If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post)   Enhanced video evidence in Trayvon Martin case   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 720
    More: Interesting, police videos, George Zimmerman, United States Department of Justice  
•       •       •

20325 clicks; posted to Main » on 02 Apr 2012 at 6:41 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



720 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-04-03 12:24:10 AM

ThrobblefootSpectre: gimmegimme: Why do you care about a petty argument?

Same reason as you I suppose, since now you are involving yourself in same said argument.

Next.


Okay, but at least I'm not trying to distort reality to make racially charged points and imply that the unarmed victim of a ridiculous shooting deserved it.

I can sleep tonight. Can you?
 
2012-04-03 12:26:49 AM
Lots of people jumping to conclusions on both sides of the fence. Lots of loaded words (stalked, hunted). Lots of regurgitating of things that aren't facts. Not a lot of actual knowledge.

1. Zimmerman observed Martin
2. Zimmerman called 911 and was told they "didn't need him" to follow Martin
3. Zimmerman got out of his vehicle
4. Martin was aware Zimmerman was following him
5. A confrontation took place
6. Zimmerman shot and killed Martin

Those are the only facts that are known for certain. The experts on voice analysis? Google bite analysis experts. Experts often don't know shiat from shinola.

Eyewitnesses (on either side) are not dependable. Anyone that sees something (or sees part of it, or hears it) that is as bad as what happened can't always process what they saw. I've seen this first hand as a witness to a car accident I was in stated that they knew for certain what happened, which wasn't even close and not physically possible.

There are other facts that exist, but they haven't been released to the public. Until that information is released why doesn't everyone take a deep breath and not try to characterize or demonize either the victim or Zimmerman until the facts are clear (or as clear as they're going to get.)

Zimmerman is guilty of using poor judgement, but as of yet no one knows if he actually broke any laws.

Martin didn't deserve what happened to him, and what did happen is a tragedy. Mob mentality and vigilantism might be responsible for what happened originally, don't double the unnecessary body count until some truth is known.
 
2012-04-03 12:26:57 AM

Dr. Mojo PhD: ThrobblefootSpectre: Dr. Mojo PhD: OH NOES HYPERBOLE AND THE MIDDLE FINGER WHILE BEING BLACK!


Once again, as before, you use an irrelevant strawman to sidestep the point being made.

The comment was not about the middle finger.

Nah, actually, I spoke directly the point being made. I ridiculed it, because it deserved ridicule, but I spoke directly to it. We can test this. Let's compare your idiot claim for retards against reality. Check it out:

ThrobblefootSpectre: he comment was not about the middle finger. It was about the fact that the media censored and cleaned up Trayvon's image, even going to the extent of using misleading photos, to portray a wholesome childlike appearance.

Is that the point he was trying to make? I wonder if he gave any indication of how he felt Trayvon's image reflected on him:

OnlyM3: Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Oh look at that he did. A value judgment based on his appearance! Gee, wonder why you couldn't even bring yourself to quote that portion of my response, you farking freak, cause it's right there:

Dr. Mojo PhD: OnlyM3: Good riddance to bad rubbish.

GOOD THING HE'S DEAD! HE GAVE THE FINGER TO THE CAMERA AND POSTURED ON THE INTERBUTTS! DEATH SENTENCES FOR ALL!

It's almost like your pathetic freak waste-of-skin ass is trying to -- what was it? -- ThrobblefootSpectre: use an irrelevant strawman to sidestep the point being made.

Ah. That's it. In short, you're a farking pathetic coward to useless and too stupid to address your opponents on the issue. You want to take strawman? Strawman is inventing a position for OnlyM3 to take when his own explicit position is totally contrary to the one you made up for him. Strawman is playing contextomy and quote mining games with my response to make it appear that he didn't make a value judgment based on Trayvon's appearance so you could rail on that for a while.

You're farking pathetic. You're weak, you lack intellectual curiosity, and your entire arguments revolve around fallacies. You ...


Hey, I'm sure he's a tough guy. As long as he has a machine gun. And the other guy is unarmed. And walking down the street holding Skittles. And talking on the phone wondering why he's being followed.
 
2012-04-03 12:28:31 AM

mjbok: Lots of people jumping to conclusions on both sides of the fence. Lots of loaded words (stalked, hunted). Lots of regurgitating of things that aren't facts. Not a lot of actual knowledge.

1. Zimmerman observed Martin
2. Zimmerman called 911 and was told they "didn't need him" to follow Martin
3. Zimmerman got out of his vehicle
4. Martin was aware Zimmerman was following him
5. A confrontation took place
6. Zimmerman shot and killed Martin

Those are the only facts that are known for certain. The experts on voice analysis? Google bite analysis experts. Experts often don't know shiat from shinola.

Eyewitnesses (on either side) are not dependable. Anyone that sees something (or sees part of it, or hears it) that is as bad as what happened can't always process what they saw. I've seen this first hand as a witness to a car accident I was in stated that they knew for certain what happened, which wasn't even close and not physically possible.

There are other facts that exist, but they haven't been released to the public. Until that information is released why doesn't everyone take a deep breath and not try to characterize or demonize either the victim or Zimmerman until the facts are clear (or as clear as they're going to get.)

Zimmerman is guilty of using poor judgement, but as of yet no one knows if he actually broke any laws.

Martin didn't deserve what happened to him, and what did happen is a tragedy. Mob mentality and vigilantism might be responsible for what happened originally, don't double the unnecessary body count until some truth is known.


Like the majority, I simply want Zimmerman arrested and sent through the criminal justice system for the events of that night. Has he been arrested yet?
 
2012-04-03 12:29:53 AM

porterm: just leaving these here for your perusal.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/the_knockout_game_racial_viole n ce_and_the_conspicuous_silence_of_the_media.html

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/12/24/police-aim-to-crack-down-on-viol e nt-new-trend-knock-out/

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/knockout-game-case-shocked-s t -louis-then-fell-apart/article_cdf5032a-b65e-51e0-a84e-de0f0ce0c5f8.ht ml

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078484/Knockout-King-The-sic k ening-game-claiming-lives-country.html


And what does this "knockout game" have to do with Martin or Zimmerman? Or do you just like to come into random threads and post non sequiturs?
 
2012-04-03 12:33:00 AM

Kome: Do you have anything from a website that isn't dedicated to sensationalist fiction? I have trouble getting absorbed into a narrative that is on the same caliber as Twilight, and those links you "provided" (seriously, what's with the spaces in the URLs? Is that a Fark formatting thing now?) all come from organizations that thrive more on fantasy than WoW players.


It's been a Fark thing for a while. I don't know why Fark inserts random spaces into long strings, but it does. Maybe it's a formatting thing.
 
2012-04-03 12:33:01 AM

gimmegimme: Okay, but at least I'm not trying to distort reality to make racially charged points and imply that the unarmed victim of a ridiculous shooting deserved it.


Neither have I. I don't think anyone in the situation "deserved it"

.

gimmegimme: I can sleep tonight. Can you?



At least I don't make false racially charged accusations on fark. So I will probably sleep better than you.
 
2012-04-03 12:33:28 AM

ciberido: And what does this "knockout game" have to do with Martin or Zimmerman? Or do you just like to come into random threads and post non sequiturs?


Well see black people did something bad once and we focused media scrutiny on it and tried to arrest as many people as we could, so what he's saying is that when something bad happens to a black person totally unrelated to those black people, we should let it because that's justice and only white people are victims of racism.

Cue ThrobblefootSpectre to tell us what he "really" meant any second now...
 
2012-04-03 12:37:53 AM

ThrobblefootSpectre: gimmegimme: Okay, but at least I'm not trying to distort reality to make racially charged points and imply that the unarmed victim of a ridiculous shooting deserved it.

Neither have I. I don't think anyone in the situation "deserved it"

.
gimmegimme: I can sleep tonight. Can you?


At least I don't make false racially charged accusations on fark. So I will probably sleep better than you.


Sigh... why don't you re-read your posts and watch a couple episodes of A Different World and read Black Like Me and listen to a N.W.A album? Then you might realize you are projecting.
 
2012-04-03 12:38:34 AM
gimmegimme

Btw - Out of curiosity - How in the wildest stretch of fevered imagination do my observations about media censorship and blatantly false reporting get interpreted by you as "racially charged points and imply that the unarmed victim of a ridiculous shooting deserved it."?

That is more than a quantum leap. We need a new phrase for such mind boggling jumps.
 
2012-04-03 12:40:18 AM

ThrobblefootSpectre: gimmegimme

Btw - Out of curiosity - How in the wildest stretch of fevered imagination do my observations about media censorship and blatantly false reporting get interpreted by you as "racially charged points and imply that the unarmed victim of a ridiculous shooting deserved it."?

That is more than a quantum leap. We need a new phrase for such mind boggling jumps.


Read Dr. Mojo's point. Then report back. I'll be on for another 20 minutes or so.
 
2012-04-03 12:41:01 AM

gimmegimme: Like the majority, I simply want Zimmerman arrested and sent through the criminal justice system for the events of that night. Has he been arrested yet?


Two things:

1. I don't believe that is what the majority wants.
2. It hasn't been determined if he committed a crime. If his version of events adds up with the evidence the police has he didn't commit a crime. Once again, a tragedy, but that doesn't mean he broke the law.

Plus you did state that you were completely certain that he is guilty, which implies he doesn't need to go through the system, he just needs to be punished.
 
2012-04-03 12:41:41 AM

ThrobblefootSpectre: How in the wildest stretch of fevered imagination do my observations about media censorship and blatantly false reporting get interpreted by you as "racially charged points and imply that the unarmed victim of a ridiculous shooting deserved it."?


Better yet, how do you take somebody saying:

OnlyM3: Good riddance to bad rubbish.


And claim that it's... what's the line now? "Observations about media censorship and blatant false reporting".

And to answer the question about why the get interpreted by us as "imply[ing] that the unarmed victim of a ridiculous shooting deserved it," it's probably because you rushed to defend a person that said Trayvon was "bad rubbish" and his death was "good riddance" by claiming he was trying to make a poignant observation about false reporting.

You know, that might have something to do with it.
 
2012-04-03 12:42:04 AM

ciberido: Kome: Do you have anything from a website that isn't dedicated to sensationalist fiction? I have trouble getting absorbed into a narrative that is on the same caliber as Twilight, and those links you "provided" (seriously, what's with the spaces in the URLs? Is that a Fark formatting thing now?) all come from organizations that thrive more on fantasy than WoW players.

It's been a Fark thing for a while. I don't know why Fark inserts random spaces into long strings, but it does. Maybe it's a formatting thing.


I've noticed it does that if you don't use the link thingy on the field submission. Hell I think it's borked my formatted link a few times too
 
2012-04-03 12:44:11 AM

mjbok: gimmegimme: Like the majority, I simply want Zimmerman arrested and sent through the criminal justice system for the events of that night. Has he been arrested yet?

Two things:

1. I don't believe that is what the majority wants.
2. It hasn't been determined if he committed a crime. If his version of events adds up with the evidence the police has he didn't commit a crime. Once again, a tragedy, but that doesn't mean he broke the law.

Plus you did state that you were completely certain that he is guilty, which implies he doesn't need to go through the system, he just needs to be punished.


You make a wonderful point. Gimmegimme is not an agent of the law. Nor is he a part of the criminal justice system in the least. Why don't you want Zimmerman to face a jury of his peers?
 
2012-04-03 12:47:01 AM

gimmegimme: Read Dr. Mojo's point.


His "point" is as misdirected a nonsequitur as yours is. He and you keep trying to claim I am advocating shooting unarmed people or something. Which is irrational, as usual. Any rational person can read my posts and see they are about media bias, plain and simple. The posts are right above for anyone to read.

here's an exmaple of what you and he are doing...

gimmegimme: Your posts show that you are a Nazi sympathiser, and you kill jewish babies. It is clear from what you have said. And it's true. Because i say so.

See? See how much sense that makes.
 
2012-04-03 12:47:40 AM

mjbok: Lots of people jumping to conclusions on both sides of the fence. Lots of loaded words (stalked, hunted). Lots of regurgitating of things that aren't facts. Not a lot of actual knowledge.

1. Zimmerman observed Martin
2. Zimmerman called 911 and was told they "didn't need him" to follow Martin
3. Zimmerman got out of his vehicle
4. Martin was aware Zimmerman was following him
5. A confrontation took place
6. Zimmerman shot and killed Martin

Those are the only facts that are known for certain. The experts on voice analysis? Google bite analysis experts. Experts often don't know shiat from shinola.

Eyewitnesses (on either side) are not dependable. Anyone that sees something (or sees part of it, or hears it) that is as bad as what happened can't always process what they saw. I've seen this first hand as a witness to a car accident I was in stated that they knew for certain what happened, which wasn't even close and not physically possible.

There are other facts that exist, but they haven't been released to the public. Until that information is released why doesn't everyone take a deep breath and not try to characterize or demonize either the victim or Zimmerman until the facts are clear (or as clear as they're going to get.)

Zimmerman is guilty of using poor judgement, but as of yet no one knows if he actually broke any laws.

Martin didn't deserve what happened to him, and what did happen is a tragedy. Mob mentality and vigilantism might be responsible for what happened originally, don't double the unnecessary body count until some truth is known.


Considering that Z is raising an affirmative defense to murder, I don't see why ~any~ reasonable person would have let him go home that night... FFS, it's freaking mind-boggling. That's where the madness lies.
 
HBK
2012-04-03 12:48:31 AM

BMFPitt: sendbillmoney: cleek: arrest the farker. make him prove his side of the story. it's the least he can do, given that he killed a kid after chasing him through the neighborhood for no goddamn reason at all.

Burden of proof, how does it farking work?

He's making an affirmative defense, the burden is on him to prove his actions were justified. As long as you asked.


Not in Florida. (new window)

"In Florida, once self-defense becomes an issue at trial, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense -- a heavy burden."
 
2012-04-03 12:49:52 AM

gimmegimme: Why don't you want Zimmerman to face a jury of his peers?


For what? If it's determined that a crime was committed, then yes. The funny thing is you say that you want him to go through the criminal justice system, which he did. Granted the way he went through was lacking, but he did go through the system and the Weeners was he can't/won't be charged. It's like when a girl says they want you to tell them the truth, they don't. They want what they want to be the truth to be what you say (see: do I look fat in these jeans). You want Zimmerman to go through the justice system to your liking, not to the determination of others.

Once the information the cops have uncovered is released then I will have an educated response to whether or not he should be tried by a jury of his peers. Until that information is released NO ONE has enough information to say if he should be arrested or not.
 
2012-04-03 12:50:06 AM

ThrobblefootSpectre: His "point" is as misdirected a nonsequitur as yours is. He and you keep trying to claim I am advocating shooting unarmed people or something. Which is irrational, as usual. Any rational person can read my posts and see they are about media bias, plain and simple. The posts are right above for anyone to read.


OnlyM3: You are correct that that image was incorrectly reported as this thug

This one however is correct:
cdn2.dailycaller.com

Where he advises someone to commit murder:
dailycaller.com

Good riddance to bad rubbish.


ThrobblefootSpectre: Dr. Mojo PhD: OnlyM3: This one however is correct:

OH NOES HYPERBOLE AND THE MIDDLE FINGER WHILE BEING BLACK!

OnlyM3: Good riddance to bad rubbish.

GOOD THING HE'S DEAD! HE GAVE THE FINGER TO THE CAMERA AND POSTURED ON THE INTERBUTTS! DEATH SENTENCES FOR ALL!

Once again, as before, you use an irrelevant strawman to sidestep the point being made.

The comment was not about the middle finger. It was about the fact that the media censored and cleaned up Trayvon's image, even going to the extent of using misleading photos, to portray a wholesome childlike appearance.


Yep.
 
2012-04-03 12:54:58 AM
gimmegimme:

Your posts show you obviously hate white-hispanics. You are a vile racist. How do you sleep at night?

/see? I can make accusations out of thin air, just like you have been doing :)
 
2012-04-03 12:55:46 AM

HBK: BMFPitt: sendbillmoney: cleek: arrest the farker. make him prove his side of the story. it's the least he can do, given that he killed a kid after chasing him through the neighborhood for no goddamn reason at all.

Burden of proof, how does it farking work?

He's making an affirmative defense, the burden is on him to prove his actions were justified. As long as you asked.

Not in Florida. (new window)

"In Florida, once self-defense becomes an issue at trial, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense -- a heavy burden."


And before that: "Importantly, a person cannot invoke this provision if he is "engaged in unlawful activity" or "initially provokes the use of force against himself."

AFAIK the second part is the burden that is being placed on Z.
 
2012-04-03 12:57:45 AM

ThrobblefootSpectre: Your posts show you obviously hate white-hispanics. You are a vile racist. How do you sleep at night?


Honest opinion question. If Zimmerman was the victim here (the unarmed one with Skittles) and Whitey McWhiteguy was in the Zimmerman watchdog role would Zimmerman be referred to as a "white hispanic" or would he just be referred to as "hispanic"?
 
2012-04-03 12:58:23 AM

ThrobblefootSpectre: gimmegimme: Read Dr. Mojo's point.

His "point" is as misdirected a nonsequitur as yours is. He and you keep trying to claim I am advocating shooting unarmed people or something. Which is irrational, as usual. Any rational person can read my posts and see they are about media bias, plain and simple. The posts are right above for anyone to read.

here's an exmaple of what you and he are doing...

gimmegimme: Your posts show that you are a Nazi sympathiser, and you kill jewish babies. It is clear from what you have said. And it's true. Because i say so.

See? See how much sense that makes.


You have totally swayed me. If there's an embarrassing or gangsta-looking picture online of a person, he or she deserves to be shot. Good riddens to bad rubbish.

Look at this guy. He better not walk through his neighborhood. If he does, he might get stalked by a private citizen and shot after he is told to go home.

3.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-04-03 01:01:46 AM
yeah? was the cops right eye swollen shut too? looks like he may have been in an confrontation as well.

/ "enhanced" at 2:02
 
2012-04-03 01:05:15 AM
Dr. Mojo PhD:

You are the only other Farker making sense at this moment. Have you noticed that when the high school quarterback is killed during a DUI crash in which he's driving drunk without a license in an unregistered car after dark the wrong way down a busy road, they always use the Olan Mills picture in the one-page tribute in the yearbook?

peasantswithpitchforks.com

I never hear anyone ask for the gangsta picture of those folks. Why are people stuck on the gangsta pictures of Martin?

I just don't understand! What could it be!?!?!?
 
2012-04-03 01:07:41 AM

gimmegimme: Dr. Mojo PhD:

You are the only other Farker making sense at this moment.


But... I haven't even taken my sleep meds yet.... :(
 
2012-04-03 01:09:05 AM

mjbok: Honest opinion question. If Zimmerman was the victim here (the unarmed one with Skittles) and Whitey McWhiteguy was in the Zimmerman watchdog role would Zimmerman be referred to as a "white hispanic" or would he just be referred to as "hispanic"?


Good question. I don't thinnk the media would feel an urgent need to whitey-ize the Hispanic in your scenario. I think it sells more papers, views, and clicks, if he stays just "Hispanic victim". And that is the obvious motivation here. Page-views = money. Rallies = money. And the fringe tin-foil hat elements eat it up.

It is interesting, as far as I can find, the term "white-hispanic" doesn't show up in any google news archive search in any year month or day a single time in history, before this shooting. It appears to be a term coined specifically for the particular bias needed in this situation.
 
2012-04-03 01:09:23 AM
 
2012-04-03 01:09:53 AM

gimmegimme: I just don't understand! What could it be!?!?!?


Hmmmm...

HMMMM...

i.imgur.com

HMMMM...

I'm sure it has nothing to do with why they post irrelevant links about the knockout game either.
 
2012-04-03 01:10:31 AM

gimmegimme: I just don't understand! What could it be!?!?!?


Don't you think there's a middle ground between using a picture of someone throwing up gang signs and a picture that is 3-4 years old? The younger picture is used not because it is accurate, but because it paints a picture of this innocent baby. A 17 year old kid looks quite different than a 14 year old, don't you think? When juxtaposed against a mugshot of a 20 something year old it looks like this old guy beating up a young kid.
 
2012-04-03 01:11:14 AM

Dr. Mojo PhD: ThrobblefootSpectre: Your posts show you obviously hate white-hispanics. You are a vile racist. How do you sleep at night?

/see? I can make accusations out of thin air, just like you have been doing :)

Has gimmegimme rushed to white knight for anybody that persecuted the white racial ethnic hispanic subgroup, and claimed that people cheering their extrajudicial killings are just making a point about media bias?

No? That's not a thing that happened? Then it's not the same thing, freak.


I guess I'll have to reluctantly come out against all extrajudicial killings. I know that's an extremely radical position for some of you folks. No matter what race you are, you shouldn't have to worry about being gunned down by a stalker who has been told to fark off.
 
2012-04-03 01:12:06 AM

bugontherug: Have you listened to the 911 tape with the voice screaming for help? It is haunting. Two independent forensic analyses of the tape concluded it was not Zimmerman's voice. They could not conclusively say it was Trayvon's voice because they did not have a sample of it. But process of elimination isn't hard here.


There's an eyewitness to the screaming:

A man who witnessed part of the altercation contacted authorities.

"The guy on the bottom, who had a red sweater on, was yelling to me, 'Help! Help!' and I told him to stop, and I was calling 911," said the witness, who asked to be identified only by his first name, John.

John said he locked his patio door, ran upstairs and heard at least one gun shot.

"And then, when I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on the top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point."
 
2012-04-03 01:13:00 AM

mjbok: gimmegimme: I just don't understand! What could it be!?!?!?

Don't you think there's a middle ground between using a picture of someone throwing up gang signs and a picture that is 3-4 years old? The younger picture is used not because it is accurate, but because it paints a picture of this innocent baby. A 17 year old kid looks quite different than a 14 year old, don't you think? When juxtaposed against a mugshot of a 20 something year old it looks like this old guy beating up a young kid.


I just hope Zimmerman never meets this baby. She looks like she's up to something:

4.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-04-03 01:14:25 AM
Dr. Mojo PhD

Can you explain why you are so racist against white-hispanics? It's obvious in your posts you are white knighting for the people who want to have him railroaded or even killed.

It's true because of your white knighting posts. And because I say so.
 
2012-04-03 01:14:29 AM

gimmegimme: Like the majority, I simply want Zimmerman arrested and sent through the criminal justice system for the events of that night. Has he been arrested yet?


Yes. Then he was released. The picture of him in the article... he doesn't have his hands behind his back because he's at an art gallery.

"Police took Zimmerman into custody after they arrived. He was questioned and released later that night. He remains free as the Seminole County State Attorney's Office reviews the police investigation and decides whether to files charges. The U.S. Justice Department is also investigating."

i.huffpost.com

That criminal justice system that you want him sent through... he is going through it right now. He just happens to be in the early stages of it where we don't hold people who appear to be innocent based on current evidence. Or did you want him tossed in jail until someone finally finds evidence to the contrary, no matter how long that takes?

Unless you are sitting on some case-breaking info, I would assume that you'll have to take the word of the State Attorney's Office and the U.S. Justice Department at face value when they say they don't have enough to hold him yet. Or have you already determined his verdict?
 
2012-04-03 01:15:55 AM

ElLoco: gimmegimme: Like the majority, I simply want Zimmerman arrested and sent through the criminal justice system for the events of that night. Has he been arrested yet?

Yes. Then he was released. The picture of him in the article... he doesn't have his hands behind his back because he's at an art gallery.

"Police took Zimmerman into custody after they arrived. He was questioned and released later that night. He remains free as the Seminole County State Attorney's Office reviews the police investigation and decides whether to files charges. The U.S. Justice Department is also investigating."

[i.huffpost.com image 260x190]

That criminal justice system that you want him sent through... he is going through it right now. He just happens to be in the early stages of it where we don't hold people who appear to be innocent based on current evidence. Or did you want him tossed in jail until someone finally finds evidence to the contrary, no matter how long that takes?

Unless you are sitting on some case-breaking info, I would assume that you'll have to take the word of the State Attorney's Office and the U.S. Justice Department at face value when they say they don't have enough to hold him yet. Or have you already determined his verdict?


How long did he spend in the hospital for that gaping wound?
 
2012-04-03 01:17:42 AM

gimmegimme: How long did he spend in the hospital for that gaping wound?


And that has what to do with arresting him?
 
2012-04-03 01:20:48 AM

Dr. Mojo PhD: It appears that you're a complete idiot:

CIA World Factbook, United States: note



Heh. Only I said google news search. If I had claimed it was never mentioned on CIA World Factbook, your post would be relevant.

Ooopsie, who's the complete idiot?
 
2012-04-03 01:24:14 AM

ElLoco: gimmegimme: How long did he spend in the hospital for that gaping wound?

And that has what to do with arresting him?


You're not even trying. If Zimmerman were really in some mortal fight (that he initiated) then he would have a wound that would require a doctor's attention. If you have two bloody people, one of them dead, it only makes sense to ask the guy with the gun some serious questions.

Tell you what: Right now, at 1:23 EST, grab your handgun. Drive around your neighborhood. Find someone walking around. Call the cops and tell them you see someone suspicious. Ignore the cops when they tell you to back the fark off. Shoot the unarmed person.

Think you'll get arrested?
 
2012-04-03 01:24:30 AM
Jesus H. Christ does FL go out of its way to hide its rules of criminal procedure.
 
2012-04-03 01:26:23 AM

Alien Robot: bugontherug: Have you listened to the 911 tape with the voice screaming for help? It is haunting. Two independent forensic analyses of the tape concluded it was not Zimmerman's voice. They could not conclusively say it was Trayvon's voice because they did not have a sample of it. But process of elimination isn't hard here.


There's an eyewitness to the screaming:

A man who witnessed part of the altercation contacted authorities.

"The guy on the bottom, who had a red sweater on, was yelling to me, 'Help! Help!' and I told him to stop, and I was calling 911," said the witness, who asked to be identified only by his first name, John.

John said he locked his patio door, ran upstairs and heard at least one gun shot.

"And then, when I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on the top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point."



Well, dang. Doesn't that agree with Zimmerman's story?
 
2012-04-03 01:27:41 AM

ThrobblefootSpectre: Alien Robot: bugontherug: Have you listened to the 911 tape with the voice screaming for help? It is haunting. Two independent forensic analyses of the tape concluded it was not Zimmerman's voice. They could not conclusively say it was Trayvon's voice because they did not have a sample of it. But process of elimination isn't hard here.


There's an eyewitness to the screaming:

A man who witnessed part of the altercation contacted authorities.

"The guy on the bottom, who had a red sweater on, was yelling to me, 'Help! Help!' and I told him to stop, and I was calling 911," said the witness, who asked to be identified only by his first name, John.

John said he locked his patio door, ran upstairs and heard at least one gun shot.

"And then, when I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on the top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point."


Well, dang. Doesn't that agree with Zimmerman's story?


The story in which Martin was standing his ground and lost to the guy with a gun who was stalking him? Respond to Dr. Mojo. He has a doctorate. He can help you.
 
2012-04-03 01:29:02 AM

Dr. Mojo PhD: o I'm not. That's a thing you're making up because you're a pathetic limp-dicked farking loser that got backed into a corner by your own stupid behaviour and are trying to project your farking faults


I'm enjoying this. Honestly, I think the guy backed into the corner is the one repeatedly slinging insults like "pathetic limp-dicked farking loser". The last bastion of the lost argument. :)
 
2012-04-03 01:32:19 AM

gimmegimme: Respond to Dr. Mojo. He has a doctorate. He can help you.


Oooo, a doctorate! You mean the "pathetic limp-dicked farking loser" guy?

He certainly sounds intelligent and mature to me!
 
2012-04-03 01:36:28 AM

Dr. Mojo PhD: Come on, pussy. It's easy money, you farking pathetic biatch.


Have you come up with a rationalization for why you are so racist against white-hispanics? It is obvious from your white-knighting posts.
 
2012-04-03 01:36:52 AM

gimmegimme: ElLoco: gimmegimme: How long did he spend in the hospital for that gaping wound?

And that has what to do with arresting him?

You're not even trying. If Zimmerman were really in some mortal fight (that he initiated) then he would have a wound that would require a doctor's attention. If you have two bloody people, one of them dead, it only makes sense to ask the guy with the gun some serious questions.

Tell you what: Right now, at 1:23 EST, grab your handgun. Drive around your neighborhood. Find someone walking around. Call the cops and tell them you see someone suspicious. Ignore the cops when they tell you to back the fark off. Shoot the unarmed person.

Think you'll get arrested?


In FL you don't have to be in a mortal fight to use deadly force. Google up FL and Stand Your Ground Law.

/why has everyone gone full retard in these threads?
 
2012-04-03 01:39:34 AM

gimmegimme: ElLoco: gimmegimme: How long did he spend in the hospital for that gaping wound?

And that has what to do with arresting him?

You're not even trying. If Zimmerman were really in some mortal fight (that he initiated) then he would have a wound that would require a doctor's attention. If you have two bloody people, one of them dead, it only makes sense to ask the guy with the gun some serious questions.

Tell you what: Right now, at 1:23 EST, grab your handgun. Drive around your neighborhood. Find someone walking around. Call the cops and tell them you see someone suspicious. Ignore the cops when they tell you to back the fark off. Shoot the unarmed person.

Think you'll get arrested?


Yep. Just like Zimmerman was arrested. And if it appears that the unarmed person tried to bash my head against the ground as I managed to put a bullet in them, I would expect to be released after some lengthy questioning.

Look, I'm heading to bed now, but you should know (because I think that you don't)... I don't give a shiat about Zimmerman. In my opinion, he was trying to provoke a confrontation. And succeeded. I'm not trying to support him or that gangsta punk that he nailed. I was just feeling snarky before I hit the sack. In my personal opinion, we should fry Zimmerman's ass up in the chair just because of the stupid jacket he is wearing and if I did my math right, I figure that we're are batting about .500 on offing someone that that was guilty of something. I'm from Texas, and that just isn't a bad average around here.

For what it's worth, though, I don't live in a 'neighborhood.' I won't find anyone walking around. If they are around my house and I put a bullet in them, then they've traveled a very long way to get shot in a place where they had no business. My living situation bears no resemblance to that of Zimmerman and Treyvon, nor would I want it to. That's why I live where I live... so I don't have to deal with the Zimmermans and the Treyvons of the world. Or shoot them.
 
2012-04-03 01:43:17 AM

Dr. Mojo PhD: Come on, pussy. It's easy money, you farking pathetic biatch.



Okay fun time is over.

Doc, from your vile profanity laden posts it sounds like you have been drinking. A lot. Just being honest. Come back in the morning to read what you drunk-posted tonight. You will be embarrassed and humiliated.

I don't expect an apology, because I know from experience you aren't that big a person. But at least try to learn a lesson from this when you sober up.
 
2012-04-03 01:56:20 AM

Dr. Mojo PhD: Huh, here's another example:

[i.imgur.com image 411x158]

In this case, here's USA Today's correction: "Photos published online are routinely cropped for size and adjusted for brightness and sharpness to optimize their appearance. In this case, after sharpening the photo for clarity, the editor brightened a portion of Rice's face, giving her eyes an unnatural appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in keeping with our editorial standards."

Oddly enough, nothing about "enhancing". Hell, cropping? That's removing information. But look at that, they've "heightened" the brightness, so they've "enhanced" it, so it's "better" that Condi looks like a lizard person.


Apophis??
 
Displayed 50 of 720 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report