If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   AZ legislature passes law demanding the federal government turn over title to 48,000 sq miles of federally owned land in the state. Federal government promises to get right on that the second the Federal Supremacy Clause is repealed   (news.yahoo.com) divider line 198
    More: Asinine, Governor Jan Brewer, Arizona, state senate, Sierra Club, Arizona House of Representatives, animal husbandry, Bureau of Land Management, land run  
•       •       •

3387 clicks; posted to Politics » on 24 Apr 2012 at 3:14 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



198 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-04-24 04:12:36 PM
You know, I always thought that it would be pretty much impossible to find an elected body more stupid and ridiculous than the Detroit city council, but Arizona's House is really giving it a go.
 
2012-04-24 04:17:50 PM
colon_pow: mcwehrle: FTFA:

"They see the government as too closely aligned with environmental groups, which largely oppose efforts by the so-called sagebrush rebels to loosen federal controls." BLACK PEOPLE!!!



"All of these federal agencies have been infiltrated by extreme environmentalists BLACK PEOPLE and have almost killed off what Arizona was built on - lumber, mining and ranching," HATING ON BLACK PEOPLE said Republican state Senator Al Melvin, the bill's chief sponsor. "It's wrong and it's happening all over the West. We are bound and determined to put it to an end to this."


ftf HIM....

we get it, they're black.

we get it. you're obsessed with race.


you're too late....I already answered another.

read the whole thread.

do it for the lulz
 
2012-04-24 04:22:22 PM
GQueue: You know, I always thought that it would be pretty much impossible to find an elected body more stupid and ridiculous than the Detroit city council, but Arizona's House is really giving it a go.

Oh come on, the Texas and Florida legislatures as well as all of Wi's government reject your premise.
 
2012-04-24 04:28:11 PM
cman: thomps: cman: Sigh

The left v right battle continues to fall into idiotic territory and it is we the people who lose.

i'm sorry, where in this proposed bill is the left represented?

The fact that this shiat never happened until Obama came into the White House indicates that it is a left v right battle.


Law and Order was never cancelled until Obama came into the White House. This destruction of legendary tv shows is clearly a left v right battle.
 
2012-04-24 04:29:21 PM
verbaltoxin: Proponents of the Arizona bill have complained that federal control puts too much land off-limits to commercial development such as mining, logging and livestock raising -- limiting the state's potential tax base for schools and other public services.

Translation: "Waaa!! We wanna strip mine the f*ck outta the Rockies and you won't let us!"

Conservationists say less federal management would lead to degradation of the land and its wildlife while allowing a virtual giveaway of publicly owned natural resources.

This and more in this month's issue of "DUH."


Funny that the anti-tax crowd is complaining the states potential tax base is being limited. They have no issue cutting school budgets to save taxpayers money, yet are now whining they are loosing potential tax money.
 
2012-04-24 04:29:38 PM
YouWinAgainGravity: cman: thomps: cman: Sigh

The left v right battle continues to fall into idiotic territory and it is we the people who lose.

i'm sorry, where in this proposed bill is the left represented?

The fact that this shiat never happened until Obama came into the White House indicates that it is a left v right battle.

Law and Order was never cancelled until Obama came into the White House. This destruction of legendary tv shows is clearly a left v right battle.


He's simply saying that once the Right was out of power, they made noise about all of this crap. They politicized something that wasn't a political issue before.
 
2012-04-24 04:32:41 PM
mcwehrle: colon_pow: mcwehrle: FTFA:

"They see the government as too closely aligned with environmental groups, which largely oppose efforts by the so-called sagebrush rebels to loosen federal controls." BLACK PEOPLE!!!



"All of these federal agencies have been infiltrated by extreme environmentalists BLACK PEOPLE and have almost killed off what Arizona was built on - lumber, mining and ranching," HATING ON BLACK PEOPLE said Republican state Senator Al Melvin, the bill's chief sponsor. "It's wrong and it's happening all over the West. We are bound and determined to put it to an end to this."


ftf HIM....

we get it, they're black.

we get it. you're obsessed with race.

you're too late....I already answered another.

read the whole thread.

do it for the lulz


yep. i saw where you mentioned that you were doing it for Mrs. Obama or something like that...
you're a knight in shining armor, for sure.
keep up the good work.
 
2012-04-24 04:33:44 PM
What Arizona, and other states should do...send the Feds a property tax bill...since they "own" the land. Feds refuse to pay....seize the land.

Nothing prevents a local government or entity from seizing property when arrears in tax.

The Feds do not have the manpower or resources to fight each state
 
2012-04-24 04:35:00 PM
Freaking Tenthers.

Speaking of which, I just heard that an important reason the Tenth Amendment was ratified was to insure the federal government did not infringe upon states rights...to protect the institution of SLAVERY.

If the states aren't paying to maintain the land, then they need to just STFU and GBTW solving the real problems facing their citizens.
 
2012-04-24 04:35:40 PM
Good luck with that.

I'm am amazed that conservatives and conservationists are not more aligned.
 
2012-04-24 04:37:02 PM
Nadie_AZ: YouWinAgainGravity: cman: thomps: cman: Sigh

The left v right battle continues to fall into idiotic territory and it is we the people who lose.

i'm sorry, where in this proposed bill is the left represented?

The fact that this shiat never happened until Obama came into the White House indicates that it is a left v right battle.

Law and Order was never cancelled until Obama came into the White House. This destruction of legendary tv shows is clearly a left v right battle.

He's simply saying that once the Right was out of power, they made noise about all of this crap. They politicized something that wasn't a political issue before.


right, but it was a political issue before. it has been since at least the 1970s. it's crazy people being crazy when they have the opportunity to be crazy.
 
2012-04-24 04:37:36 PM
UCFRoadWarrior: What Arizona, and other states should do...send the Feds a property tax bill...since they "own" the land. Feds refuse to pay....seize the land.

Nothing prevents a local government or entity from seizing property when arrears in tax.

The Feds do not have the manpower or resources to fight each state
I'm a dumbass that doesn't understand how taxes or jurisdiction works


FTFY
 
2012-04-24 04:38:18 PM
EyeballKid: Let's just give Arizona back to Mexico, already.

Better yet, let's let them declare independence and fail on their own.
 
2012-04-24 04:41:47 PM
WhackingDay: The federal government owns nearly the entire state of NV? I know that most of that state is mountains and desert, but even so, that just doesn't seem possible.

It was sparsely populated to start, and then it was found to have lots of silver so the Feds wanted that, so they didn't release their old territorial possessions for private use, and then the Feds further discovered that enormous swaths of uninhabited desert are terribly well-suited to testing experimental munitions and aircraft.

The Feds might sell/release some of their holdings here and there someday, but Nevada belongs to Uncle Sam so long as Uncle Sam exists.

Same goes for Alaska, but in re: petroleum.
 
2012-04-24 04:49:55 PM
AZ, you might want to sweeten the pot... promise to educate yourselves, offer to stop being morons, that kind of thing.
 
2012-04-24 04:56:56 PM
Cinaed: AZ, you might want to sweeten the pot... promise to educate yourselves, offer to stop being morons, that kind of thing.

Some of us try. They don't listen. Being white is more important than being right.
 
2012-04-24 04:58:48 PM
Mikey1969: then try and sell it to mining and oil companies, and turn around and take the money

If it was worth anything to oil/mining companies... wouldn't the federal government already have sold it to them?
 
2012-04-24 05:03:03 PM
rosebud_the_sled: I call BS on the "we need to build more schools" argument coming from Arizona. The only time a Republican would want to build a school is if it was a Christian madras.

Not necessarily. The proponent of the bill, regardless of the party, might have a big construction firm as a donor.
 
2012-04-24 05:11:53 PM
Satanic_Hamster: rosebud_the_sled: I call BS on the "we need to build more schools" argument coming from Arizona. The only time a Republican would want to build a school is if it was a Christian madras.

Not necessarily. The proponent of the bill, regardless of the party, might have a big construction firm as a donor.


Might?

Ok, it's not construction firms, but Utah has a lot of rare earth metals in recoverable concentrations on federal land. Arizona might have similar deposits.

It's all about freeing it up for development, whether construction of new homes or mines or other industry.
 
2012-04-24 05:12:55 PM
It's basically a way for the state reps, and their conservative backers, to loot the state's lands for massive profits, at the expensive of the environment and long term public good.
 
Ehh
2012-04-24 05:18:19 PM
Yeah, but when those Arizonans get their land from the federal government, and start digging for uranium even though this Indian dude tells them there's a curse on the area where they are digging, and this giant six-headed monster comes out and starts killing people and smashing all their stuff, they'll be like, "Help us, federal government!" and Obama'll be like, "See ya later, suckers!"
 
2012-04-24 05:20:09 PM
Antimatter: It's basically a way for the state reps, and their conservative backers, to loot the state's lands for massive profits, at the expensive of the environment and long term public good.

Arizona has little water. It's biggest surface water is the Colorado River. After getting Jr rights to the river, they got the CAP- Central Arizona Project. This was to bring water to Phoenix and Tucson- to offset groundwater usage and be a backup to help a parched state to quench the thirst of its citizens and farmers/ranchers.

Which is why, 2 years ago, the state ok'd the CAP to be extended to provide ... water for mining. Remember, a year later Lake Mead almost dropped so low that they turned off the CAP. They don't care about any of that. Not saying the entire government doesn't (some very much do and fight hard for the good of the people) but these jack offs who get money from ALEC do not care.
 
2012-04-24 05:33:13 PM
Nadie_AZ: Antimatter: It's basically a way for the state reps, and their conservative backers, to loot the state's lands for massive profits, at the expensive of the environment and long term public good.

Arizona has little water. It's biggest surface water is the Colorado River. After getting Jr rights to the river, they got the CAP- Central Arizona Project. This was to bring water to Phoenix and Tucson- to offset groundwater usage and be a backup to help a parched state to quench the thirst of its citizens and farmers/ranchers.

Which is why, 2 years ago, the state ok'd the CAP to be extended to provide ... water for mining. Remember, a year later Lake Mead almost dropped so low that they turned off the CAP. They don't care about any of that. Not saying the entire government doesn't (some very much do and fight hard for the good of the people) but these jack offs who get money from ALEC do not care.


It's almost like millions of people moving out to where there's no water was a bad idea or something. Strange.
 
2012-04-24 05:40:44 PM
verbaltoxin: It's almost like millions of people moving out to where there's no water was a bad idea or something. Strange.

Water politics here is so screwed up.

Example:

Arizona is a junior member of the 7 state/2 nation Colorado River Compact. California gets unlimited water based on their 'draw'. Arizona gets it's amount. Once Lake Mead drops to a certain level- Arizona loses its water. That's sorta a big deal, but it gets better- We have a nuclear power plant, here. It requires lots of water. So a lot of our waste water from the cities goes there. BUT Arizona only uses 30% of the plant for its own power usage. The rest? California. So California gets energy and free water usage from Arizona.

But don't fear- San Diego, LA, Las Vegas- they are all going back to the desert. Phoenix might survive... in smaller form.
 
2012-04-24 06:07:46 PM
When the federal government has to send lawyers to court to get stupid shiat like this overturned can they send a bill to the state in question for lawyer's fees and court costs?
 
2012-04-24 06:10:03 PM
Karac: When the federal government has to send lawyers to court to get stupid shiat like this overturned can they send a bill to the state in question for lawyer's fees and court costs?

They should bill the sponsors of the bill, the lobbyists who pushed it and the organization that wrote it.
 
2012-04-24 06:13:08 PM
Kazan: because they don't want to preserve it.. they want to turn national parks into mining pits

Except that military bases and national parks are exempted.

Fubini: Yeah, for some reason private individuals just don't feel like they want to purchase huge tracts of barren desert. Arizona, in particular, already has a water problem, what exactly do they want to do with all this land, build condos?

I'll go with what's in the article: Mining, ranching, and logging. All three take varying amounts of water, but as they're economic activities, one could force them to pay for it - whether via shipping it in, desalination, or sewage treatment.

Other options would include green energy such as wind and solar plants - photovoltiac, thermal, and algal,
 
2012-04-24 06:17:41 PM
EyeballKid: Let's just give Arizona back to Mexico, already.

Liquidating a few states would do wonders to pay off the national debt.
 
2012-04-24 06:29:24 PM
Magorn: I get election year pandering , but pandering to whom? Who is stupid enough to believe this will actually happen just because AZ says so? And if they know it won't ever happen why aren't they outraged over the waste of time and money this represents?

and if there is anyone under the illusion this will actually happen take a gander at this graphic:

[blogs-images.forbes.com image 480x395]

The federal Government owns roughly 1/3 of all the land in the US, but the vast majority of it is in the west. here are the states with the least amount of federal land
1.Connecticut 0.4%
2.Rhode Island 0.4%
3.Iowa 0.8%
4.New York 0.8%
5.Maine 1.1%
6.Kansas 1.2%
7.Nebraska 1.4%
8.Alabama 1.6%
9.Ohio 1.7%
10.Illinois 1.8%

Now look at this list of state with the most:
1.Nevada 84.5%
2.Alaska 69.1%
3.Utah 57.4%
4.Oregon 53.1%
5.Idaho 50.2%
6.Arizona 48.1%
7.California 45.3%
8.Wyoming 42.3%
9.New Mexico 41.8%
10.Colorado 36.6%


Notice a pattern on the last list? If they did it for AZ they'd have to do it for all of them.


As a Coloradan, I don't want the federal government to give up its land here. They keep the best, nicest, most well-preserved environments free for all of us... sure oil interests, frackers, and uranium miners would much rather destroy the rockies and poison my water... and they'd probably even let the state keep a couple bucks for every few million they make, but I actually like nature... sometimes government needs to act for the public good, not the private profit.
 
2012-04-24 06:29:46 PM
EyeballKid: So, it's actually in opposition to the notion that natural resources are a finite source.

Some natural resources are (metals), but many are not (timber, ranchlands, etc).
 
2012-04-24 06:31:15 PM
Bontesla: And if Obama proposed it before the bill was even introduced?

Not sure what bill you are talking about.
 
2012-04-24 06:32:04 PM
Revoke their statehood. Give it to Puerto Rico.

I'm only half joking here... States rights is this pseudo legitimate cause that really ceased to matter after 1865 or so... As far as I'm concerned, any state created from US territory after ratification of the Constitution can sit and spin. Goddamn rednecks.
 
2012-04-24 06:34:25 PM
Nadie_AZ: But don't fear- San Diego, LA, Las Vegas- they are all going back to the desert. Phoenix might survive... in smaller form.

San Diego and Los Angeles weren't deserts, only a part of Northeast L.A., the part near the desert. San Diego and Los Angeles are huge land masses and historically had rivers running through them. The San Diego River was a major water source before it was dammed up. They have natural pine forest mountains, marshes, and other features. The sparse foothills and beach scrub brush are only a small part of the natural landscape.
 
2012-04-24 06:34:29 PM
UCFRoadWarrior: Feds refuse to pay....seize the land.

Ah, but the feds do often pay. PILT
 
2012-04-24 06:45:24 PM
Nadie_AZ: They don't care about any of that.

That is not true. The mining will be first shut down before the City if the demands dictate. And don't forget the role of water reuse is starting to have in these parts of the country. Right now, about 8% to 10% of Tucon's water supply is indirect water reuse. This number will continue to grow each year.
 
2012-04-24 06:47:44 PM
firefly212: sometimes government needs to act for the public good, not the private profit.

Sometimes they can even do both.
 
2012-04-24 06:53:58 PM
YouWinAgainGravity: UCFRoadWarrior: What Arizona, and other states should do...send the Feds a property tax bill...since they "own" the land. Feds refuse to pay....seize the land.

Nothing prevents a local government or entity from seizing property when arrears in tax.

The Feds do not have the manpower or resources to fight each stateI'm a dumbass that doesn't understand how taxes or jurisdiction works

FTFY


Wow...a Constitutional genius. I am impressed
 
2012-04-24 06:55:59 PM
UCFRoadWarrior: Wow...a Constitutional genius. I am impressed

Troll moar, dumbass
 
2012-04-24 06:57:25 PM
Is this the land that include the nuclear weapons tests sites? If so, how does demanding 48000 sq miles of wasteland (in every sense of the word) create jobs.
 
2012-04-24 07:03:47 PM
fsbilly: States rights is this pseudo legitimate cause that really ceased to matter after 1865 or so...

Not quite true. There is much more to this issue than you attempt to narrow down into a small package. Not that I agree with these dumbasses in this regard because this type of legislation is not legitimate in the least. However, there are some major concerns that many of the western states have with regard to keeping much of the public land multiple use.
 
2012-04-24 07:04:06 PM
ArkPanda:

Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a diseased mind.
--Terry Pratchett



Especially when they should have been question marks!!!!

/I'm one of the 68%!!!
 
2012-04-24 07:07:13 PM
HeadLever: Nadie_AZ: They don't care about any of that.

That is not true. The mining will be first shut down before the City if the demands dictate. And don't forget the role of water reuse is starting to have in these parts of the country. Right now, about 8% to 10% of Tucon's water supply is indirect water reuse. This number will continue to grow each year.


My comment was regarding those members of ALEC in the legislature. Maybe they would. I hope so. I'm not very confident in that, however.

And yes, reuse of water should be huge. It is growing and will continue to grow.
 
2012-04-24 07:09:23 PM
SN1987a goes boom: Is this the land that include the nuclear weapons tests sites?

No. Millitary installations are not part of this. It is mostly BLM lands. And if you want to know how it can create jobs, you can always look to the natural resources industry for that answer. When those that mine, log and graze pubic lands, there are usage fees that are put in place and that money goes to the owner of the land (in this case the feds). If it were state land, most of that money would be going to the states instead. Also, local taxes cannot be applied to uses or facilities locatated on pblic land.
 
2012-04-24 07:12:38 PM
Nadie_AZ: I'm not very confident in that, however.

It would ultimatly come down to how the water rights are structured. In any cases, I don't see how the mining company could get senior water rights over a municipal entity, but I am not going to say that it is impossible.
 
2012-04-24 07:18:55 PM
Rich Cream: Got this in an email. Barely relevant beyond the mention of AZ but I do appreciate that crazy-right emailers have taken the time to learn to embed their crazy-ass font changes into a graphic; in case the email loses formatting through multiple forwards.

[img713.imageshack.us image 450x327]


I do enjoy how so many people say some (or all) of those things, and DO imply that if an illegal immigrant were in the same situation, they would not be asked for identification. They actually BELIEVE that's what happens!

I feel the intelligence being sucked from my body each day, because I always have to hear about those damn Mezzicanz tukin er jerbs, and getting free houses from the banks, free mortgages, free business, food stamps, free health care, and so forth. I hate seeing how pissed off white people get at minorities, when it's our cracker asses that are by FAR the biggest problems at all ends of the fiscal spectrum.
 
2012-04-24 07:27:34 PM
puffy999: Rich Cream: Got this in an email. Barely relevant beyond the mention of AZ but I do appreciate that crazy-right emailers have taken the time to learn to embed their crazy-ass font changes into a graphic; in case the email loses formatting through multiple forwards.

[img713.imageshack.us image 450x327]

I do enjoy how so many people say some (or all) of those things, and DO imply that if an illegal immigrant were in the same situation, they would not be asked for identification. They actually BELIEVE that's what happens!

I feel the intelligence being sucked from my body each day, because I always have to hear about those damn Mezzicanz tukin er jerbs, and getting free houses from the banks, free mortgages, free business, food stamps, free health care, and so forth. I hate seeing how pissed off white people get at minorities, when it's our cracker asses that are by FAR the biggest problems at all ends of the fiscal spectrum.


Here in Nebraska, the governor vetoed a bill which was supposed to allow the children of illegal immigrants - not the immigrants themselves, but the children who would be born here and be citizens - have state aid for pre and post natal healthcare.

It was actually overridden by a consortium of both pro lifers, and what counts for liberal in Nebraska, believe it or not. But the fact is that Gov. Dave Heineman is so deep in the pocket for businesses here that profit from undocumented workers, and want to make sure they stay under the boot where they belong, and he is trying so hard to please the "OMG Soshulizm" nuts in Nebraska, he vetoed it.

Federal politics has nothing on state politics.
 
2012-04-24 07:27:40 PM
enry: Rich Cream: Got this in an email. Barely relevant beyond the mention of AZ but I do appreciate that crazy-right emailers have taken the time to learn to embed their crazy-ass font changes into a graphic; in case the email loses formatting through multiple forwards.

[img713.imageshack.us image 450x327]

Ahh, let's see.

#1) Makes sense since it's a Drivers License.
#2) Rarely, and only because I wrote "See License" on the signature area.
#3) No
#4) No
#5) Sometimes, since it's a Drivers License
#6) No
#7) No
#8) No
#9) Only some, most prescriptions they just ask for your name and address
#10) WTF?
#11) Never on train, but it's not required for airline travel, only easier to get to your gate.


Illegals also have to show ID for the same activities as you do. So - bigtime analogy fail.
 
2012-04-24 07:48:00 PM
HeadLever: fsbilly: States rights is this pseudo legitimate cause that really ceased to matter after 1865 or so...

Not quite true. There is much more to this issue than you attempt to narrow down into a small package. Not that I agree with these dumbasses in this regard because this type of legislation is not legitimate in the least. However, there are some major concerns that many of the western states have with regard to keeping much of the public land multiple use.


Keeping land multiple use is a lot different than allowing strip mining and other disastrous practices for the benefit of some corporations. What I am saying, in a very absurdist tone, is that if AZ thinks they have the power to do this, then the US equally reserves the power to revoke their statehood.
 
2012-04-24 08:21:19 PM
firefly212: Magorn: I get election year pandering , but pandering to whom? Who is stupid enough to believe this will actually happen just because AZ says so? And if they know it won't ever happen why aren't they outraged over the waste of time and money this represents?

and if there is anyone under the illusion this will actually happen take a gander at this graphic:

[blogs-images.forbes.com image 480x395]

The federal Government owns roughly 1/3 of all the land in the US, but the vast majority of it is in the west. here are the states with the least amount of federal land
1.Connecticut 0.4%
2.Rhode Island 0.4%
3.Iowa 0.8%
4.New York 0.8%
5.Maine 1.1%
6.Kansas 1.2%
7.Nebraska 1.4%
8.Alabama 1.6%
9.Ohio 1.7%
10.Illinois 1.8%

Now look at this list of state with the most:
1.Nevada 84.5%
2.Alaska 69.1%
3.Utah 57.4%
4.Oregon 53.1%
5.Idaho 50.2%
6.Arizona 48.1%
7.California 45.3%
8.Wyoming 42.3%
9.New Mexico 41.8%
10.Colorado 36.6%


Notice a pattern on the last list? If they did it for AZ they'd have to do it for all of them.

As a Coloradan, I don't want the federal government to give up its land here. They keep the best, nicest, most well-preserved environments free for all of us... sure oil interests, frackers, and uranium miners would much rather destroy the rockies and poison my water... and they'd probably even let the state keep a couple bucks for every few million they make, but I actually like nature... sometimes government needs to act for the public good, not the private profit.


Two words: "mountaintop removal"

In WV they got tired of actually digging MINES to get at the coal they want so now they just set charges and literally blast the tops off mountains. Check this before and after picture:
farm3.static.flickr.com
If the Rockies were privately owned like most of the Appalachians you bet your ass they do the same thing out ther
 
2012-04-24 08:26:28 PM
HeadLever: SN1987a goes boom: Is this the land that include the nuclear weapons tests sites?

No. Millitary installations are not part of this. It is mostly BLM lands. And if you want to know how it can create jobs, you can always look to the natural resources industry for that answer. When those that mine, log and graze pubic lands, there are usage fees that are put in place and that money goes to the owner of the land (in this case the feds). If it were state land, most of that money would be going to the states instead. Also, local taxes cannot be applied to uses or facilities locatated on pblic land.


Well, my favorite piece of BLM land:
sattlers.org

generates about $600K in usage fees to the BLM for one week, but the local nigh-ghost towns get tons of money pumped into their economy via the general store/gas station and the state and county make a tidy profit making the event pay all the OT for their deputies/state troopers and EMT/fire personnel the BLM requires in the rental contract
 
Displayed 50 of 198 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report