If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Jennifer Love Hewitt: 'It's sexier not to show everything'. Millions of Farkers obviously not consulted   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 180
    More: Fail, Easter, old saying, nude, Jennifer Love Hewitt, wardrobe  
•       •       •

10373 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 09 Apr 2012 at 11:44 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



180 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-04-09 08:14:43 AM
This is what women actually believe.
 
2012-04-09 08:29:30 AM
No, she's right. Anyone who disagrees MAY be confusing sexy with lust. Not that there is anything wrong with that, just slightly different.
 
2012-04-09 08:39:41 AM
Agree with her on this.

There's more to "sexy" than just being naked. That's the idea behind slingshot bikinis and almost-but-not-quite-completely see-through lingerie.
 
2012-04-09 08:41:32 AM
No she's right...

Sexy is about anticipation and mystery, and maybe a little bit of tease.
 
2012-04-09 08:46:20 AM
Some women have ugly areolas. Not that I would notice if JLH were sitting on my face.
 
2012-04-09 08:47:50 AM

sno man: No she's right...

Sexy is about anticipation and mystery, and maybe a little bit of tease.


And THEN you show everything!
 
2012-04-09 08:47:50 AM
Oh lord, let this show tank so she resorts to posing nude.
 
2012-04-09 08:56:46 AM

King Something: Agree with her on this.

There's more to "sexy" than just being naked. That's the idea behind slingshot bikinis and almost-but-not-quite-completely see-through lingerie.



See, I've been with women who were really into the whole lingerie thing, and I honestly just find it sort of annoying. I like women who just want to be buck naked as quickly as possible when sex is in the offing. Don't get me wrong, I love a good strip, but it should end in complete nudity. Okay, maybe a piece of jewelry here or there, as long as it doesn't get in the way. I find the entire sexy underthings industry baffling.
 
2012-04-09 09:07:08 AM
static2.dmcdn.net
 
2012-04-09 09:12:55 AM

colinspooky: No, she's right. Anyone who disagrees MAY be confusing sexy with lust.


This...

Nothing quite like getting all lewd-n-nasty for the first time with a woman you knew was attractive, but until the big reveal you didn't have quite the indication that...well, wow...

Showing too much skin right off the bat takes all the fun out of it.
 
2012-04-09 09:15:27 AM
I don't think I mind another JLH thread this week.
 
2012-04-09 09:18:33 AM

TeddyBallGame: I don't think I mind another JLH thread this week.


And it's only Monday!!

/bunk
 
2012-04-09 09:35:57 AM

Sybarite: King Something: Agree with her on this.

There's more to "sexy" than just being naked. That's the idea behind slingshot bikinis and almost-but-not-quite-completely see-through lingerie.


See, I've been with women who were really into the whole lingerie thing, and I honestly just find it sort of annoying. I like women who just want to be buck naked as quickly as possible when sex is in the offing. Don't get me wrong, I love a good strip, but it should end in complete nudity. Okay, maybe a piece of jewelry here or there, as long as it doesn't get in the way. I find the entire sexy underthings industry baffling.


I completely concur. I find it much sexier for a woman to go from fully clothed to pure, sweet nakedidity. I guess I'm just not into the frilly things.
 
2012-04-09 09:57:04 AM
i predict she'll follow the trend of those women who made a career of teasing, and hit the playboy trail when nobody is interested anymore. 5 to 10 years.
 
2012-04-09 10:05:50 AM

Gulper Eel: Showing too much skin right off the bat takes all the fun out of it.


Yeah but JLH has been around for 15 years or more. Teasing's over. Time to make with the goods.
 
2012-04-09 10:08:36 AM

sno man: No she's right...

Sexy is about anticipation and mystery, and maybe a little bit of tease.


Which is why I always wear 6 snowsuits to every first date. Gotta drag it out as long as possible.
 
2012-04-09 10:23:23 AM
 
2012-04-09 10:58:13 AM

badscooter: Rich Cronin interview with Howard Stern about dating Jennifer Love Hewitt. (NSFW) (new window)


Continued NSFW (new window)


That's pretty good.
 
2012-04-09 11:08:39 AM

badscooter: Rich Cronin interview with Howard Stern about dating Jennifer Love Hewitt. (NSFW) (new window)


Continued NSFW (new window)



Wow, and that dude is dead now from complications with cancer. I wonder if she feels guilty?

Nah.
 
2012-04-09 11:28:40 AM
Her scenes in the Lifetime TV show require her to regularly be scantily clad in an array of lingerie, but the 33-year-old says she wouldn't have taken on the role if it required her to bare all.

IT'S F*CKING LIFETIME...THEY DON'T SHOW NUDITY ANYWAY.
 
2012-04-09 11:35:43 AM
Agrees:

img2.bdbphotos.com

/hot as this JLH picture (new window, PNSFW)
 
2012-04-09 11:50:41 AM
I question whether there are millions of Farkers.
 
2012-04-09 11:50:57 AM

sno man: No she's right...

Sexy is about anticipation and mystery, and maybe a little bit of tease.


that and having sex. there's not much in the world that is sexier than sex.
 
2012-04-09 11:52:05 AM

colinspooky: No, she's right. Anyone who disagrees MAY be confusing sexy with lust. Not that there is anything wrong with that, just slightly different.


I agree 100%, you can have clothes on and still be sexy but I would still like to test her theory since her being nude on film is probably the only way I will see her nude.
 
2012-04-09 11:57:16 AM
So, how much of JLH do Farkers want to see?

www.glitchtheshow.com

EVERYTHING!!!!
 
2012-04-09 11:57:35 AM

Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas. Not that I would notice if JLH were sitting on my face.

Those little bumps on the areolas are actually Braille for "suck here"
 
Skr
2012-04-09 11:57:44 AM
Oh yeah, Hide it all under your magnificent Ghost Whisperer MUUMUU collection *rolls eyes*

images.starpulse.com
 
2012-04-09 11:58:22 AM

miss diminutive: sno man: No she's right...

Sexy is about anticipation and mystery, and maybe a little bit of tease.

Which is why I always wear 6 snowsuits to every first date. Gotta drag it out as long as possible.


I like where this is going...
 
2012-04-09 12:00:28 PM
As you wish,vajazzled vixen,as you wish....
 
2012-04-09 12:02:57 PM
In the last 24 years the only woman to win best actress at the Oscars that has NOT appeared nude at one time or another in a film is Cher.
 
2012-04-09 12:03:09 PM
Once you know what's in the package, don't matter how you wrap it.
 
2012-04-09 12:06:12 PM

King Something: Agree with her on this.

There's more to "sexy" than just being naked. That's the idea behind slingshot bikinis and almost-but-not-quite-completely see-through lingerie.


There is a name for this phenomenon: Theiss Titillation Theory (new window).

/TVTropes
 
2012-04-09 12:07:03 PM

foo monkey: [static2.dmcdn.net image 160x120]


This
 
2012-04-09 12:09:16 PM
I agree with her 100%.
t2.gstatic.com
 
2012-04-09 12:11:38 PM
Mons pubis, Love, or GTFO.
 
2012-04-09 12:12:10 PM

Sybarite: King Something: Agree with her on this.

There's more to "sexy" than just being naked. That's the idea behind slingshot bikinis and almost-but-not-quite-completely see-through lingerie.


See, I've been with women who were really into the whole lingerie thing, and I honestly just find it sort of annoying. I like women who just want to be buck naked as quickly as possible when sex is in the offing. Don't get me wrong, I love a good strip, but it should end in complete nudity. Okay, maybe a piece of jewelry here or there, as long as it doesn't get in the way. I find the entire sexy underthings industry baffling.


Lingerie is for women. It's to help make them feel sexy. Even if it's not a turn on for you, pretend it is when the opportunity arises..
 
2012-04-09 12:14:45 PM
There's something about that woman that makes me think she's a prude in the sack, like 'don't you dare take your socks off before you fark me.'
 
2012-04-09 12:14:57 PM
Women just strip off their clothes and jump on the bed for me. Sometimes before dinner is ever over.

/It's a curse...
 
2012-04-09 12:16:34 PM
Well, speaking as a straight male, I think it can be sexier, but after a while a guy can take only so much teasing. See Denise Milani, for example. So, basically it's tits or GTFO.
 
2012-04-09 12:16:50 PM

Sybarite: King Something: Agree with her on this.

There's more to "sexy" than just being naked. That's the idea behind slingshot bikinis and almost-but-not-quite-completely see-through lingerie.


See, I've been with women who were really into the whole lingerie thing, and I honestly just find it sort of annoying. I like women who just want to be buck naked as quickly as possible when sex is in the offing. Don't get me wrong, I love a good strip, but it should end in complete nudity. Okay, maybe a piece of jewelry here or there, as long as it doesn't get in the way. I find the entire sexy underthings industry baffling.


I like wrapping paper.
 
2012-04-09 12:17:23 PM
She's the Pattycake of legitimate actresses.
 
2012-04-09 12:21:14 PM

LeroyBourne: There's something about that woman that makes me think she's a prude in the sack, like 'don't you dare take your socks off before you fark me.'



It's just the opposite for me: I suspect she's an absolute tigress in sack based solely on her quirks.
 
2012-04-09 12:25:34 PM

HotIgneous Intruder: Women just strip off their clothes and jump on the bed for me. Sometimes before dinner is ever over.

/It's a curse...


Learn to cook better?

;-)
 
2012-04-09 12:26:13 PM
I find the lack of pictures in this thread disturbing


celebslife.net
 
2012-04-09 12:30:03 PM
mujer.orange.es

www.sineljefe.com

3.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-04-09 12:32:12 PM

miss diminutive: sno man: No she's right...

Sexy is about anticipation and mystery, and maybe a little bit of tease.

Which is why I always wear 6 snowsuits to every first date. Gotta drag it out as long as possible.


That sounds hot. Like really overheated. And sweaty.
 
2012-04-09 12:33:19 PM
images.hotcelebshome.com

images.hotcelebshome.com

i43.tinypic.com
 
2012-04-09 12:34:59 PM

Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.


This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman
 
2012-04-09 12:39:46 PM

Apos: LeroyBourne: There's something about that woman that makes me think she's a prude in the sack, like 'don't you dare take your socks off before you fark me.'


It's just the opposite for me: I suspect she's an absolute tigress in sack based solely on her quirks.


I posted before listening to that Howard Stern interview(posted above), yeah, she might be a hell cat.
 
2012-04-09 12:42:06 PM

Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman




It can be a distraction
(NSFW)
 
2012-04-09 12:42:13 PM
Too late, Miss Vajazzle. Too late.
 
2012-04-09 12:42:54 PM
Actually, the trick is to show everything, just not all at once.
 
2012-04-09 12:43:09 PM
She should pose naked before her ass gets titanic again
 
2012-04-09 12:48:07 PM

Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


www.vh1.com

The above image was the first image on page 3 for an "ugly areolas" GIS.

Coincidence, I think not.
 
2012-04-09 12:49:00 PM
I rather enjoyed her titanic ass.
 
2012-04-09 12:52:23 PM
Meh. Tits or GTFO
 
2012-04-09 01:05:09 PM
What, no one has posted that unflatting backside shot of her on the beach yet? You Farkers are slacking in your predictability.
 
2012-04-09 01:08:48 PM
I totally agree with her. I'm more attracted to a gal in short black dress and heels, than a bikini.
 
2012-04-09 01:08:58 PM

djZorbof: I rather enjoyed her titanic ass.


Her ass will go on.
 
2012-04-09 01:09:30 PM
www.thebrusselsjungle.com

X 2
 
2012-04-09 01:12:08 PM
Remember, brevity is the soul of lingerie.
 
2012-04-09 01:13:18 PM
You usually hear that from women when they start to show the effects of gravity.
 
2012-04-09 01:17:49 PM
Howard Stern interviews were neato.
Funny that JLH is a Playa'
 
2012-04-09 01:19:14 PM
She has sex with the lights off, doesn't she?

sigh.....
 
2012-04-09 01:19:42 PM

Midnight Rambler: Sybarite: King Something: Agree with her on this.

There's more to "sexy" than just being naked. That's the idea behind slingshot bikinis and almost-but-not-quite-completely see-through lingerie.


See, I've been with women who were really into the whole lingerie thing, and I honestly just find it sort of annoying. I like women who just want to be buck naked as quickly as possible when sex is in the offing. Don't get me wrong, I love a good strip, but it should end in complete nudity. Okay, maybe a piece of jewelry here or there, as long as it doesn't get in the way. I find the entire sexy underthings industry baffling.

I completely concur. I find it much sexier for a woman to go from fully clothed to pure, sweet nakedidity. I guess I'm just not into the frilly things.


Naked except for thigh high boots makes me go boing.
 
2012-04-09 01:24:52 PM

advex101: You usually hear that from women when they start to show the effects of gravity.


Believe it or not, there are many women who don't want to show their naked bodies to millions of wanking strangers, no matter how good they look. And they don't really care if you disapprove, either.
 
2012-04-09 01:25:51 PM
Without those high heels her legs are fat.
 
2012-04-09 01:27:40 PM
Is it a coincidence that her career peaked before her looks tanked?
 
2012-04-09 01:31:21 PM

chopit: Naked except for thigh high boots makes me go boing.


This. Thigh-highs - always good.
 
2012-04-09 01:32:28 PM
Can't listen to the stern interview at work...is she a prude or a freak?
 
2012-04-09 01:34:32 PM

CigaretteSmokingMan: Without those high heels her legs are fat.


And without the internet, you're hideous.


/I don't know that you're hideous, just making a point.
 
2012-04-09 01:38:14 PM

Detinwolf: chopit: Naked except for thigh high boots makes me go boing.

This. Thigh-highs - always good.


I like the cuts of your jibs.

Legs deep in the boots.
Boots all up on the heel.
Yes, the kind that make a certain type of fetishist squeal.
 
2012-04-09 01:44:40 PM

Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman



I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.
 
2012-04-09 01:49:32 PM

Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.


islamwatch2010.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-04-09 01:53:16 PM

WienerButt: Can't listen to the stern interview at work...is she a prude or a freak?


She's a boy-eater. Dates around, plays games, gives numerous guys she's farking the same very special ring from "Tiffany&Co." This guy in the interview sounds like a cretin, too.
 
2012-04-09 01:54:57 PM

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.

[islamwatch2010.files.wordpress.com image 640x407]


WTF?? Now I have to go back to the short skirt thread to get that out of my head.
 
2012-04-09 01:55:12 PM

Sybarite: I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.




My gf in HS had a subscription to the then-new magazine "Sassy" which was aimed at 15-21 year old gals.

I am one of those people who MUST read on the can, Like, I'll read a shampoo bottle if I can't have regular reading material.

Anyway, I'll never forget where some chic wrote in and asked "What do I do about nipple hair?" Having only had maybe 3 girls at that point, I had not encountered it, and didn't know it was an issue. Kinda freaked me out.

Of course, all these years later, as I approach 40, I've come across a lil nipple hair on a gal or three. No big deal, but yeah, kinda odd. Its one of those things you don't find out about until you're "in the moment", so you kinda have to let it go, and not let it be a deal breaker.

Bear in mind, there about a hundred things about your hairy sweaty stinky man existence that she overlooks.

And as far as the subject of TFA is concerned, angry god, love to disappoint, etc.
 
2012-04-09 02:00:15 PM

Glenford: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.



Yes, my first girlfriend (whom I saw and cavorted with sans clothing) had this situation. Also, her ass cheeks were hairier than mine.

When I got the next girlfriend, I was able to fully enjoy a silky smooth ass and hairless nipples. Oh, what I had been missing!
 
2012-04-09 02:00:43 PM

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.

[islamwatch2010.files.wordpress.com image 640x407]


No hairy boobs story. A very hot co ed in Austin...met her at a pool party, and she looked realy good in a two piece bikini. But even drunk, I noticed she had a hairy ass.

Same as above, she was trimmed and had no overly body hair anywhere else...just, on her ass. I did search her body for more wolfman-like patches of fur, she probably thought I was so into her body (it was very nice, sans butt hair).

I ran into her a few more times b/c of mutual friends, but I just couldn't bring myself, even uber drunk, to hit it again. I was weirded out.

/yeah right, I so hit that again
 
2012-04-09 02:01:33 PM

Embden.Meyerhof: Glenford: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.


Yes, my first girlfriend (whom I saw and cavorted with sans clothing) had this situation. Also, her ass cheeks were hairier than mine.

When I got the next girlfriend, I was able to fully enjoy a silky smooth ass and hairless nipples. Oh, what I had been missing!


hairy-girl-ass simulpost.
 
2012-04-09 02:06:55 PM

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman



It can be a distraction (NSFW)


Nothing distracting about pepperonis
 
2012-04-09 02:08:18 PM

Glenford: short skirt thread


Thank you!
 
2012-04-09 02:11:01 PM

23FPB23: Sybarite: I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.



My gf in HS had a subscription to the then-new magazine "Sassy" which was aimed at 15-21 year old gals.

I am one of those people who MUST read on the can, Like, I'll read a shampoo bottle if I can't have regular reading material.

Anyway, I'll never forget where some chic wrote in and asked "What do I do about nipple hair?" Having only had maybe 3 girls at that point, I had not encountered it, and didn't know it was an issue. Kinda freaked me out.

Of course, all these years later, as I approach 40, I've come across a lil nipple hair on a gal or three. No big deal, but yeah, kinda odd. Its one of those things you don't find out about until you're "in the moment", so you kinda have to let it go, and not let it be a deal breaker.

Bear in mind, there about a hundred things about your hairy sweaty stinky man existence that she overlooks.

And as far as the subject of TFA is concerned, angry god, love to disappoint, etc.


I had a GF in college that had one hair on her breast that was like an inch and a half long. I concentrated on the other. In any case it was eerily reminiscent of a documentary I saw on Guinea Worm Disease *shudder*
 
2012-04-09 02:23:02 PM

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.

[islamwatch2010.files.wordpress.com image 640x407]



Yikes! This is what I imagine Khloe Kardashian's tatas look like.
 
2012-04-09 02:29:18 PM
I totally agree with her...Besides it's really fun to unwrap your gift.
 
2012-04-09 02:30:03 PM
i8.photobucket.com
 
2012-04-09 02:32:42 PM

Apos: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.

[islamwatch2010.files.wordpress.com image 640x407]


Yikes! This is what I imagine Khloe Kardashian's tatas look like.


Surprisingly they aren't THAT big...NSFW
 
2012-04-09 03:18:22 PM

Colour_out_of_Space: S
Lingerie is for women. It's to help make them feel sexy. Even if it's not a turn on for you, pretend it is when the opportunity arises..


My wife does the lingerie and it's cool. But she's still confused as to why I get all excited when she's running around the house in a t-shirt and panties.

Having said that, Hewitt ain't that great. She's a solid 7.
 
2012-04-09 03:20:53 PM

HotIgneous Intruder: WienerButt: Can't listen to the stern interview at work...is she a prude or a freak?

She's a boy-eater. Dates around, plays games, gives numerous guys she's farking the same very special ring from "Tiffany&Co." This guy in the interview sounds like a cretin, too.


Ha! So she treats guys the way that plenty of actors treat the women in their lives. Good.
 
2012-04-09 03:23:18 PM

Rent Party: Colour_out_of_Space: S
Lingerie is for women. It's to help make them feel sexy. Even if it's not a turn on for you, pretend it is when the opportunity arises..

My wife does the lingerie and it's cool. But she's still confused as to why I get all excited when she's running around the house in a t-shirt and panties.

Having said that, Hewitt ain't that great. She's a solid 7.


What's your wife, a 5?
 
2012-04-09 03:25:28 PM

Heron: HotIgneous Intruder: WienerButt: Can't listen to the stern interview at work...is she a prude or a freak?

She's a boy-eater. Dates around, plays games, gives numerous guys she's farking the same very special ring from "Tiffany&Co." This guy in the interview sounds like a cretin, too.

Ha! So she treats guys the way that plenty of actors treat the women in their lives. Good.


She can use my body as much she wishes and should expect nothing but praise and affection from me.
 
2012-04-09 03:28:57 PM

Rent Party: Colour_out_of_Space: S
Lingerie is for women. It's to help make them feel sexy. Even if it's not a turn on for you, pretend it is when the opportunity arises..

My wife does the lingerie and it's cool. But she's still confused as to why I get all excited when she's running around the house in a t-shirt and panties.

Having said that, Hewitt ain't that great. She's a solid 7.


i48.photobucket.com
 
2012-04-09 03:29:33 PM

Rent Party: Colour_out_of_Space: S
Lingerie is for women. It's to help make them feel sexy. Even if it's not a turn on for you, pretend it is when the opportunity arises..

My wife does the lingerie and it's cool. But she's still confused as to why I get all excited when she's running around the house in a t-shirt and panties.


I love when she does that too. Tell her I said hello.
 
2012-04-09 03:43:58 PM
FATASS McTubbs.
 
2012-04-09 03:46:01 PM

Jake Havechek: Rent Party: Colour_out_of_Space: S
Lingerie is for women. It's to help make them feel sexy. Even if it's not a turn on for you, pretend it is when the opportunity arises..

My wife does the lingerie and it's cool. But she's still confused as to why I get all excited when she's running around the house in a t-shirt and panties.

Having said that, Hewitt ain't that great. She's a solid 7.

What's your wife, a 5?


Rent Party's wife is way better than a 5 when she's running in just a t-shirt and panties.
 
2012-04-09 03:48:23 PM
I can literally see the truth in her statement.

images2.fanpop.com
 
2012-04-09 03:54:24 PM

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman



It can be a distraction (NSFW)


Are those slices of baloney?
 
2012-04-09 03:55:57 PM

Jake Havechek: Rent Party: Colour_out_of_Space: S
Lingerie is for women. It's to help make them feel sexy. Even if it's not a turn on for you, pretend it is when the opportunity arises..

My wife does the lingerie and it's cool. But she's still confused as to why I get all excited when she's running around the house in a t-shirt and panties.

Having said that, Hewitt ain't that great. She's a solid 7.

What's your wife, a 5?


She is an 11. Hewitt has nice tits, a weird face, and a fat ass. There are, right now, a small army of much hotter women in Hollywood, and your town, too.
 
2012-04-09 03:56:19 PM
The good news is she is a real woman, wearing high heels while playing tennis and all.

images2.fanpop.com
 
2012-04-09 03:59:11 PM

hinten: The good news is she is a real woman, wearing high heels while playing tennis and all.

[images2.fanpop.com image 586x1100]


Aside from the ill-advised footwear,I see nothing that I can't work with.
 
2012-04-09 04:00:11 PM
I like the part where her boobs.
 
2012-04-09 04:02:37 PM
I do reserve the right to say - Tits or GTFO

/my wife understands
 
2012-04-09 04:10:24 PM
Maybe I just missed her super heyday but I've never really gotten the huge adoration for her.

She's attractive, but not 11/10 like everyone seems to think. She's just kinda average hot?
 
2012-04-09 04:12:32 PM
Clothed or naked, I'd wreck that.
 
2012-04-09 04:26:14 PM

kroonermanblack: Maybe I just missed her super heyday but I've never really gotten the huge adoration for her.

She's attractive, but not 11/10 like everyone seems to think. She's just kinda average hot?



She is attractive
i39.tinypic.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
Here's the huge adoration
i41.tinypic.com
 
2012-04-09 04:27:29 PM

hinten:

[images2.fanpop.com image 640x960]
[images2.fanpop.com image 586x1100]


Only reinforces my assertion that...

i457.photobucket.com
 
2012-04-09 04:32:25 PM
I think sexy has a lot more to do with setting than what the person is wearing or not wearing. If I were at a seminar on network security and the woman giving the presentation was completely nude talking about windows server 2010 I wouldn't find her very sexy. Now a woman could be wearing a suit and dancing or talking seductively and I would find that very sexy. When we are talking about an actor though playing a part in a sexual scene if she doesn't become nude it is not very sexy, because it just looks un-natural due to the fact that women don't wear a bra during sex or have the sheets pulled up to their necks.
 
2012-04-09 04:37:03 PM

Profedius: I think sexy has a lot more to do with setting than what the person is wearing or not wearing. If I were at a seminar on network security and the woman giving the presentation was completely nude talking about windows server 2010 I wouldn't find her very sexy. Now a woman could be wearing a suit and dancing or talking seductively and I would find that very sexy. When we are talking about an actor though playing a part in a sexual scene if she doesn't become nude it is not very sexy, because it just looks un-natural due to the fact that women don't wear a bra during sex or have the sheets pulled up to their necks.


Are you suggesting that naked women conversing about active directory structures or the latest advances in windows server tech don't give you the weirdest boner???

Because the thought of that gives me the weirdest boner.
 
2012-04-09 04:46:58 PM
She's right, at least for me.

Hiding just the right amount kicks the imagination into overdrive. I'm not going to kick a naked woman out of my bed mind you, but the fantasies the brain can generate when given just enough to set it into motion do more to arouse and generate desire than nakedness.

For instance, a woman in just a button down shirt is far sexier than just plain old nakedness. "Is she wearing panties?" is just one of the million questions racing through your brain.
 
2012-04-09 04:48:11 PM
Drawing the line: Jennifer Love Hewitt says she would have refused her role on The Client List if it required her to go nude

icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-04-09 04:54:36 PM

meat0918: She's right, at least for me.

Hiding just the right amount kicks the imagination into overdrive. I'm not going to kick a naked woman out of my bed mind you, but the fantasies the brain can generate when given just enough to set it into motion do more to arouse and generate desire than nakedness.

For instance, a woman in just a button down shirt is far sexier than just plain old nakedness. "Is she wearing panties?" is just one of the million questions racing through your brain.


A good looking woman in a mostly unbuttoned button down shirt, and a good pair of panties(no granny panties.. ugh), is the hottest thing ever. Having that shirt drape over here covering up just enough to let your imagination run wile. You just wanna rip that shirt off her and go to town because its soooo hot.

/Flat chested women need not apply. Sorry you need tatas to pull that look off.
 
2012-04-09 04:56:28 PM
She's not completely wrong, sometimes. The problem is that a lot of the random paparazzi candids show proof that even if we got what we wanted, there'd be a ton of airbrushing nowadays on her body, given that she hasn't kept it in absolute impossible perfection like it was when she was doing the I Know What You Did Last Summer's.

She could've had the world if she had done it at least ten years ago. But she didn't, and we'll all be left wondering "what if."
 
2012-04-09 05:02:43 PM

Strategeryz0r: meat0918: She's right, at least for me.

Hiding just the right amount kicks the imagination into overdrive. I'm not going to kick a naked woman out of my bed mind you, but the fantasies the brain can generate when given just enough to set it into motion do more to arouse and generate desire than nakedness.

For instance, a woman in just a button down shirt is far sexier than just plain old nakedness. "Is she wearing panties?" is just one of the million questions racing through your brain.

A good looking woman in a mostly unbuttoned button down shirt, and a good pair of panties(no granny panties.. ugh), is the hottest thing ever. Having that shirt drape over her covering up just enough to let your imagination run wild. You just wanna rip that shirt off her and go to town because its soooo hot.

/Flat chested women need not apply. Sorry you need tatas to pull that look off.


Holy shiat I just noticed all the typos. FTFM

/sorry, had a hell of a weekend. And not in a good way.
//been living wherever I can for the last 3 days
///Divorce time :( :(
 
2012-04-09 05:05:30 PM

Strategeryz0r:
/sorry, had a hell of a weekend. And not in a good way.
//been living wherever I can for the last 3 days
///Divorce time :( :(


It's gonna get worse before it gets better, but it does get better.
 
2012-04-09 05:12:55 PM

Rent Party: Strategeryz0r:
/sorry, had a hell of a weekend. And not in a good way.
//been living wherever I can for the last 3 days
///Divorce time :( :(

It's gonna get worse before it gets better, but it does get better.


How much worse can it get? I already had the call the cops on her because she was refusing to let me into my own house to gather some clothes and essentials for me to survive, all the while threatening to shoot me if I tried to get inside.

/serious
//no, really...
 
2012-04-09 05:19:18 PM

Strategeryz0r: Rent Party: Strategeryz0r:
/sorry, had a hell of a weekend. And not in a good way.
//been living wherever I can for the last 3 days
///Divorce time :( :(

It's gonna get worse before it gets better, but it does get better.

How much worse can it get? I already had the call the cops on her because she was refusing to let me into my own house to gather some clothes and essentials for me to survive, all the while threatening to shoot me if I tried to get inside.

/serious
//no, really...


It will get worse when the lawyers get involved, and she tells the judge that she had to do that because you were acting in a threatening manner, and she feels that you're a danger to her and the kids (if there's kids). It will get worse when you end up paying her to live in the house. It will get worse when Bobby the Bad Boy Biker Boyfriend shacks up in your house, that as mentioned, you are paying her to live in. It will get worse when she maxes out all of her credit cards and then insists you pay for them. It will get worse in all kinds of creative ways you can't even imagine yet.

But it will get better. So hang on.
 
2012-04-09 05:23:12 PM

FinFangFark: Apos: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.

[islamwatch2010.files.wordpress.com image 640x407]


Yikes! This is what I imagine Khloe Kardashian's tatas look like.

Surprisingly they aren't THAT big...NSFW


I'd get lead poisoning for that.
 
2012-04-09 05:25:10 PM

Rent Party: Strategeryz0r: Rent Party: Strategeryz0r:
/sorry, had a hell of a weekend. And not in a good way.
//been living wherever I can for the last 3 days
///Divorce time :( :(

It's gonna get worse before it gets better, but it does get better.

How much worse can it get? I already had the call the cops on her because she was refusing to let me into my own house to gather some clothes and essentials for me to survive, all the while threatening to shoot me if I tried to get inside.

/serious
//no, really...

It will get worse when the lawyers get involved, and she tells the judge that she had to do that because you were acting in a threatening manner, and she feels that you're a danger to her and the kids (if there's kids). It will get worse when you end up paying her to live in the house. It will get worse when Bobby the Bad Boy Biker Boyfriend shacks up in your house, that as mentioned, you are paying her to live in. It will get worse when she maxes out all of her credit cards and then insists you pay for them. It will get worse in all kinds of creative ways you can't even imagine yet.

But it will get better. So hang on.


thankfully I've convinced her to do this the easy way. We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years, and I have no record of being threatening towards her or abusive in any way. Whereas I have her, on a text message, threatening to kill me for no reason. When you can read the prior messages and see I was being more than nice considering what she was saying to me. I just want to split our crap, split the money, and go our separate ways. Not to mention the house is leased in my name, and I intend to file my 30 days with the property manager in the not too distant future so I can move somewhere a bit cheaper and begin rebuilding my life.

Thanks for the kind words though, really. Sleeping on the floor of my office last night kind of gave me a new perspective on things. And I'm sure a half dozen new back problems...
 
2012-04-09 05:31:04 PM
Some guy in this thread really just said his wife was an 11 and that JLH is not that hot. Thanks man, funniest shiat I've read on the internet today.
 
2012-04-09 05:32:06 PM

Strategeryz0r: How much worse can it get?


A rough few days isn't so bad compared to, say, getting 3/4 of your wages garnished for kids(not even touching alimony) that are well over 18, and not even living with her...gets you thrown in jail for not paying "back" payments(IE the ruling just happened, and you don't have 18grand laying around).

I'm single and childless, but I've seem some pretty horrid shiat that some women can and will pull because they can work up the tears in front of a judge or some other official.

Of course, my example came from a divorcing couple where she worked in an office that deals with such things, so she had judges and lawyers and child services more or less in her pocket from the get go.

Much of it can get fixed later on, if you find a competent lawyer, may have to move quite a distance away though. The unfortunate guy above had to move out of the state entirely, and then hire a lawyer there.
 
2012-04-09 05:41:24 PM
I agree. Leaving something on makes you want to jump her so you can take it off, then bite her. Naked is fine, but leaving something on teases you and makes you want it more.
 
2012-04-09 05:42:32 PM

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: [mujer.orange.es image 450x724]

[www.sineljefe.com image 480x716]

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 640x942]


Holy crap Ghost Whisperer made it to 100 episodes.
 
2012-04-09 05:42:57 PM

omeganuepsilon: A rough few days isn't so bad compared to, say, getting 3/4 of your wages garnished for kids(not even touching alimony) that are well over 18, and not even living with her...gets you thrown in jail for not paying "back" payments(IE the ruling just happened, and you don't have 18grand laying around).


You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.
 
2012-04-09 05:43:46 PM

Strategeryz0r:
thankfully I've convinced her to do this the easy way. We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years, and I have no record of being threatening towards her or abusive in any way. Whereas I have her, on a text message, threatening to kill me for no reason. When you can read the prior messages and see I was being more than nice considering what she was saying to me. I just want to split our crap, split the money, and go our separate ways. Not to mention the house is leased in my name, and I intend to file my 30 days with the property manager in the not too distant future so I can move somewhere a bit cheaper and begin rebuilding my life.

Thanks for the kind words though, really. Sleeping on the floor of my office last night kind of gave me a new perspective on things. And I'm sure a half dozen new back problems...


I slept in my car while she was off in Vegas. Good times!

Anyway, never, ever, count on the reasonableness of the courts or what you think the evidence will show. You're in a good position in that you don't own the house and you don't have any kids, but that doesn't mean the judge is going to be all reasonable and fair.

If there are any assets at all involved, lawyer up, because she will.
 
2012-04-09 05:46:34 PM

madgonad: omeganuepsilon: A rough few days isn't so bad compared to, say, getting 3/4 of your wages garnished for kids(not even touching alimony) that are well over 18, and not even living with her...gets you thrown in jail for not paying "back" payments(IE the ruling just happened, and you don't have 18grand laying around).

You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.


Theoretically, anyway.

I pay over $1200 a month in child support and another $500 on top of that for maintenance, which she's been getting for the last seven years. I took that to court four years ago and the judge told me TFB, "I'm not going too remove it from this mother at this time..."

You know, because she was heading to Vegas the next week to spend it, but whatever....

Oh yeah, that's in addition to the ~$800 I'm averaging a month for child care, which happens in her house.
 
2012-04-09 05:47:14 PM

Rent Party: Strategeryz0r:
thankfully I've convinced her to do this the easy way. We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years, and I have no record of being threatening towards her or abusive in any way. Whereas I have her, on a text message, threatening to kill me for no reason. When you can read the prior messages and see I was being more than nice considering what she was saying to me. I just want to split our crap, split the money, and go our separate ways. Not to mention the house is leased in my name, and I intend to file my 30 days with the property manager in the not too distant future so I can move somewhere a bit cheaper and begin rebuilding my life.

Thanks for the kind words though, really. Sleeping on the floor of my office last night kind of gave me a new perspective on things. And I'm sure a half dozen new back problems...

I slept in my car while she was off in Vegas. Good times!

Anyway, never, ever, count on the reasonableness of the courts or what you think the evidence will show. You're in a good position in that you don't own the house and you don't have any kids, but that doesn't mean the judge is going to be all reasonable and fair.

If there are any assets at all involved, lawyer up, because she will.


Actually, if it wasn't for how farkin cold it is outside still(Idaho.. ugh I hate our weather), I would love to be sleeping in my car over the floor of my office. BMW seats are magical when you can't get a real bed.

Yea, she wants her half of the money soon. I told her if she takes me to court she wont see one red cent from me until a judge orders it. So if she wants anything from me, she's playing ball. And that includes forfeiting her rights(in writing, and witnessed) to take me to court. I want to settle this outside, amicably. The easy way. If she wants her equal share without contest, then she needs to work with me to accomplish that. Otherwise I will make her life a living hell.
 
2012-04-09 05:55:23 PM

SmellsLikePoo: FinFangFark: Apos: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.

[islamwatch2010.files.wordpress.com image 640x407]


Yikes! This is what I imagine Khloe Kardashian's tatas look like.

Surprisingly they aren't THAT big...NSFW

I'd get lead poisoning for that.


Except the fact that that is Kim, not Chewwie.
 
2012-04-09 05:55:59 PM
I don't know about all of this "leave something to the imagination" stuff. I can imagine some pretty nasty things, but unless you are doing them to me then I might as well jerk off. Sexy is spreading eagle with a wide open mouth ready to go.
 
2012-04-09 06:02:02 PM

madgonad: You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.


Yeah...gonna go with your experience is either grossly limited or you're actually white-knighting family court. I've had direct experience with several cases where the mother was awarded both child support AND maintenance where the father had custody of the child, and the mother had visitation. I've also seen mothers awarded over 75% of the fathers income to the point where it was literally impossible for the father to make enough to support himself while paying for support, even though he had split custody. The second case he just quit working and let them garnish his unemployment while he fought the decision. For almost 2 years. The mother, in that particular case, had a record for drug abuse, and the children were on record as having witnessed her abusing drugs, and the court STILL upheld the decision.

Family court is pretty farking messed up.
 
2012-04-09 06:08:04 PM

Barry McCackiner: Sexy is spreading eagle with a wide open mouth ready to go.


Ladies must be beating down your door.
 
2012-04-09 06:08:13 PM

kasmel: madgonad: You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.

Yeah...gonna go with your experience is either grossly limited or you're actually white-knighting family court. I've had direct experience with several cases where the mother was awarded both child support AND maintenance where the father had custody of the child, and the mother had visitation. I've also seen mothers awarded over 75% of the fathers income to the point where it was literally impossible for the father to make enough to support himself while paying for support, even though he had split custody. The second case he just quit working and let them garnish his unemployment while he fought the decision. For almost 2 years. The mother, in that particular case, had a record for drug abuse, and the children were on record as having witnessed her abusing drugs, and the court STILL upheld the decision.

Family court is pretty farking messed up.


Yea, especially in Idaho. This place is a total mommy/wife state. Thats why I'm doing everything I can to convince her to keep this out of the courts, and to keep lawyers from getting involved.

Despite the fact that the job she has is the same job she had before we met(that she was supporting herself just fine with), the fact that I have no record of being abusive towards her in any capacity, and even with a text message from her clearly threatening my life for trying to get into my own house(with 0 justification for that kind of threat).... They would probably still award her some form of spousal support because that's just how one-sided our courts here are.

So, sadly, I have to play hardball to try and keep it out of there. And that means leveraging everything from keeping her from the emergency dental surgery she needs by removing her from my insurance, to using the fact her car is completely under my name to my advantage. I could royally mess up her life if I wanted to, but I don't. I want to make this easy, so I extended the olive branch of work with me and I'll make this easy on both of us. Make this difficult, and you have no clue what you're getting yourself into.
 
2012-04-09 06:30:44 PM

Soup4Bonnie: Barry McCackiner: Sexy is spreading eagle with a wide open mouth ready to go.

Ladies must be beating down your door.


to get out?? Yes, I am sure that they are!
 
2012-04-09 06:44:47 PM

Strategeryz0r: kasmel: madgonad: You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.

Yeah...gonna go with your experience is either grossly limited or you're actually white-knighting family court. I've had direct experience with several cases where the mother was awarded both child support AND maintenance where the father had custody of the child, and the mother had visitation. I've also seen mothers awarded over 75% of the fathers income to the point where it was literally impossible for the father to make enough to support himself while paying for support, even though he had split custody. The second case he just quit working and let them garnish his unemployment while he fought the decision. For almost 2 years. The mother, in that particular case, had a record for drug abuse, and the children were on record as having witnessed her abusing drugs, and the court STILL upheld the decision.

Family court is pretty farking messed up.

Yea, especially in Idaho. This place is a total mommy/wife state. Thats why I'm doing everything I can to convince her to keep this out of the courts, and to keep lawyers from getting involved.

Despite the fact that the job she has is the same job she had before we met(that she was supporting herself just fine with), the fact that I have no record of being abusive towards her in any capacity, and even with a text message from her clearly threatening my life for trying to get into my own house(with 0 justificat ...


You are lucky as hell you don't have kids is all I'm gonna say. I have a co-worker who got divorced 2 years ago and they have 2 kids. She held a loaded gun on him, and she got busted for that, 2 DUI's within 3 months of each other, and had the kids temporarily taken away from her for 6 months when she got so drunk the kids couldn't wake her and the eldest (9 years old at the time) called 911. Despite this, Social Services recommended she retain primary custody after she finished her counseling and my co worker gets the kids 3 weekends a month, has to pay her about 40% of each paycheck in child support, and has to pay for health insurance for the kids. The system is so freaking biased against men in some areas it's ridiculous.
 
2012-04-09 06:46:50 PM

kasmel: madgonad: You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.

Yeah...gonna go with your experience is either grossly limited or you're actually white-knighting family court. I've had direct experience with several cases where the mother was awarded both child support AND maintenance where the father had custody of the child, and the mother had visitation. I've also seen mothers awarded over 75% of the fathers income to the point where it was literally impossible for the father to make enough to support himself while paying for support, even though he had split custody. The second case he just quit working and let them garnish his unemployment while he fought the decision. For almost 2 years. The mother, in that particular case, had a record for drug abuse, and the children were on record as having witnessed her abusing drugs, and the court STILL upheld the decision.

Family court is pretty farking messed up.


This. The extremes can be bad(I never implied it always was, but that it can be), despite all the legalese supposedly limiting it, it does happen, and all too often.

A smart lawyer, and/or crooked/extremely biased judge, and you ARE going to get people who get majorly screwed no matter what they do unless they've got tons of money to throw at excellent top shelf lawyers(and even then...).

Sad state of affairs, but we're gaining ground...well, it's an ongoing battle.... You can still see how a lynch mob is right around the corner for society though, look at the whole Zimmerman thing going on.

Strategeryz0r: We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years


That's a good deal, kids almost always make proceedings worse. Wish you the best of luck.
 
2012-04-09 06:59:30 PM
As I get older, I realize that a lot of 'sexy' is wound up in both the chase and anticipation.
 
2012-04-09 07:10:59 PM

Strategeryz0r: thankfully I've convinced her to do this the easy way. We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years, and I have no record of being threatening towards her or abusive in any way. Whereas I have her, on a text message, threatening to kill me for no reason. When you can read the prior messages and see I was being more than nice considering what she was saying to me. I just want to split our crap, split the money, and go our separate ways. Not to mention the house is leased in my name, and I intend to file my 30 days with the property manager in the not too distant future so I can move somewhere a bit cheaper and begin rebuilding my life.


I thought the same thing in my divorce, which I started close to this time last year. After 3 1/2 years of marriage, I had her move out and we had agreed to what what was a fair amount (luckily, we didn't have any kids for her to use as leverage). After I filed the initial paperwork, I get a letter from her lawyer saying that she wanted 4x's the amount we agreed to what was fair.

Some 6-months of arbitration, after she pays her lawyer and the taxes, she ended up with a little less than what I initially offered her. Thankfully my lawyer was a family friend, so he was pro-bono. If it wasn't for that, we would have both shelled out a bunch of legal fees almost equaling the awarded amount. Hopefully it'll be simple for you. It wasn't for me.
 
2012-04-09 07:12:46 PM
OK, don't take this the wrong way because I would utterly disappoint wreck her if I could, and she's pretty damn high on my list... but that picture of her laying down in her bra and panties in TFA is photoshopped all to farking hell. That pisses me off because she'd look even more attractive if they hadn't done that. And it's kind of insulting to her to do it too.
 
2012-04-09 07:13:54 PM

MrSteve007: Strategeryz0r: thankfully I've convinced her to do this the easy way. We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years, and I have no record of being threatening towards her or abusive in any way. Whereas I have her, on a text message, threatening to kill me for no reason. When you can read the prior messages and see I was being more than nice considering what she was saying to me. I just want to split our crap, split the money, and go our separate ways. Not to mention the house is leased in my name, and I intend to file my 30 days with the property manager in the not too distant future so I can move somewhere a bit cheaper and begin rebuilding my life.

I thought the same thing in my divorce, which I started close to this time last year. After 3 1/2 years of marriage, I had her move out and we had agreed to what what was a fair amount (luckily, we didn't have any kids for her to use as leverage). After I filed the initial paperwork, I get a letter from her lawyer saying that she wanted 4x's the amount we agreed to what was fair.

Some 6-months of arbitration, after she pays her lawyer and the taxes, she ended up with a little less than what I initially offered her. Thankfully my lawyer was a family friend, so he was pro-bono. If it wasn't for that, we would have both shelled out a bunch of legal fees almost equaling the awarded amount. Hopefully it'll be simple for you. It wasn't for me.


That's exactly why I wanted it down in writing, and on the level. If she wants what's her's, and wants it quickly/easily, then she has to play ball with me. I'm not being demanding, she's messaged me about questions regarding how to split some things(since I'm not at home) and I haven't argued. All I asked was for the things I had before we were married, she can take whatever she wants out of the rest. No skin off my back, I make more money than her so I can replace it all. I just want this over with.
 
2012-04-09 07:22:52 PM
Does this mean she's still not going to get naked in front of the camera?

I seen enough sexy, show me some naked!
 
2012-04-09 07:26:00 PM
I have some tension in my upper theigh...
 
2012-04-09 07:35:30 PM

mongbiohazard: OK, don't take this the wrong way because I would utterly disappoint wreck her if I could, and she's pretty damn high on my list... but that picture of her laying down in her bra and panties in TFA is photoshopped all to farking hell. That pisses me off because she'd look even more attractive if they hadn't done that. And it's kind of insulting to her to do it too.


I don't mind airbrushing of wrinkles / cellulite, etc.

I like the idealized / glamour shots when done well, whether it's creative lighting and makeup, or after effects.

Her legs do look odd in that pic though, especially from what we commonly see of her here on fark. If they're changing shape and size of things, not just blending the surface, it gets me. Seen worse though, Body part collages from differing shots and such.

That said, it's not as if it's a cover piece, it's article fluff, an ad piece. It's not like it's touted as some pinnacle of womanhood, mother of god! type picture, therefore, imo, doesn't really deserve any outrage.

*shrugs*
 
2012-04-09 07:47:48 PM

Skr: Oh yeah, Hide it all under your magnificent Ghost Whisperer MUUMUU collection *rolls eyes*

[images.starpulse.com image 400x600]




Wow, look at the cankles on that biatch.


As I've said in EVERY JLH thread for 15 years:

Someone call me when she's nude. Until then there's nothing to see.
 
2012-04-09 07:53:23 PM

omeganuepsilon: mongbiohazard: OK, don't take this the wrong way because I would utterly disappoint wreck her if I could, and she's pretty damn high on my list... but that picture of her laying down in her bra and panties in TFA is photoshopped all to farking hell. That pisses me off because she'd look even more attractive if they hadn't done that. And it's kind of insulting to her to do it too.

I don't mind airbrushing of wrinkles / cellulite, etc.

I like the idealized / glamour shots when done well, whether it's creative lighting and makeup, or after effects.

Her legs do look odd in that pic though, especially from what we commonly see of her here on fark. If they're changing shape and size of things, not just blending the surface, it gets me. Seen worse though, Body part collages from differing shots and such.

That said, it's not as if it's a cover piece, it's article fluff, an ad piece. It's not like it's touted as some pinnacle of womanhood, mother of god! type picture, therefore, imo, doesn't really deserve any outrage.

*shrugs*



I don't really appreciate the whole "photoshop everyone always" mentality of marketing these days in general. Especially when it comes to pretty ladies. The flaws are part of what make them so beautiful. Turning every picture into a CGI rendering of a succession of nearly identical plastic dolls is boring.
 
2012-04-09 07:54:57 PM
n

madgonad: In the last 24 years the only woman to win best actress at the Oscars that has NOT appeared nude at one time or another in a film is Cher.


What movies did Natalie Portman and Reese Witherspoon get nakey in ???
 
2012-04-09 07:58:37 PM

miss diminutive: sno man: No she's right...

Sexy is about anticipation and mystery, and maybe a little bit of tease.

Which is why I always wear 6 snowsuits to every first date. Gotta drag it out as long as possible.


Not EVERY date has to involve strip poker.
 
2012-04-09 08:02:29 PM

Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas. Not that I would notice if JLH were sitting on my face.


There is no such thing.
 
2012-04-09 08:06:48 PM

HempHead: n madgonad: In the last 24 years the only woman to win best actress at the Oscars that has NOT appeared nude at one time or another in a film is Cher.

What movies did Natalie Portman and Reese Witherspoon get nakey in ???


Reese Witherspoon got naked in Twilight (1998, not the sparkly-vampiry one).

Natalie Portman got naked in Goya's Ghosts and in a short film called Hotel Chevalier.
 
2012-04-09 08:12:35 PM

pushcart: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas. Not that I would notice if JLH were sitting on my face.

There is no such thing.


There are some comments that make me glad I'm on Fark and not on 4chan. Yours is one of them. I can only imagine the flood of images that /b/tards would be filling the thread with right now to prove you wrong.

/shudder
 
2012-04-09 08:13:57 PM

Strategeryz0r: And that means leveraging everything from keeping her from the emergency dental surgery she needs by removing her from my insurance, to using the fact her car is completely under my name to my advantage


Divorces are handled by judges, not juries. I don't think you thought this all the way through.
 
2012-04-09 08:15:16 PM

mongbiohazard: omeganuepsilon: mongbiohazard: OK, don't take this the wrong way because I would utterly disappoint wreck her if I could, and she's pretty damn high on my list... but that picture of her laying down in her bra and panties in TFA is photoshopped all to farking hell. That pisses me off because she'd look even more attractive if they hadn't done that. And it's kind of insulting to her to do it too.

I don't mind airbrushing of wrinkles / cellulite, etc.

I like the idealized / glamour shots when done well, whether it's creative lighting and makeup, or after effects.

Her legs do look odd in that pic though, especially from what we commonly see of her here on fark. If they're changing shape and size of things, not just blending the surface, it gets me. Seen worse though, Body part collages from differing shots and such.

That said, it's not as if it's a cover piece, it's article fluff, an ad piece. It's not like it's touted as some pinnacle of womanhood, mother of god! type picture, therefore, imo, doesn't really deserve any outrage.

*shrugs*


I don't really appreciate the whole "photoshop everyone always" mentality of marketing these days in general. Especially when it comes to pretty ladies. The flaws are part of what make them so beautiful. Turning every picture into a CGI rendering of a succession of nearly identical plastic dolls is boring.


Oh, I agree, the look can easily be done badly, and isn't necessarily a helpful thing as a "go to" treatment for photo's, and certainly isn't tailor'd to personal taste of people who will look close, as we are relatively few.

Altered works, imo, can be more fitting for a "work of art", but I suppose I wasn't addressing what you were saying precisely, it was more of an aside to the topic.

Then again, par imaging for an ad, for a par show, on a sub par network...I don't expect much effort at all to overcome "standard".

As for the standard itself, it is there for a reason, and advertising is not precisely why it is there. They do what works(as a whole mind you, they do have their spectacular failures). Realistic, as a blanket treatment, does not go over as well with the masses as does softened, highlighted, then artificially shadowed, in an idealized manner.
 
2012-04-09 08:17:53 PM

HempHead: n madgonad: In the last 24 years the only woman to win best actress at the Oscars that has NOT appeared nude at one time or another in a film is Cher.

What movies did Natalie Portman and Reese Witherspoon get nakey in ???


Natalie - Hotel Chevalier and Closer
Reese - Twilight (not the sparkly vampire one)
 
2012-04-09 08:22:06 PM

madgonad: Strategeryz0r: And that means leveraging everything from keeping her from the emergency dental surgery she needs by removing her from my insurance, to using the fact her car is completely under my name to my advantage

Divorces are handled by judges, not juries. I don't think you thought this all the way through.


I'm not looking for a jury to take my side man. I'm looking for her to help me do this the easy way. In Idaho you can just split things up between the two of you, and then get a default judgement. Which is what I want. If she wants to take it to court, involve lawyers, and fight it out, then I'm going to strip her of everything I provide her. She can work with me, or against me. Work with me, life gets easier. Work against me, I make life hell. It's her choice.
 
2012-04-09 08:22:35 PM
Woman knows how to rock FM shoes.
 
2012-04-09 08:32:09 PM
In before some asshole posts "that" pic. You know it's coming, it always does.
 
2012-04-09 08:34:24 PM

Your Average Witty Fark User: In before some asshole posts "that" pic. You know it's coming, it always does.


The screencap from the Barbie Basic Workout video when she was 10?
 
2012-04-09 08:41:20 PM

chuckufarlie: Soup4Bonnie: Barry McCackiner: Sexy is spreading eagle with a wide open mouth ready to go.

Ladies must be beating down your door.

to get out?? Yes, I am sure that they are!


i172.photobucket.com
 
2012-04-09 08:47:04 PM
from the last JLH thread...


i515.photobucket.com
 
2012-04-09 09:27:00 PM
I would do a poo on her chest if she asked me to.
 
2012-04-09 09:51:18 PM

Ed Finnerty: I would do a poo on her chest if she asked me to.


Ah, romance.

/You haz it.
 
2012-04-09 09:59:26 PM

Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


No shiat. WTF? Really? REALLY?
 
2012-04-09 10:08:58 PM

keepitcherry: Some guy in this thread really just said his wife was an 11 and that JLH is not that hot. Thanks man, funniest shiat I've read on the internet today.


Any girl that farks me is an 11. My girlfriend is a 15.
 
2012-04-09 10:09:42 PM
Shame on you guys for turning a JLH thread into a discussion about divorce.

/thread needs moar pics or JLH in lingerie
 
2012-04-09 10:12:17 PM

Cosmoboy: keepitcherry: Some guy in this thread really just said his wife was an 11 and that JLH is not that hot. Thanks man, funniest shiat I've read on the internet today.

Any girl that farks me is an 11. My girlfriend is a 15.


She is in my book too.
 
2012-04-09 10:18:19 PM
*of*
 
2012-04-09 10:27:46 PM

cig-mkr: Once you know what's in the package, don't matter how you wrap it.


Alternately, once you know what's inside, it's all about the wrapping.
 
2012-04-09 10:35:15 PM

HotIgneous Intruder: Women just strip off their clothes and jump on the bed for me. Sometimes before dinner is ever over.

/It's a curse...


//then i pay them the $300 and they leave
///ftfy
 
2012-04-09 11:30:10 PM

just_intonation: HempHead: n madgonad: In the last 24 years the only woman to win best actress at the Oscars that has NOT appeared nude at one time or another in a film is Cher.

What movies did Natalie Portman and Reese Witherspoon get nakey in ???

Reese Witherspoon got naked in Twilight (1998, not the sparkly-vampiry one).

Natalie Portman got naked in Goya's Ghosts and in a short film called Hotel Chevalier.


Mrskin.com people
 
2012-04-10 12:21:41 AM

Dr J Zoidberg: Mrskin.com


Thank you!

I have a ......uh......a friend ....yeah that's it. I have a friend who would like to view that site.
 
2012-04-10 12:22:52 AM

Sybarite: I like women who just want to be buck naked as quickly as possible when sex is in the offing. Don't get me wrong, I love a good strip, but it should end in complete nudity.


Agrees:
"Ashley was now wearing only brief white panties. She had signaled her desire by removing her shirt and skirt, and by leaning back on the couch. She closed her eyes, concentrating on nothing but Shannon's tongue and lips. He gently teased her by licking the areas around her most sensitive erogenous zone. Then he slipped her panties down her legs and, within seconds, his tongue was inside her, moving rapidly." - Those Who Trespass by Bill O'Reilly
 
2012-04-10 12:33:42 AM
1.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-04-10 01:55:10 AM
It really is. How many of you have jerked it to sideboob?
 
2012-04-10 02:31:53 AM

cryinoutloud: Believe it or not, there are many women who don't want to show their naked bodies to millions of wanking strangers, no matter how good they look. And they don't really care if you disapprove, either.


Bears repeating. As far as many women are concerned, if they can get through the two or three decades of 'dammit get naked RIGHT NOW' and reach the point in their lives where people no longer constantly demand to see them naked, they win. It is not to their advantage to provide five minutes of masturbation material, because after those five minutes, they are reduced as human beings and you will simply be on to the next woman you demand to see naked. There's absolutely nothing in it for them, and 'I'd give her the most disappointing X minutes of her life' isn't exactly worth their while.

Appearing in Playboy is not the pinnacle of feminine ambition, no matter how much you demand it to be.
 
2012-04-10 02:43:08 AM

Gosling: cryinoutloud: Believe it or not, there are many women who don't want to show their naked bodies to millions of wanking strangers, no matter how good they look. And they don't really care if you disapprove, either.

Bears repeating. As far as many women are concerned, if they can get through the two or three decades of 'dammit get naked RIGHT NOW' and reach the point in their lives where people no longer constantly demand to see them naked, they win. It is not to their advantage to provide five minutes of masturbation material, because after those five minutes, they are reduced as human beings and you will simply be on to the next woman you demand to see naked. There's absolutely nothing in it for them, and 'I'd give her the most disappointing X minutes of her life' isn't exactly worth their while.

Appearing in Playboy is not the pinnacle of feminine ambition, no matter how much you demand it to be.


Yet most of the women you're talking about still pose for photos where they're practically naked, i.e. covering boobs with hands or a blanket. You're saying by showing everything but a nipple they maintain some kind of dignity? Wow, nipples really are special.
 
2012-04-10 03:19:28 AM

browntimmy: Wow, nipples really are special.


Yes, they are.
 
2012-04-10 03:45:30 AM
Everyone has two nipples, how special can they be?

/everyone is precious and unique, as are the other 7,000,000,000 people on this planet.
 
2012-04-10 08:38:56 AM
I'd pee in her butt.
 
2012-04-10 08:50:37 AM
She's right.

I tend to spend my Summery days either at Wreck or Kits beach here in Vancouver. Wreck is a nude beach and Kits is not. Nekkid people on a beach aren't particularly sexy. Skin at the beach just makes sense. That noted, watching women in super sexy bikinis and the like on Kits beach is a real treat much more so than the nudes at Wreck.

Maybe that's just me.
 
2012-04-10 09:51:12 AM

cryinoutloud: advex101: You usually hear that from women when they start to show the effects of gravity.

Believe it or not, there are many women who don't want to show their naked bodies to millions of wanking strangers, no matter how good they look. And they don't really care if you disapprove, either.


This is unacceptable. She exists only to pleasure me. Strip her naked and bring her to my chambers.

/And bring a video camera so all can see.
 
2012-04-10 10:21:02 AM

I May Be Crazy But...: cig-mkr: Once you know what's in the package, don't matter how you wrap it.

Alternately, once you know what's inside, it's all about the wrapping.


But as everyone knows, it's all pink inside.
 
2012-04-10 03:14:54 PM

browntimmy: Yet most of the women you're talking about still pose for photos where they're practically naked, i.e. covering boobs with hands or a blanket. You're saying by showing everything but a nipple they maintain some kind of dignity? Wow, nipples really are special.


I never said anything of the sort. There are some who don't even get their picture taken in so much as a bikini.
 
Displayed 180 of 180 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report