Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Ace Showbiz)   Chloe Moretz: Carrie remake will be like Black Swan. So lesbian sex with pig blood then   (aceshowbiz.com) divider line 136
    More: Scary, Brian De Palma, remakes, pigs, blood, lesbians, Julianne Moore  
•       •       •

4866 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 30 Apr 2012 at 12:07 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



136 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-04-30 08:16:37 AM  
Chloe, THEY'RE ALL GONNA LAUGH AT YOU!
 
2012-04-30 08:57:28 AM  
i832.photobucket.com

/couldn't resist
 
2012-04-30 09:32:10 AM  
"It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm
 
2012-04-30 10:34:47 AM  

Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm


I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?
 
2012-04-30 10:57:26 AM  
Fark: The Movie is getting passed over for this!?
 
2012-04-30 11:10:32 AM  
I'm in my 40s and I was six years old in 1976. It was a LONG TIME AGO. That's like two generations ago. I can't see today's teens hip to Travolta's studman today.
 
2012-04-30 11:11:29 AM  
Did none of you own VHS in the 80s?
 
2012-04-30 11:14:14 AM  

Generation_D: Did none of you own VHS in the 80s?


My family only did Betamax. We were hipsters before it was hip.
 
2012-04-30 11:18:46 AM  

I_Am_Weasel: Fark: The Movie is getting passed over for this!?


Neil Patrick Harris declined the offer to play me, citing scheduling conflicts.
 
2012-04-30 11:21:16 AM  

Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?



Well it was 36 years ago. The whole premise of Back to the Future was how different things were only 30 years ago. There could be a scene with the kid with the Justin Bieber haircut who's wearing his antiquated Star Wars shirt ironically is tweeting on his iPhone about the batshiat crazy biatch throwing things around with her mind like she just escaped from Azkaban. No one in 1976 would know WTF he was doing. And John Travolta was a teen heartthrob and not the closeted Scientologist from Pulp Fiction.
 
2012-04-30 11:25:33 AM  

Mugato: Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?


Well it was 36 years ago. The whole premise of Back to the Future was how different things were only 30 years ago. There could be a scene with the kid with the Justin Bieber haircut who's wearing his antiquated Star Wars shirt ironically is tweeting on his iPhone about the batshiat crazy biatch throwing things around with her mind like she just escaped from Azkaban. No one in 1976 would know WTF he was doing. And John Travolta was a teen heartthrob and not the closeted Scientologist from Pulp Fiction.


I get it. Her phrasing was weird though. It's an updated version simply because it's being redone in a contemporary setting. It's not like there's much to do to update it by design other than filming it today with today's actors and cultural references.
 
2012-04-30 11:28:15 AM  

Diogenes: I get it. Her phrasing was weird though. It's an updated version simply because it's being redone in a contemporary setting. It's not like there's much to do to update it by design other than filming it today with today's actors and cultural references.


She's just trying to convince everyone that it's not a completely unnecessary remake.
 
2012-04-30 11:34:16 AM  

Mugato: Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?


Well it was 36 years ago. The whole premise of Back to the Future was how different things were only 30 years ago. There could be a scene with the kid with the Justin Bieber haircut who's wearing his antiquated Star Wars shirt ironically is tweeting on his iPhone about the batshiat crazy biatch throwing things around with her mind like she just escaped from Azkaban. No one in 1976 would know WTF he was doing. And John Travolta was a teen heartthrob and not the closeted Scientologist from Pulp Fiction.


*shrug*. When I think 'modern era,' I think of anything after 1960.
 
2012-04-30 11:53:21 AM  

Cythraul: *shrug*. When I think 'modern era,' I think of anything after 1960.


That makes you sound very very old. When I was growing up in the 1980s, I didn't look to 1930 as my vantage point.
 
2012-04-30 11:56:55 AM  

Confabulat: Cythraul: *shrug*. When I think 'modern era,' I think of anything after 1960.

That makes you sound very very old. When I was growing up in the 1980s, I didn't look to 1930 as my vantage point.


I'm 33. Is that 'very very old?' If not, then I guess I'm just weird.
 
2012-04-30 12:12:56 PM  
... and Black Swan was a remake of Perfect Blue. Talk about derivative.
 
2012-04-30 12:13:59 PM  

Mugato: Diogenes: I get it. Her phrasing was weird though. It's an updated version simply because it's being redone in a contemporary setting. It's not like there's much to do to update it by design other than filming it today with today's actors and cultural references.

She's just trying to convince everyone that it's not a completely unnecessary remake.


They did do a Carrie set in modern times, it was called The Rage: Carrie 2 and it was meh. However the original Carrie wasn't all that great, aside from the gotcha ending, it's not like the original movie was so perfect that they shouldn't try to re-make it.
 
2012-04-30 12:14:22 PM  

Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?


Tv shows and movies from as recent as the early 90s suffer from "the mobile phone problem" where the entire plot would be screwed up if any of the characters had mobile phones or internet access.
 
2012-04-30 12:14:39 PM  
4.bp.blogspot.com
What?
 
2012-04-30 12:17:54 PM  
Black Swan was an incredible movie. It was basically a Dario Argento movie on crack. And it was awesome.
 
2012-04-30 12:22:07 PM  
Chloe Moretz?

pants ... getting ... tighter ...
 
2012-04-30 12:22:23 PM  

swahnhennessy: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 471x680]
What?


Yeah... a psychic high-school pirate movie. Chloe will be playing the Tyrone Power part.

MIchael Cera will do the Maureen O'Hara part.

and Neil Patrick Harris will be Anthony Quinn.


I'll get the tickets, you get the popcorn.
 
2012-04-30 12:24:42 PM  
29.media.tumblr.com
 
2012-04-30 12:30:15 PM  

Confabulat: I'm in my 40s and I was six years old in 1976. It was a LONG TIME AGO. That's like two generations ago. I can't see today's teens hip to Travolta's studman today.


9/11 changed everything. EVERYTHING!!
 
2012-04-30 12:30:26 PM  
So lesbian sex with pig blood then...

Or as I call it, "Wednesday afternoons and Sunday mornings."
 
2012-04-30 12:32:53 PM  

AeAe: Chloe Moretz?

pants ... getting ... tighter ...


Easy, there, tiger...
www.blogcdn.com...you caught the part where she's 15?
 
2012-04-30 12:40:01 PM  

LonMead: AeAe: Chloe Moretz?

pants ... getting ... tighter ...

Easy, there, tiger...
[www.blogcdn.com image 167x250]...you caught the part where she's 15?


Oh, well, in that case
memedepot.com
 
2012-04-30 12:41:13 PM  
Sigh . . . having a seat right over there.
 
2012-04-30 12:44:13 PM  
FTFA: ""I'm actually not looking at the original, even though De Palma's movie was one of the best movies ever made."

How do you know that if you haven't seen it?
 
mhd
2012-04-30 12:44:59 PM  
We've been through this before.
 
2012-04-30 12:49:14 PM  
I'd rather see her in a remake of Lolita, but... where, over there?
 
2012-04-30 12:51:02 PM  

Forgot_my_password_again: FTFA: ""I'm actually not looking at the original, even though De Palma's movie was one of the best movies ever made."

How do you know that if you haven't seen it?


Because she's looking at De Palma's best movie, and extrapolating from there that Carrie must still be on top of the rest of cinema by association.

www.phantomoftheparadise.ca
 
2012-04-30 12:52:30 PM  

Forgot_my_password_again: FTFA: ""I'm actually not looking at the original, even though De Palma's movie was one of the best movies ever made."

How do you know that if you haven't seen it?


She didn't say she hasn't seen it. She said she isn't looking at it for inspiration for her version.
 
2012-04-30 12:56:35 PM  

swahnhennessy: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 471x680]
What?


4.bp.blogspot.com

It's an anime based on a novel..

Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*
 
2012-04-30 12:57:59 PM  

Confabulat: I'm in my 40s and I was six years old in 1976. It was a LONG TIME AGO. That's like two generations ago. I can't see today's teens hip to Travolta's studman today.


I was 2 in 1976. And yeah it seems like a million years ago.
 
2012-04-30 12:58:05 PM  

Lumbar Puncture: Mugato: Diogenes: I get it. Her phrasing was weird though. It's an updated version simply because it's being redone in a contemporary setting. It's not like there's much to do to update it by design other than filming it today with today's actors and cultural references.

She's just trying to convince everyone that it's not a completely unnecessary remake.

They did do a Carrie set in modern times, it was called The Rage: Carrie 2 and it was meh. However the original Carrie wasn't all that great, aside from the gotcha ending, it's not like the original movie was so perfect that they shouldn't try to re-make it.


they already remade Carrie in modern times.

upload.wikimedia.org


it is better than the original movie, closer to the book and holds up well. While I am going to watch Chloe in the new one because she is awesome.... Carrie doesn't need another remake.

Carth: Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?

Tv shows and movies from as recent as the early 90s suffer from "the mobile phone problem" where the entire plot would be screwed up if any of the characters had mobile phones or internet access.


Seinfeld has that damn problem. It is sometimes hard to watch that show now, as much as I love it, because a cell phone would end most episodes in like 4 minutes.
 
2012-04-30 01:00:19 PM  

Zombie Eater: Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*


I'd go for a remake of Firestarter.

Stand By Me is fine the way it is.
 
2012-04-30 01:01:34 PM  

Zombie Eater: swahnhennessy: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 471x680]
What?

[4.bp.blogspot.com image 575x354]

It's an anime based on a novel..

Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*


Salem's Lot has been remade. The remake is EXCELLENT and makes the original crapfest movie look like the turd it is. Pet Semetary NEEDS a remake. That movie could be SOOO damn good now, and I love the original... but I could use a version with 100 percent less Tasha Yar. She is just so terrible in that film. Christine is another King work that is crying out for a remake. The original holds up pretty well, but it really needs an update that holds closer to the incredible novel.
 
2012-04-30 01:02:49 PM  

LonMead: swahnhennessy: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 471x680]
What?

Yeah... a psychic high-school pirate movie. Chloe will be playing the Tyrone Power part.

MIchael Cera will do the Maureen O'Hara part.

and Neil Patrick Harris will be Anthony Quinn.

I'll get the tickets, you get the popcorn.



But who plays Captain Morgan? WHO?
 
2012-04-30 01:04:28 PM  
Since this is a Stephen King thread. The Dark Tower needs to be an HBO series.
 
2012-04-30 01:05:51 PM  

Lumbar Puncture: Zombie Eater: Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*

I'd go for a remake of Firestarter.

Stand By Me is fine the way it is.


actually... that is one that really doesn't need a remake. the original holds up pretty well and is almost word for word the novel. the only reason to remake it now would be to make it more gruesome.
 
2012-04-30 01:06:40 PM  

Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm


Considering how old she is, 1976 *is* like the colonial times.

/Fark, I'm old....
 
2012-04-30 01:07:15 PM  

Forgot_my_password_again: FTFA: ""I'm actually not looking at the original, even though De Palma's movie was one of the best movies ever made."

How do you know that if you haven't seen it?


She didn't say she hasn't seen it. She said she's not looking at it, as in it's not what she will base her film on.
 
2012-04-30 01:07:16 PM  

frepnog: Christine is another King work that is crying out for a remake. The original holds up pretty well, but it really needs an update that holds closer to the incredible novel.


But if it was made today I guarantee that the car will be some new roll out model as an advertisement and not a 59 Fury.
 
2012-04-30 01:07:27 PM  

Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?


I was born in 1976 and suddenly feel paleolithic due to those remarks
 
2012-04-30 01:07:29 PM  

frepnog: Zombie Eater: swahnhennessy: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 471x680]
What?

[4.bp.blogspot.com image 575x354]

It's an anime based on a novel..

Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*

Salem's Lot has been remade. The remake is EXCELLENT and makes the original crapfest movie look like the turd it is. Pet Semetary NEEDS a remake. That movie could be SOOO damn good now, and I love the original... but I could use a version with 100 percent less Tasha Yar. She is just so terrible in that film. Christine is another King work that is crying out for a remake. The original holds up pretty well, but it really needs an update that holds closer to the incredible novel.



www.horrortalk.com

I am LITERALLY going to stake you and chop off your head.
 
2012-04-30 01:08:14 PM  

Cythraul: Confabulat: Cythraul: *shrug*. When I think 'modern era,' I think of anything after 1960.

That makes you sound very very old. When I was growing up in the 1980s, I didn't look to 1930 as my vantage point.

I'm 33. Is that 'very very old?' If not, then I guess I'm just weird.


I didn't know you were called Dennis
 
2012-04-30 01:09:07 PM  

Surool: ... and Black Swan was a remake of Perfect Blue. Talk about derivative.


But they integrated far more angles into the story.
 
2012-04-30 01:10:39 PM  

frepnog: Lumbar Puncture: Zombie Eater: Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*

I'd go for a remake of Firestarter.

Stand By Me is fine the way it is.

actually... that is one that really doesn't need a remake. the original holds up pretty well and is almost word for word the novel. the only reason to remake it now would be to make it more gruesome.


Till they break out the papier-mâché fireballs at the end.
 
2012-04-30 01:12:19 PM  
Don't forget the musical:

broadwayworld.com
 
Displayed 50 of 136 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report