If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Hill)   "If Obama continues to lose Catholics by the margin the Pew poll suggests, that means he could lose the key swing states of Florida, Ohio, Colorado and Iowa"   (thehill.com) divider line 394
    More: Obvious, Obama administration, pew poll, Catholic Association, Iowa, Ohio, Catholics, Colorado, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops  
•       •       •

1260 clicks; posted to Politics » on 24 Apr 2012 at 11:48 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



394 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-04-24 10:34:16 AM
Go ahead US Council of Catholic Bishops.

Go and protest women having access to health care. Do it.
 
2012-04-24 10:36:34 AM
Aarontology: Go ahead US Council of Catholic Bishops.

Go and protest women having access to health care. Do it.


Bring it. Seriously.
 
2012-04-24 10:38:52 AM
Aarontology: Go and protest women having access to health care. Do it.

And especially make sure you admonish the 98% of Catholic women that will use birth control in their lifetimes. That'll be sure to help.
 
2012-04-24 10:45:01 AM
In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.


And speaking of encroachment.
 
2012-04-24 10:47:14 AM
Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.


You're not suggesting that religious bodies that actively engage in politicking should, I don't know, have to pay taxes, are you?
 
2012-04-24 10:49:37 AM
Instead of confronting protestors with a police presence, just send IRS lawyers to each protest with a stack of tax bills for each parish and diocese that is participating.

If you're going to use the pulpit to gin up votes, then you better look like paying some farking taxes.
 
2012-04-24 10:51:50 AM
ginandbacon: Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.

You're not suggesting that religious bodies that actively engage in politicking should, I don't know, have to pay taxes, are you?


I'm suggesting they politely shut the fark up. And take a moment to appreciate how the separation clause is there to protect them and their interests as much as it is to insulate our governance from theocrats.

If that fails, then taxes.
 
2012-04-24 10:52:59 AM
I'm Catholic. I will very likely vote for Obama unless it turns out that he's a Reptloid.

And even then, might end up as a coin flip.
 
2012-04-24 10:53:10 AM
Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.


When do these political organizations lose their tax exempt status?
 
2012-04-24 10:54:51 AM
Diogenes: ginandbacon: Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.

You're not suggesting that religious bodies that actively engage in politicking should, I don't know, have to pay taxes, are you?

I'm suggesting they politely shut the fark up. And take a moment to appreciate how the separation clause is there to protect them and their interests as much as it is to insulate our governance from theocrats.

If that fails, then taxes.


Pretty sure I could live with either outcome.
 
2012-04-24 10:57:33 AM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.

When do these political organizations lose their tax exempt status?


After the election, if ever. There is zero chance that Obama would make a single move against religions using the church as a political tool. Not before the election for certain, because you can just see the media running with the "Obama comes out against churches" angle and obfuscate the details of the situation. If he wants to lose the election, that is what he should do. Otherwise, maybe wait until the election is over, and assuming he wins bring out all the evidence saying "Such and such church used its influence for political purposes, they will be taxed henceforth."
 
2012-04-24 11:00:20 AM
Shostie: I'm Catholic. I will very likely vote for Obama unless it turns out that he's a Reptloid.

And even then, might end up as a coin flip.


It would make for a much more interesting election.

"TUESDAY, TUESDAY, TUESDAY! Come see RomneyBot 3000 battle Reptobama in a smack down royale for the soul of the country! He's got circuits and a capacity to dispatch his challengers with cold, emotionless precision. He's got an impenetrable armor of scales capable of deflecting the most ridiculous and withering assault, and a forked tongue that will charm you as it indoctrinates you with his liberal ideals."
 
2012-04-24 11:04:14 AM
Elandriel: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.

When do these political organizations lose their tax exempt status?

After the election, if ever. There is zero chance that Obama would make a single move against religions using the church as a political tool. Not before the election for certain, because you can just see the media running with the "Obama comes out against churches" angle and obfuscate the details of the situation. If he wants to lose the election, that is what he should do. Otherwise, maybe wait until the election is over, and assuming he wins bring out all the evidence saying "Such and such church used its influence for political purposes, they will be taxed henceforth."


Yeah... rhetorical question
It pisses me off that churches can get away with being overtly political and still flaunt their tax-free status. If they want to be political, then pay the same ticket price the rest of us do.
 
2012-04-24 11:06:55 AM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: It pisses me off that churches can get away with being overtly political and still flaunt their tax-free status. If they want to be political, then pay the same ticket price the rest of us do.

Or at the very least, incorporate a political/influence peddling arm and be taxed on that.

I'm sure these medical institutions they run have to pay the government in some form or fashion.
 
2012-04-24 11:13:21 AM
And yet I keep hearing that Catholics here are progressive and don't listen to Rome.

You're as bad as the Fundies.
 
2012-04-24 11:23:09 AM
GAT_00: And yet I keep hearing that Catholics here are progressive and don't listen to Rome.

You're as bad as the Fundies.


Don't confuse the Bishops with the laity.
 
2012-04-24 11:23:51 AM
Shostie: I'm Catholic. I will very likely vote for Obama unless it turns out that he's a Reptloid.

And even then, might end up as a coin flip.


static.tumblr.com
 
2012-04-24 11:27:20 AM
Came in for Pew Pew, leaving disappointed.
 
2012-04-24 11:31:13 AM
ginandbacon: Bring it. Seriously.

There's no way this could backfire.

unyon: And especially make sure you admonish the 98% of Catholic women that will use birth control in their lifetimes. That'll be sure to help.

Oh, definitely. No way that'll lead to fewer people in the pews.
 
2012-04-24 11:32:26 AM
And he'd lose Catholics...why?

Because of the contraception issue? That nearly all of the Catholics (that aren't the ones running the church) are on Obama's side of the issue? That issue?

Give me a break.
 
2012-04-24 11:32:36 AM
Did you know that disco record sales are up 400% for the year ending 1976? If these trends continue...
 
2012-04-24 11:37:00 AM
 
2012-04-24 11:38:39 AM
Aarontology: ginandbacon: Bring it. Seriously.

There's no way this could backfire.


Oh no. It's a sure thing. They should DEFINITELY run with this.
 
2012-04-24 11:39:45 AM
Ignoring for a moment how much of a losing proposition it is to rail against access to contraception, Obama has what you would call a firewall with Catholics in the form of the Hispanic vote. The people getting asspained by this contraception deal are primarily evangelical protestants, not Catholics, and they weren't voting for Obama to begin with.
 
2012-04-24 11:41:19 AM
Fark It: Ignoring for a moment how much of a losing proposition it is to rail against access to contraception, Obama has what you would call a firewall with Catholics in the form of the Hispanic vote. The people getting asspained by this contraception deal are primarily evangelical protestants, not Catholics, and they weren't voting for Obama to begin with.

Good point.
 
2012-04-24 11:43:06 AM
ginandbacon: GAT_00: And yet I keep hearing that Catholics here are progressive and don't listen to Rome.

You're as bad as the Fundies.

Don't confuse the Bishops with the laity.


What's the big difference?
 
2012-04-24 11:46:36 AM
Dusk-You-n-Me: Link

Well that was interesting.

"51% of the public say that religious conservatives have too much control over the Republican Party."

"Since 2010, there have been sizable increases in the percentages of white mainline Protestants, white Catholics and the religiously unaffiliated saying that there has been too much discussion of religion by political leaders."

And most significantly: "A majority of Americans (54%) say that churches and other houses of worship should keep out of political matters, while 40% say they should express their views on social and political questions. After a decade in which the balance of opinion tilted in the opposite direction, this is the third consecutive survey in the past four years in which more people say churches should keep out of politics than say churches should express their views on social and political issues."

Keep farking that clucker.
 
2012-04-24 11:49:23 AM
ginandbacon: GAT_00: And yet I keep hearing that Catholics here are progressive and don't listen to Rome.

You're as bad as the Fundies.

Don't confuse the Bishops with the laity.


Whyever not?
 
2012-04-24 11:51:00 AM
There once was a Lady from Drew
who said,
as the Bishop withdrew,

The Vicar is quicker and slicker and thicker
and 4 inches longer than you!
 
2012-04-24 11:51:06 AM
here's my prediction from yesterday in the thread about Obama gaining in swing states:

The polls and speculation from the media who seems desperate for a close race and will try to do anything they can to get one is not reliable. The media was telling us 2008 was going to be close too all the way up to the end when Obama crushed McCain by 10 million votes. Later today we will have an article about how Obama is in trouble, the constant back and forth is what keeps people tuned in.

I was wrong, it took a whole day...
 
2012-04-24 11:51:31 AM
Eh, I'll just leave Catholicism. Oh wait, I already have.
 
2012-04-24 11:51:51 AM
Fark It: Ignoring for a moment how much of a losing proposition it is to rail against access to contraception, Obama has what you would call a firewall with Catholics in the form of the Hispanic vote. The people getting asspained by this contraception deal are primarily evangelical protestants, not Catholics, and they weren't voting for Obama to begin with.

This
 
2012-04-24 11:52:04 AM
Wasn't so long ago that the GOP was questioning a Catholic's loyalty to the nation.
 
2012-04-24 11:52:52 AM
Diogenes: ginandbacon: Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.

You're not suggesting that religious bodies that actively engage in politicking should, I don't know, have to pay taxes, are you?

I'm suggesting they politely shut the fark up. And take a moment to appreciate how the separation clause is there to protect them and their interests as much as it is to insulate our governance from theocrats.

If that fails, then taxes.


Why would they have to pay taxes? The church can mess with the government all they want. I was unaware that they were bound by the constitution to stay out of it. Oh wait, they are not bound by constitutional limitations where the government is.
 
2012-04-24 11:54:07 AM
After covering up child rape for decades, these farks expect us to take political cues from them?

Fark you, ya farkin' mackerel snapping bead mumblers.
 
2012-04-24 11:54:15 AM
He's not going to lose Colorado. I know we have some anti-tax crusaders and the religious nutters around the Springs, but they are not a majority in this state (not that we're majority libby-lib either, mind you). Most people here are sick of the social conservatives - we're a practical people who don't have a lot of patience for this much shenanigans and nosing into everyone's personal business. Witness the slaughter at the polls the last few times they've introduced Personhood as a ballot initiative, for example.
 
2012-04-24 11:54:19 AM
Grand_Moff_Joseph: Instead of confronting protestors with a police presence, just send IRS lawyers to each protest with a stack of tax bills for each parish and diocese that is participating.

If you're going to use the pulpit to gin up votes, then you better look like paying some farking taxes.


The only problem is that this will never happen.

First, neither the GOP nor the Democrats wants to that Pandora's Box open; both sides have too many friendly tax-exempt organizations who might be adversely affected by it.

Second, it would be very difficult (if not impossible) to avoid the appearance of political persecution, especially since these things always pop up during election years; coupled with #1, it wouldn't be long before it actually becomes political persecution.
 
2012-04-24 11:55:05 AM
Catholics make up less than 20% Coloradoans and many of those Catholics are brown. I don't think they will swing Repub in enough extra numbers to flip Colorado red this year. Colorado could go red this year, but it won't be because of the Catholic vote.
 
2012-04-24 11:55:23 AM
GAT_00: ginandbacon: GAT_00: And yet I keep hearing that Catholics here are progressive and don't listen to Rome.

You're as bad as the Fundies.

Don't confuse the Bishops with the laity.

What's the big difference?


The laity is very liberal/progressive on social issues and the Bishops are decidedly not. Both of them have a basic commitment to not ramping up defense spending and increasing spending on things like education and health care, but the laity tends to be way ahead of the Bishops on issues like women's reproductive health, rights for the LBGT community, and the rights of women within the Church.

Individual Catholic voters are not represented by the USCCB in terms of their political views. But most Catholics will not speak out in public against the Bishops. It's sort of considered tacky. That doesn't mean their vote comes from the pulpit on Sunday. Catholics are one of the least obedient congregations.
 
2012-04-24 11:55:43 AM
HotWingConspiracy: Wasn't so long ago that the GOP was questioning a Catholic's loyalty to the nation.

Hell, the Evangelicals didn't even consider Catholics to be Christian until they thought they could turn them against Obama.
 
2012-04-24 11:55:54 AM
I alone am best: Why would they have to pay taxes?

Because they own land and have income. What makes them so farking special?
 
2012-04-24 11:55:55 AM
I alone am best: Why would they have to pay taxes?

Why should any organization get a special exemption?
 
2012-04-24 11:56:01 AM
Liberals fail to realize that women in the US care about the economy and health care and are not as concerned with contraception and funded childcare.
 
2012-04-24 11:57:03 AM
GameSprocket: HotWingConspiracy: Wasn't so long ago that the GOP was questioning a Catholic's loyalty to the nation.

Hell, the Evangelicals didn't even consider Catholics to be Christian until they thought they could turn them against Obama.


Mormons too. Hatred of black people is an amazing unifier.
 
2012-04-24 11:58:36 AM
RandomExcess: Liberals fail to realize that women in the US care about the economy and health care and are not as concerned with contraception and funded childcare.

Yes, keep going with this. It's a winner. The GOP should totally keep pushing anti-women's health and reproductive rights legislation all across the country while touting their ZERO accomplishments and almost complete avoidance of dealing with the country's economy over the last few years.
 
2012-04-24 11:58:41 AM
RandomExcess: Liberals fail to realize that women in the US care about the economy and health care and are not as concerned with contraception and funded childcare.

Yeah, women are concerned about health care, not issues directly related to health care for them and their families!
 
2012-04-24 11:59:29 AM
When you stop raping children, I will start to think about giving a damn about your opinion.
 
2012-04-24 11:59:48 AM
To: Steve Schulin; Gelato; BlackElk

Mitt Romney's role, should he be elected, is to consolidate the socialist gains of Barack Obama, and to secure the gains of the sodomite lobby as well. Including in our military.

4 posted on Tuesday, April 24, 2012 11:27:59 AM by EternalVigilance ('A man with God is always in the majority.' -- John Knox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
 
2012-04-24 11:59:55 AM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: Diogenes: In late January, priests in scores of churches across the country read letters from the pulpit urging congregants to contact members of Congress to oppose the new rule.

Larry Cirignano, a Catholic activist, said evangelical groups such as the Christian Coalition had sent out direct mail to raise money to push back against the Obama administration.

And speaking of encroachment.

When do these political organizations lose their tax exempt status?


As soon as the free amendment is over turned.
 
2012-04-24 12:00:48 PM
Grand_Moff_Joseph: Instead of confronting protestors with a police presence, just send IRS lawyers to each protest with a stack of tax bills for each parish and diocese that is participating.

If you're going to use the pulpit to gin up votes, then you better look like paying some farking taxes.


That would be true if they engage in campaigning for a candidate.

Objecting to the current administrations abuses does not qualify.


Please keep trying, though. It really helps to frame the debate clearly in terms of antireligious groups.
 
Displayed 50 of 394 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report