Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(ABC News)   Republicans, who are apparently REALLY slow readers have apparently just finished the early chapters of Obama's autobiography which was published 16 years ago   (abcnews.go.com ) divider line
    More: Asinine, John McCain, obama  
•       •       •

2957 clicks; posted to Politics » on 20 Apr 2012 at 8:45 AM (4 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



208 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2012-04-20 12:26:41 PM  

Brubold: lennavan: Brubold: lennavan: Brubold: Step 1 - Attack Romney for old story his wife told about putting the family dog on top of the car for a road trip.

Step 2 - Watch as the plan blows up in your face because Obama told an old story about eating a dog as a kid in his autobiography.

Step 3 - Throw a foot stomping tantrum like a bunch of whiny little girls.

Dude, even PETA thinks you are stupid for equating torture of animals with eating of animals.

Wait a minute. Are you saying a left leaning organization discarded their beliefs in order to support a Democrat? I bet other left leaning groups like NOW would love to try th...oh wait.

No, I'm saying you are stupid. Even PETA thinks you are stupid. And PETA is pretty farking stupid, which makes you a special sort of stupid. Think of it like you're the stupidest person in stupid people school.

PETA would look the other way if during his next SOTU speech Obama bent down, picked up a dog, gutted it, and started chewing on its still beating heart.

It's still amusing to watch you throw a tantrum though so continue.


Would PETA look the other way if Obama swatted at a fly during an interview?

Dude, if you keep derpin at this level, I'll continue on with you all day long. This is amusing.
 
2012-04-20 12:29:26 PM  

Brubold: Maybe you're too young to remember the National Organization for Women looking the other way while Clinton's history of sexual harassment and infidelity was exposed. Or maybe you're just choosing not to remember their hypocrisy.


Maybe I'd like to see some hypocrisy before I remember it? What does Clinton getting a blowjob have to do with NOW?
 
2012-04-20 12:30:27 PM  

BillCo: [www.majhost.com image 327x212]

Mr. President, your lunch is ready.


Hey Bill...if that's the best you got, just quit. Obama's getting re-elected thanks to the likes of you genius.

/Insert your butthurt about Obama getting re-elected here:
 
2012-04-20 12:30:35 PM  

lennavan: Dude, if you keep derpin at this level, I'll continue on with you all day long. This is amusing.


It's a lot more fun than karnal saying he just FEELS like Obama's book was ghostwritten by a guy he met at a board meeting four months prior to his life story being published.
 
2012-04-20 12:34:34 PM  

lennavan: Brubold: lennavan: Brubold: lennavan: Brubold: Step 1 - Attack Romney for old story his wife told about putting the family dog on top of the car for a road trip.

Step 2 - Watch as the plan blows up in your face because Obama told an old story about eating a dog as a kid in his autobiography.

Step 3 - Throw a foot stomping tantrum like a bunch of whiny little girls.

Dude, even PETA thinks you are stupid for equating torture of animals with eating of animals.

Wait a minute. Are you saying a left leaning organization discarded their beliefs in order to support a Democrat? I bet other left leaning groups like NOW would love to try th...oh wait.

No, I'm saying you are stupid. Even PETA thinks you are stupid. And PETA is pretty farking stupid, which makes you a special sort of stupid. Think of it like you're the stupidest person in stupid people school.

PETA would look the other way if during his next SOTU speech Obama bent down, picked up a dog, gutted it, and started chewing on its still beating heart.

It's still amusing to watch you throw a tantrum though so continue.

Would PETA look the other way if Obama swatted at a fly during an interview?


Sounds to me like they sure did. Here's their official response to the fly swat.

It's basically, "Meh, he's human." They'd likely give a response to the dog heart eating that went something like, "He was hungry. It happens."
 
2012-04-20 12:35:48 PM  
McCain said something disparaging about a muslim nation? Say it ain't so.
 
2012-04-20 12:36:02 PM  

Brubold: It's basically, "Meh, he's human." They'd likely give a response to the dog heart eating that went something like, "He was hungry. It happens."


HE WAS SIX
 
2012-04-20 12:36:37 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: lennavan: Dude, if you keep derpin at this level, I'll continue on with you all day long. This is amusing.

It's a lot more fun than karnal saying he just FEELS like Obama's book was ghostwritten by a guy he met at a board meeting four months prior to his life story being published.


I dunno, that one's fun too. You just gotta remember, you'll never convince karnal otherwise, you'll never convince him that believing something based on zero proof whatsoever is fundamentally retarded. So when you reply, set your goal at "have fun" rather than "convince him otherwise."
 
2012-04-20 12:38:19 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: Brubold: It's basically, "Meh, he's human." They'd likely give a response to the dog heart eating that went something like, "He was hungry. It happens."

HE WAS SIX


I'm not talking about that incident. I'm speaking of a hypothetical situation and what PETA's reaction would be to it.
 
2012-04-20 12:38:46 PM  

lennavan: I dunno, that one's fun too. You just gotta remember, you'll never convince karnal otherwise, you'll never convince him that believing something based on zero proof whatsoever is fundamentally retarded. So when you reply, set your goal at "have fun" rather than "convince him otherwise."


Oh, I am. My favorite part was showing him that Obama met Ayers in 1995, not 1989 as he originally thought. Must have given him quite a headache trying to make that fit in to his narrative.
 
2012-04-20 12:39:32 PM  

Brubold: Would PETA look the other way if Obama swatted at a fly during an interview?


Sounds to me like they sure did. Here's their official response to the fly swat.

It's basically, "Meh, he's human."


Yeah, it was basically "meh, he farked up and acted before thinking. He's human"

OVER A FLY. A FARKING FLY. THEY SAID HE FARKED UP SWATTING A FLY.

But yeah, the beating heart of a dog during the state of the union speech thing is totally likely.
 
2012-04-20 12:39:40 PM  

Brubold: cameroncrazy1984: Brubold: It's basically, "Meh, he's human." They'd likely give a response to the dog heart eating that went something like, "He was hungry. It happens."

HE WAS SIX

I'm not talking about that incident. I'm speaking of a hypothetical situation and what PETA's reaction would be to it.


So, you're basically saying that PETAs reaction would be congruous even though it's an incongruous incident.

I bet you believe that if only your aunt had balls, she'd be your uncle.
 
2012-04-20 12:40:34 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: Brubold: Maybe you're too young to remember the National Organization for Women looking the other way while Clinton's history of sexual harassment and infidelity was exposed. Or maybe you're just choosing not to remember their hypocrisy.

Maybe I'd like to see some hypocrisy before I remember it? What does Clinton getting a blowjob have to do with NOW?


You don't see how it's hypocritical for an organization supposedly for equal rights for women to endorse a candidate who was a serial philanderer and sexual harasser?
 
2012-04-20 12:43:32 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: Brubold: cameroncrazy1984: Brubold: It's basically, "Meh, he's human." They'd likely give a response to the dog heart eating that went something like, "He was hungry. It happens."

HE WAS SIX

I'm not talking about that incident. I'm speaking of a hypothetical situation and what PETA's reaction would be to it.

So, you're basically saying that PETAs reaction would be congruous even though it's an incongruous incident.

I bet you believe that if only your aunt had balls, she'd be your uncle.


I bet if his aunt had balls, he'd want to sleep with her and when they did it, they'd do it doggystyle and then watch X files. I'm speaking of a hypothetical situation and what Brubold's reaction would be to it.
 
2012-04-20 12:45:15 PM  

Brubold: You don't see how it's hypocritical for an organization supposedly for equal rights for women to endorse a candidate who was a serial philanderer and sexual harasser?


Considering he never got arrested or convicted of sexual harrassment, and that having an affair with someone has nothing to do with equal rights for women...nope, I see no problem there.

Grasp at more straws though, it's amusing as fark.
 
2012-04-20 12:46:32 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: lennavan: I dunno, that one's fun too. You just gotta remember, you'll never convince karnal otherwise, you'll never convince him that believing something based on zero proof whatsoever is fundamentally retarded. So when you reply, set your goal at "have fun" rather than "convince him otherwise."

Oh, I am. My favorite part was showing him that Obama met Ayers in 1995, not 1989 as he originally thought. Must have given him quite a headache trying to make that fit in to his narrative.


Apart from the fact that there's absolutely no evidence for it, the theory doesn't even make sense.

Why would Obama not be capable of writing his own book? He was the editor of the Harvard Law Review and a Professor of Constitutional Law at a highly regarded law school. He's clearly capable of writing and expressing his thoughts. And aside from that, why would Ayers write Obama's memoirs?

Whenever I come across these right-wing obsessions that don't even make any sense on the surface, I just assume that it's basically masked racism, which is the only way it makes any sense. It's a dog whistle, like the teleprompter thing and birtherism.
 
2012-04-20 12:46:39 PM  

lennavan: Brubold: Would PETA look the other way if Obama swatted at a fly during an interview?


Sounds to me like they sure did. Here's their official response to the fly swat.

It's basically, "Meh, he's human."

Yeah, it was basically "meh, he farked up and acted before thinking. He's human"

OVER A FLY. A FARKING FLY. THEY SAID HE FARKED UP SWATTING A FLY.

But yeah, the beating heart of a dog during the state of the union speech thing is totally likely.


The PETA person gave the response after numerous media outlets contacted PETA asking for their response to the incident. It's not like they came out and attacked Obama on their own and it's not like it was even an attack. It was basically, "meh, it happens" as I stated before. I'm sure an excuse would be found for him eating a dog in his next speech just like one was found for him eating a dog when he was a kid. Why? Because he's a Democrat and everyone knows that Democrats can't be racists, crooks, liars, or generally do anything else wrong as far as these organizations are concerned.
 
2012-04-20 12:48:11 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: Brubold: You don't see how it's hypocritical for an organization supposedly for equal rights for women to endorse a candidate who was a serial philanderer and sexual harasser?

Considering he never got arrested or convicted of sexual harrassment, and that having an affair with someone has nothing to do with equal rights for women...nope, I see no problem there.

Grasp at more straws though, it's amusing as fark.


Thanks for proving my point about people looking the other way when Democrats screw up.
 
2012-04-20 12:49:00 PM  

Doc Daneeka: Why would Obama not be capable of writing his own book? He was the editor of the Harvard Law Review and a Professor of Constitutional Law at a highly regarded law school. He's clearly capable of writing and expressing his thoughts. And aside from that, why would Ayers write Obama's memoirs?


The only answer is that they believe he was under the influence of Ayers mysterious power. That and black people aren't good enough to write their own books.
 
2012-04-20 12:49:36 PM  

Brubold: cameroncrazy1984: Brubold: You don't see how it's hypocritical for an organization supposedly for equal rights for women to endorse a candidate who was a serial philanderer and sexual harasser?

Considering he never got arrested or convicted of sexual harrassment, and that having an affair with someone has nothing to do with equal rights for women...nope, I see no problem there.

Grasp at more straws though, it's amusing as fark.

Thanks for proving my point about people looking the other way when Democrats screw up.


What point? You mentioned equal rights. Having an affair has nothing to do with Clinton's policies on equal rights for women, does it?

If it does, how?
 
2012-04-20 12:50:23 PM  

Brubold: You don't see how it's hypocritical for an organization supposedly for equal rights for women to endorse a candidate who was a serial philanderer and sexual harasser?


It's not hypocritical if, as a public policy advocacy group, they value and prioritize public policy regarding women's rights and reproductive rights over the personal failings of an individual politician. And especially if the alternative from the other party is much worse regarding those areas of public policy.
 
2012-04-20 12:51:02 PM  

Doc Daneeka: Whenever I come across these right-wing obsessions that don't even make any sense on the surface, I just assume that it's basically masked racism, which is the only way it makes any sense. It's a dog whistle, like the teleprompter thing and birtherism.


Also, I think the Bills are probably going to draft Kirkpatrick at #10. They interviewed him on GR this morning and he seems like a really smart kid. And the Bills need a good corner who's not 87 years old like Florence.
 
2012-04-20 12:51:44 PM  

Doc Daneeka: Brubold: You don't see how it's hypocritical for an organization supposedly for equal rights for women to endorse a candidate who was a serial philanderer and sexual harasser?

It's not hypocritical if, as a public policy advocacy group, they value and prioritize public policy regarding women's rights and reproductive rights over the personal failings of an individual politician. And especially if the alternative from the other party is much worse regarding those areas of public policy.


I've tried that. He doesn't understand logic. He just wants to make Democrats look bad.
 
2012-04-20 12:53:55 PM  

Brubold: cameroncrazy1984: Brubold: It's basically, "Meh, he's human." They'd likely give a response to the dog heart eating that went something like, "He was hungry. It happens."

HE WAS SIX

I'm not talking about that incident. I'm speaking of a hypothetical situation and what PETA's reaction would be to it. masturbating.

 
2012-04-20 12:56:04 PM  

Brubold: lennavan: Brubold: Would PETA look the other way if Obama swatted at a fly during an interview?


Sounds to me like they sure did. Here's their official response to the fly swat.

It's basically, "Meh, he's human."

Yeah, it was basically "meh, he farked up and acted before thinking. He's human"

OVER A FLY. A FARKING FLY. THEY SAID HE FARKED UP SWATTING A FLY.

But yeah, the beating heart of a dog during the state of the union speech thing is totally likely.

The PETA person gave the response after numerous media outlets contacted PETA asking for their response to the incident. It's not like they came out and attacked Obama on their own and it's not like it was even an attack. It was basically, "meh, it happens" as I stated before. I'm sure an excuse would be found for him eating a dog in his next speech just like one was found for him eating a dog when he was a kid. Why? Because he's a Democrat and everyone knows that Democrats can't be racists, crooks, liars, or generally do anything else wrong as far as these organizations are concerned.


So the fact that they didn't call a press conference to issue a scathing condemnation to the act of swatting a fly mean they weren't really serious when they said he farked up?

Just look at how stupid you are.
 
2012-04-20 12:57:55 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: Doc Daneeka: Whenever I come across these right-wing obsessions that don't even make any sense on the surface, I just assume that it's basically masked racism, which is the only way it makes any sense. It's a dog whistle, like the teleprompter thing and birtherism.

Also, I think the Bills are probably going to draft Kirkpatrick at #10. They interviewed him on GR this morning and he seems like a really smart kid. And the Bills need a good corner who's not 87 years old like Florence.


I confess...I'm kind of a casual fan when it comes to the Bills and football. I hope they draft someone good and someday become a contending team again. But I don't follow college football and couldn't really have an informed conversation about what prospects are good or not.

Could probably have a much longer conversation about what the Sabres should do in their upcoming draft, than the Bills.
 
2012-04-20 12:59:51 PM  

Brubold: The PETA person gave the response after numerous media outlets contacted PETA asking for their response to the incident. It's not like they came out and attacked Obama on their own and it's not like it was even an attack. It was basically, "meh, it happens" as I stated before. I'm sure an excuse would be found for him eating a dog in his next speech just like one was found for him eating a dog when he was a kid. Why? Because he's a Democrat and everyone knows that Democrats can't be racists, crooks, liars, or generally do anything else wrong as far as these organizations are concerned.


Were you crying when you wrote that last sentence? Do you feel like the world is against you? Do you want to cut yourself now? Poor baby.
 
2012-04-20 01:02:38 PM  

Brubold: cameroncrazy1984: Brubold: You don't see how it's hypocritical for an organization supposedly for equal rights for women to endorse a candidate who was a serial philanderer and sexual harasser?

Considering he never got arrested or convicted of sexual harrassment, and that having an affair with someone has nothing to do with equal rights for women...nope, I see no problem there.

Grasp at more straws though, it's amusing as fark.

Thanks for proving my point about people looking the other way when Democrats screw up.


Yeah, I also use the widespread publication of Bill Clinton's sex scandal and impeachment trial as my example of people looking the other way when Democrats screw up.
 
2012-04-20 01:08:26 PM  

Doc Daneeka: Could probably have a much longer conversation about what the Sabres should do in their upcoming draft, than the Bills.


My guess? Defensive depth. And centermen. Lots of centermen.
 
2012-04-20 01:46:44 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: Doc Daneeka: Could probably have a much longer conversation about what the Sabres should do in their upcoming draft, than the Bills.

My guess? Defensive depth. And centermen. Lots of centermen.


Defensive depth isn't bad. McNabb, Brennan, and Pysyk all in the pipeline and all project as NHLers. Though using their second first rounder or one of their second rounders on a defenseman would be fine with me.

Top pick though should definitely be a centerman. Center depth is weak both at the NHL level and on the farm. Only thing in the pipeline is a regressing Luke Adam and a bunch of question marks. Hopefully Faksa can fall to them at #12; either that, or maybe they can trade up and try to get Grigorenko.

Alternatively, some statements by Regier lead me to believe that they may try to use their wealth of high draft picks (4 in the first two rounds) to acquire a center via trade. Especially since the free agent crop is pretty weak this year.
 
2012-04-20 02:05:57 PM  
Wow... I really got to update my list of right wing apologist trolls in this thread.
 
2012-04-20 02:22:50 PM  

Doc Daneeka: Hopefully Faksa can fall to them at #12; either that, or maybe they can trade up and try to get Grigorenko.

Alternatively, some statements by Regier lead me to believe that they may try to use their wealth of high draft picks (4 in the first two rounds) to acquire a center via trade. Especially since the free agent crop is pretty weak this year


I think I'd prefer this method, because they are really weak at the NHL levels; a surprising Ennis notwithstanding.
 
2012-04-20 02:41:40 PM  
Subby, you said "apparently" twice
 
2012-04-20 03:21:17 PM  

lennavan: Brubold: The PETA person gave the response after numerous media outlets contacted PETA asking for their response to the incident. It's not like they came out and attacked Obama on their own and it's not like it was even an attack. It was basically, "meh, it happens" as I stated before. I'm sure an excuse would be found for him eating a dog in his next speech just like one was found for him eating a dog when he was a kid. Why? Because he's a Democrat and everyone knows that Democrats can't be racists, crooks, liars, or generally do anything else wrong as far as these organizations are concerned.

Were you crying when you wrote that last sentence? Do you feel like the world is against you? Do you want to cut yourself now? Poor baby.


Dear God he's whiny isn't he.

It's like he nailed himself up to a cross and he's upset that people aren't looking at him.

"HEY GUYS, LOOK AT ME. I'M NAILED UP ON A CROSS. WHY WON'T YOU GUYS LOOK AT ME?!?!?!?!"
 
2012-04-20 03:37:02 PM  
What kind of insane egomaniac writes an autobiography at 34 years old?

/it's rhetorical but I expect answers, lol
 
2012-04-20 04:01:04 PM  

YELLOL: What kind of insane egomaniac writes an autobiography at 34 years old?

/it's rhetorical but I expect answers, lol


The kind who can write an autobiography that will make millions of dollars. I'd write my autobiography right now if I had the skills and life story to make a tenth of what Obama made on his.

It doesn't take a genius level rocket surgeon to figure that out.
 
2012-04-20 04:03:33 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: karnal: cameroncrazy1984


karnal: lennavan

karnal: Never claimed to have proof

Hey, don't let that stop you from totally believing and defending it though.


So, the only things you believe in are things you can prove?

Who wrote a book is not a matter of faith.


You believing Obama wrote it all by himself is.....

Not at all.

It says so right there in the title

"Dreams from my Father" by Barack Obama

I have proof he wrote it. It's published.

What reason do you have to doubt that proof?


Ironic, that Hillary Clinton did indeed use a Ghost Writer for "It Takes a Village" but people believe she wrote it (or at least don't challenge it as much) because she's smart and they accept that she is smart because she graduated from a good university I guess.

I wonder why Obama doesn't get the same benefit of the doubt?
 
2012-04-20 04:06:48 PM  

YELLOL: What kind of insane egomaniac writes an autobiography at 34 years old?

/it's rhetorical but I expect answers, lol


I wonder how many black combination Harvard Law Professors / US Senatora think they have a story worth telling?

I guess all of them in turns out.
 
2012-04-20 04:24:27 PM  

Knight of the Woeful Countenance: Wow... I really got to update my list of right wing apologist trolls in this thread.


Mrtraveler01: lennavan: Brubold: The PETA person gave the response after numerous media outlets contacted PETA asking for their response to the incident. It's not like they came out and attacked Obama on their own and it's not like it was even an attack. It was basically, "meh, it happens" as I stated before. I'm sure an excuse would be found for him eating a dog in his next speech just like one was found for him eating a dog when he was a kid. Why? Because he's a Democrat and everyone knows that Democrats can't be racists, crooks, liars, or generally do anything else wrong as far as these organizations are concerned.

Were you crying when you wrote that last sentence? Do you feel like the world is against you? Do you want to cut yourself now? Poor baby.

Dear God he's whiny isn't he.

It's like he nailed himself up to a cross and he's upset that people aren't looking at him.

"HEY GUYS, LOOK AT ME. I'M NAILED UP ON A CROSS. WHY WON'T YOU GUYS LOOK AT ME?!?!?!?!"


I love how you've somehow turned this around in your mind to me being whiny. I'm not the one biatching about the Republicans managing to own Obama over this whole dog story nonsense. You got served, libs. You started the fight and took an uppercut to the chin. Deal with it and stop crying about it.
 
2012-04-20 04:40:55 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: Doc Daneeka: Hopefully Faksa can fall to them at #12; either that, or maybe they can trade up and try to get Grigorenko.

Alternatively, some statements by Regier lead me to believe that they may try to use their wealth of high draft picks (4 in the first two rounds) to acquire a center via trade. Especially since the free agent crop is pretty weak this year

I think I'd prefer this method, because they are really weak at the NHL levels; a surprising Ennis notwithstanding.


Their NHL centers right now are Roy, Ennis, Hodgson, McCormick.

McCormick is fine in a 4th line role - can be shifted out for Adam if he ever gets his shiat together. Assuming Roy is gone over the summer, that leaves them needing to add one center. Ennis and Hodgson are a pretty good 1-2 punch (going to be really good in a few years), but right now, they are a bit on the young side. So what they really need is a experienced, veteran center, doesn't have to be a top-liner, but enough skill to be slotted into the second or third line.
 
2012-04-20 04:47:16 PM  

LasersHurt: Jake Havechek: To: LyinLibs
This man, Obama, and his blood lust for dog meat is sickening. Can you imagine the number of labs, golden retrievers and collies that he has had shipped into Sam Kass's kitchen for slaughter.

Obama feasts on dog meat souffle, BBQ dog, dog stew, deep fried dog, all while the rest of us try to carefully eat the way Michelle tells us.

If he is re-elected, we must demand that he stops slaughtering dogs.
102 posted on Thursday, April 19, 2012 12:36:13 AM by Jay Santos CP ("Idiocracy"... It's no longer just a movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Honestly, that one's pretty funny because they KNOW they're being over the top.


Trolls usually are.

/an idiocracy reference?
//yeah, 'jay santos' is trolling freeperville for s&g
 
2012-04-20 05:10:50 PM  

Brubold: Knight of the Woeful Countenance: Wow... I really got to update my list of right wing apologist trolls in this thread.

Mrtraveler01: lennavan: Brubold: The PETA person gave the response after numerous media outlets contacted PETA asking for their response to the incident. It's not like they came out and attacked Obama on their own and it's not like it was even an attack. It was basically, "meh, it happens" as I stated before. I'm sure an excuse would be found for him eating a dog in his next speech just like one was found for him eating a dog when he was a kid. Why? Because he's a Democrat and everyone knows that Democrats can't be racists, crooks, liars, or generally do anything else wrong as far as these organizations are concerned.

Were you crying when you wrote that last sentence? Do you feel like the world is against you? Do you want to cut yourself now? Poor baby.

Dear God he's whiny isn't he.

It's like he nailed himself up to a cross and he's upset that people aren't looking at him.

"HEY GUYS, LOOK AT ME. I'M NAILED UP ON A CROSS. WHY WON'T YOU GUYS LOOK AT ME?!?!?!?!"

I love how you've somehow turned this around in your mind to me being whiny. I'm not the one biatching about the Republicans managing to own Obama over this whole dog story nonsense. You got served, libs. You started the fight and took an uppercut to the chin. Deal with it and stop crying about it.


John McCain made a lame joke about something Obama ate when he was six, and you think McCain is winning?

2008 Electoral votes:

Obama: 365

McCain: 173

But let's just call it a draw. . .

richleeonline.files.wordpress.com

/Seriously, I think this dog thing is gonna be a winning issue in 2012.
//NITBAFS
 
2012-04-20 05:23:31 PM  

mrshowrules: YELLOL: What kind of insane egomaniac writes an autobiography at 34 years old?

/it's rhetorical but I expect answers, lol

I wonder how many black combination Harvard Law Professors / US Senatora think they have a story worth telling?

I guess all of them in turns out.


Obama has never been a law professor, let alone a Harvard law professor. He was the first black editor of the Harvard Law Review and also the first editor of the Harvard Law Review to never have published an article in said review.

Additionally, at age 34 he had not yet started his political career.

I know facts are pesky things to his followers but they are what they are.
 
2012-04-20 05:30:56 PM  

Brubold:

I love how you've somehow turned this around in your mind to me being whiny. I'm not the one biatching about the Republicans managing to own Obama over this whole dog story nonsense. You got served, libs. You started the fight and took an uppercut to the chin. Deal with it and stop crying about it.


Yeah... cause that's what happened.

/Thanks for the insight in my psyche Dr. Freud.
 
2012-04-20 05:43:26 PM  

YELLOL: Obama has never been a law professor, let alone a Harvard law professor.


Well, if you ignore the twelve years he taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago law school, that's exactly right.
 
2012-04-20 05:45:16 PM  

YELLOL: Obama has never been a law professor, let alone a Harvard law professor.


Liar.

He was a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School.
 
2012-04-20 07:13:37 PM  

Magorn: GAT_00: So this is actually true? It is in his autobiography. And the media actually ran with this like it was news, yet isn't covering the GOP blocking the Violence Against Women Act or their betrayal of the deficit deal, which is going to mean a government shutdown in October.

Yeah. Liberal media my ass.

In my opinion the media isn't Liberal or conservative anymore just lazy as a motherfarker.


I think you are reading it wrong. The media wants an exciting story. Obama walking all over the opposition sounds dull so they will do all they can to whip it up into a race. Its disgusting really, but it will probably work.
 
2012-04-20 07:16:58 PM  

Doc Daneeka: YELLOL: Obama has never been a law professor, let alone a Harvard law professor.

Liar.

He was a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School.


You are the liar. He was an unpaid guest speaker. He has never, I mean NEVER EVER, been a professor. There is absolutely no record of him working for the University of Chicago or any other university.

How's it feel with those pants on fire?
 
2012-04-20 07:31:31 PM  

YELLOL: Doc Daneeka: YELLOL: Obama has never been a law professor, let alone a Harvard law professor.

Liar.

He was a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School.

You are the liar. He was an unpaid guest speaker. He has never, I mean NEVER EVER, been a professor. There is absolutely no record of him working for the University of Chicago or any other university.

How's it feel with those pants on fire?


Statement directly from the University of Chicago:

Statement Regarding Barack Obama
The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as "Senior Lecturer."

From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers has high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.


Boom. Debate over. You lose.

Unless you'd care to make the exceedingly silly argument the Univ of Chicago doesn't understand who worked in its employ as a law professor.
 
2012-04-20 08:03:35 PM  
YELLOL: *crickets*

I thought so.

Liar.
 
Displayed 50 of 208 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter








In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report