If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WorldNetDaily)   Leftists' oppressive seatbelt laws must end now   (wnd.com) divider line 20
    More: Hero, Patrick Henry, second mortgages, seat belts, mandates, moral hazard, free country, Occupational Safety and Health, Association of American Physicians  
•       •       •

2997 clicks; posted to Politics » on 09 May 2012 at 7:44 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-05-09 08:10:56 PM  
3 votes:

misanthropicsob: When did Stossel move to Wing Nut Daily?


WND is now the refuge for the pedo-mustache brigade.
2012-05-09 05:18:10 PM  
3 votes:
AND DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THOSE LIBTARDS' PROPERLY INFLATED TIRES!!1!
2012-05-09 04:59:37 PM  
2 votes:

Snarcoleptic_Hoosier: Rapmaster2000: FirstNationalBastard: Those laws aren't about safety... they're about revenue. If the government couldn't make money off ticketing you for not wearing a seatbelt, do you think they would give a fark if you wore a seatbelt?

And when Billy Bob gets ejected in a rollover and he's stuck on life support for months, I have to pay for it out of my taxes once his insurance runs out which steals money from more responsible citizens for medicaid and from SS and food stamps to pay for his kids because the kinds of people who are too irresponsible to wear a seat belt to be their for their children aren't generally the kinds of people responsible enough to get life insurance.

I elected this government and I want the government to force irresponsible people to be responsible as long as I have to pay for irresponsibility.

Let's have an opt out policy. I'll let people sign away the regulations that require them to wear a seatbelt. They tattoo "DO NOT RESUSCITATE" on their chests. Everybody wins.

Nice try commie. Like I'll support paying for someone else's tattoo! Let the market determine how many idiots get branded with the stupid.


Next, they'll be requiring us to pay for those annoying roadside crosses with their teddy bears and plastic flowers!
2012-05-09 10:33:46 PM  
1 votes:
You know I just noticed this, but is there a male writer for WND who doesn't have a gay porn 'stache?
2012-05-09 09:33:31 PM  
1 votes:
wiki.urbandead.com
Don't hate the playa, hate the game. Biotches!

//GIS "john stossel douchebag"
2012-05-09 08:51:30 PM  
1 votes:
Thanks A Lot Beltbama
2012-05-09 08:38:07 PM  
1 votes:
www.mghs.sa.edu.au

Anyone else think of this Onion article about Chrysler's neckbelts?
2012-05-09 08:10:37 PM  
1 votes:
Damn right.

I'm pretty sure seat belt laws were pushed by insurance companies and we all know what a wacky bunch of leftists they are.
2012-05-09 08:04:30 PM  
1 votes:

misanthropicsob: When did Stossel move to Wing Nut Daily?


...in what can only be described as a life- and career-validating promotion...
2012-05-09 07:59:56 PM  
1 votes:
2012-05-09 07:55:46 PM  
1 votes:

Raoul Eaton: Jubeebee: FirstNationalBastard: Those laws aren't about safety... they're about revenue. If the government couldn't make money off ticketing you for not wearing a seatbelt, do you think they would give a fark if you wore a seatbelt?

This right here.

The police used to run a seatbelt checkpoint on the corner of my old place. They'd have officers standing at the intersection, shining flashlights into peoples cars at a 4 way stop. Both streets were 25mph limits, in a quiet suburban neighborhood.

That's not safety, that's a cash grab. If you want to give someone an extra ticket for not having a seatbelt on when you pull them over for speeding on the highway, fine. But peering into people's cars in a residential neighborhood has nothing to do with safety.

Ever hit your head against a hard object at 25 m.p.h.? Did it feel slow then?


im sure he would afterwards.
2012-05-09 07:49:52 PM  
1 votes:
please, please, PLEASE, conservatives - take off your oppressive liberal seatbelts!
2012-05-09 07:46:56 PM  
1 votes:
Why won't the government deregulate murder already?
2012-05-09 06:59:09 PM  
1 votes:
If toddlers really don't want to be raped, they can simply fight back.
2012-05-09 05:19:30 PM  
1 votes:
I'm being oppressed by my anti-lock brakes.
2012-05-09 04:51:12 PM  
1 votes:

Rapmaster2000: FirstNationalBastard: Those laws aren't about safety... they're about revenue. If the government couldn't make money off ticketing you for not wearing a seatbelt, do you think they would give a fark if you wore a seatbelt?

And when Billy Bob gets ejected in a rollover and he's stuck on life support for months, I have to pay for it out of my taxes once his insurance runs out which steals money from more responsible citizens for medicaid and from SS and food stamps to pay for his kids because the kinds of people who are too irresponsible to wear a seat belt to be their for their children aren't generally the kinds of people responsible enough to get life insurance.

I elected this government and I want the government to force irresponsible people to be responsible as long as I have to pay for irresponsibility.

Let's have an opt out policy. I'll let people sign away the regulations that require them to wear a seatbelt. They tattoo "DO NOT RESUSCITATE" on their chests. Everybody wins.


Nice try commie. Like I'll support paying for someone else's tattoo! Let the market determine how many idiots get branded with the stupid.
2012-05-09 04:31:48 PM  
1 votes:

FirstNationalBastard: Rapmaster2000: Aarontology: I'm fine with that.

Just deny medical treatment for anyone whose injuries would have been prevented by wearing a seat belt.

FREEDOM!

Oh, and I'm 100% fine with that.

I'm opposed to seat belt laws, helmet laws, drug laws. Just understand that when you become a vegetable, we're pulling the plug. Your personal freedom over your body doesn't extend to my wallet.

Those laws aren't about safety... they're about revenue. If the government couldn't make money off ticketing you for not wearing a seatbelt, do you think they would give a fark if you wore a seatbelt?


They make more money off living seatbelt wearers than dead non-seatbelt wearers.

Less money spent scraping body parts off the road.

Less money spent on repairing decapitations in the ER.
2012-05-09 04:29:52 PM  
1 votes:
What about bootstraps? Are they still mandatory?
2012-05-09 04:19:56 PM  
1 votes:
Yes please.

Then tell idiots that read WND that Fartbongo is about to ban people from parking on highways with the driver door facing fast moving traffic.
2012-05-09 04:18:11 PM  
1 votes:
John Stossel- king of fake outrage. Really? Seat belts?
 
Displayed 20 of 20 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report