Did they name it Sum Ting Wong?

But he was just born that way. Why can't they accept that?

"We wanted children. But not those kind of children. Those kind of children make the neighbors talk."

They still love her and feed her mice.

So just because you're gay doesn't mean you can't be a racist idiot too.
Makes sense, atheists can be irrational, serial killers can be kind to small animals and politicians can be sincere.

I hear that all that sperm looks the same anyway.

ciberido: DerAppie: portscanner: [thatsracist.jpg]

/amifirst?

It's about starting a family with offspring that is similar to you. Racial mix-ups undermine that.

If you demand that the people in your life be "similar to you" racially, then you're a farking racist and can go fark yourself with a sparkly raindow--colored fishing pole. And trying to defend it is makes it that much more scummy.

I never said anything about 'the people in my life need to be similar to me'. If you date someone from a different race and you have a bi-racial baby, well, you went in expecting that and you'll be similar to the kid due to genetics. But 2 white people getting a black/Latino/Asian kid due to IVF? That will put some stress on the child and the family. If you think that expecting a baby and the baby comes out a completely different race isn't distressing to most people, well, you just might be delusional.

There is a reason why step children (amongst others) are more likely to be abused. The lack physical similarity and the lack of family ties makes them more of a 'stranger' and competition for attention and resources to the unrelated party. Especially if both parties bring a child from a previous relationship into the new relationship. Now extrapolate this to a racial mix-up at the IVF clinic causing one of the partners to suddenly be very much disconnected from the child. Does this sound like a recipe for a happy and stable family? No. To relate to the first couple in TFA, they had one child who was similar to partner A and born from partner B. The second child is not similar to partner A, but still born from partner B (assuming the same person went though both pregnancies). The partner ho gave birth to the children is still connected to both of them. The partner who isn't will most likely develop a preference for the child who is similar, neglecting the other child.

/Follow some basic psychology courses, you might have known this if you did

qlenfg: A child possessed by Satan is a nightmare that will last forever.

Now, now. It may seem like it lasts forever, but they outgrow the Terrible Twos eventually.

You mean I'm going to stay this color?

r1niceboy: And children? This is why gays shouldn't be allowed to breed.

Shoot, I say let them breed all they want. What's gonna come of it, besides a shiathole that looks like a wizard sleeve?

Thanks for the headline. Now I have that Foo Fighters song stuck in my head.

/(it's The Pretender)

Big deal, they kept their receipts, right?

/what's the return policy on a newborn?

Mad Scientist: If they had obtained their sperm in the normal way, this never would have happened.

At an interstate rest stop glory hole?

If they had obtained their sperm in the normal way, this never would have happened.

Wanting your spermbank children to all to have the same donor isn't racist.

What is rather racist is the implicit assumption that the family is white and the new child black.

They could be Asian and the new child Eskimo, for all we know.

Well, isn't that just special coming from the couple that doesn't like dick. It's not like the kids won't figure out later that they are bastards anyway.

They should have adopted a pair of South African orphans to be sure.

And children? This is why gays shouldn't be allowed to breed.