If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Daily Caller)   Obama bravely killed Bin Laden, after bravely setting up a fall guy in case it failed   (thedc.com) divider line 374
    More: Hero, CIA Director Leon Panetta, U.S. Attorney Michael Mukasey, obama, Osama bin Laden, Thomas E. Donilon, Sean Hannity, Fox News, Navy SEAL  
•       •       •

27183 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 May 2012 at 4:13 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



374 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-05-08 11:57:41 AM
Guess because they couldn't get the bullshiat greened yesterday, they're gonna try again today.
 
2012-05-08 11:59:34 AM
Every day????
 
2012-05-08 12:00:41 PM
Holding onto that much anger and frustration is really bad for your health, subby

/just take a deep breath and let it go
//because no one else cares
 
2012-05-08 12:00:53 PM
i145.photobucket.com
 
2012-05-08 12:05:51 PM
more derp from the daily liar.
 
2012-05-08 12:13:59 PM
Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!
 
2012-05-08 12:15:23 PM
if the mission failed, the public would be sure to blame Adm. McRaven....I mean, look at how the public caused Gen. James B. Vaught to be drummed out of the Army after his failure.
 
2012-05-08 12:15:24 PM
EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!


Teabaggers: Pro-Osama because they hate Obama.
 
2012-05-08 12:16:42 PM
EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!


Dude, your guy did not have the balls to pull the trigger at all so STFU.
 
2012-05-08 12:18:31 PM
I'll just repost my comment from that article which I posted earlier today:

You guys can pretend to know what would have happened in this fantasy situation where the raid failed, but he fact of the matter is that it didn't. Obama made the decision "to proceed with the assault." You can spin this any which way you want, but it doesn't change the fact that your nominee is too wimpy to stand by any of his decisions and thus can not be trusted to make these types of strong decisions in the foreign policy arena.
 
2012-05-08 12:25:13 PM
EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!


Wait, I thought he was overruled by his generals and didn't pull the trigger at all.

Or was that last week? I am losing track here, brother. Help me out.
 
2012-05-08 12:28:58 PM
JerseyTim:
You guys can pretend to know what would have happened in this fantasy situation where the raid failed, but he fact of the matter is that it didn't. Obama made the decision "to proceed with the assault." You can spin this any which way you want, but it doesn't change the fact that your nominee is too wimpy to stand by any of his decisions and thus can not be trusted to make these types of strong decisions in the foreign policy arena.


No, no, no: they should keep petulantly whining about Obama killing bin Laden, thereby constantly reminding the American public about their own utter failure in foreign policy.

I mean, its plenty of rope, right, guys? You... you can't possibly hang yourself with that much rope!

Heh! Here... have a little more.
 
2012-05-08 12:29:26 PM
Conservatives? What do you think it says about your ideology when all you have are lies to support it? Do you think you are good and decent people? Say... The kind of person you'd let your kids hang out with?
 
2012-05-08 12:38:04 PM
EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!


Except, no he didn't.

I'm sorry your candidate sucks.

/not really sorry.
 
2012-05-08 12:40:26 PM
WHAT THE FARK AMY I READING? jpg anyone?
 
2012-05-08 12:47:18 PM
WTFDYW: WHAT THE FARK AMY I READING? jpg anyone?

The same bullsh*t they've been trying to get greened since at least Friday.
 
2012-05-08 12:51:06 PM
4.bp.blogspot.com
 
jbc [TotalFark]
2012-05-08 12:53:53 PM
Did EnviroDud, best known around here for giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda, just admit in this thread that Obama was able to "get it right"?
 
2012-05-08 12:55:52 PM
Meanwhile, Subby faps in a dark closet using only his tears and snot as lube...

/hey, just like the dumbass who keeps submitting deadmoran.com links!
 
2012-05-08 12:57:29 PM
jbc: Did EnviroDud, best known around here for giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda, just admit in this thread that Obama was able to "get it right"?

Apparently he takes issue with the SEALs' training methods, though. Maybe he can tell one of them directly that ten months is too long.
 
jbc [TotalFark]
2012-05-08 01:02:41 PM
cameroncrazy1984: jbc: Did EnviroDud, best known around here for giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda, just admit in this thread that Obama was able to "get it right"?

Apparently he takes issue with the SEALs' training methods, though. Maybe he can tell one of them directly that ten months is too long.


I'd watch that on PPV.
 
2012-05-08 01:02:58 PM
Same f*cking link is in the queue again, too
 
2012-05-08 01:03:40 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: Same f*cking link is in the queue again, too

Aw hell no. I'm on my way to downvote.
 
2012-05-08 01:04:12 PM
EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Considering Bush spent 8 years getting it wrong, I think ten months is pretty damn great.
 
2012-05-08 01:04:53 PM
I tried to get the Daily Caller commenters to explain it, but maybe one of our resident Republicans can:

Exactly how does "Bring additional risks to the President for consideration" absolve the President of responsibility and

Exactly why would you want President Obama in direct operational control of the mission rather than a military commander?
 
2012-05-08 01:07:21 PM
The My Little Pony Killer: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Same f*cking link is in the queue again, too

Aw hell no. I'm on my way to downvote.


That was me. I figure if they are going to keep on submitting it, we should have a headline that has a loose connection to reality out there somewhere.
 
2012-05-08 01:09:09 PM
WhoIsWillo: The My Little Pony Killer: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Same f*cking link is in the queue again, too

Aw hell no. I'm on my way to downvote.

That was me. I figure if they are going to keep on submitting it, we should have a headline that has a loose connection to reality out there somewhere.


And it's not even loosely connected to reality. So, you know, great farking job, that...
 
2012-05-08 01:10:27 PM
Vodka Zombie: And it's not even loosely connected to reality. So, you know, great farking job, that...

It at the very least makes it clear that the guy saying this crap doesn't have any grip on reality.
 
2012-05-08 01:14:06 PM
cameroncrazy1984: The same bullsh*t they've been trying to get greened since at least Friday.

I think they're just trying to start their own "Lisa 'Left Eye' Lopez is dead" running joke.
 
2012-05-08 01:14:50 PM
Man, it really hurts the Republicans deep down in their soul to know that Osama was killed under a Dems watch. I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11. I guess they forgot.
 
2012-05-08 01:17:16 PM
GWLush: Man, it really hurts the Republicans deep down in their soul to know that Osama was killed under a Dems watch. I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11. I guess they forgot.

I think they're pissed because someone sank their bogeyman

/and they can't use his still being alive as a "failed Obama promise"
 
2012-05-08 01:20:03 PM
www.delawareonline.com

Chicken's just askin' for it, subby.
 
2012-05-08 01:21:12 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: GWLush: Man, it really hurts the Republicans deep down in their soul to know that Osama was killed under a Dems watch. I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11. I guess they forgot.

I think they're pissed because someone sank their bogeyman

/and they can't use his still being alive as a "failed Obama promise"


Or that Obama is soft on defense and military action. That dog just won't hunt.
 
2012-05-08 01:22:16 PM
WhoIsWillo: The My Little Pony Killer: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Same f*cking link is in the queue again, too

Aw hell no. I'm on my way to downvote.

That was me. I figure if they are going to keep on submitting it, we should have a headline that has a loose connection to reality out there somewhere.


I think we need to go ahead and have you re-calibrated.
 
2012-05-08 01:23:00 PM
I think I found a loophole in the Daily Caller commenting system: they can delete original comments but they can't delete replies to comments!

I'm having fun over there.
 
2012-05-08 01:30:34 PM
You would, and I do not use this word lightly, LITERALLY have to be retarded to get this headline from that memo.
 
2012-05-08 01:32:37 PM
Jackson Herring: You would, and I do not use this word lightly, LITERALLY have to be retarded to get this headline from that memo.

Read the comments section on the article, you'll understand you're right.
 
2012-05-08 01:34:02 PM
Assuming this is true... Wouldn't it be Reaganesque for Obama to allow a military officer to fall on the sword for his leader. And a full admiral too... that's even better than a Colonel. Sure the raid to kill Bin Laden wasn't thwarting the explicit will of Congress. But we can't truly expect Obama to completely out-Reagan the gipper.
 
2012-05-08 01:37:54 PM
Dear Conservatives,

We forgot that Osama Bin Laden was executed without a single loss of an innocent life under President Obama.

Thanks for the reminder.

Love,

The American Public.
 
2012-05-08 01:38:01 PM
kbronsito: Assuming this is true...

And it's not...
 
2012-05-08 01:49:45 PM
EnviroDude is a drive-by threadshiatter. There is little point in responding to him and expecting an answer for his idiocy. I should know that by now.
 
2012-05-08 02:01:14 PM
I guess in this case, downvoting this thread seems to have gotten it greened. It's nice to know that the paying customers are really being listened to by the Fark powers that be, huh?
 
2012-05-08 02:02:08 PM
AdolfOliverPanties: EnviroDude is a drive-by threadshiatter. There is little point in responding to him and expecting an answer for his idiocy. I should know that by now.

I don't know. I've seen him stick around for a few wars of words. He's not as bad as Bill C. That dude's a giant pussy.
 
2012-05-08 02:02:15 PM
This is the chicken farking we're going with?
 
2012-05-08 02:02:25 PM
This is possibly one of the strangest things that you'll ever witness since William Shatner (Captain Kirk from the Star Trek) performing Elton John's "Rocket Man".
 
2012-05-08 02:03:20 PM
propasaurus: This is the chicken farking we're going with?

Well, the remaining blood, feathers, and lube, anyway
 
2012-05-08 02:04:58 PM
Cyberluddite: I guess in this case, downvoting this thread seems to have gotten it greened.

Personally, I support the GOP plan to constantly remind voters that Obama killed Bin Laden.
 
2012-05-08 02:14:00 PM
what_now: Cyberluddite: I guess in this case, downvoting this thread seems to have gotten it greened.

Personally, I support the GOP plan to constantly remind voters that Obama killed Bin Laden.


I don't understand how the GOP thinks they can make this Obama's "toxic success". They fact that even the people that hate Obama have to preface their derp ("I think it's great that we killed bin Laden, but..") should clue them in.
 
2012-05-08 02:19:20 PM
"The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President."

I don't see how you can really interpret that as "setting up a fall guy." The President, though he is the Commander in Chief, is not trained in setting up military raids and would naturally delegate the operational details to a militaryman. This is how every non-military President has done it since time immemorial. It's not as if Lincoln personally plotted out the logistics of Sherman's March across Georgia.
 
2012-05-08 02:21:30 PM
RexTalionis: I don't see how you can really interpret that as "setting up a fall guy." The President, though he is the Commander in Chief, is not trained in setting up military raids and would naturally delegate the operational details to a militaryman. This is how every non-military President has done it since time immemorial. It's not as if Lincoln personally plotted out the logistics of Sherman's March across Georgia.

You know, I asked this over in the comments in TFA but I haven't got a response yet. It's almost as if they're willing to believe anything they're told without thinking critically about what it means.
 
2012-05-08 02:23:49 PM
cameroncrazy1984: I'm guessing this is a "shut up, guys" greenlight.

Which, ironically, will probably only make them keep submitting bullsh*t because hey, at least one will get greenlighted.


Which is why it should've been this other one--which, incidently, was actually upvoted--that got greened instead.
 
2012-05-08 02:27:52 PM
I give Obama the exact amount of credit for the OBL raid as I give President Bush for invading Iraq.
 
2012-05-08 02:30:09 PM
FTA: Former U.S. Attorney Michael Mukasey told Fox News Channel host Sean Hannity on Friday night that the Navy SEAL mission to kill Osama bin Laden was preceded by "a highly lawyered memo" from CIA Director Leon Panetta - one designed to insulate President Barack Obama if the operation failed.

Michael Mukasey, U.S. Attorney General under Bush II, makes a outrageous claim on Sean Hannity's show on Fox News? What a farking, outright LIE!!!

I read the memo in the article (also quoted by Jackson Herring above - thank you very much). It's the memo to proceed with the operation after President Obama reviewed its risk assessment, giving clear directions to go in, get bin Laden, and if not there, get out. If any other risks arise, bring them to the President for his review.

/Farkin' yellow journalism at its worst, i.e. use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudoscience, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts.
 
2012-05-08 02:31:39 PM
As a conservative, I am ashamed that this got greened.

/Who knew that all Carter needed was a memo?
 
2012-05-08 02:31:41 PM
Sgt Otter: I give Obama the exact amount of credit for the OBL raid as I give President Bush for invading Iraq.

Oooo, well said, Sgt Otter.
 
2012-05-08 02:36:56 PM
Sgt Otter: I give Obama the exact amount of credit for the OBL raid as I give President Bush for invading Iraq.

But that worked out so well?
 
2012-05-08 02:40:02 PM
what_now: Sgt Otter: I give Obama the exact amount of credit for the OBL raid as I give President Bush for invading Iraq.

But that worked out so well?


I took Sgt Otter's comment is that Bush is fully responsible for the Iraq War fiasco as is President Obama for the OBL raid in Pakistan.

/How's it been, what_now?
 
2012-05-08 02:40:57 PM
AirForceVet: I took Sgt Otter's comment is that Bush is fully responsible for the Iraq War fiasco as is President Obama for the OBL raid in Pakistan.

/How's it been, what_now?


Pretty good! Haven't been around as much. Busy w/ work. Yeah, I got what Sgt. Otter was saying. I was being sarcastic.
 
2012-05-08 02:45:52 PM
This is what we have to look forward to isn't it? Republicans trying to downplay Obama accomplishments. Even the one where he had Osama Bin Laden killed. Osama Bin Laden, the guy who planned and carried out the attacks on 9/11. Republicans are no longer allowed to call themselves Patriots. It is abundantly clear that they have put party way before country.
 
2012-05-08 02:49:14 PM
If Bush hadn't given up on Bin Laden and he'd actually have been shot on his watch then he would appear on the news wearing two New York Fire Department helmets at the same time in front of a banner of an eagle that shiats bacon onto terrorists while drinking champagne from Bin Laden's hollowed out skull.
 
2012-05-08 02:52:27 PM
Fark is the mongoose to the MSM's cobra, you guys.
 
2012-05-08 03:04:15 PM
Speeches written in case the Normandy landings or the moon mission failed
 
2012-05-08 03:04:56 PM
oops, here

Link
 
2012-05-08 03:19:44 PM
That's not what the memo says.
 
2012-05-08 03:29:22 PM
Michael Mukasey wasn't in office when the memo went out.
 
2012-05-08 03:38:24 PM
t1.gstatic.com
 
2012-05-08 03:54:33 PM
To paraphrase Newt Gingrich: These are dispatches from Cloudcuckooland. If the bin Laden raid had gone wrong, how would the White House have avoided blame? It would have waved around a memo which mentioned that "additional risks are to be brought back to the President"? Seriously? In the Hannity interview, Mukasey compares this memo to Dwight Eisenhower's pre-D-Day "message to be given in the event the invasion failed." That's the sort of comparison that reveals how weak an argument this is. But this must be why the Obama campaign celebrates Christmas every day that the media discusses OBL -- it drives Bush loyalists absolutely insane when they realize Obama gets the credit. Link
 
2012-05-08 04:03:06 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: Holding onto that much anger and frustration is really bad for your health, subby

/just take a deep breath and let it go
//because no one else cares


The GOP mantra "If we believe it, it's true.". And if they don't "farking liberal media".

/Just another Independent who wishes the GOP weren't so full of shiat.
 
2012-05-08 04:12:15 PM
Obama sux
 
2012-05-08 04:16:51 PM
Fox News has gotten so predictable that they've become one of Obama's greatest propaganda arms through their incompetence. Thanks again Hannity.....you're not helping.
 
2012-05-08 04:18:30 PM
Whatever. Nixon had the same thing prepped in case the moon landing went tits up.
 
2012-05-08 04:19:32 PM
This obviously proves that Usama bin Laden isn't really dead, and therefore Usama bin Laden is automatically the president and Obama is demoted to chimney sweep.
 
2012-05-08 04:19:55 PM
Killing Osama sure put a lot of people back to work in a completely recovered economy.

Keep crowing, libs.
 
2012-05-08 04:20:03 PM
Was it Lee Majors? The Unknown Stuntman?
 
2012-05-08 04:20:04 PM
Obama was the one who pulled the trigger now?? Is there no end to the demo's turning him into a hero?
 
2012-05-08 04:20:54 PM
What, it would have been better had there been no backup plan at all?

Gotta love how people twist stuff.
 
2012-05-08 04:21:01 PM
I see that those who harbor the conservative disease are milking The Big Lie for all it is worth.
 
2012-05-08 04:21:22 PM
Headline is blatantly a lie. A Republican troll. Did you read the memo?

Obviously not.
 
2012-05-08 04:21:25 PM
So when is Former U.S. Attorney Michael Mukasey going to be arrested for revealing Top Secret information?
 
2012-05-08 04:21:27 PM
Big Man On Campus: Obama was the one who pulled the trigger now??

Osama was the one flying the plane?

The right has nothing.
 
2012-05-08 04:22:20 PM
AverageAmericanGuy: Killing Osama sure put a lot of people back to work in a completely recovered economy.

Keep crowing, libs.


Your post reeks of threadshiat and fail.
 
2012-05-08 04:23:07 PM
Why did they copy the memo with the article when it just shows that they are grasping at straws? I was thinking about going along for the ride until I read what was actually written.
 
2012-05-08 04:23:42 PM

Tigger

If Bush hadn't given up on Bin Laden and he'd actually have been shot on his watch then he would appear on the news wearing two New York Fire Department helmets at the same time in front of a banner of an eagle that shiats bacon onto terrorists while drinking champagne from Bin Laden's hollowed out skull.

yep, this.

And you would have said something like "This is how we deal with terrorists in Texas..well maybe in other states too, and then we taxidermy the skulls and hang 'em. He will look mighty fine in the den. Sorry I had to kill you old buddy. I mean USA USA"


/I even derped it a bit. that sh*t is contagious.
 
2012-05-08 04:24:33 PM
you = he.

what. the. f*ck.
 
2012-05-08 04:25:10 PM
Why do Republicans love Osama Bin Laden?

Still?

By the way, they tell us Obama is completely responsible for the operation by "setting up a fall guy if it failed." If they want this victory to go away, they really need to stop saying Obama was in charge while trying to say he had nothing to do with it.
 
2012-05-08 04:25:41 PM
"One definition of a great leader," Mukasey added later in the interview, "is somebody who takes less credit than he should and takes more blame than he should. And that's not what we've got now."

Does this accurately describe ANY POTUS since roughly around Kennedy's time?
 
2012-05-08 04:25:41 PM
The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration.

Pretty responsible of Obama.

I'd sure as hell call back the mission if I found out the SEAL Team waded into a house full of kids who would have been in a cross-fire...
 
2012-05-08 04:25:43 PM
gilgigamesh: EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!

Wait, I thought he was overruled by his generals and didn't pull the trigger at all.

Or was that last week? I am losing track here, brother. Help me out.


* First Obama was mean and killed OBL when OBL should of been captured and given a trial even if it meant putting the lives of SEALs in danger.
* Then Bush actually had it all done and Obama just followed Bush's instructions he had laid out years later.
* Then Obama did nothing and his military decided it all and Obama was just a no back bone spectator to afraid of stopping things.
* Recently it has turned into "Well EVERYONE would of made that decision" even though Mitt Romney is on record for saying he was against making that exact decision.

I think these cover most of the GOP's butthurt about Obama actually getting OBL.
 
2012-05-08 04:25:57 PM
Guys... if you fall for this stupid "take your enemies greatest strength"(Obama's decision to let the Navy do its thing) "and make it a weakness ploy". You are a farking stupid piece of shiat who lets asshole republicans get elected to office because they had a campaign to muddy up the water just enough to get you not to vote. Its just a dumb farking tactic that republicans perfected in the late 80's, which Karl Rove absolutely loved so much that he taught it to all his goons. I cant believe people fall for this shiat.
 
2012-05-08 04:26:05 PM
AverageAmericanGuy: Killing Osama sure put a lot of people back to work in a completely recovered economy.

Keep crowing, libs.


Hmmmm....I don't like where you moved that goalpost. Why don't you try over there? No, that's not right either.
 
2012-05-08 04:26:12 PM
EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!



Tell the truth, are you just a bit of code like an Obama-Hate-Bot?

I mean, you are never more than a few posts in and spewing the same old jibber jabber. Is this really fun for you?
 
2012-05-08 04:26:26 PM
Dusk-You-n-Me: Big Man On Campus: Obama was the one who pulled the trigger now??

Osama was the one flying the plane?

The right has nothing.


And Hitler killed all the Jews, right?

Yep ... the right has absolutely NOTHING in this fight ... it's truly hilarious watching someone suffocate under their own shiat.
 
2012-05-08 04:26:41 PM
Here's the memo:

"Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am."

dailycaller.com

First, how is this setting up McRaven as the fall guy? Seems like more a straight go ahead, with an (obvious) note that if anything changes before it happens, tell the big guy. Also, that's a "a highly lawyered memo'? Really? It's farking handwritten, for fark's sake. Looks like more of a note of a phone call than a "memo", anyways.
 
SH
2012-05-08 04:26:44 PM
Anyone have any idea what percentage of morons in the USA watch FOX News and buy all their BS? I live sorta close to Cincinnati/Indiana/Dayton and all the hillbilly fools around here watch it 24/7 and take it as gospel.

Please tell me the rest of the country isn't this stupid.
 
2012-05-08 04:26:46 PM
Nadie_AZ: Cyberluddite: cameroncrazy1984: The admin policy here is ridiculous.

I believe the admin policy is now "greenlight any trolling shiat that the people who actually pay to use this website think really sucks and massively downvote." If other businesses used the same business model, Microsoft would be pitching Vista as its top-end OS, and you would be seeing lots of ads for New Coke.

To be fair, they only do this every other year. You know, election year. In come the paid trolls and off they go.


The policy is "greenlight stuff that generates lots of discussion".
Trolling headlines do this.
The big secret is that you guys take the greenlights here way more seriously than Drew and his admins do.
 
2012-05-08 04:27:03 PM
SilentStrider: AverageAmericanGuy: Killing Osama sure put a lot of people back to work in a completely recovered economy.

Keep crowing, libs.

Your post reeks of threadshiat and fail.


Reality sometimes reminds libs of that. It's why they are pollyanna libs and not hard truth facing conservative.
 
2012-05-08 04:27:10 PM
jbc: Did EnviroDud, best known around here for giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda, just admit in this thread that Obama was able to "get it right"?

Weird right? Must be off his meds.
 
2012-05-08 04:27:24 PM
Diogenes: AverageAmericanGuy: Killing Osama sure put a lot of people back to work in a completely recovered economy.

Keep crowing, libs.

Hmmmm....I don't like where you moved that goalpost. Why don't you try over there? No, that's not right either.


He's not big on feng shui.
 
2012-05-08 04:27:29 PM
This is classic attack someone's strength politicking, the right wing will be attacking Obama on the Bin Laden killing for the next few months. Notice the attorney shill use verbiage similar to the Obama grandstanding rhetoric from that started the other week.
 
2012-05-08 04:27:44 PM
Maybe he should be more like Romney, who would consult his lawyers before taking any action. He did say that would be his Weeners to an Iranian threat.
 
2012-05-08 04:27:51 PM
I'm getting pretty sick of these petty assholes trying to make the bin Laden raid anything other than what it was, a complete success. All while blaming Obama for something that never happened.
 
2012-05-08 04:28:31 PM
Big Man On Campus: Obama was the one who pulled the trigger now?? Is there no end to the demo's turning him into a hero?

You think the military would do an operation like this in a sovereign country without getting the go ahead from the president first?

I await your moving goal posts, changing subject and/or lack of response.
 
2012-05-08 04:29:07 PM
This just shows that Obama ain't no dummy.
Nothing to see here, move along .
 
2012-05-08 04:29:24 PM
EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!


You think Romney is better?!?!?!?

In 2007, Romney criticized (candidate) Barack Obama for stating that, as President, he would launch military strikes against "high-value terrorist targets" in Pakistan, even without the Pakistani government's approval. In 2011, after such a strike resulted in the death of Osama bin Laden, Romney said that, if he had been President, he would have done "exactly the same thing."
 
2012-05-08 04:29:33 PM
Am I the only one that watched the video? Unless I misheard, the memo stated that if you did anything other than the plan, you need to check with us first or take the blame. I don't see this as any different than the quarterback changing the game plan that was discussed with the coach and failing because of it.
 
2012-05-08 04:30:13 PM
violentsalvation: I'm getting pretty sick of these petty assholes trying to make the bin Laden raid anything other than what it was, a complete success. All while blaming Obama for something that never happened.

I think it pisses of independents too, which is great. I hope they keep it up. They refuse to give Obama any praise for anything he does and have to pretend whatever he does was the worst thing ever.
 
2012-05-08 04:31:38 PM
Did Carter have a memo? It would make him retroactively president from 1981-1985.
 
2012-05-08 04:31:40 PM
cameroncrazy1984: Jackson Herring: You would, and I do not use this word lightly, LITERALLY have to be retarded to get this headline from that memo.

Read the comments section on the article, you'll understand you're right.


Those are some of the very finest derp I have ever read. The ferocity with which they hate Obama is as terrifying as it is hilarious.

Most of us hated Bush when he was president, but the Tea Baggers just take it to a whole new level.
 
2012-05-08 04:31:47 PM
YouPeopleAreCrazy: Whatever. Nixon had the same thing prepped in case the moon landing went tits up.

Just because all previous presidents were experts in CYA doesn't mean Obama is the same as other politicians.
After spending months using his decider skills to plan this op, he never needed to plan for it going tits up. Because it wouldn't.
 
2012-05-08 04:32:04 PM
lordmoon: Am I the only one that watched the video? Unless I misheard, the memo stated that if you did anything other than the plan, you need to check with us first or take the blame. I don't see this as any different than the quarterback changing the game plan that was discussed with the coach and failing because of it.

It doesn't say "or you take the blame". It says "if anything changes, tell the President, period". Of course, this is obvious.
 
2012-05-08 04:32:05 PM
That was awfully white of him.
 
2012-05-08 04:32:36 PM
Dusk-You-n-Me: Osama was the one flying the plane?

The right has nothing.


It wasn't Osama...
i0.kym-cdn.com

/legal aliens mind you.
 
2012-05-08 04:32:42 PM
GWLush: It is abundantly clear that they have put party way before country.

Republicanism is a religion.
 
2012-05-08 04:34:23 PM
"Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am."

Let me translate for the idiots out there:
"Tom Donilon called. The President said do the raid. Admiral McRaven is in charge of the raid. The President said OK based on what he was told. If anything changes, let him know. The plain is to get bin Laden. If he's not there, we're leaving. We told Admiral McRaven at 10:45 am."
 
2012-05-08 04:37:27 PM
AverageAmericanGuy: blah blah blah Killing Osama yap yap yap completely recovered economy derp derp

I laugh every time I see you in here, because I know how much it's going to kill you when Obama gets another four years where he doesn't have to worry about re-election. You think you're angry now? L O f#cking L.
 
2012-05-08 04:38:01 PM
The right is trying to do all they can to paint Obama as weak of defense, which means not allowing him any credit for any military matters over the last 3 years.

Everything has to be due to someone else, and never the president. It seems to be failing with all but the most fanatical righties though.
 
2012-05-08 04:38:54 PM
Howard Dean: That was awfully white of him.

i.imgur.com

WHAT IS LOVE
BABY DON'T HURT ME
DONT HURT ME
I'M WHITE

 
2012-05-08 04:39:16 PM
JerseyTim: "Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am."

Let me translate for the idiots out there:
"Tom Donilon called. The President said do the raid. Admiral McRaven is in charge of the raid. The President said OK based on what he was told. If anything changes, let him know. The plain is to get bin Laden. If he's not there, we're leaving. We told Admiral McRaven at 10:45 am."


"Also told McRaven it's his turn to bring the donuts."
 
2012-05-08 04:39:36 PM
I hear he leaves the seat up.
 
SH
2012-05-08 04:42:18 PM
Geotpf: Here's the memo:

"Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am."

First, how is this setting up McRaven as the fall guy? Seems like more a straight go ahead, with an (obvious) note that if anything changes before it happens, tell the big guy. Also, that's a "a highly lawyered memo'? Really? It's farking handwritten, for fark's sake. Looks like more of a note of a phone call than a "memo", anyways.


Agree 100%. No laying blame or anything of the sort there. Republitards strike again.
 
2012-05-08 04:43:09 PM
Barricaded Gunman: AverageAmericanGuy: blah blah blah Killing Osama yap yap yap completely recovered economy derp derp

I laugh every time I see you in here, because I know how much it's going to kill you when Obama gets another four years where he doesn't have to worry about re-election. You think you're angry now? L O f#cking L.


Won't be too bad. I voted for him the first time around.

It's as much my fault as anyone else's that he's President today.
 
2012-05-08 04:44:02 PM
SH: Anyone have any idea what percentage of morons in the USA watch FOX News and buy all their BS? I live sorta close to Cincinnati/Indiana/Dayton and all the hillbilly fools around here watch it 24/7 and take it as gospel.

Please tell me the rest of the country isn't this stupid.


There are a lot of Republican true believers out there, all over the country, and, yes, they all watch Fox News. But beyond the true believers, I don't think Fox News et al matters. I really think that very few swing voters ever vote Republican these days-I think such people usually swing between not voting (or voting third party, which amounts to the same thing) and the Democrats. So, for example, in 2010, turnout sucked, so the Republicans won, as those "swing voters" decided to not bother to vote.

Turnout in 2012 is guaranteed to be better than in 2010 (which was only a midterm, of course). Will it be as good as 2016? Probably not, although it might be close. Will it be enough to re-elect Obama? Of course. Will be enough for the Democrats to hold on to the Senate and retake the House? Dunno-that's the question.
 
2012-05-08 04:44:16 PM
I'd like to thank most of you for restoring my faith that there are people out there not wearing themselves as a hat.
 
2012-05-08 04:44:27 PM
EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!


Clearly, he should have just barge in without planning anything, or weighing the consequences, or thinking of a way out if things went to shiat...


Y'know, the Republican way.
 
2012-05-08 04:44:42 PM
No surprise.

he is Hype and Blame and needed to blame someone if this didn't work. and if it did, he breaks out his favorite word "I" and uses it as much as he can.
 
2012-05-08 04:45:54 PM
obamorons, your dear leader is a narcissist. All his life obama has been told he's special, perfect and whatever bad that happens is someone else's fault. He's very good at covering up to make himself look good. Get ready for the mother of all temper tantrums in Nov when America does the right thing and elects Romney. Time for the adults to fix our great Country.
 
2012-05-08 04:45:57 PM
Asked by Hannity if the memo "was designed to protect the president politically," Mukasey suggested that "there's going to be more that comes tumbling out about that escapade. But so far, that memo is enough."

Why is this supposed to upset me?
 
2012-05-08 04:46:11 PM
"And it was to proceed according to the risks, only according to the risks that had been outlined to the president. And if he encountered anything else, he had to check back..."


So he had to check back if they encountered anything that hadn't been briefed - they didn't just give him free reign to shoot from the hip?

ThisIsAnOutrage.jpg/
 
2012-05-08 04:46:15 PM
I, for one, blame Bush.
 
2012-05-08 04:47:23 PM
Geotpf: Here's the memo:

"Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am."

[dailycaller.com image 640x713]

First, how is this setting up McRaven as the fall guy? Seems like more a straight go ahead, with an (obvious) note that if anything changes before it happens, tell the big guy. Also, that's a "a highly lawyered memo'? Really? It's farking handwritten, for fark's sake. Looks like more of a note of a phone call than a "memo", anyways.


It only seems that way because you can read.
 
2012-05-08 04:48:37 PM
-1 for poor penmanship

/ article is bullshiat
 
2012-05-08 04:48:40 PM
Launch Code: Get ready for the mother of all temper tantrums in Nov when America does the right thing and elects Romney.

Let's not be completely ridiculous.

Obama may be a terrible president and person, but he's not going to lose to Romney in November.
 
2012-05-08 04:48:42 PM
Geotpf: SH: Anyone have any idea what percentage of morons in the USA watch FOX News and buy all their BS? I live sorta close to Cincinnati/Indiana/Dayton and all the hillbilly fools around here watch it 24/7 and take it as gospel.

Please tell me the rest of the country isn't this stupid.

There are a lot of Republican true believers out there, all over the country, and, yes, they all watch Fox News. But beyond the true believers, I don't think Fox News et al matters. I really think that very few swing voters ever vote Republican these days-I think such people usually swing between not voting (or voting third party, which amounts to the same thing) and the Democrats. So, for example, in 2010, turnout sucked, so the Republicans won, as those "swing voters" decided to not bother to vote.

Turnout in 2012 is guaranteed to be better than in 2010 (which was only a midterm, of course). Will it be as good as 2016? Probably not, although it might be close. Will it be enough to re-elect Obama? Of course. Will be enough for the Democrats to hold on to the Senate and retake the House? Dunno-that's the question.


I agree that Fox News is probably not paid much attention by swing voters, but I still think it is very destructive. The Fox News faithful that watch it religiously believe every single narrative they air. It makes it impossible to have any sort of rational political discussion with the hardline conservatives I know. I don't mind someone not agreeing with me politically, so long as they work their opinion off of actual facts.

The e-mail forwards from extended family have been particularly numerous this year. Thank goodness for Snopes.
 
2012-05-08 04:48:44 PM
Launch Code: obamorons, your dear leader is a narcissist. All his life obama has been told he's special, perfect and whatever bad that happens is someone else's fault. He's very good at covering up to make himself look good. Get ready for the mother of all temper tantrums in Nov when America does the right thing and elects Romney. Time for the adults to fix our great Country.

You almost make some sense and the bold bit is probably true but isn't it true of any politician at that level?

/not biting on the rest of the obvious trolling in this post
 
2012-05-08 04:49:07 PM
Nina_Hartley's_Ass: I hear he leaves the seat up.

Even worse, that commie loads the toilet paper rolls underhanded.
 
2012-05-08 04:49:17 PM
SpectroBoy: EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!

You think
?

no, no he doesn't
 
2012-05-08 04:49:18 PM
Yah, seems like "cover your ass" would be normal operating procedure for politicians. None story.
 
2012-05-08 04:49:26 PM
Launch Code: obamorons, your dear leader is a narcissist. All his life obama has been told he's special, perfect and whatever bad that happens is someone else's fault. He's very good at covering up to make himself look good. Get ready for the mother of all temper tantrums in Nov when America does the right thing and elects Romney. Time for the adults to fix our great Country.

Can't tell if trolling...
 
2012-05-08 04:50:06 PM
 
2012-05-08 04:51:38 PM
SilentStrider: He's not big on feng shui.

Feng shui: "Don't shiat where you eat."

Basically.
 
2012-05-08 04:51:46 PM
SH: Anyone have any idea what percentage of morons in the USA watch FOX News and buy all their BS? I live sorta close to Cincinnati/Indiana/Dayton and all the hillbilly fools around here watch it 24/7 and take it as gospel.

Please tell me the rest of the country isn't this stupid.


In Massachusetts, one of the liberal capitals of the US, there is a Republican groundfire burning - the same one that got Scott Brown elected to take Ted Kennedy's seat. Quite a few of my friends watch Fox News and get all fired up when O'Reilly or Hannity or Beck go on a tirade. It makes sense due to the local government chaos and corruption, but if you want to be surprised at how stupid some people can be in Massachusetts, read the comments after a Howie Carr article at BostonHerald.com
 
2012-05-08 04:52:13 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: Holding onto that much anger and frustration is really bad for your health, subby

/just take a deep breath and let it go
//because no one else cares


Yeah, he's only the President, in an election year. Let it go.
 
2012-05-08 04:53:11 PM
JerseyTim: Let me translate for the idiots out there:

i.imgur.com
 
2012-05-08 04:53:13 PM
When is a stupid thread about what ifs in an authorization memo for a successful op news?


Nevermore.

It's been a very Poe kind of day.
 
2012-05-08 04:53:37 PM
He got lots of bites today, so I decided to do this:

i628.photobucket.com
 
2012-05-08 04:53:45 PM
FTFA: "One definition of a great leader," Mukasey added later in the interview, "is somebody who takes less credit than he should and takes more blame than he should. And that's not what we've got now."

Explain to me how e-farking-zactly you do that in this political atmosphere.
 
2012-05-08 04:54:08 PM
Surool: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: I hear he leaves the seat up.

Even worse, that commie loads the toilet paper rolls underhanded.


The War on Women continues...
 
2012-05-08 04:54:18 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: Hype and Blame

Tripe.
Lame.

Funny you're taking you're talking points from an actual bumper sticker.
But not surprising.
 
2012-05-08 04:55:22 PM
There are alot of things to be pissed off at Obama about. This, or anything related to the OBL killing certainly arent one of them. Why is it so hard for the GOP to admit this? Can't someone be a staunch republican and still say "Hey, you know what, I don't like him, but he got this right."?
 
2012-05-08 04:56:38 PM
FTA:"And you better believe that if anything else had been encountered and the mission had failed, then the blame would have fallen on McCraven. That's what that's about."

Well I'm convinced. If I wasn't before, the idle speculation of a man on the outside of it using his gift of prescience to see the future has convinced me.
 
2012-05-08 04:57:12 PM
i106.photobucket.com
 
2012-05-08 04:57:59 PM
It's been pretty fascinating to watch this entirely invented "controversy" take hold in the right-wing media.
 
2012-05-08 04:58:44 PM
Julie Cochrane: When is a stupid thread about what ifs in an authorization memo for a successful op news?

upload.wikimedia.org

Depends on who's getting the success. Hannity could tell you all about that.
 
2012-05-08 04:59:28 PM
bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

Words cannot express how much awesome this shop has.
 
2012-05-08 04:59:38 PM
tenpoundsofcheese:
No surprise.

he is Hype and Blame and needed to blame someone if this didn't work. and if it did, he breaks out his favorite word "I" and uses it as much as he can.


No surprise you can't read.
 
2012-05-08 04:59:42 PM
NeoCortex42: I agree that Fox News is probably not paid much attention by swing voters, but I still think it is very destructive. The Fox News faithful that watch it religiously believe every single narrative they air. It makes it impossible to have any sort of rational political discussion with the hardline conservatives I know. I don't mind someone not agreeing with me politically, so long as they work their opinion off of actual facts.

The e-mail forwards from extended family have been particularly numerous this year. Thank goodness for Snopes.


That's sort of my point. If everything somebody says is completely retarded, you tune them out completely, like you are doing from your family, so they have no influence with the mushy middle.

I keep praising Karl Rove lately (ewwww), because he knows this shiat is not how you win elections. You say five rational things and then stretch the truth on the sixth; you don't say six stupid things and expect anybody to listen to you. This is also not how he would play the "attack your opponent on his strength" game-you do it by attacking him on something tangentially related to his strength, not remind everybody of the actual strong thing. For example, a Rovian tactic here would attack Obama for not being tought enough on Iran, or attack him for proposing cuts to the military-not remind everybody that he ordered Bin Laden killed.

If Fox News was merely biased, but mostly sane, they would have more influence amoungst swing voters than being herpyderpydoo all the time. Right now, everybody knows they are the GOP's propganda arm and so everybody ignores them.
 
2012-05-08 04:59:58 PM
Poor, poor GOP.

They got nuthin.

If anything unexpected happens check back with me = Don't blame me if it goes bad.... somehow. Not even a half-assed try fox.
 
2012-05-08 05:00:46 PM
Sir Robin, is that you?
 
2012-05-08 05:01:14 PM
"Hooray!!!"
www.carmelitekids.com
"Obama killed Bin-Laden!!!"

"That's right..."
www.billslater.com
"...and I did it for you kids!!!"

"but, but, but..."
www.yourfunnystuff.com
mjcdn.motherjones.comezkool.com
reason.comassets0.ordienetworks.com
 
2012-05-08 05:01:47 PM
Somacandra: bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

Words cannot express how much awesome this shop has.


Who's that between Spawn and Catwoman?
 
2012-05-08 05:01:55 PM
what_now: Dear Conservatives,

We forgot that Osama Bin Laden was executed without a single loss of an innocent life under President Obama.

Thanks for the reminder.

Love,

The American Public.


Or a trial or with a care about national sovereignty

but it does send the message we will spend trillions to hunt you down for justice
 
2012-05-08 05:04:01 PM
You always line up your alibi's before a hit.
Thats the Chicago way!

/Bush gets credit if its good.
//Obama gets blame if its bad.
///Thats the Repub's way.
 
2012-05-08 05:05:15 PM
I, for one, would like to heartily encourage Republicans to keep reminding America that Osama Bin Laden was killed under Commander-In-Chief Obama's watch.
 
2012-05-08 05:05:24 PM
GWLush: Man, it really hurts the Republicans deep down in their soul to know that Osama was killed under a Dems watch. I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11. I guess they forgot.

Dems had two cracks at him, so yea, you're only batting .500

Still glad he's fish food.
 
2012-05-08 05:06:25 PM
what's the record for lowest link vote?

... -34 and sinking fast
 
2012-05-08 05:07:15 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?
 
2012-05-08 05:07:29 PM
Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Who's that between Spawn and Catwoman?

Dunno. I've only seen this a couple of times, but its slays me every time.
 
2012-05-08 05:08:53 PM
Nana's Vibrator: SH: Anyone have any idea what percentage of morons in the USA watch FOX News and buy all their BS? I live sorta close to Cincinnati/Indiana/Dayton and all the hillbilly fools around here watch it 24/7 and take it as gospel.

Please tell me the rest of the country isn't this stupid.

In Massachusetts, one of the liberal capitals of the US, there is a Republican groundfire burning - the same one that got Scott Brown elected to take Ted Kennedy's seat. Quite a few of my friends watch Fox News and get all fired up when O'Reilly or Hannity or Beck go on a tirade. It makes sense due to the local government chaos and corruption, but if you want to be surprised at how stupid some people can be in Massachusetts, read the comments after a Howie Carr article at BostonHerald.com


Scott Brown is an actual moderate, or at least as close to one as a Republican can get these days. Plus, Coakley was a horrible candidate.

Now, he might win re-election because incumbency is a powerful thing. Looks like that stupid Indian crap is causing problems for Warren; dumb scandals like that are sometimes enough to tip the scales, especially with an incumbent.
 
2012-05-08 05:08:54 PM
Somacandra: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Who's that between Spawn and Catwoman?

Dunno. I've only seen this a couple of times, but its slays me every time.


Is it Eric Draven/The Crow?
 
2012-05-08 05:09:07 PM
assets3.indiemoviesonline.com

What a Fall Guy (and his kick ass truck) might look like.
 
2012-05-08 05:09:09 PM
EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!


Your miserable cockbag of a president was too busy strutting on aircraft carriers and massaging meaty German women to be bothered with pursuing the mass murderer who organized 9/11.
 
2012-05-08 05:09:41 PM
Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Somacandra: bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

Words cannot express how much awesome this shop has.

Who's that between Spawn and Catwoman?


Odd, it looks like the Joker, but that wouldn't fit. And why didn't the 'shopper finish Batman?
 
2012-05-08 05:11:52 PM
timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?


And the first time they attacked Clinton for "Wagging the Dog" away from the Lewinsky scandal.
 
2012-05-08 05:12:40 PM
I Browse: What a Fall Guy (and his kick ass truck) might look like.

If you're going to post pics from The Fall Guy, at least post the right ones...
www.moviemarket.com

img180.imageshack.us
 
2012-05-08 05:12:42 PM
roddack: what_now: Dear Conservatives,

We forgot that Osama Bin Laden was executed without a single loss of an innocent life under President Obama.

Thanks for the reminder.

Love,

The American Public.

Or a trial or with a care about national sovereignty


There was going to be a trial for OBL but the court system was overbooked what with all those trials for the Iraqis killed and detained, ya know.
 
2012-05-08 05:13:30 PM
If Obama walked into a Fark party how many hand jobs would he be offered? I really think you guys have an unhealthy obsession with this dude. He's a politician, not your boyfriend you don't have to defend his every move.

/BTW sorry Obama got ripped, pissed on your couch and threw up in your bed.
 
2012-05-08 05:13:33 PM
This is the shiat that makes it hard to be a RWNJ. I consider myself pretty right leaning, and did not vote for Obama, based solely on a few issues that are important to me, but the GOP focusing so much on religion and tearing into the Dems on issues that shouldn't be up for debate sure does make it hard.
I mean in reality, even I have to admit, that during the current administration, my life really has not changed for the worse. Sure maybe I lost a few tax benefits, but really, nothing, As of this moment, I can still cling to my guns, I still get a paycheck from my job, and he was at the helm when OBL was killed, and has not been a huge sack of Tripel Cre'me on foreign policy, so really nothing has changed for me and my family. I think things would possibly have turned out much worse if Rahm Emanuel had stayed as the right hand man, but that didn't happen, and so we have had a pretty uneventful (in the good sense) presidency.

The GOP just seems to be acting like the Troll at the bridge crossing playing guess what number I am thinking of and you can cross, all the while they are thinking of "Potato". Really makes it hard to be associated in the current climate.
 
2012-05-08 05:14:47 PM
And Ike had a backup memo in case D-Day failed.

i50.tinypic.com

And Nixon had a backup memo in case Apollo 11 failed.

brandonblattner.com

Jesus H. Christ you rightards! You'd attack Obama even if someone's toast got burnt! Just accept the fact that all of your candidates are sociopaths and losers, give up on trying to retake the White House, and BUGGER OFF!
 
2012-05-08 05:15:07 PM
Why are you Republicans so butthurt that Osama is dead? You set him up as the world's most evil super villain from 2001-2008. Shouldn't you be happy that somebody took him out after Bush publicly stated that he was no longer concerned about Bin Laden's whereabouts?

We got him dudes... on to the next threat finally.
 
2012-05-08 05:15:40 PM
pedobearapproved: If Obama walked into a Fark party how many hand jobs would he be offered? I really think you guys have an unhealthy obsession with this dude. He's a politician, not your boyfriend you don't have to defend his every move

We're not defending Obama, there's no need. We're ripping subby for his inability to read.
 
2012-05-08 05:16:15 PM
Oh no, I hope the right stops bringing up the fact that President Obama killed bin Laden.
 
2012-05-08 05:16:16 PM
henryhill: There are alot of things to be pissed off at Obama about. This, or anything related to the OBL killing certainly arent one of them. Why is it so hard for the GOP to admit this? Can't someone be a staunch republican and still say "Hey, you know what, I don't like him, but he got this right."?

Heretic you must burnnnnnnnnnnn
 
2012-05-08 05:18:34 PM
pedobearapproved: If Obama walked into a Fark party how many hand jobs would he be offered? I really think you guys have an unhealthy obsession with this dude. He's a politician, not your boyfriend you don't have to defend his every move.

/BTW sorry Obama got ripped, pissed on your couch and threw up in your bed.


...says the guy who's login links him with pedophiles. Yeah, you are to be taken seriously.
 
2012-05-08 05:18:53 PM
Persnickety: roddack: what_now: Dear Conservatives,

We forgot that Osama Bin Laden was executed without a single loss of an innocent life under President Obama.

Thanks for the reminder.

Love,

The American Public.

Or a trial or with a care about national sovereignty

There was going to be a trial for OBL but the court system was overbooked what with all those trials for the Iraqis killed and detained, ya know.


Quit making my bad attempt at trolling look stupid
 
2012-05-08 05:22:26 PM
I'm sure many of my fellow Republicans must be extremely proud to take this position, but I am not. This is embarrassing.

Please stop.
 
2012-05-08 05:23:02 PM
Republicans love to create alternate realities in their mind to be furious over what obama did in this fantasy land because what actually happened in reality just doesn't fit their agenda.
 
2012-05-08 05:24:08 PM
TV's Vinnie: And Nixon had a backup memo in case Apollo 11 failed.

Now THAT's a backup memo. A short announcement to be read in case of disaster.
 
2012-05-08 05:25:53 PM
Look, I don't care much for Obama. I didn't vote for the man, won't vote for him in the upcoming election and feel (for a wide variety of reasons) that's he's not a good president, isn't competent for the job and whose decisions have actively hurt the United States. He seems like a nice man who's in way over his head at a time when the country can't afford a fumbling novice at the wheel.

All that being said, for all the reasons I don't care for Obama as president, making the call to go get Bin Laden isn't one of them. Unlike a great many people, I am and always will be an American before I'm anything else politically. On Osama's orders and according to his plan, Al Qaeda attacked the United States and killed thousands of people. For that he got a death warrant slapped on his head and rightfully so. When his location was finally discovered he needed to have his ticket punched and Obama gave the order to do just that. The memo is, obviously, an attempt at a little CYA should things go south but that's to be expected and, had things gone down sideways, does anyone believe that memo would have insulated Obama from the political fallout? Of course not.

Fact is: Osama was found hiding within spitting distance of a supposed ally's version of West Point. The inference is that they had to know he was there. Given that hairy bit of info, you have to give the commander in chief credit for saying "fark it and fark them...go get the bastard anyway". It's one of the few things the man has done that I can actually applaud. It doesn't outweigh the damage he's done to the country otherwise (like not knowing the difference between "division" and "multiplication" when it came to his boasts about what he'd do to the deficit) but I cannot find fault with this particular decision. His decision was, in effect, an overt act of war against Pakistan and he damn well knew it...and went ahead anyway. He also had to know just how badly it would backfire if he declined to go and it later was proven they had Osama, knew where he was and let him walk. No way in hell could Obama have survived THAT level of fark-up politically...so, to me, it wasn't even really a decision. He pretty much had no choice.

This memo is much ado about nothing and all it demonstrates is the administration's desire to not have another Jimmy Carter/Iran hostage rescue fark-up Part 2. Big hairy deal. For all the ways to evaluate Obama and be critical of his job performance, this isn't a subject that'll be worth much traction.
 
2012-05-08 05:26:21 PM
haha stupid libs Obama knew he was going to fark the mission up so he set up a fall guy but the patriotic troops pulled one over on the socialist and actually succeeded killing Obama's dirty muslim brother Osama SUCK IT LIBS
 
2012-05-08 05:27:34 PM
falcon176: haha stupid libs Obama knew he was going to fark the mission up so he set up a fall guy but the patriotic troops pulled one over on the socialist and actually succeeded killing Obama's dirty muslim brother Osama SUCK IT LIBS

0/10

Put a little effort into it will you?
 
2012-05-08 05:28:31 PM
Keep bringing up how Obama fulfilled his campaign promise to bring Bin Laden to justice, even if it meant going into Pakistan.

Really, it'll eventually help you guys out. The American people are SO close to turning on him over this, just keep hammering away.
 
2012-05-08 05:29:38 PM
pedobearapproved: If Obama walked into a Fark party how many hand jobs would he be offered? I really think you guys have an unhealthy obsession with this dude.

secoya12.files.wordpress.com

In a way, that's the precise problem of the Republican Party right now. Any genuine, real, substantiative and constructive criticism can't possibly gain any traction because his opponents are so rabidly launching everything but the kitchen sink. If you've busy yelling OMGSOZIALISMBIRFCERTIFICATEHISTORYSGREATESTMONSTERALIENS EVERY SECOND then you aren't offering serious criticism. It helps Obama--it doesn't hurt him. If you want any real criticism to stick then you have to stop yelling various codes for "TEH PREZ IS NEAR!"
 
2012-05-08 05:31:22 PM
The writer of that article seems concerned.

As do most of the herpa-derpa-tastic commenters. Manufactured outrage over an event that not only did not occur, but in fact the opposite of said fantasy event occurred. Now THAT's delusion.
 
2012-05-08 05:31:25 PM
Ricardo Klement: As a conservative, I am ashamed that this got greened.

/Who knew that all Carter needed was a memo?


You are the only real conservative on Fark. I favorite'd you a long time ago as "rational republican" :)
 
2012-05-08 05:31:29 PM
indylaw: Your miserable cockbag of a president was too busy strutting on aircraft carriers and massaging meaty German women to be bothered with pursuing the mass murderer who organized 9/11.

Now, now.

He was our miserable cockbag of a president, too.

/Not that I actually think that, but the President is the President of all USians.
 
2012-05-08 05:32:54 PM
Kirby said no memo would have "given cover to the president." He further said that if Mukasey was referring to that April 2011 memo, that "was written for no other purpose than to record for posterity sake the decision the president has made. It was not delivered to anyone. It was put in a file for the historical record."

Link

Walk to re-election.
 
2012-05-08 05:33:36 PM
RexTalionis: "The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President."

I don't see how you can really interpret that as "setting up a fall guy." The President, though he is the Commander in Chief, is not trained in setting up military raids and would naturally delegate the operational details to a militaryman. This is how every non-military President has done it since time immemorial. It's not as if Lincoln personally plotted out the logistics of Sherman's March across Georgia.


My thoughts exactly. I mean, THIS is "evidence"? God this is ALL they can farking come up with, i guess...
 
2012-05-08 05:33:43 PM
craig328: It doesn't outweigh the damage he's done to the country otherwise (like not knowing the difference between "division" and "multiplication" when it came to his boasts about what he'd do to the deficit) but I cannot find fault with this particular decision.

Just curious if you had the same issue with the GOP inability to differentiate between "supplemental appropriations" and "budgetary appropriations?" Particularly with their obvious confusion about which bucket they should use to fund really expensive luxuries like a full scale invasion of Iraq?

Or do you just not like the fact that Obama the Accountant organized the books so even the slow amongst us could get a better picture of the actual financial state of the nation?
 
2012-05-08 05:34:09 PM
FTA:
"Former U.S. Attorney Michael Mukasey told Fox News...."

Aaaaaand we're done here.

/who will they quote next, Alex Jones?
 
2012-05-08 05:39:02 PM
And how exactly is this unique to President Obama?

Seriously, if you think that President Bush did not have a fall guy for the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq then I have a bridge and a waterfall I would like to sell you.
 
2012-05-08 05:40:57 PM
Mock26: And how exactly is this unique to President Obama?

Seriously, if you think that President Bush did not have a fall guy for the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq then I have a bridge and a waterfall I would like to sell you.


Bush's fall guy is Obama. Who do you think is getting blamed for the hundreds of billions spent achieving nothing?
 
2012-05-08 05:41:52 PM
Whoa whoa whoa. What's this about Osama being killed? I listen to Rush Limbaugh three hours a day and this is the first I've heard of it. When did this happen? 2003? 2006? Early January 2009?
 
2012-05-08 05:46:56 PM
Wow, Fox News is really desperate.

I love it!
 
2012-05-08 05:49:52 PM
timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?


Clinton, tomahawks, tents.....durrrr
 
2012-05-08 05:50:30 PM
Tigger: If Bush hadn't given up on Bin Laden and he'd actually have been shot on his watch then he would appear on the news wearing two New York Fire Department helmets at the same time in front of a banner of an eagle that shiats bacon onto terrorists while drinking champagne from Bin Laden's hollowed out skull.

This is why I love Fark!
 
2012-05-08 05:51:07 PM
FTA:

""One definition of a great leader," Mukasey added later in the interview, "is somebody who takes less credit than he should and takes more blame than he should. And that's not what we've got now."

Kinda like when Bush stood there and said if you criticize him then you're really criticizing the troops? Kinda like that cowardly act?
 
2012-05-08 05:52:18 PM
SH: Geotpf: Here's the memo:

"Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am."

First, how is this setting up McRaven as the fall guy? Seems like more a straight go ahead, with an (obvious) note that if anything changes before it happens, tell the big guy. Also, that's a "a highly lawyered memo'? Really? It's farking handwritten, for fark's sake. Looks like more of a note of a phone call than a "memo", anyways.

Agree 100%. No laying blame or anything of the sort there. Republitards strike again.


I don't understand the GOP need to politicize the death of bin Laden. All it does is remind people that Obama got bin Laden. The GOP strategists should be fired.
 
2012-05-08 05:52:22 PM
Cracks me up how Heroic you people think Obama is for doing his job for once.

Imagine how much the rest of america would love him if he did it all the time.
Lead from the front, empower the people who follow you...
A key fact of leadership, he doesnt get. he leads from the back, empowering the government to buy their votes.
Financial slavery, with a sugary coating.

When people discover they can vote themselves money, that is the death of the republic...
Benjamin Franklin. womanizer and slave owner, (like the rest of the world) but still a genius.
 
2012-05-08 05:52:44 PM
SH: Anyone have any idea what percentage of morons in the USA watch FOX News and buy all their BS? I live sorta close to Cincinnati/Indiana/Dayton and all the hillbilly fools around here watch it 24/7 and take it as gospel.

Please tell me the rest of the country isn't this stupid.


You will get your answer on Wednesday, November 7, 2012.
 
2012-05-08 05:54:02 PM
Magnanimous_J: Most of us hated Bush when he was president, but the Tea Baggers just take it to a whole new level.

Yes, there was a lot of hatred for Bush. The difference being that the hatred for Bush was for things that he actually did.
 
2012-05-08 05:54:55 PM
AverageAmericanGuy: Killing Osama sure put a lot of people back to work in a completely recovered economy.

Keep crowing, libs.


Yeah, because overthrowing Hussein was so great for our economy!
 
2012-05-08 05:55:09 PM
HotWingConspiracy: Oh no, I hope the right stops bringing up the fact that President Obama killed bin Laden.

i235.photobucket.com
THIS BEARS REPEATING
 
2012-05-08 05:55:50 PM
Wow. They really can't handle the fact that the black president made the call to get bin laden. Their racism is just disgusting.
 
2012-05-08 05:56:21 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?

Clinton, tomahawks, tents.....durrrr


You wrote "Dems had two cracks at him" in response to "I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11." Hence my question, since prior to 9/11 he wasn't "the man that ordered the attack." He was known to be a dick and an enemy of the U.S. after the embassy bombings, but not at the same level as he was after the towers, so it's not surprising they didn't spend the same level of resources before that they should have after. I write "should have" because Bush apparently gave up on finding him in early 2002.
 
2012-05-08 05:59:41 PM
Geotpf: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?

And the first time they attacked Clinton for "Wagging the Dog" away from the Lewinsky scandal.


And if he had any balls instead of a humidor full of cigars to pork Monica's sweatbox with, he could have done the job then, and we would not be wasting bandwidth now. Obama is better than Clinton because he plainly tells the media to go blow goats if they don't like it. All Clinton cared about was getting his cigars wet and his public opinion polls. It's a tough job. Obama is better at the game than Bubba was. Just saying....not that it matters now except for stupid pol talking points in 2012. I'm conservative, mostly republican and fricking glad SOMEBODY killed the muthaf*cker. Does not mean I will vote for him, just glad he's dead. 3 preznits, one of them had to get it done. Bush missed in Tora Bora, that was close....but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.
 
2012-05-08 06:00:53 PM
FTFA: "One definition of a great leader," Mukasey added later in the interview, "is somebody who takes less credit than he should and takes more blame than he should. And that's not what we've got now."

Mukasey's certainly one to talk, given his background covering Bush's appointees' asses after Attorney General Gonzales had to step aside.
 
2012-05-08 06:01:31 PM
timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?

Clinton, tomahawks, tents.....durrrr

You wrote "Dems had two cracks at him" in response to "I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11." Hence my question, since prior to 9/11 he wasn't "the man that ordered the attack." He was known to be a dick and an enemy of the U.S. after the embassy bombings, but not at the same level as he was after the towers, so it's not surprising they didn't spend the same level of resources before that they should have after. I write "should have" because Bush apparently gave up on finding him in early 2002.


I'm downplaying nothing. HE's DEAD. OBAMA did it. Fine by me.
 
2012-05-08 06:04:34 PM
Many of the same folks that talked about Bush Derangement Syndrome were apparently unaware of the symptoms of Obama Derangement Syndrome.

I get it. Sometimes your candidate loses. The Internet is chock full of derpy articles like this one, from all sides of the political (and psychological) spectrum, so you can sit all day and read how the other guy is an idiot super genius with a secret agenda to destroy America. It's fun, and has been a national pastime for decades. This isn't about finding fault with you.

I'm just saying that if this article/headline combo doesn't set off your derptector, it's time to take a walk outside for a while. Breathe in the fresh air. Don't worry. You can still think Obama sucks the whole time.

If you're still perseverating about the 'fall guy memo' and can't come up with better reasons to hate him by the time you get back... Seek help.
 
2012-05-08 06:06:47 PM
I'm pretty conservative and even I can't read an article that mentions Hannity.
 
2012-05-08 06:06:57 PM
timujin: I write "should have" because Bush apparently gave up on finding him in early 2002.

Yea, right, the public statement was ' I don't know where he was and I don't care'....at the same time, the CIA under Bush directives was directed to up the ante, get more intel and rope him in. And then do it. It took longer than one pol cycle to make it happen. I don't care. HE'S F*CKING DEAD. Give the credit to Hughey Lewis and and the News, I don't CARE.
 
2012-05-08 06:10:21 PM
The whole "Obama did it wrong, because everything he does is wrong" line is getting awfully tired.

If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

I 100% agree that OBL needed to be brought to justice and I have zero sympathy for he and his followers. It is a slippery slope for the USA though. Was the kill order given because it was operationally impossible to capture? Or was it given because it is politically expedient to dump the body in the ocean and not hold a trial?

Perhaps I am totally mistaken here and it was a "capture or kill" order all along.

Let's not kid ourselves though..if it was a kill order of a political figure in the middle of the night then the term is "assassination".
 
2012-05-08 06:10:29 PM
Plenty of reasons to distrust Obammy. Killing Osama is not one of them. He did it. Now, get me the double play and kill Al Zwahiri and I would really be pleased. Still don't really care who does it or gets the credit. I just want them DEAD.
 
2012-05-08 06:10:56 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?

Clinton, tomahawks, tents.....durrrr

You wrote "Dems had two cracks at him" in response to "I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11." Hence my question, since prior to 9/11 he wasn't "the man that ordered the attack." He was known to be a dick and an enemy of the U.S. after the embassy bombings, but not at the same level as he was after the towers, so it's not surprising they didn't spend the same level of resources before that they should have after. I write "should have" because Bush apparently gave up on finding him in early 2002.

I'm downplaying nothing. HE's DEAD. OBAMA did it. Fine by me.


I don't think I said you were downplaying anything. I only asked because you were responding to "why are the Republicans talking about this?" with "the Dems could have done it years ago." You've gone on to write a whole screed about Clinton and his cigars. I'm still not sure why you're bringing that up, it has nothing to do with the comment you responded to, nor to the thread as a whole.

"Why are the Republicans reminding people Obama ordered the strike on OBL?"
"Clinton didn't kill him. Twice."
"LOLWUT?"
 
2012-05-08 06:12:48 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: I write "should have" because Bush apparently gave up on finding him in early 2002.

Yea, right, the public statement was ' I don't know where he was and I don't care'....at the same time, the CIA under Bush directives was directed to up the ante, get more intel and rope him in. And then do it. It took longer than one pol cycle to make it happen. I don't care. HE'S F*CKING DEAD. Give the credit to Hughey Lewis and and the News, I don't CARE.


Was that what was going on? I took Bush's word at face value, he seemed to be much more concerned about Iraq and not really worried any more about bin Laden. Do you know if the CIA actually did anything?
 
2012-05-08 06:14:26 PM
Two_Noodles: If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

He was a valid military target under the 9/11 AUMF. We no more needed to go out of our way to capture him than we do any other valid military target.
 
2012-05-08 06:15:07 PM
Two_Noodles: The whole "Obama did it wrong, because everything he does is wrong" line is getting awfully tired.

If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

I 100% agree that OBL needed to be brought to justice and I have zero sympathy for he and his followers. It is a slippery slope for the USA though. Was the kill order given because it was operationally impossible to capture? Or was it given because it is politically expedient to dump the body in the ocean and not hold a trial?

Perhaps I am totally mistaken here and it was a "capture or kill" order all along.

Let's not kid ourselves though..if it was a kill order of a political figure in the middle of the night then the term is "assassination".


You cannot assassinate a terrorist. The term assassination is correctly applied to recognized leaders of duly recognized countries. And that does not apply. It was a seek and destroy mission of a duly noted terrorist/'criminal/enemy of the state, without a flag or an embassy. We 'assassinated' no one. We took out the garbage.
 
2012-05-08 06:18:08 PM
Came for the "Brave Sir Robin" reference. Leaving somewhat disappointed.
 
2012-05-08 06:19:57 PM
Asked by Hannity if the memo "was designed to protect the president politically," Mukasey suggested that "there's going to be more that comes tumbling out about that escapade. But so far, that memo is enough."


Translation: This is all I got for now, but when I try to find away to spin some other stuff I will get back to you.
 
2012-05-08 06:20:03 PM
Somacandra: bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

Words cannot express how much awesome this shop has.


Hillary as Wonder Woman makes me lose all my horny though.
 
2012-05-08 06:23:41 PM
Of course it would never be Obama's fault. Nothing ever is.
 
2012-05-08 06:23:42 PM
timujin: I took Bush's word at face value,

As did everyone else. Politics is not what you should consider the breeding ground for facts or truth. What happens daily in that circle once you are the president is beyond any normal ring of information. Believe what you will.
 
2012-05-08 06:25:34 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: Bush missed in Tora Bora, that was close....but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

Bush didn't "miss" at Tora Bora. He "didn't even take a swing" at Tora Bora. That is what makes his ass (and those that apologize for him) such weak sauce.

Bubba Clinton *missed* and all clowns like you did was scream "Wag the dog!!!!!lolz!111" at the top of your lungs.
 
2012-05-08 06:26:25 PM
sprawl15: Two_Noodles: If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

He was a valid military target under the 9/11 AUMF. We no more needed to go out of our way to capture him than we do any other valid military target.


So, it's covered under the "enemy we are at war with" exclusion? Got it.
The Guantanamo precedent makes me twitchy - I think those guys should have gone to court in DC because it sets a much better example for the rest of the world.
 
2012-05-08 06:26:26 PM
Mitch Taylor's Bro: Somacandra: bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

Words cannot express how much awesome this shop has.

Hillary as Wonder Woman makes me lose all my horny though.


It's really odd, but as a conservative, I think the job she has done as Sec of State has been admirable. Even her Preznit hates her and she has done the duty, flown the miles and worked the rooms. Would she have been a better President? I don't really know.
 
2012-05-08 06:29:06 PM
Two_Noodles:

If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.


Osama was given full due process. The process to which he was due is clearly defined under the AUMF, authorized by the United States Congress, and signed into law by President of the United States George W. Bush.

I do not think those words mean what you think they mean.
 
2012-05-08 06:30:36 PM
Two_Noodles: sprawl15: Two_Noodles: If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

He was a valid military target under the 9/11 AUMF. We no more needed to go out of our way to capture him than we do any other valid military target.

So, it's covered under the "enemy we are at war with" exclusion? Got it.


It's not an exclusion. It is a very specific inclusion. The list of people the Congress says the President can use military force against is very well defined, and Osama bin Laden was on it.
 
2012-05-08 06:33:11 PM
This is the biggest farking lie I've ever seen the right wing try to push. I was outraged last week when i heard some right -wing fringe ranter try to push it, but I had no idea it was some kind of coordinated campaign until now.

And here's the important thing: Mukaskey and anyone else who claims this interpretation of the memo KNOW they are lying because the memo says THE EXACT OPPOSITE of that they are claiming and Mukaskey especially ,who has seen such memos before KNOWS it

Admiral McRaven is the commander of JSOC, so OF COURSE he had operational command of the mission that would be like Roosevelt putting Eisenhower in charge of D-Day, in other words exactly what you'd expect.

By putting in the line about briefing the president about additional risks Obama was putting the mission and its risks on HIS shoulders, telling McRaven he could come back to him and double-check if things appeared worse than influentially briefed, not making McR make that call in a vacuum.

And you know WHY the right s do desperate to attack this memo? Because it proves their LAST line of attack, that somehow the Navy SEALS did this all on their own in defiance of Obama's orders, to be the utter bullshiat it always was.
 
2012-05-08 06:33:39 PM
The Rove strategy of taking your enemy's greatest strength and making it their weakness isn't working this time. It has been reported (since days after the raid) that operational control was with Admiral McRaven. Obama took credit for authorizing the raid, which the memo makes clear he did (despite GOP claims last week that it was a coup by Panetta and Hillary). It just seems like Republicans keep reminding us that Bush hesitated at Tora Bora, Romney, McCain, and the rest of the GOP called Obama "naive" when he said that if he had information on Bin Laden's whereabouts and Pakistan either could not or would not act, he would do so unilaterally. In short, this isn't ever going to be a winning issue for them, no matter how much CYA Obama was doing, the reality is that Osama Bin Laden is very much dead now, whereas if I believe McCain and Romney, they would likely have tipped our hand to Pakistan and the ISI would have once again helped Bin Laden escape.

McCain, Clinton rag him for saying he would do just what he did.
 
2012-05-08 06:33:54 PM
Brave, brave, brave, brave Obama!

pinktape.co.uk


/is that David Duchovny playing the minstrel?
 
2012-05-08 06:34:28 PM
Rent Party: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Bush missed in Tora Bora, that was close....but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

Bush didn't "miss" at Tora Bora. He "didn't even take a swing" at Tora Bora. That is what makes his ass (and those that apologize for him) such weak sauce.

Bubba Clinton *missed* and all clowns like you did was scream "Wag the dog!!!!!lolz!111" at the top of your lungs.


How little you know about the Tora Bora campaign......didn't take a swing? jeezus...what a stupid thing to say.

The really odd part is about public perception being driven by media whores. At the time, I remember thinking, and still to this day, I couldn't care less if Bill Clinton was f*cking goats and little choir boys. I just wanted him to get the job done. We knew about AQ back then, and Bubba flinched/missed because he could not handle the heat in the kitchen.. These facts are irrefutable. But Bush.....
 
2012-05-08 06:36:31 PM
I am starting to see an advantage to TotalFark in this thread.

Pre-Green: Some discourse, but mostly rational with many of the posters actually reading the article.

Post-Green: DERP!!!
 
2012-05-08 06:36:56 PM
Magorn: This is the biggest farking lie I've ever seen the right wing try to push. I was outraged last week when i heard some right -wing fringe ranter try to push it, but I had no idea it was some kind of coordinated campaign until now.

If you think that was the biggest lie, try this one from a few days after Osama was killed.
 
2012-05-08 06:38:19 PM
cameroncrazy1984: jbc: Did EnviroDud, best known around here for giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda, just admit in this thread that Obama was able to "get it right"?

Apparently he takes issue with the SEALs' training methods, though. Maybe he can tell one of them directly that ten months is too long.


I'd pay to how they'd respond to his derp.
 
2012-05-08 06:39:21 PM
Well at least Obama learned ONE thing from Jimmy Carter.
 
2012-05-08 06:39:21 PM
Surool: Why are you Republicans so butthurt that Osama is dead? You set him up as the world's most evil super villain from 2001-2008. Shouldn't you be happy that somebody took him out after Bush publicly stated that he was no longer concerned about Bin Laden's whereabouts?

We got him dudes... on to the next threat finally.



Actually, OBL was not that important as of about 2006.

Link
 
2012-05-08 06:40:33 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: Rent Party: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Bush missed in Tora Bora, that was close....but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

Bush didn't "miss" at Tora Bora. He "didn't even take a swing" at Tora Bora. That is what makes his ass (and those that apologize for him) such weak sauce.

Bubba Clinton *missed* and all clowns like you did was scream "Wag the dog!!!!!lolz!111" at the top of your lungs.

How little you know about the Tora Bora campaign......didn't take a swing? jeezus...what a stupid thing to say.


I know that the CIA operative specifically tasked with catching bin Laden during the battle of Tora Bora states that he and his team knew *exactly* where bin Laden was, asked for additional troop support to get him, and was denied. He even went so far as to write a book about it.

In other words, Bush didn't even take a swing.

But I'm sure your brother-in-law's cousin was a Marine Core soldier and knows better, right?
 
2012-05-08 06:40:48 PM
mrlewish: So when is Former U.S. Attorney Michael Mukasey going to be arrested for revealing Top Secret information?

That would mean the administration would have to admit (or take actions that the public might interpret as an admission) that Mukasey's allegations have truth to them.

People capable of logical thought could be persuaded simply by pointing out that Mukasey hasn't offered any proof that such a memo ever existed, nor was he at the time in a position where he would have had access to any memos drafted but not released by Leon Panetta. The herpers are going to believe this derp no matter what.
 
2012-05-08 06:41:54 PM
bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

Why is Spawn there?
 
2012-05-08 06:42:39 PM
A memo like this would be SOP for any President, regardless of the letter denoting their political affiliation that precedes him (or her). Google "Operation Eagle Claw" for reasons why.

The thing that upsets people that aren't blinded by the fact that Obama is a dem, or black, or a "sekrit muslim" is the credit he took for it. This document is not damning, nor should it be surprising to anyone who knows anything about the CYA nature of politics, but it does fly in the face of the credit taken after it was successful.
 
2012-05-08 06:47:35 PM
I'm not friend of Obama, but then again, I don't like 90% of the presidents I've lived to see. But there hasn't been a president that hasn't done the same thing. Republican or Democrat
 
2012-05-08 06:47:50 PM
belhade: Brave, brave, brave, brave Obama!

[pinktape.co.uk image 200x242]


/is that David Duchovny playing the minstrel?


Considering he would have been around 15 when the movie was made, I don't think so
 
2012-05-08 06:49:04 PM
To clarify, when I say "proof that such a memo existed", I mean one that says what Mukasey claims it says, as the one that's been made public clearly doesn't.

Basically, Mukasey read a memo that says "If anything unexpected happens, the buck shall stop at the President's desk" and interpreted it as "If anything unexpected happens, the buck shall stop anywhere but the President's desk," which is downright potato.
 
2012-05-08 06:49:04 PM
Non-story here. We don't even have real proof that Osama is dead.
 
2012-05-08 06:50:57 PM
Geotpf: Here's the memo:

"Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am."

[dailycaller.com image 640x713]

First, how is this setting up McRaven as the fall guy? Seems like more a straight go ahead, with an (obvious) note that if anything changes before it happens, tell the big guy. Also, that's a "a highly lawyered memo'? Really? It's farking handwritten, for fark's sake. Looks like more of a note of a phone call than a "memo", anyways.


Looks legit. You can tell by the totally unphotoshoppable stationary.
 
2012-05-08 06:51:27 PM
Rent Party: Two_Noodles: sprawl15: Two_Noodles: If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

He was a valid military target under the 9/11 AUMF. We no more needed to go out of our way to capture him than we do any other valid military target.

So, it's covered under the "enemy we are at war with" exclusion? Got it.

It's not an exclusion. It is a very specific inclusion. The list of people the Congress says the President can use military force against is very well defined, and Osama bin Laden was on it.


Ok, so it wasn't illegal. I guess it's just semantics then.
as·sas·si·nate [uh-sas-uh-neyt]
verb (used with object), as·sas·si·nat·ed, as·sas·si·nat·ing.
to kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously.

Now...was OBL not a political figure? was he not killed in the middle of the night?
He was a criminal, a terrorist (the classical definition: someone who attempts political change through violence, not the little kid who won't eat his vegetables definition we have now) and..I contend: a politically prominent person.
 
2012-05-08 06:52:59 PM
As an Aussie I find this whole issue quite bemusing.

It astonishes me that the US Right is attacking Obama because he killed Osama bin Laden. I can't put it any more simply than that.

The dude deserved to die, and your duly-elected President had him killed. Nobody mourned. And yet the same cretins who approved of attacking Iraq for no goddamned reason and want to elect another Republican who'll attack Iran for no goddamned reason apparently have a problem with this.

What the fark is wrong with you people?
 
2012-05-08 06:54:03 PM
que.guero: Surool: Why are you Republicans so butthurt that Osama is dead? You set him up as the world's most evil super villain from 2001-2008. Shouldn't you be happy that somebody took him out after Bush publicly stated that he was no longer concerned about Bin Laden's whereabouts?

We got him dudes... on to the next threat finally.


Actually, OBL was not that important as of about 2006.

Link


I'm talking about how Republicans talked about him, not how the CIA viewed him. Your link is irrelevant.
 
2012-05-08 06:54:49 PM
Worst use of the HERO tag evar.
 
2012-05-08 06:56:43 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: We knew about AQ back then, and Bubba flinched/missed because he could not handle the heat in the kitchen..

So your point is that Obama succeeded where 'Bubba' failed?

I guess that means he's a good president and can handle 'the heat in the kitchen' and you should vote for him.
 
2012-05-08 06:59:32 PM
mjbok: A memo like this would be SOP for any President, regardless of the letter denoting their political affiliation that precedes him (or her). Google "Operation Eagle Claw" for reasons why.

The thing that upsets people that aren't blinded by the fact that Obama is a dem, or black, or a "sekrit muslim" is the credit he took for it. This document is not damning, nor should it be surprising to anyone who knows anything about the CYA nature of politics, but it does fly in the face of the credit taken after it was successful.


WTF are you people even talking about. He authorized the mission and put a military guy in charge of it. Are you really this stupid?
 
2012-05-08 07:01:36 PM
It would be great if all republicans would die.
Soon.
 
2012-05-08 07:02:04 PM
The fraud did not kill Bin Laden, and it's pathetic that anyone falls for such a weak story. I thought Farkers were famous for their braaaaains...
 
2012-05-08 07:02:13 PM
Trapper439: What the fark is wrong with you people?

Rupert Murdoch discovered that people who are worked up into a frenzy of anger over political issues are more valuable targets to media advertisers than people who think calmly and rationally for themselves.
 
2012-05-08 07:02:17 PM
Two_Noodles: Rent Party: Two_Noodles: sprawl15: Two_Noodles: If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

He was a valid military target under the 9/11 AUMF. We no more needed to go out of our way to capture him than we do any other valid military target.

So, it's covered under the "enemy we are at war with" exclusion? Got it.

It's not an exclusion. It is a very specific inclusion. The list of people the Congress says the President can use military force against is very well defined, and Osama bin Laden was on it.

Ok, so it wasn't illegal. I guess it's just semantics then.
as·sas·si·nate [uh-sas-uh-neyt]
verb (used with object), as·sas·si·nat·ed, as·sas·si·nat·ing.
to kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously.

Now...was OBL not a political figure? was he not killed in the middle of the night?
He was a criminal, a terrorist (the classical definition: someone who attempts political change through violence, not the little kid who won't eat his vegetables definition we have now) and..I contend: a politically prominent person.


He was no more "assasinated" than any other high level commander was. Ulysses Grant didn't "assassinate" Sidney Johnston at Shilo and Tojo didn't "assasinate" Simon Buckner at Okinawa. They're soldiers, they get shot at, and they get killed.

And the disposition of the enemy troops is absolutely irrelevant when it comes to attacking them. If you find a hundred enemy troops asleep in their tents, you don't politely wake them up, you mortar the place until they're dead.

There is absolutely *nothing* unique or special about bin Laden's demise, other than the fact we had to wait through eight years of gross incompetence before we found someone with the stones to go in and dig him out.
 
2012-05-08 07:03:13 PM
Two_Noodles: Rent Party: Two_Noodles: sprawl15: Two_Noodles: If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

He was a valid military target under the 9/11 AUMF. We no more needed to go out of our way to capture him than we do any other valid military target.

So, it's covered under the "enemy we are at war with" exclusion? Got it.

It's not an exclusion. It is a very specific inclusion. The list of people the Congress says the President can use military force against is very well defined, and Osama bin Laden was on it.

Ok, so it wasn't illegal. I guess it's just semantics then.
as·sas·si·nate [uh-sas-uh-neyt]
verb (used with object), as·sas·si·nat·ed, as·sas·si·nat·ing.
to kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously.

Now...was OBL not a political figure? was he not killed in the middle of the night?
He was a criminal, a terrorist (the classical definition: someone who attempts political change through violence, not the little kid who won't eat his vegetables definition we have now) and..I contend: a politically prominent person.


Then let's start shooting enemy armies with tranquilizer darts and EMP grenades, haul all of them over to the US, and give each and every one of them full due process of law.

If we have to be so politically correct that we can't even fire a bullet at an enemy combatant without reading him Miranda rights, then we might as well just roll over and tell the world to stomp on our stomach.
 
2012-05-08 07:05:14 PM
PsiChi: The fraud did not kill Bin Laden, and it's pathetic that anyone falls for such a weak story. I thought Farkers were famous for their braaaaains...

Could you at least put some effort into it? If trolling has gotten that boring, maybe you should find another hobby.
 
2012-05-08 07:05:41 PM
Keizer_Ghidorah:
Then let's start shooting enemy armies with tranquilizer darts and EMP grenades, haul all of them over to the US, and give each and every one of them full due process of law.


People should stop saying this.

bin Laden *got* full due process of law, as described quite clearly in the AUMF.
 
2012-05-08 07:07:31 PM
The My Little Pony Killer: Meanwhile, Subby faps in a dark closet using only his tears and snot as lube...

/hey, just like the dumbass who keeps submitting deadmoran.com links!


I prefer more of a "dry rub" style myself.
 
2012-05-08 07:10:08 PM
SH: Geotpf: Here's the memo:

"Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am."

First, how is this setting up McRaven as the fall guy? Seems like more a straight go ahead, with an (obvious) note that if anything changes before it happens, tell the big guy. Also, that's a "a highly lawyered memo'? Really? It's farking handwritten, for fark's sake. Looks like more of a note of a phone call than a "memo", anyways.

Agree 100%. No laying blame or anything of the sort there. Republitards strike again.


Pretty much true. This was a memo confirming presidential permission to conduct the raid. All it does is establish McCraven as the to-go guy, the OIC, the HMFWC, etc. In short, if the raid had failed, McCraven would have been OFF the hook. The memo does exactly the opposite of what the article claims. It's the bureaucrat's version of, "The president commands you to do xxxxxx." And it is as noted a Memo for the Record.
 
2012-05-08 07:11:08 PM
Rent Party: Keizer_Ghidorah:
Then let's start shooting enemy armies with tranquilizer darts and EMP grenades, haul all of them over to the US, and give each and every one of them full due process of law.

People should stop saying this.

bin Laden *got* full due process of law, as described quite clearly in the AUMF.


I was being sarcastic.
 
2012-05-08 07:14:09 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: belhade: Brave, brave, brave, brave Obama!

[pinktape.co.uk image 200x242]


/is that David Duchovny playing the minstrel?

Considering he would have been around 15 when the movie was made, I don't think so


Sure, the timeframe is off but it certainly looks like him!
 
2012-05-08 07:16:38 PM
Trapper439: As an Aussie I find this whole issue quite bemusing.

It astonishes me that the US Right is attacking Obama because he killed Osama bin Laden. I can't put it any more simply than that.

The dude deserved to die, and your duly-elected President had him killed. Nobody mourned. And yet the same cretins who approved of attacking Iraq for no goddamned reason and want to elect another Republican who'll attack Iran for no goddamned reason apparently have a problem with this.

What the fark is wrong with you people?


Fundamentalist Zealots and Corporate Personhood for a start.
 
2012-05-08 07:19:12 PM
Dammit. The ignore list doesn't work if you guys keep responding to all these douchenozzles.
 
2012-05-08 07:19:57 PM
Rent Party:

He was no more "assasinated" than any other high level commander was. Ulysses Grant didn't "assassinate" Sidney Johnston at Shilo and Tojo didn't "assasinate" Simon Buckner at Okinawa. They're soldiers, they get shot at, and they get killed.

And the disposition of the enemy troops is absolutely irrelevant when it comes to attacking them. If you find a hundred enemy troops asleep in their tents, you don't politely wake them up, you mortar the place until they're dead.

There is absolutely *nothing* unique or special about bin Laden's demise, other than the fact we had to wait through eight years of gross incompetence ...

You give two examples..both killed on a battlefield: Johnston likely an accident during a charge, Buckner by artillery. So the difference being: not in their home, not in a midnight raid, not terribly politically significant.

I think it was an assassination, it probably was the right thing to do and probably the right way to do it. I'm just not sure if I should weep for my country or not.
 
2012-05-08 07:20:15 PM
henryhill: There are alot of things to be pissed off at Obama about. This, or anything related to the OBL killing certainly arent one of them. Why is it so hard for the GOP to admit this? Can't someone be a staunch republican and still say "Hey, you know what, I don't like him, but he got this right."?

Hey you know what, I don't like him, but he got this right.

/not hard
//am able to give credit where credit is due
 
2012-05-08 07:23:24 PM
Two_Noodles: Rent Party:

He was no more "assasinated" than any other high level commander was. Ulysses Grant didn't "assassinate" Sidney Johnston at Shilo and Tojo didn't "assasinate" Simon Buckner at Okinawa. They're soldiers, they get shot at, and they get killed.

And the disposition of the enemy troops is absolutely irrelevant when it comes to attacking them. If you find a hundred enemy troops asleep in their tents, you don't politely wake them up, you mortar the place until they're dead.

There is absolutely *nothing* unique or special about bin Laden's demise, other than the fact we had to wait through eight years of gross incompetence ...

You give two examples..both killed on a battlefield: Johnston likely an accident during a charge, Buckner by artillery. So the difference being: not in their home, not in a midnight raid, not terribly politically significant.

I think it was an assassination, it probably was the right thing to do and probably the right way to do it. I'm just not sure if I should weep for my country or not.


So, we should have waited for Osama to walk out into the middle of a battlefield and scream "SHOOT ME!!" in order for it to be fair and nice, or something?
 
2012-05-08 07:24:30 PM
Republican tears are so awesome.

This has been the best year of politics I have experienced.

Thank you Teabaggers.

Oh no Bin Laden is dead! Now what religious guy will you idolize!
 
2012-05-08 07:26:20 PM
BritneysSpeculum: EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!

Dude, your guy did not have the balls to pull the trigger at all so STFU.


Who, Clinton?
 
2012-05-08 07:27:10 PM
Keizer_Ghidorah: Rent Party: Keizer_Ghidorah:
Then let's start shooting enemy armies with tranquilizer darts and EMP grenades, haul all of them over to the US, and give each and every one of them full due process of law.

People should stop saying this.

bin Laden *got* full due process of law, as described quite clearly in the AUMF.

I was being sarcastic.


I realize your intent was to be sarcastic, and I understand your intent (and you are correct in your feelings) so please allow me to explain why your sarcasm failed. Sarcasm generally requires you to state the *opposite* of what happened. Like when you say "and give each and every one of them full due process of law," when that is, in fact, exactly what happened, it fails to be sarcasm. Sarcasm would be "and give each and every one of them a lawyer and a trial..." something to which he was not entitled.

bin Laden *got* full due process.
 
2012-05-08 07:27:23 PM
mycatisposter: I'm pretty conservative and even I can't read an article that mentions Hannity.

lynnrockets.files.wordpress.com
"Gee, ain't I a stinker?"
 
2012-05-08 07:28:45 PM
Geotpf: First, how is this setting up McRaven as the fall guy? Seems like more a straight go ahead, with an (obvious) note that if anything changes before it happens, tell the big guy. Also, that's a "a highly lawyered memo'? Really? It's farking handwritten, for fark's sake. Looks like more of a note of a phone call than a "memo", anyways.

Not that I disagree with anything you said, but notice the time discrepancy. Memo written 10 minutes before the information was conveyed.

Should make for some nice conspiracy theories. I'm not sure what exactly, but they'll come up with something.
 
2012-05-08 07:31:27 PM
SH: Anyone have any idea what percentage of morons in the USA watch FOX News and buy all their BS? I live sorta close to Cincinnati/Indiana/Dayton and all the hillbilly fools around here watch it 24/7 and take it as gospel.

Please tell me the rest of the country isn't this stupid.


Don't know about the rest of the country, but there's too many of them in Louisiana! Thankfully, we're not all like that down here.
 
2012-05-08 07:34:03 PM
Two_Noodles: Rent Party:

He was no more "assasinated" than any other high level commander was. Ulysses Grant didn't "assassinate" Sidney Johnston at Shilo and Tojo didn't "assasinate" Simon Buckner at Okinawa. They're soldiers, they get shot at, and they get killed.

And the disposition of the enemy troops is absolutely irrelevant when it comes to attacking them. If you find a hundred enemy troops asleep in their tents, you don't politely wake them up, you mortar the place until they're dead.

There is absolutely *nothing* unique or special about bin Laden's demise, other than the fact we had to wait through eight years of gross incompetence ...

You give two examples..both killed on a battlefield: Johnston likely an accident during a charge, Buckner by artillery. So the difference being: not in their home, not in a midnight raid, not terribly politically significant.


The battlefield is where they battle is, sport. When SEALs land in a combat helicopter and start shooting, that's a battle. bin Laden was killed on the battlefield, too. Johnston was more highly regarded than Lee by Jefferson Davis. Your attempt at dismissing his "political" importance is akin to dismissing Eisenhower's or Macarthur's. And the fact that it was "his home" is completely irrelevant. Outside of standing passively with his hands up actively trying to surrender, it matters not one whit where he was, or what he was doing when he got killed. Command and control centers are highly valuable military targets. If it's also your home office, tough shiat.


I think it was an assassination, it probably was the right thing to do and probably the right way to do it. I'm just not sure if I should weep for my country or not.


You can think it was an assassination all you like. What you should really weep for is your cognitive abilities. Outside of your feelings, there is not one single fact that would lead someone to claim "assassination."
 
2012-05-08 07:35:56 PM
Rent Party: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Bush missed in Tora Bora, that was close....but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

Bush didn't "miss" at Tora Bora. He "didn't even take a swing" at Tora Bora. That is what makes his ass (and those that apologize for him) such weak sauce.

Bubba Clinton *missed* and all clowns like you did was scream "Wag the dog!!!!!lolz!111" at the top of your lungs.


In point of fact, at Tora Bora, Bush ordered the US special forces to stand down and hand over the operational control of the offensive to capture Bind laden to the Afghan forces even though he KNEW the local commander was suspected of having pro-Taliban sympathies or at least that his loyalty was for sale to the highest bidder, and in fact, that commander and his forces drew down on US special forces after they tried to ignore a "cease fire" he negotiated with bin Laden's forces, that was designed to give OBL time to escape. (for all that we' almost got him. The reason we captured his driver was because Osama sent him out to test whether the US could tap his satellite phone, and made a call to an associate saying he was in the car we intercepted)

The ONLY reason I can think of for Bush acting that stupidly during the Battle of Tora Bora was a recognition that if we caught Bin laden there and then, a lot of people would have asked the question "then why the fark do we need to invade Iraq again?"
 
2012-05-08 07:36:46 PM
"One definition of a great leader," Mukasey added later in the interview, "is somebody who takes less credit than he should and takes more blame than he shouldgives all credit for anything good that happened to republicans no matter how incompetent they are. And that's not what we've got now."

/accuracy
 
2012-05-08 07:37:16 PM
Galwran: Speeches written in case the Normandy landings or the moon mission failed

Of course, DDE was the operational commander for D-Day. It was his baby. It wasn't FDR's baby.

As for the moon shot, I would imagine the head of NASA would be the one to say something had things failed. But Nixon making the possible speech would not be so bad as much as a top(est) level commiseration of a tragic loss.
 
2012-05-08 07:39:16 PM
Rent Party: Keizer_Ghidorah: Rent Party: Keizer_Ghidorah:
Then let's start shooting enemy armies with tranquilizer darts and EMP grenades, haul all of them over to the US, and give each and every one of them full due process of law.

People should stop saying this.

bin Laden *got* full due process of law, as described quite clearly in the AUMF.

I was being sarcastic.

I realize your intent was to be sarcastic, and I understand your intent (and you are correct in your feelings) so please allow me to explain why your sarcasm failed. Sarcasm generally requires you to state the *opposite* of what happened. Like when you say "and give each and every one of them full due process of law," when that is, in fact, exactly what happened, it fails to be sarcasm. Sarcasm would be "and give each and every one of them a lawyer and a trial..." something to which he was not entitled.

bin Laden *got* full due process.


Dude, I'm on YOUR side. I KNOW how it works. My comment was "If we're gonna whine that Osama wasn't given what you want, let's start arresting all the enemy combatants and give them trials to make up for it* snarkiness. Geez, let's not start attacking our comrades, hm?
 
2012-05-08 07:40:53 PM
timujin: I Browse: What a Fall Guy (and his kick ass truck) might look like.

If you're going to post pics from The Fall Guy, at least post the right ones...
[www.moviemarket.com image 254x368]

[img180.imageshack.us image 249x320]


Oh yeah. Heather Thomas >> Heather Locklear.

(Even now.)
 
2012-05-08 07:44:48 PM
Two_Noodles: Rent Party:

He was no more "assasinated" than any other high level commander was. Ulysses Grant didn't "assassinate" Sidney Johnston at Shilo and Tojo didn't "assasinate" Simon Buckner at Okinawa. They're soldiers, they get shot at, and they get killed.

And the disposition of the enemy troops is absolutely irrelevant when it comes to attacking them. If you find a hundred enemy troops asleep in their tents, you don't politely wake them up, you mortar the place until they're dead.

There is absolutely *nothing* unique or special about bin Laden's demise, other than the fact we had to wait through eight years of gross incompetence ...

You give two examples..both killed on a battlefield: Johnston likely an accident during a charge, Buckner by artillery. So the difference being: not in their home, not in a midnight raid, not terribly politically significant.

I think it was an assassination, it probably was the right thing to do and probably the right way to do it. I'm just not sure if I should weep for my country or not.


Because we broke the "Urgent Purple" code the Japanese navy was using, we found out the route that Japanese naval commander Admiral Yamamoto was flying in an unarmed cargo plane. We dispatched three squadrons of fighters to shoot him down over the Pacific. Is that an "assassination" in your book?

In Vietnam, The legendary sniper, Carlos Whitefeather Hathcock , executed at least 93 NVA officers or Vietcong Political leaders with a sniper rifle. Were those "assassinations"?
 
2012-05-08 07:47:20 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: GWLush: Man, it really hurts the Republicans deep down in their soul to know that Osama was killed under a Dems watch. I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11. I guess they forgot.

Dems had two cracks at him, so yea, you're only batting .500

Still glad he's fish food.


Yeah, and the republican crybabies are batting 0 on that acount. Your point? (besides the one on top of your head.)
 
2012-05-08 07:51:43 PM
dericwater: Galwran: Speeches written in case the Normandy landings or the moon mission failed

Of course, DDE was the operational commander for D-Day. It was his baby. It wasn't FDR's baby.


Uhhhh, no. Overlord was FDR and Churchill's baby. It was in the works for almost a year before they were kind enough to inform Stalin about it at the Tehran conference. Ike wasn't even selected Supreme Allied Commander until after that conference and FDR had to convince Churchill that Ike over Montgomery was the way to go. In other words, Ike was selected specifically to execute Overlord, not come up with it.

In context, this memo would have said "President approves Overlord. Operational control is with Ike. Keep him informed if anything changes. Goal is to invade France, knock over the rest of Europe, and go home."
 
2012-05-08 07:53:14 PM
Keizer_Ghidorah:

Dude, I'm on YOUR side. I KNOW how it works. My comment was "If we're gonna whine that Osama wasn't given what you want, let's start arresting all the enemy combatants and give them trials to make up for it* snarkiness. Geez, let's not start attacking our comrades, hm?


I know you are. That is why it is important to inform folks that bin Laden got full due process, rather than imply that he didn't.

It's OK! Honest!
 
2012-05-08 07:53:17 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: Mitch Taylor's Bro: Somacandra: bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

Words cannot express how much awesome this shop has.

Hillary as Wonder Woman makes me lose all my horny though.

It's really odd, but as a conservative, I think the job she has done as Sec of State has been admirable. Even her Preznit hates her and she has done the duty, flown the miles and worked the rooms. Would she have been a better President? I don't really know.


I agree. I thought she might spend more time sniping at her political rival, but she's done an admirable job in a political environment that's probably a little tougher than even Condoleezza had to deal with (simply because now our allies are broke and the Middle East uprisings tossed out old, unpopular allies with new, popular leaders who are more influenced by religion than I am comfortable with).

That said, my comment wasn't about her ability to do her job. It was simply...

This is Wonder Woman:
images2.fanpop.com

This is your penis on Wonder Woman:
www.discountsteel.com

This is your penis on Hillary Clinton:
2.bp.blogspot.com

Any questions? :-)
 
2012-05-08 07:59:34 PM
if that raid failed, we would have never known who the target was. just some high level al quaeda operative.
 
2012-05-08 08:00:32 PM
colon_pow: if that raid failed, we would have never known who the target was. just some high level al quaeda operative.

Do you honestly think we would have so egregiously violated Pakistan's airspace for some un-named operative?
 
2012-05-08 08:05:28 PM
Conservatives never change, they just fade away.

Some things are more important than self interest.

See you in November.
 
2012-05-08 08:06:38 PM
AverageAmericanGuy: Killing Osama sure put a lot of people back to work in a completely recovered economy.

Keep crowing, libs.


Let me guess, everything would have been fixed already if just we lowered taxes on the absurdly wealthy to a level that is even lower than now, which is already lower than where they were during 6 of Reagan's years.

You know where we need them? 24%. Right where they were in 1929.
 
2012-05-08 08:07:02 PM
Magorn: Two_Noodles: Rent Party:

He was no more "assasinated" than any other high level commander was. Ulysses Grant didn't "assassinate" Sidney Johnston at Shilo and Tojo didn't "assasinate" Simon Buckner at Okinawa. They're soldiers, they get shot at, and they get killed.

And the disposition of the enemy troops is absolutely irrelevant when it comes to attacking them. If you find a hundred enemy troops asleep in their tents, you don't politely wake them up, you mortar the place until they're dead.

There is absolutely *nothing* unique or special about bin Laden's demise, other than the fact we had to wait through eight years of gross incompetence ...

You give two examples..both killed on a battlefield: Johnston likely an accident during a charge, Buckner by artillery. So the difference being: not in their home, not in a midnight raid, not terribly politically significant.

I think it was an assassination, it probably was the right thing to do and probably the right way to do it. I'm just not sure if I should weep for my country or not.

Because we broke the "Urgent Purple" code the Japanese navy was using, we found out the route that Japanese naval commander Admiral Yamamoto was flying in an unarmed cargo plane. We dispatched three squadrons of fighters to shoot him down over the Pacific. Is that an "assassination" in your book?

In Vietnam, The legendary sniper, Carlos Whitefeather Hathcock , executed at least 93 NVA officers or Vietcong Political leaders with a sniper rifle. Were those "assassinations"?


Those both fit the definition, so: yes.
 
2012-05-08 08:10:57 PM
Two_Noodles: Magorn: Two_Noodles: Rent Party:

He was no more "assasinated" than any other high level commander was. Ulysses Grant didn't "assassinate" Sidney Johnston at Shilo and Tojo didn't "assasinate" Simon Buckner at Okinawa. They're soldiers, they get shot at, and they get killed.

And the disposition of the enemy troops is absolutely irrelevant when it comes to attacking them. If you find a hundred enemy troops asleep in their tents, you don't politely wake them up, you mortar the place until they're dead.

There is absolutely *nothing* unique or special about bin Laden's demise, other than the fact we had to wait through eight years of gross incompetence ...

You give two examples..both killed on a battlefield: Johnston likely an accident during a charge, Buckner by artillery. So the difference being: not in their home, not in a midnight raid, not terribly politically significant.

I think it was an assassination, it probably was the right thing to do and probably the right way to do it. I'm just not sure if I should weep for my country or not.

Because we broke the "Urgent Purple" code the Japanese navy was using, we found out the route that Japanese naval commander Admiral Yamamoto was flying in an unarmed cargo plane. We dispatched three squadrons of fighters to shoot him down over the Pacific. Is that an "assassination" in your book?

In Vietnam, The legendary sniper, Carlos Whitefeather Hathcock , executed at least 93 NVA officers or Vietcong Political leaders with a sniper rifle. Were those "assassinations"?

Those both fit the definition, so: yes.


We're so sorry. From now on we'll make sure to call our targets and let them know we're coming so they can saddle up and meet us in glorious battle.

1.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-05-08 08:14:33 PM
Rev. Skarekroe: To be fair, they only do this every other year. You know, election year. In come the paid trolls and off they go.

Which would be pathetic but people could deal with it. However, they are really pissing on things because they are deleting posts that call them out on this more and more.
 
2012-05-08 08:30:44 PM
Ooh, main page. Someone's website needs numbers to show advertisers.
You don't want to go down this path on the main page, Drew. Short term gain for a long term sacrifice.
 
2012-05-08 08:44:08 PM
Keizer_Ghidorah: Because we broke the "Urgent Purple" code the Japanese navy was using, we found out the route that Japanese naval commander Admiral Yamamoto was flying in an unarmed cargo plane. We dispatched three squadrons of fighters to shoot him down over the Pacific. Is that an "assassination" in your book?

In Vietnam, The legendary sniper, Carlos Whitefeather Hathcock , executed at least 93 NVA officers or Vietcong Political leaders with a sniper rifle. Were those "assassinations"?

Those both fit the definition, so: yes.

We're so sorry. From now on we'll make sure to call our targets and let them know we're coming so they can saddle up and meet us in glorious battle.


After reflection: I was wrong to call both of those assassinations. Those targets had far more military value than symbolic or political value. Although Yamamoto has considerable political value.

Bin Laden on the other hand had a lot less military value than symbolic and political value at the time of his death.
 
2012-05-08 08:46:05 PM
God-is-a-Taco: Ooh, main page. Someone's website needs numbers to show advertisers.
You don't want to go down this path on the main page, Drew. Short term gain for a long term sacrifice.


Please, do share your deep, meaningful insights on the best way of running a news aggregate site. I'm sure Drew would appreciate the pointers!
 
2012-05-08 08:47:33 PM
If Obama "killed" Osama, then Obama also "killed" Brian Terry. Bloodthirsty mofo.
 
2012-05-08 08:56:40 PM
Ooooh, subby.... don't go spreading facts around here. This is LibTardTown.

And the Dear Leader Must Not Be Defiled!
 
2012-05-08 09:13:43 PM
I like how he jumped out of the Afro-American Hawk at 75,000 feet, and using wings made out of Moochelle's excess arm flaps, stealthly desecended to the Earth, in Pakistanilandi.

Entered Osama's compund by using his Jedi mind tricks, involving high teched stuff that none of ya's would ever understand.

And then, wielding his NoBalls Piece Prix as a mace, beat Osama's womenfolk to death.

Unable to escape the horror that is the fist of an angry 0bama, Osama took the easy way out, using a Craftsmans 17.625 Volt drill and a 19/32nd drillbit.
 
2012-05-08 09:14:54 PM
www.charlierose.com
Would Still Blow Obama Anyway
 
2012-05-08 09:16:28 PM
Pantubo: Ooooh, subby.... don't go spreading facts around here. This is LibTardTown.

And the Dear Leader Must Not Be Defiled!


Account created: 2012-05-03 10:06:40
 
2012-05-08 09:17:21 PM
Slam1263: I like how he jumped out of the Afro-American Hawk at 75,000 feet, and using wings made out of Moochelle's excess arm flaps, stealthly desecended to the Earth, in Pakistanilandi.

Entered Osama's compund by using his Jedi mind tricks, involving high teched stuff that none of ya's would ever understand.

And then, wielding his NoBalls Piece Prix as a mace, beat Osama's womenfolk to death.

Unable to escape the horror that is the fist of an angry 0bama, Osama took the easy way out, using a Craftsmans 17.625 Volt drill and a 19/32nd drillbit.


Account created: 2011-05-16 11:37:31

Election year trolls!
 
2012-05-08 09:18:31 PM
Rent Party: dericwater: Galwran: Speeches written in case the Normandy landings or the moon mission failed

Of course, DDE was the operational commander for D-Day. It was his baby. It wasn't FDR's baby.


Uhhhh, no. Overlord was FDR and Churchill's baby. It was in the works for almost a year before they were kind enough to inform Stalin about it at the Tehran conference. Ike wasn't even selected Supreme Allied Commander until after that conference and FDR had to convince Churchill that Ike over Montgomery was the way to go. In other words, Ike was selected specifically to execute Overlord, not come up with it.

In context, this memo would have said "President approves Overlord. Operational control is with Ike. Keep him informed if anything changes. Goal is to invade France, knock over the rest of Europe, and go home."


Yes, basically, that's what I meant: FDR and Churchill may be the parents of Overlord, but they handed over the day-to-day operations of the, uh, operation to DDE. Neither FDR nor Churchill were going to be hanging out at the situation room directing mortar fire or getting reports from the sea-borne invasion groups.

So it was justified that DDE wrote the "I'm sorry" note in case things went bad.
 
2012-05-08 09:18:46 PM
poot_rootbeer: Lt. Cheese Weasel: We knew about AQ back then, and Bubba flinched/missed because he could not handle the heat in the kitchen..

So your point is that Obama succeeded where 'Bubba' failed?

I guess that means he's a good president and can handle 'the heat in the kitchen' and you should vote for him.


And if you had read any of this thread, and didn't have your head up your ass, you would know I already said that. Except for the vote part.
 
2012-05-08 09:26:07 PM
Surool: pedobearapproved: If Obama walked into a Fark party how many hand jobs would he be offered? I really think you guys have an unhealthy obsession with this dude. He's a politician, not your boyfriend you don't have to defend his every move.

/BTW sorry Obama got ripped, pissed on your couch and threw up in your bed.

...says the guy who's login links him with pedophiles. Yeah, you are to be taken seriously.


I'm a 12 year old girl...duh

/geez learn to read
 
2012-05-08 09:45:18 PM
And if he DIDN'T delegate operational control to an actual officer, they'd ride his ass about "he thinks he knows better than real soldiers". He could have personally shot Bin Laden with an assault rifle painted like the American flag and Republicans would biatch that his outfit wasn't appropriate. They're going to criticize every thing he does no matter what, so I succinctly respond FARK OFF. I'm sorry, I've lost my patience with these morons.
 
2012-05-08 09:45:26 PM
I love how this was just supposed to have happened all along, with or without Obama. Bush had over seven years, and it just happens to occur in the middle of Obama's term.

I would much rather have a great conservative in office, but I'm probably going to vote for the shiatty left again. We get the same spending with Republicans, but at least we get our real enemies with Democrats.
 
2012-05-08 09:49:43 PM
Truncks1: Ricardo Klement: As a conservative, I am ashamed that this got greened.

/Who knew that all Carter needed was a memo?

You are the only real conservative on Fark. I favorite'd you a long time ago as "rational republican" :)


Thank you. I've been trying, so I am glad to see it's been at least modestly successful.
 
2012-05-08 09:50:51 PM
NateGrey: Pantubo: Ooooh, subby.... don't go spreading facts around here. This is LibTardTown.

And the Dear Leader Must Not Be Defiled!

Account created: 2012-05-03 10:06:40


What a f*cking coward.
 
2012-05-08 10:13:06 PM
Does this surprise anyone? That anyone with the where withal to become preaident is probably such a dickbag they care more about covering their ass than serving the country?

Nothing our self serving gov does surprises me anymore.

The message they are giving us? Hurray for me, and fark everyone else.

I'd say it's been this way since Reagan.
 
2012-05-08 10:17:34 PM
thnksqrd:

Please, do share your deep, meaningful insights on the best way of running a news aggregate site. I'm sure Drew would appreciate the pointers!


I just did. I don't care enough to go into paragraph territory about it.
 
2012-05-08 10:18:03 PM
I didn't know Mukasey was such a frothing right-winger. I thought they brought him in because he was *relatively* moderate. Jeebus.
 
2012-05-08 10:36:02 PM
Oh, shut up.

www.howlinwolfstudio.com
 
2012-05-08 10:53:21 PM
Novart: I love how this was just supposed to have happened all along, with or without Obama. Bush had over seven years, and it just happens to occur in the middle of Obama's term.

I would much rather have a great conservative in office, but I'm probably going to vote for the shiatty left again. We get the same spending with Republicans, but at least we get our real enemies with Democrats.


Of course, the best thing would be if both sides stopped seeing each other as enemies and started seeing each other as fellow Americans and human beings, and then worked together to fix this dying country.

But we all know the chances of that happening are zero percent. Both sides have become so retarded and infantile that they'd rather see America and all its people destroyed just to spite each other. The Kingdom Hearts fandom is less divided than Reps and Dems.
 
2012-05-08 10:55:03 PM
Aarontology: EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!

Teabaggers: Pro-Osama because they hate Obama.


THIS
 
2012-05-08 11:05:28 PM
I haven't had this much fun reading a tread since Fleet Admiral Kerry got torpedoed.
 
2012-05-08 11:06:48 PM
You know, I didn't vote for President Obama. I wouldn't vote for him (or former Gov. Romney) if the election were today and you held a gun to my head.

That said, how in the HOLY fark does anyone with half a brain in their heads get the idiotic notion that this:

"The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration."

Is Panetta setting up Admiral McRaven as a "fall guy" if the op went bad?

Did you fail reading comprehension, is English not your native language, or are you just a farking idiot?

I don't even like President Obama, politically speaking, but that memo very clearly and very specifically places all responsibility for approving the op and giving the order (or rescinding the order due to new intel information) squarely on the President's shoulders. Subby, pull your head out of your ass.
 
2012-05-08 11:16:02 PM
Aigoo: You know, I didn't vote for President Obama. I wouldn't vote for him (or former Gov. Romney) if the election were today and you held a gun to my head.

That said, how in the HOLY fark does anyone with half a brain in their heads get the idiotic notion that this:

"The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration."

Is Panetta setting up Admiral McRaven as a "fall guy" if the op went bad?

Did you fail reading comprehension, is English not your native language, or are you just a farking idiot?

I don't even like President Obama, politically speaking, but that memo very clearly and very specifically places all responsibility for approving the op and giving the order (or rescinding the order due to new intel information) squarely on the President's shoulders. Subby, pull your head out of your ass.


Can't let facts and common sense get in the way of a smear campaign. People are so desperate to paint Obama in as bad a light as possible they'll say and do anything.
 
2012-05-08 11:23:28 PM
Geotpf: Here's the memo:

"Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am."

[dailycaller.com image 640x713]

First, how is this setting up McRaven as the fall guy? Seems like more a straight go ahead, with an (obvious) note that if anything changes before it happens, tell the big guy. Also, that's a "a highly lawyered memo'? Really? It's farking handwritten, for fark's sake. Looks like more of a note of a phone call than a "memo", anyways.


GOPer desperation is painful to watch.
 
2012-05-08 11:54:02 PM
pedobearapproved: Surool: pedobearapproved: If Obama walked into a Fark party how many hand jobs would he be offered? I really think you guys have an unhealthy obsession with this dude. He's a politician, not your boyfriend you don't have to defend his every move.

/BTW sorry Obama got ripped, pissed on your couch and threw up in your bed.

...says the guy who's login links him with pedophiles. Yeah, you are to be taken seriously.

I'm a 12 year old girl...duh

/geez learn to read


...read it before you post it... when it isn't even real. You are one f*cked up dude.
 
2012-05-09 12:02:17 AM
Keizer_Ghidorah: Of course, the best thing would be if both sides stopped seeing each other as enemies and started seeing each other as fellow Americans and human beings, and then worked together to fix this dying country.

But we all know the chances of that happening are zero percent. Both sides have become so retarded and infantile that they'd rather see America and all its people destroyed just to spite each other. The Kingdom Hearts fandom is less divided than Reps and Dems.



You're right, and this will never happen. Just peruse this thread and how many "I just wish all Republicans would die" variations are there. The right is not any better as far as being against everyone on the left. It's always us against them, but the us should be the people and the them should be the elected officials, but the government has most people so blindly allied with "their side" that everyone that might see something differently is evil, retarded, should die, etc.
 
2012-05-09 12:08:18 AM
kmmontandon: i145.photobucket.com

Preacher for teh win!
 
2012-05-09 12:17:43 AM
mjbok: Keizer_Ghidorah: Of course, the best thing would be if both sides stopped seeing each other as enemies and started seeing each other as fellow Americans and human beings, and then worked together to fix this dying country.

But we all know the chances of that happening are zero percent. Both sides have become so retarded and infantile that they'd rather see America and all its people destroyed just to spite each other. The Kingdom Hearts fandom is less divided than Reps and Dems.


You're right, and this will never happen. Just peruse this thread and how many "I just wish all Republicans would die" variations are there. The right is not any better as far as being against everyone on the left. It's always us against them, but the us should be the people and the them should be the elected officials, but the government has most people so blindly allied with "their side" that everyone that might see something differently is evil, retarded, should die, etc.


Republicans say the same things, and if a Repub was in office it would be the same only reversed. Both sides are doing things that make people angry with them, and they refuse to change or stop because it riles up their opponents. It's like sports team rivalry with the fate of the United States of America on the line.

Both parties need to be dissolved and rebuilt, and the US population needs to wake up, smarten up, and remember that the people control the government, not the other way around.
 
2012-05-09 01:09:05 AM
Obama didn't kill Bin Laden,Bush didn't kill Bin Laden . The Seals did. The president didn't have a damn thing to do with it other than giving the go ahead.
 
2012-05-09 01:09:18 AM
Is Obama still black? (checks) Oh Dammit!
 
2012-05-09 01:30:52 AM
Keizer_Ghidorah: Republicans say the same things, and if a Repub was in office it would be the same only reversed. Both sides are doing things that make people angry with them, and they refuse to change or stop because it riles up their opponents. It's like sports team rivalry with the fate of the United States of America on the line.

Both parties need to be dissolved and rebuilt, and the US population needs to wake up, smarten up, and remember that the people control the government, not the other way around.


I don't think you understand the nature of the conflict. It's not about party and dissolving the parties will have no effect. The federalist and anti-federalist factions have been duking it out since our country began and they will continue duking it out as long as our Constitution exists. The party labels change, the wedge issues change, the particular set of factional alliances change, but the philosophical underpinning of the conflict is unresolvable. Which is as it should be, because neither side is completely right. This conflict is part of our national DNA and that will never change.
 
2012-05-09 02:00:37 AM
Codenamechaz: Guess because they couldn't get the bullshiat greened yesterday, they're gonna try again today.

It was on Hannity, surely its an accurate report that hasn't been spun in any way.

THIS is the crap that makes republicans look bad. people making a big deal out of something stupid to attempt to discredit actual accomplishments.

Obama's record is bad enough that you do NOT have to pull this crap. This just backfires on you when you do this and makes him a sympathetic victim of BS.
 
2012-05-09 02:06:59 AM
Preparing a scapegoat ahead of time? We learn this in Administration 101.
 
2012-05-09 02:45:36 AM
Mentat: Keizer_Ghidorah: Republicans say the same things, and if a Repub was in office it would be the same only reversed. Both sides are doing things that make people angry with them, and they refuse to change or stop because it riles up their opponents. It's like sports team rivalry with the fate of the United States of America on the line.

Both parties need to be dissolved and rebuilt, and the US population needs to wake up, smarten up, and remember that the people control the government, not the other way around.

I don't think you understand the nature of the conflict. It's not about party and dissolving the parties will have no effect. The federalist and anti-federalist factions have been duking it out since our country began and they will continue duking it out as long as our Constitution exists. The party labels change, the wedge issues change, the particular set of factional alliances change, but the philosophical underpinning of the conflict is unresolvable. Which is as it should be, because neither side is completely right. This conflict is part of our national DNA and that will never change.


When it gets to the point that neither side cares about anything but sticking it to the other, then they've failed. Destroy them and build two more parties that actually care about the country and its people instead of their petty little spiteful rivalries.
 
2012-05-09 05:50:10 AM
The buck stops...with that other guy.
 
2012-05-09 05:51:28 AM
When danger reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Brave, brave Sir Obama
 
2012-05-09 06:47:21 AM
The article quotes bartender/ditchdigger-cum-commentator redneck Sean Hannity extensively, so I totally believe it.
 
2012-05-09 07:47:16 AM
GWLush: Man, it really hurts the Republicans deep down in their soul to know that Osama was killed under a Dems watch. I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11. I guess they forgot.

Deep down, modern Republicans will never forgive a Democrat for winning World War II.

Seriously, it used to be a serious party, with serious issues.

Now? they've got nothing but false religious ire. The Dems are no great prize, but they look like senior statesmen compared to these clowns.
 
2012-05-09 07:51:02 AM
BritneysSpeculum: EnviroDude: Considering he mulled the decision to pull the trigger for 10 months so he could "get it right", this is not a shock.

Captain Obama - avenger at large!

Dude, your guy did not have the balls to pull the trigger at all so STFU.


Who, Clinton?
 
2012-05-09 08:22:58 AM
JonnyBGoode: When danger reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Brave, brave Sir Obama


Is this some sort of competition on who can be the biggest idiot?

I think you are winning.
 
2012-05-09 09:00:29 AM
Rent Party: craig328: It doesn't outweigh the damage he's done to the country otherwise (like not knowing the difference between "division" and "multiplication" when it came to his boasts about what he'd do to the deficit) but I cannot find fault with this particular decision.

Just curious if you had the same issue with the GOP inability to differentiate between "supplemental appropriations" and "budgetary appropriations?" Particularly with their obvious confusion about which bucket they should use to fund really expensive luxuries like a full scale invasion of Iraq?

Or do you just not like the fact that Obama the Accountant organized the books so even the slow amongst us could get a better picture of the actual financial state of the nation?



Your post seems to suggest that "Obama the Accountant" decided to include "supplemental appropriations" and "budgetary appropriations" when calculating the deficit debt as though these items hadn't been accounted for before. As though literally millions of accountants and hundreds of millions of citizens lacked the requisite insight into accounting practices and that Barack Obama was the sole possessor of such rapier-like insights.

Of course that's just thin, transparent idiocy on your part employed only to make a political point to attempt to dilute the fact that Barack Obama pledged to HALVE the deficit and instead, via his presented budgets (which didn't include "supplemental appropriations") DOUBLED the deficit. It was an interesting attempt but it highlights what is probably the biggest problem in this county which is that people, when it comes to political discourse, identify themselves via their "team" first and only as Americans second. Obama's presented budgets don't magically contain new categories of items that previous presidents failed to include. If you truly believe that then, I'm sorry, but you're simply wrong. Let me simply throw out the numbers (which don't have a bias or skew) and you try and view them without the "rah rah, go my team" filter:

Barack Obama's 4 budgets during his administration and their attendant deficits:
- 2013 (proposed budget), $1300 billion
- 2012, $1327 billion (numbers from here down are actual)
- 2011, $1560 billion
- 2010, $1267 billion

I expressed those numbers as billions because it is indeed helpful, as your point tried to do, to compare these numbers to the previous 4 budgets:
- 2009, $1413 billion
- 2008, $455 billion
- 2007, $161 billion
- 2006, $248 billion

Notice that 2009 number? Yeah, that was the previous administration's last submitted budget. That budget as submitted had a deficit of $407 billion. Of course, Obama was in office in 2009 and his "supplemental appropriations" and "budgetary appropriations" and the actions of his allies in Congress were what caused that number to skyrocket.

Please notice that these are just numbers. They're not red or blue. They're the cold hard facts of what the current president has presided over since he's been in office. If that's not enough then perhaps you'll take a moment to consider this:

When President Obama took office, the debt of the United States was $6.3 trillion ($6300 billion). If his 2013 proposed budget passes as he presented it (it won't but it's the only number we have to work with and would be the second lowest deficit of his administration...which isn't likely to be the case when 2013 is said and done), he will have added $5.454 trillion ($5454 billion) in new debt. It took the country 230 years to amass $6.3 trillion...it took Obama's crew merely 4 years to add another $5.4 trillion.

Again, those numbers aren't partisan. They're simply facts. Those numbers are so large that most people have no real grasp on how much that is. It's actually a disservice to express those numbers in trillions because just 5 years ago, all budget deficits where expressed with a term a power lower than what we regularly use now. If that still doesn't register, try this handy graphic:

i819.photobucket.com

Those bars are new debt and not the total debt. They're ADDING to the debt...and before you try and dispute the numbers, those come from the CBO.

THAT'S the mess we're in and it's the case irrespective of smoke and mirror attempts to derail the conversation. As I said, I think he did a great thing ordering the whack on Osama (as well as telling the Navy to smoke those pirates off Somalia earlier on) but it's these deficits and the absolute financial disaster they represent that has me saying that I won't vote for him.
 
2012-05-09 09:26:02 AM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?

Clinton, tomahawks, tents.....durrrr


vs. doing jack-shiat between 1/20/01 and 9/11/01.

Seriously, keep talking about it.
 
2012-05-09 09:32:58 AM
craig328: THAT'S the mess we're in and it's the case irrespective of smoke and mirror attempts to derail the conversation. As I said, I think he did a great thing ordering the whack on Osama (as well as telling the Navy to smoke those pirates off Somalia earlier on) but it's these deficits and the absolute financial disaster they represent that has me saying that I won't vote for him.

So, are you supporting the guy whose top two economic advisors are Bush guys.

Romney's top two economic advisors are men who served as George W. Bush's top economic advisors: Glenn Hubbard and Greg Mankiw. If anyone can remember what happened to the U.S. economy under George Bush, it would have to be these two distinguished economists.

...

Her comment deserves more than the usual cheap "gotcha." Because it is, at least insofar as economic policy is concerned, 100 percent accurate. Hubbard and Mankiw provide the evidence. Hubbard is famous for his role as a chief architect of the Bush tax cuts. If any single non-politician can be blamed for turning the budget surpluses of the Clinton years into the crippling deficits of the Bush era, thus leaving the United States woefully unprepared to deal with a disastrous recession, it's got to be Glenn Hubbard.

And guess what, Romney is currently proposing to lower taxes even further on the richest Americans!

(Hubbard was most proud of his work lowering the taxes on dividends and capital gains, which he described as the "the most pro-growth tax reform that anybody did since Kennedy." However, as Businessweek pointed out, GDP growth under Bush averaged a paltry 2.7 percent from the end of the 2001 recession until December 2007 - the slowest growth, at that point, registered under any U.S. president since the end of World War II.

Greg Mankiw is famous for a little flap during the Bush reelection campaign when he annoyed the White House by declaring that free trade and outsourcing of jobs "was probably a plus for the American economy in the long run." Mankiw's views were certainly not exceptional for an economist, and didn't actually contravene Bush administration priorities, but they were considered a little insensitive to actually say out loud while the economy was struggling during an election year - particularly in all-important Rust Belt states pounded by globalization. Eight years later, Mankiw's role in the Romney brain trust suggest that we shouldn't be counting on any fresh thinking about how to respond to the challenges of globalization.

More important, Mankiw was and is a critic of financial sector regulation. We all know where that got us during the Bush administration. But sure enough, today, Romney is campaigning on an agenda that includes rolling back Obama's efforts at banking reform.


Romney and his advisors haven't forgotten what it was like under George Bush. They are campaigning with the explicit promise to return to the economic agenda of Bush. And if Americans vote for team Romney, they should not be surprised at what they get.


So, to fix the struggling economy, you'd rather have people who put it into the toilet in the first place.
 
2012-05-09 10:06:44 AM
rufus-t-firefly: So, are you supporting the guy whose top two economic advisors are Bush guys.

Romney's top two economic advisors are men who served as George W. Bush's top economic advisors: Glenn Hubbard and Greg Mankiw. If anyone can remember what happened to the U.S. economy under George Bush, it would have to be these two distinguished economists.

[redacted to cut down on the derp]

So, to fix the struggling economy, you'd rather have people who put it into the toilet in the first place.


I have a better question: you trust Obama and his team? Seriously?

I'll go ahead and skip your obvious disconnect between my point of deficits and your wonderfully nebulous "struggling economy" as though the two are the same thing. They're not but, sure, do you really want to suggest that anyone in their right mind would vote for Obama based on his leadership vis-a-vis the economy the past 4 years? Really?

Get this through your thick, biased, politically-blinded skull: not liking what Obama's done doesn't equate to loving Romney and his folk. Is that the best you can do though? You simply can't discuss Obama's achievements with the economy because he has none...so your best rebuttal is to point at the other guy and say it's all their fault? In your world, when does Obama become responsible for the things that happen under his watch? Are you suggesting that it's somehow the fault of people who served his predecessor that Obama submitted budgets whose deficits were in the trillions each and every time? How the f*ck is that anyone's fault but his own?

A responsible voting citizen ought to be able to objectively look at the candidates and discern their achievements and failures. I'd say doubling the federal deficit in only 4 years qualifies as a failure. I'd say 10% unemployment was a failure. I'd say a "recovery" that has more fits and misfires than any previous recovery is a semi-failure. I suspect you'll try oh so very hard to say "it was Bush's fault...he got us into this mess" and for you and yours, because you simply cannot entertain an objective viewpoint, that serves as your justification for supporting a guy who, single-handedly has brought the nation to the brink of financial disaster.

His stimulus failed abysmally, his health care initiative is about to be struck down (rightfully so, BTW) because he and his didn't possess the character or balls to make the stand for the program that was truly needed (single payer) and yet he continues to submit budgets that feature ever more borrowing against the futures of our children and grandchildren...and for what?

My criticisms of Obama's performance concern ONLY Barack Obama and his performance. That you cannot discuss them without pointing at literally anyone but him says way more about you than me.
 
2012-05-09 10:30:49 AM
craig328: Notice that 2009 number? Yeah, that was the previous administration's last submitted budget. That budget as submitted had a deficit of $407 billion. Of course, Obama was in office in 2009 and his "supplemental appropriations" and "budgetary appropriations" and the actions of his allies in Congress were what caused that number to skyrocket.

Link

It's hard to take you seriously when you lie like that.
 
2012-05-09 10:34:51 AM
craig328: His stimulus failed abysmally,

Link

Hmm economists vs a ranting lunatic on fark.
 
2012-05-09 10:40:08 AM
craig328: His stimulus failed abysmally

No, it didn't.
 
2012-05-09 10:40:54 AM
RexTalionis: "The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President."

I don't see how you can really interpret that as "setting up a fall guy." The President, though he is the Commander in Chief, is not trained in setting up military raids and would naturally delegate the operational details to a militaryman. This is how every non-military President has done it since time immemorial. It's not as if Lincoln personally plotted out the logistics of Sherman's March across Georgia.


Yep. The only way this would produce a fall guy is if someone withheld some additional risk assessment from the president.

Non issue.

Those that just really have having a N*** in the whitehouse are going to have to face up to the facts: We have hindsight now but at the time Obama made the call it was not guaranteed that Osama was even there. He had the balls to basically send an invasion force into a foreign country where the fallout would be bad whether things worked or not. It was a tough call, and also a campaign promise fullfilled. If people can't give him credit here then they are just partisan shatbirds.
 
2012-05-09 10:44:36 AM
You should probably go ahead and read that first link...you know, past the headline. I don't think it says what you think it says.

As for the second one: that's an article about what the White House claimed at the time of the article. You remember those claims, right? The ones that kept having to be revised month after month because the numbers were far rosier than originally claimed? You're seriously quoting a crowing of jobs claims when, at the time, unemployment was rampant? Uh...okay, I guess.

But hey, like I said, if you think he's done a great job, vote for the man. Nothing of what you posted has rebutted the numbers I mentioned...although it has reinforced the colored label you earned long ago. I also like how facts (Obama's budget numbers as reported by the CBO) = "ranting lunatic". I'm sorry they don't make your favorite look better but blaming the messenger doesn't change the message.
 
2012-05-09 10:45:36 AM
Dusk-You-n-Me: craig328: His stimulus failed abysmally

No, it didn't.


Oh? Did you get one of those "shovel ready" jobs? How did that work out for you?
 
2012-05-09 10:50:06 AM
craig328: Oh? Did you get one of those "shovel ready" jobs? How did that work out for you?

I'm not sure what my employment status has to do with your being wrong on the stimulus. But go you.
 
2012-05-09 10:51:32 AM
craig328: You should probably go ahead and read that first link...you know, past the headline. I don't think it says what you think it says.

As for the second one: that's an article about what the White House claimed at the time of the article. You remember those claims, right? The ones that kept having to be revised month after month because the numbers were far rosier than originally claimed? You're seriously quoting a crowing of jobs claims when, at the time, unemployment was rampant? Uh...okay, I guess.

But hey, like I said, if you think he's done a great job, vote for the man. Nothing of what you posted has rebutted the numbers I mentioned...although it has reinforced the colored label you earned long ago. I also like how facts (Obama's budget numbers as reported by the CBO) = "ranting lunatic". I'm sorry they don't make your favorite look better but blaming the messenger doesn't change the message.


Are you talking to me?

FY 2009 was under the Bush presidency. You can obfuscate all you like but it won't change the truth.

Also you dismissing everything because of some wingnut talking points. Makes sense.
 
2012-05-09 11:37:58 AM
Keizer_Ghidorah: When it gets to the point that neither side cares about anything but sticking it to the other, then they've failed. Destroy them and build two more parties that actually care about the country and its people instead of their petty little spiteful rivalries.

Again, you don't get it. It's not a war between parties, it's a war between factions, and changing the names of those factions won't do anything. This is and always has been the fundamental divide in our country. The intensity ebbs and flows, but the conflict always remains.
 
2012-05-09 12:01:01 PM
craig328:
Your post seems to suggest that "Obama the Accountant" decided to include "supplemental appropriations" and "budgetary appropriations" when calculating the deficit debt as though these items hadn't been accounted for before.


I'm stating categorically that your "fiscal conservative" Bush funded two wars through supplemental appropriations, which, coincidently enough, aren't reported as part of the budget. Obama fixed that, and all the right wing morons (such as yourself) went ZOMG!!! HE QUINTUPLUPED THE DEBTZ!!!!"

Damn near every dollar spent over the last four years has been done in order to clean up the GOP's mess.
 
2012-05-09 12:23:46 PM
bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

that's the stupidest thing I've ever seen. LOLing at the idea of some Obama dork churning that out, thinking it was so awesome.
 
2012-05-09 12:26:42 PM
Rent Party: craig328:
Your post seems to suggest that "Obama the Accountant" decided to include "supplemental appropriations" and "budgetary appropriations" when calculating the deficit debt as though these items hadn't been accounted for before.

I'm stating categorically that your "fiscal conservative" Bush funded two wars through supplemental appropriations, which, coincidently enough, aren't reported as part of the budget. Obama fixed that, and all the right wing morons (such as yourself) went ZOMG!!! HE QUINTUPLUPED THE DEBTZ!!!!"

Damn near every dollar spent over the last four years has been done in order to clean up the GOP's mess.



Before I get ahead of myself in assessing your argument, I want to confirm that you understand that there is a difference between the overall debt and the portion of that debt that is the product of presented budgets. You understand that the numbers in the CBO chart I posted are the former and not the latter, right?

If we're both operating from that first understanding, let me see if I understand this correctly...it's your belief that all the war spending was ignored by the CBO when they put out numbers for annual federal debt until Obama came into office. Further, it seems to be your contention that a fair amount of the moneys that represent the deficits that Obama keeps presenting in his budgets is due to our war efforts in Afghanistan and our presence in Iraq, right?

My concern is that you appear to hold the belief that the CBO's formula for expressing the amount of federal debt we hold changed when Obama came into office. Either that or you're claiming that where Bush funded the war via appropriations and the like, Obama budgeted it...and your contention is that the numbers the CBO puts our ONLY reflect presented budgets and not all federal spending.

I'm going to go ahead and hope you can discern the obvious flaw with what you seem to feel is an important point. If not let me state it baldly:

The CBO counts ALL federal debt in assessing debt and the deficit regardless of whether it was budgeted or whether it was later acquired via "supplemental appropriations". In other words, to the CBO, your argument would be fallacious at best and intentionally obtuse at worst.

Debt is debt is debt. The numbers they compile and publish are fairly stark and they're not reflective of them somehow magically changing a formula to make Obama look bad. The numbers look bad because they ARE bad.
 
2012-05-09 12:43:28 PM
Just so we can all work with actual numbers, the amount of federal debt that Obama inherited when he took office stood at $10.626 trillion. That IS inclusive of budgets, appropriations and so on. That is the most comprehensive number used and can be found in this CBS article here.

The amount of debt we have as of the moment I write this is $15.7 trillion.

The article in the first link is via CBS which, I hope, is a suitably neutral enough source...although the numbers I mention are found practically anywhere you like to look. And since you're fond of "B-b-b-bush" the article is quite clear that, yeah, he contributed his fair share to the debt:

"The Debt rose $4.899 trillion during the two terms of the Bush presidency. It has now gone up $4.939 trillion since President Obama took office."

But you really do have to come up with something better when Obama is on a pace doubling even the worst Bush did while in office. He's more than done in his 3+ years than Bush did in 8. I get it that nothing is Barry's fault and it's all on George so I'll just ask: when do you hold Obama responsible for what's been going on during his watch?

I know you'll completely skip his submitted budgets' inherent deficits and totally pretend that Obama doesn't spend via "supplemental appropriations" as though he simply doesn't use that process (he does) but even with all that, when do you hold him responsible? Ever?
 
2012-05-09 01:25:07 PM
craig328: even with all that, when do you hold him responsible? Ever?

"Holding him responsible" presupposes that anything that increases the deficit is always an incorrect course of action, an idea which I categorically reject.
 
2012-05-09 02:04:15 PM
Subby AND Mr. Panetta sure are reading A LOT into that memo. And by "reading into" I mean "making shiat up."
 
2012-05-09 02:06:27 PM
Halli: JonnyBGoode: When danger reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Brave, brave Sir Obama

Is this some sort of competition on who can be the biggest idiot?

I think you are winning.


Nope, you just pulled ahead of me. Grow a funnybone.

elchupacabra: Came for the "Brave Sir Robin" reference. Leaving somewhat disappointed.

There, is that better? First thing the headline reminded me of, as well. You're welcome. :)
 
2012-05-09 02:14:34 PM
GWLush: This is what we have to look forward to isn't it? Republicans trying to downplay Obama accomplishments. Even the one where he had Osama Bin Ladendkilled. Osama Bin Laden, the guy who planned and carried out the attacks on 9/11. Republicans are no longer allowed to call themselves Patriots. It is abundantly clear that they have put party way before country.

That much was clear when they started using 9/11 to push their own pet legislation within a month of the attacks.
 
2012-05-09 02:18:00 PM
JonnyBGoode: Halli: JonnyBGoode: When danger reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Brave, brave Sir Obama

Is this some sort of competition on who can be the biggest idiot?

I think you are winning.

Nope, you just pulled ahead of me. Grow a funnybone.

elchupacabra: Came for the "Brave Sir Robin" reference. Leaving somewhat disappointed.

There, is that better? First thing the headline reminded me of, as well. You're welcome. :)


You see that reference is really only funny when it makes sense. Like when it was used about James O'Keefe who ran back to his mom's basement the other day. You just came off as a stupid wingnut.
 
2012-05-09 02:22:10 PM
Halli: JonnyBGoode: Halli: JonnyBGoode: When danger reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Brave, brave Sir Obama

Is this some sort of competition on who can be the biggest idiot?

I think you are winning.

Nope, you just pulled ahead of me. Grow a funnybone.

elchupacabra: Came for the "Brave Sir Robin" reference. Leaving somewhat disappointed.

There, is that better? First thing the headline reminded me of, as well. You're welcome. :)

You see that reference is really only funny when it makes sense. Like when it was used about James O'Keefe who ran back to his mom's basement the other day. You just came off as a stupid wingnut.


And you're coming off as a bitter partisan leftie, or at the very least a sourpuss. I wasn't even thinking politics when I posted what I did, I was just riffing off the damn headline (as I'm sure elchupacabra was thinking, though I didn't see his post when I posted mine).

That's what really burns me about partisans on both sides: Absolutely no sense of humor or joyuix de vivre Laugh a little, even at your own side once in a while. You'll live longer.
 
2012-05-09 02:23:38 PM
JonnyBGoode: Halli: JonnyBGoode: Halli: JonnyBGoode: When danger reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Brave, brave Sir Obama

Is this some sort of competition on who can be the biggest idiot?

I think you are winning.

Nope, you just pulled ahead of me. Grow a funnybone.

elchupacabra: Came for the "Brave Sir Robin" reference. Leaving somewhat disappointed.

There, is that better? First thing the headline reminded me of, as well. You're welcome. :)

You see that reference is really only funny when it makes sense. Like when it was used about James O'Keefe who ran back to his mom's basement the other day. You just came off as a stupid wingnut.

And you're coming off as a bitter partisan leftie, or at the very least a sourpuss. I wasn't even thinking politics when I posted what I did, I was just riffing off the damn headline (as I'm sure elchupacabra was thinking, though I didn't see his post when I posted mine).

That's what really burns me about partisans on both sides: Absolutely no sense of humor or joyuix de vivre Laugh a little, even at your own side once in a while. You'll live longer.


Maybe you should try being funny.
 
2012-05-09 02:38:36 PM
what_now: Cyberluddite: I guess in this case, downvoting this thread seems to have gotten it greened.

Personally, I support the GOP plan to constantly remind voters that Obama killed Bin Laden.


President Obama was the Seal who pulled the trigger?

President Obama did the right thing in authorizing this mission. But the credit should go to all those involved - and the President shouldn't continue to act like he is the ONE who killed Osama.
The fact that you Fark Progressives are so blinded by him is humorous. This memo is pretty clear - President Obama authorized the mission - but all of the details, the actual action that resulted in Osama's death and the successful evacuation of our troops is due to the success of others. The Admiral mentioned deserves more credit for "killing" Osama than the President does.

One question - when Obama loses in November will there be mass depression amongst you true believers?
 
2012-05-09 05:59:16 PM
Overfiend:

One question - when Obama loses in November will there be mass depression amongst you true believers?


Are you truly so delusional as to believe this?

I support neither party nor their presumptive nominees, but I would be stunned to see President Obama lose to former Governor Romney. It'd be like watching the ventriloquist lose to the dummy.
 
2012-05-09 06:14:45 PM
Aigoo: Overfiend:

One question - when Obama loses in November will there be mass depression amongst you true believers?

Are you truly so delusional as to believe this?

I support neither party nor their presumptive nominees, but I would be stunned to see President Obama lose to former Governor Romney. It'd be like watching the ventriloquist lose to the dummy.


I guess we'll have to wait and see in early November.

Yes, I really believe Romney will win the presidency.

Feel free to bash me for my beliefs. I am used to it as one of the few Farkers who supports some conservative ideals!

/yeah I know, poor me
//welcome to Fark!
///I cry every night...sniff sniff
 
2012-05-09 08:44:44 PM
Aigoo: I support neither party nor their presumptive nominees, but I would be stunned to see President Obama lose to former Governor Romney. It'd be like watching the ventriloquist lose to the dummy.

There is still so much time between now and then. The summer before Clinton beat Bush I there was no way it was going to happen.
 
2012-05-09 11:43:43 PM
Overfiend: I am used to it as one of the few Farkers who supports some conservative ideals!

the few, the proud?

no, the many and the loud.
 
2012-05-11 06:21:59 PM
Dusk-You-n-Me: Big Man On Campus: Obama was the one who pulled the trigger now??

Osama was the one flying the plane?

The right has nothing.


Actually just had this very same argument on Facebook with a Pauldroid friend of mine. In the end, I finally got him to give Obama credit for coordinating and ordering the operation. Only the second time he gave Obama credit for anything. I feel proud.

/first time was the other day when Obama came out in support of gay marriage
 
2012-05-11 06:25:18 PM
Overfiend: President Obama was the Seal who pulled the trigger?

Osama Bin Laden was the terrorist who flew the plane?
 
2012-05-11 06:56:15 PM
HeartBurnKid: Overfiend: President Obama was the Seal who pulled the trigger?

Osama Bin Laden was the terrorist who flew the plane?


Touche!!

I got nothin. You gots me!
 
Displayed 374 of 374 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report