If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Hill)   "If Obama continues to lose Catholics by the margin the Pew poll suggests, that means he could lose the key swing states of Florida, Ohio, Colorado and Iowa"   (thehill.com) divider line 44
    More: Obvious, Obama administration, pew poll, Catholic Association, Iowa, Ohio, Catholics, Colorado, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops  
•       •       •

1260 clicks; posted to Politics » on 24 Apr 2012 at 11:48 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-04-24 10:49:37 AM
5 votes:
Instead of confronting protestors with a police presence, just send IRS lawyers to each protest with a stack of tax bills for each parish and diocese that is participating.

If you're going to use the pulpit to gin up votes, then you better look like paying some farking taxes.
2012-04-24 12:49:23 PM
3 votes:
Remember when Kennedy was running for President and all teh Republicans said that he'd just be taking orders from Rome and therefore, shouldn't be President?

Here they are a few decades later saying that Obama shouldn't be President because the government isn't taking orders from Rome
2012-04-24 10:53:10 AM
3 votes:
Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.


When do these political organizations lose their tax exempt status?
2012-04-24 12:44:48 PM
2 votes:
barneyfifesbullet: Obama has is going to lose Florida anyway.

He can thank Al Sharpton and the Black Panthers.


True, that probably hurt his FL numbers.

Obama doing well in Florida

Barack Obama starts the general election with a 5 point advantage over Mitt Romney in Florida, 50-45. This is the biggest lead Obama's had in Florida over the course of five polls PPP's done in the state since the beginning of 2011.

Or not.
2012-04-24 12:37:52 PM
2 votes:
EWreckedSean: tnpir: EWreckedSean: 1st amendment, and yes. As soon as you start taxing churches, you've violated the free exercise clause.

You CANNOT be serious. Dare I ask how you reached that conclusion? Or do you have the same GED in Law as our resident legal expert clown?

Try and understand this. I'll say it slowly. Once you put a tax requirement on a religion, you've made religion a pay to play organization, which is a violation of free exercise.


And YOU try to understand this, which I'll say even slower: HOW. Newspaper companies pay taxes, that doesn't infringe on freedom of press. So how is a church paying taxes an infringement of free exercise? And cite examples if you can actually come up with any.

Seriously, stop being a retard.
2012-04-24 11:04:14 AM
2 votes:
Elandriel: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.

When do these political organizations lose their tax exempt status?

After the election, if ever. There is zero chance that Obama would make a single move against religions using the church as a political tool. Not before the election for certain, because you can just see the media running with the "Obama comes out against churches" angle and obfuscate the details of the situation. If he wants to lose the election, that is what he should do. Otherwise, maybe wait until the election is over, and assuming he wins bring out all the evidence saying "Such and such church used its influence for political purposes, they will be taxed henceforth."


Yeah... rhetorical question
It pisses me off that churches can get away with being overtly political and still flaunt their tax-free status. If they want to be political, then pay the same ticket price the rest of us do.
2012-04-24 11:00:20 AM
2 votes:
Shostie: I'm Catholic. I will very likely vote for Obama unless it turns out that he's a Reptloid.

And even then, might end up as a coin flip.


It would make for a much more interesting election.

"TUESDAY, TUESDAY, TUESDAY! Come see RomneyBot 3000 battle Reptobama in a smack down royale for the soul of the country! He's got circuits and a capacity to dispatch his challengers with cold, emotionless precision. He's got an impenetrable armor of scales capable of deflecting the most ridiculous and withering assault, and a forked tongue that will charm you as it indoctrinates you with his liberal ideals."
2012-04-24 10:34:16 AM
2 votes:
Go ahead US Council of Catholic Bishops.

Go and protest women having access to health care. Do it.
2012-04-24 04:58:32 PM
1 votes:
What this article is basically saying is, "We haven't got a leg to stand on or a pot to piss on regarding the economy, so we're going to scare the rubes with Jesus again."

So ladies and gentlemen, here is the GOP's fall election strategy. Thanks t o The Hill for laying it all out for us libbying libs. Dumbasses.
2012-04-24 01:49:01 PM
1 votes:
RandomExcess: Liberals fail to realize that women in the US care about the economy and health care and are not as concerned with contraception and funded childcare.

For women, "health care" necessarily includes "health care below the waist", which is where the conflict with the conservatives begins.
2012-04-24 01:32:10 PM
1 votes:
Bhasayate: This thread has many enlightening comments, balanced discussion of the issues, and I have learned so much from the many posts. Cheers all around. Another great farking learning experience.

Reading trollery is always a learning experience. Proxy fights by trolling predators helps cull the rational argumentary herd of slower members so that the stronger can flourish even beyond Fark's borders. Trolls are doing a service to mankind by making us all smarter by allowing us to experience reductio ad absurdum vicariously.

If you can recognize logical fallacies, Thank a Troll!
2012-04-24 01:03:40 PM
1 votes:
EWreckedSean: chaoswolf: EWreckedSean: chaoswolf: EWreckedSean: Actually it will. Catholicism especially involves the following of sacraments, which require church infrastructure outside of praying alone in your room.

Then the priest can get off of his fat, lazy, kiddie-diddling ass and go to your house to help you with your symbolic cannibalism.

What priest? You've eliminated the church infrastructure, which includes the priests.

Bullshiat. Taxing a church on its profits will not in ANY way eliminate the church's infrastructure. If a church can't survive off of its tithes then it's a worthless business model and the free market will deal with it accordingly. Forcing it to pay taxes as any other business doesn't change that fact.

What profits exactly? Which part of non-profit organization is confusing to you?


What helping the poor might look like:

upload.wikimedia.org

No profit at all...
2012-04-24 01:01:20 PM
1 votes:
Lord_Baull: PRAYING IN YOUR ROOM IS STILL THE ABILITY TO WORSHIP THE GOD OF YOUR CHOICE, IDIOT!
In fact, Jesus said quite clearly that's how it should be done anyways.


No it isn't. I know a lot of people like to argue it is, but that wasn't the point of that admonition if you read the entirety of the passage, not just cherry picked that quote up, and I don't think for a second you actually have read that. You probably cribbed it from the countless times it has been parroted and tucked it away, but the whole point of that famous sermon had to do with how God knows true piety from false showings of piety done by people wanting to make a big show to others. He was not saying, "Thou shalt never pray in public." It's a pretty shallow interpretation of that passage. If you continue reading, Jesus goes on to lead the crowd in what is known by some as "The Lord's Prayer." ("Our father...") You're wrong, and it's a completely ignorant notion.
2012-04-24 12:49:33 PM
1 votes:
EWreckedSean: Actually it will. Catholicism especially involves the following of sacraments, which require church infrastructure outside of praying alone in your room.

Then the priest can get off of his fat, lazy, kiddie-diddling ass and go to your house to help you with your symbolic cannibalism.
2012-04-24 12:36:44 PM
1 votes:
Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. All religious institutions should be taxed.

If anybody wants to convince me otherwise, you'll first have to convince these idiots (and the Baptist idiots, and the Mormon idiots...) to get out of politics completely. No more laws pulled straight from their personal interpretations of the Bible, no more campaign contributions or fundraisers, no more election-year "If you really love God, you'll vote GOP" pamphlets in the mail.
2012-04-24 12:36:12 PM
1 votes:
Oh, look, it's a thread about Catholics on FARK.

i2.photobucket.com
2012-04-24 12:33:02 PM
1 votes:
EWreckedSean: Lord_Baull: EWreckedSean: Please quote the part of said amendment you refer to that says what you think it says.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"


Bwahahahahahahaaaaa! So, because the gov't can't establish a religion, and persons can worship anyone they choose, that makes it illegal to tax a church business. Tard.

Yes actually, it does. What happens if a religion can't afford to pay it's taxes genius?



You keep saying "religion." How does one tax a religion?
i13.photobucket.com
2012-04-24 12:31:19 PM
1 votes:
EWreckedSean: tnpir: EWreckedSean: 1st amendment, and yes. As soon as you start taxing churches, you've violated the free exercise clause.

You CANNOT be serious. Dare I ask how you reached that conclusion? Or do you have the same GED in Law as our resident legal expert clown?

Try and understand this. I'll say it slowly. Once you put a tax requirement on a religion, you've made religion a pay to play organization, which is a violation of free exercise.



Try and understand this. Taxing a CHURCH (note, not a religion) that engages in non-religious activities - like, I don't know, let's say politics - does not keep you from believing in that religion. You're still FREE TO EXERCISE YOUR RELIGION.
2012-04-24 12:28:39 PM
1 votes:
I might add that Obama won New York with a 26.9 % margin. NY is over 40% Catholic.
2012-04-24 12:25:11 PM
1 votes:
EWreckedSean: turbidum: EWreckedSean: chaoswolf: EWreckedSean: As soon as the free amendment is over turned.

wut?

If you're attempting to state that we would have to overturn the 1st amendment which gives us freedom of speech and freedom from the establishment of a state religion and the right to worship as we see fit in order to tax the businesses called churches, then you're a moron.

1st amendment, and yes. As soon as you start taxing churches, you've violated the free exercise clause.

[iseewhatyoudidthere.jpg]

Yep, I was thinking free exercise clause of the first amendment and typed free amendment. Oh well.


How would removing tax-exempt status prevent you from practicing whatever religion you choose?
2012-04-24 12:25:05 PM
1 votes:
Florida--only 26% Catholic, won by Obama in 2008
Ohio--only 21% Catholic, won by Obama in 2008
Colorado--only 19% Catholic, won by Obama in 2008
Iowa--23% Catholic, won by Obama in 2008

Any other deeply burning concerns you would like to voice?
2012-04-24 12:18:16 PM
1 votes:
Animatronik: Urbn: Animatronik: Urbn: RandomExcess: Liberals fail to realize that women in the US care about the economy and health care and are not as concerned with contraception and funded childcare.

Yes, keep going with this. It's a winner. The GOP should totally keep pushing anti-women's health and reproductive rights legislation all across the country while touting their ZERO accomplishments and almost complete avoidance of dealing with the country's economy over the last few years.

I dont think "free birth control for all" is gonna win it for Barry O this round. Too much circus and not enough bread.

I also notice you didn't touch on the lack of accomplishments for the GOP on the economy front so I'm glad to see we're in agreement there. ;)

Also, limiting access to birth control is far from the only GOP attack against women's healthcare/reproductive rights over the last 2 years.

This isnt about access and you know it.

Its about King Obamas Edict That All Shall Pay for Womens Hormonal Birth Control and Next Day Abortions.

So it is written and so it shall be done.


/ I doubt we agree on anything; not evn th imprtance of vwels.


Keep going with this. It's good. It's sure to win the hearts and minds of swing voters, independents (the real ones, not the Fark ones), and even liberals this November!
2012-04-24 12:15:57 PM
1 votes:
EWreckedSean: 1st amendment, and yes. As soon as you start taxing churches, you've violated the free exercise clause.

You CANNOT be serious. Dare I ask how you reached that conclusion? Or do you have the same GED in Law as our resident legal expert clown?
2012-04-24 12:13:39 PM
1 votes:
The poll in question:
http://www.pewforum.org/Politics-and-Elections/more-see-too-much-reli g ious-talk-by-politicians.aspx?src=prc-headline

I assume there was no link in TFA since the actual results of the poll contradict the story.

Oh Noes, only 42% of catholics think the administration is 'friendly' towards religion, compared to 25% who thinks it is "unfriendly." That means President Obama has a mere mere 17% margin. How will Obama survive?

/Also, that poll found that 54% of americans thoyught that "Churches should keep out of political matters".
2012-04-24 12:12:49 PM
1 votes:
I alone am best: qorkfiend: EWreckedSean: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.

When do these political organizations lose their tax exempt status?

As soon as the free amendment is over turned.

Which amendment is tax exemption guaranteed under?

The first. It was common law long before churches had to be 501c3 orginizations which only happened in the mid 50's.


Please quote the part of said amendment you refer to that says what you think it says.
2012-04-24 12:12:48 PM
1 votes:
Animatronik: Lord_Baull: RandomExcess: Liberals fail to realize that women in the US care about the economy and health care and are not as concerned with contraception and funded childcare.

If you were really concerned about contraception as a health care issue you'd be pushing for free condoms, because that's the only part of this discussion that relates to health.

You're not really interested un health care in this issue and neither is Sebelius. Its just politics in the Democratic Party in an election year.


You're right, the Democratic Party was completely unprepared to fight a battle they won in the 1960s.
2012-04-24 12:10:53 PM
1 votes:
Urbn: He's not going to lose Colorado. I know we have some anti-tax crusaders and the religious nutters around the Springs, but they are not a majority in this state (not that we're majority libby-lib either, mind you). Most people here are sick of the social conservatives - we're a practical people who don't have a lot of patience for this much shenanigans and nosing into everyone's personal business. Witness the slaughter at the polls the last few times they've introduced Personhood as a ballot initiative, for example.

You're right. As a native Coloradan, I would be perfectly happy if Colorado Springs and Grand Junction would just secede and form their own little Jesusland enclaves.
2012-04-24 12:09:09 PM
1 votes:
Animatronik: Urbn: RandomExcess: Liberals fail to realize that women in the US care about the economy and health care and are not as concerned with contraception and funded childcare.

Yes, keep going with this. It's a winner. The GOP should totally keep pushing anti-women's health and reproductive rights legislation all across the country while touting their ZERO accomplishments and almost complete avoidance of dealing with the country's economy over the last few years.

I dont think "free birth control for all" is gonna win it for Barry O this round. Too much circus and not enough bread.


I also notice you didn't touch on the lack of accomplishments for the GOP on the economy front so I'm glad to see we're in agreement there. ;)

Also, limiting access to birth control is far from the only GOP attack against women's healthcare/reproductive rights over the last 2 years.
2012-04-24 12:06:44 PM
1 votes:
Democrats want voters this year to focus on what they have branded a war on women, but the flip side of the debate - the so-called war on religion - is not going away anytime soon.

That's a nice way of admitting that religion is often anti-woman.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

"It's not just Catholics that are against the contraception mandate. I think you'll see a lot more people troubled by this. If this goes through, there's no stopping what's next," he said. "It's all about all the religious freedom issues, from putting God into the Pledge of Allegiance to putting 'In God we trust' on money."


Isn't forcing God into secular activity the OPPOSITE of religious freedom?
2012-04-24 12:06:04 PM
1 votes:
Animatronik: Urbn: RandomExcess: Liberals fail to realize that women in the US care about the economy and health care and are not as concerned with contraception and funded childcare.

Yes, keep going with this. It's a winner. The GOP should totally keep pushing anti-women's health and reproductive rights legislation all across the country while touting their ZERO accomplishments and almost complete avoidance of dealing with the country's economy over the last few years.

I dont think "free birth control for all" is gonna win it for Barry O this round. Too much circus and not enough bread.


Good thing that isn't what anyone is running on. Paying for health insurance =/= getting stuff for free
2012-04-24 12:05:06 PM
1 votes:
You know what is losing Catholics faster than Obama?

The Catholic Church.
2012-04-24 11:58:36 AM
1 votes:
RandomExcess: Liberals fail to realize that women in the US care about the economy and health care and are not as concerned with contraception and funded childcare.

Yes, keep going with this. It's a winner. The GOP should totally keep pushing anti-women's health and reproductive rights legislation all across the country while touting their ZERO accomplishments and almost complete avoidance of dealing with the country's economy over the last few years.
2012-04-24 11:55:55 AM
1 votes:
I alone am best: Why would they have to pay taxes?

Why should any organization get a special exemption?
2012-04-24 11:55:54 AM
1 votes:
I alone am best: Why would they have to pay taxes?

Because they own land and have income. What makes them so farking special?
2012-04-24 11:55:23 AM
1 votes:
GAT_00: ginandbacon: GAT_00: And yet I keep hearing that Catholics here are progressive and don't listen to Rome.

You're as bad as the Fundies.

Don't confuse the Bishops with the laity.

What's the big difference?


The laity is very liberal/progressive on social issues and the Bishops are decidedly not. Both of them have a basic commitment to not ramping up defense spending and increasing spending on things like education and health care, but the laity tends to be way ahead of the Bishops on issues like women's reproductive health, rights for the LBGT community, and the rights of women within the Church.

Individual Catholic voters are not represented by the USCCB in terms of their political views. But most Catholics will not speak out in public against the Bishops. It's sort of considered tacky. That doesn't mean their vote comes from the pulpit on Sunday. Catholics are one of the least obedient congregations.
2012-04-24 11:51:00 AM
1 votes:
There once was a Lady from Drew
who said,
as the Bishop withdrew,

The Vicar is quicker and slicker and thicker
and 4 inches longer than you!
2012-04-24 11:46:36 AM
1 votes:
Dusk-You-n-Me: Link

Well that was interesting.

"51% of the public say that religious conservatives have too much control over the Republican Party."

"Since 2010, there have been sizable increases in the percentages of white mainline Protestants, white Catholics and the religiously unaffiliated saying that there has been too much discussion of religion by political leaders."

And most significantly: "A majority of Americans (54%) say that churches and other houses of worship should keep out of political matters, while 40% say they should express their views on social and political questions. After a decade in which the balance of opinion tilted in the opposite direction, this is the third consecutive survey in the past four years in which more people say churches should keep out of politics than say churches should express their views on social and political issues."

Keep farking that clucker.
2012-04-24 11:23:09 AM
1 votes:
GAT_00: And yet I keep hearing that Catholics here are progressive and don't listen to Rome.

You're as bad as the Fundies.


Don't confuse the Bishops with the laity.
2012-04-24 11:13:21 AM
1 votes:
And yet I keep hearing that Catholics here are progressive and don't listen to Rome.

You're as bad as the Fundies.
2012-04-24 10:51:50 AM
1 votes:
ginandbacon: Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.

You're not suggesting that religious bodies that actively engage in politicking should, I don't know, have to pay taxes, are you?


I'm suggesting they politely shut the fark up. And take a moment to appreciate how the separation clause is there to protect them and their interests as much as it is to insulate our governance from theocrats.

If that fails, then taxes.
2012-04-24 10:47:14 AM
1 votes:
Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.


You're not suggesting that religious bodies that actively engage in politicking should, I don't know, have to pay taxes, are you?
2012-04-24 10:45:01 AM
1 votes:
In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.


And speaking of encroachment.
2012-04-24 10:38:52 AM
1 votes:
Aarontology: Go and protest women having access to health care. Do it.

And especially make sure you admonish the 98% of Catholic women that will use birth control in their lifetimes. That'll be sure to help.
2012-04-24 10:36:34 AM
1 votes:
Aarontology: Go ahead US Council of Catholic Bishops.

Go and protest women having access to health care. Do it.


Bring it. Seriously.
 
Displayed 44 of 44 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report