If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WRCB)   The Law of Unintended Consequences in action: Alabama farmers forced to plant fewer crops because they can't find enough Real 'Mericans to work the fields for the harvest   (wrcbtv.com) divider line 260
    More: Obvious, Alabama, unintended consequences, labor shortage, White House Rose Garden, North Alabama, crops, land areas, farmers  
•       •       •

10080 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 May 2012 at 12:59 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



260 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-05-13 12:39:42 PM
Less people to feed?

Has anyone in the state begun to consider this might not have been the brilliant stroke of genius that ALEC told them it would be?
 
2012-05-13 12:41:00 PM
The unintended consequence is that we are going to be importing more produce from South of the Border.

No. Not *that* South of the Border:
www.sciway.net
 
2012-05-13 12:42:43 PM
Is there a "Law of Obvious and Predictable Consequences"?
 
2012-05-13 12:44:41 PM
Cagey B: Is there a "Law of Obvious and Predictable Consequences"?

It's more of a suggestion, really
 
2012-05-13 12:46:58 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: Cagey B: Is there a "Law of Obvious and Predictable Consequences"?

It's more of a suggestion, really


It hasn't even made it to the Theory stage yet?
 
2012-05-13 12:47:36 PM
It's almost as if Americans won't work back-breaking labor for minimum wage or less. If your business plan depends of half-price labor, you need a new business plan. Blaming your own failure on an immigration law is ignoring your own problems.

That said, a lot of the unemployed and "they takin' our jorbs!" folks could do with some honest work instead of wanting to be coddled by the very socialist government they are supposedly wanting to do away with.
 
2012-05-13 12:49:41 PM
Nadie_AZ: Less people to feed?

Has anyone in the state begun to consider this might not have been the brilliant stroke of genius that ALEC told them it would be?


ALEC has a solution to that as well - fire office workers and outsource skilled labor to china and india. then hire the former office workers and tech people to work in the fields. and they'll do it because SOCIALISMS! plus, we can just rework the old serfdom rules and slap a modern shine on 'em. one or two slick advertising campaigns later and they'll LINE UP to join!

/this is what Republicans actually believe.
 
2012-05-13 12:51:06 PM
Weaver95: Nadie_AZ: Less people to feed?

Has anyone in the state begun to consider this might not have been the brilliant stroke of genius that ALEC told them it would be?

ALEC has a solution to that as well - fire office workers and outsource skilled labor to china and india. then hire the former office workers and tech people to work in the fields. and they'll do it because SOCIALISMS! plus, we can just rework the old serfdom rules and slap a modern shine on 'em. one or two slick advertising campaigns later and they'll LINE UP to join!

/this is what Republicans actually believe.


Huh. I thought Americans were inherently too smart for that kind of menial work. I read about it here:

www.thomaslfriedman.com
 
2012-05-13 12:52:59 PM
Alabama has a 7.6% unemployment rate, too.
 
2012-05-13 12:53:42 PM
BunkyBrewman: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Cagey B: Is there a "Law of Obvious and Predictable Consequences"?

It's more of a suggestion, really

It hasn't even made it to the Theory stage yet?


It used to be a law

/but that was before deregulation
 
2012-05-13 12:55:03 PM
Man On A Mission: It's almost as if Americans won't work back-breaking labor for minimum wage or less. If your business plan depends of half-price labor, you need a new business plan. Blaming your own failure on an immigration law is ignoring your own problems.

This right here. It's not that American's won't do the work. It's that they won't do the work for artificially low wages and allow you to ignore labor laws.
 
2012-05-13 12:55:53 PM
Nadie_AZ: Huh. I thought Americans were inherently too smart for that kind of menial work.

just get the kardashians to say how 'cool' it is to work on a farm, then cut welfare and unemployment benefits to the bone. once the peons understand that the choice is starve to death OR work themselves into an early grave for min wage and a bowl of soup then they'll man up and start picking berries for their masters.
 
2012-05-13 12:58:53 PM
Man On A Mission: It's almost as if Americans won't work back-breaking labor for minimum wage or less. If your business plan depends of half-price labor, you need a new business plan. Blaming your own failure on an immigration law is ignoring your own problems..

paying workers a decent wage is socialism. you should be PROUD to work yourself to death for min wage and no OSHA regs.
 
2012-05-13 01:00:06 PM
Get the OWS to take care of the COWS.
 
2012-05-13 01:02:08 PM
Weaver95: Man On A Mission: It's almost as if Americans won't work back-breaking labor for minimum wage or less. If your business plan depends of half-price labor, you need a new business plan. Blaming your own failure on an immigration law is ignoring your own problems..

paying workers a decent wage is socialism. you should be PROUD to work yourself to death for min wage and no OSHA regs.


Not to mention purchasing your food and supplies at a convenient company-owned store and living in the spacious and comfortable company housing.

Corporate Personhood is Best Personhood.
 
2012-05-13 01:02:42 PM
Aarontology: Alabama has a 7.6% unemployment rate, too.

Most of the unemployed probably aren't capable or willing to live the kind of seasonal and migratory lifestyles needed for these jobs.
 
2012-05-13 01:03:51 PM
More of this backbreaking manual labor would likely have been automated at this point if it weren't for cheap, desperate labor.
 
2012-05-13 01:05:04 PM
If only there was another group of people who live in the deep south who have a history of agriculture harvesting.
 
2012-05-13 01:05:24 PM
Thoguh: Man On A Mission: It's almost as if Americans won't work back-breaking labor for minimum wage or less. If your business plan depends of half-price labor, you need a new business plan. Blaming your own failure on an immigration law is ignoring your own problems.

This right here. It's not that American's won't do the work. It's that they won't do the work for artificially low wages and allow you to ignore labor laws.


You mean like the early 20th century?

Oh, the irony here is just too rich for me right now.
 
2012-05-13 01:06:57 PM
Thoguh: This right here. It's not that American's won't do the work. It's that they won't do the work for artificially low wages and allow you to ignore labor laws.

Average pay for those jobs in Alabama was $12/hr according to one of the many articles we've greenlit around here on the subject.
 
2012-05-13 01:07:31 PM
Enigmamf: More of this backbreaking manual labor would likely have been automated at this point if it weren't for cheap, desperate labor.

This.
Importing a workforce just to exploit them was not a viable a solution from the start.
 
2012-05-13 01:08:03 PM
BunkyBrewman: Thoguh: Man On A Mission: It's almost as if Americans won't work back-breaking labor for minimum wage or less. If your business plan depends of half-price labor, you need a new business plan. Blaming your own failure on an immigration law is ignoring your own problems.

This right here. It's not that American's won't do the work. It's that they won't do the work for artificially low wages and allow you to ignore labor laws.

You mean like the early 20th century?

Oh, the irony here is just too rich for me right now.


I ... what?

Isn't that when unions formed, companies made concessions, and (ultimately) laws were passed to codify those concessions?
 
2012-05-13 01:09:30 PM
farkreader007: If only there was another group of people who live in the deep south who have a history of agriculture harvesting.

I literally LOL'ed.
 
2012-05-13 01:10:40 PM
Headline sounds off; you shoulda said "less" subby as "crops" is pretty clearly a mass term in this case.
 
2012-05-13 01:12:25 PM
Farmers interviewed by The Associated Press say they had no choice but to reduce acreage. They fear there won't be enough workers to pick crops at harvest time. The crops are often picked by Hispanic migrants, both legal and illegal.

admin.bhbl.neric.org

Problem solved.

/i keed
 
2012-05-13 01:13:24 PM
I've done the field work that immigrants do for immigrant pay. If anyone can make minimum wage at McDonalds in air conditioning, why would they work for 30% to 50% under minimum wage in the torturous fields?
 
2012-05-13 01:14:52 PM
Just charge $12 for a tomato. Whole Foods will bang your doors down.
 
2012-05-13 01:15:31 PM
BunkyBrewman: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Cagey B: Is there a "Law of Obvious and Predictable Consequences"?

It's more of a suggestion, really

It hasn't even made it to the Theory stage yet?


Last I heard it was still undergoing peer review.
 
2012-05-13 01:15:40 PM
So let me get this straight. Near slave wages are OK if they are Mexican?

Ps you. Don't need Mexicans for harvest. You need harvestors.
 
2012-05-13 01:16:54 PM
jbuist: Average pay for those jobs in Alabama was $12/hr according to one of the many articles we've greenlit around here on the subject.

$12 an hour to walk around in the heat and humidity doing manual labor or $7.25 an hour to work a cash register at McDonald's in a climate controlled building?

I'd do it for $18/hr

/first job was 12.50 an hour digging ditches. Wasn't so bad as long as it wasn't hot out.
 
2012-05-13 01:17:40 PM
Enigmamf: More of this backbreaking manual labor would likely have been automated at this point if it weren't for cheap, desperate labor.

Maybe, but not necessarily. There are some things machines are good at, but some things are much harder to automate. Most of these jobs that still employ actual people to do the labor, do so because machines are not advanced enough to do it yet. And it's not a lack of research dollars, because the DoD is also interested in machines that can do that kind of visual identification and precision coordination. It's simply that the technology isn't there yet. I wouldn't be surprised if it gets there in the next 10 years though.
 
2012-05-13 01:19:18 PM
Define artificially low wages. There was an earlier article (quick GIS couldn't find it, or I'd cite it) that reported on Idaho farmers who hired locals for $15 /hr + benefits and they had people walking off the job after the first day, as well as much lower performance. They were attempting to stimulate the local economy themselves, not discriminating against migrant workers, and even they couldn't get the help they needed.
There's a deeper problem than immigration laws and socialist policies here. The labor that these folks expect isn't cruel or out of proportion to payment, it's just hard. It's highly demanding, physically, and it requires a fortitude that may not be common to people who haven't done that kind of work for most of their lives. Growing up in the 90's, we threw hay bales for $0.15 a bale. And no benefits. Would I do that now? If I didn't have a job, yes, in a heartbeat.
This is about preference and expectation. Just like your $150,000 house may never be worth that again, your $40/hr job may no longer exist. It may be that doing what you have to to keep comemrce moving and to survive may include labor and lower wages. Socialist? Maybe. Survivalist? Definitely.
 
2012-05-13 01:21:27 PM
I'm fairly liberal but I don't really see this as the failure some are presenting it as. This is a good thing, it means the farmers and the government are going to have to address this issue of farm labor in a realistic and legal manner.

If farmers are planting less then it implies prices will rise, meaning they will have more money to pay legal workers, ta da. Or perhaps it will spur innovation of automated farming techniques, or maybe it will force the government to come up with a better temporary worker program which will allow immigrant laborers to come here and earn a fair wage in a safe manner instead of the current, exploitative situation. The point is they will actually have to come up with a real fix for this instead of allowing a system of virtual slave labor to operate as they look the other way. This is a good thing.
 
2012-05-13 01:21:53 PM
Enigmamf: More of this backbreaking manual labor would likely have been automated at this point if it weren't for cheap, desperate labor.

Uhh, no. Inventors have tried for years to make a mechanical tomato picker, and have failed repeatedly. A ripe tomato is too tender to have a mechanical device pick them off the plant, and since tomato plants produce fruit repeatedly, somehow the device has to figure out which fruit is ripe and which one isn't. In fact, that's why most fruit are picked by hand; unless you've got a plant that ripens all its fruit simultaneously, only the Mark One Eyeball has the capability of choosing the ripe ones without stripping the entire plant.

Besides, ALEC isn't trying to get the unemployed working in the fields; they want to put convicted prisoners to work for pennies a day. That way they have an unending pool of workers that a lot of the public wants to "work for their cell", and they don't have to pay them hardly anything. That way everyone's happy; see how that all works out?
 
2012-05-13 01:22:01 PM
The American economic system is addicted to exploitation of cheap labor and always has been. From slavery, to desperate immigrants from Eastern and Southern Europe, to the current crop of Hispanic and Asian immigrants. The pattern is always the same, the people doing the work are held in contempt and discriminated against mercilessly by the people who benefit from this cheap labor.

America is a Schizo place in desperate need of another revolution.
 
2012-05-13 01:22:16 PM
Nadie_AZ: BunkyBrewman: Thoguh: Man On A Mission: It's almost as if Americans won't work back-breaking labor for minimum wage or less. If your business plan depends of half-price labor, you need a new business plan. Blaming your own failure on an immigration law is ignoring your own problems.

This right here. It's not that American's won't do the work. It's that they won't do the work for artificially low wages and allow you to ignore labor laws.

You mean like the early 20th century?

Oh, the irony here is just too rich for me right now.

I ... what?

Isn't that when unions formed, companies made concessions, and (ultimately) laws were passed to codify those concessions?


I meant *before* the unions formed. We're on the same page here.

/fine, 19th century then
 
2012-05-13 01:23:00 PM
We had these articles all over the place last year about labor shortages and crops rotting in fields. When there were no shortages in produce and prices didn't budge we strangely did not have any follow up stories. Expect the same this year.
 
2012-05-13 01:23:36 PM
As you sow, so shall you reap.
 
2012-05-13 01:23:56 PM
GTMD2B: There was an earlier article (quick GIS couldn't find it, or I'd cite it) that reported on Idaho farmers who hired locals for $15 /hr + benefits and they had people walking off the job after the first day, as well as much lower performance.

I think most of that has to do with people not being used to that level of labor. You take a guy who thinks mowing the lawn with a push mower is a major chore and stick him in a field chances are you can't pay him enough to get him to stick around.
 
2012-05-13 01:24:07 PM
Weaver95: ALEC has a solution to that as well - fire office workers and outsource skilled labor to china and india. then hire the former office workers and tech people to work in the fields. and they'll do it because SOCIALISMS! plus, we can just rework the old serfdom rules and slap a modern shine on 'em. one or two slick advertising campaigns later and they'll LINE UP to join!

/this is what Republicans actually believe.


That is what Chairman Mao, Pol Pot, and Robert Mugabe actually did. It worked about as well as you could expect.

/we don't really have the excuse of not knowing what will happen
//no, doing the same thing in the US will not produce a different result
 
2012-05-13 01:26:40 PM
BunkyBrewman: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Cagey B: Is there a "Law of Obvious and Predictable Consequences"?

It's more of a suggestion, really

It hasn't even made it to the Theory stage yet?


I thought this was just their Intelligent Design......
 
2012-05-13 01:27:55 PM
If they can't find enough labor, then they aren't offering enough pay for the work. Sure, Americans may demand better pay to do such hard work, but too bad. That's how supply and demand work. If someone has the chance to do much easier work for a comparable or higher wage, why would they take a job working on the fields? Raise the wages high enough, and people will do it, same as people do other "hard" jobs like fishing in Alaska when the pay is good.

Or, they could figure out a way to do the work without depending on a cheap supply of easily exploitable workers, just like every other industry in the developed world. Greater automation, more technology, larger scale, etc. works better than whining.
 
2012-05-13 01:29:12 PM
jbuist: Thoguh: This right here. It's not that American's won't do the work. It's that they won't do the work for artificially low wages and allow you to ignore labor laws.

Average pay for those jobs in Alabama was $12/hr according to one of the many articles we've greenlit around here on the subject.


i3.kym-cdn.com

You're new to the world of migrant labor, aren't you?

Growing up in California's central valley, here's how the system works. Basically, since you're hiring illegal, undocumented workers, you can tell the government you're paying your workers whatever the Hell you want to tell them. There's no paper trial in terms of taxes. You have a couple of legal workers on the payroll, of course, but most of the migrant workers are hired as day labor. Day labor and 'independent contractors' don't have to be listed on a payroll, just the amount paid. If you claim, say $40,000 a year in payroll for farm workers who are 'contractors' and can be paid in cash, you can claim you've paid 4 people $10,000 each when you really paid 40 people $1,000 each. In the meantime, the few documented workers you have bump your hourly wage numbers and can be pointed to as 'proof'.

This is how the game is played. And it's why meaningful immigration reform will never actually happen. Democrats play to the migrant worker base, farm owners are mainly Republicans and don't want to lose the cheap labor. Alabama just let their derp overrule the facts of how the ag business works these days, and they're gonna play the price in lost crops. And Monsatto will eventually swoop in and buy up all those troubled farms for pennies on the dollar.
 
2012-05-13 01:30:01 PM
sharkbeagle: Just charge $12 for a tomato. Whole Foods will bang your doors down.

The tomato problem has already been solved. Behold the HC290 Tomato Harvester.
 
2012-05-13 01:31:06 PM
DrewCurtisJr: We had these articles all over the place last year about labor shortages and crops rotting in fields. When there were no shortages in produce and prices didn't budge we strangely did not have any follow up stories. Expect the same this year.

Perhaps because 90% of the produce in my local supermarket is from Mexico, Brazil or Monaco.
 
2012-05-13 01:31:18 PM
farkreader007: If only there was another group of people who live in the deep south who have a history of agriculture harvesting.

Ok, I laughed.
 
2012-05-13 01:31:27 PM
Tatterdemalian: Weaver95: ALEC has a solution to that as well - fire office workers and outsource skilled labor to china and india. then hire the former office workers and tech people to work in the fields. and they'll do it because SOCIALISMS! plus, we can just rework the old serfdom rules and slap a modern shine on 'em. one or two slick advertising campaigns later and they'll LINE UP to join!

/this is what Republicans actually believe.

That is what Chairman Mao, Pol Pot, and Robert Mugabe actually did. It worked about as well as you could expect.

/we don't really have the excuse of not knowing what will happen
//no, doing the same thing in the US will not produce a different result


That's the exact opposite of what Mao did.
 
2012-05-13 01:31:46 PM
Bendal: Enigmamf: More of this backbreaking manual labor would likely have been automated at this point if it weren't for cheap, desperate labor.

Uhh, no. Inventors have tried for years to make a mechanical tomato picker, and have failed repeatedly. A ripe tomato is too tender to have a mechanical device pick them off the plant, and since tomato plants produce fruit repeatedly, somehow the device has to figure out which fruit is ripe and which one isn't. In fact, that's why most fruit are picked by hand; unless you've got a plant that ripens all its fruit simultaneously, only the Mark One Eyeball has the capability of choosing the ripe ones without stripping the entire plant.

Besides, ALEC isn't trying to get the unemployed working in the fields; they want to put convicted prisoners to work for pennies a day. That way they have an unending pool of workers that a lot of the public wants to "work for their cell", and they don't have to pay them hardly anything. That way everyone's happy; see how that all works out?


Mechanical tomato harvesters exist...they simply consume the whole plant and rely on varieties where most of the fruit is ripe all at once. There is some loss in productivity at the gain of less labor being needed. Depends where your costs are.

And given enough economic incentive, robots could be created to do almost any menial task. There just hasn't been that incentive yet for most fruits and vegetables.
 
2012-05-13 01:31:58 PM
BunkyBrewman: The unintended consequence is that we are going to be importing more produce from South of the Border.

Well that's ok because unregulated pesticides and growth hormones are some of my favorite food additives. I do enjoy them.
 
2012-05-13 01:32:02 PM
farkreader007: If only there was another group of people who live in the deep south who have a history of agriculture harvesting.

Oh no you didn't.

/yes you did
//that's just cold
 
Displayed 50 of 260 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report