If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Jennifer Love Hewitt: 'It's sexier not to show everything'. Millions of Farkers obviously not consulted   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 180
    More: Fail, Easter, old saying, nude, Jennifer Love Hewitt, wardrobe  
•       •       •

10376 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 09 Apr 2012 at 11:44 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



180 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-04-09 04:00:11 PM
I like the part where her boobs.
 
2012-04-09 04:02:37 PM
I do reserve the right to say - Tits or GTFO

/my wife understands
 
2012-04-09 04:10:24 PM
Maybe I just missed her super heyday but I've never really gotten the huge adoration for her.

She's attractive, but not 11/10 like everyone seems to think. She's just kinda average hot?
 
2012-04-09 04:12:32 PM
Clothed or naked, I'd wreck that.
 
2012-04-09 04:26:14 PM

kroonermanblack: Maybe I just missed her super heyday but I've never really gotten the huge adoration for her.

She's attractive, but not 11/10 like everyone seems to think. She's just kinda average hot?



She is attractive
i39.tinypic.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
Here's the huge adoration
i41.tinypic.com
 
2012-04-09 04:27:29 PM

hinten:

[images2.fanpop.com image 640x960]
[images2.fanpop.com image 586x1100]


Only reinforces my assertion that...

i457.photobucket.com
 
2012-04-09 04:32:25 PM
I think sexy has a lot more to do with setting than what the person is wearing or not wearing. If I were at a seminar on network security and the woman giving the presentation was completely nude talking about windows server 2010 I wouldn't find her very sexy. Now a woman could be wearing a suit and dancing or talking seductively and I would find that very sexy. When we are talking about an actor though playing a part in a sexual scene if she doesn't become nude it is not very sexy, because it just looks un-natural due to the fact that women don't wear a bra during sex or have the sheets pulled up to their necks.
 
2012-04-09 04:37:03 PM

Profedius: I think sexy has a lot more to do with setting than what the person is wearing or not wearing. If I were at a seminar on network security and the woman giving the presentation was completely nude talking about windows server 2010 I wouldn't find her very sexy. Now a woman could be wearing a suit and dancing or talking seductively and I would find that very sexy. When we are talking about an actor though playing a part in a sexual scene if she doesn't become nude it is not very sexy, because it just looks un-natural due to the fact that women don't wear a bra during sex or have the sheets pulled up to their necks.


Are you suggesting that naked women conversing about active directory structures or the latest advances in windows server tech don't give you the weirdest boner???

Because the thought of that gives me the weirdest boner.
 
2012-04-09 04:46:58 PM
She's right, at least for me.

Hiding just the right amount kicks the imagination into overdrive. I'm not going to kick a naked woman out of my bed mind you, but the fantasies the brain can generate when given just enough to set it into motion do more to arouse and generate desire than nakedness.

For instance, a woman in just a button down shirt is far sexier than just plain old nakedness. "Is she wearing panties?" is just one of the million questions racing through your brain.
 
2012-04-09 04:48:11 PM
Drawing the line: Jennifer Love Hewitt says she would have refused her role on The Client List if it required her to go nude

icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-04-09 04:54:36 PM

meat0918: She's right, at least for me.

Hiding just the right amount kicks the imagination into overdrive. I'm not going to kick a naked woman out of my bed mind you, but the fantasies the brain can generate when given just enough to set it into motion do more to arouse and generate desire than nakedness.

For instance, a woman in just a button down shirt is far sexier than just plain old nakedness. "Is she wearing panties?" is just one of the million questions racing through your brain.


A good looking woman in a mostly unbuttoned button down shirt, and a good pair of panties(no granny panties.. ugh), is the hottest thing ever. Having that shirt drape over here covering up just enough to let your imagination run wile. You just wanna rip that shirt off her and go to town because its soooo hot.

/Flat chested women need not apply. Sorry you need tatas to pull that look off.
 
2012-04-09 04:56:28 PM
She's not completely wrong, sometimes. The problem is that a lot of the random paparazzi candids show proof that even if we got what we wanted, there'd be a ton of airbrushing nowadays on her body, given that she hasn't kept it in absolute impossible perfection like it was when she was doing the I Know What You Did Last Summer's.

She could've had the world if she had done it at least ten years ago. But she didn't, and we'll all be left wondering "what if."
 
2012-04-09 05:02:43 PM

Strategeryz0r: meat0918: She's right, at least for me.

Hiding just the right amount kicks the imagination into overdrive. I'm not going to kick a naked woman out of my bed mind you, but the fantasies the brain can generate when given just enough to set it into motion do more to arouse and generate desire than nakedness.

For instance, a woman in just a button down shirt is far sexier than just plain old nakedness. "Is she wearing panties?" is just one of the million questions racing through your brain.

A good looking woman in a mostly unbuttoned button down shirt, and a good pair of panties(no granny panties.. ugh), is the hottest thing ever. Having that shirt drape over her covering up just enough to let your imagination run wild. You just wanna rip that shirt off her and go to town because its soooo hot.

/Flat chested women need not apply. Sorry you need tatas to pull that look off.


Holy shiat I just noticed all the typos. FTFM

/sorry, had a hell of a weekend. And not in a good way.
//been living wherever I can for the last 3 days
///Divorce time :( :(
 
2012-04-09 05:05:30 PM

Strategeryz0r:
/sorry, had a hell of a weekend. And not in a good way.
//been living wherever I can for the last 3 days
///Divorce time :( :(


It's gonna get worse before it gets better, but it does get better.
 
2012-04-09 05:12:55 PM

Rent Party: Strategeryz0r:
/sorry, had a hell of a weekend. And not in a good way.
//been living wherever I can for the last 3 days
///Divorce time :( :(

It's gonna get worse before it gets better, but it does get better.


How much worse can it get? I already had the call the cops on her because she was refusing to let me into my own house to gather some clothes and essentials for me to survive, all the while threatening to shoot me if I tried to get inside.

/serious
//no, really...
 
2012-04-09 05:19:18 PM

Strategeryz0r: Rent Party: Strategeryz0r:
/sorry, had a hell of a weekend. And not in a good way.
//been living wherever I can for the last 3 days
///Divorce time :( :(

It's gonna get worse before it gets better, but it does get better.

How much worse can it get? I already had the call the cops on her because she was refusing to let me into my own house to gather some clothes and essentials for me to survive, all the while threatening to shoot me if I tried to get inside.

/serious
//no, really...


It will get worse when the lawyers get involved, and she tells the judge that she had to do that because you were acting in a threatening manner, and she feels that you're a danger to her and the kids (if there's kids). It will get worse when you end up paying her to live in the house. It will get worse when Bobby the Bad Boy Biker Boyfriend shacks up in your house, that as mentioned, you are paying her to live in. It will get worse when she maxes out all of her credit cards and then insists you pay for them. It will get worse in all kinds of creative ways you can't even imagine yet.

But it will get better. So hang on.
 
2012-04-09 05:23:12 PM

FinFangFark: Apos: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.

[islamwatch2010.files.wordpress.com image 640x407]


Yikes! This is what I imagine Khloe Kardashian's tatas look like.

Surprisingly they aren't THAT big...NSFW


I'd get lead poisoning for that.
 
2012-04-09 05:25:10 PM

Rent Party: Strategeryz0r: Rent Party: Strategeryz0r:
/sorry, had a hell of a weekend. And not in a good way.
//been living wherever I can for the last 3 days
///Divorce time :( :(

It's gonna get worse before it gets better, but it does get better.

How much worse can it get? I already had the call the cops on her because she was refusing to let me into my own house to gather some clothes and essentials for me to survive, all the while threatening to shoot me if I tried to get inside.

/serious
//no, really...

It will get worse when the lawyers get involved, and she tells the judge that she had to do that because you were acting in a threatening manner, and she feels that you're a danger to her and the kids (if there's kids). It will get worse when you end up paying her to live in the house. It will get worse when Bobby the Bad Boy Biker Boyfriend shacks up in your house, that as mentioned, you are paying her to live in. It will get worse when she maxes out all of her credit cards and then insists you pay for them. It will get worse in all kinds of creative ways you can't even imagine yet.

But it will get better. So hang on.


thankfully I've convinced her to do this the easy way. We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years, and I have no record of being threatening towards her or abusive in any way. Whereas I have her, on a text message, threatening to kill me for no reason. When you can read the prior messages and see I was being more than nice considering what she was saying to me. I just want to split our crap, split the money, and go our separate ways. Not to mention the house is leased in my name, and I intend to file my 30 days with the property manager in the not too distant future so I can move somewhere a bit cheaper and begin rebuilding my life.

Thanks for the kind words though, really. Sleeping on the floor of my office last night kind of gave me a new perspective on things. And I'm sure a half dozen new back problems...
 
2012-04-09 05:31:04 PM
Some guy in this thread really just said his wife was an 11 and that JLH is not that hot. Thanks man, funniest shiat I've read on the internet today.
 
2012-04-09 05:32:06 PM

Strategeryz0r: How much worse can it get?


A rough few days isn't so bad compared to, say, getting 3/4 of your wages garnished for kids(not even touching alimony) that are well over 18, and not even living with her...gets you thrown in jail for not paying "back" payments(IE the ruling just happened, and you don't have 18grand laying around).

I'm single and childless, but I've seem some pretty horrid shiat that some women can and will pull because they can work up the tears in front of a judge or some other official.

Of course, my example came from a divorcing couple where she worked in an office that deals with such things, so she had judges and lawyers and child services more or less in her pocket from the get go.

Much of it can get fixed later on, if you find a competent lawyer, may have to move quite a distance away though. The unfortunate guy above had to move out of the state entirely, and then hire a lawyer there.
 
2012-04-09 05:41:24 PM
I agree. Leaving something on makes you want to jump her so you can take it off, then bite her. Naked is fine, but leaving something on teases you and makes you want it more.
 
2012-04-09 05:42:32 PM

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: [mujer.orange.es image 450x724]

[www.sineljefe.com image 480x716]

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 640x942]


Holy crap Ghost Whisperer made it to 100 episodes.
 
2012-04-09 05:42:57 PM

omeganuepsilon: A rough few days isn't so bad compared to, say, getting 3/4 of your wages garnished for kids(not even touching alimony) that are well over 18, and not even living with her...gets you thrown in jail for not paying "back" payments(IE the ruling just happened, and you don't have 18grand laying around).


You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.
 
2012-04-09 05:43:46 PM

Strategeryz0r:
thankfully I've convinced her to do this the easy way. We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years, and I have no record of being threatening towards her or abusive in any way. Whereas I have her, on a text message, threatening to kill me for no reason. When you can read the prior messages and see I was being more than nice considering what she was saying to me. I just want to split our crap, split the money, and go our separate ways. Not to mention the house is leased in my name, and I intend to file my 30 days with the property manager in the not too distant future so I can move somewhere a bit cheaper and begin rebuilding my life.

Thanks for the kind words though, really. Sleeping on the floor of my office last night kind of gave me a new perspective on things. And I'm sure a half dozen new back problems...


I slept in my car while she was off in Vegas. Good times!

Anyway, never, ever, count on the reasonableness of the courts or what you think the evidence will show. You're in a good position in that you don't own the house and you don't have any kids, but that doesn't mean the judge is going to be all reasonable and fair.

If there are any assets at all involved, lawyer up, because she will.
 
2012-04-09 05:46:34 PM

madgonad: omeganuepsilon: A rough few days isn't so bad compared to, say, getting 3/4 of your wages garnished for kids(not even touching alimony) that are well over 18, and not even living with her...gets you thrown in jail for not paying "back" payments(IE the ruling just happened, and you don't have 18grand laying around).

You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.


Theoretically, anyway.

I pay over $1200 a month in child support and another $500 on top of that for maintenance, which she's been getting for the last seven years. I took that to court four years ago and the judge told me TFB, "I'm not going too remove it from this mother at this time..."

You know, because she was heading to Vegas the next week to spend it, but whatever....

Oh yeah, that's in addition to the ~$800 I'm averaging a month for child care, which happens in her house.
 
2012-04-09 05:47:14 PM

Rent Party: Strategeryz0r:
thankfully I've convinced her to do this the easy way. We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years, and I have no record of being threatening towards her or abusive in any way. Whereas I have her, on a text message, threatening to kill me for no reason. When you can read the prior messages and see I was being more than nice considering what she was saying to me. I just want to split our crap, split the money, and go our separate ways. Not to mention the house is leased in my name, and I intend to file my 30 days with the property manager in the not too distant future so I can move somewhere a bit cheaper and begin rebuilding my life.

Thanks for the kind words though, really. Sleeping on the floor of my office last night kind of gave me a new perspective on things. And I'm sure a half dozen new back problems...

I slept in my car while she was off in Vegas. Good times!

Anyway, never, ever, count on the reasonableness of the courts or what you think the evidence will show. You're in a good position in that you don't own the house and you don't have any kids, but that doesn't mean the judge is going to be all reasonable and fair.

If there are any assets at all involved, lawyer up, because she will.


Actually, if it wasn't for how farkin cold it is outside still(Idaho.. ugh I hate our weather), I would love to be sleeping in my car over the floor of my office. BMW seats are magical when you can't get a real bed.

Yea, she wants her half of the money soon. I told her if she takes me to court she wont see one red cent from me until a judge orders it. So if she wants anything from me, she's playing ball. And that includes forfeiting her rights(in writing, and witnessed) to take me to court. I want to settle this outside, amicably. The easy way. If she wants her equal share without contest, then she needs to work with me to accomplish that. Otherwise I will make her life a living hell.
 
2012-04-09 05:55:23 PM

SmellsLikePoo: FinFangFark: Apos: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Sybarite: Kurmudgeon: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas.

This does not compute. There are actually guys who'll turn down a girl if the area around her nipple is not to their specifications?
/paging studman


I have to admit, it freaked me out the one time I encountered hairy aureolas on a girl. I still hit it, but I did not call her again. Funny thing was, her legs and pits were shaven and her bush was either neatly trimmed or just naturally sparse.

[islamwatch2010.files.wordpress.com image 640x407]


Yikes! This is what I imagine Khloe Kardashian's tatas look like.

Surprisingly they aren't THAT big...NSFW

I'd get lead poisoning for that.


Except the fact that that is Kim, not Chewwie.
 
2012-04-09 05:55:59 PM
I don't know about all of this "leave something to the imagination" stuff. I can imagine some pretty nasty things, but unless you are doing them to me then I might as well jerk off. Sexy is spreading eagle with a wide open mouth ready to go.
 
2012-04-09 06:02:02 PM

madgonad: You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.


Yeah...gonna go with your experience is either grossly limited or you're actually white-knighting family court. I've had direct experience with several cases where the mother was awarded both child support AND maintenance where the father had custody of the child, and the mother had visitation. I've also seen mothers awarded over 75% of the fathers income to the point where it was literally impossible for the father to make enough to support himself while paying for support, even though he had split custody. The second case he just quit working and let them garnish his unemployment while he fought the decision. For almost 2 years. The mother, in that particular case, had a record for drug abuse, and the children were on record as having witnessed her abusing drugs, and the court STILL upheld the decision.

Family court is pretty farking messed up.
 
2012-04-09 06:08:04 PM

Barry McCackiner: Sexy is spreading eagle with a wide open mouth ready to go.


Ladies must be beating down your door.
 
2012-04-09 06:08:13 PM

kasmel: madgonad: You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.

Yeah...gonna go with your experience is either grossly limited or you're actually white-knighting family court. I've had direct experience with several cases where the mother was awarded both child support AND maintenance where the father had custody of the child, and the mother had visitation. I've also seen mothers awarded over 75% of the fathers income to the point where it was literally impossible for the father to make enough to support himself while paying for support, even though he had split custody. The second case he just quit working and let them garnish his unemployment while he fought the decision. For almost 2 years. The mother, in that particular case, had a record for drug abuse, and the children were on record as having witnessed her abusing drugs, and the court STILL upheld the decision.

Family court is pretty farking messed up.


Yea, especially in Idaho. This place is a total mommy/wife state. Thats why I'm doing everything I can to convince her to keep this out of the courts, and to keep lawyers from getting involved.

Despite the fact that the job she has is the same job she had before we met(that she was supporting herself just fine with), the fact that I have no record of being abusive towards her in any capacity, and even with a text message from her clearly threatening my life for trying to get into my own house(with 0 justification for that kind of threat).... They would probably still award her some form of spousal support because that's just how one-sided our courts here are.

So, sadly, I have to play hardball to try and keep it out of there. And that means leveraging everything from keeping her from the emergency dental surgery she needs by removing her from my insurance, to using the fact her car is completely under my name to my advantage. I could royally mess up her life if I wanted to, but I don't. I want to make this easy, so I extended the olive branch of work with me and I'll make this easy on both of us. Make this difficult, and you have no clue what you're getting yourself into.
 
2012-04-09 06:30:44 PM

Soup4Bonnie: Barry McCackiner: Sexy is spreading eagle with a wide open mouth ready to go.

Ladies must be beating down your door.


to get out?? Yes, I am sure that they are!
 
2012-04-09 06:44:47 PM

Strategeryz0r: kasmel: madgonad: You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.

Yeah...gonna go with your experience is either grossly limited or you're actually white-knighting family court. I've had direct experience with several cases where the mother was awarded both child support AND maintenance where the father had custody of the child, and the mother had visitation. I've also seen mothers awarded over 75% of the fathers income to the point where it was literally impossible for the father to make enough to support himself while paying for support, even though he had split custody. The second case he just quit working and let them garnish his unemployment while he fought the decision. For almost 2 years. The mother, in that particular case, had a record for drug abuse, and the children were on record as having witnessed her abusing drugs, and the court STILL upheld the decision.

Family court is pretty farking messed up.

Yea, especially in Idaho. This place is a total mommy/wife state. Thats why I'm doing everything I can to convince her to keep this out of the courts, and to keep lawyers from getting involved.

Despite the fact that the job she has is the same job she had before we met(that she was supporting herself just fine with), the fact that I have no record of being abusive towards her in any capacity, and even with a text message from her clearly threatening my life for trying to get into my own house(with 0 justificat ...


You are lucky as hell you don't have kids is all I'm gonna say. I have a co-worker who got divorced 2 years ago and they have 2 kids. She held a loaded gun on him, and she got busted for that, 2 DUI's within 3 months of each other, and had the kids temporarily taken away from her for 6 months when she got so drunk the kids couldn't wake her and the eldest (9 years old at the time) called 911. Despite this, Social Services recommended she retain primary custody after she finished her counseling and my co worker gets the kids 3 weekends a month, has to pay her about 40% of each paycheck in child support, and has to pay for health insurance for the kids. The system is so freaking biased against men in some areas it's ridiculous.
 
2012-04-09 06:46:50 PM

kasmel: madgonad: You also don't know what in the hell you are talking about.

Child support follows State basic formulas and if you have true 50/50 time there frequently isn't any. It will never, ever, no matter how many kids you have with different women go much over 50%. Usually it is several hundred dollars a month for custodial parents on middle class income. Alimony (it is called Maintenance now) it fairly rare and is usually only awarded when one spouse has taken the roll of homemaker for an extended period of time and requires time to rebuild skills. It is also generally short term, a couple years at most.

Yeah...gonna go with your experience is either grossly limited or you're actually white-knighting family court. I've had direct experience with several cases where the mother was awarded both child support AND maintenance where the father had custody of the child, and the mother had visitation. I've also seen mothers awarded over 75% of the fathers income to the point where it was literally impossible for the father to make enough to support himself while paying for support, even though he had split custody. The second case he just quit working and let them garnish his unemployment while he fought the decision. For almost 2 years. The mother, in that particular case, had a record for drug abuse, and the children were on record as having witnessed her abusing drugs, and the court STILL upheld the decision.

Family court is pretty farking messed up.


This. The extremes can be bad(I never implied it always was, but that it can be), despite all the legalese supposedly limiting it, it does happen, and all too often.

A smart lawyer, and/or crooked/extremely biased judge, and you ARE going to get people who get majorly screwed no matter what they do unless they've got tons of money to throw at excellent top shelf lawyers(and even then...).

Sad state of affairs, but we're gaining ground...well, it's an ongoing battle.... You can still see how a lynch mob is right around the corner for society though, look at the whole Zimmerman thing going on.

Strategeryz0r: We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years


That's a good deal, kids almost always make proceedings worse. Wish you the best of luck.
 
2012-04-09 06:59:30 PM
As I get older, I realize that a lot of 'sexy' is wound up in both the chase and anticipation.
 
2012-04-09 07:10:59 PM

Strategeryz0r: thankfully I've convinced her to do this the easy way. We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years, and I have no record of being threatening towards her or abusive in any way. Whereas I have her, on a text message, threatening to kill me for no reason. When you can read the prior messages and see I was being more than nice considering what she was saying to me. I just want to split our crap, split the money, and go our separate ways. Not to mention the house is leased in my name, and I intend to file my 30 days with the property manager in the not too distant future so I can move somewhere a bit cheaper and begin rebuilding my life.


I thought the same thing in my divorce, which I started close to this time last year. After 3 1/2 years of marriage, I had her move out and we had agreed to what what was a fair amount (luckily, we didn't have any kids for her to use as leverage). After I filed the initial paperwork, I get a letter from her lawyer saying that she wanted 4x's the amount we agreed to what was fair.

Some 6-months of arbitration, after she pays her lawyer and the taxes, she ended up with a little less than what I initially offered her. Thankfully my lawyer was a family friend, so he was pro-bono. If it wasn't for that, we would have both shelled out a bunch of legal fees almost equaling the awarded amount. Hopefully it'll be simple for you. It wasn't for me.
 
2012-04-09 07:12:46 PM
OK, don't take this the wrong way because I would utterly disappoint wreck her if I could, and she's pretty damn high on my list... but that picture of her laying down in her bra and panties in TFA is photoshopped all to farking hell. That pisses me off because she'd look even more attractive if they hadn't done that. And it's kind of insulting to her to do it too.
 
2012-04-09 07:13:54 PM

MrSteve007: Strategeryz0r: thankfully I've convinced her to do this the easy way. We have no kids, we've only been together for 2 and a half years, and I have no record of being threatening towards her or abusive in any way. Whereas I have her, on a text message, threatening to kill me for no reason. When you can read the prior messages and see I was being more than nice considering what she was saying to me. I just want to split our crap, split the money, and go our separate ways. Not to mention the house is leased in my name, and I intend to file my 30 days with the property manager in the not too distant future so I can move somewhere a bit cheaper and begin rebuilding my life.

I thought the same thing in my divorce, which I started close to this time last year. After 3 1/2 years of marriage, I had her move out and we had agreed to what what was a fair amount (luckily, we didn't have any kids for her to use as leverage). After I filed the initial paperwork, I get a letter from her lawyer saying that she wanted 4x's the amount we agreed to what was fair.

Some 6-months of arbitration, after she pays her lawyer and the taxes, she ended up with a little less than what I initially offered her. Thankfully my lawyer was a family friend, so he was pro-bono. If it wasn't for that, we would have both shelled out a bunch of legal fees almost equaling the awarded amount. Hopefully it'll be simple for you. It wasn't for me.


That's exactly why I wanted it down in writing, and on the level. If she wants what's her's, and wants it quickly/easily, then she has to play ball with me. I'm not being demanding, she's messaged me about questions regarding how to split some things(since I'm not at home) and I haven't argued. All I asked was for the things I had before we were married, she can take whatever she wants out of the rest. No skin off my back, I make more money than her so I can replace it all. I just want this over with.
 
2012-04-09 07:22:52 PM
Does this mean she's still not going to get naked in front of the camera?

I seen enough sexy, show me some naked!
 
2012-04-09 07:26:00 PM
I have some tension in my upper theigh...
 
2012-04-09 07:35:30 PM

mongbiohazard: OK, don't take this the wrong way because I would utterly disappoint wreck her if I could, and she's pretty damn high on my list... but that picture of her laying down in her bra and panties in TFA is photoshopped all to farking hell. That pisses me off because she'd look even more attractive if they hadn't done that. And it's kind of insulting to her to do it too.


I don't mind airbrushing of wrinkles / cellulite, etc.

I like the idealized / glamour shots when done well, whether it's creative lighting and makeup, or after effects.

Her legs do look odd in that pic though, especially from what we commonly see of her here on fark. If they're changing shape and size of things, not just blending the surface, it gets me. Seen worse though, Body part collages from differing shots and such.

That said, it's not as if it's a cover piece, it's article fluff, an ad piece. It's not like it's touted as some pinnacle of womanhood, mother of god! type picture, therefore, imo, doesn't really deserve any outrage.

*shrugs*
 
2012-04-09 07:47:48 PM

Skr: Oh yeah, Hide it all under your magnificent Ghost Whisperer MUUMUU collection *rolls eyes*

[images.starpulse.com image 400x600]




Wow, look at the cankles on that biatch.


As I've said in EVERY JLH thread for 15 years:

Someone call me when she's nude. Until then there's nothing to see.
 
2012-04-09 07:53:23 PM

omeganuepsilon: mongbiohazard: OK, don't take this the wrong way because I would utterly disappoint wreck her if I could, and she's pretty damn high on my list... but that picture of her laying down in her bra and panties in TFA is photoshopped all to farking hell. That pisses me off because she'd look even more attractive if they hadn't done that. And it's kind of insulting to her to do it too.

I don't mind airbrushing of wrinkles / cellulite, etc.

I like the idealized / glamour shots when done well, whether it's creative lighting and makeup, or after effects.

Her legs do look odd in that pic though, especially from what we commonly see of her here on fark. If they're changing shape and size of things, not just blending the surface, it gets me. Seen worse though, Body part collages from differing shots and such.

That said, it's not as if it's a cover piece, it's article fluff, an ad piece. It's not like it's touted as some pinnacle of womanhood, mother of god! type picture, therefore, imo, doesn't really deserve any outrage.

*shrugs*



I don't really appreciate the whole "photoshop everyone always" mentality of marketing these days in general. Especially when it comes to pretty ladies. The flaws are part of what make them so beautiful. Turning every picture into a CGI rendering of a succession of nearly identical plastic dolls is boring.
 
2012-04-09 07:54:57 PM
n

madgonad: In the last 24 years the only woman to win best actress at the Oscars that has NOT appeared nude at one time or another in a film is Cher.


What movies did Natalie Portman and Reese Witherspoon get nakey in ???
 
2012-04-09 07:58:37 PM

miss diminutive: sno man: No she's right...

Sexy is about anticipation and mystery, and maybe a little bit of tease.

Which is why I always wear 6 snowsuits to every first date. Gotta drag it out as long as possible.


Not EVERY date has to involve strip poker.
 
2012-04-09 08:02:29 PM

Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas. Not that I would notice if JLH were sitting on my face.


There is no such thing.
 
2012-04-09 08:06:48 PM

HempHead: n madgonad: In the last 24 years the only woman to win best actress at the Oscars that has NOT appeared nude at one time or another in a film is Cher.

What movies did Natalie Portman and Reese Witherspoon get nakey in ???


Reese Witherspoon got naked in Twilight (1998, not the sparkly-vampiry one).

Natalie Portman got naked in Goya's Ghosts and in a short film called Hotel Chevalier.
 
2012-04-09 08:12:35 PM

pushcart: Sgygus: Some women have ugly areolas. Not that I would notice if JLH were sitting on my face.

There is no such thing.


There are some comments that make me glad I'm on Fark and not on 4chan. Yours is one of them. I can only imagine the flood of images that /b/tards would be filling the thread with right now to prove you wrong.

/shudder
 
2012-04-09 08:13:57 PM

Strategeryz0r: And that means leveraging everything from keeping her from the emergency dental surgery she needs by removing her from my insurance, to using the fact her car is completely under my name to my advantage


Divorces are handled by judges, not juries. I don't think you thought this all the way through.
 
2012-04-09 08:15:16 PM

mongbiohazard: omeganuepsilon: mongbiohazard: OK, don't take this the wrong way because I would utterly disappoint wreck her if I could, and she's pretty damn high on my list... but that picture of her laying down in her bra and panties in TFA is photoshopped all to farking hell. That pisses me off because she'd look even more attractive if they hadn't done that. And it's kind of insulting to her to do it too.

I don't mind airbrushing of wrinkles / cellulite, etc.

I like the idealized / glamour shots when done well, whether it's creative lighting and makeup, or after effects.

Her legs do look odd in that pic though, especially from what we commonly see of her here on fark. If they're changing shape and size of things, not just blending the surface, it gets me. Seen worse though, Body part collages from differing shots and such.

That said, it's not as if it's a cover piece, it's article fluff, an ad piece. It's not like it's touted as some pinnacle of womanhood, mother of god! type picture, therefore, imo, doesn't really deserve any outrage.

*shrugs*


I don't really appreciate the whole "photoshop everyone always" mentality of marketing these days in general. Especially when it comes to pretty ladies. The flaws are part of what make them so beautiful. Turning every picture into a CGI rendering of a succession of nearly identical plastic dolls is boring.


Oh, I agree, the look can easily be done badly, and isn't necessarily a helpful thing as a "go to" treatment for photo's, and certainly isn't tailor'd to personal taste of people who will look close, as we are relatively few.

Altered works, imo, can be more fitting for a "work of art", but I suppose I wasn't addressing what you were saying precisely, it was more of an aside to the topic.

Then again, par imaging for an ad, for a par show, on a sub par network...I don't expect much effort at all to overcome "standard".

As for the standard itself, it is there for a reason, and advertising is not precisely why it is there. They do what works(as a whole mind you, they do have their spectacular failures). Realistic, as a blanket treatment, does not go over as well with the masses as does softened, highlighted, then artificially shadowed, in an idealized manner.
 
Displayed 50 of 180 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report