If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Good: Obese third grader who was taken by CPS loses 52 lbs while living with his uncle. Bad: His mom wins custody back. Worse: He has already put seven lbs back on   (news.yahoo.com) divider line 139
    More: Sad, CPS, Department of Children, Cuyahoga County, breathing problems, family services, Ohio, STATE LIST, uncles  
•       •       •

15270 clicks; posted to Main » on 11 May 2012 at 12:17 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



139 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-05-11 01:27:19 PM
RexTalionis: Benevolent Misanthrope: Holy Fark - what the everloving fark is she feeding him?

One can only guess it's buttered lard.


www.straighttothebar.com

/hot, like chicken-fried lard.
 
2012-05-11 01:28:54 PM
/always win at the "guess my weight" things at the fair

"Step right up and win some crap!"
/Navin Johnson

After you see even slight results exercise becomes almost fun.

^^ YOGI, BOO-BOO, YOGI, BOO-BOO, YOGI, BOO-BOO, YOGI, BOO-BOO,...^^
 
2012-05-11 01:32:09 PM
I should probably add that I quit smoking 2 months ago(after a decade ... one of the hardest things I've ever done), which is also when the gains started adding up much faster.

/what-do-ya-know, smoking and exercise/lifting don't mix ... whodathunkit?
//actually, it inhibits muscle growth.
///themoreyouknow.jpg
 
2012-05-11 01:32:57 PM
http://blog.massivehealth.com/infographics/Carbs_are_killing_you/

Put the boy in ketosis.
 
2012-05-11 01:39:02 PM
Article doesn't say how tall the kid is. Maybe he's 6'5". Weight sounds about right to me.
 
2012-05-11 01:40:18 PM
proteus_b: D_Evans45: Even exercise that isnt strenuous is great for losing weight. I know a lot of people are so afraid to lose weight because of that ominous exercise monster. After you see even slight results exercise becomes almost fun. Even if youre lazy, you can do a bit of beneficial light exercise and see results.

I do exercise a few times a week, and I'm just kind of kidding with my posts---of course if I really wanted, I would have to either drink less or eat less or exercise more.

But actually I think strenuous exercise in general is a terrible formula for weight loss for most people, because they easily make up the difference in calories by eating a little bit extra, since they feel hungrier and entitled to on account of the exercise. For most people, learning to not eat when they're not hungry (and stopping to eat some hours before bedtime) is probably much more important than even incorporating any exercise, since it's possible to exercise strenuously several times a week and still be a fatbody, while someone who eats less than they burn, no matter how much they exercise, will lose weight.


I agree so much. I'm all about exercising because it is my understanding that it is good for my body. BUT, will just doing some crazy exercise regime and still eating whatever you want make you lose weight? Probably not. After an hour of swimming I am starving. It makes calorie counting or controlling what you eat even more important (because if you don't eat decent food you won't have the energy to exercise). For me, the most important parts of maintaining my weight are 1. Not eating when I'm not hungry and never getting to "OMG I"M STARVING" and 2. Going to bed at least a little hungry
 
2012-05-11 01:42:47 PM
netweavr: Father: "Unknown" is damned near inexcusable for a society that claims to have the technology to identify lineage from a single strand of hair or drop of blood.

Often "father unknown" means "I know who he is. I don't want to have to co-parent because I like being in charge".
 
2012-05-11 01:54:07 PM
RexTalionis: Benevolent Misanthrope: Holy Fark - what the everloving fark is she feeding him?

One can only guess it's buttered lard.


Sugar is more likely. I defy anyone to put on weight eating nothing but fat (and no carbs).
 
2012-05-11 01:55:27 PM
American Civil Liberties Union attorney James Hardiman, who represented the mother, told the judge that since returning to Cleveland the boy has received a free membership to a local YMCA, a Big Brother assignment through the Big Brothers, Big Sisters program and the county will pay for half of the cost of weekly cooking classes for his family.

WTF is this sh*t?!

Yanno... the ACLU does so much awesome stuff for civil right and whatnot but then does sh*t like this that makes me hate their whackjob asses.

Also at his low weight of 166 he still outweighed me.

/full grown man
 
2012-05-11 02:03:13 PM
SweetSilverBlues: A few accidents does not bad parenting make. Chronic incidents with a pattern do.

If those three hospitalizations happened because of the same situation, then that's at risk parenting and you do need to be investigated.


I just put a playset and a trampoline outside in the backyard. Say my son falls off the monkey bars of the playset and breaks his leg? Or my daughter misteps on the trampoline and breaks something. What if both children got injured within six months of each other? Understand that this fits your standard. If you expect a government institution to show common sense - clearly you don't pay enough attention. If the decision is made that a government authority has the right to bring a case against someone - they will. Fishing for stats is how many justify the increases in budgets they seek (or simply defend their budget in times of cutbacks). And in this instance there was an extended family willing to step in. What about the other cases. Do you think your average foster care is any better suited to deal with special needs? And if they end up in a state run juvie facility? How do you think that goes for the kid?

Your expectation of normality may actually be the problem, here.

FarkinHostile: Plain and simple, this is child abuse.


It's a tough one, though, as many parents as just ignorant of proper nutrition and healthy lifestyle. They don't take care of themselves, how can they be expected to take proper care of a child? Nevermind the mentally ill parents.

Yet anyone can have as many babies as they want or even don't want.

Jesus Wept.


See, here's the thing: In the United States, the Department for Children And Families (DCF) define child maltreatment as any act or series of acts of commission or omission by a parent or other caregiver that results in harm, potential for harm, or threat of harm to a child.

Giving a baseball bat to your child is abuse by that standard. Putting your child in a car is an action that can result in potential harm or the threat of harm. Every thing you can do fits that definition. But let's take a look at your comment about how this woman doesn't even know - so if she is behaving in a manner that fits in her life (say she is obese) how is it not her right to raise an obese child. If it's ok for her to be obese - clearly it must be ok for him to be. That's not abuse, it's stupidity.

I don't see the big deal if a kid is 200 lbs. I don't see the big deal if a fourth grader drops dead of a heart attack on the playground of his school. I get that you don't like this - but who should have to care what you like?

Should she raise her child like this? I would say no. Should you and anyone else say that she can't? I would say no again. This isn't sexual abuse. This isn't physical abuse (stop and don't bother, it isn't - physical abuse is hitting, kicking, biting, pushing, etc.). This isn't emotional abuse. This is bad parenting but only by my standard of parenting. Is this worse than these mothers who plaster their family on TV for toddlers and tiaras or Teen Mom? Not to me. Hell, why not take a pregnant teen away from her family. If she's still considered a minor by law, that's bad parenting. Force her to give birth in a state facility. Why not?

Because why is it my concern? Why do so many of you feel compelled to pretend to care about this kid or that you know better. If you had a picture of this kid you'd be mocking him mercilessly with funny captions or putting his address on the internet so you could all take turns ordering pizzas to his house. Plenty of you are overweight by your own admissions. Plenty of you binge drink or drink heavily by your own admission. Plenty of you would down a cheeseburger rather than a salad with a nice sauteed whitefish - so why do other people have to live to a standard that most of them don't farking live up to? Because they don't like themself? That seems farked up to say the least.
 
2012-05-11 02:03:48 PM
proteus_b: D_Evans45: Even exercise that isnt strenuous

But actually I think strenuous exercise in general is a terrible formula for weight loss for most people, because they easily make up the difference in calories by eating a little bit extra, since they feel hungrier and entitled to on account of the exercise. For most people, learning to not eat when they're not hungry (and stopping to eat some hours before bedtime) is probably much more important than even incorporating any exercise, since it's possible to exercise strenuously several times a week and still be a fatbody, while someone who eats less than they burn, no matter how much they exercise, will lose weight.


I didn't say strenuous exercise, I said "even exercise that isn't strenuous."

While I agree it is certainly VERY important to learn to control your cravings, I dont agree with the rest of your advice. I didn't become completely motivated to lose weight until I saw the changes exercising was bringing onto my body.

I was losing weight from portion control certainly, but it was a slow process that wasn't drastically producing results. Once I started to see how effective exercise was, it got me much more excited about losing weight. I wanted to get in shape faster; I was pissed you can only work muscles every other day. It became waaaay easier not to eat.

If you exercise enough during the day, you can eat like a pig. I do it all the time.

/Used to be just over 200, dropped to 155 in about 3 months
//165 and muscle base now
 
2012-05-11 02:05:32 PM
Looking back at that post, it is a bit rambunctious on the exercise bit. You can certainly lose tons of weight and see amazing results, just by cutting your portions down. And learning to control your cravings is paramount.
 
2012-05-11 02:12:06 PM
meat0918: MYitAt4: meat0918: Sounds like me. Eat till I hurt, and then finish off whatever the kids didn't eat. I stopped that and lost 20 lbs in a year, but put them back on rather quickly, then I just did smaller portions, and have lost that 20 plus an extra 30.

I mean I lost that 20 lbs again and an extra 10 for a total of 30.

If I lost 50lbs, that would put me at 175, and at 6'2" with very little muscle mass, I'd worry I'd look sick.

I'm 6'3'' and 170.... 8 (

there their theyre: meat0918: meat0918: Sounds like me. Eat till I hurt, and then finish off whatever the kids didn't eat. I stopped that and lost 20 lbs in a year, but put them back on rather quickly, then I just did smaller portions, and have lost that 20 plus an extra 30.

I mean I lost that 20 lbs again and an extra 10 for a total of 30.

If I lost 50lbs, that would put me at 175, and at 6'2" with very little muscle mass, I'd worry I'd look sick.

I'm 6'1" and 140lbs, no one would say I look sick.

You know, I think I just stumbled upon something else. Worrying about looking too thin.

And in retrospect, I was 170 at 6'2" with little muscle mass at 17, and aside from not turning the ladies' heads because I wasn't a football or basketball player, I did not look sick.


I'm with you I'm 6'2", about 225 and when I was 170 lbs I was very skinny with little or no muscle. I could stand to lose a bit of gut, but if I got below 200 again I'd have to lose quite a bit of muscle
 
2012-05-11 02:35:08 PM
jst3p: netweavr: Father: "Unknown" is damned near inexcusable for a society that claims to have the technology to identify lineage from a single strand of hair or drop of blood.

Often "father unknown" means "I know who he is. I don't want to have to co-parent because I like being in charge".


It would also mean that she wasn't bleeding some poor, put-upon schmuck dry with child support. I thought MRAs liked that.
 
2012-05-11 02:38:18 PM
D_Evans45: I was losing weight from portion control certainly, but it was a slow process that wasn't drastically producing results. Once I started to see how effective exercise was, it got me much more excited about losing weight. I wanted to get in shape faster; I was pissed you can only work muscles every other day. It became waaaay easier not to eat.

what kind of exercise were you doing?
 
2012-05-11 02:51:29 PM
Mangoose:

Every thing you can do fits that definition.

Yeah, well,when the entire medical profession (and just about everyone else) agrees that obesity is harmful, that goes a little beyond a simple opinion.

But let's take a look at your comment about how this woman doesn't even know - so if she is behaving in a manner that fits in her life (say she is obese) how is it not her right to raise an obese child. If it's ok for her to be obese - clearly it must be ok for him to be. That's not abuse, it's stupidity.

Agreed, but we stop/legislate against harmful stupidity all the time. Faith healer instead of doctor when the kid is sick? If the kid dies, parent gets charged. This is similar.

I don't see the big deal if a fourth grader drops dead of a heart attack on the playground of his school.

Really?

I get that you don't like this - but who should have to care what you like?

This is a telling point. Quite true in the grand scheme of things. I do try to keep this in mind.

Should she raise her child like this? I would say no. Should you and anyone else say that she can't? I would say no again.


Why not? When there is COMPELLING evidence that a child is being harmed, and obesity is physically and mentally harmful, of that there is no debating, why shouldn't someone say something? Even court ordered nutrition classes would be a positive thing. I'm not advocating taking the kid away and putting it in a home, just MAKE the parent learn.


This isn't physical abuse (stop and don't bother, it isn't - physical abuse is hitting, kicking, biting, pushing, etc.
).

Neglect is physical abuse, and doesn't entail any of that.

This isn't emotional abuse.

Tell that to the fat kid who is embarrassed to shower after gym. Tell that to the fat kid who gets picked on every day. Tell that to the fat kid who can't get a date to the prom. Because his mother is an ignorant cow.


This is bad parenting but only by my standard of parenting. Is this worse than these mothers who plaster their family on TV for toddlers and tiaras or Teen Mom? Not to me. Hell, why not take a pregnant teen away from her family. If she's still considered a minor by law, that's bad parenting. Force her to give birth in a state facility. Why not?

Bad parenting is not the same as abuse, whither it is from ignorance or design. Show "medical" harm, and it's abuse. Obesity is "medical" harm.


Because why is it my concern? Why do so many of you feel compelled to pretend to care about this kid or that you know better.


Come on now, we DO know better than to allow a child to become dangerously obese.

If you had a picture of this kid you'd be mocking him mercilessly with funny captions or putting his address on the internet so you could all take turns ordering pizzas to his house.

Humor is a way to cope with ugly aspects of reality. And I wouldn't because I was a fat kid. I wish someone had taught my mom proper nutrition. I had to do that on my own, and years later that I should have.


Plenty of you are overweight by your own admissions. Plenty of you binge drink or drink heavily by your own admission. Plenty of you would down a cheeseburger rather than a salad with a nice sauteed whitefish - so why do other people have to live to a standard that most of them don't farking live ...

Well, when I make a child binge drink or drink heavily you will have a point. I wouldn't, nor would I make a child obese. I'm not talking chubby, I'm talking about obese. That is abuse, IMNSHO. If a parent lets their child smoke cigarettes, they would be in trouble, and obesity is quite possibly WORSE than smoking!

Once that kid becomes an adult, they can make their own choices. But until then it is the duty of parents to not hurt through action or inaction their children.


I like the idea of court ordered nutrition classes with medical supervision for obese children and their parents. I don't mind my taxes going to education.
 
2012-05-11 02:58:48 PM
"The boy is now 9 years old and weighs 173 lbs (78 kg), up from a low of 166 lbs before he returned to his mother's home."

So did he gain the 7 lbs after he got with mommy or before?
 
2012-05-11 02:59:07 PM
meat0918: WhippingBoy: ihatedumbpeople: from the details in the article, I'm guessing this isn't some hormonal issue causing him to gain weight, so she just has to be allowing him (enabling or forcing...) to eat WAAAY more than he needs.

How can a "hormonal issue" cause you to gain weight??? Does it cause the ambient calores present in the air to be absorbed through your skin or something?

If your brain doesn't get the "I'm full" signal, or you get it but it doesn't stay on and you eat more 30 minutes later, yeah, the body does strange things.

Sometimes I wonder if it's not the brain saying, "Hmm, stomach's full, same with intestines... What's with all this sugar and water? Where's all the other stuff I need to survive! Better signal hungry again and find me more food!"


The explanation I was given for the phenomenon you describe was that there are basically two separate ways for your stomach to start telling your brain to stop eating. First you can consume the required nutrients, which will stop the signals from being sent. Alternatively there are stretch receptors in the stomach itself that send a signal to indicate that the stomach is physically full.

So let's say you need nutrients. Hunger signals are being sent to the brain. Eating a bunch of junk food will never turn off the signal, because you aren't actaully getting any nutrients. You can block the signal though, by cramming so much mass into the stomach that it trips the 'She's gonna blow!' alarm.

Once some of the stomach contents get processed, the emergency stop signal stops, and you go right back to feeling hungry - because you never actually stopped being hungry, your body just couldn't fit any more mass into your gut.

This is also why people keep getting fatter and fatter - the stomach itself gets stretched out over time, so it takes more and more to set off the 'physically stuffed' alarms.
 
2012-05-11 03:06:06 PM
proteus_b: D_Evans45: I was losing weight from portion control certainly, but it was a slow process that wasn't drastically producing results. Once I started to see how effective exercise was, it got me much more excited about losing weight. I wanted to get in shape faster; I was pissed you can only work muscles every other day. It became waaaay easier not to eat.

what kind of exercise were you doing?



I started jogging on my lunch breaks at first, once I saw results it encouraged me into to general fitness like situps and pushups.

I had a very irrational fear of exercise until I saw results. Much of the population harbors this same fear of exercise. People just need to realize it isn't as hard as you think it is. And once you actually start to do it, it becomes so easy, that you want to do it.
 
2012-05-11 03:15:38 PM
 
2012-05-11 03:26:47 PM
lennavan:
Here's the thing, taken literally this statement is really stupid.


No, it's not. It's pretty freaking obvious. Here, let me show you.


My kid has been in the hospital three times. I guess that makes me a serial offender?


Kid in hospital three times because he plays sports and bangs his body around: That's OK. "Healthy injury."

Kid in hospital three times because he has a chronic health problem like asthma or epilepsy: That's OK. "Good medical care."

Kid in hospital three times for malnourishment (which this kid is) you're a douchebag and in need of state intervention.

Context, it's not just for breakfast anymore.


Something on the order of "if stupid parenting is putting the kid in the hospital." How do you define "stupid parenting" and who gets to define it?


I'm going to start with a third grader that weighs more than I do and has been hospitalized as a result. We can work back from there. You can claim "we don't know where the line is" and that's fine and dandy. What you can not deny is that there *is* a line, and this kid is way, way, way over on the other side of it.
 
2012-05-11 03:27:16 PM
WhippingBoy: QT_3.14159: WhippingBoy: How can a "hormonal issue" cause you to gain weight??? Does it cause the ambient calores present in the air to be absorbed through your skin or something?

Actually, since hormones regulate our system they can in fact trigger our bodies to store calories instead of burn them. They can also trigger constant "hunger" signals and drive you to continue to eat.

Right now there are doctors helping middle aged women lose all kinds of weight, just by adjusting their hormone levels.

I guess noticing that you're gaining weight and then adjusting your exercise level/food intake before you gain *too* much weight isn't the "quick fix" so many people are desperate for...


Try that while having untreated hypothyroidism. Enjoy not being able to do anything else because you're too damn tired.
 
2012-05-11 03:32:31 PM
whitey_d: I'm with you I'm 6'2", about 225 and when I was 170 lbs I was very skinny with little or no muscle. I could stand to lose a bit of gut, but if I got below 200 again I'd have to lose quite a bit of muscle


The "Get below XX amount of pounds" isn't a very effective way to approach your weight loss. Your height is irrelevant, the amount of fat on you is what matters. You can lose all your fat without becoming a weakling easily.
 
2012-05-11 03:48:08 PM
FarkinHostile: Mangoose:

Every thing you can do fits that definition.

Yeah, well,when the entire medical profession (and just about everyone else) agrees that obesity is harmful, that goes a little beyond a simple opinion.

But let's take a look at your comment about how this woman doesn't even know - so if she is behaving in a manner that fits in her life (say she is obese) how is it not her right to raise an obese child. If it's ok for her to be obese - clearly it must be ok for him to be. That's not abuse, it's stupidity.

Agreed, but we stop/legislate against harmful stupidity all the time. Faith healer instead of doctor when the kid is sick? If the kid dies, parent gets charged. This is similar.

I don't see the big deal if a fourth grader drops dead of a heart attack on the playground of his school.

Really?

I get that you don't like this - but who should have to care what you like?

This is a telling point. Quite true in the grand scheme of things. I do try to keep this in mind.

Should she raise her child like this? I would say no. Should you and anyone else say that she can't? I would say no again.


Why not? When there is COMPELLING evidence that a child is being harmed, and obesity is physically and mentally harmful, of that there is no debating, why shouldn't someone say something? Even court ordered nutrition classes would be a positive thing. I'm not advocating taking the kid away and putting it in a home, just MAKE the parent learn.


This isn't physical abuse (stop and don't bother, it isn't - physical abuse is hitting, kicking, biting, pushing, etc.).

Neglect is physical abuse, and doesn't entail any of that.

This isn't emotional abuse.

Tell that to the fat kid who is embarrassed to shower after gym. Tell that to the fat kid who gets picked on every day. Tell that to the fat kid who can't get a date to the prom. Because his mother is an ignorant cow.


This is bad parenting but only by my standard of parenting. Is this worse than these mothers who plaster their family on TV for toddlers and tiaras or Teen Mom? Not to me. Hell, why not take a pregnant teen away from her family. If she's still considered a minor by law, that's bad parenting. Force her to give birth in a state facility. Why not?

Bad parenting is not the same as abuse, whither it is from ignorance or design. Show "medical" harm, and it's abuse. Obesity is "medical" harm.


Because why is it my concern? Why do so many of you feel compelled to pretend to care about this kid or that you know better.

Come on now, we DO know better than to allow a child to become dangerously obese.

If you had a picture of this kid you'd be mocking him mercilessly with funny captions or putting his address on the internet so you could all take turns ordering pizzas to his house.

Humor is a way to cope with ugly aspects of reality. And I wouldn't because I was a fat kid. I wish someone had taught my mom proper nutrition. I had to do that on my own, and years later that I should have.


Plenty of you are overweight by your own admissions. Plenty of you binge drink or drink heavily by your own admission. Plenty of you would down a cheeseburger rather than a salad with a nice sauteed whitefish - so why do other people have to live to a standard that most of them don't farking live ...

Well, when I make a child binge drink or drink heavily you will have a point. I wouldn't, nor would I make a child obese. I'm not talking chubby, I'm talking about obese. That is abuse, IMNSHO. If a parent lets their child smoke cigarettes, they would be in trouble, and obesity is quite possibly WORSE than smoking!

Once that kid becomes an adult, they can make their own choices. But until then it is the duty of parents to not hurt through action or inaction their children.


I like the idea of court ordered nutrition classes with medical supervision for obese children and their parents. I don't mind my taxes going to education.


I think people are failing to acknowledge something important here: this kid wasn't just fat, he was having-a-hard-time-breathing fat. Look up Pickwickian Syndrome and tell me allowing a kid to get to that stage isn't as bad as starving a kid or letting them live in squalor. Neglect is a perfectly god reason to remove a child from their home.
 
2012-05-11 03:56:18 PM
D_Evans45: whitey_d: I'm with you I'm 6'2", about 225 and when I was 170 lbs I was very skinny with little or no muscle. I could stand to lose a bit of gut, but if I got below 200 again I'd have to lose quite a bit of muscle


The "Get below XX amount of pounds" isn't a very effective way to approach your weight loss. Your height is irrelevant, the amount of fat on you is what matters. You can lose all your fat without becoming a weakling easily.


No, that was in response to the people who are saying they are 6' + and
 
2012-05-11 03:57:42 PM
whitey_d: D_Evans45: whitey_d: I'm with you I'm 6'2", about 225 and when I was 170 lbs I was very skinny with little or no muscle. I could stand to lose a bit of gut, but if I got below 200 again I'd have to lose quite a bit of muscle


The "Get below XX amount of pounds" isn't a very effective way to approach your weight loss. Your height is irrelevant, the amount of fat on you is what matters. You can lose all your fat without becoming a weakling easily.

No, that was in response to the people who are saying they are 6' + and


Not sure what happened to the rest of my post, but I meant to say:

No, that was in response to the people who are saying they are 6' + and
 
2012-05-11 03:59:02 PM
whitey_d: whitey_d: D_Evans45: whitey_d: I'm with you I'm 6'2", about 225 and when I was 170 lbs I was very skinny with little or no muscle. I could stand to lose a bit of gut, but if I got below 200 again I'd have to lose quite a bit of muscle


The "Get below XX amount of pounds" isn't a very effective way to approach your weight loss. Your height is irrelevant, the amount of fat on you is what matters. You can lose all your fat without becoming a weakling easily.

No, that was in response to the people who are saying they are 6' + and

Not sure what happened to the rest of my post, but I meant to say:

No, that was in response to the people who are saying they are 6' + and


Goddamit I quit
 
2012-05-11 04:18:31 PM
southparkstudios.mtvnimages.com
 
2012-05-11 04:20:19 PM
Naesen: [southparkstudios.mtvnimages.com image 480x360]

erm... that was only a hotlinked image of Cartman when I started...
 
2012-05-11 04:31:35 PM
ihatedumbpeople: from the details in the article, I'm guessing this isn't some hormonal issue causing him to gain weight, so she just has to be allowing him (enabling or forcing...) to eat WAAAY more than he needs. I may be mistaken but I think it's roughly...what...3500 calories are equal to a pound? he's basically packing in 3 days worth of calories every day, maybe more.

That's pretty much what CPS said, which is actually why I'm confused as to why they're letting her take charge. Maybe it's the programs she and the son are doing--that certainly would help a lot, especially the Big Brothers Big Sisters mentorship. It could be that they were suspicious about how fast the kid was losing weight, too. 2 lbs a week is fairly extreme.

Overall, though, what the unholy fark is CPS thinking?
 
2012-05-11 04:34:28 PM
Rent Party: Kid in hospital three times because he plays sports and bangs his body around: That's OK. "Healthy injury."

Kid in hospital three times because he has a chronic health problem like asthma or epilepsy: That's OK. "Good medical care."

Kid in hospital three times for malnourishment (which this kid is) you're a douchebag and in need of state intervention.

Context, it's not just for breakfast anymore.


His statement contained zero consideration for context. I'm glad in your super pouty disagreement with me, you actually completely agreed with me.

Rent Party: What you can not deny is that there *is* a line

There is no single line, context matters. Remember? We just agreed on it and now you returned to pouty madness disagreeing with me. What's with you dude? Can't we all just get along?

Rent Party: this kid is way, way, way over on the other side of it.

Wouldn't it be really shocking yet funny if it turned out I already posted this sentiment previously in the thread? Yeah, it would.
 
2012-05-11 05:02:35 PM
lennavan: Rent Party: Kid in hospital three times because he plays sports and bangs his body around: That's OK. "Healthy injury."

Kid in hospital three times because he has a chronic health problem like asthma or epilepsy: That's OK. "Good medical care."

Kid in hospital three times for malnourishment (which this kid is) you're a douchebag and in need of state intervention.

Context, it's not just for breakfast anymore.

His statement contained zero consideration for context. I'm glad in your super pouty disagreement with me, you actually completely agreed with me.


His statement didn't need it as it is so freaking obvious it isn't worth talking about, unless you're a moron that says stupid shiat like "Well my kid has been in the hospital three times so I must be a shiatty parent," as if that is any kind of statement at all.

If your kid is so fat he's in the hospital as a result, you're a shiatty parent.


There is no single line, context matters. Remember? We just agreed on it and now you returned to pouty madness disagreeing with me. What's with you dude? Can't we all just get along?


And yet, you continue to say stupid shiat like "Well gosh, who's to say what being a shiatty parent is?"

Make up your farking mind. Is it, or is it not, appropriate for the state to intervene with a parent who's child is so malnourished that it requires hospitalization?
 
2012-05-11 05:12:58 PM
Rent Party: His statement didn't need it as it is so freaking obvious

That's the way to pass legislation. Write it and whatevs, it's so freaking obvious. That worked out great for Florida's Stand your Ground Law, didn't it? It's so freaking obvious it doesn't mean if a kid comes walking on front of your truck while youre at a drive through you can shoot him dead on the spot. No one would ever claim Stand Your Ground like that. Ridiculous.

It's like Don't Ask Don't Tell. When that was passed, it wasn't like that was going to be abused, it was a nice way to let gays stay in the military. No one would possibly abuse that law, it was by no means meant as a method to remove gays from the military, it was meant to allow them to serve. There are zero cases of abuse there, it was super duper obvious.

Rent Party: Make up your farking mind. Is it, or is it not, appropriate for the state to intervene with a parent who's child is so malnourished that it requires hospitalization?

Wouldn't it be really farking awkard if you kept hammering this question when it turned out I had already addressed it previously in the thread? And then I hinted at it and you still kept hammering rather than search and find my post? That'd be awkward. But do you know what would be SUPER awkward? If there was clear evidence you read the post I addressed it in the thread because you quoted a different part of that post. That'd be SUPER awkward.

SUPER awkward.
 
2012-05-11 10:30:23 PM
FarkinHostile:

Yeah, well,when the entire medical profession (and just about everyone else) agrees that obesity is harmful, that goes a little beyond a simple opinion.


I'm not going to argue against the medical opinion that obesity is bad for you. This is not me saying that obesity is not as bad as people say it is.

Agreed, but we stop/legislate against harmful stupidity all the time. Faith healer instead of doctor when the kid is sick? If the kid dies, parent gets charged. This is similar.

I know there are growing instances of doctors taking children away from religious people for treatment - but do doctors do that when it comes to someone who believes that vaccines are harmful?

Really?

Yes and no. I'm not without sympathy but the point stands that this is none of my business. How many people do you think would pass this woman and child in the street and call CPS? But now that he has breathing problems? Is obese but not with trouble breathing make it ok? Does any obese person not have trouble breathing at some point?

Even court ordered nutrition classes would be a positive thing. I'm not advocating taking the kid away and putting it in a home, just MAKE the parent learn.

Then I agree with you completely. Well, almost. The parent may very well be a lost cause. Make the parent learn for the child if you can. If not make the child learn. Kids do that well. However, give authority an inch and they will hang you from the nearest tree. That was my upbringing.

Neglect is physical abuse, and doesn't entail any of that.

No. Neglect is actually not considered physical abuse. Neglect is the charge brought if there is no intention to harm but someone could have done something to different. Like talking on the phone when your child hurts themselves.

Tell that to the fat kid who is embarrassed to shower after gym. Tell that to the fat kid who gets picked on every day. Tell that to the fat kid who can't get a date to the prom. Because his mother is an ignorant cow.

That's not on him. How the world shiats on him is on the world, not him. Sure he could conform to our standards but if we start forcing that on people?

Can you imagine if a some jurisdiction decided that a family that came to terms with a child's homosexuality were neglecting the child? Authority makes the determination based on precedent and precedent alone. One court determines a lifestyle is wrong, another attempts to apply it in the same manner. Where do you stop telling people what they legally can do? (also, yes I am going to extremes to make a point - but I also do believe that there is a reasonable bridge between the two)

Bad parenting is not the same as abuse,

It is in this instance.

Come on now, we DO know better than to allow a child to become dangerously obese.

Not all of us apparently. This ties to education point you make. Also, are there not health issues tied to moderately overweight people?

Humor is a way to cope with ugly aspects of reality. And I wouldn't because I was a fat kid. I wish someone had taught my mom proper nutrition. I had to do that on my own, and years later that I should have.

Would you, looking back on it, be ok with CPS coming and removing you from your mother's care? This will tie back into your last point, too. I mean, my parents were. Well they weren't the greatest of parents. They did their best. They provided for us and loved us in their way, but fark it - they smoked around us, they let us run wild as long as we got away with it, they never really bothered with things like talks and heart to hearts, at least not with me and I don't talk to my brothers so I guess I wouldn't know if they did it for them and just got bored of it when it came to me. I'd still rather have been raised by them than foster and/or state care.

Well, when I make a child binge drink or drink heavily you will have a point. I wouldn't, nor would I make a child obese. I'm not talking chubby, I'm talking about obese. That is abuse, IMNSHO. If a parent lets their child smoke cigarettes, they would be in trouble, and obesity is quite possibly WORSE than smoking!

Few of us our as healthy as we would like to be, was my point. And my prior question about health issues with just moderately overweight people stands. And smoking and obesity are equally bad, I would say. I used to smoke. In the declining stages of my marriage(which I guess would be my marriage in it's farking entirety), I started smoking again. I never once smoked around my children. Because, my parents used to smoke around us. Any wonder that all three kids of their kids ended up smokers? You raise yours, they raise theirs.

I read an article, considering what I was going through at the time it was like a lightning strike, about how hard it is to make someone with a mental illness actually see they have a mental illness. Sometimes the hardest person to convince to change is the person that needs it.

I like the idea of court ordered nutrition classes with medical supervision for obese children and their parents. I don't mind my taxes going to education.

Now that is a solution to a problem, not a creation of more problems for people other than this one case. And get them in early and often. Have medical communities contacting when something like this starts. Not when he's starting to have trouble breathing. Try to get them to make the right decision. If they can't then, this is what is going to happen.

And after trying it the hard way, they give her a legal validation.
 
2012-05-11 11:18:14 PM
D_Evans45: Add up the calories from your 4 beers and see your excess intake everyday. Maybe work to eliminate reasonable amounts from your portions during the day to make up for your drinks at night.

I once knew a woman who effectively did this to maintain her weight while still going out every night. I've never seen someone in her early 20s look so unhealthy. Turns out that while you can maintain your weight while drinking that much, your body doesn't actually thrive getting half your calories from alcohol and mixers.
 
2012-05-11 11:29:14 PM
219 pounds at 7?

Even if he was tall for his age, that's 3 times as much as a 7 year old should probably weigh. I'm being generous, because it's more likely closer to 4 times as much.

We're not talking a few extra pounds of chub. We're not talking an adult, where for many weighing 219 would be overly heavy but not by eclipsing their ideal body weight by a couple times. We're talking a little kid who doesn't know better being given obviously very poor eating choices by his primary child provider. the fact he lost 52 pounds in 7 months with his uncle hammers home that it was most likely preventable.
 
2012-05-12 12:48:46 AM
I feed my family healthy low carb, low saturated fat foods and it's not just for health reasons. It's because I don't want my daughter being teased and bullied because she is fat. I understand that health is important but fat kids get badly teased and bullied and I don't want my daughter to go through that.

My sister was always fat as a child and the bullying and teasing led to a lot of emotional problems later in life. She ended up having very little self respect and confidence in herself, especially in respect to relationships with the opposite sex and as such ended up with a lot of nasty boyfriends. I on the other hand was slim and could really pick and choose so I ended up with nice respectful boyfriends and more self confidence.

I did gain weight in my mid 30s but I am losing it now and guess how I did it.

Stopped eating white carbs = bread, pasta, rice, potatoes, noodles and cakes and do you know what I learned.

Speaking to my mum she told me you never ate your potatoes or your bread etc.

When I got home from school I wouldn't have a sandwich, I would have an egg in a cup. I was skinny as a child and once questioned by a doctor when I was about 24 if I was anorexic but I actually ate a low carb diet out of choice - not even trying to lose weight. I'm now eating a low carb diet again and I like it and don't even miss carbs. My sister ate bread and pasta and all that stuff and guess what she was fat but is losing a bit of weight.

No the shiat other kids put fat kids through is something any parent would try and avoid.
 
2012-05-12 05:00:44 PM
RexTalionis: The Stealth Hippopotamus: TFA: American Civil Liberties Union attorney James Hardiman, who represented the mother, told the judge that since returning to Cleveland the boy has received a free membership to a local YMCA, a Big Brother assignment through the Big Brothers, Big Sisters program and the county will pay for half of the cost of weekly cooking classes for his family.

One quick question, did the uncle have to be come a freeloader in order to help this child?

Bad move DHS bad move. The kid lost a lot of weight for just being under the uncle's care for 7 months, maybe too much weight. Losing nearly 2 pounds a week for that many weeks is very extreme. But being as heavy as he was and being a kid it may not be that extreme. But I bet you that the kid never ended up in the hospital because of the treatment the uncle was giving him.

Uncle needs to start making videos.

I think that once you're at a certain level of obesity, it's probably pretty easy to lose a lot of weight pretty quickly. A friend of mine who was 270 lbs was eating north of 4000 calories a day just to maintain his weight. Once he cut that down to 2000 calories, he lost 20 pounds in a very short time.


You actually made some sense out of that post? It was just word soup.
 
2012-05-12 07:42:10 PM
jst3p: netweavr: Father: "Unknown" is damned near inexcusable for a society that claims to have the technology to identify lineage from a single strand of hair or drop of blood.

Often "father unknown" means "I know who he is. I don't want to have to co-parent because I like being in charge".


Seriously, is that what it is? Suddenly, it becomes a little clearer...

/Never had to ask why black women are often single
 
Displayed 39 of 139 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report