Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Wired)   Astronomical amount of astronomical data expected from astronomical radio telescope. Astronomical   ( wired.com) divider line
    More: Cool, radio telescopes, IBM Research, Radio Astronomy, bytes, ska, savannas, electron microscopes, optical microscope  
•       •       •

821 clicks; posted to Geek » on 03 Apr 2012 at 12:52 PM (5 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



14 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2012-04-03 10:53:40 AM  
Headline is gold.
 
2012-04-03 12:07:44 PM  
So it's big?
 
2012-04-03 12:54:18 PM  
First image from the telescope:
media.screened.comView Full Size
 
2012-04-03 12:59:12 PM  
2.bp.blogspot.comView Full Size


am I doin' it right?
 
2012-04-03 01:14:38 PM  
Has Wired always had horrible scientific writing? That article hurt my head.

/I know you like to write out 1 quintillion, but it makes you look stupid
 
2012-04-03 01:33:16 PM  
DNRTFA, but this is already a huge problem. Existing radio telescope arrays are capable of generating (and do generate) hundreds of GB in a few hours, and the problem is only going to get worse.

That said, I have absolutely zero confidence that SKA is actually going to be built. It's almost certainly a pipe-dream.


/ currently looking at one of the fabled-hundreds-of-GB-of-data-observations.
 
2012-04-03 01:45:11 PM  
Also, now that i've read the article, that picture's caption is entirely wrong. It's not sensitivity to radio frequencies, it's a map indicating sensitivity to certain size scales on the sky. Interferometers basically work by being able to detect structure on various scales on the sky and reconstructing images based on theat information. So, an astronomical object that's a point (like a radio-star) has structure on all spatial scales while a huge galaxy has structure on a variety of spatial scales. This sensitivity is, however, based on the array geometry.
 
2012-04-03 04:48:22 PM  
When they install it across Southern Africa, it will provide a fine source of stolen scrap metal for a wide range of people, and therefore stimulate local economies. Unfortunately it will never be in a state to do any astronomy whatsoever.
 
2012-04-03 07:15:47 PM  
thefamouspeople.comView Full Size


Good to see they still think like me.

\Billions
 
2012-04-03 10:48:18 PM  
SKA SKA SKA (new window)
 
2012-04-04 12:38:40 AM  
Everything Counts.

Archive it all, no purging
 
2012-04-04 12:40:33 AM  
Fark! That could be a fun data mining/scientific intelligence project.
 
2012-04-04 01:43:16 AM  

germ78: SKA SKA SKA (new window)


i0.kym-cdn.comView Full Size


\seriously, WTF?
 
2012-04-04 08:50:07 AM  
subby said astronomical twice twice.
 
Displayed 14 of 14 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report