If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Wired)   The US is quietly positioning a lot of stealth aircraft near Iran. October surprise anyone?   (wired.com) divider line 117
    More: Interesting, Iran, U.S., ground attacks, F-15, invasion of Iraq, Global Hawk, Aviation Week, military exercise  
•       •       •

15860 clicks; posted to Main » on 27 Apr 2012 at 11:17 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-04-27 09:06:54 PM
12 votes:
cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

The only reason Bush got away with Iraq was because of 9/11. No way anyone would have said 'do it' otherwise.

People are tired of offensive wars. Let Iran and Israel square off. Without our money or weapons or man power.
2012-04-27 11:29:07 PM
9 votes:
The US has been surrounding Iran for years. Yet we wonder why they want to develop a nuclear defense.
2012-04-27 10:19:09 PM
9 votes:
Obama starting a war will piss off the people who vote for him and the people who won't vote for him still won't vote for him.
2012-04-27 10:00:23 PM
8 votes:
also - I really don't want another war. it would be noisy. And I swear to f*cking god, if we have another war in the middle east I'm going to force the ENTIRE underclass of harvard and yale universities to enlist in the gotdamn infantry.
2012-04-27 08:59:56 PM
8 votes:
EnviroDude: get the popcorn ready young men, you are going to go to the Middle East (what better way to put unemployed graduates to work than to draft them for WWIV.

If I had my way we'd just send you... an Army of Dumb.
2012-04-27 11:00:25 PM
7 votes:
Why do I feel like if they were quietly doing something with stealth aircraft...we wouldn't know about it?
2012-04-27 09:36:28 PM
7 votes:
cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

I think it more likely that Israel will start the war, then quickly get in over their heads and scream bloody murder for the USA to come bail 'em out.
2012-04-27 11:32:25 PM
5 votes:
i.imgur.com
2012-04-28 12:20:51 AM
4 votes:
God willing, my husband and I can kick off our combat boots for good within a year. He is active duty AF and I am Air Guard. We've spent more than half of our 7 year marriage apart. We are done. 48 years combined service. Someone else's turn to sacrifice. Armchair warriors, care to volunteer? Your kids, perhaps? Thanks!
2012-04-28 12:09:40 AM
4 votes:
How about this. Lets NOT murder a bunch of brown people and kill a bunch of our own people as well. Lets just skip this war. If Israel wants a war let them do it alone. Not our business.
2012-04-27 10:07:15 PM
4 votes:
Weaver95: also - I really don't want another war. it would be noisy. And I swear to f*cking god, if we have another war in the middle east I'm going to force the ENTIRE underclass of harvard and yale universities to enlist in the gotdamn infantry.

The market for starting unnecessary wars sure has boomed since the draft ended, hasn't it?

/just a little more risk-shifting from the wealthy... it's a tricklin' all over the place
2012-04-27 09:56:40 PM
4 votes:
Or, you know, not so quietly.
2012-04-28 01:04:12 AM
3 votes:
Iran will not be allowed to get nuclear weapons pure and simple. If Obama has to invade Iran to achieve that he will. The folks who decide to not vote for him because of the war won't be voting for Romney anyway. Enough Republicans are in Israel's pocket that there won't be enough no votes to allow the Democrats to cut off funding for military operations. Romney won't really be able to protest and will have to throw his support behind Obama's war. Iran will make Iraq and Afghanistan look like cake walks.

To sum up Obama won't lose enough votes to cost him the election so the invasion is probably a go.
If Bush can win an election in the midst of an unpopular war so can Obama.

It will be fun to watch as the Nobel Peace Prize winner launches the nastiest war yet.
2012-04-28 12:35:36 AM
3 votes:
Seeing that since all of the stupid voters of 1980 voted for Reagan because they were being so butthurt about the Iran Hostage Crisis (with Reagan doing more harm to America than it ever did to Iran. Thanks loads, you shortsighted dumbsh*ts!), I'd like to hold Iran directly responsible for causing the past thirty years of "trickle down", "voodoo economics", and Iran/Contra that plague us to this very day.

i48.photobucket.com
Hangin's too good for em! Burnin's too good for em!
2012-04-27 11:32:39 PM
3 votes:
Gyrfalcon: Plus America holding back Saudi Arabia

Is that the case?

For about two decades, I've kept hearing that many Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, would love to see Iran (non-Arab) knocked down and so would overtly make a show of condemning Israel but actually do nothing, or even covertly provide support.

Not that I know shiat.
2012-04-27 11:26:22 PM
3 votes:
Yeah, no.

I remember the original October surprise. That involved paying Iran to hold on to US hostages to win an election. Those guys - Reagan, Bush I - were also the ones who created bin Laden.

The guy who got bin Laden isn't playing that traitorous bullshiat.

I'll chock this up to the GOP raising war fears against Iran, only to find out that their own funders (Koch bros) do a lot of business there so it would be inconvenient to have a war for them, really, so now they are raising the possibility that actually putting the screws to Iran would be MOST IMPRUDENT (nah gah doit).

/oh, DNTRFA
// yeah, doin it and doin it well
/// don't want another war
2012-04-27 11:24:02 PM
3 votes:
Worst secret attack ever.
2012-04-27 11:23:05 PM
3 votes:
cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

i45.tinypic.com

you obviously didn't see the lame shiat three hour graphic that people bought to invade iraq, did you.
2012-04-27 09:59:20 PM
3 votes:
It's not like the GOP has been begging for it for ye... wait, they've been begging for it for years.
2012-04-27 09:10:21 PM
3 votes:
Nadie_AZ: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

The only reason Bush got away with Iraq was because of 9/11. No way anyone would have said 'do it' otherwise.

People are tired of offensive wars. Let Iran and Israel square off. Without our money or weapons or man power.


9/11 wasnt the sole reason. The US had been pushing Saddam as the boogie man for years. Worked so well they even had pro-war marches.
2012-04-28 09:02:16 PM
2 votes:
LasersHurt: Brontes: clambam: Trapper439: I. Dont. Give. A. Shiat. About. Israel.


Sure. You. Do. You want to see it gone. Because You. Hate. Jews.

(Not supporting Israel) != (Anti-Semnite). you. f'ing moron

That happens a lot around here.


Anyone who would blame the Israeli people for the actions of their government should look our own government. Are we responsible for all the shiat our government pulls on a regular basis? God, I hope not.

The simple fact is that The People do not control governments anymore - money does.
2012-04-28 10:51:41 AM
2 votes:
i1089.photobucket.com
2012-04-28 08:11:53 AM
2 votes:
I honestly am starting to feel sorry for Iran. Not their government, mind you, but all the innocent people living there who've never really done anything to the USA whom have already been sentenced to death by bombing. For over a year now they've known that the USA is going to kill them because... heck, do they even need a reason? And there is nothing that they can do to stop it. They can't even preemptively surrender, because the USA is not going to change it's mind for any reason. The bombs will drop, the innocent people will die, and there isn't anything the general public in either country can do to prevent it. They're all living on death row, already tried and convicted by the USA of the unforgivable crime of simply existing.

But hey, at least we're better than those terrorists, right?
2012-04-28 06:12:18 AM
2 votes:
As long as Haliburton, KB&R, Blackwater and every other privatized military-esque company exists and has the pockets of every politician lined with the blood of our children, America will never be without war.
2012-04-28 03:49:48 AM
2 votes:
I'd love to see a candidate, preferably a Republican, did this speech:

"I love this country. I consider myself a proud American, and I feel proud of everything our principles stand for. We are still a beacon of freedom in the world, despite these trying times. I am a proud family man, and a deeply religious person. I work hard every day to insure every day that the America that warms my heart, shines as brightly as the sun shines at Dawn. However, my religious views are somewhat, different, from the average American. Many of us consider ourselves Christian, and say we follow the rules of God, some are Jewish, some are Hindu, the greatest thing of America, is the variety of our people here. Me, for example, my ancestors, as well as many of here today, come from European descent, and so, I follow their roots: I worship not Christ, but the ancient gods of the Norse. I live by their principles and laws, and I have come to believe that our love of war is more in tune with the Allfather Odin, than it is with Jesus. And so, I simply wish to ask my fellow Americans, if you want this war, if you are comfortable with taking the life of another man, you are going against the teachings of your Christ. So please, stop living a lie, and embrace the calling of our ancestors. Let us praise the gods of our forefathers, and support the troops".
2012-04-28 03:46:20 AM
2 votes:
bonobo73: freetomato: bonobo73: freetomato: God willing, my husband and I can kick off our combat boots for good within a year. He is active duty AF and I am Air Guard. We've spent more than half of our 7 year marriage apart. We are done. 48 years combined service. Someone else's turn to sacrifice. Armchair warriors, care to volunteer? Your kids, perhaps? Thanks!

An awfully smug attitude from someone that literally never had their boots on the ground. Plan to have any of your kids or nephews and nieces make up for it by serving in the Army or Marines?

*Sigh* I'll bite.

Ask any soldier or marine how glad they are to see aircraft/airpower support from above when in a tight spot.

You have no clue what the USAF does, do you?

And yes, asshole, my son is an Army ROTC cadet - a commission upon graduation in 2 years. Our family has walked the walk, and continues to. And you and yours have done......?

Forget it - whatever. I won't get into a patriotic urinary Olympiad with you or your ilk. Nothing to prove.

As soon as you called the rest of us armchair warriors you got exactly what you deserved.

I also provide support from a distance. It's called taxes, which pay for the your equipment, fuel training and your salary and your benefits.

You and your husband served for 48 combined years. Voluntarily. Which meant you and hubby decided the gig was good enough to make a career out of it.

Your son is ROTC, which means he's never seen active duty either. And theres a good chance that he won't see any due to troop drawdowns.

Please explain to me how all this allows you to request that anyone else or their kids go eat IEDs.


As an Air National Guardsman, I assisted in domestic emergencies during floods and tornadoes. I was glad to do that - we made sure that fresh water and first aid was available to those that needed it. It was a part time job for me for many years, on top of my fulltime civilian job. Our unit ihas a primary mission - the only USAF unit that accomplishes that unique mission. We are obliged to do that too. I don't ask that your pudgy, soft kids eat IEDs. I just ask that if you are pounding war drums, that you be aware that these are not pawns on a chessboard, these are humans with lives and families.

And yes, God willing, we will be the hell out of Afghanistan by the time my son gets his commission.

Do you really not get why a military family might have a problem with chickenhawks? Surely you cannot be that stupid. But then again, many "patriots" the past decade or so have been amazingly clueless.
2012-04-28 02:46:00 AM
2 votes:
BuckTurgidson: A Dark Evil Omen: Fine. Fark you all. Do it. Bring this house of cards down for good. This is what you want, this is what you get. Break that motherfarking camel's back; Occupations around the country should be ready to start rebuilding what you're raring to destroy right around then. Maybe we'll all get it right this time.

I believe I can speak for everyone in asking WTF your actual aims might be, and what you yourself personally intend to create and offer in order to advance those aims.

We'll wait. Seriously, take your time, think it through, do it right.


Well, I know in Seattle we are assembling farming co-ops, housing co-ops, independent street medic teams, communications systems independent of corporate backbones and fixed infrastructure, mass logistics... I don't know of anyone working on power systems, so that's a gap... If you're really interested in what's happening in your local area you should find where your local GA is meeting.
2012-04-28 02:34:27 AM
2 votes:
bonobo73: freetomato: God willing, my husband and I can kick off our combat boots for good within a year. He is active duty AF and I am Air Guard. We've spent more than half of our 7 year marriage apart. We are done. 48 years combined service. Someone else's turn to sacrifice. Armchair warriors, care to volunteer? Your kids, perhaps? Thanks!

An awfully smug attitude from someone that literally never had their boots on the ground. Plan to have any of your kids or nephews and nieces make up for it by serving in the Army or Marines?


*Sigh* I'll bite.

Ask any soldier or marine how glad they are to see aircraft/airpower support from above when in a tight spot.

You have no clue what the USAF does, do you?

And yes, asshole, my son is an Army ROTC cadet - a commission upon graduation in 2 years. Our family has walked the walk, and continues to. And you and yours have done......?

Forget it - whatever. I won't get into a patriotic urinary Olympiad with you or your ilk. Nothing to prove.
2012-04-28 01:48:26 AM
2 votes:
TheEdibleSnuggie: Delivered in 30 minutes or it's free. I don't even care anymore, and seriously, what's the point of having these things IF YOU NEVER ARE GOING TO USE THEM.

We use them all the time, for their only use: to prevent nuclear weapons from being used. They work very well.
2012-04-28 01:27:20 AM
2 votes:
I can only speak for a 1500 member strong unit of the USAF/ANG but we are burnt out. We are tired. The ops tempo over the last 10 years, combined with ancillary training and regular inspections....nobody has had time to stop and take a breath. And we are the AF -shorter deployments,not always on the front lines, but taxing nonetheless, and away from families just the same. Shorter tours, but more of them - I can't imagine how stressed the Army and Marine units are (not to mention the Navy). It is farkin' insane to get us into another engagement right now. We can't afford it and our troops are stretched thin as it is, not to mention the many thousands of damaged young men and women that the VA has to take care of. Armchair warriors/strategists - you just piss me right off. You have no clue what kind of affect the "shock and awe" you long for has on the pawns. You all better just STFU when an influx of Iraq/Afghanistan vets are flooding the $y$tem . You wanted war - to kick A-Rab ass? You didn't sacrifice a damn thing when it was happening - you better put up and shut up when they need our help.

And BTW. My husband was on the very first crew to fly over Libya in a surveillance plane, doing what they do. Clean, swift, no US casualties. As it should be. Well done, leadership.
2012-04-28 12:43:11 AM
2 votes:
The U.S. Air Force is quietly assembling the world's most powerful air-to-air fighting team at bases near Iran

Not so quietly now eh, traitor?!

encrypted-tbn0.google.com
2012-04-28 12:08:25 AM
2 votes:
Somacandra: There was another recent Fark article of dubious import stating that Russia is massing its own forces near its relevant borders in preparation for anything that goes down. Perhaps there is some connection (if this turns out to be true at all)


Russia doesn't have a border with Iran. However..... their border that's closest to Iran is their border with Georgia. You know, the place Russia decided to smack around in 2008? THAT'S most likely why they're massing troops there. Anything they're saying otherwise is probably a ruse.
2012-04-27 11:38:51 PM
2 votes:
kill'em all and let their gods sort them out.
2012-04-27 11:36:23 PM
2 votes:
And what? You people don't think AIPAC should get what they've paid for?
2012-04-27 11:31:00 PM
2 votes:
Arkanaut: NFA: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

A friend of mine just came back from Abu Dhabi and he said unless something big happens to change the plan, we're going to do it.

Does your friend work for the DoD or CIA or something? Otherwise I don't see what being in Abu Dhabi tells him about what's being planned/decided in Washington.



Exactly. If his friend knows, he wouldn't be telling otherwise he'd be violating OpSec. Therefore, I will have to assume that since his friend is telling, he doesn't know squat about anything.
2012-04-27 11:23:14 PM
2 votes:
cameroncrazy1984: vygramul: Weaver95: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

I think it more likely that Israel will start the war, then quickly get in over their heads and scream bloody murder for the USA to come bail 'em out.

They haven't needed to do it in the past. And just what would Iran do to retaliate? Have Hezbollah fire a few more Katyushas?

Iran had a larger army and a larger population than israel, don't they?


Israel would need help keeping the Sunnis back if Iran goes to war on them also. Plus America holding back Saudi Arabia and Syria I'd suspect.
2012-04-27 11:20:13 PM
2 votes:
Weaver95: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

I think it more likely that Israel will start the war, then quickly get in over their heads and scream bloody murder for the USA to come bail 'em out.


Sounds about right.
2012-04-27 10:23:46 PM
2 votes:
EnviroDude: ha ha ha! sorry there NPG, but I aged out years ago.


I'll grant you an age waiver. Go forth and become cannon fodder.
2012-04-27 10:06:08 PM
2 votes:
These are long planned deployments. The Raptor fleet is going to join the regular rotation of forward deployed air groups.

Air strikes seem highly unlikely to do anything. I want to say that despite a large number of "bunker busters" used, Saddam's bunkers survived the pounding.
2012-04-27 09:40:27 PM
2 votes:
If they're stealth aircraft, how do we know they're really there?
2012-04-27 09:35:59 PM
2 votes:
www.ippnw-students.org
2012-04-27 09:04:23 PM
2 votes:
Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?
2012-04-29 04:25:52 PM
1 votes:
Forgot_my_password_again: if there is one thing we can all learn from fark, its that the person holding a particular view is right 100% and anyone who doesn't have the same view is an idiot.

if you don't agree, you're an idiot.


What, you want a crying baby pic now or something? Attacking Iran is a stupid idea. That is known as an "indefensible position."
2012-04-28 07:40:23 PM
1 votes:
clambam: Trapper439: I. Dont. Give. A. Shiat. About. Israel.


Sure. You. Do. You want to see it gone. Because You. Hate. Jews.


(Not supporting Israel) != (Anti-Semnite). you. f'ing moron
2012-04-28 04:35:40 PM
1 votes:
Tatsuma: How is that a surprise, considering that the majority of Americans approve of attacking Iran in order to prevent them from developing weapons?

The majority of Americans are idiots, however.
2012-04-28 12:42:49 PM
1 votes:
Not all Israelis are gung-ho to go to war:

Israeli ex-intel chief slams PM's Iran stance

Hopefully, cooler heads will prevail.
2012-04-28 12:26:01 PM
1 votes:
Mrtraveler01: AverageAmericanGuy: There's a lot of anti-semitic undercurrent in a bunch of posts here. There is a worrisome increase in anti-semitism in Europe. In America, the liberals have all but disowned Israel.

The risk of a second Holocaust is increasing at a frightening pace.

My local supermarket didn't have the Kosher Coke for Passover (primarily because there's no Jews where I live), so obviously my supermarket is Anti-Semitic.

/Not even Jewish
//Just like getting the Coke


Israel has shown compassion by the world and yet seem to want to show little compassion for others peoples in similar plights. Just because they had a Holocaust doesn't give them license act like dicks and expect America to come and save them. Israel has the means to defend itself. They are using us.

Also don't confuse anti-Zionism with anti-semitism . Not supporting the policies of Israel does not equate to hating the Jewish people.
2012-04-28 12:25:26 PM
1 votes:
freetomato: Do you really not get why a military family might have a problem with chickenhawks? Surely you cannot be that stupid. But then again, many "patriots" the past decade or so have been amazingly clueless.

You may as well stop. They don't care. You are simply there to do their bidding. Don't worry, they will fly the flag, put a yellow sticker on the car and shake your hand and the thank you for your service. But this will also rail agaist having to pay for war through increased taxes or any type of financial burden. They will want to send troops in before any consideration as to the impact on the troops. They will fight against raising your pay. They will make sure to do everything to question you when things go wrong. You are only there to complete their dream of a America as nation that can kick ass and let God sort them out. That is all that they really care about.

By the a bonobo is one of the apes that has a bare ass. I picture him like in this thread like this:

i202.photobucket.com
2012-04-28 12:19:11 PM
1 votes:
AverageAmericanGuy: There's a lot of anti-semitic undercurrent in a bunch of posts here. There is a worrisome increase in anti-semitism in Europe. In America, the liberals have all but disowned Israel.

The risk of a second Holocaust is increasing at a frightening pace.


Not sucking Israel's cock all the time does not equal being anti-Semitic.
2012-04-28 11:57:26 AM
1 votes:
Who cares if Iran has nukes?

It would be suicide to use them. The world would unite against them and they know it. The only thing nukes would do for Iran is deter a direct US/Israeli invasion.

And don't me with propaganda "wipe Israel from the map". First, it was mistranslated. Second, look at how many stupid things does our own governments spew. Does everything our president say or do reflect your personal views?

The tail is wagging the dog; we are being led by the nose into another war by people who won't fight it, but will surely profit form it.
2012-04-28 10:38:16 AM
1 votes:
AverageAmericanGuy: There's a lot of anti-semitic undercurrent in a bunch of posts here. There is a worrisome increase in anti-semitism in Europe. In America, the liberals have all but disowned Israel.

The risk of a second Holocaust is increasing at a frightening pace.


Yeah, but this time, it'll be the Jews *doing* the ethnic cleansing.

/too easy?
2012-04-28 10:22:37 AM
1 votes:
jaytkay: The quick cheap strategy would be for the US to take out the fundamentalists with a few airstrikes.

Meaning the Israelis in the illegal settlements in the occupied territories.

Bam! Lots of problems solved.


No, it would just justify the pro-settlement folks using the "anti-semite" card anytime anyone says one goddamn thing that is remotely cricitical of Israel (meaning anything short of 100% support of anything Israel does )

That cards gets used more than the race card ever could.
2012-04-28 10:02:11 AM
1 votes:
winterwhile: wars end

No, America finds excuses to have a war every single decade since the end of WWII. Coincidence?

Entitlements are funded by current contributions by current workers. Not even remotely the same.
2012-04-28 09:58:00 AM
1 votes:
freetomato: /amused by the strategists on fark who have never worn a uniform yet speak with authority

I'm amused that people who sit in air conditioned offices thousands of miles away from the battlefield try and play the holier than thou card when they could have quit a long time ago and done something actually patriotic, like starting a charity in America, running for political office, peace corps, etc.

I guess that settles it, you ARE a self entitled immature kid at heart. No, we will not worship you for wearing the uniform, nothing you did was unique and special, you are just another number in the military industrial complex. You are an enemy of peace. Nobody should worship stormtroopers.
2012-04-28 09:54:36 AM
1 votes:
freetomato: Zing!

In our unit, the primary mission is to watch out for the kids on the ground - to make sure the road ahead is clear and safe. My husband calls "all clear" from above; I make sure that their shiat is all in one sock before they leave. If you think those are unimportant, then you have never served, and you are welcome to scoff all you want. And by all means, root for kicking A-Rab Ass from your armchair. That helps.


Not sure if really self entitled or just really really brainwashed.
No I will not "root" for a decade long occupation of a country that had nothing to do with 9/11. Want to go after "A-Rab Ass" to avenge the 9/11 attacks? Invade Egypt Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, or STFU.
2012-04-28 09:52:26 AM
1 votes:
bluenovaman: If there is any truth to this, Obama is looking to alienate his base. I'm no pacifist, but he won't get my vote doing that kind of crap.

/getting outta here when ww3 breaks out. Fark tha noise!


Seriously. Is there a kickstarter I could support for a spot on an orbital colony or something? Because it's becoming very clear that this planet is farked.
2012-04-28 09:48:24 AM
1 votes:
If there is any truth to this, Obama is looking to alienate his base. I'm no pacifist, but he won't get my vote doing that kind of crap.

/getting outta here when ww3 breaks out. Fark tha noise!
2012-04-28 09:15:29 AM
1 votes:
RanDomino: cman
Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

Who better?


cameroncrazy1984
Why do I feel like if they were quietly doing something with stealth aircraft...we wouldn't know about it?

The number of stories like this might suggest that the point is to intimidate Iran. Their only real countermeasure is the threat of shutting down the Strait and blowing up the US economy. If they can be convinced that they won't be able to do that, then their best option would be to allow inspectors rather than face an Israeli attack backed up by the US armada.

Iran had a larger army and a larger population than israel, don't they?

Are you serious?


Mrtraveler01
Good thing we don't get much oil from Iran then.

Seriously?


Yeah, farking seriously. try reading up on some shiat, idiot.
2012-04-28 08:53:43 AM
1 votes:
PonceAlyosha: HMS_Blinkin: Unlike you, I am a big fan of Obama, but if he starts another war, I'll vote for Mitt Romney in a heartbeat. When will these clowns understand? WE ARE FARKING SICK OF POINTLESS OFFENSIVE WARS

The worst part is the moment Romney heard about Obama declaring war he'd start campaigning on declaring a bigger, more profitable war.


Not if Obama based the war on a past and very successful and well-liked war that Romney implemented as Governor of Massachusetts. Then Romney would repudiate the whole idea and say it was the biggest mistake of his life, and that a war that works for Mass. doesn't work for the whole country.
2012-04-28 08:53:18 AM
1 votes:
HMS_Blinkin: Weaver95: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

I think it more likely that Israel will start the war, then quickly get in over their heads and scream bloody murder for the USA to come bail 'em out.

So? Israel can yell and scream all they want, we have no obligation to help them. And we'd better not, not if they're the aggressors!


No we have to help Israel regardless if they're the aggressors or not because if we don't help them no matter what, it means we're Anti-Semites...or something.
2012-04-28 08:48:48 AM
1 votes:
HMS_Blinkin: Unlike you, I am a big fan of Obama, but if he starts another war, I'll vote for Mitt Romney in a heartbeat. When will these clowns understand? WE ARE FARKING SICK OF POINTLESS OFFENSIVE WARS

The worst part is the moment Romney heard about Obama declaring war he'd start campaigning on declaring a bigger, more profitable war.
2012-04-28 08:18:08 AM
1 votes:
winterwhile: wars end

entitlements never end


Alright tell me.

When will the "War on Terror" end?
2012-04-28 07:52:03 AM
1 votes:
U.S. enters WWI: President Wilson, Democrat
U.S. enters WWII: President Roosevelt, Democrat and we are still there (Japan, Germany, etc)
U.S. enters Korea: President Truman, Democrat and we are still there
U.S. enters Vietnam as 'advisers': President Kennedy, Democrat
U.S. escalates involvement in Vietnam to full scale war: President Johnson, Democrat

Yes, I am leaving out the Republican ones, as well as many minor ones from all sides, like 'Monica's Missiles' from Clinton's era, not to mention the Bush family feud in Iraq. This list is just to show that Democrats are not immune to the call to war that politics or events can drive them to. If you think Obama will not go into Iran, you are assuming much. I hope he does not, but I have no way to know what is going to happen and no one else does either, but a very few at the top.

Politics will decide this. If Obama feels politically vulnerable, the temptations to appeal to patriotic jingoism will be great.
2012-04-28 07:46:50 AM
1 votes:
doesn't surprise me at all. I live next to a major rail line that runs north/south through our state (GA) and for the past few weeks I have seen a lot of new military vehicles headed south. there was one train the other day with over 1000 brand new humvees with the turret mounts on it. a few days before were a bunch of bulldozers, a few days before that were fuel trucks. all of them desert sand color.

I haven't seen that much military hardware shipping that fast since the build up before the Iraq invasion.
2012-04-28 07:13:12 AM
1 votes:
wademh: Heron: EnviroDude: should be an interesting war. We just gave them our drone technology and now we are going to bomb them from 30,000 feet until they nuke Israel.

get the popcorn ready young men, you are going to go to the Middle East (what better way to put unemployed graduates to work than to draft them for WWIV.

I get the sense that Americans are going to be REALLY upset if we go to war with Iran. Not so much in a "But the Iranian people aren't our enemies" sort of way (despite their consistently measured responses to our belligerence, plenty in the US seem to buy the absurd line that the Ayatollah is the global terrorist puppet-master), but rather in a "Oh My farking God; not this bullshiat again" kind of way. If Obama thinks bombing Iran is going to increase his domestic support, he's got another thing coming. Union citizens don't want another war, period.

The GOP has already been huffing and puffing about doing something about Iran. If Obama does, would erstwhile Obama voters switch and vote for Romney? No. Would Obama then win FL? Yes. I don't want to be that cynical, but I'm not sure that dropping a few bombs on nuclear weapons manufacturing sites is the worst thing we could do. I don't know enough about what Iran is likely to do with the bombs I'm sure it's building.


They won't vote for Romney, but they won't vote for Obama, either. The only reason why Obama isn't going into this election with a prospective landslide is because how how significantly he has alienated the coalition of voters who elected him 4 years ago.

And why are you so sure Iran is building nukes? Every agency whose responsibility it is to figure out these sorts of things, from the IAEA to the DIA to the CIA, disagrees with you on that assessment. The last time there was any credible evidence that Iran was pursuing a bomb program was 2003.
2012-04-28 07:07:17 AM
1 votes:
Dadoody: Isn't it adorable how Americans love to make and watch movies about being invaded and fighting back? If not from Aliens, then from the Russians, South Americans, Chinese, or North Koreans (HA!).....

And yet the only ones doing the invading are the Americans themselves? Isn't that just adorable how we do things to other people we don't want done to ourselves?

I think it's cute. Especially since all of our gained tactics and weapons tech will most likely be used by our government against us one day. Soon. If not already in many circumstances.


"Surveillance" drones are on their way to a police department near you, after all, and the weapon dealers aren't even making it a secret that they hope to develop and sell weaponized versions to law-enforcement in the next few years. Just imagine it; in 5 years or so, the police will be able to shoot gun you down for perceived slights from the comfort of their own homes!
2012-04-28 06:58:47 AM
1 votes:
RoyBatty: Gyrfalcon: Plus America holding back Saudi Arabia

Is that the case?

For about two decades, I've kept hearing that many Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, would love to see Iran (non-Arab) knocked down and so would overtly make a show of condemning Israel but actually do nothing, or even covertly provide support.

Not that I know shiat.


The Saudi regime might be for it, but the actual people of Saudi Arabia, and the region generally, don't see Iran as a threat and really dislike US military involvement in their part of the world. In fact, polls have consistently shown the people of the Near East think of us as the biggest threat to peace in the region for decades.
2012-04-28 06:41:41 AM
1 votes:
freetomato: God willing, my husband and I can kick off our combat boots for good within a year. He is active duty AF and I am Air Guard. We've spent more than half of our 7 year marriage apart. We are done. 48 years combined service. Someone else's turn to sacrifice. Armchair warriors, care to volunteer? Your kids, perhaps? Thanks!

Sacrifice for what? The political glory of some assholes in Washington and the bloodlust of warmongers in Jerusalem? No thanks, my momma didn't raise no dummy.

/did you buy the "protecting our freedoms" line or did you do it for college money?
2012-04-28 06:41:12 AM
1 votes:
cman: Nadie_AZ: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

The only reason Bush got away with Iraq was because of 9/11. No way anyone would have said 'do it' otherwise.

People are tired of offensive wars. Let Iran and Israel square off. Without our money or weapons or man power.

9/11 wasnt the sole reason. The US had been pushing Saddam as the boogie man for years. Worked so well they even had pro-war marches.


Not nearly as big as the anti-war ones, but you'd never know that from how completely the media ignored the anti-war movement.
2012-04-28 06:30:37 AM
1 votes:
EnviroDude: should be an interesting war. We just gave them our drone technology and now we are going to bomb them from 30,000 feet until they nuke Israel.

get the popcorn ready young men, you are going to go to the Middle East (what better way to put unemployed graduates to work than to draft them for WWIV.


I get the sense that Americans are going to be REALLY upset if we go to war with Iran. Not so much in a "But the Iranian people aren't our enemies" sort of way (despite their consistently measured responses to our belligerence, plenty in the US seem to buy the absurd line that the Ayatollah is the global terrorist puppet-master), but rather in a "Oh My farking God; not this bullshiat again" kind of way. If Obama thinks bombing Iran is going to increase his domestic support, he's got another thing coming. Union citizens don't want another war, period.
2012-04-28 03:26:13 AM
1 votes:
I'm cranky. I'm tired, and so is my husband. We've been up to our eyebrows in GWOT for years. We are ready to hang our USAF issued boots up.

And I'm full of bourbon.

Bring in youngun's, with less pay, let us senior NCOs with military knowledge retire...please

We are tired. I am. A dozen of my compatriots/friends are.

I can hook anyone interested up with a recruiter, if you are chomping at the bit to FLY! FIGHT! WIN!

/amused by the strategists on fark who have never worn a uniform yet speak with authority
2012-04-28 03:22:09 AM
1 votes:
BuckTurgidson: A Dark Evil Omen: BuckTurgidson: A Dark Evil Omen: Fine. Fark you all. Do it. Bring this house of cards down for good. This is what you want, this is what you get. Break that motherfarking camel's back; Occupations around the country should be ready to start rebuilding what you're raring to destroy right around then. Maybe we'll all get it right this time.

I believe I can speak for everyone in asking WTF your actual aims might be, and what you yourself personally intend to create and offer in order to advance those aims.

We'll wait. Seriously, take your time, think it through, do it right.

Well, I know in Seattle we are assembling farming co-ops, housing co-ops, independent street medic teams, communications systems independent of corporate backbones and fixed infrastructure, mass logistics... I don't know of anyone working on power systems, so that's a gap... If you're really interested in what's happening in your local area you should find where your local GA is meeting.

My local GA quietly dissolved (when the Denver PD militarized their entire pudgy incompetent crew to belligerently evict the actual protesters from the tiny patch of the Denver Civic Center Park which they had lawfully occupied, leaving behind only the long-term homeless already incorporated into the DPD's policies of impatient neglect) and now presumably engages in getting laid and rating the local MMJ.

No interest shown in buckling into the hard, tedious, frustrating, boring, necessary work of involving themselves at every level from neighborhood through school board up through state legistature like the right-wing fanatics are happy to do year in and year out.


Well, I don't have any contacts in Denver (mostly just on the west coast) but from what I'm seeing they've made some sizeable turnouts for some labor protests this month and like everyone else in Occupy are gearing up for May Day. As for political work, well, at least from my perspective we're a social movement, not a political one. We have people working on political issues but running for office is not really in tune with what many of us are trying to do, and is a somewhat futile gesture given that state of politics in the US anyway. Want to change that? Run for office in solidarity with Occupy. As long as you don't claim to lead or speak for the movement it would be welcomed. Bear in mind that I speak only for myself.
2012-04-28 02:48:11 AM
1 votes:
intelligent comment below: That sounds horrible, I hope I don't get drafted and forced to do it for 10 years like you did.

Zing!

In our unit, the primary mission is to watch out for the kids on the ground - to make sure the road ahead is clear and safe. My husband calls "all clear" from above; I make sure that their shiat is all in one sock before they leave. If you think those are unimportant, then you have never served, and you are welcome to scoff all you want. And by all means, root for kicking A-Rab Ass from your armchair. That helps.
2012-04-28 02:36:01 AM
1 votes:
FTFA: "The F-15Cs and F-22s sat out last year's Libya war."

Cracks me up whenever the media use this little tidbit in some attempt to portray these fighters as overpriced failures. What is always left out is this:

Left out of last year's Libya war: F-15's, F-22's and F-16's, A-10's, Apaches, Cobra's, F-18's, B-1's, B-2's, B-52's. It was a European campaign, nothing in the U.S. arsenal was necessary to use.
2012-04-28 02:32:41 AM
1 votes:
bonobo73: Social security.

You realize Medicare and Social Security have taxes collected to pay for them, right?
2012-04-28 02:30:40 AM
1 votes:
freetomato: I can only speak for a 1500 member strong unit of the USAF/ANG but we are burnt out. We are tired. The ops tempo over the last 10 years, combined with ancillary training and regular inspections....nobody has had time to stop and take a breath. And we are the AF -shorter deployments,not always on the front lines, but taxing nonetheless, and away from families just the same. Shorter tours, but more of them - I can't imagine how stressed the Army and Marine units are (not to mention the Navy). It is farkin' insane to get us into another engagement right now. We can't afford it and our troops are stretched thin as it is, not to mention the many thousands of damaged young men and women that the VA has to take care of. Armchair warriors/strategists - you just piss me right off. You have no clue what kind of affect the "shock and awe" you long for has on the pawns. You all better just STFU when an influx of Iraq/Afghanistan vets are flooding the $y$tem . You wanted war - to kick A-Rab ass? You didn't sacrifice a damn thing when it was happening - you better put up and shut up when they need our help.

And BTW. My husband was on the very first crew to fly over Libya in a surveillance plane, doing what they do. Clean, swift, no US casualties. As it should be. Well done, leadership.



That sounds horrible, I hope I don't get drafted and forced to do it for 10 years like you did.
2012-04-28 02:01:51 AM
1 votes:
Oh and just for all you fan bois,
Link
2012-04-28 01:49:34 AM
1 votes:
HeartBurnKid: I don't see a war breaking out with Iran unless Iran does something incredibly stupid. Obama's not dumb enough to provoke yet another war when we're still smarting from the last two.

I hope...


I'd hope so, too.

If we start a war in Iran, Obama would lose my vote (and the votes of a lot of others, I'd imagine). I don't even care that it might mean getting a Republican into office...This country would be farked either way.
2012-04-28 01:48:10 AM
1 votes:
Corporate Self: Amazing to realize we have been at war for over a decade now with no end in sight.

shiat, kids signing up these days are young enough that as far as they're concerned we have always been at war with eastwestasia.
2012-04-28 01:27:25 AM
1 votes:
Nadie_AZ

Smartest
Funniest
2012-04-27 09:06:54 PM
cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

The only reason Bush got away with Iraq was because of 9/11. No way anyone would have said 'do it' otherwise.

People are tired of offensive wars. Let Iran and Israel square off. Without our money or weapons or man power.

Um, you are MISSING the whole point. ANOTHER 9/11 WILL HAPPEN. The Zionists will AGAIN use US MILITARY for their
endless wars. Mossad. Their motto: "By deception we shall wage war". Hmmm, how many of Israel's troops EVER WENT TO AFGHANISTAN OR IRAQ???? ZERO. How many of OURS AND ALLIES DIED? LOT'S. Israel will USE US AGAIN. KILLING OUR TROOPS to fight for them.

See, they have figured it out. Have US DIE FOR THEIR WARS.

/NOT anti-semite
//have many jewish friends
///they ALL are disgusted with the WAR GENERALS from the 67 war who are currently "posing" as politicians
////we give Israel 3 BILLION a year in aid. UM, last i checked, they are a modern society with low unemployment
////DON'T get me started on the GENOCIDE they are committing against the Palestinians
2012-04-28 01:21:16 AM
1 votes:
Can't we let Israel take the lead on this? Why do keep putting our fellow Americans in harms way for other countries?
2012-04-28 01:16:21 AM
1 votes:
Nadie_AZ: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

The only reason Bush got away with Iraq was because of 9/11. No way anyone would have said 'do it' otherwise.

People are tired of offensive wars. Let Iran and Israel square off. Without our money or weapons or man power.


I agree, but there's no way the Jews will have that. Our government panders to them more than the Catholics. Billions of our tax dollars go to help people fight over sand, because HOLOCAUST. Israel's a tough country. They've got F-16s and nukes. They can hold their own. They've done it before and they can do it again. We shouldn't sacrifice our men and women for their war, when we can sell them weapons and achieve the same result.
2012-04-28 01:14:47 AM
1 votes:
I'm confused ...

Which manufactured enemy am I supposed to hate again?

Is it still the Kaiser?
2012-04-28 01:09:25 AM
1 votes:
Wow since the time that Rmoney got the nomination the right wing butt-hurt about Obama has gone up to 11!

Why is that guys? Not very happy about the guy you got?
2012-04-28 01:07:34 AM
1 votes:
RanDomino:

The number of stories like this might suggest that the point is to intimidate Iran. Their only real countermeasure is the threat of shutting down the Strait and blowing up the US economy. If they can be convinced that they won't be able to do that, then their best option would be to allow inspectors rather than face an Israeli attack backed up by the US armada.



also, electoral politics at home, if obama is after hawkish 'moderates'. god knows he wont lose anyone from the left my waving the sword around.

I doubt an actual attack is coming though. the .mil structure is pretty against it and i don't think obamas the type to tell them to pound sand. err hopefully.
2012-04-28 01:06:55 AM
1 votes:
cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

Wow it was only a like what less than a year ago people like you were attacking Obama as a war monger for what he did in Libya. Asking for impeachment hearings.
2012-04-28 01:04:19 AM
1 votes:
themindiswatching: My prediction: we're going into Iran no matter what. It's just a matter of when at this point.

/I won't complain if I'm proven wrong.


"When" being very important. After an internal revolt, or if they come within a decade of having nuke weapons capability?
2012-04-28 01:02:42 AM
1 votes:
My prediction: we're going into Iran no matter what. It's just a matter of when at this point.

/I won't complain if I'm proven wrong.
2012-04-28 12:37:40 AM
1 votes:
Work with an Iranian, super nice chick who has the same concerns in her day to day life as we do. Their leader is no more of a war monger than Bush or Netenyahu. Less so then Bush.
2012-04-28 12:29:59 AM
1 votes:
Be funny if that spy drone the Iranians captured was still on the clock.
2012-04-28 12:27:59 AM
1 votes:
TheEdibleSnuggie: Why amass a bunch of F-22's and F-15's when one of these will do just fine:

[www.titan-ii.com image 640x794]


Delivered in 30 minutes or it's free. I don't even care anymore, and seriously, what's the point of having these things IF YOU NEVER ARE GOING TO USE THEM.


We shoulda just nuked Loc Ninh.
2012-04-28 12:24:27 AM
1 votes:
deadcrickets: Knight of the Woeful Countenance: deadcrickets:

I agree it would be political suicide to go to war with Iran right now. However, if you watch the Pentagon Channel you'll see they are already telegraphing some troop movements into the area to places like Georgia.

Yeah, but the Pentagon Channel hasn't been any good since they started with programming stuff like Alien Hunters and Surplus Stars.

Not sure what version of a Pentagon Channel you are watching but ours only has stuff like DVIDS.


le sigh... and here I was thinking that joke was pretty clever...

carry on
2012-04-28 12:22:59 AM
1 votes:
TheEdibleSnuggie: Why amass a bunch of F-22's and F-15's when one of these will do just fine:

Jesus, do you realize the amount of forms that you have to fill out when you use one of those? It's just not worth it.
2012-04-28 12:21:44 AM
1 votes:
Xyphoid: I hope that if our government decides to go to war, it'll at least have the common decency to institute a draft.

It will be unavoidable. Despite what everyone is saying (read: the same pundits that claimed Iraqis would throw flowers at us), a groundwar with Iran would ultimately be necessary to accomplish anything. Unlike the assaults on Iraq during the Clinton Administration, it's unlikely we could just destroy the entire program with a few missiles. And considering the war on Iraq stretched the military to the breaking point, there is just no conceivable way we could occupy Iran without a draft.
2012-04-28 12:16:30 AM
1 votes:
Must not be too quiet if a Fark subby knows about it.
2012-04-28 12:14:38 AM
1 votes:
gameshowhost: It's not like the GOP has been begging for it for ye... wait, they've been begging for it for years.

Party of Fear.

/wonder how much they'd be begging for it if war profiteering was illegal
2012-04-28 12:13:35 AM
1 votes:
Oldiron_79: Nadie_AZ: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

The only reason Bush got away with Iraq was because of 9/11. No way anyone would have said 'do it' otherwise.

People are tired of offensive wars. Let Iran and Israel square off. Without our money or weapons or man power.

Well 9/11 wasn't the ONLY reason, don't forget that Clinton had tried(and failed) pushing congress to go to war with Iraq over violating the UN agreements back when he was trying to get the attention off of Monica,


Horse shiat.

Clinton successfully destroyed Iraq's chemical weapons program while the right wing morons (and by that, I mean you) screamed "wag the dog!" but at no time did he eve push to invade, hold or tip over the Iraqi regime. You'd have to be a special kind of stupid to suggest or support that...

Oh, wait...
2012-04-28 12:07:15 AM
1 votes:
lazyguineapig33: will i get yelled at if i said i hope Iran gets Nukes soon so that we don't end up in another war?

Probably. Also People will imply you long for the distruction of Isreal.
2012-04-27 11:54:00 PM
1 votes:
beta_plus: fragMasterFlash: Who the hell is going to pay for this little fête du freedom? The 1% damn sure are not and I've got no spare coin. I hate to think of how low the US credit rating will go if we borrow the $10 trillion this shiatfest will cost.

Modern Wars are cheap.

Social Security, Medicare, Unionized Public Schools, and Obamacare are very expensive.


www.memecreator.net

See how "cheap" modern war really is...
2012-04-27 11:53:26 PM
1 votes:
Weaver95: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

I think it more likely that Israel will start the war, then quickly get in over their heads and scream bloody murder for the USA to come bail 'em out.


Gotdam Weav, I know it's Friday night, but put down the bong and take a look at the farking map, will ya? It's nearly a thousand miles from Israel to Iran across two countries that hate both Israel and Iran with a passion. That eliminates any ground conflict between the two, and even if Israeli jets could reach Iran what are they going to do...drop a few bombs and go home?

Ain't gonna happen.
2012-04-27 11:49:21 PM
1 votes:
TheEdibleSnuggie: Why amass a bunch of F-22's and F-15's when one of these will do just fine:

[www.titan-ii.com image 640x794]


Delivered in 30 minutes or it's free. I don't even care anymore, and seriously, what's the point of having these things IF YOU NEVER ARE GOING TO USE THEM.


Thank you, and ya they are pretty , let them be free ; )

/ Otherwise start figuring other ways to solve problems other than war.
/I mean really let's dot the world with these
www.snydertalk.com
2012-04-27 11:48:38 PM
1 votes:
beta_plus: Obama won't attack until after the election.

If he attacks Iran oil goes through the roof and his approval rating will crash through the cellar floor.


Good thing we don't get much oil from Iran then.

Dumbass...
2012-04-27 11:44:44 PM
1 votes:
GAT_00: Or, you know, not so quietly.

It's a distraction for the real attack on Canada.

At long last, we will have closure, my brothers!
2012-04-27 11:43:22 PM
1 votes:

No way Halliburton et al can justify this without, at least, a little saber rattling now and again. But as to an actual war with Iran - I'm betting against it, this decade. No way the political fallout would be bearable by either party.

nationalpriorities.org
2012-04-27 11:37:04 PM
1 votes:
cman: I criticize Obama a lot, but even I am not that jaded to believe that he would do this. There is no way Obama will attack Iran. None.

Who's being naive, Kay?
2012-04-27 11:30:49 PM
1 votes:
Nadie_AZ: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

The only reason Bush got away with Iraq was because of 9/11. No way anyone would have said 'do it' otherwise.

People are tired of offensive wars. Let Iran and Israel square off. Without our money or weapons or man power.


Well 9/11 wasn't the ONLY reason, don't forget that Clinton had tried(and failed) pushing congress to go to war with Iraq over violating the UN agreements back when he was trying to get the attention off of Monica, none of the Democrats in congress who had voted for war when Clinton wanted to could have voted against it when Bush wanted to and not have been called for it. Limbaugh, Faux News et cetera would have eviserated them over it.

So most of the Dems in Congress COULDN'T vote against the war(and be able to justify doing so) because they had voted for it 4 years earlier. So politics as usual had a lot to do with it.
2012-04-27 11:30:30 PM
1 votes:
There was another recent Fark article of dubious import stating that Russia is massing its own forces near its relevant borders in preparation for anything that goes down. Perhaps there is some connection (if this turns out to be true at all)
2012-04-27 11:28:58 PM
1 votes:
I hope so I'm tired of hearing about and I want it now live 24/7 on the tv screen, who bombed who, death tolls civilian body counts all the way till the big ballon goes up and thirty minutes later delivered like a hot crappy pizza we all get to rest.

99 red balloons

/Tired of the warmongering and just wish they'd do it.
2012-04-27 11:23:52 PM
1 votes:
Obama won't attack until after the election.

If he attacks Iran oil goes through the roof and his approval rating will crash through the cellar floor.
2012-04-27 11:22:41 PM
1 votes:
I doubt any executive is capable of convincing the American people to support a pre-emptive war. However, I do think some sort of "Gulf of Tonkin" situation is possible, especially if some perceived small harm comes to either Israel or Saudi Arabia or both.
2012-04-27 11:21:32 PM
1 votes:
vygramul: Weaver95: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

I think it more likely that Israel will start the war, then quickly get in over their heads and scream bloody murder for the USA to come bail 'em out.

They haven't needed to do it in the past. And just what would Iran do to retaliate? Have Hezbollah fire a few more Katyushas?


Iran had a larger army and a larger population than israel, don't they?
2012-04-27 11:10:36 PM
1 votes:
Weaver95: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

I think it more likely that Israel will start the war, then quickly get in over their heads and scream bloody murder for the USA to come bail 'em out.


They haven't needed to do it in the past. And just what would Iran do to retaliate? Have Hezbollah fire a few more Katyushas?
2012-04-27 10:18:26 PM
1 votes:
Nadie_AZ: cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

The only reason Bush got away with Iraq was because of 9/11. No way anyone would have said 'do it' otherwise.

People are tired of offensive wars. Let Iran and Israel square off. Without our money or weapons or man power.


There is a bit of daddies unfinished business, Iraq wise too....
2012-04-27 09:36:01 PM
1 votes:
I_Am_Weasel: EnviroDude: should be an interesting war. We just gave them our drone technology .

The drones are being replaced an a flock of seagulls.


What the hell, Weasel!?

Damned pigeon English.
NFA [TotalFark]
2012-04-27 09:30:36 PM
1 votes:
cman: Does anyone in their right mind foolishly think that Obama of all people could convince the US to have a preemptive strike on Iran?

A friend of mine just came back from Abu Dhabi and he said unless something big happens to change the plan, we're going to do it.
2012-04-27 08:54:07 PM
1 votes:
should be an interesting war. We just gave them our drone technology and now we are going to bomb them from 30,000 feet until they nuke Israel.

get the popcorn ready young men, you are going to go to the Middle East (what better way to put unemployed graduates to work than to draft them for WWIV.
2012-04-27 08:33:13 PM
1 votes:
What, the cubbies will be playing? I don't believe it.
 
Displayed 117 of 117 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report