smeegle: chuckufarlie: Do you call your teachers at school arrogant when they try to teach you the facts?

My professors where never in your league swami.

since when do we refer to teachers at middle schools as professor?

lockers: intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: no, I teach here.

You teach that anyone with a GED can get paid to write bullshiat online for right wing spin machines.

If he is getting paid, it is to engage you dorks so you won't discuss that the Heartland Institute aren't a bunch of odious cocks.

another idiot who believes somebody might get paid to post here.

chuckufarlie: no, I teach here.

You teach on Fark? Really?
That's delusional.

So, tell me more about your fark feelings. No really.

spongeboob: Mad Tea Party: spongeboob: Didn't you read that particular previous post out of the 90 or so where he stated that there were problems with peer review, because he is going to come back and say that he already addressed that and you should maybe Google it yourself.

Well, I know that peer review is totally unreliable because he says so, so I wonder how it is he knows to such a great certainty that there's been a +1°C increase. I'll need to see evidence that doesn't come from IPCC or a peer-reviewed paper.

I await his response to this post.

I guess that you are all unaware that there have been temperature recording stations set up all over the planet to record temperature data. That has nothing to do with peer review, that is actual data. Peer review has nothing to do with gathering data. The data comes from the CRU. How many times much I point that out?

chuckufarlie: I can not understand how anybody can be so stupid that he would actually believe that anybody is getting paid to post on FARK. You are that stupid.

Probably because you admitted this to be true with your old nicksteel alt.

Link

Link

smeegle: chuckufarlie: no, I teach here.

You teach on Fark? Really?
That's delusional.

So, tell me more about your fark feelings. No really.

somebody has to educate you morons.

Mad Tea Party: chuckufarlie: I can not understand how anybody can be so stupid that he would actually believe that anybody is getting paid to post on FARK. You are that stupid.

Probably because you admitted this to be true with your old nicksteel alt.

Link

Link

No, there is nothing in those links where I admit that I am getting paid to post here. But then, anybody stupid enough to believe that anybody would get paid to post here is stupid enough to believe that the links have some sort of proof.

chuckufarlie: since when do we refer to teachers at middle schools as professor

Clever in a small dick kinda way.
Let's face it. You ARE a dick and that has been made clear here in this thread.
Forever recorded in the internet stream. Mr. Dick
Lucky you.

spongeboob: chuckufarlie: intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: I got my information from the CRU. The IPCC openly admits that they edit the reports to make them more politically acceptable. I am not denying what they SAID about sea levels. I am saying that they have not conducted any research on sea level changes.

So then you admit sea levels are indeed rising as they claim?

How did you get that out of what I posted? The IPCC says lots of things that are not true. The IPCC has conducted no research on sea levels. There are people doing research on sea levels but they are not associated with the IPCC. Those other people report that the sea level is not rising. Besides, the Maldives are still above water.

DO you really think all of these changes are going to happen when the average temperature increase has been less than one degree Celsius? Really?

So IPCC cool when they say average change is less than one degree Celsius, but not cool with any results from that change.

Why are you so hung up on the less than one degree Celsius change? Can you just not grasp that small numbers can be significant?

In this case, small numbers are not significant. We are talking about an increase in temperature large enough to melt the polar ice caps and glaciers. Small numbers will not do that.

smeegle: chuckufarlie: since when do we refer to teachers at middle schools as professor

Clever in a small dick kinda way.
Let's face it. You ARE a dick and that has been made clear here in this thread.
Forever recorded in the internet stream. Mr. Dick
Lucky you.

Any particular reason why you are fixated on penises?

chuckufarlie: somebody has to educate you morons.

Might as well be you right? Since you ARE an authority and all and nobody listens to you outside of cyber space.
Must be so frustrating.

chuckufarlie: Any particular reason why you are fixated on penises?

Probably because I am picturing your serial killer head as being dick shaped. Stupid.
So chuckles where did you bury the bodies?

smeegle: chuckufarlie: Any particular reason why you are fixated on penises?

Probably because I am picturing your serial killer head as being dick shaped. Stupid.
So chuckles where did you bury the bodies?

can you get any more ignorant?

chuckufarlie: Besides, the Maldives are still above water.

There goes that strawman again.

lockers: odious cocks.

Indeed

lockers:
If he is getting paid, it is to engage you dorks so you won't discuss that the Heartland Institute aren't a bunch of odious cocks.


We covered that already when he tried to use that website as proof of the FATHER OF CLIMATOLOGY and some actual "peer reviewed science"

spongeboob: chuckufarlie: spongeboob: Mad Tea Party: spongeboob: Didn't you read that particular previous post out of the 90 or so where he stated that there were problems with peer review, because he is going to come back and say that he already addressed that and you should maybe Google it yourself.

Well, I know that peer review is totally unreliable because he says so, so I wonder how it is he knows to such a great certainty that there's been a +1°C increase. I'll need to see evidence that doesn't come from IPCC or a peer-reviewed paper.

I await his response to this post.

I guess that you are all unaware that there have been temperature recording stations set up all over the planet to record temperature data. That has nothing to do with peer review, that is actual data. Peer review has nothing to do with gathering data. The data comes from the CRU. How many times much I point that out?

So what is your hardon against peer review and remember I am dumbass so explain it to me like I'm in High School.

1. I am pretty sure that you will not enter high school for at least two years.

2. There are plenty of places on the 'net that will explain to you the flaws inherent in the peer review process. Maybe you can find some sites that are written at a level that you can understand.

chuckufarlie: another idiot who believes somebody might get paid to post here.

There are people who indeed get paid to post right wing bullshiat online. Koch brothers are the biggest employers. Their only requirement is that you such Koch for money, and going by all your replies we see that you indeed do.

chuckufarlie: can you get any more ignorant?


You really need to add another word to your mental library. Try the Thesaurus.

intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: Besides, the Maldives are still above water.

There goes that strawman again.

1. You do not know what a strawman is.

2. If you have any knowledge of the subject, you would see that a mention of the Maldives is quite relevant in any discussion concerning sea levels.

chuckufarlie: 2. There are plenty of places on the 'net that will explain to you the flaws inherent in the peer review process. Maybe you can find some sites that are written at a level that you can understand.


Like Heartland.org?

smeegle: chuckufarlie: can you get any more ignorant?


You really need to add another word to your mental library. Try the Thesaurus.

I find that using the same term over and over makes it easier for idiots to understand.

chuckufarlie: lockers: intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: no, I teach here.

You teach that anyone with a GED can get paid to write bullshiat online for right wing spin machines.

If he is getting paid, it is to engage you dorks so you won't discuss that the Heartland Institute aren't a bunch of odious cocks.

another idiot who believes somebody might get paid to post here.

Paid? Oh god no. I think your playing an alt in your moms basement, on this sad lonely friday. The orange crumbs from the cheetos having rubbed your foreskin raw. Desperately you've sought out anything, anyone to give affection, even if it is negative. And that whore who had the nerve to turn you down at your job at mcburgers doesn't know what she's missing. But you eventually stopped crying during your furious masturbation to the little mermaid and decided enough was enough, fark is only a button click away.

I'm just here to avoid talking to my girlfriend.

/hugs
//it's gonna be okay sweetums

intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: 2. There are plenty of places on the 'net that will explain to you the flaws inherent in the peer review process. Maybe you can find some sites that are written at a level that you can understand.


Like Heartland.org?

No, that one would be over your head.

chuckufarlie: smeegle: chuckufarlie: can you get any more ignorant?


You really need to add another word to your mental library. Try the Thesaurus.

I find that using the same term over and over makes it easier for idiots to understand.

I rest my case.

chuckufarlie: 1. You do not know what a strawman is.

2. If you have any knowledge of the subject, you would see that a mention of the Maldives is quite relevant in any discussion concerning sea levels.

1. No, I think you do. The Maldives being above water does not disprove any of the research and science already done talking about rising sea levels

2. If you had any knowledge on the subject no study has claimed it should be under water.

lockers: chuckufarlie: lockers: intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: no, I teach here.

You teach that anyone with a GED can get paid to write bullshiat online for right wing spin machines.

If he is getting paid, it is to engage you dorks so you won't discuss that the Heartland Institute aren't a bunch of odious cocks.

another idiot who believes somebody might get paid to post here.

Paid? Oh god no. I think your playing an alt in your moms basement, on this sad lonely friday. The orange crumbs from the cheetos having rubbed your foreskin raw. Desperately you've sought out anything, anyone to give affection, even if it is negative. And that whore who had the nerve to turn you down at your job at mcburgers doesn't know what she's missing. But you eventually stopped crying during your furious masturbation to the little mermaid and decided enough was enough, fark is only a button click away.

I'm just here to avoid talking to my girlfriend.

/hugs
//it's gonna be okay sweetums

If you don't want to talk to your girlfriend, don't inflate her.

chuckufarlie: No, that one would be over your head.

Your best joke yet. GOODNIGHT SWEET PRINCE.

intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: 1. You do not know what a strawman is.

2. If you have any knowledge of the subject, you would see that a mention of the Maldives is quite relevant in any discussion concerning sea levels.

1. No, I think you do. The Maldives being above water does not disprove any of the research and science already done talking about rising sea levels

2. If you had any knowledge on the subject no study has claimed it should be under water.

Really? Guess you have not read the IPCC reports.

chuckufarlie: spongeboob: chuckufarlie: intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: I got my information from the CRU. The IPCC openly admits that they edit the reports to make them more politically acceptable. I am not denying what they SAID about sea levels. I am saying that they have not conducted any research on sea level changes.

So then you admit sea levels are indeed rising as they claim?

How did you get that out of what I posted? The IPCC says lots of things that are not true. The IPCC has conducted no research on sea levels. There are people doing research on sea levels but they are not associated with the IPCC. Those other people report that the sea level is not rising. Besides, the Maldives are still above water.

DO you really think all of these changes are going to happen when the average temperature increase has been less than one degree Celsius? Really?

So IPCC cool when they say average change is less than one degree Celsius, but not cool with any results from that change.

Why are you so hung up on the less than one degree Celsius change? Can you just not grasp that small numbers can be significant?

In this case, small numbers are not significant. We are talking about an increase in temperature large enough to melt the polar ice caps and glaciers. Small numbers will not do that.

chill out chuckles, and yes everything counts in small points.
Link

smeegle: chuckufarlie: smeegle: chuckufarlie: can you get any more ignorant?


You really need to add another word to your mental library. Try the Thesaurus.

I find that using the same term over and over makes it easier for idiots to understand.

I rest my case.

see, even you could understand.

spongeboob: chuckufarlie: spongeboob: chuckufarlie: spongeboob: Mad Tea Party: spongeboob: Didn't you read that particular previous post out of the 90 or so where he stated that there were problems with peer review, because he is going to come back and say that he already addressed that and you should maybe Google it yourself.

Well, I know that peer review is totally unreliable because he says so, so I wonder how it is he knows to such a great certainty that there's been a +1°C increase. I'll need to see evidence that doesn't come from IPCC or a peer-reviewed paper.

I await his response to this post.

I guess that you are all unaware that there have been temperature recording stations set up all over the planet to record temperature data. That has nothing to do with peer review, that is actual data. Peer review has nothing to do with gathering data. The data comes from the CRU. How many times much I point that out?

So what is your hardon against peer review and remember I am dumbass so explain it to me like I'm in High School.

1. I am pretty sure that you will not enter high school for at least two years.

2. There are plenty of places on the 'net that will explain to you the flaws inherent in the peer review process. Maybe you can find some sites that are written at a level that you can understand.

So you got nothing.

I am sorry that your plans never really worked out and that the world has never seen your true genius.

this from a moron who posts opinions with nothing to support them. This from an idiot who has shown time and time again that you are operating on two active brain cells.

amounts*
/whoops

chuckufarlie: Really? Guess you have not read the IPCC reports.

So are sea levels rising or not? You claimed NO. But have no research to back this up. Your proof sea levels aren't rising? The Maldives are above water! Amazing logic! I said go back to the mess hall soldier. You're a waste of oxygen at least pretend like you're doing something.

chuckufarlie: this from a moron who posts opinions with nothing to support them. This from an idiot who has shown time and time again that you are operating on two active brain cells.

intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: Really? Guess you have not read the IPCC reports.

So are sea levels rising or not? You claimed NO. But have no research to back this up. Your proof sea levels aren't rising? The Maldives are above water! Amazing logic! I said go back to the mess hall soldier. You're a waste of oxygen at least pretend like you're doing something.


google it.

chuckufarlie: lockers: chuckufarlie: lockers: intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: no, I teach here.

You teach that anyone with a GED can get paid to write bullshiat online for right wing spin machines.

If he is getting paid, it is to engage you dorks so you won't discuss that the Heartland Institute aren't a bunch of odious cocks.

another idiot who believes somebody might get paid to post here.

Paid? Oh god no. I think your playing an alt in your moms basement, on this sad lonely friday. The orange crumbs from the cheetos having rubbed your foreskin raw. Desperately you've sought out anything, anyone to give affection, even if it is negative. And that whore who had the nerve to turn you down at your job at mcburgers doesn't know what she's missing. But you eventually stopped crying during your furious masturbation to the little mermaid and decided enough was enough, fark is only a button click away.

I'm just here to avoid talking to my girlfriend.

/hugs
//it's gonna be okay sweetums

If you don't want to talk to your girlfriend, don't inflate her.

So your not denying any of that, you just imagine that the only girlfriends that are possible are inflated? I understand, but even for a fat chronic masturbator, there is someone outthere who is into that sort of thing

spongeboob: chuckufarlie: spongeboob: chuckufarlie: spongeboob: chuckufarlie: spongeboob: Mad Tea Party: spongeboob: Didn't you read that particular previous post out of the 90 or so where he stated that there were problems with peer review, because he is going to come back and say that he already addressed that and you should maybe Google it yourself.

Well, I know that peer review is totally unreliable because he says so, so I wonder how it is he knows to such a great certainty that there's been a +1°C increase. I'll need to see evidence that doesn't come from IPCC or a peer-reviewed paper.

I await his response to this post.

I guess that you are all unaware that there have been temperature recording stations set up all over the planet to record temperature data. That has nothing to do with peer review, that is actual data. Peer review has nothing to do with gathering data. The data comes from the CRU. How many times much I point that out?

So what is your hardon against peer review and remember I am dumbass so explain it to me like I'm in High School.

1. I am pretty sure that you will not enter high school for at least two years.

2. There are plenty of places on the 'net that will explain to you the flaws inherent in the peer review process. Maybe you can find some sites that are written at a level that you can understand.

So you got nothing.

I am sorry that your plans never really worked out and that the world has never seen your true genius.

this from a moron who posts opinions with nothing to support them. This from an idiot who has shown time and time again that you are operating on two active brain cells.

I still feel sorry for you, and would give you a hug if I could. Hey go out tonight and be around some people it will make you feel better.

And you may have me confused with someone else because I did post links in a bunch of my posts, including the one where I agreed with you in the average increase in temperature being less than one degree Celsius.

yes, all of you morons do have a tendency to merge.

Wow. This is just one step away from Godwin'ng it.

lockers: chuckufarlie: lockers: chuckufarlie: lockers: intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: no, I teach here.

You teach that anyone with a GED can get paid to write bullshiat online for right wing spin machines.

If he is getting paid, it is to engage you dorks so you won't discuss that the Heartland Institute aren't a bunch of odious cocks.

another idiot who believes somebody might get paid to post here.

Paid? Oh god no. I think your playing an alt in your moms basement, on this sad lonely friday. The orange crumbs from the cheetos having rubbed your foreskin raw. Desperately you've sought out anything, anyone to give affection, even if it is negative. And that whore who had the nerve to turn you down at your job at mcburgers doesn't know what she's missing. But you eventually stopped crying during your furious masturbation to the little mermaid and decided enough was enough, fark is only a button click away.

I'm just here to avoid talking to my girlfriend.

/hugs
//it's gonna be okay sweetums

If you don't want to talk to your girlfriend, don't inflate her.

So your not denying any of that, you just imagine that the only girlfriends that are possible are inflated? I understand, but even for a fat chronic masturbator, there is someone outthere who is into that sort of thing

What are you talking about, I ignored the bulk of your post because it was just too stupid to even consider. As for girl friends, I only imagine that YOUR girl friend is inflatable.

chuckufarlie: google it.

You mean google something I already posted that showed sea levels rising, refuting your claim that they weren't? Don't make me copy and paste your ignorant comment, be a man and admit a mistake. You are a man, aren't you?

There are five lights.

chuckufarlie: What are you talking about, I ignored the bulk of your post because it was just too stupid to even consider. As for girl friends, I only imagine that YOUR girl friend is inflatable.

And yet she still would be smarter than you and your cousin in your trailer home.

intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: google it.

You mean google something I already posted that showed sea levels rising, refuting your claim that they weren't? Don't make me copy and paste your ignorant comment, be a man and admit a mistake. You are a man, aren't you?

you did not post anything that showed sea levels are rising. You quoted an IPCC report that was not based on actual research. That proves nothing.

intelligent comment below: chuckufarlie: What are you talking about, I ignored the bulk of your post because it was just too stupid to even consider. As for girl friends, I only imagine that YOUR girl friend is inflatable.

And yet she still would be smarter than you and your cousin in your trailer home.

Another comment displaying your immaturity.