FARK.com: (7078398) Chloe Moretz: Carrie remake will be like Black Swan. So lesbian sex with pig blood then

If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

		Chloe Moretz: Carrie remake will be like Black Swan. So lesbian sex with pig blood then (aceshowbiz.com)		136
		More: Scary, Brian De Palma, remakes, pigs, blood, lesbians, Julianne Moore

• • •

4850 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 30 Apr 2012 at 12:07 PM | Favorite | share:

Share this link:

URL:

http://fark.com/go/7078398

Bookmark:

Article Comments close

136 Comments (+0 »)

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

Sybarite		2012-04-30 08:16:37 AM

Chloe, THEY'RE ALL GONNA LAUGH AT YOU!

Slaxl		2012-04-30 08:57:28 AM

/couldn't resist

Diogenes		2012-04-30 09:32:10 AM

"It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

Cythraul		2012-04-30 10:34:47 AM

Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?

I_Am_Weasel		2012-04-30 10:57:26 AM

Fark: The Movie is getting passed over for this!?

Confabulat		2012-04-30 11:10:32 AM

I'm in my 40s and I was six years old in 1976. It was a LONG TIME AGO. That's like two generations ago. I can't see today's teens hip to Travolta's studman today.

Generation_D		2012-04-30 11:11:29 AM

Did none of you own VHS in the 80s?

Cythraul		2012-04-30 11:14:14 AM

Generation_D: Did none of you own VHS in the 80s?

My family only did Betamax. We were hipsters before it was hip.

Diogenes		2012-04-30 11:18:46 AM

I_Am_Weasel: Fark: The Movie is getting passed over for this!?

Neil Patrick Harris declined the offer to play me, citing scheduling conflicts.

Mugato		2012-04-30 11:21:16 AM

Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?

Well it was 36 years ago. The whole premise of Back to the Future was how different things were only 30 years ago. There could be a scene with the kid with the Justin Bieber haircut who's wearing his antiquated Star Wars shirt ironically is tweeting on his iPhone about the batshiat crazy biatch throwing things around with her mind like she just escaped from Azkaban. No one in 1976 would know WTF he was doing. And John Travolta was a teen heartthrob and not the closeted Scientologist from Pulp Fiction.

Diogenes		2012-04-30 11:25:33 AM

Mugato: Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?

Well it was 36 years ago. The whole premise of Back to the Future was how different things were only 30 years ago. There could be a scene with the kid with the Justin Bieber haircut who's wearing his antiquated Star Wars shirt ironically is tweeting on his iPhone about the batshiat crazy biatch throwing things around with her mind like she just escaped from Azkaban. No one in 1976 would know WTF he was doing. And John Travolta was a teen heartthrob and not the closeted Scientologist from Pulp Fiction.

I get it. Her phrasing was weird though. It's an updated version simply because it's being redone in a contemporary setting. It's not like there's much to do to update it by design other than filming it today with today's actors and cultural references.

Mugato		2012-04-30 11:28:15 AM

Diogenes: I get it. Her phrasing was weird though. It's an updated version simply because it's being redone in a contemporary setting. It's not like there's much to do to update it by design other than filming it today with today's actors and cultural references.

She's just trying to convince everyone that it's not a completely unnecessary remake.

Cythraul		2012-04-30 11:34:16 AM

Mugato: Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?

Well it was 36 years ago. The whole premise of Back to the Future was how different things were only 30 years ago. There could be a scene with the kid with the Justin Bieber haircut who's wearing his antiquated Star Wars shirt ironically is tweeting on his iPhone about the batshiat crazy biatch throwing things around with her mind like she just escaped from Azkaban. No one in 1976 would know WTF he was doing. And John Travolta was a teen heartthrob and not the closeted Scientologist from Pulp Fiction.

*shrug*. When I think 'modern era,' I think of anything after 1960.

Confabulat		2012-04-30 11:53:21 AM

Cythraul: *shrug*. When I think 'modern era,' I think of anything after 1960.

That makes you sound very very old. When I was growing up in the 1980s, I didn't look to 1930 as my vantage point.

Cythraul		2012-04-30 11:56:55 AM

Confabulat: Cythraul: *shrug*. When I think 'modern era,' I think of anything after 1960.

That makes you sound very very old. When I was growing up in the 1980s, I didn't look to 1930 as my vantage point.

I'm 33. Is that 'very very old?' If not, then I guess I'm just weird.

Surool		2012-04-30 12:12:56 PM

... and Black Swan was a remake of Perfect Blue. Talk about derivative.

Lumbar Puncture		2012-04-30 12:13:59 PM

Mugato: Diogenes: I get it. Her phrasing was weird though. It's an updated version simply because it's being redone in a contemporary setting. It's not like there's much to do to update it by design other than filming it today with today's actors and cultural references.

She's just trying to convince everyone that it's not a completely unnecessary remake.

They did do a Carrie set in modern times, it was called The Rage: Carrie 2 and it was meh. However the original Carrie wasn't all that great, aside from the gotcha ending, it's not like the original movie was so perfect that they shouldn't try to re-make it.

Carth		2012-04-30 12:14:22 PM

Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?

Tv shows and movies from as recent as the early 90s suffer from "the mobile phone problem" where the entire plot would be screwed up if any of the characters had mobile phones or internet access.

swahnhennessy		2012-04-30 12:14:39 PM

What?

Tatsuma		2012-04-30 12:17:54 PM

Black Swan was an incredible movie. It was basically a Dario Argento movie on crack. And it was awesome.

AeAe		2012-04-30 12:22:07 PM

Chloe Moretz?

pants ... getting ... tighter ...

LonMead		2012-04-30 12:22:23 PM

swahnhennessy: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 471x680]
What?

Yeah... a psychic high-school pirate movie. Chloe will be playing the Tyrone Power part.

MIchael Cera will do the Maureen O'Hara part.

_{and Neil Patrick Harris will be Anthony Quinn.}

I'll get the tickets, you get the popcorn.

fisker		2012-04-30 12:24:42 PM

BilltheThrill		2012-04-30 12:30:15 PM

Confabulat: I'm in my 40s and I was six years old in 1976. It was a LONG TIME AGO. That's like two generations ago. I can't see today's teens hip to Travolta's studman today.

9/11 changed everything. EVERYTHING!!

Uzzah		2012-04-30 12:30:26 PM

So lesbian sex with pig blood then...

Or as I call it, "Wednesday afternoons and Sunday mornings."

LonMead		2012-04-30 12:32:53 PM

AeAe: Chloe Moretz?

pants ... getting ... tighter ...

Easy, there, tiger...
www.blogcdn.com

...you caught the part where she's 15?

Ed Grubermann		2012-04-30 12:40:01 PM

LonMead: AeAe: Chloe Moretz?

pants ... getting ... tighter ...

Easy, there, tiger...
[www.blogcdn.com image 167x250]...you caught the part where she's 15?

Oh, well, in that case
memedepot.com

frodokb		2012-04-30 12:41:13 PM

Sigh . . . having a seat right over there.

Forgot_my_password_again		2012-04-30 12:44:13 PM

FTFA: ""I'm actually not looking at the original, even though De Palma's movie was one of the best movies ever made."

How do you know that if you haven't seen it?

mhd		2012-04-30 12:44:59 PM

We've been through this before.

GoHomeAndGetYourShinebox		2012-04-30 12:49:14 PM

I'd rather see her in a remake of Lolita, but... where, over there?

evilmrsock		2012-04-30 12:51:02 PM

Forgot_my_password_again: FTFA: ""I'm actually not looking at the original, even though De Palma's movie was one of the best movies ever made."

How do you know that if you haven't seen it?

Because she's looking at De Palma's best movie, and extrapolating from there that Carrie must still be on top of the rest of cinema by association.

www.phantomoftheparadise.ca

Carth		2012-04-30 12:52:30 PM

Forgot_my_password_again: FTFA: ""I'm actually not looking at the original, even though De Palma's movie was one of the best movies ever made."

How do you know that if you haven't seen it?

She didn't say she hasn't seen it. She said she isn't looking at it for inspiration for her version.

Zombie Eater		2012-04-30 12:56:35 PM

swahnhennessy: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 471x680]
What?

It's an anime based on a novel..

Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*

groppet		2012-04-30 12:57:59 PM

Confabulat: I'm in my 40s and I was six years old in 1976. It was a LONG TIME AGO. That's like two generations ago. I can't see today's teens hip to Travolta's studman today.

I was 2 in 1976. And yeah it seems like a million years ago.

frepnog		2012-04-30 12:58:05 PM

Lumbar Puncture: Mugato: Diogenes: I get it. Her phrasing was weird though. It's an updated version simply because it's being redone in a contemporary setting. It's not like there's much to do to update it by design other than filming it today with today's actors and cultural references.

She's just trying to convince everyone that it's not a completely unnecessary remake.

They did do a Carrie set in modern times, it was called The Rage: Carrie 2 and it was meh. However the original Carrie wasn't all that great, aside from the gotcha ending, it's not like the original movie was so perfect that they shouldn't try to re-make it.

they already remade Carrie in modern times.

upload.wikimedia.org

it is better than the original movie, closer to the book and holds up well. While I am going to watch Chloe in the new one because she is awesome.... Carrie doesn't need another remake.

Carth: Cythraul: Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

I was thinking the same thing. What is 1976? Bronze age, or something?

Tv shows and movies from as recent as the early 90s suffer from "the mobile phone problem" where the entire plot would be screwed up if any of the characters had mobile phones or internet access.

Seinfeld has that damn problem. It is sometimes hard to watch that show now, as much as I love it, because a cell phone would end most episodes in like 4 minutes.

Lumbar Puncture		2012-04-30 01:00:19 PM

Zombie Eater: Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*

I'd go for a remake of Firestarter.

Stand By Me is fine the way it is.

frepnog		2012-04-30 01:01:34 PM

Zombie Eater: swahnhennessy: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 471x680]
What?

[4.bp.blogspot.com image 575x354]

It's an anime based on a novel..

Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*

Salem's Lot has been remade. The remake is EXCELLENT and makes the original crapfest movie look like the turd it is. Pet Semetary NEEDS a remake. That movie could be SOOO damn good now, and I love the original... but I could use a version with 100 percent less Tasha Yar. She is just so terrible in that film. Christine is another King work that is crying out for a remake. The original holds up pretty well, but it really needs an update that holds closer to the incredible novel.

Pants_Optional		2012-04-30 01:02:49 PM

LonMead: swahnhennessy: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 471x680]
What?

Yeah... a psychic high-school pirate movie. Chloe will be playing the Tyrone Power part.

MIchael Cera will do the Maureen O'Hara part.

and Neil Patrick Harris will be Anthony Quinn.

I'll get the tickets, you get the popcorn.

But who plays Captain Morgan? WHO?

Carth		2012-04-30 01:04:28 PM

Since this is a Stephen King thread. The Dark Tower needs to be an HBO series.

frepnog		2012-04-30 01:05:51 PM

Lumbar Puncture: Zombie Eater: Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*

I'd go for a remake of Firestarter.

Stand By Me is fine the way it is.

actually... that is one that really doesn't need a remake. the original holds up pretty well and is almost word for word the novel. the only reason to remake it now would be to make it more gruesome.

imgod2u		2012-04-30 01:06:40 PM

Diogenes: "It's set in modern time, so it's a lot different."

Whereas the 1976 original was set in colonial time.

/facepalm

Considering how old she is, 1976 *is* like the colonial times.

/Fark, I'm old....

SharkTrager		2012-04-30 01:07:15 PM

Forgot_my_password_again: FTFA: ""I'm actually not looking at the original, even though De Palma's movie was one of the best movies ever made."

How do you know that if you haven't seen it?

She didn't say she hasn't seen it. She said she's not looking at it, as in it's not what she will base her film on.

Saiga410		2012-04-30 01:07:16 PM

frepnog: Christine is another King work that is crying out for a remake. The original holds up pretty well, but it really needs an update that holds closer to the incredible novel.

But if it was made today I guarantee that the car will be some new roll out model as an advertisement and not a 59 Fury.

loonatic112358		2012-04-30 01:07:27 PM

Sybarite		2012-04-30 01:07:29 PM

frepnog: Zombie Eater: swahnhennessy: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 471x680]
What?

[4.bp.blogspot.com image 575x354]

It's an anime based on a novel..

Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*

Salem's Lot has been remade. The remake is EXCELLENT and makes the original crapfest movie look like the turd it is. Pet Semetary NEEDS a remake. That movie could be SOOO damn good now, and I love the original... but I could use a version with 100 percent less Tasha Yar. She is just so terrible in that film. Christine is another King work that is crying out for a remake. The original holds up pretty well, but it really needs an update that holds closer to the incredible novel.

www.horrortalk.com

I am LITERALLY going to stake you and chop off your head.

Your Zionist Leader		2012-04-30 01:08:14 PM

Cythraul: Confabulat: Cythraul: *shrug*. When I think 'modern era,' I think of anything after 1960.

That makes you sound very very old. When I was growing up in the 1980s, I didn't look to 1930 as my vantage point.

I'm 33. Is that 'very very old?' If not, then I guess I'm just weird.

I didn't know you were called Dennis

imgod2u		2012-04-30 01:09:07 PM

Surool: ... and Black Swan was a remake of Perfect Blue. Talk about derivative.

But they integrated far more angles into the story.

wildsnowllama		2012-04-30 01:10:39 PM

frepnog: Lumbar Puncture: Zombie Eater: Do we need another one? We had the original, a shiatty sequel, a made-for-TV remake in 2002, and now this? I'm sure King's got other stuff that's up for remakes. Salem's Lot? Pet Semetary? How about...Stand By Me? *runs*

I'd go for a remake of Firestarter.

Stand By Me is fine the way it is.

actually... that is one that really doesn't need a remake. the original holds up pretty well and is almost word for word the novel. the only reason to remake it now would be to make it more gruesome.

Till they break out the papier-mâché fireballs at the end.