If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Gizmodo)   Kodak bankruptcy goodies: Kodak name, a plethora of patents, weapons grade nuclear reactor hidden in basement in NY   (gizmodo.com) divider line 123
    More: Interesting, Kodak, New York, nuclear reactors, underground bunker, basements, Democrat and Chronicle  
•       •       •

17557 clicks; posted to Main » on 14 May 2012 at 3:41 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



123 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-05-14 07:37:16 AM
wagnerism: I think I know where Kodak got the nuclear material in the first place.

Amazon.com

This product page has been around a long time... probably longer than Kodak itself. (just kidding, time trolls)

If you have not yet seen this, read the reviews. They're awesome.


+1 awesome. I laughed out loud in a public place by myself.

/I don't have the unicorm meat, but I do have the SQL T-shirt
 
2012-05-14 07:40:10 AM
downpaymentblues: Spad31: haemaker: Kodak Had a Secret Nuclear Reactor Loaded With Weapons-Grade Uranium Hidden In a Basement

Ugh. Not all "enriched uranium" is "weapons grade".

Hush. You'll spoil the knee-jerk.

Or, he will read the article.

You can too! It's only one click away! Go on. You can do it!


To be fair, you're asking us to read a gawker site.
 
2012-05-14 07:52:34 AM
Not surprised at all, have lived in the area all my life, Kodak in its day was seriously into many many different businesses. Very sad to see them go this way, I blame the incompetence of the current CEO and board. They are pathetic.
 
2012-05-14 07:57:01 AM
Not such a secret. My sweetie is a Kodak engineer, and she's never worked in a division that would have used this reactor for anything. She was well aware of its existence.
 
2012-05-14 08:00:31 AM
Gyrfalcon: But since everyone now knows about it, I'm sure we'll get lots of knee-jerk reactionary panic about what COULD HAVE HAPPENED OMFG!!!!! and now everyone within a 90-mile radius will come down with mysterious cancers, deformed babies and furtive men in turbans and kafiyehs even though the thing was dismantled five years ago.

Actually, Kodak has been cited several times for polluting the area, cancer clusters, etc. I've been in Rochester my whole life and this doesn't surprise me at all.

Do a Google search for Rand Street and Kodak and enjoy. Many of my friends lived in that area growing up, most have health issues now.
 
2012-05-14 08:07:57 AM
downpaymentblues: Spad31: haemaker: Kodak Had a Secret Nuclear Reactor Loaded With Weapons-Grade Uranium Hidden In a Basement

Ugh. Not all "enriched uranium" is "weapons grade".

Hush. You'll spoil the knee-jerk.

Or, he will read the article.

You can too! It's only one click away! Go on. You can do it!


It's Gizmodo. It's usually three clicks to get the whole page to load.
I biatched about Io9 pulling that shiat a couple of times a month or two ago and I guess someone there listened.
Let's see how long it takes these guys.
 
2012-05-14 08:10:10 AM
Gyrfalcon: IT COULD HAVE BEEN HORRIBLE! IT COULD HAVE EXPLODED! THEY COULD HAVE STARTED A NUCLEAR WAR!!!

...except that it was very small, heavily guarded, and they didn't have all the other stuff you need to make a nuclear bomb except the plutonium, and since NOBODY KNEW about it, it could never have been broken into by terrorists etc. etc. etc. and all that other scary stuff.

Proving only that if you never tell anybody something, nobody will ever know about it. And ESPECIALLY the Feds.

But since everyone now knows about it, I'm sure we'll get lots of knee-jerk reactionary panic about what COULD HAVE HAPPENED OMFG!!!!! and now everyone within a 90-mile radius will come down with mysterious cancers, deformed babies and furtive men in turbans and kafiyehs even though the thing was dismantled five years ago.


Hey, dumbass?

The Feds knew.

Try some reading comprehension.
 
2012-05-14 08:12:01 AM
I think it was for a little "project" for their competition, but was too late to help.

Fujifilm is victorious.
 
2012-05-14 08:16:39 AM
wagnerism: I think I know where Kodak got the nuclear material in the first place.

Amazon.com

This product page has been around a long time... probably longer than Kodak itself. (just kidding, time trolls)

If you have not yet seen this, read the reviews. They're awesome.


Thanks that's ruined my productivity for today.

/Off to buy some
 
2012-05-14 08:19:03 AM
haemaker: Woah. I stand corrected. It could have been weapons grade.

It had 1.5 Kg U-235 (unknown enrichment level). Little Boy had 64Kg.


To be fair, Little Boy was horribly inefficient, I'd be willing to bet 1.5 Kg is enough for a weapon, assuming it was weapons grade.
 
2012-05-14 08:20:46 AM
praymantis: Not surprised at all, have lived in the area all my life, Kodak in its day was seriously into many many different businesses. Very sad to see them go this way, I blame the incompetence of the current CEO and board. They are pathetic.

Kodak's demise started long before that. I seem to remember a very expensive patent infringement suit brought by Polaroid regarding instant camera film chemistry that Kodak lost.

And then there's the loss of the Hubbel telescope lens contract to Perkin-Elmer. (Which Perkin-Elmer totally screwed up also, requiring multiple trips into space to give the Hubbel a set of corrective lenses).

But the real downfall came as Kodak chose the low end market for digital cameras. Their lenses and sensors were perfectly fine but the conversion algorithm used in camera to convert from raw to jpg was sloppy and resulted in a lot of noise in the pictures. Throw in the awful Easyshare crap and poorly manufactured docking systems and their digital camera market share, which they invested heavily in, never ever took off.

It's been pretty sad to watch their slow motion slide from market dominance to laughing stock.

Yeah, I was born and raised in the Flower City too.
 
2012-05-14 08:23:06 AM
henryhill: Why does Fark greenlight submissions from people that are illiterate?

Because the writers claim to have degrees in English.
 
2012-05-14 08:27:17 AM
MindStalker: haemaker: Woah. I stand corrected. It could have been weapons grade.

It had 1.5 Kg U-235 (unknown enrichment level). Little Boy had 64Kg.

To be fair, Little Boy was horribly inefficient, I'd be willing to bet 1.5 Kg is enough for a weapon, assuming it was weapons grade.


Nope, using U-235, you need around 100 lbs (Yeah, yeah, wiki, I don't have time right now to dig into better sources)
 
2012-05-14 08:30:35 AM
The installation was in Kodak's R&D complex where lots of material science research is done...Kodak has a long history of advanced materials research and lots of patents in this area. Plus they had a lot of military contracts going back a decade and earlier. Not surprising at all. I worked there and unknowingly walked over the top of this thing a million times!
 
2012-05-14 08:31:54 AM
Kodak's "true colors" were yellow with black triangles!
 
2012-05-14 08:38:35 AM
===OPERATION INSTRUCTIONS===

*Open the door.
*Unlock the system.
*Insert a full trap.
*Release the trap.
*Close the door.
*lock the system.
*Set the entry grid.
*Neutralize the field.
*Pull lever and when the light is green, the trap is clean.

images.wikia.com
 
2012-05-14 08:43:06 AM
profplump: As noted above, the State of New York did know.

BUT, emergencies are, by FEMA/Homeland Security definition, "local first". This means that the local municipality and county EM plans need to account for all hazards, which are coordinated up to the state and then federal level. But they all start local. Under the post-Katrina era, the locality is responsible first, until it's resources are exhausted before it can request or get state/federal disaster declarations (states vary somewhat, but most adhere to FEMA/DHS guidelines).

And there's the problem- if the first responders don't know about the hazards (and we don't know that for sure- perhaps the local EM is just being quiet and has marked that part of their plan as non-FOI-able) then if a disaster (to the facility or locality) occurred, responders would be walking into a potentially lethal situation without awareness. In short, I'm calling BS.
 
2012-05-14 08:43:55 AM
profplump: way south: Practically speaking, should something happen (fire, flood, quake, etc...) the state authorities would probably be on scene first.
They might have appreciated the heads up.

As noted above, the State of New York did know.

And the plethora of security and safety locks, placards, and other deterrents probably would have tipped them off even if the state didn't know. If standard emergency crew training doesn't include "don't break locks to go places that warn of eminent personal danger" we've got bigger problems than a lack of industry coordination.


Signs can be obscured or damaged by fire and debris. A lock or a piece of chain is no obstruction to an overzealous firefighter looking for the source of smoke.
If you don't know to look out for something and the buildings come down, it wouldn't be too hard to expose yourself.
 
2012-05-14 08:56:11 AM
s9.postimage.org
free image hosting

Unimpressed.
 
2012-05-14 09:02:18 AM
Gyrfalcon: IT COULD HAVE BEEN HORRIBLE! IT COULD HAVE EXPLODED! THEY COULD HAVE STARTED A NUCLEAR WAR!!!

...except that it was very small, heavily guarded, and they didn't have all the other stuff you need to make a nuclear bomb except the plutonium, and since NOBODY KNEW about it, it could never have been broken into by terrorists etc. etc. etc. and all that other scary stuff.


Right. Without a high-explosive implosion sphere AND an unenriched (U-238) tamper AND some serious timers/triggers/electronics, the worst thing it could have been was a 'dirty' bomb. And even with those things, I think the minimum required amount of U-235 required to go super-critical is around 13kg... or somewhere in that area. Still, what the hell, Kodak?
 
2012-05-14 09:05:05 AM
MindStalker: haemaker: Woah. I stand corrected. It could have been weapons grade.

It had 1.5 Kg U-235 (unknown enrichment level). Little Boy had 64Kg.

To be fair, Little Boy was horribly inefficient, I'd be willing to bet 1.5 Kg is enough for a weapon, assuming it was weapons grade.


Apparently the untamped spherical critical mass of U-235 is around 56 Kg. You can improve that down to around 14 Kg with with very advanced engineering, but that's still almost a factor of 10 greater than 1.5 Kg.
 
2012-05-14 09:14:36 AM
Marcintosh: So, what about the reactor in Cambridge MA? Or is that alright . . .

Wait...what?!
 
2012-05-14 09:21:59 AM
Not a nuclear power plant.

Not even close.

Impossible for it to melt down. Not enough material in it. Entirely different designed from a pressurized water reactor.

I imagine it was very handy for developing film that wouldn't be effected by radiation as much.
 
2012-05-14 09:22:56 AM
Jim.Casy: Marcintosh: So, what about the reactor in Cambridge MA? Or is that alright . . .

Wait...what?!


MIT has a nuclear reactor. What? You didn't know?
 
2012-05-14 09:30:29 AM
'Plethora' indicates an unwanted abundance. Think sand flies or somethin'.
 
2012-05-14 09:41:10 AM
dittybopper: MindStalker: haemaker: Woah. I stand corrected. It could have been weapons grade.

It had 1.5 Kg U-235 (unknown enrichment level). Little Boy had 64Kg.

To be fair, Little Boy was horribly inefficient, I'd be willing to bet 1.5 Kg is enough for a weapon, assuming it was weapons grade.

Apparently the untamped spherical critical mass of U-235 is around 56 Kg. You can improve that down to around 14 Kg with with very advanced engineering, but that's still almost a factor of 10 greater than 1.5 Kg.


What if you had 1.5Kg of U-235 mixed in with truck bomb? How bad would the radiation be, and how wide spread would the radiation be?

You don't need to reach critical mass to cause a whole shiat load of chaos.
 
2012-05-14 09:52:23 AM
BigBooper: dittybopper: MindStalker: haemaker: Woah. I stand corrected. It could have been weapons grade.

It had 1.5 Kg U-235 (unknown enrichment level). Little Boy had 64Kg.

To be fair, Little Boy was horribly inefficient, I'd be willing to bet 1.5 Kg is enough for a weapon, assuming it was weapons grade.

Apparently the untamped spherical critical mass of U-235 is around 56 Kg. You can improve that down to around 14 Kg with with very advanced engineering, but that's still almost a factor of 10 greater than 1.5 Kg.

What if you had 1.5Kg of U-235 mixed in with truck bomb? How bad would the radiation be, and how wide spread would the radiation be?

You don't need to reach critical mass to cause a whole shiat load of chaos.


Not very far, and not very badly.

First, Uranium is a very dense metal, and it's also quite malleable, like lead, which means it's hard to shatter it into very tiny pieces, and those very tiny pieces are still quite heavy, so once they aren't being actively propelled by the blast, they fall pretty quickly. Unless you were there when the bomb went off, your exposure would be pretty minimal.

Also, an uncritical mass of U-235 isn't actually very radioactive. Certainly, little bits of U-235 here and there from an explosion wouldn't be all that dangerous from a radiological point of view. You'd have to worry about long term exposure to skin, and perhaps breathing in particles of it if you were part of the clean up crew, but they know how to do that sort of thing.

That's not to say it wouldn't cause panic, it might, but that's not because it's really, really super-de-duper dangerous, but more along the lines of ignorance amongst the public about radiological hazards.
 
2012-05-14 09:57:49 AM
so did Kodak possess more WMD than Iraq?
 
2012-05-14 10:12:06 AM
And how did they get permission to own it, let alone install it in a basement in the middle of a densely populated city?

The author has clearly never been to Rochester. This was clearly a joint federal-corporate operation to wipe that buttstain off the map...
 
2012-05-14 10:34:42 AM
dittybopper: BigBooper: dittybopper: MindStalker: haemaker: Woah. I stand corrected. It could have been weapons grade.

It had 1.5 Kg U-235 (unknown enrichment level). Little Boy had 64Kg.

To be fair, Little Boy was horribly inefficient, I'd be willing to bet 1.5 Kg is enough for a weapon, assuming it was weapons grade.

Apparently the untamped spherical critical mass of U-235 is around 56 Kg. You can improve that down to around 14 Kg with with very advanced engineering, but that's still almost a factor of 10 greater than 1.5 Kg.

What if you had 1.5Kg of U-235 mixed in with truck bomb? How bad would the radiation be, and how wide spread would the radiation be?

You don't need to reach critical mass to cause a whole shiat load of chaos.

Not very far, and not very badly.

First, Uranium is a very dense metal, and it's also quite malleable, like lead, which means it's hard to shatter it into very tiny pieces, and those very tiny pieces are still quite heavy, so once they aren't being actively propelled by the blast, they fall pretty quickly. Unless you were there when the bomb went off, your exposure would be pretty minimal.

Also, an uncritical mass of U-235 isn't actually very radioactive. Certainly, little bits of U-235 here and there from an explosion wouldn't be all that dangerous from a radiological point of view. You'd have to worry about long term exposure to skin, and perhaps breathing in particles of it if you were part of the clean up crew, but they know how to do that sort of thing.

That's not to say it wouldn't cause panic, it might, but that's not because it's really, really super-de-duper dangerous, but more along the lines of ignorance amongst the public about radiological hazards.


DHS actually used to use a similar scenario to this in their hiring interviews for certain positions. They asked for estimated contamination area and exposures to the civilian population and the response team. On all counts, it was pretty low - not even near the levels of serious health problems.

The fear-uncertainty-doubt factor, though, due to a public that just sees any nuclear as OhMyGodBad, was estimated to be pretty high.
 
2012-05-14 10:45:41 AM
AT&T is unimpressed with Kodak's shenanigans. They made theirs go boom twice to produce controllable x-ray lasers.

/you get to play with cool stuff if you hire the bests physicists in the world
 
2012-05-14 10:54:47 AM
fluffy2097

Jim.Casy: Marcintosh: So, what about the reactor in Cambridge MA? Or is that alright . . .

Wait...what?!

MIT has a nuclear reactor. What? You didn't know?


Remain calm. Don't panic. It's right next door to this:

home.earthlink.net

(Off-frame to the right. No photo 'cause it's kinda dull and not humorous.)
 
2012-05-14 11:06:54 AM
This is proof that there is no peaceful purpose for nuclear reactors, Kodak had one and it destroyed the company. This is why we need to invade Iran

/ vote for me as the Republican candidate!
 
2012-05-14 11:13:27 AM
Larva Lump: It's right next door to this:

*I*
want a warehouse of rage...
 
2012-05-14 11:16:26 AM
Daveism: Larva Lump: It's right next door to this:

*I* want a warehouse of rage...


I want an Ire proof rage warehouse.

Can't have the rage escaping.
 
2012-05-14 11:24:49 AM
aniyn: Didn't you guys invade a country for less than that?

can't invade ourselves, I guess.

/ you are not wrong.
 
2012-05-14 11:26:20 AM
So wait, it's a nuclear source for testing? Essentially a very very very high powered X-ray machine. Why is this a big deal?
 
2012-05-14 11:27:47 AM
haemaker: Woah. I stand corrected. It could have been weapons grade.

It had 1.5 Kg U-235 (unknown enrichment level). Little Boy had 64Kg.


If I remember correctly, weapons grade is 95%, but I could be wrong. This report says 93%, and I read it as saying the thing was sub-critical by design. So not quite weapons grade--and the enrichment process is way beyond what terrorists can accomplish.
 
2012-05-14 11:32:15 AM
profplump SmartestFunniest 2012-05-14 06:48:35 AM
Unobtanium: See: all the fights over cell-tower zoning.

Those are all about things like tower height and appearance though, not about the radio emissions.


I see you've never sat through a public hearing concerning the siting of a cell tower. Last one I was at, over half the public comments concerned being too close to source of evil invisible rays from the cell tower.
 
2012-05-14 11:42:42 AM
Kodak fails at capitalism. Had they sold that uranium to Al Qaeda they could've survived. Clearly, they just didn't want it enough
 
2012-05-14 11:48:55 AM
fluffy2097: Can't have the rage escaping.

I hate it when ire breaks out my rage...
 
2012-05-14 12:02:39 PM
cenobyte40k: So wait, it's a nuclear source for testing? Essentially a very very very high powered X-ray machine. Why is this a big deal?

It's not, but a photo of a radioactive anything will go critical mass on the internet in an instant.

Everyone wants to see a "Hidden nuclear reactor"
 
2012-05-14 12:06:02 PM
Now the more pressing matter then secret nuclear weapons lab thing is the matter of was that photo taken with a Kodak camera and/or film?
 
2012-05-14 12:13:14 PM
Uisce Beatha: MindStalker: haemaker: Woah. I stand corrected. It could have been weapons grade.

It had 1.5 Kg U-235 (unknown enrichment level). Little Boy had 64Kg.

To be fair, Little Boy was horribly inefficient, I'd be willing to bet 1.5 Kg is enough for a weapon, assuming it was weapons grade.

Nope, using U-235, you need around 100 lbs (Yeah, yeah, wiki, I don't have time right now to dig into better sources)


Came here to point out how woefully under critical mass this was, but I see you all have it under control.

/One of my favorite research subjects.
 
2012-05-14 12:16:42 PM
cenobyte40k: So wait, it's a nuclear source for testing? Essentially a very very very high powered X-ray machine. Why is this a big deal?

Nuclear. Nuclear. Nuclear. Nuclear. Nuclear. Nuclear. Nuclear. Nuclear. Nuclear. Nuclear. Nuclear.
Radiation. Radiation. Radiation. Radiation. Radiation. Radiation. Radiation. Radiation. Radiation.

That's it. Or to put it in to less FUDy terms, the general populations ignorance about nuclear devices beyond mushroom clouds and their effects combined with the medias need to sensationalise every-god-damn-little-thing even if it's of no consequence is the 'big deal'.

jgk3:
I see you've never sat through a public hearing concerning the siting of a cell tower. Last one I was at, over half the public comments concerned being too close to source of evil invisible rays from the cell tower.


And I bet at least a medium sized continged also played the "think of the children" card as well.
 
2012-05-14 12:24:28 PM
profplump: Unobtanium: See: all the fights over cell-tower zoning.

Those are all about things like tower height and appearance though, not about the radio emissions.


Not around here. School systems are trying to negotiate tower rights on some school grounds, and the amount of "exposing our children" protests are just as vocal, if not more so.
 
2012-05-14 12:44:25 PM
vrax: [i49.tinypic.com image 400x267]

well done
 
2012-05-14 12:51:39 PM
djscram: haemaker: Woah. I stand corrected. It could have been weapons grade.

It had 1.5 Kg U-235 (unknown enrichment level). Little Boy had 64Kg.

If I remember correctly, weapons grade is 95%, but I could be wrong. This report says 93%, and I read it as saying the thing was sub-critical by design. So not quite weapons grade--and the enrichment process is way beyond what terrorists can accomplish.


and we are poking and prodding Iran when their enrichment levels are currently nowhere near HEU. They aren't much more than 20% at best (they claim only to 19.75% but that is BS just to not reach the 20% level set forth as a basement level to creating a nuclear weapon, though at 20% enrichment it would hardly qualify as a bomb, and would be so bulky, it would make it a joke. ) Technically the 20% level is the threshold between Enriched and highly enriched, but not on a practical level. This is pretty interesting though. Wasn't aware of that reactor myself.

/did some time at Oak Ridge NRL. awesome place to work, and has some really cool history. Secret city and all, not to mention some of the scorned lovers and suicidal pilots. Pre-9/11 for those. You'd never get a Cessna close enough to drop photos and papers about your ex-lover/coworker now.
best part is that the stream running through the grounds, is pretty contaminated, but apparently the contamination of that flowing stream ends at the property line before it runs into the Tennessee River.
 
2012-05-14 12:57:26 PM
Also, after reading the article linked by Happy Hours, I have a question, how many Curies in a dollop?
 
2012-05-14 01:37:18 PM
wagnerism: I think I know where Kodak got the nuclear material in the first place.

Amazon.com

This product page has been around a long time... probably longer than Kodak itself. (just kidding, time trolls)

If you have not yet seen this, read the reviews. They're awesome.


Customers who bought this also ordered: "The Making of the Atomic Bomb"
 
Displayed 50 of 123 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report