RobSeace: omeganuepsilon: RobSeace: Yeah, right we all follow that rule, don't we? Heh.

The do tend to get enforced though, that is the difference between Fark and 4chan. Many a person in these types of threads has been moderated for their posting "too much", as well as off topic and derail attempts.

Yeah, but my point was that particular rule I quoted is ridiculous and pretty much never enforced in these sort of threads... Seriously, do you think the stuff posted inline in this thread is all much tamer than SI swimsuit issue?? Here, you can usually get away with anything short of exposed nipple, genitals, or bare ass... But, it does depend on the mod on duty, and whether or not you've pissed someone off in the thread so that they start reporting you to the mods (in which case you often get the situation I loathe where some people get the rules enforced against them, while everyone else in the thread gets away with far worse than them with no punishment)...

But, the real point was: it's rather bizarre to complain about someone not following one rule in a thread where everyone else is breaking another rule! If we were all following all the rules, this thread would be empty or nothing but NSFW links...

Yeah yeah, I'm the one to latch onto something off topic.....
If I recall, I had to tell you before make with the boobs or STFU, and you complained about being banned for it and continued to argue off topic.
so...
Make with the boobs, talk about the boobs, or stfu.

omeganuepsilon: RobSeace: omeganuepsilon: RobSeace: Yeah, right we all follow that rule, don't we? Heh.

The do tend to get enforced though, that is the difference between Fark and 4chan. Many a person in these types of threads has been moderated for their posting "too much", as well as off topic and derail attempts.

Yeah, but my point was that particular rule I quoted is ridiculous and pretty much never enforced in these sort of threads... Seriously, do you think the stuff posted inline in this thread is all much tamer than SI swimsuit issue?? Here, you can usually get away with anything short of exposed nipple, genitals, or bare ass... But, it does depend on the mod on duty, and whether or not you've pissed someone off in the thread so that they start reporting you to the mods (in which case you often get the situation I loathe where some people get the rules enforced against them, while everyone else in the thread gets away with far worse than them with no punishment)...

But, the real point was: it's rather bizarre to complain about someone not following one rule in a thread where everyone else is breaking another rule! If we were all following all the rules, this thread would be empty or nothing but NSFW links...

Yeah yeah, I'm the one to latch onto something off topic.....
If I recall, I had to tell you before make with the boobs or STFU, and you complained about being banned for it and continued to argue off topic.
so...
Make with the boobs, talk about the boobs, or stfu.

I posted boobs before I posted pecs. I'm sorry it made you so angry, but sauce for the gander, sauce for the goose.

/only difference between pecs and tits is the amount of fat

tinfoil-hat maggie: Thudfark: tinfoil-hat maggie: Andrew Wiggin:

yeah. i blew my wad yesterday and this morning. all i have left are nekkies.

Heh, why do I get the feeling that actually happened several times over the last few days : )

Stock in Kleenex and Jergens rose dramatically?

Ya think?

Remind me to invest when I get a jerb

omeganuepsilon: ElStreak: Not a fan of the "Tupperware-with-skin-stretched-over-it" look

I don't see that, at least in those pictures(and I picked specifically for that reason).

I do see breasts that are so obviously not real(at least in the bottom two), and see how it can reach, ug and I hate this term, Uncanny Valley, and a distaste to develop.

I don't see stretch marks though. Nothing aesthetically displeasing as such that we see in those pictures, smooth skin no worse and infact better than some naturally large ones, no scars, nothing deeply un-natural(lumps, concave spots, etc). It is very possible for a large natural set to look almost exactly like that(though youth is almost a requirement to maintain pertness, time is very harsh).

That's what I don't get. Vitriolic reaction, described to absurdity. I know it's fark and the internet, I get that it happens, it just doesn't seem to be rational.

What specific features of those pictures that I posted that say "Tupperware-with-skin-stretched-over-it"

The way I see it, it's the thought behind why they're that way, not a neutral judgement of the pictures themselves, that causes distaste, prejudice in a sense. If I were to lie in another time and place, and state that those were 100% real, some people that dislike surgery would have no real problem with those boobs at all(if they were to believe the lie, at any rate).

You and I apparently also have very different views of what qualifies as "vitriolic".

To answer your question, they look fairly good (meaning plausibly real) in the first picture, but in the other two they're completely hemispherical and not really touching each other... real ones that size don't behave that way without the influence of a pretty aggressively-engineered undergarment. Basically, they look like two plastic domes to me, so the Tupperware simile (ripped off without permission from Penn Jillette, btw) seemed apt and obvious to me.

Anyway, it wasn't intended as any sort of slam against you or her (she's got a great smile) and I apologize it I came off that way. I think you made an excellent point about criticizing something we'll never touch, but for me those pictures weren't a great example.

/Not a fan of most after-markets
// hee hee hee "uncanny valley"

tinfoil-hat maggie: NSFW
NSFW
NSFW

Beauties Indeed, Each.

Effervescent, Illuminated, Prolific.

tinfoil-hat maggie: NSFW
NSFW

[24.media.tumblr.com image 400x266]

This is an awesome photo on multiple levels.

tinfoil-hat maggie: [25.media.tumblr.com image 400x600]

2MS: [perfecttitsonchicks.com image 531x800]

Rawr

2MS: Here, Maggie
NSFW
Link

Perfect nursing breasts

ElStreak: I apologize it I came off that way. I think you made an excellent point about criticizing something we'll never touch, but for me those pictures weren't a great example.

No no, you didn't come off as mean or whatever. Harsh criticism isn't mean necessarily. I see your point, though disagree about what breasts will and won't do(sure natural will tend to require more sturdy architecture, but there are plenty of natural one's placed into the perfect dome situation).

Just trying to discuss the finer points of breast shape, likes and dislikes(and reasoning behind them). That is all. Nothing personal intended here either.

ElStreak: // hee hee hee "uncanny valley"

Yeah, it's a buzz term typically for 3d movies and such. It's particularly painful here because of "can" and "valley" but eh.

Keizer_Ghidorah: only difference between pecs and tits is the amount of fat

Keep telling yourself that. Shape, structure, and function, to include societal and instinctual roles, are quite different. If you were correct, tits on kids show's would be just as acceptable as bare chested boys. Even non-fundies would take issue with that happening all of a sudden.

You seem to suffer from some form of obsessive neutrality and equality issue. I'm quite liberal, don't get me wrong. It's not about who's posting, but what's being posted. I love the word fark. I say it all the time. However, I will not use the word in someone else's church though, nor in a courtroom, funeral services, or in a job interview. It's called courtesy. I know it's a rare thing on the internet, but maybe you've heard of it. The people around me in those situations typically will not find it appealing.

I'm pretty sure there's been a tranny photo or three of "breasts" listed in these threads, I don't take issue with that.(I may with that rich dude that got implants to win a bet though, because it's hideous). It's all about shape, form, and presentation. Your male pics are simply not up to standard boob thread fare, so you got sent to the corner in your dunce hat.

Try to make it personal or about bigotry all that you want, but I'm not saying anything that doesn't get said every so often, and would more if people weren't quite so docile. In a thread about boobs, wieners are viewed as out of place by quite a few.

It's a showcase of cats, you don't bring in your doberman and say, Isn't he nice? Then have the audacity to complain when you don't win anything. It's uncouth, a bit odd, and disruptive. You're getting odd looks from many, and vilifying the one guy who's trying to explain it to you. The flavor here is boobs, not buff guys.

Respect the natives, when in Rome, what have you. When SearchN sends out an email about how the thread is serving to all tastes, or when the article infers it, I don't take issue. I don't go into threads about "hot" men and simply spew pics of tits around, as it's going to not be appreciated by at least a few. It's either incredibly naive or rude.

There is a reason that pics like yours don't have near as many threads, it's not bigotry or some sense of civil inequality, it's simply not most people's thing. I'm not vilifying liver and asparagus, only the person who keeps putting it in my face when I'm in the ice cream shop trying to enjoy round scoops of awesome-ness.

omeganuepsilon: I see your point, though disagree about what breasts will and won't do(sure natural will tend to require more sturdy architecture, but there are plenty of natural one's placed into the perfect dome situation).

I've never seen real ones that size approximate a dome (at least, not both at the same time) but I admit that it's very possible I just need to get out more.

Just trying to discuss the finer points of breast shape, likes and dislikes(and reasoning behind them). That is all. Nothing personal intended here either.

I guess for me, when I'm looking at a pair and I think "I bet those things hardly even move" it blows the mood for me. I know at least two women who obviously have implants but still have a pretty natural shape and retain some wobble and sway, and I find theirs appealing.

NSFW blonde

NSFW brunette

NSFW redhead

My first picture contributions,I couldn't think of a better thread...

/BIE
//EIP

/BIE
//EIP
///IvebeengoodIpromise

ElStreak: I guess for me, when I'm looking at a pair and I think "I bet those things hardly even move" it blows the mood for me. I know at least two women who obviously have implants but still have a pretty natural shape and retain some wobble and sway, and I find theirs appealing.

That's akin to what I was saying. To me it's not a "mood", as far as threads like this go. It's a study of the shape, colors, and lighting/shadows. An artistic perspective, not quite erotic, but beautiful. An awesome sunrise, or epic astronomy pics, I see the same way, even if they're fabricated.(well, if they're done with quality, lots of shabby "artists" out there.

I do see what you mean. What you saw in the pics I linked, I see in this one(from someone else just a few posts up, the yellow halter).
Link

That skin, while not showing marks, has the shine of something stretched taught, and they are obviously gravity/force defying, they certainly look a lot more solid than most in the thread.

The one's I posted aren't quite so obvious, or rather, they seem more surreal than "fake", despite their immensity. I hope that makes sense.

What makes the difference is the composition of the photo and any possible aftereffects.

Anyhow, I almost prefer some fake to some natural. A bit of defying gravity is a good thing, while complete surrender can make a photo unappealing. Nothing wrong with age or being natural. I think there is an overly liberal, at times, push to "like" what others do. I won't demean someone to their face about a flaw, but I will never find it appealing. You can't choose to like, say, liver and onions, any more than you can choose to dislike really saggy ones.

Your opinion, however, can change, if you look into why you like/dislike whatever. Be it societal norms, or a naive perspective, or a psychological tie to something unpleasant.(that last is relevant to what I was talking about, an dislike that is not entirely rational)

I used to love all manner of whiskeys, until I got violently sick after drinking once. Now I cannot stomach even the taste of anything even remotely similar, tequilla to spiced rum.

I'll put it a different way. We both have similar tastes in photo's, but our limit markers are in different places, set by different attributes.

If you've the time, GIS for Bryci and tell me what you think of those(NSFW quite obviously, I listed a couple SFW up above). Pretty sure they're fake to an extent but they're spectacular, imo.

I guess my point for calling you into question originally is to see if you dislike any and all fake boobs as a prejudice(and hence an effort to understand the motives), or just happen to see the bad/too obvious jobs and dislike those.

/and to pass some time
//and to get some more practice on the new keyboard
///the split ergo died, so the keys aren't where they should be on the backup

She may need a hand. NSFW

and for Dessert. NSFW