by "mainstream media," i assume you mean fox news, the most popular - by far - news channel in america for ten years running, right?

Fox News IS the mainstream media.

Because it doesn't really matter? As long as no one else gave them material support or was aware of the plot, all they have in common is that they share a common cause. A cause that is perfectly legal to pursue through protest and other political means. Is there anyone out there who doesn't realize that left wing and right wing terrorists both exist as well as the religious zealots? There's nothing new here.

Because nobody cares what homeless people do.

Because the Cleveland bombers were more like meth-head losers than dirty hippies?

Because it is the sort of nonsensical crap that only groups like "Newsbusters" would pretend was journalism?

What's truly scary about this is how deep you have to go to really uncover this conspiracy. I know many of you haven't spent the decades I have perfecting your understanding of the science of numerology, and might have only applied a very casual number-based study to this incident and the nefarious truths it exposes. But my research goes deeper.

We'll start basic, with the word "OCCUPY". Number equivalents: O=7, C=3 (X2), U=6, P=8, Y=1. Total=28.

A meaningless number in this context. BUT! But, always a but. Add 2 and 8, you get 10. And who was the 10th president of the United States?

That's right, John Tyler.

Before we get to John Tyler, though, remember this crucial fact--numerology is only ever as accurate as the language it is decoding. The name of the actual movement is not "Occupy," but rather, "Occupy Wall Street." This is one of the ways they've escaped detection as long as they have--by popularizing a shorthand version of their name. Let's add in WALL (6+1+3+3=13) and STREET (3+4+2+5+5+4=23) and bring the total weight of the term to 64.

You will note, of course, that 6+4=10. Which brings us right back, once again, to John Tyler.

Here's the equation for John Tyler's name: 4+1+3+5+2+1+7+5+5=33. And I know what you're doing now. You're looking at the first number, 64, and this number 33, and thinking: that's farking meaningless. Why the fark are you wasting my name, Pocket Ninja?

BUT YOU'RE FORGETTING ONE CRUCIAL THING: John Tyler had no middle name.

I'm farking serious about this. Look it up. The man had no middle name. And here's another reason this connection has so long escaped us: many scientists attempting a numerological reading simply saw no middle initial and said, "what the heck, guess there's no number." But a "no alphabet" result in true numerology always get a weight of 9. That's right...the numerological significance of John Tyler's name is NOT 33, it's 42.

Now are you starting to see? Take 42 and subtract it from our original number, 64. See that 22? Now, divide it in half to reflect the two original sources.

11.

Now go here. And let the true horror commence.

The Occupy movement is mentioned in the third paragraph of the first link Fuddbusters provides as "proof."

Why does the mainstream MSM media refuse to mention OWS sooner than the third paragraph even though right-wing bloggers want them to?

This just goes to show you kids, don't bomb your bridges if you want another job in your field.

vpb: Because it is the sort of nonsensical crap that only groups like "Newsbusters" would pretend was journalism?

100% Yellow Journalism, All the Time

Pocket Ninja: What's truly scary about this is how deep you have to go to really uncover this conspiracy. I know many of you haven't spent the decades I have perfecting your understanding of the science of numerology, and might have only applied a very casual number-based study to this incident and the nefarious truths it exposes. ....

Not having a middle name is unnatural, and you have to be a natural born citizen to be president so Tyler must have been a secret muslin terrorist black man, out to destroy Mareka.

I can't take any guy whose picture is sepia toned seriously.

Pocket Ninja: That's right, John Tyler.

But what about Tippecanoe?

Pocket Ninja:

When is your book coming out so I can pre-order?

Geotpf: SomethingWitty84: Because the bombers had an agenda, and Occupy doesn't, and that contradiction would make a new reporter's head explode.

I like this answer.

Seriously, what the fark is the point of the Occupy protests? They seem to be protesting for the sake of protesting, intentionally avoiding any specific, tangible point or cause.

Geotpf: SomethingWitty84: Because the bombers had an agenda, and Occupy doesn't, and that contradiction would make a new reporter's head explode.

I like this answer.

Seriously, what the fark is the point of the Occupy protests? They seem to be protesting for the sake of protesting, intentionally avoiding any specific, tangible point or cause.

Yes.

Unless you're like ALEC and actually write legislation and hand it off to your paid congressman, you aren't being specific enough and have not right to protest the general condition of the US economy.

Is that the 'journalists' real photo? What a tool.

FarkedOver: Maybe because the FBI in this case was acting as an agent provocateur. The original plan called for smoke bombs to be set off as a diversionary act in order to deface banks. Then once the FBI got involved, there was talk of explosives on federal land..... Yeah.... I smell entrapment.

Oh, is the FBI foiling its own terrorist plots again? Has it been a couple months already?

At least they've made progress by choosing white mentally unstable patsies to manipulate, instead of the usual brown colored ones.