If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Daily Caller)   Obama bravely killed Bin Laden, after bravely setting up a fall guy in case it failed   (thedc.com) divider line 374
    More: Hero, CIA Director Leon Panetta, U.S. Attorney Michael Mukasey, obama, Osama bin Laden, Thomas E. Donilon, Sean Hannity, Fox News, Navy SEAL  
•       •       •

27183 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 May 2012 at 4:13 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



374 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-05-08 05:40:57 PM
Mock26: And how exactly is this unique to President Obama?

Seriously, if you think that President Bush did not have a fall guy for the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq then I have a bridge and a waterfall I would like to sell you.


Bush's fall guy is Obama. Who do you think is getting blamed for the hundreds of billions spent achieving nothing?
 
2012-05-08 05:41:52 PM
Whoa whoa whoa. What's this about Osama being killed? I listen to Rush Limbaugh three hours a day and this is the first I've heard of it. When did this happen? 2003? 2006? Early January 2009?
 
2012-05-08 05:46:56 PM
Wow, Fox News is really desperate.

I love it!
 
2012-05-08 05:49:52 PM
timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?


Clinton, tomahawks, tents.....durrrr
 
2012-05-08 05:50:30 PM
Tigger: If Bush hadn't given up on Bin Laden and he'd actually have been shot on his watch then he would appear on the news wearing two New York Fire Department helmets at the same time in front of a banner of an eagle that shiats bacon onto terrorists while drinking champagne from Bin Laden's hollowed out skull.

This is why I love Fark!
 
2012-05-08 05:51:07 PM
FTA:

""One definition of a great leader," Mukasey added later in the interview, "is somebody who takes less credit than he should and takes more blame than he should. And that's not what we've got now."

Kinda like when Bush stood there and said if you criticize him then you're really criticizing the troops? Kinda like that cowardly act?
 
2012-05-08 05:52:18 PM
SH: Geotpf: Here's the memo:

"Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault. The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am."

First, how is this setting up McRaven as the fall guy? Seems like more a straight go ahead, with an (obvious) note that if anything changes before it happens, tell the big guy. Also, that's a "a highly lawyered memo'? Really? It's farking handwritten, for fark's sake. Looks like more of a note of a phone call than a "memo", anyways.

Agree 100%. No laying blame or anything of the sort there. Republitards strike again.


I don't understand the GOP need to politicize the death of bin Laden. All it does is remind people that Obama got bin Laden. The GOP strategists should be fired.
 
2012-05-08 05:52:22 PM
Cracks me up how Heroic you people think Obama is for doing his job for once.

Imagine how much the rest of america would love him if he did it all the time.
Lead from the front, empower the people who follow you...
A key fact of leadership, he doesnt get. he leads from the back, empowering the government to buy their votes.
Financial slavery, with a sugary coating.

When people discover they can vote themselves money, that is the death of the republic...
Benjamin Franklin. womanizer and slave owner, (like the rest of the world) but still a genius.
 
2012-05-08 05:52:44 PM
SH: Anyone have any idea what percentage of morons in the USA watch FOX News and buy all their BS? I live sorta close to Cincinnati/Indiana/Dayton and all the hillbilly fools around here watch it 24/7 and take it as gospel.

Please tell me the rest of the country isn't this stupid.


You will get your answer on Wednesday, November 7, 2012.
 
2012-05-08 05:54:02 PM
Magnanimous_J: Most of us hated Bush when he was president, but the Tea Baggers just take it to a whole new level.

Yes, there was a lot of hatred for Bush. The difference being that the hatred for Bush was for things that he actually did.
 
2012-05-08 05:54:55 PM
AverageAmericanGuy: Killing Osama sure put a lot of people back to work in a completely recovered economy.

Keep crowing, libs.


Yeah, because overthrowing Hussein was so great for our economy!
 
2012-05-08 05:55:09 PM
HotWingConspiracy: Oh no, I hope the right stops bringing up the fact that President Obama killed bin Laden.

i235.photobucket.com
THIS BEARS REPEATING
 
2012-05-08 05:55:50 PM
Wow. They really can't handle the fact that the black president made the call to get bin laden. Their racism is just disgusting.
 
2012-05-08 05:56:21 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?

Clinton, tomahawks, tents.....durrrr


You wrote "Dems had two cracks at him" in response to "I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11." Hence my question, since prior to 9/11 he wasn't "the man that ordered the attack." He was known to be a dick and an enemy of the U.S. after the embassy bombings, but not at the same level as he was after the towers, so it's not surprising they didn't spend the same level of resources before that they should have after. I write "should have" because Bush apparently gave up on finding him in early 2002.
 
2012-05-08 05:59:41 PM
Geotpf: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?

And the first time they attacked Clinton for "Wagging the Dog" away from the Lewinsky scandal.


And if he had any balls instead of a humidor full of cigars to pork Monica's sweatbox with, he could have done the job then, and we would not be wasting bandwidth now. Obama is better than Clinton because he plainly tells the media to go blow goats if they don't like it. All Clinton cared about was getting his cigars wet and his public opinion polls. It's a tough job. Obama is better at the game than Bubba was. Just saying....not that it matters now except for stupid pol talking points in 2012. I'm conservative, mostly republican and fricking glad SOMEBODY killed the muthaf*cker. Does not mean I will vote for him, just glad he's dead. 3 preznits, one of them had to get it done. Bush missed in Tora Bora, that was close....but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.
 
2012-05-08 06:00:53 PM
FTFA: "One definition of a great leader," Mukasey added later in the interview, "is somebody who takes less credit than he should and takes more blame than he should. And that's not what we've got now."

Mukasey's certainly one to talk, given his background covering Bush's appointees' asses after Attorney General Gonzales had to step aside.
 
2012-05-08 06:01:31 PM
timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?

Clinton, tomahawks, tents.....durrrr

You wrote "Dems had two cracks at him" in response to "I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11." Hence my question, since prior to 9/11 he wasn't "the man that ordered the attack." He was known to be a dick and an enemy of the U.S. after the embassy bombings, but not at the same level as he was after the towers, so it's not surprising they didn't spend the same level of resources before that they should have after. I write "should have" because Bush apparently gave up on finding him in early 2002.


I'm downplaying nothing. HE's DEAD. OBAMA did it. Fine by me.
 
2012-05-08 06:04:34 PM
Many of the same folks that talked about Bush Derangement Syndrome were apparently unaware of the symptoms of Obama Derangement Syndrome.

I get it. Sometimes your candidate loses. The Internet is chock full of derpy articles like this one, from all sides of the political (and psychological) spectrum, so you can sit all day and read how the other guy is an idiot super genius with a secret agenda to destroy America. It's fun, and has been a national pastime for decades. This isn't about finding fault with you.

I'm just saying that if this article/headline combo doesn't set off your derptector, it's time to take a walk outside for a while. Breathe in the fresh air. Don't worry. You can still think Obama sucks the whole time.

If you're still perseverating about the 'fall guy memo' and can't come up with better reasons to hate him by the time you get back... Seek help.
 
2012-05-08 06:06:47 PM
I'm pretty conservative and even I can't read an article that mentions Hannity.
 
2012-05-08 06:06:57 PM
timujin: I write "should have" because Bush apparently gave up on finding him in early 2002.

Yea, right, the public statement was ' I don't know where he was and I don't care'....at the same time, the CIA under Bush directives was directed to up the ante, get more intel and rope him in. And then do it. It took longer than one pol cycle to make it happen. I don't care. HE'S F*CKING DEAD. Give the credit to Hughey Lewis and and the News, I don't CARE.
 
2012-05-08 06:10:21 PM
The whole "Obama did it wrong, because everything he does is wrong" line is getting awfully tired.

If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

I 100% agree that OBL needed to be brought to justice and I have zero sympathy for he and his followers. It is a slippery slope for the USA though. Was the kill order given because it was operationally impossible to capture? Or was it given because it is politically expedient to dump the body in the ocean and not hold a trial?

Perhaps I am totally mistaken here and it was a "capture or kill" order all along.

Let's not kid ourselves though..if it was a kill order of a political figure in the middle of the night then the term is "assassination".
 
2012-05-08 06:10:29 PM
Plenty of reasons to distrust Obammy. Killing Osama is not one of them. He did it. Now, get me the double play and kill Al Zwahiri and I would really be pleased. Still don't really care who does it or gets the credit. I just want them DEAD.
 
2012-05-08 06:10:56 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Dems had two cracks at him

After 9/11?

Clinton, tomahawks, tents.....durrrr

You wrote "Dems had two cracks at him" in response to "I actually didn't think they would downplay the death of the man that ordered the attack on 9/11." Hence my question, since prior to 9/11 he wasn't "the man that ordered the attack." He was known to be a dick and an enemy of the U.S. after the embassy bombings, but not at the same level as he was after the towers, so it's not surprising they didn't spend the same level of resources before that they should have after. I write "should have" because Bush apparently gave up on finding him in early 2002.

I'm downplaying nothing. HE's DEAD. OBAMA did it. Fine by me.


I don't think I said you were downplaying anything. I only asked because you were responding to "why are the Republicans talking about this?" with "the Dems could have done it years ago." You've gone on to write a whole screed about Clinton and his cigars. I'm still not sure why you're bringing that up, it has nothing to do with the comment you responded to, nor to the thread as a whole.

"Why are the Republicans reminding people Obama ordered the strike on OBL?"
"Clinton didn't kill him. Twice."
"LOLWUT?"
 
2012-05-08 06:12:48 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: timujin: I write "should have" because Bush apparently gave up on finding him in early 2002.

Yea, right, the public statement was ' I don't know where he was and I don't care'....at the same time, the CIA under Bush directives was directed to up the ante, get more intel and rope him in. And then do it. It took longer than one pol cycle to make it happen. I don't care. HE'S F*CKING DEAD. Give the credit to Hughey Lewis and and the News, I don't CARE.


Was that what was going on? I took Bush's word at face value, he seemed to be much more concerned about Iraq and not really worried any more about bin Laden. Do you know if the CIA actually did anything?
 
2012-05-08 06:14:26 PM
Two_Noodles: If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

He was a valid military target under the 9/11 AUMF. We no more needed to go out of our way to capture him than we do any other valid military target.
 
2012-05-08 06:15:07 PM
Two_Noodles: The whole "Obama did it wrong, because everything he does is wrong" line is getting awfully tired.

If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

I 100% agree that OBL needed to be brought to justice and I have zero sympathy for he and his followers. It is a slippery slope for the USA though. Was the kill order given because it was operationally impossible to capture? Or was it given because it is politically expedient to dump the body in the ocean and not hold a trial?

Perhaps I am totally mistaken here and it was a "capture or kill" order all along.

Let's not kid ourselves though..if it was a kill order of a political figure in the middle of the night then the term is "assassination".


You cannot assassinate a terrorist. The term assassination is correctly applied to recognized leaders of duly recognized countries. And that does not apply. It was a seek and destroy mission of a duly noted terrorist/'criminal/enemy of the state, without a flag or an embassy. We 'assassinated' no one. We took out the garbage.
 
2012-05-08 06:18:08 PM
Came for the "Brave Sir Robin" reference. Leaving somewhat disappointed.
 
2012-05-08 06:19:57 PM
Asked by Hannity if the memo "was designed to protect the president politically," Mukasey suggested that "there's going to be more that comes tumbling out about that escapade. But so far, that memo is enough."


Translation: This is all I got for now, but when I try to find away to spin some other stuff I will get back to you.
 
2012-05-08 06:20:03 PM
Somacandra: bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

Words cannot express how much awesome this shop has.


Hillary as Wonder Woman makes me lose all my horny though.
 
2012-05-08 06:23:41 PM
Of course it would never be Obama's fault. Nothing ever is.
 
2012-05-08 06:23:42 PM
timujin: I took Bush's word at face value,

As did everyone else. Politics is not what you should consider the breeding ground for facts or truth. What happens daily in that circle once you are the president is beyond any normal ring of information. Believe what you will.
 
2012-05-08 06:25:34 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: Bush missed in Tora Bora, that was close....but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

Bush didn't "miss" at Tora Bora. He "didn't even take a swing" at Tora Bora. That is what makes his ass (and those that apologize for him) such weak sauce.

Bubba Clinton *missed* and all clowns like you did was scream "Wag the dog!!!!!lolz!111" at the top of your lungs.
 
2012-05-08 06:26:25 PM
sprawl15: Two_Noodles: If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

He was a valid military target under the 9/11 AUMF. We no more needed to go out of our way to capture him than we do any other valid military target.


So, it's covered under the "enemy we are at war with" exclusion? Got it.
The Guantanamo precedent makes me twitchy - I think those guys should have gone to court in DC because it sets a much better example for the rest of the world.
 
2012-05-08 06:26:26 PM
Mitch Taylor's Bro: Somacandra: bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

Words cannot express how much awesome this shop has.

Hillary as Wonder Woman makes me lose all my horny though.


It's really odd, but as a conservative, I think the job she has done as Sec of State has been admirable. Even her Preznit hates her and she has done the duty, flown the miles and worked the rooms. Would she have been a better President? I don't really know.
 
2012-05-08 06:29:06 PM
Two_Noodles:

If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.


Osama was given full due process. The process to which he was due is clearly defined under the AUMF, authorized by the United States Congress, and signed into law by President of the United States George W. Bush.

I do not think those words mean what you think they mean.
 
2012-05-08 06:30:36 PM
Two_Noodles: sprawl15: Two_Noodles: If Obama did it wrong, it is because he gave a "kill" order instead of "capture". Essentially this makes it a political assassination. OBL was the leader of a political movement (a violent, marginalized and illegitimate movement). He was killed in the middle of the night and without due process.

He was a valid military target under the 9/11 AUMF. We no more needed to go out of our way to capture him than we do any other valid military target.

So, it's covered under the "enemy we are at war with" exclusion? Got it.


It's not an exclusion. It is a very specific inclusion. The list of people the Congress says the President can use military force against is very well defined, and Osama bin Laden was on it.
 
2012-05-08 06:33:11 PM
This is the biggest farking lie I've ever seen the right wing try to push. I was outraged last week when i heard some right -wing fringe ranter try to push it, but I had no idea it was some kind of coordinated campaign until now.

And here's the important thing: Mukaskey and anyone else who claims this interpretation of the memo KNOW they are lying because the memo says THE EXACT OPPOSITE of that they are claiming and Mukaskey especially ,who has seen such memos before KNOWS it

Admiral McRaven is the commander of JSOC, so OF COURSE he had operational command of the mission that would be like Roosevelt putting Eisenhower in charge of D-Day, in other words exactly what you'd expect.

By putting in the line about briefing the president about additional risks Obama was putting the mission and its risks on HIS shoulders, telling McRaven he could come back to him and double-check if things appeared worse than influentially briefed, not making McR make that call in a vacuum.

And you know WHY the right s do desperate to attack this memo? Because it proves their LAST line of attack, that somehow the Navy SEALS did this all on their own in defiance of Obama's orders, to be the utter bullshiat it always was.
 
2012-05-08 06:33:39 PM
The Rove strategy of taking your enemy's greatest strength and making it their weakness isn't working this time. It has been reported (since days after the raid) that operational control was with Admiral McRaven. Obama took credit for authorizing the raid, which the memo makes clear he did (despite GOP claims last week that it was a coup by Panetta and Hillary). It just seems like Republicans keep reminding us that Bush hesitated at Tora Bora, Romney, McCain, and the rest of the GOP called Obama "naive" when he said that if he had information on Bin Laden's whereabouts and Pakistan either could not or would not act, he would do so unilaterally. In short, this isn't ever going to be a winning issue for them, no matter how much CYA Obama was doing, the reality is that Osama Bin Laden is very much dead now, whereas if I believe McCain and Romney, they would likely have tipped our hand to Pakistan and the ISI would have once again helped Bin Laden escape.

McCain, Clinton rag him for saying he would do just what he did.
 
2012-05-08 06:33:54 PM
Brave, brave, brave, brave Obama!

pinktape.co.uk


/is that David Duchovny playing the minstrel?
 
2012-05-08 06:34:28 PM
Rent Party: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Bush missed in Tora Bora, that was close....but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

Bush didn't "miss" at Tora Bora. He "didn't even take a swing" at Tora Bora. That is what makes his ass (and those that apologize for him) such weak sauce.

Bubba Clinton *missed* and all clowns like you did was scream "Wag the dog!!!!!lolz!111" at the top of your lungs.


How little you know about the Tora Bora campaign......didn't take a swing? jeezus...what a stupid thing to say.

The really odd part is about public perception being driven by media whores. At the time, I remember thinking, and still to this day, I couldn't care less if Bill Clinton was f*cking goats and little choir boys. I just wanted him to get the job done. We knew about AQ back then, and Bubba flinched/missed because he could not handle the heat in the kitchen.. These facts are irrefutable. But Bush.....
 
2012-05-08 06:36:31 PM
I am starting to see an advantage to TotalFark in this thread.

Pre-Green: Some discourse, but mostly rational with many of the posters actually reading the article.

Post-Green: DERP!!!
 
2012-05-08 06:36:56 PM
Magorn: This is the biggest farking lie I've ever seen the right wing try to push. I was outraged last week when i heard some right -wing fringe ranter try to push it, but I had no idea it was some kind of coordinated campaign until now.

If you think that was the biggest lie, try this one from a few days after Osama was killed.
 
2012-05-08 06:38:19 PM
cameroncrazy1984: jbc: Did EnviroDud, best known around here for giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda, just admit in this thread that Obama was able to "get it right"?

Apparently he takes issue with the SEALs' training methods, though. Maybe he can tell one of them directly that ten months is too long.


I'd pay to how they'd respond to his derp.
 
2012-05-08 06:39:21 PM
Well at least Obama learned ONE thing from Jimmy Carter.
 
2012-05-08 06:39:21 PM
Surool: Why are you Republicans so butthurt that Osama is dead? You set him up as the world's most evil super villain from 2001-2008. Shouldn't you be happy that somebody took him out after Bush publicly stated that he was no longer concerned about Bin Laden's whereabouts?

We got him dudes... on to the next threat finally.



Actually, OBL was not that important as of about 2006.

Link
 
2012-05-08 06:40:33 PM
Lt. Cheese Weasel: Rent Party: Lt. Cheese Weasel: Bush missed in Tora Bora, that was close....but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

Bush didn't "miss" at Tora Bora. He "didn't even take a swing" at Tora Bora. That is what makes his ass (and those that apologize for him) such weak sauce.

Bubba Clinton *missed* and all clowns like you did was scream "Wag the dog!!!!!lolz!111" at the top of your lungs.

How little you know about the Tora Bora campaign......didn't take a swing? jeezus...what a stupid thing to say.


I know that the CIA operative specifically tasked with catching bin Laden during the battle of Tora Bora states that he and his team knew *exactly* where bin Laden was, asked for additional troop support to get him, and was denied. He even went so far as to write a book about it.

In other words, Bush didn't even take a swing.

But I'm sure your brother-in-law's cousin was a Marine Core soldier and knows better, right?
 
2012-05-08 06:40:48 PM
mrlewish: So when is Former U.S. Attorney Michael Mukasey going to be arrested for revealing Top Secret information?

That would mean the administration would have to admit (or take actions that the public might interpret as an admission) that Mukasey's allegations have truth to them.

People capable of logical thought could be persuaded simply by pointing out that Mukasey hasn't offered any proof that such a memo ever existed, nor was he at the time in a position where he would have had access to any memos drafted but not released by Leon Panetta. The herpers are going to believe this derp no matter what.
 
2012-05-08 06:41:54 PM
bim1154: [i106.photobucket.com image 640x422]

Why is Spawn there?
 
2012-05-08 06:42:39 PM
A memo like this would be SOP for any President, regardless of the letter denoting their political affiliation that precedes him (or her). Google "Operation Eagle Claw" for reasons why.

The thing that upsets people that aren't blinded by the fact that Obama is a dem, or black, or a "sekrit muslim" is the credit he took for it. This document is not damning, nor should it be surprising to anyone who knows anything about the CYA nature of politics, but it does fly in the face of the credit taken after it was successful.
 
2012-05-08 06:47:35 PM
I'm not friend of Obama, but then again, I don't like 90% of the presidents I've lived to see. But there hasn't been a president that hasn't done the same thing. Republican or Democrat
 
Displayed 50 of 374 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report