If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Snopes)   Snopes traces a true story found on Facebook in April 2012 all the way to China, 620BC   (snopes.com) divider line 48
    More: Amusing, East Los Angeles  
•       •       •

23515 clicks; posted to Main » on 10 Apr 2012 at 9:43 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



48 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-04-10 09:47:37 AM
Umm, last I heard, Aesop was Greek.
 
2012-04-10 09:49:07 AM
CrossEyed: Umm, last I heard, Aesop was Greek.

Not according to the Chinese.
 
2012-04-10 09:49:50 AM
Was Snopes being a George Soros mouthpiece confirmed or denied?
 
2012-04-10 09:50:02 AM
Last i heard, "true" meant nonfictional.
 
2012-04-10 09:50:23 AM
Also of note, in 620ad in China a man died on the Muagambo Highway leaving several million yen that was unable to be removed from his account without aid of an unrelated party.
 
2012-04-10 09:51:01 AM
I think that Aesop also originated the story of ingesting pop rocks and coke.
 
2012-04-10 09:53:10 AM
I see what you did there, Subby.
+1
 
2012-04-10 09:53:24 AM
LoneDoggie: Also of note, in 620ad in China a man died on the Muagambo Highway leaving several million yen that was unable to be removed from his account without aid of an unrelated party.

wasn't that the guy who died because he was approaching a carriage that didn't have their lanterns lit up and he flashed his lamp at them only to have them run him off the Muagambo Highway?
 
2012-04-10 09:53:41 AM
imgs.xkcd.com
 
2012-04-10 09:57:05 AM
No - Aesop is the guy who is trying to set the world's record for receiving birthday cards before the terminal illness takes him out
 
2012-04-10 10:03:12 AM
dittybopper: CrossEyed: Umm, last I heard, Aesop was Greek.

Not according to the Chinese.


images.wikia.com

Actually, he was Russian.

/Hot, like a nuclear wessel
 
2012-04-10 10:03:21 AM
CrossEyed: Umm, last I heard, Aesop was Greek.

Aesop is only fully appreciated in the original Klingon.
 
2012-04-10 10:05:09 AM
I understand that during the Warring States period you had to be careful taking your children to the local Buddhist Gardens because ruffians would sometimes hide plague bodies in the giant wooden vat of twine balls where the children would play.
 
2012-04-10 10:05:51 AM
Subby has a subpoena to go dig up China tonight.
 
2012-04-10 10:07:48 AM
Of course, it was well-known that if enough Mongol soldiers sent enough ears of their vanquished enemies to the Great Khan via mounted courier, he would give a million yuan to the local Horseless Orphans Sanctuary.
 
2012-04-10 10:07:58 AM
Fools! All of you!
Aesop was the college kid who heard that if your roommate dies you get a 4.0, so he killed his roommate and made it look like a suicide.
 
2012-04-10 10:10:25 AM
Aesop wrote his fables whilst in prison for killing a woman in 605 BC.


/not known whether he buried her in his garden.
 
2012-04-10 10:13:52 AM
The phone rings at KGB headquarters, sometime in the 1960's

"Hello?"

"Hello, is this KGB?"

"Da."

"I'm calling to report my neighbor, Hershel Yankovitz is an enemy of the State. He is hiding undeclared diamonds in his firewood."

"This will be noted."

The next day, the KGB sends their hoodlums to Hershel's tiny house. Out back, in the shed, they violently break every piece of firewood in their search for contraband. They find nothing.

Ten minutes later, the phone rings at Hershel's house.


..and rings, ... and rings... and rings
 
2012-04-10 10:24:29 AM
GungFu: Aesop wrote his fables whilst in prison for killing a woman in 605 BC.


/not known whether he buried her in his garden.


I heard it was because he raped and a murdered a girl in 1990.
 
2012-04-10 10:32:25 AM
stevetherobot: GungFu: Aesop wrote his fables whilst in prison for killing a woman in 605 BC.


/not known whether he buried her in his garden.

I heard it was because he raped and a murdered a girl in 1990.


Aesop certainly never denied it.
 
2012-04-10 10:36:37 AM
Nothing new under the sun.
 
2012-04-10 10:39:17 AM
aesop, the famous chinese fable-spinner...
 
2012-04-10 10:42:21 AM
wambu: Nothing new under the sun.

i44.tinypic.com

Microchip technology - that's quite a new thing, isn't it?

/Fancy a game of Travel Scrabble?
 
2012-04-10 10:46:33 AM
dittybopper: CrossEyed: Umm, last I heard, Aesop was Greek.

Not according to the Chinese.


The Greeks beg to differ.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesop
 
2012-04-10 10:47:12 AM
First time I heard that story, I laughed so hard, I fell of my dinosaur and Snopes is only just now checking to see how much truth there is to it?
 
2012-04-10 10:47:30 AM
CrossEyed: Umm, last I heard, Aesop was Greek.

I thought it was a 1960s cartoon.

www.toonarific.com
 
2012-04-10 10:50:41 AM
Ok, am I missing some in-joke or meme about a Chinese Aesop?
 
2012-04-10 10:57:10 AM
duffblue: Was Snopes being a George Soros mouthpiece confirmed or denied?

Dunno about that, but Snopes isn't the final word on anything. For example, look at their coverage of the "1895 exam".

http://www.snopes.com/language/document/1895exam.asp

They couldn't stick to the real question which is "did these questions come from a 1895 Jr. High exam". They instead choose to create their own question which was ~"does this exam show a decline in education", a question nobody would turn to Snopes for because it is an obvious opinion. They answered their own question "False" without even addressing if the exam was actually given to students in 1895. I don't disagree with many of the points they make, but answer the farking question or admit you don't know!

/this one entry really stuck out to me as an example of non-excellence
//still go to Snopes first
///at least they show some of their work
 
2012-04-10 11:07:57 AM
Big_Fat_Liar: duffblue: Was Snopes being a George Soros mouthpiece confirmed or denied?

Dunno about that, but Snopes isn't the final word on anything. For example, look at their coverage of the "1895 exam".

http://www.snopes.com/language/document/1895exam.asp

They couldn't stick to the real question which is "did these questions come from a 1895 Jr. High exam". They instead choose to create their own question which was ~"does this exam show a decline in education", a question nobody would turn to Snopes for because it is an obvious opinion. They answered their own question "False" without even addressing if the exam was actually given to students in 1895. I don't disagree with many of the points they make, but answer the farking question or admit you don't know!

/this one entry really stuck out to me as an example of non-excellence
//still go to Snopes first
///at least they show some of their work


Yeah, my biggest pet peeve about Snopes is that they sometimes give a deep three-level Freudian psychoanalysis of a story when I just want to know if it's true or not and how they know. They've gotten a bit better about it lately with the consistent use of the colored dots, although they'll sometimes say a story is a "mixture" if it's 99.9% false and the only breakdown of what is true and what isn't comes after three paragraphs of random crap.

/That said, sometimes I like all the analysis
 
2012-04-10 11:12:33 AM
Masso: Ok, am I missing some in-joke or meme about a Chinese Aesop?

I believe the joke has to do with putting inaccurate information in a headline for a link to a site whose purpose is debunking inaccurate information. Calling it a true story is another layer to the joke since Snopes rates the story as "Legend" rather than true.
 
2012-04-10 11:14:26 AM
Masso: Ok, am I missing some in-joke or meme about a Chinese Aesop?

Yes. Didn't you know that "Chinese Aesop" is an anagram of "Nice ass, Hopee", obviously referring to Southwestern Native American derrière.
 
2012-04-10 11:30:39 AM
dittybopper: wambu: Nothing new under the sun.

[i44.tinypic.com image 500x383]

Microchip technology - that's quite a new thing, isn't it?



Simplistic literalism. How does that work?
 
2012-04-10 11:32:17 AM
i0.kym-cdn.com
 
2012-04-10 12:18:49 PM
mortimer_ford: Ten minutes later, the phone rings at Hershel's house.

..and rings, ... and rings... and rings


Yeah, that's the more likely ending to that story. I like the punchline on the redneck one. "Happy birthday!"
 
2012-04-10 12:26:05 PM
That one about the KGB doesn't work.

They would have just taken the firewood.
 
2012-04-10 12:34:55 PM
nicoffeine: CrossEyed: Umm, last I heard, Aesop was Greek.

Aesop is only fully appreciated in the original Klingon.


That's what I came here to say. Curse you! But also, +1.
 
2012-04-10 01:06:56 PM
stevetherobot: dittybopper: CrossEyed: Umm, last I heard, Aesop was Greek.

Not according to the Chinese.

[images.wikia.com image 640x512]

Actually, he was Russian.

/Hot, like a nuclear wessel


nicoffeine: CrossEyed: Umm, last I heard, Aesop was Greek.

Aesop is only fully appreciated in the original Klingon.



I see we've gone full nerd in this thread.

i564.photobucket.com
 
2012-04-10 01:16:10 PM
I still think Snopes is wrong about Johnny Carson and Zsa Zsa's cat. I was very young but I'm 99% sure I saw the episode in question,

Snopes backs up it's claim of False, since the principals all denied it happened, for whatever reason. But a number of people I've met, including myself, remember the incident, including the walking off the stage in contempt afterwards. But no tapes, no proof, I guess. Maybe it really is a "manufactured memory".
 
2012-04-10 01:44:35 PM
Big_Fat_Liar: They couldn't stick to the real question which is "did these questions come from a 1895 Jr. High exam". They instead choose to create their own question which was ~"does this exam show a decline in education", a question nobody would turn to Snopes for because it is an obvious opinion. They answered their own question "False" without even addressing if the exam was actually given to students in 1895. I don't disagree with many of the points they make, but answer the farking question or admit you don't know!

I got that exam in an email, and the email I received did ask the snarky question, "could a junior-high student answer these questions today?"

Sadly, I threw it away as I don't keep trash around.
 
2012-04-10 02:22:38 PM
lenfromak: CrossEyed: Umm, last I heard, Aesop was Greek.

I thought it was a 1960s cartoon.

[www.toonarific.com image 318x229]


I thought the 1960s were a time, not a place.
 
2012-04-10 02:46:20 PM
wambu: dittybopper: wambu: Nothing new under the sun.

[i44.tinypic.com image 500x383]

Microchip technology - that's quite a new thing, isn't it?



Simplistic literalism. How does that work?


You might want to go here, and zoom ahead to the 8:00 minute mark.
 
2012-04-10 02:52:14 PM
Barnstormer: Maybe it really is a "manufactured memory".

Remember when you were six? You and your brother snuck into an empty building through a basement window. You were going to play doctor. He showed you his, but when it got to be your turn you chickened and ran; you remember that? You ever tell anybody that? Your mother, Tyrell, anybody? Remember the spider that lived outside your window? Orange body, green legs. Watched her build a web all summer, then one day there's a big egg in it. The egg hatched...
 
2012-04-10 09:29:40 PM
At first I thought a good way to get people to dig you some flower beds for free would be to call the police and say you buried some bodies in your back yard. But here's the catch: They dig everywhere, not just where you tell them to. - Jack Handey
 
2012-04-11 01:43:35 AM
That's a very, very, very old joke. It was probably told in every society that invented agriculture.

I'm sure the Ancient Chinese had a version of it as well as the Ancient Greeks, Indians, Japanese, Mayans, and what not. I have read many collections of historical jokes from my grandparent's time back to the earliest records of anecdotes and funny stories, including jokes from "Old Cathay" and familiar jokes pop up any century where somebody had the leisure and the literacy to write jokes down.

A lot of old jokes are impenetrably unfunny--there's no telling why anybody thought they were funny--perhaps even contemporarires found them groaners-- but a good joke like this passes from culture to culture and never dies, like the story of Cinderella (which does seem to have have originated in China), or popular sayings, which exist in thousands of languages provided they share common cultural memes such as fire-making, or buckets, or greedy mother-in-laws.
 
2012-04-11 02:18:09 AM
Big_Fat_Liar: duffblue: Was Snopes being a George Soros mouthpiece confirmed or denied?

Dunno about that, but Snopes isn't the final word on anything. For example, look at their coverage of the "1895 exam".

http://www.snopes.com/language/document/1895exam.asp

They couldn't stick to the real question which is "did these questions come from a 1895 Jr. High exam". They instead choose to create their own question which was ~"does this exam show a decline in education", a question nobody would turn to Snopes for because it is an obvious opinion. They answered their own question "False" without even addressing if the exam was actually given to students in 1895. I don't disagree with many of the points they make, but answer the farking question or admit you don't know!

/this one entry really stuck out to me as an example of non-excellence
//still go to Snopes first
///at least they show some of their work


Not to mention the fact that, on the occasion they get something wrong, anyone who pokes a hole in their explanation gets permabanned from the site. I emailed them once about the use of detergent to turn dishes of standing water into homemade mosquito traps, which they declared false on the grounds that, "while any mosquito that did try to land on the surface of such water would indeed be done like dinner, there is no reason for any mosquito to do so." I pointed out that, with the exception of a single mosquito species (Aedes), female mosquitoes must land on the surface of the water to lay their eggs there. Their response was to permanently shiatlist my email account, and I haven't bothered to register under another one, because why even bother? They're obviously not a scientific research site, but one of the internet's oldest and loudest echo chambers.
 
2012-04-11 04:47:10 AM
Tatterdemalian: Big_Fat_Liar: duffblue: Was Snopes being a George Soros mouthpiece confirmed or denied?

Dunno about that, but Snopes isn't the final word on anything. For example, look at their coverage of the "1895 exam".

http://www.snopes.com/language/document/1895exam.asp

They couldn't stick to the real question which is "did these questions come from a 1895 Jr. High exam". They instead choose to create their own question which was ~"does this exam show a decline in education", a question nobody would turn to Snopes for because it is an obvious opinion. They answered their own question "False" without even addressing if the exam was actually given to students in 1895. I don't disagree with many of the points they make, but answer the farking question or admit you don't know!

/this one entry really stuck out to me as an example of non-excellence
//still go to Snopes first
///at least they show some of their work

Not to mention the fact that, on the occasion they get something wrong, anyone who pokes a hole in their explanation gets permabanned from the site. I emailed them once about the use of detergent to turn dishes of standing water into homemade mosquito traps, which they declared false on the grounds that, "while any mosquito that did try to land on the surface of such water would indeed be done like dinner, there is no reason for any mosquito to do so." I pointed out that, with the exception of a single mosquito species (Aedes), female mosquitoes must land on the surface of the water to lay their eggs there. Their response was to permanently shiatlist my email account, and I haven't bothered to register under another one, because why even bother? They're obviously not a scientific research site, but one of the internet's oldest and loudest echo chambers.


You're assuming the lack of any other sources of standing water. That's why it's not really a "trap." There's no special reason for the mosquito to go there, other than it's water. Traps have bait, or are otherwise specially attractive to the victim. Did they explain this to you, or did you just write this, and they banned you?
 
2012-04-11 11:14:21 AM
nicoffeine: Tatterdemalian: Big_Fat_Liar: duffblue: Was Snopes being a George Soros mouthpiece confirmed or denied?

Dunno about that, but Snopes isn't the final word on anything. For example, look at their coverage of the "1895 exam".

http://www.snopes.com/language/document/1895exam.asp

They couldn't stick to the real question which is "did these questions come from a 1895 Jr. High exam". They instead choose to create their own question which was ~"does this exam show a decline in education", a question nobody would turn to Snopes for because it is an obvious opinion. They answered their own question "False" without even addressing if the exam was actually given to students in 1895. I don't disagree with many of the points they make, but answer the farking question or admit you don't know!

/this one entry really stuck out to me as an example of non-excellence
//still go to Snopes first
///at least they show some of their work

Not to mention the fact that, on the occasion they get something wrong, anyone who pokes a hole in their explanation gets permabanned from the site. I emailed them once about the use of detergent to turn dishes of standing water into homemade mosquito traps, which they declared false on the grounds that, "while any mosquito that did try to land on the surface of such water would indeed be done like dinner, there is no reason for any mosquito to do so." I pointed out that, with the exception of a single mosquito species (Aedes), female mosquitoes must land on the surface of the water to lay their eggs there. Their response was to permanently shiatlist my email account, and I haven't bothered to register under another one, because why even bother? They're obviously not a scientific research site, but one of the internet's oldest and loudest echo chambers.

You're assuming the lack of any other sources of standing water. That's why it's not really a "trap." There's no special reason for the mosquito to go there, other than it's water. Traps have bait ...


I'm guessing that his email to them contained the terms "dumbass" and/or "shiat for brains".
 
2012-04-12 09:08:36 AM
stevetherobot: You're assuming the lack of any other sources of standing water. That's why it's not really a "trap." There's no special reason for the mosquito to go there, other than it's water. Traps have bait ...I'm guessing that his email to them contained the terms "dumbass" and/or "shiat for brains".

Sure, the fact that I don't even use that kind of language on FARK proves I must have used it on Snopes. Whatever.

/at least the guy who pretended the water itself isn't bait to a mosquito in need of a place to lay eggs was funny, in a pathetic sort of way
 
Displayed 48 of 48 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report