If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Washington Times)   Unborn fetuses are not people. Unless their pregnant mother is visiting the White House, then they count as people   (washingtontimes.com) divider line 78
    More: Stupid, White House, National Right to Life, SSN, Mr. Johnson, fetus, White House correspondent, business directory  
•       •       •

2891 clicks; posted to Politics » on 09 May 2012 at 10:10 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



78 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-05-09 03:39:33 AM  
Politifact says otherwise, submitter.
 
2012-05-09 04:08:18 AM  

Bathia_Mapes: Politifact says otherwise, submitter.

"This refers to a pregnant woman providing information for a tour in the future that will include the new family member. So when a 7-month pregnant woman is providing information for a tour that is 4 months in the future, there is a 'place holder' for the new baby," Donovan wrote in an email.


And... we're done here.
 
2012-05-09 04:09:36 AM  
Second part not intended to quote the esteemed Bathia_Mapes, but the article to which she links.
 
2012-05-09 08:26:23 AM  
Subby, if you'll just keep in mind from here on out that The Washington Times is worthless filth with no redeeming qualities, information, or purpose, written by idiots and published by morons and read by halfwits, you'll prevent yourself from looking quite so astoundingly stupid next time.
 
2012-05-09 08:32:47 AM  
Why are we greenlighting this?
 
2012-05-09 08:41:24 AM  

Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Why are we greenlighting this?


Because it will pick a fight on the Politics tab about abortion, especially if people don't read the article.
 
2012-05-09 08:49:18 AM  

Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Why are we greenlighting this?


Because it's a hilariously stupid news item, and this is Fark.
 
2012-05-09 08:54:30 AM  

James!: Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Why are we greenlighting this?

Because it's a hilariously stupid news item, and this is Fark.


Drew needs money to buy another tanker of Heineken, eh?
 
2012-05-09 08:58:26 AM  
media.washtimes.com

lol wut
 
2012-05-09 09:00:50 AM  
Butthurt has arrived early for some, I see.
 
2012-05-09 09:15:09 AM  

Sock Ruh Tease: [media.washtimes.com image 469x70]

lol wut


Moonies.

www.cultnews.com
 
2012-05-09 09:30:02 AM  
"It is ironic that President Obama's staff recognizes the existence of unborn babies for purposes of providing security within the White House - yet, there is no indication that President Obama has any problem with the fact that throughout the District of Columbia, abortion is now legal for any reason up to the moment of birth," Mr. Johnson said in a statement.

1) Not ironic.

2) Perfectly reasonable and sensible policy.

3) Moonies suck.
 
2012-05-09 09:31:24 AM  

Because People in power are Stupid: Sock Ruh Tease: [media.washtimes.com image 469x70]

lol wut

Moonies.

[www.cultnews.com image 291x363]


Awwww, look at the crazy cultists that are horrifically bad parents (and people in general). Do they like dressing up in white and playing with crowns? Yes they do!
 
2012-05-09 09:42:34 AM  
Oh, c'mon! It was debunked before it even got greened! WTF?
 
2012-05-09 09:55:12 AM  

Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: James!: Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Why are we greenlighting this?

Because it's a hilariously stupid news item, and this is Fark.

Drew needs money to buy another tanker of Heineken, eh?


If you can't laugh you may as well cry.
 
2012-05-09 09:59:25 AM  
This means the Rev. Moon is crowned "International Prince of Peace and Everlasting Messiah", and Obama has to fry papusas at a restaurant in Mt. Pleasant.
 
2012-05-09 10:15:51 AM  
OMG Obama is secretly anti-abortion
 
2012-05-09 10:16:22 AM  

Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Why are we greenlighting this?


LOOK AT THOSE HIPPOCRITICAL LIBTARDS, BEIN' ALL LIBTARDED!!!!

/That's why
//I clicked the thread
///I'm part of the problem
 
2012-05-09 10:16:42 AM  

Sock Ruh Tease: [media.washtimes.com image 469x70]

lol wut


They bought the rights to this year.
 
2012-05-09 10:16:53 AM  
FTA: that the policy for unborn infants takes into account that a child might be born between the time that its parents request a tour and the time that the tour actually takes place.

Requiring parents to register their unborn child "serves as a placeholder," said spokesman Max Milien. He said the policy helps "to expedite the process" when parents arrive for a tour with a baby that has been born recently.


It takes MONTHS to get a spot to tour the WH.
 
2012-05-09 10:17:14 AM  
fta: Requiring parents to register their unborn child "serves as a placeholder," spokesman Max Milien said. He said the policy helps "to expedite the process" when parents arrive for a tour with a baby who has been born recently

Oh, FFS.

When did the Washington Times turn into a FWD FWD FWD email?

Society already has decided on how best to balance the rights of the unborn and the rights to a women having the choice to carry to term of not.

Thing is, it's a zero sum game up to a point.

Sad part is they think they are being so clever with this crap.
 
2012-05-09 10:17:45 AM  
Politics tab today is a much bigger train wreck than usual.
 
2012-05-09 10:18:50 AM  
I've been on the white house tour. Went during Bush I's term. Got to see him take off on Marine One, which was kind of cool.

Oh... there's an article? Well, okay then.
 
2012-05-09 10:18:58 AM  
Ok we now have FoxNews, American Thinker, twitchy, Townhall and The Washington Times as the top 5 links. I'm guessing WND next. Maybe Breitbart.
 
2012-05-09 10:19:28 AM  
Being against the idea of abortion being legal and accessible is an immature position held by naive people who are also usually hypocrites because more often then not these people have zero foster or adopted kids in their care.
 
2012-05-09 10:20:38 AM  

Philip Francis Queeg: Ok we now have FoxNews, American Thinker, twitchy, Townhall and The Washington Times as the top 5 links. I'm guessing WND next. Maybe Breitbart.


Was just coming back to observe this fact.

Whacko Wednesday?
 
2012-05-09 10:22:18 AM  

Sock Ruh Tease: lol wut


They had a party about it. They were invited! Punch was served!
 
2012-05-09 10:22:56 AM  

Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Why are we greenlighting this?


Because the Modmins are in Megasuper Troll mode today.

/Banned in 3... 2... 1...
 
2012-05-09 10:24:00 AM  

Relatively Obscure: Bathia_Mapes: Politifact says otherwise, submitter.

"This refers to a pregnant woman providing information for a tour in the future that will include the new family member. So when a 7-month pregnant woman is providing information for a tour that is 4 months in the future, there is a 'place holder' for the new baby," Donovan wrote in an email.

And... we're done here.


Can we just keep re-quoting this, instead of feeding trolls?
 
2012-05-09 10:24:33 AM  

Philip Francis Queeg: Ok we now have FoxNews, American Thinker, twitchy, Townhall and The Washington Times as the top 5 links. I'm guessing WND next. Maybe Breitbart.


Is it Friday already?
 
2012-05-09 10:25:05 AM  

MindStalker: It takes MONTHS to get a spot to tour the WH.


People need to understand that your DC vacation needs to be planned entirely around your tour of the WH waaaaaay in advance. You just can't show up at 8am and expect to get a ticket for an afternoon tour. You have to lock that ish up before you even book your flight.
 
2012-05-09 10:25:17 AM  
I'm sorry, when did the White House say fetuses never develop into children? I must have missed that one.
 
2012-05-09 10:25:23 AM  

vernonFL: This means the Rev. Moon is crowned "International Prince of Peace and Everlasting Messiah", and Obama has to fry papusas at a restaurant in Mt. Pleasant.


Isn't a papusa a Native American child? Truly, he is history's greatest monster.

/ and right-to-lifers are history's greatest retards. Well, other than the entire GOP.
 
2012-05-09 10:25:42 AM  
Can they make political contributions?
 
2012-05-09 10:26:01 AM  

The RIchest Man in Babylon: Relatively Obscure: Bathia_Mapes: Politifact says otherwise, submitter.

"This refers to a pregnant woman providing information for a tour in the future that will include the new family member. So when a 7-month pregnant woman is providing information for a tour that is 4 months in the future, there is a 'place holder' for the new baby," Donovan wrote in an email.

And... we're done here.

Can we just keep re-quoting this, instead of feeding trolls?

 
2012-05-09 10:26:11 AM  
FT"It is ironic that President Obama's staff recognizes the existence of unborn babies for purposes of providing security within the White House - yet, there is no indication that President Obama has any problem with the fact that throughout the District of Columbia, abortion is now legal for any reason up to the moment of birth," Mr. Johnson said in a statement.>

Translation:We're drumming up outrage at some low level clerical decision made many years ago because we have a constituency stupid enough to not be able to figure this out themselves.

Like Obama mulled the counting of feti decison over in his head, called a cabinet meeting, consulted his secret muslim brothers, his radical christian preachers, and sat there like an idiot while simultanesouly putting in action a master plan that would make Machiavelli proud.
 
2012-05-09 10:26:54 AM  
Uggg..fail. Apologies
 
2012-05-09 10:27:11 AM  
White House anchor babies.
 
2012-05-09 10:27:29 AM  

Relatively Obscure: And... we're done here.


you would think so right?

But I'm guessin not so much
 
2012-05-09 10:34:04 AM  
A spokesman for the Secret Service said all visitors to the White House are required to provide identification "regardless of age," and that the policy for an unborn child takes into account that a child might be born between the time parents request a tour and the time that the tour actually takes place.

Policy based on an actual problem?

Example 2: Unborn Children

A household was originally income qualified based on the inclusion of an unborn child. Four months later, the pregnancy ended in miscarriage. It is not necessary to certify the remaining household as a new tenant at the time of the miscarriage. If the income of the remaining household members exceeds 140 percent of the income limit (170 percent in deep rent-skewed projects) at the next income recertification, the Available Unit Rule is applicable.
 
2012-05-09 10:35:55 AM  
What if you're pregnant with twins, but you didn't know it was twins? What if one of them is good and the other is evil? WHAT THEN?
 
2012-05-09 10:36:58 AM  

Pocket Ninja: Subby, if you'll just keep in mind from here on out that The Washington Times is worthless filth with no redeeming qualities, information, or purpose, written by idiots and published by morons and read by halfwits, you'll prevent yourself from looking quite so astoundingly stupid next time.


Really?!? The Times is the only paper with the guts to tell the truth. I still remember that the Times was the only paper, back in the late 1980's, that had the cojones to write about the secret army the Soviets were assembling in El Salvador, ready to rush through Central American and into the soft underbelly of the USA.
 
2012-05-09 10:37:07 AM  

Wyalt Derp: What if you're pregnant with twins, but you didn't know it was twins? What if one of them is good and the other is evil? WHAT THEN?


Sarah Palin is President and Obama must build Moon Base Gingrich with his bare hands and no pressure suit.
 
2012-05-09 10:37:47 AM  

Wellon Dowd: Pocket Ninja: Subby, if you'll just keep in mind from here on out that The Washington Times is worthless filth with no redeeming qualities, information, or purpose, written by idiots and published by morons and read by halfwits, you'll prevent yourself from looking quite so astoundingly stupid next time.

Really?!? The Times is the only paper with the guts to tell the truth. I still remember that the Times was the only paper, back in the late 1980's, that had the cojones to write about the secret army the Soviets were assembling in El Salvador, ready to rush through Central American and into the soft underbelly of the USA.


I bet all those bootstrappy Texans and Arizonans would be thrilled at being called the "soft underbelly of America".
 
2012-05-09 10:43:19 AM  
So, The Washington Times, American Thinker, Town Hall, FOX News and some site talking about "tolerant liberals' death threats".

I'm off to Reddit. Catch you tomorrow.
 
2012-05-09 10:44:19 AM  

qorkfiend: Wellon Dowd: Pocket Ninja: Subby, if you'll just keep in mind from here on out that The Washington Times is worthless filth with no redeeming qualities, information, or purpose, written by idiots and published by morons and read by halfwits, you'll prevent yourself from looking quite so astoundingly stupid next time.

Really?!? The Times is the only paper with the guts to tell the truth. I still remember that the Times was the only paper, back in the late 1980's, that had the cojones to write about the secret army the Soviets were assembling in El Salvador, ready to rush through Central American and into the soft underbelly of the USA.

I bet all those bootstrappy Texans and Arizonans would be thrilled at being called the "soft underbelly of America".


They seems scare shiatless by the sight of a Mexican carrying a bindle. I can't imagine what they'd do if they saw a bunch of them with kalashnikovs.
 
2012-05-09 10:44:32 AM  

Wyalt Derp: What if you're pregnant with twins, but you didn't know it was twins? What if one of them is good and the other is evil? WHAT THEN?


Guantamano.
 
2012-05-09 10:46:21 AM  

James!: Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: James!: Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Why are we greenlighting this?

Because it's a hilariously stupid news item, and this is Fark.

Drew needs money to buy another tanker of Heineken, eh?

If you can't laugh you may as well cry.


I'm already dead on the inside. At least someone could let some sunshine pour through my empty husk.
 
2012-05-09 10:54:05 AM  

Relatively Obscure: Bathia_Mapes: Politifact says otherwise, submitter.

"This refers to a pregnant woman providing information for a tour in the future that will include the new family member. So when a 7-month pregnant woman is providing information for a tour that is 4 months in the future, there is a 'place holder' for the new baby," Donovan wrote in an email.

And... we're done here.


The actual article even says this at the end, after saying something else at the beginning.

Of course, we probably can't insult the Moonie Times here any more, considering Drew takes their money now (Moon owns UPI as well as the Washington Times).
 
2012-05-09 10:54:41 AM  

Sock Ruh Tease: [media.washtimes.com image 469x70]

lol wut


They're sponsored by the Mayan Apocalypse?
 
Displayed 50 of 78 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report