If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Talking Points Memo)   George Zimmerman's legal team advised him to shut down his donation site... until they realized that they could scam boatloads of money from dumb racists and have put the website back online   (livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com) divider line 326
    More: Followup, donations, racists  
•       •       •

7305 clicks; posted to Main » on 04 May 2012 at 1:17 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



326 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-05-04 04:50:33 PM

timujin: AbortionsForAll: You're insinuating that roving gangs of violent blacks attacking/victimizing white people all over the country as a result of this Trayvon Martin thing is not actually relevant

wait, hold on a second. I've seen one link where a bunch of black people spontaneously got together and beat up a white dude and are claimed to have said something about Trayvon afterward. Where are these "roving gangs"? Where else in the country have they attacked or victimized white people?


http://hamptonroads.com.nyud.net/2012/05/beating-church-and-brambleto n

http://globalgrind.com/news/Alton-L-Hayes-III-trayvon-martin-fight-De t ails

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46885491/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/us - teen-guilty-murdering-british-tourists/#.T4KFgO3fFcg

More..?
 
2012-05-04 04:52:55 PM
http://lewiscypher.multiply.com/journal/item/429?mark_read=lewiscypher :journal:429&show_interstitial=1&u=%2Fjournal%2Fitem
 
2012-05-04 04:54:02 PM

AbortionsForAll: http://lewiscypher.multiply.com/journal/item/429?mark_read=lewiscyphe r :journal:429&show_interstitial=1&u=%2Fjournal%2Fitem


(that last link actually has several seperate examples).

I really don't feel like I need to keep pasting more links. I mean it's pretty self-evident at this point.
 
2012-05-04 04:54:07 PM
Whoa....looks like the Media Consultant by Trayvon Martin family attorneys has taken down his website.

Looks like the Trayvon scam may be unraveling a bit

Link
 
2012-05-04 04:55:18 PM
And you... Rapmaster2000... You are either "one of those" people that I was talking about earlier, or you are a black person who is incapable of considering violence against white people as a criminal act. I'm almost curious as to which of those is true.
 
2012-05-04 04:58:18 PM

AbortionsForAll: timujin: AbortionsForAll: You're insinuating that roving gangs of violent blacks attacking/victimizing white people all over the country as a result of this Trayvon Martin thing is not actually relevant

wait, hold on a second. I've seen one link where a bunch of black people spontaneously got together and beat up a white dude and are claimed to have said something about Trayvon afterward. Where are these "roving gangs"? Where else in the country have they attacked or victimized white people?

http://hamptonroads.com.nyud.net/2012/05/beating-church-and-brambleto n

http://globalgrind.com/news/Alton-L-Hayes-III-trayvon-martin-fight-De t ails

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46885491/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/us - teen-guilty-murdering-british-tourists/#.T4KFgO3fFcg

More..?


More? How about "some"? That first one wasn't "for Trayvon", the second is a dude, not a gang, and the third happened a year before the shooting and so, again, wasn't "for Trayvon". So, yeah, I'd like to see links to support "roving gangs of violent blacks attacking/victimizing white people all over the country as a result of this Trayvon Martin thing."

Seriously, if there's an epidemic of black on white crime due to the Trayvon Martin case, I'd be very interested to know about it.
 
2012-05-04 05:00:15 PM
Oh yeah, I can't believe I forgot this one!

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/30k-home-invasion-philadelphia-caught - camera-15978347
 
2012-05-04 05:01:07 PM

UCFRoadWarrior: There have been numerous articles regarding black on white crime, with Justice For Trayvon mentioned


Please then, post some. I've seen one so far, about a group of people who beat up a dude and then said something about "for Trayvon" and another about a couple of high school age kids who beat up another guy and later one said he'd done it because he was "upset about Trayvon." You and AbortionsForAll make it sound like there are dozens of these stories.
 
2012-05-04 05:01:09 PM

timujin: AbortionsForAll: timujin: AbortionsForAll: You're insinuating that roving gangs of violent blacks attacking/victimizing white people all over the country as a result of this Trayvon Martin thing is not actually relevant

wait, hold on a second. I've seen one link where a bunch of black people spontaneously got together and beat up a white dude and are claimed to have said something about Trayvon afterward. Where are these "roving gangs"? Where else in the country have they attacked or victimized white people?

http://hamptonroads.com.nyud.net/2012/05/beating-church-and-brambleto n

http://globalgrind.com/news/Alton-L-Hayes-III-trayvon-martin-fight-De t ails

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46885491/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/us - teen-guilty-murdering-british-tourists/#.T4KFgO3fFcg

More..?

More? How about "some"? That first one wasn't "for Trayvon", the second is a dude, not a gang, and the third happened a year before the shooting and so, again, wasn't "for Trayvon". So, yeah, I'd like to see links to support "roving gangs of violent blacks attacking/victimizing white people all over the country as a result of this Trayvon Martin thing."

Seriously, if there's an epidemic of black on white crime due to the Trayvon Martin case, I'd be very interested to know about it.


You asked for examples of roving blacks attacking whites. I provided them.
 
2012-05-04 05:01:28 PM

MagSeven: George is looking a little thuggish himself....


That's him on the far left, right?
 
2012-05-04 05:03:37 PM

timujin: UCFRoadWarrior: There have been numerous articles regarding black on white crime, with Justice For Trayvon mentioned

Please then, post some. I've seen one so far, about a group of people who beat up a dude and then said something about "for Trayvon" and another about a couple of high school age kids who beat up another guy and later one said he'd done it because he was "upset about Trayvon." You and AbortionsForAll make it sound like there are dozens of these stories.


Well, by your own admission, that's two (even though in the same sentence you said there was only one). There are more though. However I've got work to do before I head out so I'm done googling for now. One more thing: Do you honestly think that there aren't cases which were motivated by the Trayvon Martin thing but the attacker simply never stated as much? I mean if you think this, you're kidding yourself.

And if you really wanted to see examples of violent blacks taking vengeance for Trayvon, you could always open google and take a cursory look yourself (or do you actually not really want to see said examples?).
 
2012-05-04 05:04:31 PM

AbortionsForAll: And you... Rapmaster2000... You are either "one of those" people that I was talking about earlier, or you are a black person who is incapable of considering violence against white people as a criminal act. I'm almost curious as to which of those is true.


You know what? Never mind. You're truly an idiot. Dude tried to explain that the world is not populated by "people who face the racial reality" and people who are "either black or deny black on white violence." That sometimes stories like this just don't come up on people's radar. Not on his,because it's not something he has to deal with. Same with mine, it's not something that's going on where I live. But you are so wrapped up in that ideal, that the world is separated into those two camps, that it seems anyone who doesn't see things your way must see it the other.
 
2012-05-04 05:06:59 PM

AbortionsForAll: timujin: UCFRoadWarrior: There have been numerous articles regarding black on white crime, with Justice For Trayvon mentioned

Please then, post some. I've seen one so far, about a group of people who beat up a dude and then said something about "for Trayvon" and another about a couple of high school age kids who beat up another guy and later one said he'd done it because he was "upset about Trayvon." You and AbortionsForAll make it sound like there are dozens of these stories.

Well, by your own admission, that's two (even though in the same sentence you said there was only one). There are more though. However I've got work to do before I head out so I'm done googling for now. One more thing: Do you honestly think that there aren't cases which were motivated by the Trayvon Martin thing but the attacker simply never stated as much? I mean if you think this, you're kidding yourself.

And if you really wanted to see examples of violent blacks taking vengeance for Trayvon, you could always open google and take a cursory look yourself (or do you actually not really want to see said examples?).


I would take the exact opposite theory and say that these people are attacking others regardless and just using Trayvon as a convenient excuse. That's happened all throughout history with groups of all races. Find a polarizing event and use it for selfish ends.
 
2012-05-04 05:09:06 PM

AbortionsForAll: timujin: UCFRoadWarrior: There have been numerous articles regarding black on white crime, with Justice For Trayvon mentioned

Please then, post some. I've seen one so far, about a group of people who beat up a dude and then said something about "for Trayvon" and another about a couple of high school age kids who beat up another guy and later one said he'd done it because he was "upset about Trayvon." You and AbortionsForAll make it sound like there are dozens of these stories.

Well, by your own admission, that's two (even though in the same sentence you said there was only one). There are more though. However I've got work to do before I head out so I'm done googling for now. One more thing: Do you honestly think that there aren't cases which were motivated by the Trayvon Martin thing but the attacker simply never stated as much? I mean if you think this, you're kidding yourself.

And if you really wanted to see examples of violent blacks taking vengeance for Trayvon, you could always open google and take a cursory look yourself (or do you actually not really want to see said examples?).


No, it's one. A kid beating up another kid isn't a "gang". And this started because of claims made by you and UCFRoadWarrior, which you have yet to back up. I'm starting to think that's because you can't. Still, doesn't matter, for all the back and forth we go through, you'll never stop believing there's a race war brewing and I'll never stop believing you're an idiot and a liar.
 
2012-05-04 05:17:30 PM

skrewewe: Good to see that the media's attempt to make this whole Trayvon thing all about racism successful. Im sure it's KKK and Skin heads donating money to a fat mexican.


You know what? If that's the case then I'm all for it. They don't deserve money. Plus, there's irony in it so that's always awesome.
 
2012-05-04 05:18:06 PM

Oh_Enough_Already: Roving packs of blacks (i.e. "Flashrobs") have been intentionally targeting, attacking and robbing whites for several years in a row now, it's only recently that they're asserting it's Trayvon related.

Were the reverse true, and blacks were being targeted this way by whites, it would garner 24/7 international media attention.

Nonetheless, the ranks of "those who can see" is growing every day, and fewer and fewer people are willing to be silenced by political correctness and are openly talking about these things.

This will likely be the summer where Bernie Goetz gets talked about a lot as we have the perfect storm of record gun-ownership combined with record amounts of intentional black on white violence.


While it is true that the so-called "those who can see" group is growing, said people are such a tiny minority that they may as well be statistically insignificant. Persons such as you and myself (and UFCRoadWarrior) have legitimate reason to be very concerned. An example of our relative minority can be witnessed in any comment thread regarding the "Trayvon Martin" thing. You'll notice that 90% of white people (and 100% of black people) ignore eye-witness accounts of Zimmerman being physically assaulted before his weapon was even drawn (or they justify the attack because evidently looking at a black person is a blank check for a beating).

I've also been keenly aware of said "flashmobs" phenomenon. That said, I'm clearly only paying attention to such things because I have an unhealthy interest/obsession. Real (normal) people only pay attention to stock tickers and sports scores, evidently.
 
2012-05-04 05:20:06 PM

Oh_Enough_Already: Roving packs of blacks (i.e. "Flashrobs")


You have no idea what a "flashmob" is, Jethro.
 
2012-05-04 05:21:51 PM

AbortionsForAll: ignore eye-witness accounts of Zimmerman being physically assaulted before his weapon was even drawn


I think you're completely full of shiat, and a cockbrained liar to boot. Here's your chance to prove me wrong. Give us citations to some of these "eye witness reports."
 
2012-05-04 05:22:08 PM
Here's a link with another list of "Trayvon's Revenge" examples:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/wave-of-black-mobs-brutalizing-whites/
 
2012-05-04 05:23:22 PM

AbortionsForAll: That said, I'm clearly only paying attention to such things because I have an unhealthy interest/obsession. Real (normal) people only pay attention to stock tickers and sports scores, evidently.


Jesus, how do you leave the house feeling that high a level of victimization?
 
2012-05-04 05:23:46 PM

AbortionsForAll: I've also been keenly aware of said "flashmobs" phenomenon


This is a flashmob, geniuses:

upload.wikimedia.org

Gee, look at all the frightening black people.
 
2012-05-04 05:24:17 PM
(That last link has 10 examples, and that was just a cursory search)

Are you going to ignore those too? Please tell me how they aren't good enough for you and that you still don't believe it.
 
2012-05-04 05:25:28 PM

Mavent: AbortionsForAll: I've also been keenly aware of said "flashmobs" phenomenon

This is a flashmob, geniuses:

[upload.wikimedia.org image 320x240]

Gee, look at all the frightening black people.


Some examples of groups of blacks attacking whites in so-called "flashmobs":

http://www.redstate.com/msmils13/2011/09/17/why-is-the-media-whitewas h ing-black-flash-mob-violence/
 
2012-05-04 05:27:01 PM

AbortionsForAll: Here's a link with another list of "Trayvon's Revenge" examples:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/wave-of-black-mobs-brutalizing-whites/


Because nothing says "I'm certainly not a farking idiot" like a link to World News Daily.
 
2012-05-04 05:28:50 PM

Mavent: AbortionsForAll: Here's a link with another list of "Trayvon's Revenge" examples:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/wave-of-black-mobs-brutalizing-whites/

Because nothing says "I'm certainly not a farking idiot" like a link to World News Daily.


That link is a google result. Are you saying these events are fabricated because you dislike the site on which it is posted? I wouldn't be at all surprised if that's what you were saying. After all, this is fark.com and you (like almost all farkers) are probably an ultra-liberal fark-tard with his head in the sand.
 
2012-05-04 05:30:58 PM

UCFRoadWarrior: Looks like the Trayvon scam may be unraveling a bit


And what a scam it was! Have their unarmed, 17 year old, son followed and shot for simply being where he was legally entitled to be, so that they could profit!
 
2012-05-04 05:32:59 PM
AbortionsForAll: The point is that you're not a very self-aware individual. You came into this thread complaining about how unfair it is that the Pro-Zimmerman crowd is being characterized as "racist", and then you proceed to behave in an incredibly racist manner.

See, you're the one posting completely irrelevant links to articles about how horrible black people are. You. Not any of us. You, the guy whining about how unfair it is that we're calling you a racist. I have no idea how much clearer I could make it for you. It's as if we called you a clown, and you ran in the back room to throw on face paint and a rubber nose before indignantly insisting that you are not, in fact, a clown. I'm not even completely sure why I'm responding to you, since it seems likely that if we just left you to your own devices, you'd eventually post a link to Stormfront.com, and start tossing around the N word.
 
2012-05-04 05:35:39 PM

Mavent: AbortionsForAll: The point is that you're not a very self-aware individual. You came into this thread complaining about how unfair it is that the Pro-Zimmerman crowd is being characterized as "racist", and then you proceed to behave in an incredibly racist manner.

See, you're the one posting completely irrelevant links to articles about how horrible black people are. You. Not any of us. You, the guy whining about how unfair it is that we're calling you a racist. I have no idea how much clearer I could make it for you. It's as if we called you a clown, and you ran in the back room to throw on face paint and a rubber nose before indignantly insisting that you are not, in fact, a clown. I'm not even completely sure why I'm responding to you, since it seems likely that if we just left you to your own devices, you'd eventually post a link to Stormfront.com, and start tossing around the N word.


You must have missed the spot where I replied to someone else who said that black people have not taken violent vengeance for "Trayvon Martin".

You must have missed the sport where I replied to someone who said that "roving gangs" of violent blacks do not exist.

Seriously though, way to prove my *original* point entirely. You are accusing me of being a racist simply because I acknowledge documented facts. Thank you very very much for supporting my platform so effectively.
 
2012-05-04 05:36:50 PM

AbortionsForAll: Mavent: AbortionsForAll: The point is that you're not a very self-aware individual. You came into this thread complaining about how unfair it is that the Pro-Zimmerman crowd is being characterized as "racist", and then you proceed to behave in an incredibly racist manner.

See, you're the one posting completely irrelevant links to articles about how horrible black people are. You. Not any of us. You, the guy whining about how unfair it is that we're calling you a racist. I have no idea how much clearer I could make it for you. It's as if we called you a clown, and you ran in the back room to throw on face paint and a rubber nose before indignantly insisting that you are not, in fact, a clown. I'm not even completely sure why I'm responding to you, since it seems likely that if we just left you to your own devices, you'd eventually post a link to Stormfront.com, and start tossing around the N word.

You must have missed the spot where I replied to someone else who said that black people have not taken violent vengeance for "Trayvon Martin".

You must have missed the sport where I replied to someone who said that "roving gangs" of violent blacks do not exist.

Seriously though, way to prove my *original* point entirely. You are accusing me of being a racist simply because I acknowledge documented facts. Thank you very very much for supporting my platform so effectively.


Also, black people are racist because they complain about slavery.

How is that different from what you are saying right now?
 
2012-05-04 05:38:56 PM
Wow, when did fark get overrun by all these racist?
 
2012-05-04 05:42:55 PM

Meanniss: Wow, when did fark get overrun by all these racist?


Funny. Nobody actually said anything racist. People (namely myself) simply posted factual articles. If you believe that said articles portray black people a certain way, then CONGRATULATIONS! You can read articles about factual events!
 
2012-05-04 05:43:47 PM
www.styleite.com

BOO!


ha. morons.
 
2012-05-04 05:47:38 PM

AbortionsForAll: People (namely myself) simply posted factual articles.


At least one of your links was to a WND article. WND and factual have no business being in the same sentence.
 
2012-05-04 05:47:48 PM

cryinoutloud: [www.styleite.com image 300x300]

BOO!

ha. morons.


Are you suggesting that because you post a photo of a smirking black man, the above-noted instances of violent blacks beating white people within an inch of their lives (because they're white) is not something to be concerned about? I'm not sure I understand your meaning.
 
2012-05-04 05:49:05 PM

NightOwl2255: AbortionsForAll: People (namely myself) simply posted factual articles.

At least one of your links was to a WND article. WND and factual have no business being in the same sentence.


OK. What about the other ones? Particular the two with ten plus examples each?

And I just want to be clear here:

Are you saying that the wnd link is completely fabricated? Make sure you consider your response carefully, because you'll feel awfully stupid when I find independent verification of those events on a more "reputable" site.
 
2012-05-04 05:55:10 PM

AbortionsForAll: cryinoutloud: [www.styleite.com image 300x300]

BOO!

ha. morons.

Are you suggesting that because you post a photo of a smirking black man, the above-noted instances of violent blacks beating white people within an inch of their lives (because they're white) is not something to be concerned about? I'm not sure I understand your meaning.


What about the roving gangs of violent whites beating black people within an inch of their lives or killing them because they are black? Is that something to be concerned about? why aren't you complaining about that?

See people see that as a few idiot white people and not representative of all white people. However you want to take what a few black people have done and make it representative of all black people, and even worse you want to make it justification for the killing of an unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business.

This is why people think you are a disgusting racist.
 
2012-05-04 05:59:42 PM

ongbok: AbortionsForAll: cryinoutloud: [www.styleite.com image 300x300]

BOO!

ha. morons.

Are you suggesting that because you post a photo of a smirking black man, the above-noted instances of violent blacks beating white people within an inch of their lives (because they're white) is not something to be concerned about? I'm not sure I understand your meaning.

What about the roving gangs of violent whites beating black people within an inch of their lives or killing them because they are black? Is that something to be concerned about? why aren't you complaining about that?

See people see that as a few idiot white people and not representative of all white people. However you want to take what a few black people have done and make it representative of all black people, and even worse you want to make it justification for the killing of an unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business.

This is why people think you are a disgusting racist.


I'm not aware of any such cases happening in the past 50 years. Certainly nowhere near enough to indicate any sort of trend (unlike the opposite).

As for the "unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business:
You are one of those people I was talking about who conveniently pretends that there aren't eye-witnesses and evidence that he (Zimmerman) was being viciously attacked before he drew his weapon in legitimate defense of his life.

People think I'm a "disgusting racist" because people have been sufficiently indoctrinated to immediately brand any white person who talks honestly about racist black people attacking white people as a racist themselves.
 
2012-05-04 06:01:06 PM

Oh_Enough_Already: AbortionsForAll: NightOwl2255: AbortionsForAll: People (namely myself) simply posted factual articles.

At least one of your links was to a WND article. WND and factual have no business being in the same sentence.

OK. What about the other ones? Particular the two with ten plus examples each?

And I just want to be clear here:

Are you saying that the wnd link is completely fabricated? Make sure you consider your response carefully, because you'll feel awfully stupid when I find independent verification of those events on a more "reputable" site.

Don't waste your time, these folks pull out the "No True Scotsman" canard to discredit any information they don't like simply based on where it was posted or linked to.

The day Zimmerman made bail and there were a quarter million+ tweets from black folks calling for his death, the death of the judge, the death of his attorneys, etc (a story conspicuously avoided by the black=good, white=bad mainstream media, needless to say) people who couldn't believe what they were seeing started grumbling that "those must be fake accounts, set up by white people, to make black people look bad."

So, yeah, these are not exactly rational people we are dealing with, or folks who will have their opinions changed by facts.


...and they outnumber you 500 to 1. Feels good don't it? The kinda thing that makes you confident & safe in raising children in this country.
 
2012-05-04 06:05:01 PM

ongbok: AbortionsForAll: cryinoutloud:
What about the roving gangs of violent whites beating black people within an inch of their lives or killing them because they are black? Is that something to be concerned about? why aren't you complaining about that?

Roving bands of whites beating up blacks?
Is it too much to ask for that link?
I thought so.
 
2012-05-04 06:07:34 PM

politech: ongbok: AbortionsForAll: cryinoutloud:
What about the roving gangs of violent whites beating black people within an inch of their lives or killing them because they are black? Is that something to be concerned about? why aren't you complaining about that?

Roving bands of whites beating up blacks?
Is it too much to ask for that link?
I thought so.


No. Not at all, however it's not *my* job to provide said link. That would be your job (since you're the one advocating the concept that black people should be afraid of roving bands of racist white people attacking/killing them). By all means, please provide links. If you can come up with even half the amount that I can find of the opposite situation, I'll suck your dick.
 
2012-05-04 06:08:33 PM

AbortionsForAll: ongbok: AbortionsForAll: cryinoutloud: [www.styleite.com image 300x300]

BOO!

ha. morons.

Are you suggesting that because you post a photo of a smirking black man, the above-noted instances of violent blacks beating white people within an inch of their lives (because they're white) is not something to be concerned about? I'm not sure I understand your meaning.

What about the roving gangs of violent whites beating black people within an inch of their lives or killing them because they are black? Is that something to be concerned about? why aren't you complaining about that?

See people see that as a few idiot white people and not representative of all white people. However you want to take what a few black people have done and make it representative of all black people, and even worse you want to make it justification for the killing of an unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business.

This is why people think you are a disgusting racist.

I'm not aware of any such cases happening in the past 50 years. Certainly nowhere near enough to indicate any sort of trend (unlike the opposite).

As for the "unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business:
You are one of those people I was talking about who conveniently pretends that there aren't eye-witnesses and evidence that he (Zimmerman) was being viciously attacked before he drew his weapon in legitimate defense of his life.

People think I'm a "disgusting racist" because people have been sufficiently indoctrinated to immediately brand any white person who talks honestly about racist black people attacking white people as a racist themselves.


Google "black man attacked". Sheesh. I thought you were good at google!
 
2012-05-04 06:09:02 PM
Oh wait, I'm sorry! You were actually agreeing with me. Yes I see your sarcasm now. I was stuck in defensive mode. I'm sorry. But yes, your point is absolutely valid.
 
2012-05-04 06:09:21 PM

AbortionsForAll: Are you saying that the wnd link is completely fabricated? Make sure you consider your response carefully, because you'll feel awfully stupid when I find independent verification of those events on a more "reputable" site.


The fact is WND is a complete and utter BS site. Anyone linking to it loses credibility simply by doing so.
 
2012-05-04 06:11:05 PM

MagSeven: AbortionsForAll: ongbok: AbortionsForAll: cryinoutloud: [www.styleite.com image 300x300]

BOO!

ha. morons.

Are you suggesting that because you post a photo of a smirking black man, the above-noted instances of violent blacks beating white people within an inch of their lives (because they're white) is not something to be concerned about? I'm not sure I understand your meaning.

What about the roving gangs of violent whites beating black people within an inch of their lives or killing them because they are black? Is that something to be concerned about? why aren't you complaining about that?

See people see that as a few idiot white people and not representative of all white people. However you want to take what a few black people have done and make it representative of all black people, and even worse you want to make it justification for the killing of an unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business.

This is why people think you are a disgusting racist.

I'm not aware of any such cases happening in the past 50 years. Certainly nowhere near enough to indicate any sort of trend (unlike the opposite).

As for the "unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business:
You are one of those people I was talking about who conveniently pretends that there aren't eye-witnesses and evidence that he (Zimmerman) was being viciously attacked before he drew his weapon in legitimate defense of his life.

People think I'm a "disgusting racist" because people have been sufficiently indoctrinated to immediately brand any white person who talks honestly about racist black people attacking white people as a racist themselves.

Google "black man attacked". Sheesh. I thought you were good at google!


The burden would be on you to provide examples (kinda like how I provided about 30 examples of the opposite). Clearly you have no credibility whatsoever since you are either unwilling or unable to provide even one example of this imaginary phenominon of "groups of whites violently attacking blacks".
 
2012-05-04 06:12:24 PM

AbortionsForAll: politech: ongbok: AbortionsForAll: cryinoutloud:
No. Not at all, however it's not *my* job to provide said link. That would be your job (since you're the one advocating the concept that black people should be afraid of roving bands of racist white people attacking/killing them). By all means, please provide links. If you can come up with even half the amount that I can find of the opposite situation, I'll suck your dick.


Weasel words are weaselly.

I'm not advocating anything except for the race warriors to stop being such douche-nozzles.

But you ... you're just a farkin liar.
 
2012-05-04 06:12:37 PM

NightOwl2255: AbortionsForAll: Are you saying that the wnd link is completely fabricated? Make sure you consider your response carefully, because you'll feel awfully stupid when I find independent verification of those events on a more "reputable" site.

The fact is WND is a complete and utter BS site. Anyone linking to it loses credibility simply by doing so.


I'm sorry but you didn't answer my question. Are you saying that the events described in the wnd link are fabricated and in fact never actually happened? Are you saying that because wnd documented said events, they were magically erased from the space-time-continuum? We're at an impasse until you can answer this simple question and clarify your platform.
 
2012-05-04 06:14:07 PM

AbortionsForAll: MagSeven: AbortionsForAll: ongbok: AbortionsForAll: cryinoutloud: [www.styleite.com image 300x300]

BOO!

ha. morons.

Are you suggesting that because you post a photo of a smirking black man, the above-noted instances of violent blacks beating white people within an inch of their lives (because they're white) is not something to be concerned about? I'm not sure I understand your meaning.

What about the roving gangs of violent whites beating black people within an inch of their lives or killing them because they are black? Is that something to be concerned about? why aren't you complaining about that?

See people see that as a few idiot white people and not representative of all white people. However you want to take what a few black people have done and make it representative of all black people, and even worse you want to make it justification for the killing of an unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business.

This is why people think you are a disgusting racist.

I'm not aware of any such cases happening in the past 50 years. Certainly nowhere near enough to indicate any sort of trend (unlike the opposite).

As for the "unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business:
You are one of those people I was talking about who conveniently pretends that there aren't eye-witnesses and evidence that he (Zimmerman) was being viciously attacked before he drew his weapon in legitimate defense of his life.

People think I'm a "disgusting racist" because people have been sufficiently indoctrinated to immediately brand any white person who talks honestly about racist black people attacking white people as a racist themselves.

Google "black man attacked". Sheesh. I thought you were good at google!

The burden would be on you to provide examples (kinda like how I provided about 30 examples of the opposite). Clearly you have no credibility whatsoever since you are either unwilling or unable to provide even one example of this ima ...


Prove? Prove you refuse to copy paste "black man attacked" into google? I don't give a shiat if you do or don't. It's not my responsibility to prove you aren't a lazy, information cherry picking idiot that only sees the world in your own narrow minded way.
 
2012-05-04 06:15:22 PM

politech: AbortionsForAll: politech: ongbok: AbortionsForAll: cryinoutloud:
No. Not at all, however it's not *my* job to provide said link. That would be your job (since you're the one advocating the concept that black people should be afraid of roving bands of racist white people attacking/killing them). By all means, please provide links. If you can come up with even half the amount that I can find of the opposite situation, I'll suck your dick.

Weasel words are weaselly.

I'm not advocating anything except for the race warriors to stop being such douche-nozzles.

But you ... you're just a farkin liar.


What exactly did I lie about? I would very much like for you to point out one of my so-called lies. Please..? I am also interested in some clarification on what exactly my "weasel words" were, because I'm not aware of having actually conveyed any original thought. I merely referenced pre-existing documentation of factual examples of violent blacks attacking whites with racial motivations (with relative impunity).

I would seriously love it if just one of you could actually back up a single one of your attacks on me with any sort of logic or evidence of any kind.
 
2012-05-04 06:16:19 PM

MagSeven: AbortionsForAll: MagSeven: AbortionsForAll: ongbok: AbortionsForAll: cryinoutloud: [www.styleite.com image 300x300]

BOO!

ha. morons.

Are you suggesting that because you post a photo of a smirking black man, the above-noted instances of violent blacks beating white people within an inch of their lives (because they're white) is not something to be concerned about? I'm not sure I understand your meaning.

What about the roving gangs of violent whites beating black people within an inch of their lives or killing them because they are black? Is that something to be concerned about? why aren't you complaining about that?

See people see that as a few idiot white people and not representative of all white people. However you want to take what a few black people have done and make it representative of all black people, and even worse you want to make it justification for the killing of an unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business.

This is why people think you are a disgusting racist.

I'm not aware of any such cases happening in the past 50 years. Certainly nowhere near enough to indicate any sort of trend (unlike the opposite).

As for the "unarmed 17 year old who was doing nothing but minding his own business:
You are one of those people I was talking about who conveniently pretends that there aren't eye-witnesses and evidence that he (Zimmerman) was being viciously attacked before he drew his weapon in legitimate defense of his life.

People think I'm a "disgusting racist" because people have been sufficiently indoctrinated to immediately brand any white person who talks honestly about racist black people attacking white people as a racist themselves.

Google "black man attacked". Sheesh. I thought you were good at google!

The burden would be on you to provide examples (kinda like how I provided about 30 examples of the opposite). Clearly you have no credibility whatsoever since you are either unwilling or unable to provide even one ex ...


OK. Then I can write you off as background noise which carries no real meaning whatsoever. Fine with me. C-ya!
 
2012-05-04 06:16:40 PM

Oh_Enough_Already: MagSeven:

Google "black man attacked". Sheesh. I thought you were good at google!

That's a poor metric, as the media intentionally refuses to include or report upon the racial components or elements in black on white crime, as, if they did so, and write "Whites attacked by blacks" there would be peals of protests about how they were "promoting a stereotype," etc, etc, etc, when, in fact, they would simply be factually reporting on events.

Blacks attacking whites is a "dog bites man story."

Whites attacking blacks is a "man bites dog" story and, hence, will garner far more coverage.


Well in the examples Abortions for all provided, the media is certainly covering black on white crime, unless ABF wrote those stories himself.
 
Displayed 50 of 326 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report