daily in our system was the proximate cause of this embarrassment.


You mean the fact that he's too much like your beloved republicans is the problem that caused this go-nowhere healthcare "reform"?
 
2012-05-16 05:10:19 PM
relcec: HotWingConspiracy: relcec: and more importantly the Democrats intentionally left it broken

[img.photobucket.com image 382x305]

Probably would have been prudent for republicans to offer some input outside of HITLER GRANDMA DEATH CAMPS in that case.

HITLER GRANDMA DEATH CAMPS wasn't responsible for writing this corporatist sellout bill that requires citizens to buy crap that is too expensive and that they don't need from under force of federal law.

the fact that our president felt that appeasing the hospital industry was more important than fixing the real structural problem that creates all the problems we see daily in our system was the proximate cause of this embarrassment.

I have always freely admitted republicans are assholes on this. like I said the only real solution for our problem runs counter to what they have claimed is the solution to healthcare (and for most systems) for decades and decades. many current republican legislators honestly probably believe the nonsense they spout about this problem because it has been ingrained in them since the 1980's. this is partly an explanation, but of course it can't be an excuse. and of course the republican shortcomings cannot be used to explain or excuse the democratic failures on this front however.

when the democrat party long ago decided that their relationships with business were more important than their links with the people we were probably doomed to get a not even half assed attempt at reform that essentially just throws yet more of other peoples money at a problem that is at its heart a problem of uncontrolled inflation.


Are you under the impression that was a realistic possibility of passing single payer at any point in recent history even if there was 100% Democratic support for it??
 
2012-05-16 05:13:19 PM
Serious Black: relcec: Serious Black: relcec: Serious Black: Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Republicans don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?

Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Democrats don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?

There are Republicans in Congress that support Medicare for All?

Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Democrats don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?

you just need to jump off your high horse for a moment and admit the democrat reform doesn't fix our healthcare problem at all, and more importantly the Democrats intentionally left it broken so costs can continue to spiral out of control because keeping the healthcare providers happy was more important than not f*cking over the Americana people.

Seriously, I don't know what happened to you. We used to have amazing and respectful conversations about health care. Now you treat me like I'm a farking pariah because...well, I don't know why. I haven't stopped cheering for an efficient and universal health care system whether it's like Switzerland, Taiwan, or Singapore. I haven't flipped on supply-side controls in terms of adopting new technologies like Singapore does. I still complain that all the solutions people have discussed don't do anything to actually control prices outside of maybe the global payment system Massachusetts is trying to build. What the fark happened?

what did I say that bothered you? get off your high horse? repeating what you said back to you?

things like this bother me:
Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Republicans don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?

you appear to assign actual malice to republicans and ignore democrat failings driven by corporatism purely for the sake of political support. it bothers me because I know you are as close to an expert on these things as it gets. I don't jump into threads and say *problem: democrats, the root of all evil* and I guess it bothers me when I see someone I respect doing what I think is the equivalent.
 
2012-05-16 05:16:25 PM
simplicimus: The idea floated by some Republicans to leave health care reform to the states is ridiculous. How many states have the excess money to fund it?

That's a dumb argument, as there's no reason the states (or the Federal government) will have to "pay" for it. People are still going to have to pay for their own health insurance. By making the system more efficient, you can cut costs and still have a large enough surplus to cover the uninsured who can't afford to pay for their own coverage. Remember that we currently spend more per capita on health care than any other nation on earth, yet our current system fails under any metric you can think of.
 
2012-05-16 05:17:24 PM
relcec: the fact that our president felt that appeasing the hospital industry was more important than fixing the real structural problem that creates all the problems we see daily in our system was the proximate cause of this embarrassment.

Your comment is an impressive monument to your persona's stupidity as usual, but I guess the important thing is that you've finally moved on from the "Obama's going to make guns illegal!!" hysteria from late 2008 - 2009.
 
2012-05-16 05:19:32 PM
mrshowrules: Jubeebee: Serious Black: Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Republicans don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?

Part of the problem is that while Obamacare is an evil socialist death panel plot, the individual reforms in the Affordable Care Act are actually quite popular when people are polled about them a la carte.

The Republicans can't repeal Obamacare without getting rid of all of the things people like about the ACA, because reality sucks sometimes.

If you ignore the people who don't think the act went far enough, it is actually quite popular.


Its that popular in Canada?
 
2012-05-16 05:23:49 PM
relcec: Serious Black: Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Republicans don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?

Is anybody other than Jack's face really surprised that the Democrats don't give a rat's ass about fixing our health care system?


Echolalia is a worrisome symptom, and can be indicative of a serious psychiatric disorder.
 
2012-05-16 05:25:04 PM
relcec: you appear to assign actual malice to republicans and ignore democrat failings driven by corporatism purely for the sake of political support. it bothers me because I know you are as close to an expert on these things as it gets.

Yeah, but the GOP is definitely the avant garde in forging the purely evil pro-corporatist agenda.
 
2012-05-16 05:25:46 PM
relcec: you appear to assign actual malice to republicans and ignore democrat failings driven by corporatism purely for the sake of political support. it bothers me because I know you are as close to an expert on these things as it gets. I don't jump into threads and say *problem: democrats, the root of all evil* and I guess it bothers me when I see someone I respect doing what I think is the equivalent.

I'm going to go ahead and assign malice to Republicans on this one, in the form of good old fashioned greed. The problem is quite literally that the large donors to the Republican party do not want to pony up to pay for healthcare, which they would have to do under any health plan. Because there is no plan on the f*cking Earth that would not involve having to raise taxes to support it. It's really about taxes and money.

What the Democrats compromised with, because even their base wasn't progressive enough to sanction single payer (most likely due to more money - well of course they are paid off) was a system that fixed many but not all problems with the healthcare system. And there was independent research support on it, saying that it was better than the alternative, which is nothing. And bills can be more easily amended over time.

The Republicans really don't care about fixing health care. They either don't care or they don't have enough actual knowledge or brains on the subject to actually provide solutions. Either option is lazy or incompetant at best, and frankly if that is their stance I don't want them in office. If I could I would also choose to vote out a good number of Democrats on the basis that they don't support single payer, but since I can't I will take what I can get for now.

And this is coming from someone who has VERY good corporate-provided health care.
 
2012-05-16 05:28:29 PM
relcec: you appear to assign actual malice to republicans

You think republicans aren't motivated by malice when they propose to cut funding for breast cancer screening, take away hospital visitation rights from gay couples, or force completely unnecessary, painful, and embarrassing medical procedures on women exercising their reproductive rights?

Do you somehow manage to convince yourself that the malice in all of these things is just a huge coincidence?
 
2012-05-16 05:30:59 PM
Dwight_Yeast: our current system fails under any metric you can think of.

What about insurance company shareholder value? We're probably pretty successful by that metric.
 
2012-05-16 05:31:32 PM
EyeballKid: [i352.photobucket.com image 502x375]
You thought the Republicans were going to fix something?


Beavis: "YES! YESSSSSSSSSSSSS! LIAR!"

You are aweome.
 
2012-05-16 05:32:43 PM
EyeballKid: [i352.photobucket.com image 502x375]
You thought the Republicans were going to fix something?


Thanks for the memories, I haven't listened to that in a decade.
 
2012-05-16 05:34:14 PM
Awww, did they forget that it was the GOP's plan to reform healthcare in the first place? How cute.
 
2012-05-16 05:36:52 PM
relcec: *problem: democrats, the root of all evil*

You pretty much did. You don't get a pass because you are only doing it because some other guy did it. You don't get a pass because you think its a valid response to attacks on republicans. You definitely don't get a pass on conflating the party that is doing a poor job of dealing with our health care costs (though the party is clearly not of one mind on what to do) with the party who does their best to stop them from making attempts and provides no alternatives of their own - both when they have the reigns of power and when claiming what the dems do is so bad.

Now, none of that is to say that any change is by default to be viewed as good change, nor do I particularly care for the AFA. But it does speak to how I judge the two parties' views on things as explained above. Meaning partially well and failing is vastly superior to using the issue as a political talking point platform to repeat various principles of how the government should be run, and then doing shiat all about it when you have a chance.
 
2012-05-16 05:39:48 PM
relcec: you appear to assign actual malice to republicans and ignore democrat failings driven by corporatism purely for the sake of political support. it bothers me because I know you are as close to an expert on these things as it gets. I don't jump into threads and say *problem: democrats, the root of all evil* and I guess it bothers me when I see someone I respect doing what I think is the equivalent.

I apologize for giving that impression. My word choice was definitely harsh. I hate the pro-corporate bent that has infected the Democratic Party over the last thirty years, especially when it comes to the health care and financial sectors. The reason I tossed out that line at the beginning of this thread is that everyone knows there are problems with health care in this country; even the Republicans know this. Not suggesting solutions to the problems we face is indefensible. For over two years, I've heard the big shots in the GOP constantly chanting "repeal and replace" as their slogan for how to deal with Obamacare, and they have never come out with what that replacement is. Now that it's coming down to the wire where they absolutely need to build that replacement, they're digging in their heels and offering bupkus. That does absolutely nothing for the millions of people who are suffering because Frankenstein's monster hasn't incorporated them into his parts yet. They're consigning those people to bankruptcy and death. Just saying "no" is not a governing strategy.
 
2012-05-16 05:40:11 PM
qorkfiend: What about insurance company shareholder value? We're probably pretty successful by that metric.

That and executive corporate compensation packages.

/yeah, it did cross my mind
 
2012-05-16 05:48:46 PM
THIS is why I remain a conservative independent.

Can't trust any politicians these days, even the one who claim to carry the mantle of conservative.
 
2012-05-16 06:14:31 PM
EyeballKid: [weaselzippers.us image 450x333]
Duh, guys, the Republican Health Care Plan was made known to the public a while back.


but no death panels? isn't that more efficient?
 
2012-05-16 06:16:17 PM
img528.imageshack.us
 
2012-05-16 06:27:18 PM
relcec: Herp derp democrat party hurr durr burr

Calling them the Democrat Party says everything about how the Democratic Party is a bunch of socialists who want to gay marry you and convert you into atheist pagan Muslim Nazi hippies who Hate America, and nothing at all about your command of the English language.
 
2012-05-16 06:50:55 PM
I read the connected article about Leno and Romney commenting about people being sick then buying insurance. From what I was told by an insurance agent, in Kansas, you can refuse to buy insurance, then if you get sick, for 5 grand you can get insurance. This leaves out the poor people. Imagine. that.

This man has no idea does he? It's whatever gets him a vote, like Obama on gay marriage. Sad...really sad.
 
2012-05-16 07:02:40 PM
Bigdogdaddy: Obama on gay marriage

I'm still not convinced he's going to gain much out of that. He picked up some donors sure, but he had plenty of cash.
 
2012-05-16 07:40:52 PM
Smackledorfer: Bigdogdaddy: Obama on gay marriage

I'm still not convinced he's going to gain much out of that. He picked up some donors sure, but he had plenty of cash.


I think it will cost him more, but probably in states he had no chance of winning anyway.
 
2012-05-16 08:23:51 PM
Bigdogdaddy: Smackledorfer: Bigdogdaddy: Obama on gay marriage

I'm still not convinced he's going to gain much out of that. He picked up some donors sure, but he had plenty of cash.

I think it will cost him more, but probably in states he had no chance of winning anyway.


Considering the "restrict homosexual marriage" crowd very closely overlaps with the "restrict interracial marriage " crowd on the social ven diagram, I don't really think he's risking much.
 
Displayed 50 of 117 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report