Zerochance: Jake Havechek: So are the Republicans. Nobody was madder than them when Obama okayed a hit on bin Laden.

Man, that night when the announcement was made, I foolishly thought to myself "surely the Republicans aren't going to find anything wrong with this. Surely".

Imagine my surprise to see the derp turned up to 11 the following morning.

Because, to save the house, you must burn down the house.

farkityfarker: Is anyone still proud to be an American?

YES

If so, why?

farkityfarker: Is anyone still proud to be an American?

If so, why?

I am. We have the sexiest butts.

kmmontandon: I think Republicans should run with this - claim that Obama is politicizing the war on terror and using scare tactics during an election campaign.

You know, because then they'll have to keep bringing up the whole "Osama's dead, Obama ordered it" part of things.

Besides they could then harp on how bad Obama is at Polticizing the GWOT as compared to president Bush. He was a true master of the art. You remmeber all those terror alerts in the summer of 2004? A cynic might have thought they were bogus and invented just to shore up Bush's poll numbers. But that wouldn't have been strictly accurate. Every one of those terror plots was uncovered by torturing an Al-Qeda operative name Abu Zubaydah, who bush publicly called a terror "mastermind" and personally gave the order to torture.

The problem was every single one of the plots he confessed to were pure fantasy, probably made up by him on the spot. That might have had something to do witht he fact that a) he was a very minor Al-Qaeda figure, basically the travel agent for memebers wives and girlfriends or more importantly that B) he was acutally clinically, full-on coo-coo for Cocoa Puffs, insane, As in he had Multiple personality disorder and occassionally thought he was a six year old girl. Something the FBI discovered by reading his journals and something they told the president BEFORE he gave to order fo the CIA to torture him,

But hey, since a terrorist said it, it was "valid info" and could be used to spend thousands of NYPD man hours to "investigate" and justify changing the "terror alert level " color chart right?

Great. The Truthers have mutated into Osama conspiracy nuts. I'll give you guys this much, at least you're bipartisan in your paranoid lunacy.

/this post is an anagram that only the clear-sighted can decode
//certain letters have been transposed for others to hide the truth from the non-cognisanti, you will know which
///who are you really running from?

Swagulus: To all the people who actually think Obama "killed" Osama last year: You are Joseph Goebbels wet dream...

Goebbels doesn't get an apostrophe?

If you don't like Joan Jett you should move to Pakistan. Go ahead and self-deport.

DrPainMD is kidding, right?

DrPainMD: HeartBurnKid: DrPainMD: LordJiro: DrPainMD: stoli n coke: No, it's because it's coming up on the first anniversary of Osama's death.

Subby, you didn't go to school on a regular-sized bus, did you?

You can tell if somebody took the short bus because they think Bin Laden was alive last year or that the military got him. Neither is true. The most likely story is that Bin Laden died in late 2001.

Your evidence? Speculation doesn't count, because it's, well, speculation.

Israeli intelligence.

How about the president of Pakistan?

What evidence do you have that we killed him last year? Remember, speculation doesn't count.

I don't know if you noticed, but... well, both of those links are pure speculation. Which, as we've already noted, doesn't count.

/PROTIP: When someone challenges you to produce evidence, try to avoid articles that heavily use the word "probably"

It doesn't matter. PROTIP: It's up to the person making the assertion (in this case, that we killed Bin Laden) to provide proof. No proof has been offered. The only rebuttal needed is, "you have no proof."

I was just thinking how much I miss 8th grade debate club.

intelligent comment below: HeartBurnKid: The one that recognized that the primary role of government is and should always be to protect its people's rights.

The rights only of slave owning white aristocrats you mean.

That comment was by no means intelligent