I don't always vote Republican, but when I do...

Woo hoo! Let the insanity commence! I voted for Falk just before 8 this morning. Was the 60th voter in my polling location.

Here's hopin for Barrett.

I voted in N.C. today.

I voted against that stupid amendment.

I can't decide if Scott Walker's head is misshapen, his haircut's lopsided, or his eyes are at different heights. Anyway, he's unpleasant to look at. Or talk to. Or be around. That's my point.

.fark that guy.

bdub77: Bf+: I don't always vote Republican, but when I do...

You have a little horse semen dribbling out of your mouth.

Fap?

bdub77: Bf+: I don't always vote Republican, but when I do...

You have a little horse semen dribbling out of your mouth.

Fuggin Bizzy: I can't decide if Scott Walker's head is misshapen, his haircut's lopsided, or his eyes are at different heights. Anyway, he's unpleasant to look at. Or talk to. Or be around. That's my point.

.fark that guy.

Poster child for Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.

I'm going to the polls after work today. Still not sure whether to vote for Falk or Barrett and I haven't been able to find a lot of info on their policy positions. Can anyone point me to a decent breakdown?

It looks like organized labor is heading for a beatdown. Today and in June.

I want it so close that there is a recount and court battles to ensue. Fark Walker and Fark Wisconsin....they deserve what they asked for.

(popcorn.gif)

Attention Wisconsin Farkers!

In case you are undecided about getting out to vote today I urge you to remember: This man is as dumb as he looks.

Fuggin Bizzy: I can't decide if Scott Walker's head is misshapen, his haircut's lopsided, or his eyes are at different heights. Anyway, he's unpleasant to look at. Or talk to. Or be around. That's my point.

.fark that guy.

chionophile: I'm going to the polls after work today. Still not sure whether to vote for Falk or Barrett and I haven't been able to find a lot of info on their policy positions. Can anyone point me to a decent breakdown?

This one's not too bad, but I wish it was more detailed. The Unions were a bit quick to endorse Falk, and most (including Walker's advertisers, apparently) seem to think that Barret has the better chance against Walker. I'm not sure it really matters-- Walker is getting voted out.

Another to consider the Republican challenger in the primary, Arthur Kohl-Riggs

I've decided to vote for walkers opponent. But just as a fark you to walker before I vote for the dem in the election (most likley barrett)

Also:

Philip Francis Queeg: Attention Wisconsin Farkers!

In case you are undecided about getting out to vote today I urge you to remember: This man is as dumb as he looks.

[static6.businessinsider.com image 400x300]


Something about that guy doesn't seem... "on the level."

This is tonight?

Aw...crap. I must have forgot to put it on my calendar.

I'm going to need a bottle of bourbon....the cheap stuff...I don't want to break into something in a glass bottle until November, some Doritos...the big bag....Red Bull....a case of the stuff....a NERF gun and plenty of ammo....my fuzzy slippers, the long leash so the dog can walk himself without me being there and some Advil for the next morning.

I'm voting Barrett later today.

If the actual recall election is solely about the issue of unions, Walker has a much better chance of winning. Falk has made this solely about unions.

dougermouse: TIme for the guaranteed to be wrong predictions! 1) Walker stays in office 2) NC passes the amendment 3) Luger is out in Indiana.

Derp wins today. When 25% of your population (the authoritarians) will ALWAYS vote one direction and votes in higher rates than the normal people, Derp ALWAYS starts with a lead. Split the rest 60/40 and it's still a derp win.

I hope not, but in the latest polls it's expected to pass.

WhoIsWillo: Other races to watch today are obviously the gay marriage amendment in North Carolina and the Republican Senate primary in Indiana, where the last remaining fragment of respectability of the Republican Party may come to a thundering halt.

Are they really going to throw out an incumbent power player because he knows how to get things done? Are Republicans really going to let perfect be the enemy of good?

I'm gonna laugh if the seat goes blue in November.

Bf+: I don't always vote Republican, but when I do...

Arthur Kohl-Riggs winning the Republican primary against Walker has about as much chance of working as Ron Paul winning in a surprise floor fight at the Republican convention. If your ok with Barrett running as the Democrat against Walker, than fine. But Falk needs all the votes she can get.

Barrett is only better than Scott Walker because he's not Scott Walker.

meat0918: Are they really going to throw out an incumbent power player because he knows how to get things done? Are Republicans really going to let perfect be the enemy of good?

Yes. In a heartbeat. That's been the Tea Party's entire rationale at the voting booth. They don't want the furthest-right person who can win. They want the furthest-right person period.

BigBooper: Bf+: I don't always vote Republican, but when I do...

Arthur Kohl-Riggs winning the Republican primary against Walker has about as much chance of working as Ron Paul winning in a surprise floor fight at the Republican convention. If your ok with Barrett running as the Democrat against Walker, than fine. But Falk needs all the votes she can get.

Barrett is only better than Scott Walker because he's not Scott Walker.


I'm really split between Falk and Barrett. Frankly, I wish we had better options.
I slightly prefer Falk, but I think Barrett would do slightly better against Walker.
I'm not sure it really matters who you run against Walker. Like you say... they're both not Walker.

madtowner11: I'm voting Barrett later today.

If the actual recall election is solely about the issue of unions, Walker has a much better chance of winning. Falk has made this solely about unions.

Barrett is the moderate-Milquetoast candidate that's already lost to Walker. I for one want a real debate with candidates that have real differences. Not a pair of politicians that are both trying not to offend anyone.

bdub77: Bf+: I don't always vote Republican, but when I do...

You have a little horse semen dribbling out of your mouth.

BigBooper: Let the insanity commence!

It commenced the day the neo-Bircher Koch-heads got Walker's corporate meat puppet ass elected and it won't stop till he and their undue influence are gone.

I already have you farkied as an "anti-union pro-Walker troll" so imagine my surprise in finding you ITT already.

quatchi: BigBooper: Let the insanity commence!

It commenced the day the neo-Bircher Koch-heads got Walker's corporate meat puppet ass elected and it won't stop till he and their undue influence are gone.

I already have you farkied as an "anti-union pro-Walker troll" so imagine my surprise in finding you ITT already.

Hmm, it's so easy to categorize someone wrongly. Read my posts, is anything I posted wrong? Do you really believe that Mr. Bland has a better chance against Walker than Falk?

I'm in Wisconsin, so all this fascinates me, and I'm in every Wisconsin thread.

I'm voting Doug La Follette. Most of the democrats share major positions, so hse's on par with the rest for worker's and women's rights. He's also a huge LGBT ally, favors prison and drug reform, and supports shutting down conversion therapy centers.

Citrate1007: I want it so close that there is a recount and court battles to ensue. Fark Walker and Fark Wisconsin....they deserve what they asked for.

If you hate Walker, why do you want it close? I want to see a breezy, unambiguous recall. And with a number of signatures on the recall petition approaching the number of people who voted for him, that sounds doable.

bdub77: Bf+: bdub77: Bf+: I don't always vote Republican, but when I do...

You have a little horse semen dribbling out of your mouth.

[cdn.shopify.com image 500x356]

Are you the cat in this photograph?


I'm confused.
You're account creation date is a pretty old to be a troll, and it's pretty early to be that drunk...
Maybe I'm missing a reference. What gives?

BigBooper: quatchi: BigBooper: Let the insanity commence!

It commenced the day the neo-Bircher Koch-heads got Walker's corporate meat puppet ass elected and it won't stop till he and their undue influence are gone.

I already have you farkied as an "anti-union pro-Walker troll" so imagine my surprise in finding you ITT already.

Hmm, it's so easy to categorize someone wrongly. Read my posts, is anything I posted wrong? Do you really believe that Mr. Bland has a better chance against Walker than Falk?

I'm in Wisconsin, so all this fascinates me, and I'm in every Wisconsin thread.

Polling seems to say yes. (New window, Politico)

I early voted a couple of weeks ago. If I had to predict anything, I'd say that Barrett will lose to Walker by a razor thin margin in the general, and Mahlon Mitchell will beat Kleefisch by a similar razor thin margin for Lt. Gov. Yes, they are technically up for separate recalls, and lulz will be had.

Out of the state senate recalls, Van Wanggard down in Racine will lose, flipping the senate to Democratic control, and the other R's will hold on. So Walker winning won't mean much anyway.

The Amendment in NC should never have been on the ballot in the first place. Putting constitutional amendments on primary ballots, which typically have sub-20% turnout, should be illegal. It was obviously done to give it the best chance of passing since it is just a GOP primary year, which until last month would have guaranteed higher turnout with the GOP while there was no incentive for Dems to vote.

It's the underhandedness one would expect from NC politics. The same group voted on a bill when 2 Democrats were out of the country on business and one was in the hospital after being hit by a drunk driver.

Will unions continue to spend tens of millions of dollars to throw a temper tantrum aimed at protecting the corrupt circle of pay/benefits being given to them by Democrats in exchange for votes/campaign contributions?

Of course they will.

And next week we will see OWS lamenting income inequality, or student loans, or half a dozen other things that their fellow leftist friends in unions could be spending that money on instead of recalling a successful governor who dared to stand up even slightly to the public sector unions on behalf of tax payers.

Elections have consequences until liberals lose. Then its time for recalls and temper tantrums.

Falcc: I'm voting Doug La Follette. Most of the democrats share major positions, so hse's on par with the rest for worker's and women's rights. He's also a huge LGBT ally, favors prison and drug reform, and supports shutting down conversion therapy centers.

Yeah I think I am going to vote for him as well. Everyone is telling me to vote for Barrett because he has the best shot a winning. I am not so sure about that he didn't win last year against him, so I am not sure about now. I was also thinking Falk, because she seems like she won't take shiat from no one. Plus she seems to actually give a shiat about people. However seeing La Follette talk he knows his shiat, and has a mechanical cow that amuses me.