Not all that unlikely given that he was in an open marriage for almost thirty years.

Joe Kernan almost sucks as bad as Larry Kudlow. They're two examples of why CNBC is too stupid to watch.

thomps: Serious Black: Not all that unlikely given that he was in an open marriage for almost thirty years.

that's not really a fair statement - they were divorced in every way except legally for almost thirty years. from all i've heard, he's been happily not-married to that other broad for almost as long.

The three of them signed their Christmas cards together. There are even suggestions that she was the sole beneficiary of his estate until she died. By all accounts, all three were happy with the arrangement. And he is now married to the other woman, Astrid Menks.

Was that after the Jerk Store called?

badaboom. Pretty quick wit.

I bet he also said that to Bill Gates in the thread below this. He says it to everyone.

Guffaws all around.

Oh, FARK YOU businessinsider.

"Hurm. Page isn't loading. Maybe it's getting caught by NoScript."

*temporarily unblocks businessinsider*

"Huh. Still not loading. Maybe they use an external --"

*counts 22 other sites in use by businessinsider*

"HOLY shiatSTAIN"

/oddly, when afterward blocking bi again, the page loaded. still: fu bi

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Was that after the Jerk Store called?

His wife's in a coma.

ArcadianRefugee: Oh, FARK YOU businessinsider.

"Hurm. Page isn't loading. Maybe it's getting caught by NoScript."

*temporarily unblocks businessinsider*

"Huh. Still not loading. Maybe they use an external --"

*counts 22 other sites in use by businessinsider*

"HOLY shiatSTAIN"

/oddly, when afterward blocking bi again, the page loaded. still: fu bi

yep. did the same thing. id like to see the video, but fark that page.

ArcadianRefugee: Oh, FARK YOU businessinsider.

"Hurm. Page isn't loading. Maybe it's getting caught by NoScript."

*temporarily unblocks businessinsider*

"Huh. Still not loading. Maybe they use an external --"

*counts 22 other sites in use by businessinsider*

"HOLY shiatSTAIN"

/oddly, when afterward blocking bi again, the page loaded. still: fu bi



What in the actual god damned fark is this shiat?

I remember when CNBC was about the financial industry not a bunch of right wing partisan idiots.

It's so embarrassing when Buffet gets on and all that idiot does is try to embarrass Buffet with shiat like this and strawman arguments.

Are we still making news websites that only work with one browser? Are we really still doing this shiat? Is this still 1993/Mosaic/Netscape/Archie time?

Lucky LaRue: I dislike Joe Kernan, so this made me laugh.

Yeah Joe Kernan, is an ass. When FOX created their own financial channel CNBC became all right wing partisan. It's pretty embarrassing ho bad it got.

Kudlow is horrible.

thomps: DjangoStonereaver: This is why he's a billionaire and we're not.

bullsh*t. i f*ck people's wives all the time and i'm not even a millionaire.

Are you a spy?

Rapmaster2000: Joe Kernan almost sucks as bad as Larry Kudlow. They're two examples of why CNBC is too stupid to watch.

THIS!

It's so funny when they run up against people like Buffet they are so upset at people like him because it shows that their political/economic dogma is wrong that it makes them so mad.

Is that why the ladies call him "all you can eat" buffet?

Serious Black: And he is now married to the other woman, Astrid Menks.

And I'll bed she shags like a ...
well...
u know.

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Was that after the Jerk Store called?



Approves! Nice one.

Lost Thought 00: BeesNuts: What in the actual god damned fark is this shiat?

Synergy

I think it might just be *optically* synergistic. They'll harmonize the appiverse eventually and unlock the potential of crowdsourced web 2.0 user content driven customer ownership. Then and ONLY then will we be able to invoke that pipe dream of "synergy".

/good answer btw.

Corvus: Rapmaster2000: Joe Kernan almost sucks as bad as Larry Kudlow. They're two examples of why CNBC is too stupid to watch.

THIS!

It's so funny when they run up against people like Buffet they are so upset at people like him because it shows that their political/economic dogma is wrong that it makes them so mad.

I'm not annoyed so much by the dogma than I am by the idea that CNBC decided to reduce things like David Faber and actual math and replace it with tits and loudmouths. CNBC wanted to compete with FBN by getting louder and dumber.

Telling me you watch CNBC is telling me you probably make bad investments.

Kernan is an ass. He does this everytime Buffet is on. You have the most successful investor in US history and Kernan sits around trying to insult him or asks him stupid tea bagger questions. It's embarrassing.

Rapmaster2000: I'm not annoyed so much by the dogma than I am by the idea that CNBC decided to reduce things like David Faber and actual math and replace it with tits and loudmouths. CNBC wanted to compete with FBN by getting louder and dumber.

Telling me you watch CNBC is telling me you probably make bad investments.

A) that's pretty much my point
B) nope don't watch it anymore because it has no data or real information anymore. It's all political BS.

Yeah Faber is good. But he is too liberal i.e. he looks into facts, for CNBC anymore.

Maybe Mr. Buffet should pay the 1 BILLION in back taxes he still owes the IRS.

Instead of saying rich people should pay their fare share.

He is such a piece of trash.

Rapmaster2000: Joe Kernan almost sucks as bad as Larry Kudlow. They're two examples of why CNBC is too stupid to watch.

I've heard some pretty stupid shiat come outta Maddow's mouth, when her smug grin wasn't too tight to keep the words from coming out.

Should Have Said:

It's certainly been tough when I call your house Andrew, your home phone is often busy.
I guess that my kids have grown up into teenagers and are always on it.

Serious Black: Not all that unlikely given that he was in an open marriage for almost thirty years.

When you have as much money as Buffet, a marriage is going to be as open as you want it to be. If she doesn't like it, well... there's the door. Questions?

JohnKimble63: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Was that after the Jerk Store called?

[blogs.dallasobserver.com image 475x416]

Approves! Nice one.

His wife is in a coma...

TIKIMAN87: Maybe Mr. Buffet should pay the 1 BILLION in back taxes he still owes the IRS.

Instead of saying rich people should pay their fare share.

He is such a piece of trash.

You sound poor.

TIKIMAN87: Maybe Mr. Buffet should pay the 1 BILLION in back taxes he still owes the IRS


Maybe you should Google shiat like that before you post it and look like a window-licking retard...

TIKIMAN87: Maybe Mr. Buffet should pay the 1 BILLION in back taxes he still owes the IRS.

Instead of saying rich people should pay their fare share.

He is such a piece of trash.

This.

Rapmaster2000: Corvus: Rapmaster2000: Joe Kernan almost sucks as bad as Larry Kudlow. They're two examples of why CNBC is too stupid to watch.

THIS!

It's so funny when they run up against people like Buffet they are so upset at people like him because it shows that their political/economic dogma is wrong that it makes them so mad.

I'm not annoyed so much by the dogma than I am by the idea that CNBC decided to reduce things like David Faber and actual math and replace it with tits and loudmouths. CNBC wanted to compete with FBN by getting louder and dumber.

Telling me you watch CNBC is telling me you probably make bad investments.

I prefer Bloomberg

mmm Betty Liu

Now I know what you're thinking... "But I don't get Bloomberg! I'll miss seeing her every morning!"

Free Bloomberg Stream

ArcadianRefugee: Oh, FARK YOU businessinsider.

"Hurm. Page isn't loading. Maybe it's getting caught by NoScript."

*temporarily unblocks businessinsider*

"Huh. Still not loading. Maybe they use an external --"

*counts 22 other sites in use by businessinsider*

"HOLY shiatSTAIN"

/oddly, when afterward blocking bi again, the page loaded. still: fu bi

You and other techno morons missed the AD that force played before the page would load. Turn off adblock and try again, maybe you'll notice the "continue to business insider" button with convenient timer attached.

TIKIMAN87: Maybe Mr. Buffet should pay the 1 BILLION in back taxes he still owes the IRS.

Instead of saying rich people should pay their fare share.

He is such a piece of trash.

You mean the possible 1 billion that Berkshire Hathaway is currently fighting with the IRS about? Is that the money you speak of?
Because that 1 billion number came from public available documents analyzed by people who are not part of the negotiations there. And I have a sneaking suspicion that if you had the cadre of lawyers and money to back the process you'd probably fight the IRS over your taxes too if you thought you were being taxed unfairly.

/feeding the trolls
//stoking the fire
///old man showed the CNBC ass who's boss

Kahabut: You and other techno morons missed the AD that force played before the page would load. Turn off adblock and try again, maybe you'll notice the "continue to business insider" button with convenient timer attached.

Or we could just not give a ridiculously intrusive website our page clicks.

DjangoStonereaver: This is why he's a billionaire and we're not.


So why has the S&P500 (an index fund of all things) beaten Berkshire three years in a row?

Kahabut: ArcadianRefugee: Oh, FARK YOU businessinsider.

"Hurm. Page isn't loading. Maybe it's getting caught by NoScript."

*temporarily unblocks businessinsider*

"Huh. Still not loading. Maybe they use an external --"

*counts 22 other sites in use by businessinsider*

"HOLY shiatSTAIN"

/oddly, when afterward blocking bi again, the page loaded. still: fu bi

You and other techno morons missed the AD that force played before the page would load. Turn off adblock and try again, maybe you'll notice the "continue to business insider" button with convenient timer attached.

Meanwhile, you completely missed the point.

/ clue: it had nothing to do with anything technical

A Day Older than Yesterday: DjangoStonereaver: This is why he's a billionaire and we're not.


So why has the S&P500 (an index fund of all things) beaten Berkshire three years in a row?

Are you just arbitrarily picking the last three years? How about from inception? Bit of a different story...