Obama will win handily. He has all the black vote, most of the Latino vote, women are dumb, poor people are dumb, liberals are dumb, so he gets all of those too. Occupy, college kids, none have life experience so will vote for free stuff.

Really is the beginning of the end. 10 years we will have Greece debt to GDP ratio, and even more dumb poor people, all breeding ultra fast and making new lil Democrats. They will need more and more free stuff, so Democrats will borrow more and more to buy their votes and enrich themselves.

I would just like to offer conrats to Rmoney on beating Not-Romney. It was a good fight, and I will be glad to see him lose this fall.

Rent Party: It's a mistake. In states where either Santorum or Gingrich won at least one delegate Obama doesn't have a prayer of winning (i.e. those where they campaigned and were on the ballot), together they are well ahead of Romney.

They don't need to quit, they need to double down and get into more races before the convention.

BigBooper: "I am sick and tired of it. Time for a third party. Your country is calling you Governor Palin."

Ohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohplease...

/we're stuck with a sweatervest, a norman bates clone, and blond peter griffin in charge up here for the next few years
//i need to get my entertainment somewhere

BigBooper: I don't really spend time at Free Republic, but for those that do: When did Sarah Palin become their queen?


August 29, 2008 Link (new window)

AmazinTim: The daughter in the green shirt looks totally DTF

You mean the one that was born in 1998? Sicko.

Lenny_da_Hog: Weaver95: there's that 'american exceptionalism' thing again. WTF man....what does that even mean?

No matter how farked up we are, we're the best because we don't admit it! YAY!


USA! USA!! USA!!!

moralpanic: Hollywood Cole: Is anyone else surprised, and or scared, at how far into the race this human-rights-denying, life invading, jack off made it?

Yes, and Gingrich too. This is the new GOP in the SuperPAC era.

I will say I AM surprised Gingrich is still hanging on, but he's been largely irrelevant for awhile now. The only way he gets fun is if he ends up with Santorum's delegates and insists on continuing this until the convention.

/ohpleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleas e p leasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease

hp6sa: blackminded: [msnbcmedia4.msn.com image 474x328]

Oh yeah. I'd oppress her sexually, if you know what I mean.

/and I think you do

She's 14.

Thunderpipes: Obama will win handily. He has all the black vote, most of the Latino vote, women are dumb, poor people are dumb, liberals are dumb, so he gets all of those too. Occupy, college kids, none have life experience so will vote for free stuff.


People who vote for their interest are dumb? Then what about the ones that vote against their interest (90% of those that vote Republicans).

Hollywood Cole: Is anyone else surprised, and or scared, at how far into the race this human-rights-denying, life invading, jack off made it?

Santorum's recent popularity stems more from who he isn't rather than who he is. The more people found out about him, the less they liked him. Nobody really wants an insane religious extremist and repressed sexual neuter in the White House, he would have been completely decimated in the general election.

WhyteRaven74: You're expecting a Freeper to read Plato?

Mea culpa. I have no excuse. The plus side is that guy equates his version of America with Atlantis, which made me laugh.

MythDragon: Is it too late to get David Palmer on the ballet?
[images.wikia.com image 357x491]
Not only is he 100% black, he'd actualy make a good president.

Damn straight!

Gotfire: Pop.... Drip.... SPLAT

...dribble...

Aar1012: make me some tea: Man, you think the Freeper commenters are having a meltdown, the TPN ones are even more off the cliff.

"ROMNEY HAS SERIOUS ELIGIBILITY ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED!!!!.

Wat?

Was a part of RomneyBot not manufactured in the US?

Didn't you know that Mormons are constitutionally barred from office?

Jim Rob posts to buck up the troops (new window)

sethstorm: We're not out of the woods - we still have the televangelists and Southern 'thumpers if Newt gets any traction. If any of you remember what Falwell, Bakker, and the like did in the 80's, that is what you will get with Newt. If you don't remember, or are too young to remember, read up on that part of history.

/Yes, I am a Romney supporter

I voted for Obama in 2008, Kerry in 2004, and Gore in 2000, but would have voted for McCain in 2008 if it hadn't been for a.) picking someone even more idiotic than Biden for VP, and b.) kicking off the campaign by giving the commencement at Liberty U.

b.) is actually what did it for me.

I mean, look, I know there'll be at least one Christian who gets offended at that, and all I can say is this: I took my wife and kids to a Baptist church on Easter Sunday, and that church makes yours look like a bunch of backsliders. Falwell was a used-car salesman, not a preacher.

Aar1012: make me some tea: Man, you think the Freeper commenters are having a meltdown, the TPN ones are even more off the cliff.

"ROMNEY HAS SERIOUS ELIGIBILITY ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED!!!!.

Wat?

Was a part of RomneyBot not manufactured in the US?

His dad was born in Mexico. It's not really an issue.

My favorite comment so far from the Freepers:

"We have to keep praying, God wouldn't leave us with these
two awful choices. They aren't choices at all!

something could happen, yes?"

Guess god hates America, or there is none, I guess.

BunkoSquad

So how many candidates that God told to run for President have fallen on their faces now?

God should really stick to football.........

beefoe: Rent Party: It's a mistake. In states where either Santorum or Gingrich won at least one delegate Obama doesn't have a prayer of winning (i.e. those where they campaigned and were on the ballot), together they are well ahead of Romney.

They don't need to quit, they need to double down and get into more races before the convention.

Including Iowa, Minnesota, and North Dakota?

Obama can win those states.

netweavr: Vlad_the_Inaner: netweavr: Weaver95: 'shining city on the hill'.

what weird catch phrases evangelicals have...

If the city is on a hill, then it is highly-susceptible to siege tactics. Starve the residents.

Which validates the French building their base in a valley at Điện Biên Phủ?

Because those are the only two options? Your city should be built on a waterway or against a pass of some sort. You need to prevent being encircled and cut-off from resupply. Else you're just building a monument to human stupidity.

There is a tactical advantage to the higher ground. That's why military advice is rife with stuff like Sun Tzu's "Camp in high places, facing the sun. Do not climb heights in order to fight. So much for mountain warfare. "

You are arguing a strategic point, assuming that the army in the field has secure supply lines, and that the fortress has no allies. If the fortress is prepared, it should have prepared for a siege that would last long enough for allies to arrive. The enemy encampment about may be limited to what it carried with it. The people under siege may have even razed their own fields to prevent is use by the enemy. the encircling army's facilities are done quickly, and after time, things like the lack of sanitation may wear. A fortress has no intention of moving, but an invading army usually has a larger goal. If that goal is larger than just the city under siege, then it has pinned the portion of its resources investing the fortress. These are cannot be used towards the larger goal. If re-enforcements arrive for the fortress, the besiegers will be facing opposition on two fronts.

Napoleon is often quoted as saying "Ask me for anything but time". That is because time is precious in warfare, and time is exactly what sieges cost the opposition.

TLDR: The tactical advantage to higher ground is widely known. Your assumption that strategic concerns were not considered in planning a fortification is naive. But go ahead, Starve Stalingrad out, that always works.

RoxtarRyan: My favorite comment so far from the Freepers:

"We have to keep praying, God wouldn't leave us with these
two awful choices. They aren't choices at all!

something could happen, yes?"

Guess god hates America, or there is none, I guess.

suggesting a prayer/fast would shut them up

Freeper-tastic:

"Notice: FR is and will remain a pro-life, small government conservative site.
April 10, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on Tuesday, April 10, 2012 3:29:15 PM by Jim Robinson

To hell with the GOP-e. Barring a miracle, they got their big government, unconstitutional mandate loving, socialist abortionist Obama-lite RINO on the ballot, they can now get him elected.

We are the resistance!!

Shove him down our throats today, we shove him up your donkeys in November!!

I can see November from my house!!"

Aar1012: LadyBelgara: Aar1012: make me some tea: Man, you think the Freeper commenters are having a meltdown, the TPN ones are even more off the cliff.

"ROMNEY HAS SERIOUS ELIGIBILITY ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED!!!!.

Wat?

Was a part of RomneyBot not manufactured in the US?

Didn't you know that Mormons are constitutionally barred from office?

Ah yes. How could I forget the 32nd Amendment to the Constitution?

Clearly you just don't love Amurika and G_d enough. You should be ashamed.

palelizard: His dad was born in Mexico. It's not really an issue.

Wanna bet? Just wait for the derpers to really get cranking once Rmoney officially wins the nomination. If a third party rises in reaction, start making popcorn and stockpiling booze.

moralpanic: Thunderpipes: Obama will win handily. He has all the black vote, most of the Latino vote, women are dumb, poor people are dumb, liberals are dumb, so he gets all of those too. Occupy, college kids, none have life experience so will vote for free stuff.


People who vote for their interest are dumb? Then what about the ones that vote against their interest (90% of those that vote Republicans).

Because short term free stuff is not really good for you, not when long term it means economic collapse. Smart people know that. Eventually, you stupid libs WILL run out of other people's money.

make me some tea: Oh man, now they're going on about Mitt Romney not being a citizen.

Someone posted this link: Link (new window)

LMAO

Awesome. I love how they took themselves so far down the rabbit hole with Obama that this is what they're stuck with now.

And now, the Freepers are turning on each other:

To: Jim Robinson

That's some of the best news that Obama has had in a long time. He is now well on the way to getting reelected. I never thought that Free Republic would help to destroy the country. I was wrong.

10 posted on Tuesday, April 10, 2012 3:32:50 PM by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


/rubs hands with anticipation
//eeeeexcelent.

palelizard: The plus side is that guy equates his version of America with Atlantis, which made me laugh.

If nothing else Freepers do come up with some hilarious similes and metaphors.

Thunderpipes: Obama will win handily. He has all the black vote, most of the Latino vote, women are dumb, poor people are dumb, liberals are dumb, so he gets all of those too. Occupy, college kids, none have life experience so will vote for free stuff.

Really is the beginning of the end. 10 years we will have Greece debt to GDP ratio, and even more dumb poor people, all breeding ultra fast and making new lil Democrats. They will need more and more free stuff, so Democrats will borrow more and more to buy their votes and enrich themselves.

Meh. 3/10. Needs more urgency.

Jake Havechek: Jim Rob posts to buck up the troops (new window)



and

That's some of the best news that Obama has had in a long time. He is now well on the way to getting reelected. I never thought that Free Republic would help to destroy the country. I was wrong.

Thunderpipes: moralpanic: Thunderpipes: Obama will win handily. He has all the black vote, most of the Latino vote, women are dumb, poor people are dumb, liberals are dumb, so he gets all of those too. Occupy, college kids, none have life experience so will vote for free stuff.


People who vote for their interest are dumb? Then what about the ones that vote against their interest (90% of those that vote Republicans).

Because short term free stuff is not really good for you, not when long term it means economic collapse. Smart people know that. Eventually, you stupid libs WILL run out of other people's money.

Why should we even care? Your farking hero Bush charged his 2 wars to our grandkids.

RoxtarRyan: And now, the Freepers are turning on each other:

Awwwwww yeah. Just yesterday I was wondering when their next purge would be, wasn't expecting it to be so soon.

Thunderpipes: Obama will win handily. He has all the black vote, most of the Latino vote, women are dumb, poor people are dumb, liberals are dumb, so he gets all of those too. Occupy, college kids, none have life experience so will vote for free stuff.

Yeah, those uppity women and minorities should keep their damn mouths shut and let the strong sexy smart white Republican men decide what's best for them. Rights? Choice? Fark that noise, God told them that it's his way or the highway.

make me some tea: Oh man, now they're going on about Mitt Romney not being a citizen.

Someone posted this link: Link (new window)

LMAO

Needless to say the author responds to a spam comment with not only his email address but his PHONE NUMBER

Aar1012: peter21: So what did Romney offer Rick to drop out now? Pick up the tab on his campaign debt? Bleaching products?

I too think Ricky got out before a loss in PA slapped him silly. Can't make a dime as a FOX News contributer with that kind of embarrassment.

What about Ollie North? Granted, losing by 3% isn't bad, but selling weapons to Iran would blacklist you, one would think.

This is a very good point. I've never understood how Oliver North has an actual public career. And Hannity always refers to him as 'my friend.' I guess they figure most of the 'folks' tuning in have forgotten his indiscretions. Kinda like how O'Reilly will never mention Andrea Mackris' name again.

Aar1012: make me some tea: Oh man, now they're going on about Mitt Romney not being a citizen.

Someone posted this link: Link (new window)

LMAO

I'm scared to click that link. Under what delusional mindset is Mitt not a US Citizen?

In the universe that his entire family converted to Mexican citizenship. It has a farking FAMILY TREE.



I'm busy trying not to laugh myself sick in the middle of the computer lab. You can't make this shiat up.