Kibbler: I remember 2004 so well, when a large majority of people in this country had that "accept what I say or DIE YOU FARKING TRAITOR SCUM" derpality.

ah, i remember that well. it was also when it became popular to mock the Purple Heart award. Oh GOP, such classy farktards.

elchip: [i.imgur.com image 576x464]

Came for this. Satisfied.

Yeah, these are the farking morons fueling the backlash against climate change. They have as much credibility as an Evangelist with a pocket full of meth and his pants around his ankles, and people still give them credence.

whatshisname:

Yeah, these are the farking morons fueling the backlash against climate change

Now, now... They have in fact studied all the blogs. Blogs are truth.

They have a reality all their own where scientists are all in on the UN 21 conspiracy. All of them!

And how could you fault them for that?

It's wonderful. Science works so long as it agrees with me, otherwise it's big Government conspiracy.

Wake up, sheeple! The scientific community has no more checks on it than that jerk who doesn't want me to be king of my club!

maxheck: whatshisname:

Yeah, these are the farking morons fueling the backlash against climate change

Now, now... They have in fact studied all the blogs. Blogs are truth.

They have a reality all their own where scientists are all in on the UN 21 conspiracy. All of them!

And how could you fault them for that?

It's wonderful. Science works so long as it agrees with me, otherwise it's big Government conspiracy.

Wake up, sheeple! The scientific community has no more checks on it than that jerk who doesn't want me to be king of my club!



`
No Comment

Dammit Bill,
whatshisname why do you always do that?

Well, if you don't mind... That might be something to talk about.

Chuckufarlie (see the pattern there? might be abrasive up front, and his own admitted posting everywhere might just be ADD,but I'll go back to the people who work in the field.

He'll always be there in on form or another.

But if you go back to the folks who might know about climate change, they are sort of saying the same thing.

toraque: "The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren't following the climate change debate"

Well, if your argument can't stand on facts, you can always take the emotional appeal route.

That's the liberal's argument to the very word regarding their philosophy on control. Appeal to the emotional base, win votes!

/Heartland Institute should be thrown under the bus, and I'm a libertarian
//Believer of global climate change, just don't think Congress knows enough to enforce ground rules and have it enforced competently

maxheck: Well, if you don't mind... That might be something to talk about.

Chuckufarlie (see the pattern there? might be abrasive up front, and his own admitted posting everywhere might just be ADD,but I'll go back to the people who work in the field.

He'll always be there in on form or another.

But if you go back to the folks who might know about climate change, they are sort of saying the same thing.

Wait, wait. Are you saying that nicksteel/chuckufarlie has scientific data on his side about something? I think you've been partaking of mind-altering chemicals and am hurt that you're not sharing.

How farking clueless are libertarians?

/Answer: Very.

whatshisname: Yeah, these are the farking morons fueling the backlash against climate change. They have as much credibility as an Evangelist with a pocket full of meth and his pants around his ankles, and people still give them credence.

Now now, if you look at their press release (here - scroll down to 6. Why should I believe The Heartland Institute?) they clearly make it a point to mention that they have more than 15 years of experience in climate change.

15 years! Stick that up your "scientists" and smoke it. Clearly they are the expertier experts than anyone else.

Lenny_da_Hog: Corporate Self: The Green Nazis

Snazis.

/old joke nobody remembers.

I vaguely remember it. I know it is almost like armies. Bad joke but I can't quite remember.

HighZoolander: whatshisname: Yeah, these are the farking morons fueling the backlash against climate change. They have as much credibility as an Evangelist with a pocket full of meth and his pants around his ankles, and people still give them credence.

Now now, if you look at their press release (here - scroll down to 6. Why should I believe The Heartland Institute?) they clearly make it a point to mention that they have more than 15 years of experience in climate change.

15 years! Stick that up your "scientists" and smoke it. Clearly they are the expertier experts than anyone else.

LOL'd.

I believe the right is correct and should be listened to...

Sabyen91: [upload.wikimedia.org image 245x343]

I believe the right is correct and should be listened to...

By the way...does he not resemble Charles Krauthammer?

Sabyen91: Sabyen91: [upload.wikimedia.org image 245x343]

I believe the right is correct and should be listened to...

By the way...does he not resemble Charles Krauthammer?

Jesus. He does.

Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.), scheduled to headline the Heartland Institute's annual conclave of climate-change skeptics this month, said through a spokeswoman that he "will not participate in the upcoming climate-change conference if the Heartland Institute decides to continue this ad campaign."

Oh, dandy, my gerrymandered new Rep decided that would hurt him. fark you Sensenbrenner. Have a stroke already.

Lenny_da_Hog: Sabyen91: Sabyen91: [upload.wikimedia.org image 245x343]

I believe the right is correct and should be listened to...

By the way...does he not resemble Charles Krauthammer?

Jesus. He does.

The difference is he could walk away from his crimes...

/too soon?

Sabyen91: Oh, dandy, my gerrymandered new Rep decided that would hurt him. fark you Sensenbrenner. Have a stroke already

It's more of a moment of clarity that he thinks even they're too extreme and not contributing to the debate (such as it is) on climate change.

toraque: "The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren't following the climate change debate"

Well, if your argument can't stand on facts, you can always take the emotional appeal route.

Have you ever seen an Algore presentation?

In announcing the ad campaign on its Web site, the Heartland Institute said it was also going to deploy images of Charles Manson, "tyrant" Fidel Castro and Osama bin Laden in future billboards.

Marquis de Sade, Bad King John and farking Ted Bundy all said they don't believe in climate change.

/I really thought the Marquis was brighter than that.

Ken VeryBigLiar: Sabyen91: Oh, dandy, my gerrymandered new Rep decided that would hurt him. fark you Sensenbrenner. Have a stroke already

It's more of a moment of clarity that he thinks even they're too extreme and not contributing to the debate (such as it is) on climate change.

Amazing. Too extreme for Sensenbrenner. I am horrified that I am gerrymandered from a solid Madison district to a farking Milwaukee suburb district.

Chimperror2: toraque: "The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren't following the climate change debate"

Well, if your argument can't stand on facts, you can always take the emotional appeal route.

Have you ever seen an Algore presentation?

I am so interested. Have you? Let's see your counter.

The Heartland Institute made news earlier this year when internal documents appeared on liberal Web sites detailing the group's funders and its strategy to promote climate-change skepticism to schoolchildren. Climate scientist Peter Gleick of the Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security admitted to duping the group into sending him the documents.

Haha! Why do they not go slink off into that good night?

Sabyen91: Amazing. Too extreme for Sensenbrenner. I am horrified that I am gerrymandered from a solid Madison district to a farking Milwaukee suburb district.

I was horrified enough when I moved out here from the boonies and went from good ol' boy Republicans like Tommy to these crypto-evangelicals who think I give two shiats about abortion and how sex ed is taught.

Ken VeryBigLiar: Sabyen91: Amazing. Too extreme for Sensenbrenner. I am horrified that I am gerrymandered from a solid Madison district to a farking Milwaukee suburb district.

I was horrified enough when I moved out here from the boonies and went from good ol' boy Republicans like Tommy to these crypto-evangelicals who think I give two shiats about abortion and how sex ed is taught.

I live in a conservative area. At least I could have Tammy Baldwin as a Rep and Andy Jorgensen as a state Assemblyman. Now I have nothing but the worst of Republicans "representing" me. And Andy will probably lose because of the gerrymandering. The only plus is I have a slightly less objectionable righty representing me in the state Senate. I don't have the Dune Worm Fitzgerald anymore.

Ken VeryBigLiar: Sabyen91: Amazing. Too extreme for Sensenbrenner. I am horrified that I am gerrymandered from a solid Madison district to a farking Milwaukee suburb district.

I was horrified enough when I moved out here from the boonies and went from good ol' boy Republicans like Tommy to these crypto-evangelicals who think I give two shiats about abortion and how sex ed is taught.

Don't worry, Tommy will be your Senator soon...

/Kill me.

Satanic_Hamster: Out of pants shiatting curiosity...

In announcing the ad campaign on its Web site, the Heartland Institute said it was also going to deploy images of Charles Manson, "tyrant" Fidel Castro and Osama bin Laden in future billboards.

Did anyone of those people actually even come out in support of man made global warming?

You don't read the news much, do you. This is the week where we learned (as part of the Obama strategy for re-election by releasing documents obtained during the bin Laden operation) that a) KeithOlbermann isn't a terrorist but is #1 with terrorists and b) al Qaeda wanted the news to make Global Warming more of a threat than al Qaeda in the hopes that they would be bombed less. Apparently al Qaeda, in addition to feeling threatened by AGW, believes Fox News is controlled by the government (i.e. Obama).

Chimperror2: Satanic_Hamster: Out of pants shiatting curiosity...

In announcing the ad campaign on its Web site, the Heartland Institute said it was also going to deploy images of Charles Manson, "tyrant" Fidel Castro and Osama bin Laden in future billboards.

Did anyone of those people actually even come out in support of man made global warming?

You don't read the news much, do you. This is the week where we learned (as part of the Obama strategy for re-election by releasing documents obtained during the bin Laden operation) that a) KeithOlbermann isn't a terrorist but is #1 with terrorists and b) al Qaeda wanted the news to make Global Warming more of a threat than al Qaeda in the hopes that they would be bombed less. Apparently al Qaeda, in addition to feeling threatened by AGW, believes Fox News is controlled by the government (i.e. Obama).

Nobody watches your retarded news channel.

Sabyen91: Chimperror2: toraque: "The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren't following the climate change debate"

Well, if your argument can't stand on facts, you can always take the emotional appeal route.

Have you ever seen an Algore presentation?

I am so interested. Have you? Let's see your counter.

Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: toraque: "The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren't following the climate change debate"

Well, if your argument can't stand on facts, you can always take the emotional appeal route.

Have you ever seen an Algore presentation?

I am so interested. Have you? Let's see your counter.
[wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com image 480x471]

So...no?

Sabyen91: Don't worry, Tommy will be your Senator soon...

/Kill me.

He beats Neumann and Hovde's respective acts of being part of the problem and now advertising themselves as the solution to it. Although why he's running is beyond me. He's easily pulling down eight figures on the various boards and businesses he's involved with, not to mention his various state and federal pensions (should he be drawing on them). Coupled with the shift from when he was in charge it's hard to see where the upside to running is for him.

Ken VeryBigLiar: Sabyen91: Don't worry, Tommy will be your Senator soon...

/Kill me.

He beats Neumann and Hovde's respective acts of being part of the problem and now advertising themselves as the solution to it. Although why he's running is beyond me. He's easily pulling down eight figures on the various boards and businesses he's involved with, not to mention his various state and federal pensions (should he be drawing on them). Coupled with the shift from when he was in charge it's hard to see where the upside to running is for him.

I had no clue what Hovde was running for. I have seen his shiatty ads and I hated him immediately and learned that he is nothing but a worthless financial douche. I would vote for Tommy over that cock. And he has been buying a shiatload of ads.

Ken VeryBigLiar: Sabyen91: Don't worry, Tommy will be your Senator soon...

/Kill me.

He beats Neumann and Hovde's respective acts of being part of the problem and now advertising themselves as the solution to it. Although why he's running is beyond me. He's easily pulling down eight figures on the various boards and businesses he's involved with, not to mention his various state and federal pensions (should he be drawing on them). Coupled with the shift from when he was in charge it's hard to see where the upside to running is for him.

Thompson is a big reason we have farking school vouchers and poor women have to pay half their salary to daycare workers. fark him.

Sabyen91: Thompson is a big reason we have farking school vouchers and poor women have to pay half their salary to daycare workers. fark him.

Well, if you're a Republican it's either him or two guys trying to convince you they're teabaggers when in reality one's been an government insider for 20 years (and a third rate home builder to boot) while the other's been out of the state for 25 years living on Wall Street.

Ken VeryBigLiar: Sabyen91: Thompson is a big reason we have farking school vouchers and poor women have to pay half their salary to daycare workers. fark him.

Well, if you're a Republican it's either him or two guys trying to convince you they're teabaggers when in reality one's been an government insider for 20 years (and a third rate home builder to boot) while the other's been out of the state for 25 years living on Wall Street.

If you are a Republican you should take the honorable way out.

Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: toraque: "The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren't following the climate change debate"

Well, if your argument can't stand on facts, you can always take the emotional appeal route.

Have you ever seen an Algore presentation?

I am so interested. Have you? Let's see your counter.
[wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com image 480x471]

So...no?

So ... no, you haven't seen the emotional appeal of the demise of Polar Bears or pictures of weather in New Orleans that are scientifically unrelated to climate change?

Ken VeryBigLiar: Sabyen91: Thompson is a big reason we have farking school vouchers and poor women have to pay half their salary to daycare workers. fark him.

Well, if you're a Republican it's either him or two guys trying to convince you they're teabaggers when in reality one's been an government insider for 20 years (and a third rate home builder to boot) while the other's been out of the state for 25 years living on Wall Street.

The Hovde ads kill me. Acting like he is one of the guys...as he has been farking everybody for years. That guy is an evil douche. Neumann? I think he actually has a heart. Hovde? Pure evil.

Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: toraque: "The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren't following the climate change debate"

Well, if your argument can't stand on facts, you can always take the emotional appeal route.

Have you ever seen an Algore presentation?

I am so interested. Have you? Let's see your counter.
[wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com image 480x471]

So...no?

So ... no, you haven't seen the emotional appeal of the demise of Polar Bears or pictures of weather in New Orleans that are scientifically unrelated to climate change?

How many times did Gore use polar bears?

Pathetic. The Scopes Monkey Trial is alive and well in america and other third world countries.

Sabyen91: The Hovde ads kill me. Acting like he is one of the guys...as he has been farking everybody for years. That guy is an evil douche. Neumann? I think he actually has a heart. Hovde? Pure evil.

If Wisconsin doesn't want to get lost in the shuffle when the Senate starts dishing out pork then it would be better to elect Baldwin or Tommy. At least then we'd have someone who has been around Washington and can grab some recognition right away. It's not like electing Ron Johnson two years ago did us any favors. It seems all he's done is piss off his staff and receive a nice pension so he doesn't have to work for his father-in-law's money anymore.

aearra: Pathetic. The Scopes Monkey Trial is alive and well in america and other third world countries.

William Jennings Bryan in his later insane years is apparently a hero.

Ken VeryBigLiar: Sabyen91: The Hovde ads kill me. Acting like he is one of the guys...as he has been farking everybody for years. That guy is an evil douche. Neumann? I think he actually has a heart. Hovde? Pure evil.

If Wisconsin doesn't want to get lost in the shuffle when the Senate starts dishing out pork then it would be better to elect Baldwin or Tommy. At least then we'd have someone who has been around Washington and can grab some recognition right away. It's not like electing Ron Johnson two years ago did us any favors. It seems all he's done is piss off his staff and receive a nice pension so he doesn't have to work for his father-in-law's money anymore.

It will be Baldwin vs. Thompson. The teabaggers will be left behind this time around.

Sabyen91: It will be Baldwin vs. Thompson. The teabaggers will be left behind this time around.

Certainly looks that way. Makes me wonder what the hell Feingold is holding out for, a cabinet post? Is he hoping they tell Biden to get lost if Obama wins and he'll be the new VP?

Ken VeryBigLiar: Sabyen91: It will be Baldwin vs. Thompson. The teabaggers will be left behind this time around.

Certainly looks that way. Makes me wonder what the hell Feingold is holding out for, a cabinet post? Is he hoping they tell Biden to get lost if Obama wins and he'll be the new VP?

I don't know. I think he is butthurt. I am a big fan of his but what the hell, dude?

Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: toraque: "The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren't following the climate change debate"

Well, if your argument can't stand on facts, you can always take the emotional appeal route.

Have you ever seen an Algore presentation?

I am so interested. Have you? Let's see your counter.
[wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com image 480x471]

So...no?

So ... no, you haven't seen the emotional appeal of the demise of Polar Bears or pictures of weather in New Orleans that are scientifically unrelated to climate change?

How many times did Gore use polar bears?

How many times was 'An Inconvenient Truth' shown?

Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: toraque: "The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren't following the climate change debate"

Well, if your argument can't stand on facts, you can always take the emotional appeal route.

Have you ever seen an Algore presentation?

I am so interested. Have you? Let's see your counter.
[wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com image 480x471]

So...no?

So ... no, you haven't seen the emotional appeal of the demise of Polar Bears or pictures of weather in New Orleans that are scientifically unrelated to climate change?

How many times did Gore use polar bears?

How many times was 'An Inconvenient Truth' shown?

Is that a response to my question? I don't think it is. Also, how many times WAS 'An Inconvenient Truth' shown? Very few times in your area, I am guessing.

Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: Sabyen91: Chimperror2: toraque: "The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren't following the climate change debate"

Well, if your argument can't stand on facts, you can always take the emotional appeal route.

Have you ever seen an Algore presentation?

I am so interested. Have you? Let's see your counter.
[wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com image 480x471]

So...no?

So ... no, you haven't seen the emotional appeal of the demise of Polar Bears or pictures of weather in New Orleans that are scientifically unrelated to climate change?

How many times did Gore use polar bears?

How many times was 'An Inconvenient Truth' shown?

Is that a response to my question? I don't think it is. Also, how many times WAS 'An Inconvenient Truth' shown? Very few times in your area, I am guessing.

So you don't remember Polar Bears being used in AIT? You do realize that everything presented about polar bears in AIT was an appeal to emotion and not scientifically related to climate change, right? You also realize that all his presentations that showed hurricane Katrina were also appeals to emotion without any scientific linkage to climate change?