If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Mother Jones)   Meet some of the country's biggest media companies, which own dozens of newspapers and TV news operations that are lobbying against transparency   (motherjones.com) divider line 15
    More: Interesting, National Association of Broadcasters, E.W. Scripps Co., The Washington Post Company, Barrington Broadcasting, ProPublica, Austin American-Statesman, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, NBC News  
•       •       •

1515 clicks; posted to Politics » on 23 Apr 2012 at 8:42 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



15 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-04-23 07:19:32 PM
I can see the media's view on this. If I'm selling ad space to various for-profit companies, letting them know my rock-bottom price is NOT a good business practice.
 
2012-04-23 07:40:01 PM
Lord Jubjub: I can see the media's view on this. If I'm selling ad space to various for-profit companies, letting them know my rock-bottom price is NOT a good business practice.

Too bad that they're suppressing information that's critical to the efficient operation of markets... not that such suppression is anything ~new~ in our bastardized economic wonderland, but still...

/would be nice if everyone would recall that business is just a mechanism to serve consumer demand
//hopefully, someday, our progeny will look back at this era of industrial cocksucking with the contempt it deserves
 
2012-04-23 08:21:58 PM
Lord Jubjub: I can see the media's view on this. If I'm selling ad space to various for-profit companies, letting them know my rock-bottom price is NOT a good business practice.

i can't imagine that political advertisers in an election year represent the rock-bottom price that local media outlets are charging for ad time.
 
2012-04-23 08:27:10 PM
The FCC has proposed fixing that by requiring broadcasters to post online the details of political ad purchases, including the identity of the buyer and the price.



I don't have a problem with this.
 
2012-04-23 08:52:17 PM
They need to show us just how small of a group of old assholes is buying tons of air time to push their crappy anti-American agendas.

So of course all the media companies will cry about it, they are told to make some noise so the rape rape of the nation can continue without interruption.
 
2012-04-23 08:53:08 PM
Weaver95: The FCC has proposed fixing that by requiring broadcasters to post online the details of political ad purchases, including the identity of the buyer and the price.



I don't have a problem with this.


Ironic that news media is moving to suppress.
Naive to assume it's out of the norm.
 
2012-04-23 08:54:52 PM
fta: As we have recently detailed, political ad data is public by law but not easy to get because it is kept only in paper files at each station.

Reminded me of...

But the plans were on display . . ."
"On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them."
"That's the display department."
"With a torch."
"Ah, well the lights had probably gone."
"So had the stairs."
"But look, you found the notice, didn't you?"
"Yes," said Arthur, "yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying Beware of the Leopard."

Transparency is all well and good but it's the rules allowing overly high media ownership consolidation in America that need to be discussed and changed

New anti-trust laws need to be crafted.

They won't any time soon, of course, but they need to be.
 
2012-04-23 09:10:33 PM
Wow thats too many companies....I was told that only like 5 companies own everything we read, see and hear.
 
2012-04-23 10:11:36 PM
MegaCorp loves you.
 
2012-04-23 10:31:19 PM
We need to stop focusing on the amount of campaign money being raised and instead look at it as the amount of money being spent. Elections have become a multi-billion dollar industry. The media loves it because of the hundreds of millions spent on advertising. Elections are a money maker for them thus the non-stop coverage. They have a vested interest in making sure this source of income keeps flowing so they have no reason to support any regulations that could reduce the amount of money spent on elections.
 
2012-04-23 11:39:16 PM
Amazing how few comments there are on this topic.

We are are weeks away from Idiocracy being a reality.
 
2012-04-24 12:58:21 AM
Paper files at each station.. probably in a back closet, where few people who work there know they exist. Yeah, that's useless.

You don't want everyone to know your price? Don't be such whores.
 
2012-04-24 01:11:44 AM
Serve your masters and obey the manufactured narrative. Occupy is dead. The Tea Party is still a significant grassroots movement. The presidential election is a close race. The American people want austerity. Conform. Consume. Obey.
 
2012-04-24 03:20:05 AM
I spent 16 years doing video production in a cable ad-sales department. Any network rep who thinks their competitors don't already know their pricing structure is either brand new, or such a doe-eyed babe in the woods that they're not long for the business.
 
2012-04-24 04:39:17 AM
And, of course, the "major media outlets" won't be reporting on this.

Thank goodness we live in The Future.
 
Displayed 15 of 15 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report