If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNSNews)   Bowling for abortions   (cnsnews.com) divider line 216
    More: Misc, bowling balls, abortions, biology  
•       •       •

9631 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 May 2012 at 4:37 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



216 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-05-08 07:39:35 PM
Masquerader317: Soiled Underwear: pnome: Imagine the macabre procedure that is going to be. Here we have a woman, @ 36 weeks. Could have a C-section and we'd give the baby human rights no problem. But instead she changes her mind and decides for a "late term abortion" (AKA Infanticide, at least in my book). The baby is perfectly healthy, could easily live outside the womb. But mom and doc can go ahead and kill it?

So, exactly how does that work? Is does the doctor going to cut the baby out and then cut it's little throat? And if it takes a breath, does it count as birthed then?

Typically they pull the foetus out and snip its spinal cord.

/watched the procedure in college
//pretty wild


[lh4.googleusercontent.com image 512x384]

0/10

It's times like this I wish I believed in a god just so I could pray the Serenity prayer. I guess I'll have to settle for alcohol.

/Why do you put crap out there like this? You know someone is going to believe you, don't you? FFS...


Whether you want to believe me or not is up to you, but it was a voluntary assignment for a philosophy course at EKU. We watched a 16mm film from the 80s which showed multiple procedures (at different points in the pregnancy) being performed and that was what they did for what appeared to be a 9 month foetus. There were things that occurred before and after that in the procedure but by that point the bible-thumpers were literally screaming in the classroom at the Professor and the people telling them to be quiet. Film narration was in German (maybe Dutch?) so I'm not entirely sure of the age.

/Assignment was extra credit.
//I can't believe it's been 15 years now
///feels bad man
 
2012-05-08 07:39:36 PM
i.imgur.com
 
2012-05-08 07:42:55 PM
Damn it that should've been 70s not 80s for the period the film is from.
 
2012-05-08 07:43:47 PM
I realize I'm going against the general flow here, but I don't care.

At the moment those two sets of DNA combine, that is a human being. To intentionally kill that is to kill a person. That person has done nothing to you to warrant some sort of self-defense, so to kill that person is murder.

"This is my body and I can do what I want with it." That's right. It is your body. And, unless you were raped, you've already decided what you'll allow to happen to your body. Now, that little person inside of you? That constellation of cells is THEIR body. You do NOT have a right to destroy their body, especially when your only reason for doing so is because allowing them to live would be inconvenient for you.

Call me a hate-monger if you like. Your calling me an inaccurate name doesn't affect what the truth is. That person growing in the womb has done nothing to deserve death, and you have no right to deal death to them.
 
2012-05-08 07:44:19 PM
That Dietrich Von Bacon guy is killing it in the comments, long may he wave.
 
2012-05-08 07:45:15 PM
The only thing wrong with this is that the girl couldn't get the medical care she needed because she didn't have the cash.

In any civilized country, abortions and birth control should be free, and freely available to all.
 
2012-05-08 07:47:36 PM
Did they put the bumpers up?

Rubber babby buggy bumpers?
 
2012-05-08 07:48:21 PM
The My Little Pony Killer: Terrydatroll: RabidRythmDivas: hdhale: RabidRythmDivas: The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves: pnome: When do human rights begin?

At birth, just as Jesus intended.

Actually, the Bible tells us it's more like 1 or 2 months after birth.

That is some fantastic troll bait. Catch much with it?

No troll. Just Biblical fact. Leviticus 27:6. Numbers 3:15-16.

Babies aren't considered persons until after they are one month old.

The Jews wrote the Bible and they say it is at conception. Just saying....

As far as the girl. I really didn't know it was legal to abort 14 year olds....could have saved me a lot of trouble and expense.

Haha, no. The Jews say three days after birth.


"You're not a person until you're in my phone book" -Bill Hicks
 
2012-05-08 07:50:00 PM
Soiled Underwear: Whether you want to believe me or not is up to you, but it was a voluntary assignment for a philosophy course at EKU. We watched a 16mm film from the 80s which showed multiple procedures (at different points in the pregnancy) being performed and that was what they did for what appeared to be a 9 month foetus. There were things that occurred before and after that in the procedure but by that point the bible-thumpers were literally screaming in the classroom at the Professor and the people telling them to be quiet. Film narration was in German (maybe Dutch?) so I'm not entirely sure of the age.

/Assignment was extra credit.
//I can't believe it's been 15 years now
///feels bad man


Well. I'm calling it. Bullshiat. Your phillosophy professor was showing an actual snuff film, then? Because the procedure you describe is known as pithing, and it's considered to be murder.
 
2012-05-08 07:50:28 PM
Benni K Rok: Did they put the bumpers up?

Rubber babby buggy bumpers?


Bumping is how the little trollop got into this condition..
 
2012-05-08 07:54:53 PM
BronyMedic: murder.


The m word is so ugly. Lets call it cell growth rate control steps instead.
 
2012-05-08 07:56:30 PM
BronyMedic: Soiled Underwear: Whether you want to believe me or not is up to you, but it was a voluntary assignment for a philosophy course at EKU. We watched a 16mm film from the 80s which showed multiple procedures (at different points in the pregnancy) being performed and that was what they did for what appeared to be a 9 month foetus. There were things that occurred before and after that in the procedure but by that point the bible-thumpers were literally screaming in the classroom at the Professor and the people telling them to be quiet. Film narration was in German (maybe Dutch?) so I'm not entirely sure of the age.

/Assignment was extra credit.
//I can't believe it's been 15 years now
///feels bad man

Well. I'm calling it. Bullshiat. Your phillosophy professor was showing an actual snuff film, then? Because the procedure you describe is known as pithing, and it's considered to be murder.


That's cool dude. Have a nice day :)
 
2012-05-08 07:59:33 PM
The My Little Pony Killer: I'm okay with 14-year-olds not being forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term.

Tainted1: An abortion for a 14 year old? Thats about 57 trimesters late isnt it?

Tainted1 I would like you to meet TMLPK. He can explain the in's and out's of a 14 year-old.

We will probably need a different docent to explain parental, wishful prayers for postpartum birth termination. TMLPK can provide those introductions.
 
2012-05-08 08:00:16 PM
overmortal: I realize I'm going against the general flow here, but I don't care.

At the moment those two sets of DNA combine, that is a human being. To intentionally kill that is to kill a person. That person has done nothing to you to warrant some sort of self-defense, so to kill that person is murder.

"This is my body and I can do what I want with it." That's right. It is your body. And, unless you were raped, you've already decided what you'll allow to happen to your body. Now, that little person inside of you? That constellation of cells is THEIR body. You do NOT have a right to destroy their body, especially when your only reason for doing so is because allowing them to live would be inconvenient for you.

Call me a hate-monger if you like. Your calling me an inaccurate name doesn't affect what the truth is. That person growing in the womb has done nothing to deserve death, and you have no right to deal death to them.


3/10
 
2012-05-08 08:01:15 PM
overmortal: At the moment those two sets of DNA combine, that is a human being. To intentionally kill that is to kill a person. That person has done nothing to you to warrant some sort of self-defense, so to kill that person is murder.

And you just stand by and let it happen. Good job.
 
xcv
2012-05-08 08:03:17 PM
overmortal: I realize I'm going against the general flow here, but I don't care.

At the moment those two sets of DNA combine, that is a human being. To intentionally kill that is to kill a person. That person has done nothing to you to warrant some sort of self-defense, so to kill that person is murder.

"This is my body and I can do what I want with it." That's right. It is your body. And, unless you were raped, you've already decided what you'll allow to happen to your body. Now, that little person inside of you? That constellation of cells is THEIR body. You do NOT have a right to destroy their body, especially when your only reason for doing so is because allowing them to live would be inconvenient for you.

Call me a hate-monger if you like. Your calling me an inaccurate name doesn't affect what the truth is. That person growing in the womb has done nothing to deserve death, and you have no right to deal death to them.


Cool, I don't consider it a human being till at least a few weeks after birth based on nervous system development, but i accept the first 3 trimesters as the legal limit for abortion. And natural law is on my side given that infanticide was an acceptable practice for most of human history, a necessary evil to prevent the sufferings of overpopulation and unwanted children leading short, miserable lives of hunger and neglect.
 
2012-05-08 08:05:05 PM
overmortal: I realize I'm going against the general flow here, but I don't care.

At the moment those two sets of DNA combine, that is a human being. To intentionally kill that is to kill a person. That person has done nothing to you to warrant some sort of self-defense, so to kill that person is murder.

"This is my body and I can do what I want with it." That's right. It is your body. And, unless you were raped, you've already decided what you'll allow to happen to your body. Now, that little person inside of you? That constellation of cells is THEIR body. You do NOT have a right to destroy their body, especially when your only reason for doing so is because allowing them to live would be inconvenient for you.

Call me a hate-monger if you like. Your calling me an inaccurate name doesn't affect what the truth is. That person growing in the womb has done nothing to deserve death, and you have no right to deal death to them.


I had a miscarriage of a pregnancy that was very much wanted. Guess what? It wasn't a baby. Sure, it had legs and arms, but I know in my mind and heart it wasn't a baby. It was the potential for a baby. A fetus doesn't even approach viability or even feel pain until pretty much the fifth or sixth month. Surfactant isn't even in the lungs in any amount until that time, which is required for survival outside the womb, even with intensive medical treatment. I'm sorry you have been duped into thinking human DNA = baby.

/ignorant or troll?
//you decide, farkers
 
2012-05-08 08:05:28 PM
If 14 year olds stopped reproducing, CNS News would cease to exist.
 
2012-05-08 08:07:14 PM
The worst thing about abortion is that the placenta doesn't age properly. The sandwiches just end up with a fishy taste.
 
2012-05-08 08:15:33 PM
Debeo Summa Credo: superfudge73: Janusdog: Citrate1007: You're not helping.

No, actually they are. The less emotional we can be about something that is going to happen, and has good reasons to happen, and must be legal, the better.

I am honestly starting to tell people I am pro-abortion. Enough of the mealy mouthed, "oohhhh, no one likes abortion." Yeah, I do. Legal abortion keeps women safe and in control of their own body, since it's a human right.

So, wheeeee! Let's throw in a few Happy Bowling Meals too with fetus-shaped fries.

It also has caused a tremendous drop in crime rates in the US.

Exactly. I'm not pro-abortion because it protects women's rights or whatever, that's just a side benefit. I'm pro-abortion because if the mother doesn't want the baby it's much more likely that the baby is going to grow up to be a criminal or a leech on society. So kill away, ladies. I don't care if you call it a child, baby, fetus, embryo or what. Kill them farkers.



You are a new favorite to be sure. Honesty is always the best policy.
 
2012-05-08 08:15:34 PM
AllUpInYa: Benni K Rok: Did they put the bumpers up?

Rubber babby buggy bumpers?

Bumping is how the little trollop got into this condition..


Touche.

But saying Rubber Babby Buggy Bumpers is trickier than with Baby instead.
 
2012-05-08 08:26:03 PM
The Shatner Incident:
I had a miscarriage of a pregnancy that was very much wanted. Guess what? It wasn't a baby. Sure, it had legs and arms, but I know in my mind and heart it wasn't a baby. It was the potential for a baby. A fetus doesn't even approach viability or even feel pain until pretty much the fifth or sixth month. Surfactant isn't even in the lungs in any amount until that time, which is required for survival outside the womb, even with intensive medical treatment. I'm sorry you have been duped into thinking human DNA = baby.


You wanna tell me that the ability to feel pain is necessary to consider a being to be alive?

What about people with nervous system disorders?
 
2012-05-08 08:26:13 PM
davidphogan: The worst thing about abortion is that the placenta doesn't age properly. The sandwiches just end up with a fishy taste.

Tarter sauce and a spritz of lemon juice will cover it nicely.
 
2012-05-08 08:26:44 PM
I'd check the sources from anything that spewed out of CNS. They make FOX News look like Pravda.
 
2012-05-08 08:31:56 PM
Soiled Underwear: That's cool dude. Have a nice day :)

Keep lying about stuff on FARK. It amuses people who know how full of crap you are.

mikaloyd: The m word is so ugly. Lets call it cell growth rate control steps instead.

What he is describing has always been illegal. It's known as pithing. Federal law requires any baby born of a late-stage abortion which shows signs of life to be resuscitated. They cannot kill neonates if they show signs of life.

Abortion is not murder. That is.
 
2012-05-08 08:41:02 PM
AllUpInYa: The Shatner Incident:
I had a miscarriage of a pregnancy that was very much wanted. Guess what? It wasn't a baby. Sure, it had legs and arms, but I know in my mind and heart it wasn't a baby. It was the potential for a baby. A fetus doesn't even approach viability or even feel pain until pretty much the fifth or sixth month. Surfactant isn't even in the lungs in any amount until that time, which is required for survival outside the womb, even with intensive medical treatment. I'm sorry you have been duped into thinking human DNA = baby.

Alive /=/ viable. A tumor is alive if it has a blood supply. Don't hurt yourself by moving those goalposts by comparing it to a person already born with a nervous disorder. Here, have some Icy Hot. Those things look heavy.
 
2012-05-08 08:42:11 PM
How in the bugfark did that HTML get borked? My apologies for the screw-up. Oh, well. My point still stands.
 
2012-05-08 08:43:49 PM
BronyMedic: Soiled Underwear: That's cool dude. Have a nice day :)

Keep lying about stuff on FARK. It amuses people who know how full of crap you are.

mikaloyd: The m word is so ugly. Lets call it cell growth rate control steps instead.

What he is describing has always been illegal. It's known as pithing. Federal law requires any baby born of a late-stage abortion which shows signs of life to be resuscitated. They cannot kill neonates if they show signs of life.

Abortion is not murder. That is.


You are correct Brony. Murder is defined by law so if it is a legal abortion it is not murder. It is, however, causing death to a living creature regardless of the opinions governing when a fetus becomes a person and the application of it's human rights. Fortunately we live in a country where that subject can be debated. I personally think it should be the decision of the woman, not the government. I don't, however, believe that a single tax dollar should pay for it. I would rather my taxes went to support the living, not destroy the questionably human.
 
2012-05-08 08:47:30 PM
MEANWHILE, THE FATHER IS DOING... WHAT?

t3.gstatic.com
 
2012-05-08 08:53:30 PM
Terrydatroll: I don't, however, believe that a single tax dollar should pay for it. I would rather my taxes went to support the living, not destroy the questionably human.

Wow. You'd think this argument would have been settled a long time ago. But it still gets brought up daily.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Amendment

In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortions.[1] It is not a permanent law, rather it is a "rider" that, in various forms, has been routinely attached to annual appropriations bills since 1976. The Hyde Amendment applies only to funds allocated by the annual appropriations bill for the Department of Health and Human Services. It primarily affects Medicaid.
 
2012-05-08 08:59:08 PM
overmortal:
Call me a hate-monger if you like. Your calling me an inaccurate name doesn't affect what the truth is. That person growing in the womb has done nothing to deserve death, and you have no right to deal death to them.


You're right, I don't. But the pregnant woman does.

But wouldn't the world be a better place if we could all make up our own definitions of "person"? People like you wouldn't fit in my definition.
 
2012-05-08 09:08:44 PM
Punch her in the gut for a dollar.
 
2012-05-08 09:09:59 PM
RabidRythmDivas: overmortal:
Call me a hate-monger if you like. Your calling me an inaccurate name doesn't affect what the truth is. That person growing in the womb has done nothing to deserve death, and you have no right to deal death to them.

You're right, I don't. But the pregnant woman does.

But wouldn't the world be a better place if we could all make up our own definitions of "person"? People like you wouldn't fit in my definition.


Alas, you live in a society where you don't get to make the rules, just like he doesn't. The pregnant woman doesn't get to define these things either. People don't get to define these things for a reason, because people act on emotion and not logic.
 
2012-05-08 09:12:46 PM
Conservative intellectual and scientific kryptonite:

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you, The Hydatidiform mole
 
2012-05-08 09:14:01 PM
Outlaw abortion, legalize suicide.
 
2012-05-08 09:17:55 PM
kbotc: RabidRythmDivas: overmortal:
Call me a hate-monger if you like. Your calling me an inaccurate name doesn't affect what the truth is. That person growing in the womb has done nothing to deserve death, and you have no right to deal death to them.

You're right, I don't. But the pregnant woman does.

But wouldn't the world be a better place if we could all make up our own definitions of "person"? People like you wouldn't fit in my definition.

Alas, you live in a society where you don't get to make the rules, just like he doesn't. The pregnant woman doesn't get to define these things either. People don't get to define these things for a reason, because people act on emotion and not logic.


I vote, I petition, I protest, I express my opinion whenever possible, take every poll & survey I can, and debate in the public forum like this. I may not be the only one 'making the rules' in society, but I'm certainly not letting other people make them without my input.
 
2012-05-08 09:19:31 PM
Quasar: I hope they used a pink bowling ball as a metaphor for what could have been done to prevent this situation in the first place.

Wouldn't the brown ball be more appropriate for that purpose?
 
2012-05-08 09:28:42 PM
Arkanaut: Wouldn't the brown ball be more appropriate for that purpose?

Lets hope they remove the bumpers from the gutters
 
2012-05-08 09:36:52 PM
Huh, didn't know this organization existed. Good for them. Definitely will have to find some spare cash to donate.
 
2012-05-08 09:45:59 PM
Britney Spear's Speculum: Conservative intellectual and scientific kryptonite:

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you, The Hydatidiform mole


OK, but seriously, make mine a really small slice.
 
2012-05-08 09:46:56 PM
overmortal: I realize I'm going against the general flow here, but I don't care.

At the moment those two sets of DNA combine, that is a human being. To intentionally kill that is to kill a person. That person has done nothing to you to warrant some sort of self-defense, so to kill that person is murder.

"This is my body and I can do what I want with it." That's right. It is your body. And, unless you were raped, you've already decided what you'll allow to happen to your body. Now, that little person inside of you? That constellation of cells is THEIR body. You do NOT have a right to destroy their body, especially when your only reason for doing so is because allowing them to live would be inconvenient for you.

Call me a hate-monger if you like. Your calling me an inaccurate name doesn't affect what the truth is. That person growing in the womb has done nothing to deserve death, and you have no right to deal death to them.


2/10

because I'm sure somebody bit

/the fetus has no right to use my body to achieve its ends
//so neener neener
 
2012-05-08 09:47:55 PM
Title of this thread got me to thinking about an unusual twist on the Falcon Punch...
bbsimg.ngfiles.com
/with a bowling ball?
 
2012-05-08 09:49:04 PM
greyw1980: The My Little Pony Killer: I'm okay with 14-year-olds not being forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term.

Tainted1: An abortion for a 14 year old? Thats about 57 trimesters late isnt it?

Tainted1 I would like you to meet TMLPK. He can explain the in's and out's of a 14 year-old.

We will probably need a different docent to explain parental, wishful prayers for postpartum birth termination. TMLPK can provide those introductions.


I had no idea the 14 year old's parents were the ones carrying the fetus. Oh, and if you RTFA, you'd see that she DID have parental consent.

But whatever makes you feel superior, I suppose.
 
2012-05-08 09:58:30 PM
pnome: Imagine the macabre procedure that is going to be. Here we have a woman, @ 36 weeks. Could have a C-section and we'd give the baby human rights no problem. But instead she changes her mind and decides for a "late term abortion" (AKA Infanticide, at least in my book). The baby is perfectly healthy, could easily live outside the womb. But mom and doc can go ahead and kill it?

So, exactly how does that work? Is does the doctor going to cut the baby out and then cut it's little throat? And if it takes a breath, does it count as birthed then?


Well, fortunately for you, it doesn't exactly work that way:

a) Abortion past the point of viability (generally considered to be 25-26 weeks) is so incredibly regulated it's not funny, and ESPECIALLY in the third trimester.

b) In general, "third trimester abortions" are only done LEGALLY in cases where (in general) babby isn't going to survive out of utero--it's literally a a heartbreaking choice in most cases between giving birth to a stillborn infant (and in many cases, destroying mom's ability to "try again" if not outright killing her in the process) or having a second- or third-trimester abortion.

c) If something horrible happened during a pregnancy that would indicate a need for a third-trimester abortion at 36 weeks (and keep in mind that doctors do not hand out third-trimester abortions like candy; they require specific medical indications such as the fetus being non-viable and/or continuation of the pregnancy being a threat to the life of the mother) they will usually try to induce labour early or have a C-section if there's any indication that the pregnancy is viable.

d) There is all of ONE OB/GYN and one in training IN THE ENTIRETY OF THE US IF NOT NORTH AMERICA that have specific training and the willingness to perform third-trimester abortions, and again, restrict these to instances where babby is stillborn and/or continuing pregnancy threatens the life or health of the mother. (Yes, a 14-year-old forced to carry a large pregnancy to term could count, especially if babby has hydrocephaly or some other condition that could rule out vaginal birth or result in difficult birth.)

There used to be two doctors, but one of them got assassinated in his own church (as he was performing duties as a deacon) by the dominionist terrorist group the Army of God. Seeing as the Army of God is probably the most active domestic terrorist organisation in the US and has some rather active cells (with a long history of murder, arson, and even the occasional faux-weapons-of-mass-destruction mailing)--and attempts to actively crack down on their terrorism are cockblocked routinely by the Sinn Fein to the Army of God's IRA (namely, Operation Rescue, Operation Save America, and a number of other groups with provable ties to Army of God cell leaders)...let's just say not a whole lot of folks are willing to risk life, limb and martyrdom on a daily basis to allow safe access to late-trimester abortions in the US.
 
2012-05-08 10:02:33 PM
TofuTheAlmighty: pnome: When do human rights begin?

Define "human."


I prefer to go with the term "person". Just because something has human DNA doesn't make it intrinsically valuable. So I'd go with the point when they're self-aware and see themselves as a distinct individual.

Real question: what makes a newborn human more valuable than a cow or a chicken?
 
2012-05-08 10:03:50 PM
Cagey B: Thanks for the tip, CNS News. I'll make a donation to NNAF today.

Exactly what I'm doing right now. Sounds like a good cause to me.
 
2012-05-08 10:08:41 PM
Terrydatroll: I don't, however, believe that a single tax dollar should pay for it.

I don't believe that my tax dollars should go to pay for illegal wars.

So you can pretend your dollars go to the wars, and I'll pretend all of mine go to the abortions. Win/win!
 
2012-05-08 10:16:45 PM
pnome: When do human rights begin?

Just a few months later than human wrongs, apparently.
 
2012-05-08 10:18:13 PM
fusillade762: Real question: what makes a newborn human more valuable than a cow or a chicken?

You aren't helping.
 
2012-05-08 10:39:03 PM
"I'm pretty smart for 14, I think," Darcy writes.

Apparently,not smart enough to keep your pants on.
 
Displayed 50 of 216 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report