Lionel Mandrake: AdolfOliverPanties: So under Obama, private sector jobs have gone up very dramatically while he has shrunk government, kept Gitmo open, killed bin Laden, cut taxes. been a great friend of Wall Street and has deported more illegal immigrants than the previous president.

Why exactly do the Republicans hate this guy?

Because he's way better than they are at doing what they say they're good at?

Oh, and he's black

Right on both counts... I would also add to that list, "they're a bunch a farking power hungry idiots".

AdolfOliverPanties: So under Obama, private sector jobs have gone up very dramatically while he has shrunk government, kept Gitmo open, killed bin Laden, cut taxes. been a great friend of Wall Street and has deported more illegal immigrants than the previous president.

Why exactly do the Republicans hate this guy?

If Obama had an "R" after his name Fox News would host a nightly Q&A with him featuring RNC interns asking him why he is so amazing and what caliber bullet he shot Bin Laden in the face with, and then Hannity would get on his knees and perform fellatio until his face was covered in Obama's All-American Patriot man juice.

Poison Appleseeds: AdolfOliverPanties: So under Obama, private sector jobs have gone up very dramatically while he has shrunk government, kept Gitmo open, killed bin Laden, cut taxes. been a great friend of Wall Street and has deported more illegal immigrants than the previous president.

Why exactly do the Republicans hate this guy?

If Obama had an "R" after his name Fox News would host a nightly Q&A with him featuring RNC interns asking him why he is so amazing and what caliber bullet he shot Bin Laden in the face with, and then Hannity would get on his knees and perform fellatio until his face was covered in Obama's All-American Patriot man juice.

I disagree. That is completely wrong.

It would be Hannity and either Coulter or Malkin doing the fellatio.

Poison Appleseeds: AdolfOliverPanties: So under Obama, private sector jobs have gone up very dramatically while he has shrunk government, kept Gitmo open, killed bin Laden, cut taxes. been a great friend of Wall Street and has deported more illegal immigrants than the previous president.

Why exactly do the Republicans hate this guy?

If Obama had an "R" after his name Fox News would host a nightly Q&A with him featuring RNC interns asking him why he is so amazing and what caliber bullet he shot Bin Laden in the face with, and then Hannity would get on his knees and perform fellatio until his face was covered in Obama's All-American Patriot man juice.

Exactly. They would also have been fellating zombie Clinton for years.

/Oh, he isn't dead...

El Pachuco: Poison Appleseeds: AdolfOliverPanties: So under Obama, private sector jobs have gone up very dramatically while he has shrunk government, kept Gitmo open, killed bin Laden, cut taxes. been a great friend of Wall Street and has deported more illegal immigrants than the previous president.

Why exactly do the Republicans hate this guy?

If Obama had an "R" after his name Fox News would host a nightly Q&A with him featuring RNC interns asking him why he is so amazing and what caliber bullet he shot Bin Laden in the face with, and then Hannity would get on his knees and perform fellatio until his face was covered in Obama's All-American Patriot man juice.

I disagree. That is completely wrong.

It would be Hannity and either Coulter or Malkin doing the fellatio.

I would pay to watch Malkin take the man-juice. Coulter, I am afraid, would be providing the man-juice.

The relative loss of public sector jobs, as Lionel Mandrake points out, means that the unions that support Obama lost members.

This very bad news for Obama....very very bad

How is it that America does not realize that we are watching the absolute Greatest Economic Recovery in Recorded World History?!?! It's like the Greatest Mystery Ever!!!

gtomako: How is it that America does not realize that we are watching the absolute Greatest Economic Recovery in Recorded World History?!?! It's like the Greatest Mystery Ever!!!

[4.bp.blogspot.com image 353x500]

Pathetic.

Someone fix the headline. (not mine)

I knew all the public sector jobs couldn't have come back, because all the Republican governors wouldn't allow it in their states.

Wow. The spinderpsters are working triple OT.

Now, back in the real world, the jobs numbers came out, it looks like we're headed for a double dip, the stock market tanked on anemic growth and oil prices dropped sharply in anticipation that it won't be needed because there will be no increase in shipping demand.

In a few weeks, gas prices will fall because of this and I'm sure the spinsters won't blame the crappy economic outlook but probably say it's the new oversight on speculation (even though selling is still speculation).

Alphax: Someone fix the headline. (not mine)

I knew all the public sector jobs couldn't have come back, because all the Republican governors wouldn't allow it in their states.

As a Wisconsinite not even the private sector jobs are coming back.

/And I am out of a job in a month.
//Thanks Scooter, you cocksucker.

Chimperror2: Wow. The spinderpsters are working triple OT.

Now, back in the real world, the jobs numbers came out, it looks like we're headed for a double dip, the stock market tanked on anemic growth and oil prices dropped sharply in anticipation that it won't be needed because there will be no increase in shipping demand.

In a few weeks, gas prices will fall because of this and I'm sure the spinsters won't blame the crappy economic outlook but probably say it's the new oversight on speculation (even though selling is still speculation).

You have no clue. You apparently don't live a real life. You just follow the job numbers because you want to see them suck because it will help your side. fark you.

Sabyen91: Alphax: Someone fix the headline. (not mine)

I knew all the public sector jobs couldn't have come back, because all the Republican governors wouldn't allow it in their states.

As a Wisconsinite not even the private sector jobs are coming back.

/And I am out of a job in a month.
//Thanks Scooter, you cocksucker.

Sorry to hear that.

/working night 6 of 7 myself, to my annoyance, but I sure wouldn't want to be looking for work again. Did far too much of that in the middle of the last decade.

Alphax: Sabyen91: Alphax: Someone fix the headline. (not mine)

I knew all the public sector jobs couldn't have come back, because all the Republican governors wouldn't allow it in their states.

As a Wisconsinite not even the private sector jobs are coming back.

/And I am out of a job in a month.
//Thanks Scooter, you cocksucker.

Sorry to hear that.

/working night 6 of 7 myself, to my annoyance, but I sure wouldn't want to be looking for work again. Did far too much of that in the middle of the last decade.

It is tough. I have done a spectacular job at my current job. Everybody at my location wants to hire me. Corporate, in Pittsburgh, PA, doesn't like paying for indirect costs. Large corporations are more dysfunctional than government agencies.

Chimperror2: Wow. The spinderpsters are working triple OT.

Now, back in the real world, the jobs numbers came out, it looks like we're headed for a double dip, the stock market tanked on anemic growth and oil prices dropped sharply in anticipation that it won't be needed because there will be no increase in shipping demand.

In a few weeks, gas prices will fall because of this and I'm sure the spinsters won't blame the crappy economic outlook but probably say it's the new oversight on speculation (even though selling is still speculation).

The private sector added 130K jobs in March while March and February were adjusted up. You'll not find a Democrat on the planet who claims this growth rate is enough, but it's still growth. And if you're going to beat the drum that this is the President's fault, name one jobs bill the Republican House has passed that the President has refused to sign.

Stile4aly: Chimperror2: Wow. The spinderpsters are working triple OT.

Now, back in the real world, the jobs numbers came out, it looks like we're headed for a double dip, the stock market tanked on anemic growth and oil prices dropped sharply in anticipation that it won't be needed because there will be no increase in shipping demand.

In a few weeks, gas prices will fall because of this and I'm sure the spinsters won't blame the crappy economic outlook but probably say it's the new oversight on speculation (even though selling is still speculation).

The private sector added 130K jobs in March while March and February were adjusted up. You'll not find a Democrat on the planet who claims this growth rate is enough, but it's still growth. And if you're going to beat the drum that this is the President's fault, name one jobs bill the Republican House has passed that the President has refused to sign.

He thinks the stock market tanked today. He is a bit...retarded. The stock market would have to tank about 6000 points to go back to Bush levels.

Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Wow. The spinderpsters are working triple OT.

Now, back in the real world, the jobs numbers came out, it looks like we're headed for a double dip, the stock market tanked on anemic growth and oil prices dropped sharply in anticipation that it won't be needed because there will be no increase in shipping demand.

In a few weeks, gas prices will fall because of this and I'm sure the spinsters won't blame the crappy economic outlook but probably say it's the new oversight on speculation (even though selling is still speculation).

You have no clue. You apparently don't live a real life. You just follow the job numbers because you want to see them suck because it will help your side. fark you.

Nope. I don't follow them at all. Wall Street does though and I lose real money when they lose confidence. If you don't think that the confidence of investors is what drives up jobs and vice versa, you're the one without a clue. Notice that I didn't "take a side." The economic outlook is what it is. Wall Street did tank today on jobs outlook. Oil prices did decline today in anticipation of less demand (i.e. negative growth). Those are facts. The people that suck are the ones that try to spin it into something that it isn't like the article of this thread. It's a global economy and a lot of the issues are still European in origin but it still affects jobs and the economy in the U.S. No investor looked at the reports today and said "Hey look! the private sector has recovered!" That should be obvious to everyone,even you. Maybe especially you. The people that are responsible for the nonsense in the article want you to pretend that everything has been fixed. Do you believe them?

Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Wow. The spinderpsters are working triple OT.

Now, back in the real world, the jobs numbers came out, it looks like we're headed for a double dip, the stock market tanked on anemic growth and oil prices dropped sharply in anticipation that it won't be needed because there will be no increase in shipping demand.

In a few weeks, gas prices will fall because of this and I'm sure the spinsters won't blame the crappy economic outlook but probably say it's the new oversight on speculation (even though selling is still speculation).

You have no clue. You apparently don't live a real life. You just follow the job numbers because you want to see them suck because it will help your side. fark you.

Nope. I don't follow them at all. Wall Street does though and I lose real money when they lose confidence. If you don't think that the confidence of investors is what drives up jobs and vice versa, you're the one without a clue. Notice that I didn't "take a side." The economic outlook is what it is. Wall Street did tank today on jobs outlook. Oil prices did decline today in anticipation of less demand (i.e. negative growth). Those are facts. The people that suck are the ones that try to spin it into something that it isn't like the article of this thread. It's a global economy and a lot of the issues are still European in origin but it still affects jobs and the economy in the U.S. No investor looked at the reports today and said "Hey look! the private sector has recovered!" That should be obvious to everyone,even you. Maybe especially you. The people that are responsible for the nonsense in the article want you to pretend that everything has been fixed. Do you believe them?

So you really DON'T live in the real world. Must be nice.

AdolfOliverPanties: So under Obama, private sector jobs have gone up very dramatically while he has shrunk government, kept Gitmo open, killed bin Laden, cut taxes. been a great friend of Wall Street and has deported more illegal immigrants than the previous president.

Why exactly do the Republicans hate this guy?

'Cuz he's, y'know...a non-Republican.

IlGreven: AdolfOliverPanties: So under Obama, private sector jobs have gone up very dramatically while he has shrunk government, kept Gitmo open, killed bin Laden, cut taxes. been a great friend of Wall Street and has deported more illegal immigrants than the previous president.

Why exactly do the Republicans hate this guy?

'Cuz he's, y'know...a non-Republican.

He is kinda dark.

Stile4aly: You'll not find a Democrat on the planet who claims this growth rate is enough

You can find plenty of democrats who will say this is enough. They're all in Washington DC. You'll also find a bunch of republicans who won't admit that some job growth is better than no job growth.

Lionel Mandrake: AdolfOliverPanties: So under Obama, private sector jobs have gone up very dramatically while he has shrunk government, kept Gitmo open, killed bin Laden, cut taxes. been a great friend of Wall Street and has deported more illegal immigrants than the previous president.

Why exactly do the Republicans hate this guy?

Because he's way better than they are at doing what they say they're good at?

Oh, and he's black

OgreMagi: Stile4aly: You'll not find a Democrat on the planet who claims this growth rate is enough

You can find plenty of democrats who will say this is enough. They're all in Washington DC. You'll also find a bunch of republicans who won't admit that some job growth is better than no job growth.

I like you a lot but the only thing you said that was worthwhile is that Republicans won't admit some job growth is better than no job growth.

OgreMagi: You can find plenty of democrats who will say this is enough.

Citation? I haven't seen any Democrats make that claim.

JohnnyC: OgreMagi: You can find plenty of democrats who will say this is enough.

Citation? I haven't seen any Democrats make that claim.

It's an election year. Give them time.

OgreMagi: JohnnyC: OgreMagi: You can find plenty of democrats who will say this is enough.

Citation? I haven't seen any Democrats make that claim.

It's an election year. Give them time.

Hmmm.

OgreMagi: JohnnyC: OgreMagi: You can find plenty of democrats who will say this is enough.

Citation? I haven't seen any Democrats make that claim.

It's an election year. Give them time.

"The things Republicans are saying are almost as bad as the things Democracts haven't said yet".

Got it.

Hetfield: OgreMagi: JohnnyC: OgreMagi: You can find plenty of democrats who will say this is enough.

Citation? I haven't seen any Democrats make that claim.

It's an election year. Give them time.

"The things Republicans are saying are almost as bad as the things Democracts haven't said yet".

Got it.

They WILL say it though. Book it!

OgreMagi: JohnnyC: OgreMagi: You can find plenty of democrats who will say this is enough.

Citation? I haven't seen any Democrats make that claim.

It's an election year. Give them time.

So... you entirely made that part up.

I think get where you're trying to go with that... but I'm not buying it. Democrats aren't going for milquetoast, "Oh... that's good enough"... they're going for, "we need to do more"... precisely because it IS an election year.

There is no need to denigrate Democrats for something they haven't said or even implied... surely you could come up with something the Democrats actually DID say to disparage them about?

Sabyen91: They WILL say it though. Book it!

"Moooooooom, why aren't Democrats saying the things we want them to say so our side won't look so bad? It's not faaaaaaaaaaair."

Hetfield: Sabyen91: They WILL say it though. Book it!

"Moooooooom, why aren't Democrats saying the things we want them to say so our side won't look so bad? It's not faaaaaaaaaaair."

Democrats will say "Oh, dark lord, look over us and bring our enemies to us...with their entrails hanging out of their open gut."

/Duh, that is what they say.

Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Wow. The spinderpsters are working triple OT.

Now, back in the real world, the jobs numbers came out, it looks like we're headed for a double dip, the stock market tanked on anemic growth and oil prices dropped sharply in anticipation that it won't be needed because there will be no increase in shipping demand.

In a few weeks, gas prices will fall because of this and I'm sure the spinsters won't blame the crappy economic outlook but probably say it's the new oversight on speculation (even though selling is still speculation).

You have no clue. You apparently don't live a real life. You just follow the job numbers because you want to see them suck because it will help your side. fark you.

Nope. I don't follow them at all. Wall Street does though and I lose real money when they lose confidence. If you don't think that the confidence of investors is what drives up jobs and vice versa, you're the one without a clue. Notice that I didn't "take a side." The economic outlook is what it is. Wall Street did tank today on jobs outlook. Oil prices did decline today in anticipation of less demand (i.e. negative growth). Those are facts. The people that suck are the ones that try to spin it into something that it isn't like the article of this thread. It's a global economy and a lot of the issues are still European in origin but it still affects jobs and the economy in the U.S. No investor looked at the reports today and said "Hey look! the private sector has recovered!" That should be obvious to everyone,even you. Maybe especially you. The people that are responsible for the nonsense in the article want you to pretend that everything has been fixed. Do you believe them?

So you really DON'T live in the real world. Must be nice.

No, apparently you are delusional. Did I just read that you are losing your private sector job? Did you read any economic reports of what today's job reports meant? The article cited for this thread wants you to believe hat private sector jobs have recovered. Do you believe them despite your own experience and the economic analysis on jobs that came out today? Wake up. Join the real world.

JohnnyC: OgreMagi: JohnnyC: OgreMagi: You can find plenty of democrats who will say this is enough.

Citation? I haven't seen any Democrats make that claim.

It's an election year. Give them time.

So... you entirely made that part up.

I think get where you're trying to go with that... but I'm not buying it. Democrats aren't going for milquetoast, "Oh... that's good enough"... they're going for, "we need to do more"... precisely because it IS an election year.

There is no need to denigrate Democrats for something they haven't said or even implied... surely you could come up with something the Democrats actually DID say to disparage them about?

If things don't continue to improve, I expect the democrats to tout how much things improved. And given the way things have been going, I don't really expect to see much improvement in the job situation. There's always business uncertainty before an election.

Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Wow. The spinderpsters are working triple OT.

Now, back in the real world, the jobs numbers came out, it looks like we're headed for a double dip, the stock market tanked on anemic growth and oil prices dropped sharply in anticipation that it won't be needed because there will be no increase in shipping demand.

In a few weeks, gas prices will fall because of this and I'm sure the spinsters won't blame the crappy economic outlook but probably say it's the new oversight on speculation (even though selling is still speculation).

You have no clue. You apparently don't live a real life. You just follow the job numbers because you want to see them suck because it will help your side. fark you.

Nope. I don't follow them at all. Wall Street does though and I lose real money when they lose confidence. If you don't think that the confidence of investors is what drives up jobs and vice versa, you're the one without a clue. Notice that I didn't "take a side." The economic outlook is what it is. Wall Street did tank today on jobs outlook. Oil prices did decline today in anticipation of less demand (i.e. negative growth). Those are facts. The people that suck are the ones that try to spin it into something that it isn't like the article of this thread. It's a global economy and a lot of the issues are still European in origin but it still affects jobs and the economy in the U.S. No investor looked at the reports today and said "Hey look! the private sector has recovered!" That should be obvious to everyone,even you. Maybe especially you. The people that are responsible for the nonsense in the article want you to pretend that everything has been fixed. Do you believe them?

So you really DON'T live in the real world. Must be nice.

No, apparently you are delusional. Did I just read that you are losing your private sector job? Did you read any economic reports of what today's job reports meant? The article ...

Wait, you think economic reports matter to individual job seekers? Huh.

OgreMagi: JohnnyC: OgreMagi: JohnnyC: OgreMagi: You can find plenty of democrats who will say this is enough.

Citation? I haven't seen any Democrats make that claim.

It's an election year. Give them time.

So... you entirely made that part up.

I think get where you're trying to go with that... but I'm not buying it. Democrats aren't going for milquetoast, "Oh... that's good enough"... they're going for, "we need to do more"... precisely because it IS an election year.

There is no need to denigrate Democrats for something they haven't said or even implied... surely you could come up with something the Democrats actually DID say to disparage them about?

If things don't continue to improve, I expect the democrats to tout how much things improved. And given the way things have been going, I don't really expect to see much improvement in the job situation. There's always business uncertainty before an election.

Things have been improving for two years straight. I don't see Republicans acknowledging it.

Sabyen91: Democrats will say "Oh, dark lord, look over us and bring our enemies to us...with their entrails hanging out of their open gut."

That is decidedly a more red-meat Republican kind of thing (crosshairs, we didn't come armed this time, etc).

And honestly I don't think even the Republicans would go that far... out of fear that it wouldn't play well with moderates.

JohnnyC: Sabyen91: Democrats will say "Oh, dark lord, look over us and bring our enemies to us...with their entrails hanging out of their open gut."

That is decidedly a more red-meat Republican kind of thing (crosshairs, we didn't come armed this time, etc).

And honestly I don't think even the Republicans would go that far... out of fear that it wouldn't play well with moderates.

Pussies.