If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNBC)   Stockblocked   (cnbc.com) divider line 12
    More: Fail, employee compensation, fiduciary duties, stock splits, Sergey Brin  
•       •       •

3820 clicks; posted to Business » on 01 May 2012 at 3:28 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



12 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-05-01 02:35:14 PM
I think Google will win this one

I mean, they have more money to bribe more judges. It is a simple case of mathematics
 
2012-05-01 03:53:52 PM
Damn, that is pretty cheeky on Google's part, though - essentially screwing all other stockholders to give billions to and entrench two controlling stockholders.

So much for that whole "don't be evil" bit, eh?
 
2012-05-01 03:54:00 PM
Page and Brin "wish to retain this power, while selling off large amounts of their stockholdings, and reaping billions of dollars in proceeds," said the complaint,

Which is waaay different than the other Google stock holders...
 
2012-05-01 04:08:21 PM
Why don't the co-founders just issue more bonds if they want to capitalize on their brand? They already have 56.3%.

Or they could do a stock buyback of, say, 5% outstanding shares, and roll that into a preferred stock or something.

The non-voting share scheme is beyond retarded.
 
2012-05-01 05:23:06 PM
Let's see. You are Page and Brin. Business is good, but you need to raise some cash for some planned acquisitions and restructurings. At the same time, you don't want to dilute your personal stakes down to a point that a well organized outsider could steal your company. There are a couple of ways to accomplish it. This "stock split" is one of the sloppier ways to do it. If you are going to issue a subordinate class of stock, be honest about it and say so.
 
2012-05-01 06:39:12 PM
mainstreet62: Why don't the co-founders just issue more bonds if they want to capitalize on their brand? They already have 56.3%.

Or they could do a stock buyback of, say, 5% outstanding shares, and roll that into a preferred stock or something.

The non-voting share scheme is beyond retarded.


Why pay bondholders, when you can screw shareholders instead?
 
2012-05-01 11:06:36 PM
Google could cure cancer, and still people would complain. What's up with this?
 
2012-05-01 11:17:19 PM
Page and Brin have done nothing but fark Google sideways since begging Schmidt to step down
 
2012-05-02 12:35:40 AM
You know what? If you're a Google stockholder, you should just enjoy your gains. My stock portfolio is down no matter what time frame you use, so kindly STFU and enjoy your great returns, dickheads.
 
2012-05-02 05:23:43 AM
stiletto_the_wise: You know what? If you're a Google stockholder, you should just enjoy your gains. My stock portfolio is down no matter what time frame you use, so kindly STFU and enjoy your great returns, dickheads.

Translation: "Let them eat cake."
 
2012-05-02 08:33:03 AM
This share class nonsense is exactly how the Murdoch family have retained majority voting power while having a sliver of the shares.

News Corp isn't exactly a model you can follow can claim to be ethical.
 
2012-05-02 10:47:45 AM
digistil: Translation: "Let them eat cake."

Wha?? I could see them biatching if they were losing money hand over fist, but the company is super-successful and providing a great return. Why complain?
 
Displayed 12 of 12 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report