If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Townhall)   Five uncomfortable truths about liberals   (townhall.com) divider line 582
    More: Obvious, Greg Gutfeld, human equivalent, La Raza, mongers, Farrakhan, New Black Panther Party, Dan Savage, Amanda Marcotte  
•       •       •

10175 clicks; posted to Politics » on 27 Mar 2012 at 10:34 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



582 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-03-27 08:32:54 AM
The title "professional blogger" implies that someone is paying him to do this. I'm assuming it's like when my Grandma used to promise me $5 for every "A" I got on my report card in 4th Grade.
 
2012-03-27 08:36:28 AM
I didn't suddenly decide I was a liberal one day, you fascist bastards declared me one when I didn't agree with you

/YBS
 
2012-03-27 08:37:30 AM
If these "truths" seem uncomfortable, it's probably because they got pulled out of your ass.
 
2012-03-27 08:39:03 AM
1) Most liberals are hateful people.
2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.
4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.


Well there you have it, a well written and thoroughly researched piece that finally shines a much-needed light on the evils of liberalism. I'm thankful to this HTML challenged gentleman for having the courage to speak up.
 
2012-03-27 08:39:42 AM
The most uncomfortable thing about that blog was the lack of closing bold tags. It's second only to ALL CAPS in unreadability.
 
2012-03-27 08:40:28 AM
huuurrrrrrrrduuuurrrrrrrrrrr

well done, admins. you'll get lotsa clicks out of this.
 
2012-03-27 08:40:42 AM
IF I PUT THINGS IN BOLD THAT MAKES THEM TRUE

Nice approval, troll.
 
2012-03-27 08:41:32 AM
"Hi, I'm a trolling douchebag who writes at a fourth grade level!"

media.townhall.com

/bold!
 
2012-03-27 08:42:27 AM
I'm going to be kind and assume this blogger is suffering something akin to a Doppler effect. The speed at which he is traveling towards ignorance distorts his perception of others causing him to think the others are distorted.

The sad thing is that in order to be a conservative he has had to abandon science so there is little hope for his recovery.
 
2012-03-27 08:43:38 AM
Did somebody piss in the admins cornflakes this morning?
 
2012-03-27 08:45:58 AM
FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.
 
2012-03-27 08:46:34 AM
[projector.jpg]
 
2012-03-27 08:46:35 AM
TwoHead: I'm going to be kind and assume this blogger is suffering something akin to a Doppler effect. The speed at which he is traveling towards ignorance distorts his perception of others causing him to think the others are distorted.

The sad thing is that in order to be a conservative he has had to abandon science so there is little hope for his recovery.


Interesting analogy

/I think his mass is increasing, as well
 
2012-03-27 08:47:37 AM
Cythraul: I stopped reading.

That's because you're a hateful liberal, and you hate reading things that are true!
 
2012-03-27 08:48:16 AM
You know, if I were an average republican I would be pissed that the admins green'd this piece of shiat blog.

All it does is make the other side seem more fanatical and stupid.

It's what's wrong with politics today, and admins YOU'RE NOT HELPING


-1
 
2012-03-27 08:48:36 AM
That may well be one of the most useless things I've ever skimmed over. Thanks for nothing.
 
2012-03-27 08:50:19 AM
Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.


I hate that about you.
 
2012-03-27 08:50:44 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: You know, if I were an average republican I would be pissed that the admins green'd this piece of shiat blog.

All it does is make the other side seem more fanatical and stupid.

It's what's wrong with politics today, and admins YOU'RE NOT HELPING


-1


they're not here to help. they're here to generate ad revenue, in which pursuit we are obliging them by commenting and refreshing. :)
 
2012-03-27 08:50:52 AM
Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.


This.
 
2012-03-27 08:51:54 AM
We also emit a chemical that causes religious women to terminate their pregnancies.
 
2012-03-27 08:52:25 AM
Farking retard Hawkins didn't close his bold html tag.
 
2012-03-27 08:53:13 AM
CapnBlues: Mrs.Sharpier: You know, if I were an average republican I would be pissed that the admins green'd this piece of shiat blog.

All it does is make the other side seem more fanatical and stupid.

It's what's wrong with politics today, and admins YOU'RE NOT HELPING


-1

they're not here to help. they're here to generate ad revenue, in which pursuit we are obliging them by commenting and refreshing. :)


Eventually it will reach an equilibrium and people with even a slight modicum of interest to keep posting as a sane person will stop. And then ... bye bye revenue.
 
2012-03-27 08:54:15 AM
Allow me to summarize the logic here:

FTFA: Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred. It's amazing how much we still hear about Nazis and the KKK, even though they're both marginalized, nearly powerless groups of misfits and losers.


Later in TFA: because budding liberal fascists often try to shout them down... ....liberalism and fascism are merely different branches of the same tree.

Once more, with emphasis:

If the Nazi Party or the KKK had tried to come up with a system to keep people hating each other based on skin color, they couldn't have ever created anything as effective as the one liberals have now implemented.

And then the inevitable coop de gracie:

They're hate-filled people who are constantly accusing EVERYONE ELSE of behaving the way they do on a daily basis.

This has been yet another episode of conservative cognitive dissonance street theatre. We hope you enjoyed it. Good night, and drive safely.
 
2012-03-27 08:54:46 AM
This just in: Kefka from Final Fantasy 6, extreme liberal.
 
2012-03-27 08:54:48 AM
"People who don't even know what tolerance is shouldn't be lecturing everyone else on the subject."

This message sponsored by the Mandatory Vaginal Wand Party.
 
2012-03-27 08:58:06 AM
syrynxx: "People who don't even know what tolerance is shouldn't be lecturing everyone else on the subject."

This message sponsored by the Mandatory Vaginal Wand Party.


Alohomora Clitoritus!
 
2012-03-27 08:59:24 AM
Barfmaker: 1) Most liberals are hateful people.
2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.
4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

Well there you have it, a well written and thoroughly researched piece that finally shines a much-needed light on the evils of liberalism. I'm thankful to this HTML challenged gentleman for having the courage to speak up.


Number 1. It's quite possible I have more hate. I might even take to a blog one day to describe what I don't like about conservatives.

Number 3 is definitely true. Why, I've divorced 6 women who were very ill. Well more than Gingrich.

Number 5? Sure. I can't abide women or gay people having less rights, whereas uber-conservatives such as Santorum are perfectly fine with it.
 
2012-03-27 08:59:32 AM
Jake Havechek: Farking retard Hawkins didn't close his bold html tag.

God hates tags.
 
2012-03-27 08:59:38 AM
I read Adam Smith and I must be stupid because I don't think that's what liberalism is. I think I need to leave this country.
 
2012-03-27 09:00:22 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: CapnBlues: Mrs.Sharpier: You know, if I were an average republican I would be pissed that the admins green'd this piece of shiat blog.

All it does is make the other side seem more fanatical and stupid.

It's what's wrong with politics today, and admins YOU'RE NOT HELPING


-1

they're not here to help. they're here to generate ad revenue, in which pursuit we are obliging them by commenting and refreshing. :)

Eventually it will reach an equilibrium and people with even a slight modicum of interest to keep posting as a sane person will stop. And then ... bye bye revenue.


i actually see fark-lite eventually turning into a huge pile of trolls and casual 1-post-per-day users. Mostly trolls, though. thing is, trolls are prolific and drive traffic. they'll post like crazy, refresh every ten seconds, and they'll all just be dancing with each other. The pure fact of the matter is that trolls boost ad revenue. That's why the mods are so permissive about them.
 
2012-03-27 09:00:27 AM
syrynxx: This message sponsored by the Mandatory Vaginal Wand Party.

You see, you're wrong. It's the liberals that are being intolerant. They being intolerant to the baby.
 
2012-03-27 09:02:38 AM
John Hawkins is a professional blogger who runs Right Wing News

Your "professional" blog sucks.

It would have been more enlightening to ask 5 year old autistic kids what they think of liberalism.
 
2012-03-27 09:03:58 AM
It's like he's seen me naked. What else does this man know about me?
 
2012-03-27 09:04:54 AM
Seems spot on to me.
 
2012-03-27 09:06:28 AM
BillCo: Seems spot on to me.

It would, to you.
 
2012-03-27 09:06:50 AM
i40.tinypic.com
 
2012-03-27 09:07:19 AM
Jake Havechek: BillCo: Seems spot on to me.

It would, to you.


Is this person a troll, or a true believer?
 
2012-03-27 09:07:25 AM
i.imgur.com
 
2012-03-27 09:07:38 AM
I scanned the bold text and assumed this was insanity. Looks like I was right.
 
2012-03-27 09:08:53 AM
unyon: coop de gracie:

Gracie may very well have had a coop, but I think the expression you were looking for is coup de grâce.
 
2012-03-27 09:14:17 AM
The problem isn't just hateful liberals, but liberal bold tags that sneak up on you like a Frank MIller comic and he knew how bad liberals were he was the first who said how much the occupy movement people are stupid and we should all remember that conservatives are virtuous individuals and say "You're movin' with your auntie and uncle in Bel-Air." I whistled for a cab and when it came near The license plate said fresh and it had dice in the mirror If anything I could say that this cab was rare But I thought, "Nah, forget it. Yo home to Bel-Air!" I pulled up to the house about 7 or 8 And I yelled to the cabby yo holmes smell ya later Looked at my kingdom I was finally there To sit on my throne as the prince of Bel-Air.
 
2012-03-27 09:14:17 AM
His facebook photos (new window)

Looks like he uh ... errrr... Likes to have his picture taken with hot chicks
 
2012-03-27 09:16:51 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: His facebook photos (new window)

Looks like he uh ... errrr... Likes to have his picture taken with hot chicks


Gay.
 
2012-03-27 09:18:54 AM
Diogenes: John Hawkins is a professional blogger who runs Right Wing News

Your "professional" blog sucks.

It would have been more enlightening to ask 5 year old autistic kids what they think of liberalism.


As I happen to have a five year old autistic kid in my living room, I asked him what he thinks of mommy's politics (I watch lots of news, take him to rallies and stuff like that, so he's exposed to my political beliefs quite a bit.) "Too much talking" was his response.

Yep, more enlightening than the article.
 
2012-03-27 09:19:20 AM
Marcus Aurelius: Did somebody piss in the admins cornflakes this morning?

Shhhh..... They don't know it yet, but it wasn't pee in their Cheerios.
 
2012-03-27 09:20:45 AM
#1 is accurate. When Osama bin Laden died, I quite literally danced a jig. ObL had morals, a powerful tolerance of the oppression of women and gays, and even had more children than Santorum, proving how he is as pro-life as most Republicans (while being pro-war and endorsing the death penalty).

So, yes, I do, indeed, hate and rejoice at the death of conservatives.
 
2012-03-27 09:22:22 AM
When Mr. BloggyPants sez:

1) Most liberals are hateful people.

What he means is:

When he goes around telling liberals that they are idiots and that they are destroying the country, they say things like "Fark off, asshole!" and "Get the fark out of my face!" These are the actions of hateful people!


When Mr. BloggyPants sez:

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

What he means is:

When a conservative does blatantly racist things, annoying liberals always call attention to it, thus promoting the racism. If the stupid libtards would just ignore the racism, it would magically disappear!


When Mr. BloggyPants sez:

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.

What he means is:

All morals are defined in the bible, and liberals hate the bible! In fact, they probably use it to wipe their ass. This is very immoral!


When Mr. BloggyPants sez:

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.

What he means is:

Nobody knows what the fark these laws contain. Even the lawmakers who sign them don't know what the fark they do. Somehow, this is the liberals fault.


When Mr. BloggyPants sez:

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

What he means is:

Liberals call conservatives out on intolerance. This is in itself intolerance! You're intolerance of my intolerance is very intolerant! In fact, it's twice as intolerant! I can't tolerate that!
 
2012-03-27 09:22:50 AM
"Professional blogger". Jesus H. Christ.
 
2012-03-27 09:25:05 AM
MidnightSkulker: "Too much talking" was his response.

I'd be hard pressed to disagree with him ;-)
 
2012-03-27 09:26:22 AM
Barfmaker: 1) Most liberals are hateful people.
2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.
4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.


talk about projection! that reads like the handbook to the modern republican party.
 
2012-03-27 09:28:01 AM
2.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-03-27 09:28:47 AM
images.mmorpg.com
 
2012-03-27 09:29:03 AM
SilentStrider: Mrs.Sharpier: His facebook photos (new window)

Looks like he uh ... errrr... Likes to have his picture taken with hot chicks

Gay.


Liberace gay.
 
2012-03-27 09:31:08 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: His facebook photos (new window)

Looks like he uh ... errrr... Likes to have his picture taken with hot chicks


Indeed...
fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net
 
2012-03-27 09:31:10 AM
Jake Havechek: SilentStrider: Mrs.Sharpier: His facebook photos (new window)

Looks like he uh ... errrr... Likes to have his picture taken with hot chicks

Gay.

Liberace gay.


Wait, that doesn't make much sense to me. If a gay man likes to have his picture taken with attractive ladies. Who does a straight guy like to be in a picture with? Wouldn't a straight guy like to be around lovely womenz in a photo?
 
2012-03-27 09:33:35 AM
6. Every time I go to Dick's Mine Shaft those big meanies tell me I don't have the body for chaps, and that's hurtful.
 
2012-03-27 09:34:06 AM
Cythraul: Jake Havechek: SilentStrider: Mrs.Sharpier: His facebook photos (new window)

Looks like he uh ... errrr... Likes to have his picture taken with hot chicks

Gay.

Liberace gay.

Wait, that doesn't make much sense to me. If a gay man likes to have his picture taken with attractive ladies. Who does a straight guy like to be in a picture with? Wouldn't a straight guy like to be around lovely womenz in a photo?


Eh ... no gay dudes have gobs of chicks in their photos too.

This ties into his projection issues.

Also, look at him.

Dude is gay. nttawwt of course but this guy is a hypocritical douche
 
2012-03-27 09:35:01 AM
Barfmaker: Well there you have it, a well written and thoroughly researched piece

Oh, it's a piece alright.
 
2012-03-27 09:36:31 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: Cythraul: Jake Havechek: SilentStrider: Mrs.Sharpier: His facebook photos (new window)

Looks like he uh ... errrr... Likes to have his picture taken with hot chicks

Gay.

Liberace gay.

Wait, that doesn't make much sense to me. If a gay man likes to have his picture taken with attractive ladies. Who does a straight guy like to be in a picture with? Wouldn't a straight guy like to be around lovely womenz in a photo?

Eh ... no gay dudes have gobs of chicks in their photos too.

This ties into his projection issues.

Also, look at him.

Dude is gay. nttawwt of course but this guy is a hypocritical douche


*shrug*

My Gaydar doesn't really work via still photo, unless the subject is trying to be obvious. I need to at least hear them talk, but preferably see them in person. Even then, mind you, it isn't a 100% accurate system.

I need to update my Gaydar firmware.
 
2012-03-27 09:36:49 AM
Number four is my favorite.

Conservatives want to destroy the federal government because they're still pissed that it took away their slaves Ayn Rand and Robert Nozick told them that taxes are evil.

Does letting the impoverished and elderly die in the streets strengthen us as a country? Probably not. Do they care? Absolutely not.

Does hollowing out the middle class strengthen us? Definitely not. Do they care that their policies depress wages and exacerbate income disparity? Nope.

Does cutting taxes while we're invading two countries on the other side of the globe do us any good? Who cares? Cutting taxes is a conservative principle!
 
2012-03-27 09:37:21 AM
Townhall makes Breitbart look like The Economist.
 
2012-03-27 09:37:23 AM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: I didn't suddenly decide I was a liberal one day, you fascist bastards declared me one when I didn't agree with you

/YBS


Were you born liberal, or did your namby pamby parents nurture you this way? Probably too much Spongebob Squarepants and not enough Batman as a child. I suggest we send you to a Bible Camp program to discipline your love of all things liberal out of your system. A total detox. Not even one episode of Modern Family allowed.
 
2012-03-27 09:37:46 AM
You mean like...leather daddy?
 
2012-03-27 09:37:59 AM
I thought I read an article yesterday that claimed conservatives understand liberals better than liberals understand conservatives.

It may be anecdotal, but this garbage appears to refute that claim quite profusely.
 
2012-03-27 09:38:53 AM
Barfmaker:
1) Most liberals are hateful people.


Hateful isn't the right word. But we do tend to expect the worst out of people, whereas I've come to realize conservatives expect the best. The problem is that they then try to define what 'the best' is (marriage between 1 man and 1 woman, for instance) and if one doesn't adhere to that ideal, one is hateful.

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

Hoodies not withstanding. C'mon, get real here.

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.

No, we just don't necessarily take to the idea of morality espoused by conservatives. There's a difference. But we have positive values that we try to live by and have a positive effect on society...just like conservatives believe they do as well.

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.

Good thing that the policy of tax cuts, tax cuts, and more tax cuts has led to a fruitful society where everyone is lifted up and the debt is gone and we can fight wars and still have more coming into the government coffers than going out.

Or how about abstinence education..doing a bang up job there knocking out teen pregnancy and reducing abortion.

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

No, we just aren't going to stand by idly and let you try to make everyone conform to your ideal of "the best."

/I've said it before and I'll say it again...conservatives want to grant you the freedom to be just like them
 
2012-03-27 09:39:09 AM
i96.photobucket.com

exhibit A:

that necklace.
 
2012-03-27 09:39:36 AM
I love when they trot out the fact that Fred Phelps calls himself a democrat so that makes him a liberal and therefore all liberals are bigots.
 
2012-03-27 09:40:00 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: [i96.photobucket.com image 640x455]

exhibit A:

that necklace.


Time to play: Which one of these is more attractive?

I'm definitely going for the one on the right.
 
2012-03-27 09:40:52 AM
i96.photobucket.com


got a lil something on your shirt there.
 
2012-03-27 09:41:18 AM
Why is it the "conservatives" without real jobs are the first to cry "no taxes, ever! Infrastructure is theft!"

I'm sure this guy's "badgered the witness" to Red Dawn enough times to believe that when the revolution comes he'll be a one-man "librul" killing machine and be anointed King of New America when the odds are substantially higher that he will end up on the losing end of a hammer fight with Glenn Beck all for the greater amusement of the Duke of New York.
 
2012-03-27 09:41:26 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: [i96.photobucket.com image 480x360]


got a lil something on your shirt there.


It's probably from one of the other two in the photo.
 
2012-03-27 09:42:42 AM
Cythraul: Mrs.Sharpier: [i96.photobucket.com image 640x455]

exhibit A:

that necklace.

Time to play: Which one of these is more attractive?

I'm definitely going for the one on the right.


Grover Norquist ? Ya, he's attractive.

Also, fun fact, he's married to a Palestinian Muslim seekrit terrorist.
 
2012-03-27 09:43:20 AM
rightwingnews.com

I rest my case.
 
2012-03-27 09:44:21 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: [i96.photobucket.com image 640x455]

exhibit A:

that necklace.


John Candy has a brother?
 
2012-03-27 09:44:31 AM
mrshowrules: [rightwingnews.com image 450x340]

I rest my case.


"Pictured: Failed John Madden lookalike poses with discarded Macy's parade float."
 
2012-03-27 09:44:37 AM
mrshowrules: [rightwingnews.com image 450x340]

I rest my case.


Has anyone noticed he has almost the exact same smile in every single photo. People who use staged smiles that like creep me out.
 
2012-03-27 09:47:03 AM
That article is a shining example of accusing your enemy - - LOUDER - - of everything you are guilty of doing.
 
2012-03-27 09:48:52 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: exhibit A:

Whoa my gaydar just went from "eh, maybe" to "PAUL LYNDE"
 
2012-03-27 09:49:36 AM
i96.photobucket.com

how about no
 
2012-03-27 09:51:54 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: [i96.photobucket.com image 397x604]

how about no


Most people that ugly normally compensate with a personality or intelligence. Ugly, stupid and hateful is no way to go through life but yet he seems happy so I'm confused.
 
2012-03-27 09:54:00 AM
'Liberal' just became the face of every wedgie this dingus received in what I'm sure was a very hard adolescence.
 
2012-03-27 09:55:26 AM
Well, from the responses this thread has received, Drew should really mention that FARK is a LIBERAL website on the main page.
 
2012-03-27 09:56:17 AM
Has anyone mentioned closing the bold tag yet? What about the rest of the cramped-feeling CSS?
 
2012-03-27 09:57:21 AM
ferretman: Well, from the responses this thread has received, Drew should really mention that FARK is a LIBERAL website on the main page.

i49.tinypic.com
 
2012-03-27 09:59:33 AM
ferretman: Well, from the responses this thread has received, Drew should really mention that FARK is a LIBERAL website on the main page.

You don't hang out in the politics tab much, do you?
 
2012-03-27 10:00:27 AM
ferretman: Well, from the responses this thread has received, Drew should really mention that FARK is a LIBERAL website on the main page.

I'm sure that plenty of conservatives and Fark Independents will be along shortly to embarrass themselves.
 
2012-03-27 10:01:22 AM
ferretman: Well, from the responses this thread has received, Drew should really mention that FARK is a LIBERAL website on the main page.

You're right. When we condemn and make fun nonsense and stupidity we kinda are targeting conservatives.
 
2012-03-27 10:01:51 AM
One uncomfortable truth about rhetoric: The broader a brush you paint with, the more you dehumanize your enemies and use tactics similar to the Nazis.

I'm sorry, is that a godwin? Too farking bad. When you say all/most liberals or all/most conservatives are "hateful," or "intolerant," or "less moral," you're using the same bullshiat used to persecute the Jews and other groups in the past.
 
2012-03-27 10:03:08 AM
I enjoyed the article. It's hard to argue with the substance of it.
 
2012-03-27 10:04:14 AM
Please stop, elchip. There's enough stupid and crazy here to not have to feed it with this fake stuff anymore.
 
2012-03-27 10:04:15 AM
Article is 100% correct.
 
2012-03-27 10:04:37 AM
Back to the kid.....

I'm not convinced that's his real face. It's got one expression. I think it's a suit like Arnie had in Total Recall.

"How long will you be staying on Mars?"

"Liberals suck."

Ka-boom!
 
2012-03-27 10:04:57 AM
SkinnyHead: It's hard to argue with the substance of it.

Mostly because there is none.
 
2012-03-27 10:04:57 AM
For evidence of my previous statement, see above.
 
2012-03-27 10:05:40 AM
SkinnyHead: I enjoyed the article. It's hard to argue with the substance of it.

Gee, you make such a convincing argument. Are you copying from BillCo's paper?
 
2012-03-27 10:07:16 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: You know, if I were an average republican I would be pissed that the admins green'd this piece of shiat blog.

All it does is make the other side seem more fanatical and stupid.

It's what's wrong with politics today, and admins YOU'RE NOT HELPING


-1


To be fair, the GOP isn't giving the admins anything but derp to work with these days.
 
2012-03-27 10:08:36 AM
Diogenes: SkinnyHead: I enjoyed the article. It's hard to argue with the substance of it.

Gee, you make such a convincing argument. Are you copying from BillCo's paper?


Ulgh. SkinnyHead is a troll. All I ever see him post is troll bullshiat.

Don't feed it, please.
 
2012-03-27 10:10:13 AM
Flab: unyon: coop de gracie:

Gracie may very well have had a coop, but I think the expression you were looking for is coup de grâce.


[thatsthejoke.jpg]

If I wanted to say that, I woulda said coo de graw. :)

I was going to say that us folks in western Canada sometimes go out of our way to bastardize the french language with over-the-top english pronounciations, because it's a fun way to troll our french brothers. then I checked your profile... mission accomplished. :)

par don moy. Je neh sa-vase pass cue voos ate un Kwebec-oise. :)
 
2012-03-27 10:10:43 AM
Cythraul: ferretman: Well, from the responses this thread has received, Drew should really mention that FARK is a LIBERAL website on the main page.

You don't hang out in the politics tab much, do you?


There's way too much trolling and crazy going on in there these days.
 
2012-03-27 10:11:51 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: [i96.photobucket.com image 640x455]

exhibit A:

that necklace.


I can totally see him face down in mancrotch. Just sayin'.
 
2012-03-27 10:17:01 AM
2wolves: Jake Havechek: Farking retard Hawkins didn't close his bold html tag.

God hates tags.


I love you for that.
 
2012-03-27 10:18:12 AM
How do I get a gig as a "Professional blogger?"
 
2012-03-27 10:19:36 AM
what_now: How do I get a gig as a "Professional blogger?"

1. Be Republican

2. Mash keyboard

3. Profit
 
2012-03-27 10:20:21 AM
I_C_Weener: MaudlinMutantMollusk: I didn't suddenly decide I was a liberal one day, you fascist bastards declared me one when I didn't agree with you

/YBS

Were you born liberal, or did your namby pamby parents nurture you this way? Probably too much Spongebob Squarepants and not enough Batman as a child. I suggest we send you to a Bible Camp program to discipline your love of all things liberal out of your system. A total detox. Not even one episode of Modern Family allowed.


I credit Batman for helping me form my liberal leanings from a young age. He's the poster boy for liberal ideals. He spends all his money tying to help those in need and gives up his own health and happiness to do what's right for the downtrodden. Can't get much more liberal than that.
 
2012-03-27 10:20:50 AM
what_now: How do I get a gig as a "Professional blogger?"

You're a dirty liberal, so you can't get a professional blogging job, you know, because you already have a full-time America Hating job.
 
2012-03-27 10:24:24 AM
Article should've been called "five uncomfortable myths about liberals"
 
2012-03-27 10:26:19 AM
www.cybertheater.com
 
2012-03-27 10:28:56 AM
Flab: SkinnyHead: It's hard to argue with the substance of it.

Mostly because there is none.


Oh hello, Flab. The article portrays liberals as hateful and intolerant people with fragile self esteem who talk liberal only so they can look cool in front of others and feel good about themselves. Those are generalizations, of course. Not every liberal can be described that way. But I'll keep an eye on this thread, because I think that most of the comments coming from liberals will confirm the major premise of the article.
 
2012-03-27 10:30:01 AM
ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW! ECW!
 
2012-03-27 10:30:47 AM
Wendy's Chili: what_now: How do I get a gig as a "Professional blogger?"

1. Be Republican

2. Mash keyboard

3. Profit


Can I just pretend? I mean, I could vomit word salad out for Townhall or Stormfront or whatever. Watch:

The truth that the liberal msm mainstream media doesn't want you know is that the liberals have all the words on their side, and they use these words to make you feel bad about yourself. They quote "professors" of "economics" and "history". These are grown men- and even some of those pantsuit wearing Hillary RODHAM Clinton wannabes- who have never had a real job like you or me, they've been "studying".

Well we know that Real Americans don't need fancy education at elitist liberal schools to understand who to spend our own money. Just because we don't understand concepts like "economics" and "international relations" doesn't mean those people are smarter than us. We know what we FEEL, and that's more important than any boos learning in the world.



Pay me.
 
2012-03-27 10:32:51 AM
SkinnyHead: Flab: SkinnyHead: It's hard to argue with the substance of it.

Mostly because there is none.

Oh hello, Flab. The article portrays liberals as hateful and intolerant people with fragile self esteem who talk liberal only so they can look cool in front of others and feel good about themselves. Those are generalizations, of course. Not every liberal can be described that way. But I'll keep an eye on this thread, because I think that most of the comments coming from liberals will confirm the major premise of the article.


As a dirty lib, I just want to say that I love you, Skinnyhead. Your humor and wisdom are the least of your very unique and special qualities. Thank you for bringing so much joy to the politics thread, and not letting us forget what a true conservative is!
 
2012-03-27 10:33:31 AM
SkinnyHead: talk liberal

How does one "talk liberal"?
 
2012-03-27 10:34:56 AM
what_now: Wendy's Chili: what_now: How do I get a gig as a "Professional blogger?"

1. Be Republican

2. Mash keyboard

3. Profit

Can I just pretend? I mean, I could vomit word salad out for Townhall or Stormfront or whatever. Watch:

The truth that the liberal msm mainstream media doesn't want you know is that the liberals have all the words on their side, and they use these words to make you feel bad about yourself. They quote "professors" of "economics" and "history". These are grown men- and even some of those pantsuit wearing Hillary RODHAM Clinton wannabes- who have never had a real job like you or me, they've been "studying".

Well we know that Real Americans don't need fancy education at elitist liberal schools to understand who to spend our own money. Just because we don't understand concepts like "economics" and "international relations" doesn't mean those people are smarter than us. We know what we FEEL, and that's more important than any boos learning in the world.


Pay me.


I'll forward your writing samples to Americans For Prosperity.
 
2012-03-27 10:35:03 AM
History is on their side.
 
2012-03-27 10:37:05 AM
Professional dick flogger.
 
2012-03-27 10:37:23 AM
Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.



Oddly enough, I decided I hated the author at that exact same point. I must be a liberal.
 
2012-03-27 10:38:20 AM
1) Most liberals are hateful people.
2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.


Aren't all of those the same?
 
2012-03-27 10:38:53 AM
Bloody William: Please stop, elchip. There's enough stupid and crazy here to not have to feed it with this fake stuff anymore.

Huh? Did I miss something here?
 
2012-03-27 10:40:57 AM
17. Most liberals are relentlessly punctual
 
2012-03-27 10:41:08 AM
Need coffee, can't type, et cetera.
 
2012-03-27 10:41:16 AM
Five uncomfortable truths about conservatives:

1) Rush Limbaugh
2) Fox News
3) Two wars
4) Worst recession since the Great Depression
5) Butthurt
 
2012-03-27 10:41:24 AM
#6 Many of them own guns and are pro gun
 
2012-03-27 10:41:45 AM
Based on the dialog with "libs" in regards to the Trayvon Martin shooting I would rate this as double plus true infinity.
 
2012-03-27 10:42:18 AM
1) Most liberals are hateful people.

The ones who moved to the infotainment business? No more or less hateful than the ones in the rest of the entertainment industry.

The liberals I know here in New York tend to come from communities where local government was competent, honest, frugal and largely apolitical. The problem happens when they think they can assume the same on a larger scale of state and federal legislators, and forget that power corrupts.

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

See above. The public Al Sharpton.is a performance artist.

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people. You won't see liberals being accused of being hypocritical if it turns out that they don't have "good family values," commit adultery, or don't live up to their Christian beliefs because they don't really buy into any of those things.

Meh, it all evens out. Right-wingers don't get hammered for jet-setting around the world to give enviro-lectures to the little people.

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not. This may seem like an alien concept to a lot of people, but liberals don't push policies based on whether they improve people's lives or not. To the contrary, liberals support policies that make them feel good about themselves

Has the writer ever heard ANY politician say "That idea I had a few years back? Wow, what a stinker. Zero out its budget line already."

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

Disproved by the existence of forums like this one where I can give as good as I get with all you filthy communist hippie liberal farkers. Only rarely am I told to DIAF.
 
2012-03-27 10:42:18 AM
Six uncomfortable truths about the "blogger":

1. He mistakes his opinion for fact
2. He writes for the internet, but has not idea how to use HTML tags
3. That necklace is atrocious
4. Even other conservatives look uncomfortable to be photographed with him
5. He seems unaware of what fascism is.
6. He's scratching out a living preaching to the converted and as messed up as the right wing movement in the US is, the "best before" date is quickly approaching as the elderly die off.
 
2012-03-27 10:42:27 AM
Why are conservative bloggers and policy wonks so doughy and misshapen?

It's almost as if they've been kicked around a lot while younger by tall, athletic(looking), superior liberals and harbor a huge grudge, almost as huge as their jowls.

/Yes, I am full of liberal hate
 
2012-03-27 10:43:01 AM
Wow, are you telling me that liberals and conservatives are the same people? My mind is blown.
 
2012-03-27 10:43:02 AM
ferretman: Well, from the responses this thread has received, Drew should really mention that FARK is a LIBERAL website on the main page.

There are many, many, legitimate criticisms of liberals. These aren't them, because they show a profound lack of understanding of the liberal mindset. Pointing and laughing is the only sensible thing to do in this case.
 
2012-03-27 10:43:58 AM
I think we can put the author into the "men who look like lesbians" category
 
2012-03-27 10:44:34 AM
cameroncrazy1984: SkinnyHead: talk liberal

How does one "talk liberal"?


Talking Liberal involves speaking in complete sentences, citing actual facts, and failing to invoke the blessings of Saint Ronald Reagan.
 
2012-03-27 10:44:53 AM
Look I can use the bold option for text also!

OF COURSE HAD THE AUTHOR USED CAPSLOCK IT WOULD HAVE REALLY GOTTEN THEIR POINT ACROSS!
 
2012-03-27 10:44:54 AM
18.) Milt (sperm) from herring clouds the coastline in this aerial photo from the Sitka Sound herring sac roe fishery in Alaska.
 
2012-03-27 10:45:16 AM
Most liberals are less moral than other people. You won't see liberals being accused of being hypocritical if it turns out that they don't have "good family values," commit adultery, or don't live up to their Christian beliefs because they don't really buy into any of those things. Liberals incessantly attack the church and they seldom talk about morals because if they have no morals, then no one can ever accuse them of being hypocrites. This is also why liberals feel so comfortable lying about conservatives. The standard with liberal blogs, papers, and cable news outlets isn't accuracy; it is doing damage to conservatives. It's considered perfectly acceptable amongst liberals to lie about conservatives, Christians, and anybody else who gets in the way of liberalism. The problem for liberals is that you can't smear and mock people for believing in morals, traditions, and family values while simultaneously credibly claiming to have them yourself.

The conservative leaders of today are full of morals.

Yup, filled up. The High Road is up there, with the conservative leaders of today.
 
2012-03-27 10:45:20 AM
1) Most liberals are "hateful" people.
2) Liberals do more than any other "group" to encourage race-based "hatred".
3) Most liberals are less "moral" than other people.
4) Most liberals don't care if the "policies" they "advocate" work or not.
5) Most liberals are "extremely intolerant".

Fixed.
 
2012-03-27 10:45:45 AM
Jackson Herring: 18.) Milt (sperm) from herring clouds the coastline in this aerial photo from the Sitka Sound herring sac roe fishery in Alaska.

o_O
 
2012-03-27 10:45:48 AM
Truth #1: Liberals are uncomfortable. Not only are there bony projections galore -- tofu burgers provide insufficient padding -- If you accidentally sit on one, be prepared for an elbow in the ribs, or even worse.

In contrast, many conservatives are very comfortable to sit on, and if you are lucky enough to find one on a Wal-Mart scooter, it's just like sitting on a well-worn beanbag chair.
 
2012-03-27 10:46:31 AM
Who are they uncomfortable for? I doubt they are uncomfortable for conservatives, who hate libtards and love anything negative about them. I doubt they are uncomfortable for liberals because they are lies.

The only part of that page's title that's true is "Five"
 
2012-03-27 10:47:01 AM
qorkfiend: Jackson Herring: 18.) Milt (sperm) from herring clouds the coastline in this aerial photo from the Sitka Sound herring sac roe fishery in Alaska.

o_O


Sorry you can't face the uncomfortable truth about liberals...
 
2012-03-27 10:48:50 AM
19.) Liberals have 11 toes
 
2012-03-27 10:49:08 AM
6) 97% of liberals own refrigerators.
 
2012-03-27 10:49:22 AM
Barfmaker: 1) Most liberals are hateful people.
2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.
4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

Well there you have it, a well written and thoroughly researched piece that finally shines a much-needed light on the evils of liberalism. I'm thankful to this HTML challenged gentleman for having the courage to speak up.


memepics.com
 
2012-03-27 10:49:26 AM
adamgreeney: I credit Batman for helping me form my liberal leanings from a young age. He's the poster boy for liberal ideals. He spends all his money tying to help those in need and gives up his own health and happiness to do what's right for the downtrodden. Can't get much more liberal than that.

He does believe quite strongly in the Second Amendment and vigilante justice though...which isn't real liberal. And how did he make that money? Same way Romney did. Think about that...
 
2012-03-27 10:49:36 AM
Well as a hate filled liberal I want to assure the writer that when the stars are properly aligned to raise the city of R'lyeh, he too will find outmoded concepts like morality unnecessary. Psychotic violent episodes, unholy transformations and death may also be something he experiences.
 
2012-03-27 10:50:01 AM
Vodka Zombie: Mrs.Sharpier: His facebook photos (new window)

Looks like he uh ... errrr... Likes to have his picture taken with hot chicks

Indeed...
[faaaaaaabulous Bachmann pic]


Oh my Lord.
 
2012-03-27 10:50:32 AM
Well, what do you know?
A 25 lb. bag of Retard Chow from Townhall!
I'm shocked, I tell you - shocked!
 
2012-03-27 10:50:44 AM
Nah, conservatives aren't even remotely hateful, no siiir

Link (new window)
 
2012-03-27 10:51:01 AM
Amazingly, if you listen to liberals, you'll find that they don't even understand what tolerance is in the first place. Actual tolerance means that you realize people have different practices and views and even if you don't agree, you understand that they should have the ability to live as they choose,

Out of all the other dap, this took the cake.
If conservatives are so tolerant then why are they fighting against gay marriage and women's health care? That's tolerance?

Get outta here.
 
2012-03-27 10:51:15 AM
Jackson Herring: qorkfiend: Jackson Herring: 18.) Milt (sperm) from herring clouds the coastline in this aerial photo from the Sitka Sound herring sac roe fishery in Alaska.

o_O

Sorry you can't face the uncomfortable truth about liberals...


2.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-03-27 10:51:18 AM
Barfmaker: 1) Most liberals are hateful people.
2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.
4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

Well there you have it, a well written and thoroughly researched piece that finally shines a much-needed light on the evils of liberalism. I'm thankful to this HTML challenged gentleman for having the courage to speak up.


Rachel Maddow has been having segments lately talking about how Republicans have been using projection as a political strategy. Where they take exactly the bad things they are doing and claim the (D)'s are doing it. For instance Republicans say Democrats are waging war on women. Yeah, really.

That's what this list reminded me of.
 
2012-03-27 10:51:19 AM
20.) Liberals are incapable of turning right. This is why all NASCAR drivers are secret Dem voters
 
2012-03-27 10:51:39 AM
3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.

If "moral" was a synonym of "sanctimonious", he would have nailed this one.

Aw, hell, I bet he believes they're the same thing. I'll score him 1/5.
 
2012-03-27 10:51:41 AM
Five uncomfortable truths about conservatives:

1) They can't cook. Anything cooked by a conservative ends up burnt and covered in American cheese.
2) They smell like sausages. This is self-explanatory.
3) Whenever at a party, conservatives always end up bullying the stereo playing Under Pressure over and over.
4) They have vestigial tails, which probably comes from their low breeding.
5) When cornered, conservatives will raise the front quarters of their bodies off the ground and flatten their necks in a threatening gesture.
 
2012-03-27 10:51:45 AM
i359.photobucket.com
 
2012-03-27 10:51:48 AM
cameroncrazy1984: SkinnyHead: talk liberal

How does one "talk liberal"?


I'm pretty sure he meant either Ebonics or with a lisp. I don't think Ebonics with a lisp would work, though.
 
2012-03-27 10:51:57 AM
Gergesa: Well as a hate filled liberal I want to assure the writer that when the stars are properly aligned to raise the city of R'lyeh, he too will find outmoded concepts like morality unnecessary. Psychotic violent episodes, unholy transformations and death may also be something he experiences.

Not to mention projectile vomiting, and the growth of unwanted limbs.
 
2012-03-27 10:52:39 AM
I_C_Weener: adamgreeney: I credit Batman for helping me form my liberal leanings from a young age. He's the poster boy for liberal ideals. He spends all his money tying to help those in need and gives up his own health and happiness to do what's right for the downtrodden. Can't get much more liberal than that.

He does believe quite strongly in the Second Amendment and vigilante justice though...which isn't real liberal. And how did he make that money? Same way Romney did. Think about that...


Batman hates guns. And he employs vigilantism because of defects and corruption in the law enforcement and legal systems.
 
2012-03-27 10:52:41 AM
Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...
 
2012-03-27 10:52:42 AM
lennavan: Barfmaker: 1) Most liberals are hateful people.
2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.
4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

Well there you have it, a well written and thoroughly researched piece that finally shines a much-needed light on the evils of liberalism. I'm thankful to this HTML challenged gentleman for having the courage to speak up.

Rachel Maddow has been having segments lately talking about how Republicans have been using projection as a political strategy. Where they take exactly the bad things they are doing and claim the (D)'s are doing it. For instance Republicans say Democrats are waging war on women. Yeah, really.

That's what this list reminded me of.


Obi-Rove has taught them well. When he left them, they were but learners; now they are the masters.
 
2012-03-27 10:52:49 AM
i.imgur.com
 
2012-03-27 10:52:57 AM
Jackson Herring: 19.) Liberals have 11 toes

Hoarders! They are the 1%!
 
2012-03-27 10:54:16 AM
king cranium maximus IV: [i.imgur.com image 400x298]

Good gravy. His neck looks like a snake's after swallowing a large animal.
 
2012-03-27 10:54:57 AM
verydemotivational.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-03-27 10:54:59 AM
Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.


Because you hate the blogger? Score 1 for the blogger.
 
2012-03-27 10:55:14 AM
21.) Liberals don't sleep. They wait. OK I'm pretty much out of ideas now
 
2012-03-27 10:55:42 AM
skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

No, really?
 
2012-03-27 10:55:48 AM
1) Most liberals are hateful people.

Indeed. Liberals are responsible for fighting against equal rights for gays and women.

Oh wait . . .

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred. It's amazing how much we still hear about Nazis and the KKK, even though they're both marginalized, nearly powerless groups of misfits and losers. On the other hand, how marginalized are the hatemongers on the Left?

Agreed. Liberals are always spreading propaganda about how teh skarry mooselimbs will kill us all and how we need to bomb the brown people in the middle east and how those filthy mexicans are crossing the border to take all our jobs

Oh wait . . .

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.

Agreed. Nothing says Christian Morality than condemning two guys to hell because they happen to love each other. And what's more moral than being forced to do good deeds in order to avoid an imaginary punishment?

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not

Agreed. This is why the conservatives push such wonderful plans like the Paul Ryan plan.

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant

Correct. It's the liberals who hate the gays, non-Christians, women, hispanics and the poor.

bestminiprojector.com
 
2012-03-27 10:56:06 AM
I agree with the author, Al Sharpton being on TV every night is an uncomfortable truth.

/shakes tiny fist of rage at liberals
 
2012-03-27 10:56:08 AM
MyRandomName: Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.

Because you hate the blogger? Score 1 for the blogger.


Presumably Cythraul stopped reading because it's stupid nonsense. And I guess you would know all about stupid nonsense given how much of it you post.
 
2012-03-27 10:56:10 AM
What did I just read?
 
2012-03-27 10:57:46 AM
birchman: What did I just read?

Acting out of an idiot I would guess.
 
2012-03-27 10:58:23 AM
This has to be a joke? His first 4 are demonizing and dehumanizing a group of people, then his 5th one is "Most liberals are extremely intolerant. "... Seriously dude?
 
2012-03-27 10:58:25 AM
Whenever a prominent conservative gets sick or dies, there's an orgy of celebratory hatred on the Left. It happened with Reagan, Breitbart and every other big name conservative in between.

Two words for you, Roundboy... Ted Kennedy.
 
2012-03-27 10:58:32 AM
king cranium maximus IV: [i.imgur.com image 400x298]

seriously. that necklace.

god it must stink
 
2012-03-27 10:58:44 AM
skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?
 
2012-03-27 10:58:58 AM
Uncomfortable truth #6: Liberals, Liberals, liberals, liberals, lib, er, als LIBERALS Libs Libs Libs LIBERALS!

/ooga booga
 
2012-03-27 10:59:03 AM
Diogenes: Batman hates guns. And he employs vigilantism because of defects and corruption in the law enforcement and legal systems.

The Second Amendment doesn't say guns does it? And instead of relying on a bigger, better government he does the job himself. Quite boot strappy if you ask me.
 
2012-03-27 10:59:34 AM
Five uncomfortable truths about conservatives...

1) The entire American Conservative platform is an exact contradiction with the teachings of Jesus.

2) They scoff at evolution, yet their ideal utopian civilization on earth is ruled by social Darwinism and the Law of the Jungle.

3) They preach the concept of "American Exceptionalism", yet deride anyone who wishes to extract themselves out of the mire of mediocrity as a "snob" or "elitist".

4) They claim to believe in the sanctity of life, yet are the most blood thirsty and most likely to treat other human beings as disposable.

5) Both times their holy combination of supply side economics and deregulation have been put into practice by a two term Republican President, the end result was a Wall Street crash and a massive government funded bailout of banks.
 
2012-03-27 10:59:36 AM
Headso: This has to be a joke? His first 4 are demonizing and dehumanizing a group of people, then his 5th one is "Most liberals are extremely intolerant. "... Seriously dude?

Which leads to his next article:

6) Liberals have no self-awareness or sense of irony.
 
2012-03-27 10:59:52 AM
I_C_Weener: MaudlinMutantMollusk: I didn't suddenly decide I was a liberal one day, you fascist bastards declared me one when I didn't agree with you

/YBS

Were you born liberal, or did your namby pamby parents nurture you this way? Probably too much Spongebob Squarepants and not enough Batman as a child. I suggest we send you to a Bible Camp program to discipline your love of all things liberal out of your system. A total detox. Not even one episode of Modern Family allowed.


The delirium tremors from Arrested Development withdrawal might kill him. Modern Family would act like a kind of methadone in this case.
 
2012-03-27 10:59:57 AM
DarwiOdrade: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

No, really?


you heard it here first.

/this is what I get for pointing out the obvious
 
2012-03-27 11:00:17 AM
Mrs.Sharpier:
i96.photobucket.com

got a lil something on your shirt there.



Santorum?
 
2012-03-27 11:00:35 AM
lennavan: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?


odd how the way one side generalizes the other turns out to be bad, eh?
 
2012-03-27 11:00:41 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: [i96.photobucket.com image 480x360]


got a lil something on your shirt there.


Holy shiat, this guy reminds me of many of the College Republicans I knew back in the day.

Irrational hatred towards "liberals". check

Inability to define "liberal". check

Sloppy dresser when he tries to "dress up". check

Takes pictures with the "rockstars" of the CR movement. check

Appears to have poor personal hygiene. check

shiat. Takes me back to the 1997 National Convention.
 
2012-03-27 11:00:47 AM
cameroncrazy1984: SkinnyHead: talk liberal

How does one "talk liberal"?


i236.photobucket.com
 
2012-03-27 11:01:30 AM
I_C_Weener: Diogenes: Batman hates guns. And he employs vigilantism because of defects and corruption in the law enforcement and legal systems.

The Second Amendment doesn't say guns does it? And instead of relying on a bigger, better government he does the job himself. Quite boot strappy if you ask me.


Except, of course, that he does his best to work with and within the system and has helped out the Gotham and federal governments on any number of occasions. Your problem is that you think "liberal" and "communist" are the same thing.
 
2012-03-27 11:01:50 AM
Straight from the Karl Rove handbook. Project your weaknesses on your opponent.
 
2012-03-27 11:02:15 AM
I decided to research the first 'claim' I came across. "harassing Michelle Malkin's family until they had to move,"


And this is the bigger story I found.



After nationally syndicated columnist and blogger Michelle Malkin posted the e-mail addresses and phone numbers of three members of Students Against War, they received a flood of obscene and harassing messages from around the country, including death threats. When a liberal Web site, in retaliation, published Malkin's cell phone number and home address, a full-blown blog war ensued. "I am now forced to remove one of my children from school and move my family," Malkin wrote Thursday in an e-mail to the Sentinel.
 
2012-03-27 11:02:48 AM
At long last, we have answers to the most important questions of our time.

22.) Liberals control the British Crown.
23.) Liberals keep the metric system down.
24.) Liberals keep Atlantis off the maps.
25.) Liberals keep the Martians under wraps.
26.) Liberals hold back the electric car.
27.) Liberals made Steve Gutenberg a star.
28.) Liberals rob cave fish of their sight.
29.) Liberals rig every Oscar night.

OK, some of these might actually be accurate.
 
2012-03-27 11:03:15 AM
He looks like John Candy but more like a very gay John Candy, make that a very gay living John Candy.
 
2012-03-27 11:03:39 AM
i44.tinypic.com
 
2012-03-27 11:04:08 AM
I am guessing at least most liberals know how to properly HTML format a blog.
 
2012-03-27 11:04:14 AM
Diogenes: I_C_Weener: adamgreeney: I credit Batman for helping me form my liberal leanings from a young age. He's the poster boy for liberal ideals. He spends all his money tying to help those in need and gives up his own health and happiness to do what's right for the downtrodden. Can't get much more liberal than that.

He does believe quite strongly in the Second Amendment and vigilante justice though...which isn't real liberal. And how did he make that money? Same way Romney did. Think about that...

Batman hates guns. And he employs vigilantism because of defects and corruption in the law enforcement and legal systems.


Bruce Wayne may have inherited his wealth, like a Kennedy, but Wayne Enterprises is a very liberal corporation, which always puts public interest ahead of profit. In fact, Wayne Pharmaceuticals and Wayne Healthcare runs Gotham City's healthcare system.
 
2012-03-27 11:04:31 AM
A Townhall link? Usually makes me skeptical... but maybe this time they won't be completely insa...

*clicks link*

"1) Most liberals are hateful people. "

Oh for goodness sakes!
 
2012-03-27 11:04:57 AM
1) Most liberals conservatives are hateful people.
2) Liberals conservatives do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most liberals conservatives are less moral than other people.
4) Most liberals conservatives don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most liberals conservatives are extremely intolerant.

FTFY
/should I take out "most"?
 
2012-03-27 11:06:01 AM
MindStalker: I decided to research the first 'claim' I came across. "harassing Michelle Malkin's family until they had to move,"


And this is the bigger story I found.



After nationally syndicated columnist and blogger Michelle Malkin posted the e-mail addresses and phone numbers of three members of Students Against War, they received a flood of obscene and harassing messages from around the country, including death threats. When a liberal Web site, in retaliation, published Malkin's cell phone number and home address, a full-blown blog war ensued. "I am now forced to remove one of my children from school and move my family," Malkin wrote Thursday in an e-mail to the Sentinel.


The phrase I use in these situations is "Turn-about is fair play."
 
2012-03-27 11:06:21 AM
OhioUGrad: I am guessing at least most liberals know how to properly HTML format a blog.

Of course we do.
 
2012-03-27 11:06:42 AM
img.photobucket.com

The face of love, morality and tolerance.
 
2012-03-27 11:06:48 AM
This guy writes on a level that is more suited to ignorant farkers who run the zoo than the unfortunate bastards stuck in the cages.
 
2012-03-27 11:06:50 AM
Change the word "liberal" to "people". Now that makes more sense.
 
2012-03-27 11:06:52 AM
Jackson Herring: 21.) Liberals don't sleep. They wait. OK I'm pretty much out of ideas now

22. Liberals play Words with Friends on the tarmac in support of al Queada.

23. Liberals invented the metric system.

24. Liberals gave us AIDS. You don't think conservatives regularly have sex with monkeys do you?

/It's ok. I pretty much spend 24/7 thinking of how liberals want to ruin our country.
 
2012-03-27 11:07:12 AM
I_C_Weener: adamgreeney: I credit Batman for helping me form my liberal leanings from a young age. He's the poster boy for liberal ideals. He spends all his money tying to help those in need and gives up his own health and happiness to do what's right for the downtrodden. Can't get much more liberal than that.

He does believe quite strongly in the Second Amendment and vigilante justice though...which isn't real liberal. And how did he make that money? Same way Romney did. Think about that...


Liberals have no issue with people working and making money. Or with people making tons of money. Bruce Wayne didn't make his money by eviscerating companies and firing thousands. There isn't even a correlation between the two other than "they're rich."

And I don't know any liberals, personally, that object to the second amendment.
 
2012-03-27 11:07:39 AM
qorkfiend: MindStalker: I decided to research the first 'claim' I came across. "harassing Michelle Malkin's family until they had to move,"


And this is the bigger story I found.



After nationally syndicated columnist and blogger Michelle Malkin posted the e-mail addresses and phone numbers of three members of Students Against War, they received a flood of obscene and harassing messages from around the country, including death threats. When a liberal Web site, in retaliation, published Malkin's cell phone number and home address, a full-blown blog war ensued. "I am now forced to remove one of my children from school and move my family," Malkin wrote Thursday in an e-mail to the Sentinel.

The phrase I use in these situations is "Turn-about is fair play."


It's better than the Chicago way. If you pulled that shiat with me and my family, be glad rhetorical quid pro quo is all you get.

Thin-skinned little shiatheads.
 
2012-03-27 11:09:05 AM
InmanRoshi: 1) The entire American Conservative platform is an exact contradiction with the teachings of Jesus.

community.secondlife.com

InmanRoshi: 4) They claim to believe in the sanctity of life, yet are the most blood thirsty and most likely to treat other human beings as disposable.

24.media.tumblr.com
 
2012-03-27 11:09:08 AM
Flab: unyon: coop de gracie:

Gracie may very well have had a coop, but I think the expression you were looking for is coup de grâce.


Pretty sure the expression he was looking for was the Buggs Bunny disfigurement of the French phrase. And he nailed it.
 
2012-03-27 11:09:37 AM
A Dark Evil Omen: I_C_Weener: Diogenes: Batman hates guns. And he employs vigilantism because of defects and corruption in the law enforcement and legal systems.

The Second Amendment doesn't say guns does it? And instead of relying on a bigger, better government he does the job himself. Quite boot strappy if you ask me.

Except, of course, that he does his best to work with and within the system and has helped out the Gotham and federal governments on any number of occasions. Your problem is that you think "liberal" and "communist" are the same thing.


And when he refuses to work with the government, it's because he recognizes the government has been corrupted by the rich and powerful to the detriment of the common people. Have you ever seen Batman even once complain about his tax rate? Or complain about any social service proved by the government to assist the poor? Or refuse to help anyone because they should have known better than to put themselves in a situation where they needed outside help? Never.
 
2012-03-27 11:09:51 AM
1) Liberals do not exist in the United States of America (they only think they do).

/I've discovered, much to my horror, that my political self-identification was mostly wrong for 20 or so years. I'm socially liberal, but a fiscal conservative, pretty much the earmarks of a paleoconservative. Most self-proclaiming liberals in the US and A are actually neoliberals and don't even know it.
 
2012-03-27 11:10:22 AM
dear mr. personal responsibility,
plz go for lots of long walks, eat some salad and see if you can knock out a half-dozen boy pull-ups before labor day.
i.imgur.com
i'm guessing that you will contribute to the increase in health-care costs by the looks of your blubbery neck.
btw, the subtle polo logos are subtle.
 
2012-03-27 11:10:30 AM
I May Be Crazy But...: cameroncrazy1984: SkinnyHead: talk liberal

How does one "talk liberal"?

I'm pretty sure he meant either Ebonics or with a lisp. I don't think Ebonics with a lisp would work, though.


[miketyson.jpg]
 
2012-03-27 11:11:23 AM
what_now: 6) 97% of liberals own refrigerators.

Lies. Most liberals either live with their parents, or 17 to an appartment, where the fridge is owned by the landlord.
 
2012-03-27 11:11:45 AM
FTA: Bill Maher, Barney Frank, Michael Moore, Keith Olbermann, Amanda Marcotte, Ed Schultz, Dan Savage, Ted Rall, Al Sharpton, etc., etc. are some of the most hate-filled people you'll ever run into outside of a maximum security prison.


Yes, I wonder why these people are filled with hate (or at least anger) towards a goodly portion of the electorate. It can't because they've had to deal with having their rights denied, threatened, or taken away over the course of their lifetimes. No, certainly not that.
 
2012-03-27 11:11:54 AM
skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?

odd how the way one side generalizes the other turns out to be bad, eh?


Odd how both sides are always so equivalent, eh?
 
2012-03-27 11:12:11 AM
What the fark did I just read?

Seriously, the drivel, the derp, the wharrgharrblllll is astounding.
 
2012-03-27 11:13:58 AM
The day that SkinnyHead is outed will be akin to the day that skookum was outed.
 
2012-03-27 11:14:26 AM
I_C_Weener: 24. Liberals gave us AIDS. You don't think conservatives regularly have sex with monkeys do you?

Was Clarence Beeks a conservative or a liberal?
 
2012-03-27 11:14:44 AM
lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?

odd how the way one side generalizes the other turns out to be bad, eh?

Odd how both sides are always so equivalent, eh?


I wonder what course of action that would lead one to take.
 
2012-03-27 11:15:19 AM
jso2897: Well, what do you know?
A 25 lb. bag of Retard Chow from Townhall!
I'm shocked, I tell you - shocked!


i798.photobucket.com

/it was the first thing to pop into my head
 
2012-03-27 11:15:21 AM
HotIgneous Intruder: Most self-proclaiming liberals in the US and A are actually neoliberals and don't even know it.

"Neoliberalism supports the privatization of nationalized industries, deregulation, and enhancing the role of the private sector in modern society."

These are all embraced by the modern American conservative and opposed by the modern American liberal.
 
2012-03-27 11:15:53 AM
www.cybertheater.com
www.ixbt.com
bestminiprojector.com
technabob.com
www.fareastgizmos.com
www.textually.org
 
2012-03-27 11:16:05 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: You know, if I were an average republican I would be pissed that the admins green'd this piece of shiat blog.

All it does is make the other side seem more fanatical and stupid.

It's what's wrong with politics today, and admins YOU'RE NOT HELPING


-1


but you clicked the link, right? the admins did their job
 
2012-03-27 11:17:01 AM
A Dark Evil Omen: Your problem is that you think "liberal" and "communist" are the same thing.

?
 
2012-03-27 11:17:17 AM
A Dark Evil Omen: I_C_Weener: Diogenes: Batman hates guns. And he employs vigilantism because of defects and corruption in the law enforcement and legal systems.

The Second Amendment doesn't say guns does it? And instead of relying on a bigger, better government he does the job himself. Quite boot strappy if you ask me.

Except, of course, that he does his best to work with and within the system and has helped out the Gotham and federal governments on any number of occasions. Your problem is that you think "liberal" and "communist" are the same thing.


Speaking of....George Zimmerman is Batman. Hmmm...
 
2012-03-27 11:17:33 AM
MindStalker: I decided to research the first 'claim' I came across. "harassing Michelle Malkin's family until they had to move,"


And this is the bigger story I found.



After nationally syndicated columnist and blogger Michelle Malkin posted the e-mail addresses and phone numbers of three members of Students Against War, they received a flood of obscene and harassing messages from around the country, including death threats. When a liberal Web site, in retaliation, published Malkin's cell phone number and home address, a full-blown blog war ensued. "I am now forced to remove one of my children from school and move my family," Malkin wrote Thursday in an e-mail to the Sentinel.


So actions have consequences? Interesting...
 
2012-03-27 11:17:41 AM
HotIgneous Intruder: Most self-proclaiming liberals in the US and A are actually neoliberals and don't even know it.

Someone needs to learn their ideological labels.

nicholasmead.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-03-27 11:18:11 AM
lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?

odd how the way one side generalizes the other turns out to be bad, eh?

Odd how both sides are always so equivalent, eh?


yeah don't you know, decades of conservatives dehumanizing liberals on the radio, the television and major print and internet publications is equal to some of us saying mean things about "conservatives" on fark.com.
 
2012-03-27 11:18:12 AM
This is the truth, but as usual fark libs can't handle it. Quick, call the whambulance!
 
2012-03-27 11:19:04 AM
I_C_Weener: Speaking of....George Zimmerman is Batman. Hmmm...

1.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-03-27 11:19:36 AM
1) Most liberals are hateful people.
Nope.

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
Yes, and how do you feel about brown people again?

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.
Only when talking about religious morals, but then again, those aren't morals at all. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that the more conservative a person is, the fewer morals that person has. After all, what does it say about a person if he / she has to look up the ten commandments to know that killing and stealing is wrong? Townhall writers don't seem to know the commandment about false witness, by the way.

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
*cough* trickle down *cough*

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.
Yes. We're extremely intolerant of right-wing BS like the stuff we find on Townhall and Fox News.
 
2012-03-27 11:19:54 AM
Flab: I_C_Weener: 24. Liberals gave us AIDS. You don't think conservatives regularly have sex with monkeys do you?

Was Clarence Beeks a conservative or a liberal?


He was a goddamned patriot who was tricked into that situation by some ne'er do wells. A disgraced day trader and a hoodlum...black hoodlum.
 
2012-03-27 11:20:17 AM
why ya'll postin pictures of John Candy in this thread, is he a professional blogger?
 
2012-03-27 11:21:28 AM
Headso: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?

odd how the way one side generalizes the other turns out to be bad, eh?

Odd how both sides are always so equivalent, eh?

yeah don't you know, decades of conservatives dehumanizing liberals on the radio, the television and major print and internet publications is equal to some of us saying mean things about "conservatives" on fark.com.


I certainly know how I will vote!
 
2012-03-27 11:21:55 AM
king cranium maximus IV: Steele & Hawkins

c.cslacker.com
 
2012-03-27 11:23:06 AM
Flab: I_C_Weener: Speaking of....George Zimmerman is Batman. Hmmm...

[1.bp.blogspot.com image 375x500]


:)
 
2012-03-27 11:23:13 AM
I_C_Weener: A disgraced day trader and a hoodlum...black hoodlum.

And a slut.
 
2012-03-27 11:24:02 AM
lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?

odd how the way one side generalizes the other turns out to be bad, eh?

Odd how both sides are always so equivalent, eh?


the generalizations? Ya know, like the ones made in the article? Yeah, they tend to focus on the worst and apply it to all.
 
2012-03-27 11:24:07 AM
Ok, I haven't read the thread or the article yet, but I predict that at least the majority of said "truths" aren't true at all.

Let's see how well I did in my prediction...

1. Most liberals are hateful people.

Wow, I guess I should have guessed that all of the truths are untrue if this is where we are going to start. This is about the exact opposite of reality; it's so wrong it's hard to even argue about.

2. Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

I don't remember liberals aiming firehoses at blacks in the 1960's. However, he does get about a quarter point here in the sense that some African American activists tend to scream first and ask questions later. I'm being generous in my scoring, though.

3. Most liberals are less moral than other people.

They certainly have a different moral viewpoint than conservatives, and that viewpoint tends to have fewer things on the "evil sins" list. But conservatives are more hypocritical in that they have a long list of "sins" and then they tend to break them.

4. Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.

Um, no. His examples are horrible, too. Liberals aren't anti-drilling because of oil prices, they are anti-drilling because they want to protect the enviroment and consider that to be more important than a microscopic dip in the price of gas that ignoring it would be. Vietnam was a no win war; the problem was that we didn't cut off funding earlier, not that it happened too soon (and we are still arguing about Vietnam? Really?). And his DDT example is almost pure BS, and ignores the harm done by the pesticide to both animals and humans. Heck, it's conservatives who are anti-science and anti-logic, not liberals.

5. Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

Much less so than conservatives, but conservatives don't see being intolerant of, say, gays, as actually being intolerant, since they are immoral sinners (see #3) and don't deserve tolernance (in their minds).

In short, your blog sucks.
 
2012-03-27 11:24:51 AM
Agneska: This is the truth, but as usual fark libs can't handle it

Ah truthiness,, it's anything you say it is because why use facts when opinions are so much easier to fart.
Oh wait, you want me to tolerate homophobia, bigotry and lies.
Sorry Coulter, us fark libs won't bend to your will so easily.
We tend to call out BS when we see it.
Here's lookin at ya:P
 
2012-03-27 11:24:57 AM
juniperwasting: What the fark did I just read?

Seriously, the drivel, the derp, the wharrgharrblllll is astounding.


And there are some people out there right now thinking that this guy deserves to have his own column on NRO. Scary.
 
2012-03-27 11:25:10 AM
Diogenes: A Dark Evil Omen: Your problem is that you think "liberal" and "communist" are the same thing.

?


If someone is going to assert that someone can't be a liberal because they're a capitalist...
 
2012-03-27 11:25:11 AM
Zeno-25: HotIgneous Intruder: Most self-proclaiming liberals in the US and A are actually neoliberals and don't even know it.

Someone needs to learn their ideological labels.

[nicholasmead.files.wordpress.com image 192x299]


Uh, no.
Note the social progression here in the states: The hippies all bought brief cases and showed their true colors. Closet neoliberals to the marrow. Now, they run the country and look where we are. Douchebagville.
 
2012-03-27 11:25:37 AM
Headso: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?

odd how the way one side generalizes the other turns out to be bad, eh?

Odd how both sides are always so equivalent, eh?

yeah don't you know, decades of conservatives dehumanizing liberals on the radio, the television and major print and internet publications is equal to some of us saying mean things about "conservatives" on fark.com I generalize because I'm a farking idiot.


there ya go
 
2012-03-27 11:26:26 AM
Cythraul: Jake Havechek: BillCo: Seems spot on to me.

It would, to you.

Is this person a troll, or a true believer?


What's the difference?
 
2012-03-27 11:26:46 AM
Lando Lincoln: And there are some people out there right now thinking that this guy deserves to have his own column on NRO. Scary.

Hawkins or the Doughy Pantload... which would you choose?
 
2012-03-27 11:27:38 AM
peter21: After nationally syndicated columnist and blogger Michelle Malkin posted the e-mail addresses and phone numbers of three members of Students Against War, they received a flood of obscene and harassing messages from around the country, including death threats. When a liberal Web site, in retaliation, published Malkin's cell phone number and home address, a full-blown blog war ensued. "I am now forced to remove one of my children from school and move my family," Malkin wrote Thursday in an e-mail to the Sentinel.

So actions have consequences? Interesting...


'Cause freedom ain't free, son. You speechify, you pay the piper.
 
2012-03-27 11:27:56 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: His facebook photos (new window)


"You and John aren't friends."


No shiat.
 
2012-03-27 11:28:57 AM
skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?

odd how the way one side generalizes the other turns out to be bad, eh?

Odd how both sides are always so equivalent, eh?

the generalizations? Ya know, like the ones made in the article? Yeah, they tend to focus on the worst and apply it to all.


Yeah, the generalizations. Ya know, the ones in the article. They do tend to focus on the worst and apply it to all and let me tell you, they are equally applicable to both sides. You can make an exactly equal argument that conservatives are racist as you can liberals are racist. Just as you can make an exactly equal argument that conservatives don't care if their policies work as you can liberals don't care. And so on.

That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.
 
2012-03-27 11:30:33 AM
theorellior: The day that SkinnyHead is outed will be akin to the day that skookum was outed.

They are much quicker and harsher about scrubbing outings from threads to preserve trolls now. The outing of Tats as Mein should have been bigger but they deleted our whole conversation. Its sad really
 
2012-03-27 11:30:35 AM
lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad. Of course I wasn't saying that the generalizations applied to one must apply to the other. You made that up in that feverish little head of yours.
 
2012-03-27 11:30:53 AM
Zeno-25: HotIgneous Intruder: Most self-proclaiming liberals in the US and A are actually neoliberals and don't even know it.

Someone needs to learn their ideological labels.

[nicholasmead.files.wordpress.com image 192x299]


Also, Obama is a Chicago-school neoliberal who panders to the liberal-democrat base, such as it is.
 
2012-03-27 11:31:07 AM
"Lousy, no good tricksters... all kinds of liberals stink and I hate them!"

Mrs.Sharpier: [i96.photobucket.com image 397x604]

how about no


Did Juliette Lewis get a sex change and put on 80 pounds?
 
2012-03-27 11:31:10 AM
I May Be Crazy But...: I don't think Ebonics with a lisp would work, though.

i.i.com.com
 
2012-03-27 11:31:57 AM
skullkrusher: Headso: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?

odd how the way one side generalizes the other turns out to be bad, eh?

Odd how both sides are always so equivalent, eh?

yeah don't you know, decades of conservatives dehumanizing liberals on the radio, the television and major print and internet publications is equal to some of us saying mean things about "conservatives" on fark.com I generalize because I'm a farking idiot.

there ya go


catty
 
2012-03-27 11:32:38 AM
lennavan: And so on.

I think that skullkrusher was saying that it was stupid to make generalizations. You are not winning the fight by saying that you can be as moronic as the author fo TFA and make the same generalizations about conservatives.
 
2012-03-27 11:33:02 AM
Bloody William: The phrase I use in these situations is "Turn-about is fair play."

It's better than the Chicago way. If you pulled that shiat with me and my family, be glad rhetorical quid pro quo is all you get.

Thin-skinned little shiatheads.



No, no. You don't understand, there is no hate like liberal hate. We are always at war with Eurasia.
 
2012-03-27 11:33:12 AM
lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: Every single one of those things could be applied to a generalized view of the Right as well...

Both sides are bad you say?

odd how the way one side generalizes the other turns out to be bad, eh?

Odd how both sides are always so equivalent, eh?


Actually, I kinda think the whole point is that a subjective, vague, generalized list of characteristics like that could just as well be applied to left-handed auditors or people named "Dave".
 
2012-03-27 11:33:46 AM
skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.


Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.
 
2012-03-27 11:34:09 AM
Old School???

biglegalbrain.com
 
2012-03-27 11:35:10 AM
Whenever a prominent conservative gets sick or dies, there's an orgy of celebratory hatred on the Left. It happened with Reagan, Breitbart and every other big name conservative in between.

Brietbart was a pig who celebrated the deaths of several liberals. Reagan was classy. I didn't agree with him, but he was classy, and I don't know a single person who celebrated his death.

Also, you forgot your /b tag, buster.
 
2012-03-27 11:35:25 AM
Jake Havechek: Professional dick flogger.

That's MY gig.
 
2012-03-27 11:35:47 AM
Flab: lennavan: And so on.

I think that skullkrusher was saying that it was stupid to make generalizations. You are not winning the fight by saying that you can be as moronic as the author fo TFA and make the same generalizations about conservatives.


you'd think that someone couldn't misunderstand that and would have to be trying to pretend I was saying otherwise. Who would do something like that? Oh, right, lennavan would.
 
2012-03-27 11:35:47 AM
Barfmaker: 1) Most liberals are hateful people.
2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.
4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

Well there you have it, a well written and thoroughly researched piece that finally shines a much-needed light on the evils of liberalism. I'm thankful to this HTML challenged gentleman for having the courage to speak up.


Sounds like what some liberals I know say about the rich.

1) Most of the rich are hateful people.
2) The rich do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most of the rich are less moral than other people.
4) Most of the rich don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most of the rich are extremely intolerant.

Actually, I'd say it fits better on the rich than on libs.
 
2012-03-27 11:35:52 AM
Quoted from another thread with the recipients name changed

By theoriginalinternettroll


Dear Winterwhile, Skinnyhead,

I hope everything you say is true. I hope everything Santorum, Palin and Rush beleives in is 100% unequivocally and demonstrably true.

Do you know why?

Because I hope that one day an Obamacare 'death panel' will execute you, your mother, your family and every other mouth breathing, hypocritical, argumentative, petty, impotent, right-wing batshiat crazy threadjacking douchebag like you. *Looks sternly at Roy G Biv*

But before they swab your arm with an alcohol prep pad to sterilize the site where they will put the lethal injection I hope they give you a medically unnecessary transvaginal ultrasound. And while they're doing that I hope they call you a slut. Not that you've ever ever had sex with any member of your own species but I hope they call you a slut for the sake of all those chickens you farked into a bloody pulp in this thread alone

What's that? You don't have a vagina? Well I hope they give you an equally unneccessary gender reassignment surgery, but without anesthesia (for the sake of fiscal conservation) just so you can experience the sheer delight of how amazingly right your political convictions are.

In short please take your logical, well thought out and articulated arguments and DIAF
 
2012-03-27 11:36:44 AM
Flab: I think that skullkrusher was saying that it was stupid to make generalizations.

I'm super excited to bookmark this thread and refer skullkrusher and you back to it whenever you make a generalization in the future.

"Steak is delicious!" OH HO HO MY FRIEND 100% OF STEAKS ARE NOT DELICIOUS. SEE FOR INSTANCE APPLEBEES AND/OR WELL DONE.
 
2012-03-27 11:37:44 AM
1) Most liberals are hateful people.

Really?

i449.photobucket.com

I honestly think that this election there is a party of hate. The Republican party leadership has stated in the past that elected Republicans only owe allegiance and service to Republicans and not any other American. When you attack half the people in this country and threaten them with rape wands, it pretty much confirms my suspicions. There may be hateful liberals but they don't tend to group in large numbers.
 
2012-03-27 11:37:48 AM
skullkrusher: Flab: lennavan: And so on.

I think that skullkrusher was saying that it was stupid to make generalizations. You are not winning the fight by saying that you can be as moronic as the author fo TFA and make the same generalizations about conservatives.

you'd think that someone couldn't misunderstand that and would have to be trying to pretend I was saying otherwise. Who would do something like that? Oh, right, lennavan would.


No, I absolutely knew that was what you were saying. That's why I'm making fun of you because of how inherently stupid that statement is.
 
2012-03-27 11:38:05 AM
HotIgneous Intruder: 1) Liberals do not exist in the United States of America (they only think they do).

/I've discovered, much to my horror, that my political self-identification was mostly wrong for 20 or so years. I'm socially liberal, but a fiscal conservative, pretty much the earmarks of a paleoconservative. Most self-proclaiming liberals in the US and A are actually neoliberals and don't even know it.


Words have different meanings in the US and the UK.

1.bp.blogspot.com

The term "liberal" has a different meaning in the United States than in the UK. In the UK, it's meaning is closer to the American term "libertarian", with "left" meaning there what Americans refer to "liberal".

And you are really wrong with the definition of the term "paleoconservative". Pat Buchanan is a "paleoconservative". That is, an ultranationalist with social conservative beliefs.
 
2012-03-27 11:38:12 AM
lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.


digboston.com

/sorry
//first thing a GIS for "look at me I'm an idiot" turned up
 
2012-03-27 11:39:10 AM
skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.

[digboston.com image 500x683]

/sorry
//first thing a GIS for "look at me I'm an idiot" turned up


It looks like Stephen Colbert cosplaying as Klaus Nomi.
 
2012-03-27 11:39:17 AM
skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.

[digboston.com image 500x683]

/sorry
//first thing a GIS for "look at me I'm an idiot" turned up


Hehe, yeah, whenever someone makes a good point and I have no reply I post a picture and hope no one notices I never actually responded too.
 
2012-03-27 11:39:50 AM
Moar bold = moar right-ness!!
 
2012-03-27 11:40:21 AM
oh for fark's sake.
 
2012-03-27 11:40:34 AM
lennavan: skullkrusher: Flab: lennavan: And so on.

I think that skullkrusher was saying that it was stupid to make generalizations. You are not winning the fight by saying that you can be as moronic as the author fo TFA and make the same generalizations about conservatives.

you'd think that someone couldn't misunderstand that and would have to be trying to pretend I was saying otherwise. Who would do something like that? Oh, right, lennavan would.

No, I absolutely knew that was what you were saying. That's why I'm making fun of you because of how inherently stupid that statement is.


lennavan: You can make an exactly equal argument that conservatives are racist as you can liberals are racist. Just as you can make an exactly equal argument that conservatives don't care if their policies work as you can liberals don't care.

yes, this truly shows that you "understood" and were not pretending to be an idiot. You're probably not as stupid as you portray yourself. Makes one wonder - most people talk about their 11" cocks and million dollar houses on the internet. You try to make yourself look like a far greater fool than you actually probably are. Internet exaggeration - you're doing it wrong.
 
2012-03-27 11:40:39 AM
adamgreeney: They are much quicker and harsher about scrubbing outings from threads to preserve trolls now. The outing of Tats as Mein should have been bigger but they deleted our whole conversation. Its sad really

Y'know, it's gotta suck reading threads for the sole purpose of monitoring the health of trolls and threadshiatters. And not only the threads you want to read, every thread. I think I'd go spla if I had to do that for a living.
 
2012-03-27 11:41:00 AM
Barfmaker: 1) Most liberals are hateful people.
2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.
4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.


Pulled directly from the ugliest racist depths of 4chan.

Fark is really just one banjo twang away from being on the southern poverty law centers watch list.
 
2012-03-27 11:41:04 AM
Cythraul
Jake Havechek: BillCo: Seems spot on to me.

It would, to you.

Is this person a troll, or a true believer?


Is there a difference?
 
2012-03-27 11:41:26 AM
skullkrusher: lennavan: You can make an exactly equal argument that conservatives are racist as you can liberals are racist. Just as you can make an exactly equal argument that conservatives don't care if their policies work as you can liberals don't care.

yes, this truly shows that you "understood" and were not pretending to be an idiot


Wait until you turn your sarcasm detector on.
 
2012-03-27 11:41:38 AM
lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.

[digboston.com image 500x683]

/sorry
//first thing a GIS for "look at me I'm an idiot" turned up

Hehe, yeah, whenever someone makes a good point and I have no reply I post a picture and hope no one notices I never actually responded too.


[montoya.jpg]
 
2012-03-27 11:41:55 AM
I'm all for over-generalizations. They make stupid people think they are smart and they make smart people aware of who is stupid.
 
2012-03-27 11:42:02 AM
Okay, boys, get a room already. Take your love affair off-site.
 
2012-03-27 11:43:02 AM
HotIgneous Intruder: peter21: After nationally syndicated columnist and blogger Michelle Malkin posted the e-mail addresses and phone numbers of three members of Students Against War, they received a flood of obscene and harassing messages from around the country, including death threats. When a liberal Web site, in retaliation, published Malkin's cell phone number and home address, a full-blown blog war ensued. "I am now forced to remove one of my children from school and move my family," Malkin wrote Thursday in an e-mail to the Sentinel.

So actions have consequences? Interesting...

'Cause freedom ain't free, son. You speechify, you pay the piper.


Freedom costs a buck o five!
 
2012-03-27 11:43:38 AM
lennavan: Flab: I think that skullkrusher was saying that it was stupid to make generalizations.

I'm super excited to bookmark this thread and refer skullkrusher and you back to it whenever you make a generalization in the future.

"Steak is delicious!" OH HO HO MY FRIEND 100% OF STEAKS ARE NOT DELICIOUS. SEE FOR INSTANCE APPLEBEES AND/OR WELL DONE.


Dude. Switch to decaf.

Also, if you see me making sweeping generalizations, feel free to let me know. I do try to be better than that.
 
2012-03-27 11:44:06 AM
When you think someone's a tard, pulling opinions out his arse, don't immediately set out to prove most of his contentions correct.
 
2012-03-27 11:44:31 AM
skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.

[digboston.com image 500x683]

/sorry
//first thing a GIS for "look at me I'm an idiot" turned up

Hehe, yeah, whenever someone makes a good point and I have no reply I post a picture and hope no one notices I never actually responded too.

[montoya.jpg] Yeah, you're right. When by example with the fish and the bird, you clearly demonstrated that while sure both are generalizations, they are not always equivalent, I understood your point. I then applied that lesson to the discussion we were having about conservatives and liberals. Turns out both sides might be bad but like you were saying, are not equally bad. I will still vote (R) anyway.


Oh, wow, that was unexpected honesty from you. Hey, lets hug it out.
 
2012-03-27 11:45:12 AM
Obvious statements are obvious.

The article was flawless, however, except for the failure to close the bold tag.
 
2012-03-27 11:45:16 AM
Flab: Dude. Switch to decaf.

Also, if you see me making sweeping generalizations, feel free to let me know. I do try to be better than that.


I haven't had any caffeine yet today. We'll call that #1.
 
2012-03-27 11:46:05 AM
skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.

[digboston.com image 500x683]

/sorry
//first thing a GIS for "look at me I'm an idiot" turned up


It's not equally bad. It's equally present.
 
2012-03-27 11:46:38 AM
lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.

[digboston.com image 500x683]

/sorry
//first thing a GIS for "look at me I'm an idiot" turned up

Hehe, yeah, whenever someone makes a good point and I have no reply I post a picture and hope no one notices I never actually responded too.

[montoya.jpg] Yeah, you're right. When by example with the fish and the bird, you clearly demonstrated that while sure both are generalizations, they are not always equivalent, I understood your point. I then applied that lesson to the discussion we were having about conservatives and liberals. Turns out both sides might be bad but like you were saying, are not equally bad. I will still vote (R) anyway.

Oh, wow, that was unexpected honesty from you. Hey, lets hug it out.


you shame your parents
 
2012-03-27 11:47:00 AM
what_now: How do I get a gig as a "Professional blogger?"

1. Lose your job
2. Assume everyone cares about your opinions
3. Make sure you refer to posts as "rants" and "articles"
4. Forget everything you know about HTML.
 
2012-03-27 11:47:05 AM
Geotpf: HotIgneous Intruder: 1) Liberals do not exist in the United States of America (they only think they do).

/I've discovered, much to my horror, that my political self-identification was mostly wrong for 20 or so years. I'm socially liberal, but a fiscal conservative, pretty much the earmarks of a paleoconservative. Most self-proclaiming liberals in the US and A are actually neoliberals and don't even know it.

Words have different meanings in the US and the UK.

[1.bp.blogspot.com image 549x362]

The term "liberal" has a different meaning in the United States than in the UK. In the UK, it's meaning is closer to the American term "libertarian", with "left" meaning there what Americans refer to "liberal".

And you are really wrong with the definition of the term "paleoconservative". Pat Buchanan is a "paleoconservative". That is, an ultranationalist with social conservative beliefs.


So how does it feel to be an idiot?
Perhaps you should write a book.
 
2012-03-27 11:47:20 AM
skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.

[digboston.com image 500x683]

/sorry
//first thing a GIS for "look at me I'm an idiot" turned up

Hehe, yeah, whenever someone makes a good point and I have no reply I post a picture and hope no one notices I never actually responded too.

[montoya.jpg] Yeah, you're right. When by example with the fish and the bird, you clearly demonstrated that while sure both are generalizations, they are not always equivalent, I understood your point. I then applied that lesson to the discussion we were having about conservatives and liberals. Turns out both sides might be bad but like you were saying, are not equally bad. I will still vote (R) anyway.

Oh, wow, that was unexpected honesty from you. Hey, lets hug it out.

you shame your parents


So no hug then?
 
2012-03-27 11:49:07 AM
Somebody take away this guy's crayon already...

/If I ever need an example of a straw man argument, I'll be sure to refer people to this link.
 
2012-03-27 11:49:44 AM
Anti_illuminati: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.

[digboston.com image 500x683]

/sorry
//first thing a GIS for "look at me I'm an idiot" turned up

It's not equally bad. It's equally present.


are we trying to generalize generalizations now? We've gotta pretty meta which is hard for liberals because they're ruled by emotion rather than reason and logic. I know this because as a conservative American, God told me.
 
2012-03-27 11:50:19 AM
skullkrusher: Anti_illuminati: skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: That list is a true equivalency. You were right to point out that both sides are indeed equally bad.

the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Absolutely. I mean, it's a generalization to say birds can fly. Some can't! It's also a generalization to say fish can't breath under water. Some can!

So if you were to say birds can fly and I were to say fish can't breath underwater, we would both be equally bad. That's why I would vote for you. Because the dishonesty in both statements is absolutely equivalent so my vote would default to the right.

[digboston.com image 500x683]

/sorry
//first thing a GIS for "look at me I'm an idiot" turned up

It's not equally bad. It's equally present.

are we trying to generalize generalizations now? We've gotta gotten pretty meta which is hard for liberals because they're ruled by emotion rather than reason and logic. I know this because as a conservative American, God told me.
 
2012-03-27 11:50:54 AM
lennavan: So no hug then?

I will hug you in one (1) week if you can not be a ninny for that period of time.
 
2012-03-27 11:52:00 AM
skullkrusher: lennavan: So no hug then?

I will hug you in one (1) week if you can not be a ninny for that period of time.


Sounds good. And hey, the important thing to remember is, you never had to reply to the point I made about not all generalizations being the same. It was a successful dodge.

Kudos, good sir.
 
2012-03-27 11:53:02 AM
lennavan: skullkrusher: lennavan: So no hug then?

I will hug you in one (1) week if you can not be a ninny for that period of time.

Sounds good. And hey, the important thing to remember is, you never had to reply to the point I made about not all generalizations being the same. It was a successful dodge.

Kudos, good sir.


no hug for you. I don't want to catch stupid.
 
2012-03-27 11:53:12 AM
skullkrusher: are we trying to generalize generalizations now? We've gotta pretty meta which is hard for liberals because they're ruled by emotion rather than reason and logic. I know this because as a conservative American, God told me.

Ha!

politicalgraffiti.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-03-27 11:53:33 AM
How did this whole Fascism = Liberalism meme start? I have seen this argument dozens of times, but for the life of me I cannot understand how anyone with even a modicum of understanding of history can possibly conflate the two.

Fascism combines the principles of ultra-nationalism, claiming the legitimacy of a totalitarian state, all the while commingling the power of that state and corporate/business interest for the benefit of the few to the detriment of the many.

The three greatest examples of fascist leaders are: the "inventor" of fascist theory itself Bennito Mussolini, Gen. Francisco Franco of Spain and of course, Adolph Hitler.

I challenge anyone on the right to find any prevailing "liberal" principles in the governmental doctrines and policies of any of those three movement leaders. They are about as decidedly "non-liberal" as one can be on the political scale.
 
2012-03-27 11:56:20 AM
skullkrusher: are we trying to generalize generalizations now?

You've been doing that all along. Your whole point is that all generalizations are the same. Where the hell have you been? You'd think someone coudln't misunderstand that and would have to be as moronic as the author fo TFA.

skullkrusher: Flab: lennavan: And so on.

I think that skullkrusher was saying that it was stupid to make generalizations. You are not winning the fight by saying that you can be as moronic as the author fo TFA and make the same generalizations about conservatives.

you'd think that someone couldn't misunderstand that and would have to be trying to pretend I was saying otherwise.


skullkrusher: the way one generalizes the other? Yeah, equally bad.

Yes, according to SK, all generalizations are equally bad.
 
2012-03-27 11:56:23 AM
SisterMaryElephant: The conservative leaders of today are full of morals.

You misspelled "shiat".
 
2012-03-27 11:56:56 AM
lawboy87: How did this whole Fascism = Liberalism meme start? I have seen this argument dozens of times, but for the life of me I cannot understand how anyone with even a modicum of understanding of history can possibly conflate the two.

Fascism combines the principles of ultra-nationalism, claiming the legitimacy of a totalitarian state, all the while commingling the power of that state and corporate/business interest for the benefit of the few to the detriment of the many.

The three greatest examples of fascist leaders are: the "inventor" of fascist theory itself Bennito Mussolini, Gen. Francisco Franco of Spain and of course, Adolph Hitler.

I challenge anyone on the right to find any prevailing "liberal" principles in the governmental doctrines and policies of any of those three movement leaders. They are about as decidedly "non-liberal" as one can be on the political scale.


A fear peddler named Jonah Goldberg

samuelatgilgal.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-03-27 11:56:59 AM
I think I'm gonna quit my job and work for Townhall instead.

5 Uncomfortable Truths About Liberals

1. They're all stupid
2. They're all jerks
3. Nobody likes them
4. They're wrong about everything
5. They all hate America

Paycheck, please.
 
2012-03-27 11:57:16 AM
Anti_illuminati: skullkrusher: are we trying to generalize generalizations now? We've gotta pretty meta which is hard for liberals because they're ruled by emotion rather than reason and logic. I know this because as a conservative American, God told me.

Ha!

[politicalgraffiti.files.wordpress.com image 499x592]


Those are Tears of Socrates! It's like the Stigmata for people who are so rational they cry tears with the exact same chemical composition as the hemlock tea that killed the Great Thinker. Look it up, libtard.
 
2012-03-27 11:58:06 AM
meat0918: A fear peddler named Jonah Goldberg

We also would have accepted "Doughy Pantload".
 
2012-03-27 11:58:25 AM
One simple truth about conservative bloggers

images.sodahead.com
 
2012-03-27 11:58:35 AM
lennavan: Yes, according to SK, all generalizations are equally bad.

yes, the act of generalizing is equally bad regardless of who does it or about whom the generalizations are made. This truly cannot possibly be this hard for you to get.

Even if so, I'm done. Tell your mom how you annoyed someone into submission on the internet
 
2012-03-27 11:59:27 AM
After reading that I need to go douche my brain.
 
2012-03-27 12:00:28 PM
lawboy87: How did this whole Fascism = Liberalism meme start? I have seen this argument dozens of times, but for the life of me I cannot understand how anyone with even a modicum of understanding of history can possibly conflate the two.

Three reasons.

1 - False equivalence. Nazis are bad. Libs are bad too. Therefore Libs are Nazis.

2 - Mussolini was a socialist before deciding to become a fascist, therefore fascism is socialism, because we all know that once you go Marx, you never go back.

3 - The Nazis have socialist in their party naem, what more do you need as a proof?

Note: I do not endorse the above explanations, but I've seen all three being used on Fark to explain why fascism was really socialism.
 
2012-03-27 12:00:51 PM
"Liberals are are the real racists" may be the most impressive display of the Right turning the truth inside out and getting their not so bright followers to believe it since "The Estate Tax is a Death Tax and the IRS is gonna take your double wide when you die"
 
2012-03-27 12:02:06 PM
spellchecking is for the weak.
 
2012-03-27 12:03:55 PM
LOL, Townhall? Really? The land of conspiracy theories, projection and hypocrisy?

No thanks.
 
2012-03-27 12:04:39 PM
cretinbob: [images.mmorpg.com image 320x418]

i1136.photobucket.com
 
2012-03-27 12:04:40 PM
jj325: "Liberals are are the real racists" may be the most impressive display of the Right turning the truth inside out and getting their not so bright followers to believe it since "The Estate Tax is a Death Tax and the IRS is gonna take your double wide when you die"

the cuts need to be reupped
 
2012-03-27 12:04:44 PM
Wow! The whining is almost superhuman!
 
2012-03-27 12:06:03 PM
Generally speaking, todays Conservative attacks the budget by throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
When did we lose sight of a more reasoned approach to these issues?

Answer: when the fundy lunatics were invited under the GOP umbrella and sent the sane Conservatives packing.

That's my general generalization of the general problem.
 
2012-03-27 12:06:56 PM
skullkrusher: I will sound stupid if I take your argument head on, so let me quick change it.

Okay, how will you do that? I was talking about how generalizations are not equal.

skullkrusher: I'm going to pretend you're talking about who is making the generalization or what the generalization is about.

Oh, cool. Go for it.

skullkrusher: the act of generalizing is equally bad regardless of who does it or about whom the generalizations are made. This truly cannot possibly be this hard for you to get.

Well done!

skullkrusher: Even if so, I'm done.

You certainly are! And hey, well done pretending my point was about the subject and not the content of the generalization.
 
2012-03-27 12:08:02 PM
skullkrusher: lennavan: Yes, according to SK, all generalizations are equally bad.

yes, the act of generalizing is equally bad regardless of who does it or about whom the generalizations are made. This truly cannot possibly be this hard for you to get.


You two are arguing two different things, your post there is refereeing the who and his is about the subject matter.
 
2012-03-27 12:08:38 PM
Five strawmen made-up to try and demonise liberals.
 
2012-03-27 12:08:46 PM
sbrownehr.com
 
2012-03-27 12:08:52 PM
heh refereeing... referring
 
Juc
2012-03-27 12:09:55 PM
Well that was sure a crappy article.
 
2012-03-27 12:10:19 PM
I prefer the term illiberal

Link (new window)
 
2012-03-27 12:12:15 PM
SevenizGud: Obvious statements are obvious.

The article was flawless, however, except for the failure to close the bold tag.


Well, the term "flawless" is open to interpretation. A perfect diamond is "flawless" - but so is a perfectly formed turd.
 
2012-03-27 12:14:01 PM
Wyalt Derp: Five strawmen made-up to try and demonise liberals.

Link (new window)
 
2012-03-27 12:15:19 PM
lennavan: skullkrusher: I will sound stupid if I take your argument head on, so let me quick change it.

Okay, how will you do that? I was talking about how generalizations are not equal.

skullkrusher: I'm going to pretend you're talking about who is making the generalization or what the generalization is about.

Oh, cool. Go for it.

skullkrusher: the act of generalizing is equally bad regardless of who does it or about whom the generalizations are made. This truly cannot possibly be this hard for you to get.

Well done!

skullkrusher: Even if so, I'm done.

You certainly are! And hey, well done pretending my point was about the subject and not the content of the generalization
I know how I'll save face! I'll pretend I agreed with you all along!.
 
2012-03-27 12:15:36 PM
Wow. There are things you can call libs out about, but that list doesn't even come close. Sounds more like the Conservatives I know.
 
2012-03-27 12:17:20 PM
illogic: One simple truth about conservative bloggers

[images.sodahead.com image 350x300]


A picture is worth 1,000 2 words.

/Seriously though, I love that we can just post a caption-less pic of a dude and we all know exactly what it means.
 
2012-03-27 12:17:25 PM
Why did he stop at 5? Did he need the other hand to type?
 
2012-03-27 12:18:05 PM
badaboom: I prefer the term illiberal

Link (new window)


Liberals are now assaulting liberalism! Have they no respect for anyone?
 
2012-03-27 12:18:30 PM
It's funny how race and racism in politics is mostly argued by honkies.

They don't have a farking clue, they just wanna impress everyone else.
 
2012-03-27 12:19:19 PM
lawboy87: How did this whole Fascism = Liberalism meme start? I have seen this argument dozens of times, but for the life of me I cannot understand how anyone with even a modicum of understanding of history can possibly conflate the two.

Nazi is short for the german for National Socialism. Therefore Nazi's are socialists, therefore socialism is fascist.

Just like North Koreans live in a republic democracy because they live in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
 
2012-03-27 12:19:23 PM
6 Liberals are evil because if they see something done by one conservative, they always use that to brand all conservatives. I know this because I saw a liberal do it once.
 
2012-03-27 12:19:49 PM
rightwingnews.com

2 wings out of their nutsack
 
2012-03-27 12:20:15 PM
You two really killed this thread. Strong work.
 
2012-03-27 12:21:01 PM
Greasy Fatassmitter,

you, your shiatty blog and your shiatty life suck.

Sincerely,
9lb
 
2012-03-27 12:22:49 PM
Projection, denial and a fair dose of persecution complex. Yup, another conservative expose of liberals.
 
2012-03-27 12:23:26 PM
Mrs.Sharpier: You know, if I were an average republican I would be pissed that the admins green'd this piece of shiat blog.

All it does is make the other side seem more fanatical and stupid.

It's what's wrong with politics today, and admins YOU'RE NOT HELPING


-1


I really think it's the Republicans who aren't helping. If you read Republican legislation, you'll find out that it's all basically based on this guy's blog. For real.
 
2012-03-27 12:27:45 PM
badaboom: Wyalt Derp: Five strawmen made-up to try and demonise liberals.

Link (new window)


4.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-03-27 12:29:15 PM
thismomentinblackhistory: Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.

This.


Ok, I formally apologize for thinking you were a troll in some other thread I don't even remember. Sorry about that.
 
2012-03-27 12:31:02 PM
Barfmaker: 5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

Well there you have it, a well written and thoroughly researched piece that finally shines a much-needed light on the evils of liberalism. I'm thankful to this HTML challenged gentleman for having the courage to speak up.


Thanks for saving me the effort of reading that, but let me go ahead and guess that #5 is all about us being intolerant of intolerance.

For some reason, conservatives love to throw that one around like they think that it's some kind of logic bomb that's going to fry our circuits and make smoke pour out of our ears as we endlessly repeat, "BUT I HATE INTOLERANCE! BUT THAT IS INTOLERANCE! BUT I HATE INTOLERANCE! BUT THAT IS..."
 
2012-03-27 12:33:08 PM
Reading his Facebook posts and... wowza, he needs something else to do with his life.

/but at least he's not a birther
 
2012-03-27 12:33:30 PM
Surprised he didn't make a list of 25 points with him just saying 'libs are poopy heads!' and sticking his tongue out.

The sad thing that there are real people out there, not the fake accounts on Fark, that honestly believe this blog.
 
2012-03-27 12:33:58 PM
img201.imageshack.us
 
2012-03-27 12:34:05 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: I didn't suddenly decide I was a liberal one day, you fascist bastards declared me one when I didn't agree with you

/YBS


I considered myself a conservative for my entire adult life. When I didn't support Iraq II: Electric Boogaloo, I was informed at various points that I was a: f*ggot, a bastard, a piece of shiat, a communist, an arsehole, and a traitor, among other things. In the following 10 years I have grown into and embraced my externally-imposed liberalism, because conservatives are terrible, selfish, shallow, and frankly evil people that I don't want to be associated with anymore.
 
2012-03-27 12:35:16 PM
SurfaceTension: Hateful isn't the right word. But we do tend to expect the worst out of people, whereas I've come to realize conservatives expect the best

What the hell conservatives have you been around?
Conservatives are the ones who believe that most people are evil. Conservatives gives us such great statements as "How can you be moral without the Bible." and all morality comes from the Bible. Conservatives are the ones who believe that all religions that aren't Christian and possibly Judaism are evil. Conservatives are the ones who need to carry guns with them everywhere to protect them from other people.
Do I really have to go on?
 
2012-03-27 12:35:16 PM
Wow, that blog was painful when you got to the second post and it was suddenly all bold face... Is that the blogging equivalent of ALL CAPS?
 
2012-03-27 12:37:33 PM
Jake Havechek: SilentStrider: Mrs.Sharpier: His facebook photos (new window)

Looks like he uh ... errrr... Likes to have his picture taken with hot chicks

Gay.

Liberace gay.


Gay or not, he clearly has that Take It In The Ass world view that characterizes the modern conservaderper.
 
2012-03-27 12:38:35 PM
Whip My Head (new window)
 
2012-03-27 12:38:55 PM
Jackson Herring: 19.) Liberals have 11 toes

80) Liberals have penises that look like a little toe that is too small and has a tiny nail that is barely even a nail. But their little toes actually look like normal penises.
 
2012-03-27 12:39:47 PM
Some 'Splainin' To Do: Barfmaker: 5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

Well there you have it, a well written and thoroughly researched piece that finally shines a much-needed light on the evils of liberalism. I'm thankful to this HTML challenged gentleman for having the courage to speak up.

Thanks for saving me the effort of reading that, but let me go ahead and guess that #5 is all about us being intolerant of intolerance.

For some reason, conservatives love to throw that one around like they think that it's some kind of logic bomb that's going to fry our circuits and make smoke pour out of our ears as we endlessly repeat, "BUT I HATE INTOLERANCE! BUT THAT IS INTOLERANCE! BUT I HATE INTOLERANCE! BUT THAT IS..."


To be fair, libs are the real racists for pointing out the racism.
 
2012-03-27 12:40:09 PM
Gulper Eel: 1) Most liberals are hateful people.

The ones who moved to the infotainment business? No more or less hateful than the ones in the rest of the entertainment industry.

The liberals I know here in New York tend to come from communities where local government was competent, honest, frugal and largely apolitical. The problem happens when they think they can assume the same on a larger scale of state and federal legislators, and forget that power corrupts.


YMMV, but the liberals I knew in New York tended to come from New York, where local government was a mess, but at least it spoke with their accent.
 
2012-03-27 12:41:32 PM
Imagine, someone took the time to type out that whole article.
 
2012-03-27 12:43:23 PM
Nothing to see here but classic right wing projection.

/wow, did that blog suck
 
2012-03-27 12:44:05 PM
Mrs.Sharpier: You know, if I were an average republican I would be pissed that the admins green'd this piece of shiat blog.

All it does is make the other side seem more fanatical and stupid.

It's what's wrong with politics today, and admins YOU'RE NOT HELPING


-1


#OccupytheTEAParty
 
2012-03-27 12:44:50 PM
Also, at the risk of getting banhammered or suspended, what retard greenlit this piece of crap?
 
2012-03-27 12:45:31 PM
spongeboob: SurfaceTension: Hateful isn't the right word. But we do tend to expect the worst out of people, whereas I've come to realize conservatives expect the best

What the hell conservatives have you been around?
Conservatives are the ones who believe that most people are evil. Conservatives gives us such great statements as "How can you be moral without the Bible." and all morality comes from the Bible. Conservatives are the ones who believe that all religions that aren't Christian and possibly Judaism are evil. Conservatives are the ones who need to carry guns with them everywhere to protect them from other people.
Do I really have to go on?


Many years ago, when there were more rational divisions between liberal and conservative, I would have said that many conservatives don't really trust other people and so out of self interest limit the newer types of control others might be able to have over them.

However, modern liberals also seem to not trust other people and so some will now go as far as to want to limit what people can be allowed to eat because many people make bad choices.

One distinction is that conservatives used to favor solutions that were tried and tested where you at least knew the dangers and modes of screw up while liberals were ready and willing to try new solutions based on new ideas.

But nowadays, I fail to see what is actually driving anyone's politics other than attempts to gain power so that the other guys don't have it.
 
2012-03-27 12:46:43 PM
It must be great to be able to write a moronic little bullet list out on a blog, post it to Fark, and watch it not only get greened despite being ridiculously shallow bullshiat designed exclusively to inflame, but generate 10 pages of comments to boot.
 
2012-03-27 12:47:11 PM
Ironic that most of the posts in this thread prove a few of his points.

Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.
 
2012-03-27 12:48:45 PM
A Dark Evil Omen: Five uncomfortable truths about conservatives:

1) They can't cook. Anything cooked by a conservative ends up burnt and covered in American cheese.
2) They smell like sausages. This is self-explanatory.
3) Whenever at a party, conservatives always end up bullying the stereo playing Under Pressure over and over.
4) They have vestigial tails, which probably comes from their low breeding.
5) When cornered, conservatives will raise the front quarters of their bodies off the ground and flatten their necks in a threatening gesture.


U GIV KITTEH TEH HAPPI
www.picturesanimations.com
 
2012-03-27 12:51:03 PM
badaboom: Ironic that most of the posts in this thread prove a few of his points.

Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.


Those appear to be statements of fact.
 
2012-03-27 12:52:51 PM
badaboom: Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.

Calling him fat is childish.
Calling him an idiot is just using words correctly. Idiot: an utterly foolish or senseless person.
 
2012-03-27 12:56:09 PM
So, what do you think this guy's father tells his friends his son does for a living? Neurosurgeon? Navy SEAL? Suicide by autoerotic crucifixion?
 
2012-03-27 12:58:25 PM
for conservatives, there is really one uncomfortable truth about liberals: they are correct.
 
2012-03-27 01:00:27 PM
To be fair, Liberals are the real racists for being the first to bring race into everything.

Some people see the world as white and minority. Some people are smart.
 
2012-03-27 01:01:36 PM
Barfmaker:

How a moderate sees this

1) Most liberals are hateful people.

Both sides have hateful people, liberals just tend to be louder and can organize a sit in or march

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

This, unfortunately, is true

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.

wingnuts are just as farked up as moonbats. both are batshiat crazy

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.

This is true more often than not.

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

I see he has been reading fark politics tab
 
2012-03-27 01:03:18 PM
Ctrl-Alt-Del: [we are the 27%.jpg]

BMI is more like 47%.
 
2012-03-27 01:03:26 PM
6) Liberals cook puppies alive then eat them for dinner.
 
2012-03-27 01:04:09 PM
sweetmelissa31: Jackson Herring: 19.) Liberals have 11 toes

80) Liberals have penises that look like a little toe that is too small and has a tiny nail that is barely even a nail. But their little toes actually look like normal penises.


This one is actually true, unlike all the other posts in this thread or the article
 
2012-03-27 01:05:19 PM
pxsteel: Barfmaker:

How a moderate sees this

1) Most liberals are hateful people.

Both sides have hateful people, liberals just tend to be louder and can organize a sit in or march

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

This, unfortunately, is true

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.

wingnuts are just as farked up as moonbats. both are batshiat crazy

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.

This is true more often than not.

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

I see he has been reading fark politics tab


lolwut
 
2012-03-27 01:05:22 PM
I enjoy the fact that he says liberals are horrible and intolerant while making "liberal" sound like a dirty word.

/liberal independent
 
2012-03-27 01:07:26 PM
pxsteel: Barfmaker:

How a moderate sees this

1) Most liberals are hateful people.

Both sides have hateful people, liberals just tend to be louder and can organize a sit in or march

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

This, unfortunately, is true

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.

wingnuts are just as farked up as moonbats. both are batshiat crazy

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.

This is true more often than not.

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

I see he has been reading fark politics tab


As a moderat" how would you feel about these statements:


1) Most conservatives are hateful people
2) Conservatives do more than any other group to encourage race, gender, religion and sexual orientaion -based hatred.
3) Most Conservatives are less moral than other people.
4) Most Conservatives don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Most Conservatives are extremely intolerant.
 
2012-03-27 01:10:18 PM
Mugato: "Professional blogger". Jesus H. Christ.

Are you saying that Jesus is a Professional Blogger? I could read a blog by that damn hippie liberal...
 
2012-03-27 01:11:07 PM
I see the official refutation of yesterday's "conservatives understand liberals but liberals don't understand conservatives" story has been greenlighted.
 
2012-03-27 01:11:19 PM
"most liberals" blah blah.. I love how he just declares it without any scientific backup.

I have no doubt that ever liberal he's met has struck him as a jerk, but it's almost guaranteed that they are jerks because of how he acts when he finds out they're a liberal. If you walk around being a farking asshole to everyone, declaring that the world is filled with unpleasant people only shows how utterly blind you are to your own behavior.
 
2012-03-27 01:13:36 PM
asquian: 1) Most liberals are "hateful" people.
2) Liberals do more than any other "group" to encourage race-based "hatred".
3) Most liberals are less "moral" than other people.
4) Most liberals don't care if the "policies" they "advocate" work or not.
5) Most liberals are "extremely intolerant".

Fixed.


cdn.racerxonline.com

Sees what you did, there.

I'm not "camera friendly", I don't "wear clothes that fit me", I'm not a "heartbreaker", I haven't had "sex with a woman", I don't know "how that works", I don't "fall in line", I'm not "hygienic", I don't "wipe properly", I lack "style", I don't have "self-esteem", I have no "charisma", I don't "own a toothbrush", I don't "let my scabs heal", I can't "reach all the parts of my body"
 
2012-03-27 01:13:43 PM
impaler: badaboom: Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.

Calling him fat is childish.
Calling him an idiot is just using words correctly. Idiot: an utterly foolish or senseless person.


Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.
 
2012-03-27 01:15:03 PM
pxsteel: Barfmaker:

How a moderate sees this

1) Most liberals are hateful people.

Both sides have hateful people, liberals just tend to be louder and can organize a sit in or march

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

This, unfortunately, is true

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.

wingnuts are just as farked up as moonbats. both are batshiat crazy

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.

This is true more often than not.

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

I see he has been reading fark politics tab


"I don't always vote for the same party, but when I do, I vote Republican"
stealthisfirst.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-03-27 01:16:05 PM
badaboom: impaler: badaboom: Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.

Calling him fat is childish.
Calling him an idiot is just using words correctly. Idiot: an utterly foolish or senseless person.

Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.


Calling someone a fat idiot is intolerant? Silly me, I thought intolerance was stuff like denying equal rights to gays, racial profiling, etc. Apparently now calling out every fat idiot means you're a bigot.
 
2012-03-27 01:16:43 PM
Barfmaker: 2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

A registered Democrat did shoot Trayvon Martin which has encouraged race-based hatred.
 
2012-03-27 01:18:31 PM
skullkrusher: lennavan: skullkrusher: I will sound stupid if I take your argument head on, so let me quick change it.

Okay, how will you do that? I was talking about how generalizations are not equal.

skullkrusher: I'm going to pretend you're talking about who is making the generalization or what the generalization is about.

Oh, cool. Go for it.

skullkrusher: the act of generalizing is equally bad regardless of who does it or about whom the generalizations are made. This truly cannot possibly be this hard for you to get.

Well done!

skullkrusher: Even if so, I'm done.

You certainly are! And hey, well done pretending my point was about the subject and not the content of the generalization I know how I'll save face! I'll pretend I agreed with you all along!.


Are you pretending you agreed with me all along now? Man you're a knob.

The hug offer is off the table now man.
 
2012-03-27 01:18:32 PM
soy_bomb: Barfmaker: 2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

A registered Democrat did shoot Trayvon Martin which has encouraged race-based hatred.


Zimmerman's a registered Democrat? That is hilarious.
 
2012-03-27 01:18:34 PM
Daraymann: To be fair, Liberals are the real racists for being the first to bring race into everything

LOL, to be fair, generalizing is generally intellectually lazy.
 
2012-03-27 01:21:23 PM
Flab: Three reasons.

1 - False equivalence. Nazis are bad. Libs are bad too. Therefore Libs are Nazis.

2 - Mussolini was a socialist before deciding to become a fascist, therefore fascism is socialism, because we all know that once you go Marx, you never go back.

3 - The Nazis have socialist in their party naem, what more do you need as a proof?

Note: I do not endorse the above explanations, but I've seen all three being used on Fark to explain why fascism was really socialism.


It's rather generous to give them credit for knowing even that much history.
 
2012-03-27 01:23:17 PM
badaboom: Ironic that most of the posts in this thread prove a few of his points.

Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.


Calling him fat may be intolerant, but if he's an idiot, then calling him out on it doesn't mean that they are intolerant, they're just pointing out the obvious.
 
2012-03-27 01:24:27 PM
CPennypacker: Calling someone a fat idiot is intolerant? Silly me, I thought intolerance was stuff like denying equal rights to gays, racial profiling, etc. Apparently now calling out every fat idiot means you're a bigot.

Calling someone a black/gay/hispanic idiot is intolerant? Silly me, I thought intolerance was stuff like denying equal rights to everyone whether or not they are mobidly obese. Apparently now calling out every black/gay/hispanic idiot means you're a bigot.

Yes, it is intolerant. Judge someone by the content of their character, not by their body habitus. How do you expect respect for yourself and your opinion when you condemn someone's opinion who is fat?
 
2012-03-27 01:25:21 PM
qorkfiend: soy_bomb: Barfmaker: 2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
A registered Democrat did shoot Trayvon Martin which has encouraged race-based hatred.
Zimmerman's a registered Democrat? That is hilarious.


Its actually very sad, it continues a long history of Democratic violence against African-Americans that finds its roots in the founding of the Klu Klux Klan.
 
2012-03-27 01:25:30 PM
Five uncomfortable truths about John Hawkins:
1) He is too fat
2) He is spending too much on photos
3) He had Phil Herup fix his teeth
4) He sweats too much
5) He is a stupid Republican attention whore
 
2012-03-27 01:26:12 PM
badaboom: CPennypacker: Calling someone a fat idiot is intolerant? Silly me, I thought intolerance was stuff like denying equal rights to gays, racial profiling, etc. Apparently now calling out every fat idiot means you're a bigot.

Calling someone a black/gay/hispanic idiot is intolerant? Silly me, I thought intolerance was stuff like denying equal rights to everyone whether or not they are mobidly obese. Apparently now calling out every black/gay/hispanic idiot means you're a bigot.

Yes, it is intolerant. Judge someone by the content of their character, not by their body habitus. How do you expect respect for yourself and your opinion when you condemn someone's opinion who is fat?


Nobody condemned his opinion because he was fat. They condemned his opinion because he's an idiot. Then they made fun of him because he's fat.
 
2012-03-27 01:27:57 PM
Mikey1969: badaboom: Ironic that most of the posts in this thread prove a few of his points.

Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.

Calling him fat may be intolerant, but if he's an idiot, then calling him out on it doesn't mean that they are intolerant, they're just pointing out the obvious.


Idiot is a loaded word. An opinion can be idiotic. But calling a person an idiot is intolerant.
 
2012-03-27 01:28:59 PM
badaboom: Yes, it is intolerant. Judge someone by the content of their character, not by their body habitus. How do you expect respect for yourself and your opinion when you condemn someone's opinion who is fat?

Making fun of a fat ass is judging someone by the content of their character. This guy has all the answers but yet can't figure out how not to eat 30 hotpockets in 1 sitting?
 
2012-03-27 01:29:23 PM
soy_bomb: wahhh wahhh dems

www.mylespaul.com
 
2012-03-27 01:29:58 PM
soy_bomb: ts actually very sad, it continues a long history of Democratic violence against African-Americans that finds its roots in the founding of the Klu Klux Klan.

That one sentence omits the historical shenanigans of why Southern Democrats left the the Democratic party and went over to the GOP side.
It's very sad you chose to be disingenuous with your statement in an effort to make a pointless point.
 
2012-03-27 01:31:13 PM
badaboom: Yes, it is intolerant. Judge someone by the content of their character, not by their body habitus. How do you expect respect for yourself and your opinion when you condemn someone's opinion who is fat?

Well, I don't care whether he's fat or not, but he sure is a hypocrite, liar and troll. And that's giving him the benefit of the doubt and assuming he's dishonest and not just completely stupid.

And you are a jackass. Enjoy being judged by the content of your character?
 
2012-03-27 01:31:18 PM
badaboom: Mikey1969: badaboom: Ironic that most of the posts in this thread prove a few of his points.

Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.

Calling him fat may be intolerant, but if he's an idiot, then calling him out on it doesn't mean that they are intolerant, they're just pointing out the obvious.

Idiot is a loaded word. An opinion can be idiotic. But calling a person an idiot is intolerant.


Let's all try to be pc guys!

You sound like that hippie teacher in Beavis and Butthead. Grow a pair.
 
2012-03-27 01:32:14 PM
badaboom: Mikey1969: badaboom: Ironic that most of the posts in this thread prove a few of his points.

Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.

Calling him fat may be intolerant, but if he's an idiot, then calling him out on it doesn't mean that they are intolerant, they're just pointing out the obvious.

Idiot is a loaded word. An opinion can be idiotic. But calling a person an idiot is intolerant.


Is calling a group of people "hatefilled" tolerant?
 
2012-03-27 01:32:37 PM
smeegle: soy_bomb: ts actually very sad, it continues a long history of Democratic violence against African-Americans that finds its roots in the founding of the Klu Klux Klan.

That one sentence omits the historical shenanigans of why Southern Democrats left the the Democratic party and went over to the GOP side.
It's very sad you chose to be disingenuous with your statement in an effort to make a pointless point.


soy_bomb? Being disingenuous in order to score Mavrick Points?

www.pidradio.com
 
2012-03-27 01:32:44 PM
www.ackbar.org

YOUR BLOG SUCKS
 
2012-03-27 01:36:44 PM
"That's just the thing that the guys who oppose the things you support want you to do."
 
2012-03-27 01:37:35 PM
Halli: badaboom: Mikey1969: badaboom: Ironic that most of the posts in this thread prove a few of his points.

Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.

Calling him fat may be intolerant, but if he's an idiot, then calling him out on it doesn't mean that they are intolerant, they're just pointing out the obvious.

Idiot is a loaded word. An opinion can be idiotic. But calling a person an idiot is intolerant.

Let's all try to be pc guys!

You sound like that hippie teacher in Beavis and Butthead. Grow a pair.



Nothing here is offensive to me. Go ahead and call him fat all you want. But don't say "How dare you call me intolerant you fat idiot". It makes you look like the idiot.
 
2012-03-27 01:38:18 PM
A Dark Evil Omen: soy_bomb? Being disingenuous in order to score Mavrick Points?

You're right, points must be given for consistency.
 
2012-03-27 01:38:33 PM
Holy shiat. All this time I thought I was a liberal because I figured the best way to go through life is to not be a dick and to work to create a healthier and happier society for everyone.

Now this helpful blogger has shown me that all liberals like me are actually hate-filled repressed Nazis. Wow thanks stereotypical chubby, white-bread, virgin basement-blogger.

It's a shame that we liberals started all those warsunder false pretenses and wrecked the economy. I guess I should go back to school and finish my GED in Law. Then I can be a good conservative foot-soldier.

farm8.staticflickr.com
 
2012-03-27 01:38:47 PM
A Dark Evil Omen: badaboom: Yes, it is intolerant. Judge someone by the content of their character, not by their body habitus. How do you expect respect for yourself and your opinion when you condemn someone's opinion who is fat?

Well, I don't care whether he's fat or not, but he sure is a hypocrite, liar and troll. And that's giving him the benefit of the doubt and assuming he's dishonest and not just completely stupid.

And you are a jackass. Enjoy being judged by the content of your character?


"How dare you call me intolerant you fat idiot". Can't see the irony?
 
2012-03-27 01:39:33 PM
badaboom: Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.

Wrong again. Calling someone fat is a childish insult. Calling someone an idiot because their gross generalizations (a trait of a weak mind) in no way reflects reality (another trait of a weak mind), and that those generalizations are nothing but straw-man arguments (another trait of a weak mind), is just stating the obvious.

Calling someone "stupid" for being stupid isn't intolerance.
 
2012-03-27 01:39:51 PM
1) Most liberals are hateful people. ... Whenever a prominent conservative gets sick or dies, there's an orgy of celebratory hatred on the Left. It happened with Reagan, Breitbart and every other big name conservative in between.

Yeah, you mention Breitbart. Let's look at what he said after Ted Kennedy's death, shall we?

Over the course of the next three hours, Breitbart unapologetically attacked Kennedy, calling him a "villain," "a big ass motherf@#$er," a "duplicitous bastard" and a "prick." "I'll shut my mouth for Carter. That's just politics. Kennedy was a special pile of human excrement," wrote Breitbart in one tweet.

And here I thought conservatives were the ones who said "you reap what you sow."

This is why liberals felt perfectly comfortable...harassing Michelle Malkin's family until they had to move, and publicly posting the addresses of ordinary citizens who opposed Prop 8.

Malkin, you say? Addresses, you say?

In April 2006, Students Against War (SAW), a campus group at University of California, Santa Cruz, staged a protest against the presence of military recruiters on campus, and sent out a press release containing contact details (names, phone numbers and e-mail addresses) of three student leaders for use by reporters. Malkin included these contact details in a blog column entitled "Seditious Santa Cruz vs. America". Malkin claimed the contact information was originally taken from SAW's own website, but that later SAW had removed it and had "wiped" the "cached version". The students asked Malkin to remove the contact details from her blog, but Malkin reposted them several times writing in her blog: "I am leaving it up. If you are contacting them, I do not condone death threats or foul language. As for SAW, my message is this: You are responsible for your individual actions. Other individuals are responsible for theirs. Grow up and take responsibility."

SAW remarked: "Due to the continued irresponsible actions of some bloggers, members of the group have received numerous death threats and anti-Semitic comments through phone calls and emails." A blog war ensued. Malkin claimed that she received hostile e-mails then her private home address, phone number, photos of her neighborhood and maps to her house were published on several websites. The Santa Cruz Sentinel reported receiving an email from Malkin saying that this forced her to remove one of her children from school and move her family.


Oh, I see - it's different when it affects her and her family.

But that's an isolated incident - she simply re-published something they had made available. That's not the same as finding the information and putting it...

Malkin posts 12-year-old's home address and personally stalks his family (new window).

Huh.

They're hate-filled people who are constantly accusing EVERYONE ELSE of behaving the way they do on a daily basis.

Adorable.
 
2012-03-27 01:40:11 PM
In other news, my next Fark handle will be stereotypical chubby white-bread virgin basement-blogger
 
2012-03-27 01:41:19 PM
Fatty fatty two by four
fatty fat fat attention whore.

- Now that is sophomoric and childish
Intolerance requires action, like criminalizing fatty fat fatness.

Amirite?
 
2012-03-27 01:41:30 PM
smeegle: soy_bomb: ts actually very sad, it continues a long history of Democratic violence against African-Americans that finds its roots in the founding of the Klu Klux Klan.

That one sentence omits the historical shenanigans of why Southern Democrats left the the Democratic party and went over to the GOP side.
It's very sad you chose to be disingenuous with your statement in an effort to make a pointless point.


soy_bomb being disingenuous? Say it ain't so!

i48.photobucket.com
 
2012-03-27 01:43:18 PM
Pharque-it: FiveSeven uncomfortable truths about John Hawkins:
1) He is too fat
2) He is spending too much on photos
3) He had Phil Herup fix his teeth
4) He sweats too much
5) He is a stupid Republican attention whore


6.) He is a messy eater
7.) He doesn't know how to use a napkin
 
2012-03-27 01:43:30 PM
CPennypacker: You two really killed this thread. Strong work.

They argue like this in every thread. Either they're gay for eachother or they're the same person.

pxsteel: How a moderate sees this:

As a moderate - a real moderate, mind you, not a Fark Independent™ - your dumb ass is why the rest of us get stuck with this annoying-as-hell "Both sides are bad" meme.

Every single word that Bold-Tag Blubberbutt wrote was a lie. The end.
 
2012-03-27 01:43:54 PM
badaboom: "How dare you call me intolerant you fat idiot". Can't see the irony?

Yes, it's kind of like him accusing me of being less moral because I attack the church.

You know, the church that calls me an abomination in the eyes of Christ?
You know, the church that works night and day to prevent me from marrying my boyfriend?
You know, the church that shelters and protects pedophiles?
You know, the church that screams bloody murder when I say "happy holidays"?
 
2012-03-27 01:45:12 PM
impaler: badaboom: Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.

Wrong again. Calling someone fat is a childish insult. Calling someone an idiot because their gross generalizations (a trait of a weak mind) in no way reflects reality (another trait of a weak mind), and that those generalizations are nothing but straw-man arguments (another trait of a weak mind), is just stating the obvious.

Calling someone "stupid" for being stupid isn't intolerance.


Yes it is. You can call the opinion stupid. But calling someone stupid is intolerant. Someone is not stupid just because you disagree with them.
 
2012-03-27 01:45:20 PM
Ctrl-Alt-Del: soy_bomb being disingenuous? Say it ain't so!

Wow never saw that little gem before.

on a side point,,,,mmmm Lobster
 
2012-03-27 01:45:20 PM
Every link in that "article" goes to the same site, all but two to this same "writer."

*animalcolor* is better than this guy.
 
2012-03-27 01:47:08 PM
The Why Not Guy: badaboom: "How dare you call me intolerant you fat idiot". Can't see the irony?

Yes, it's kind of like him accusing me of being less moral because I attack the church.

You know, the church that calls me an abomination in the eyes of Christ?
You know, the church that works night and day to prevent me from marrying my boyfriend?
You know, the church that shelters and protects pedophiles?
You know, the church that screams bloody murder when I say "happy holidays"?


You can point out his hypocrisy without reducing yourself or the argument. You know, the whole two wrongs don't make a right thing.
 
2012-03-27 01:47:17 PM
badaboom: impaler: badaboom: Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.

Wrong again. Calling someone fat is a childish insult. Calling someone an idiot because their gross generalizations (a trait of a weak mind) in no way reflects reality (another trait of a weak mind), and that those generalizations are nothing but straw-man arguments (another trait of a weak mind), is just stating the obvious.

Calling someone "stupid" for being stupid isn't intolerance.

Yes it is. You can call the opinion stupid. But calling someone stupid is intolerant. Someone is not stupid just because you disagree with them.


Not everything is a point of opinion. Sometimes you are just wrong. If you are wrong and you act like you are right, there's a good chance you are an idiot. Idiot is not a minority or a protected class (quite the opposite in fact)
 
2012-03-27 01:47:59 PM
Fluorescent Testicle: Bold-Tag Blubberbutt

Now that would be a cool sign on, for an ALT, for soy-bomb.
LOL
 
2012-03-27 01:48:27 PM
badaboom: Halli: badaboom: Mikey1969: badaboom: Ironic that most of the posts in this thread prove a few of his points.

Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.

Calling him fat may be intolerant, but if he's an idiot, then calling him out on it doesn't mean that they are intolerant, they're just pointing out the obvious.

Idiot is a loaded word. An opinion can be idiotic. But calling a person an idiot is intolerant.

Let's all try to be pc guys!

You sound like that hippie teacher in Beavis and Butthead. Grow a pair.


Nothing here is offensive to me. Go ahead and call him fat all you want. But don't say "How dare you call me intolerant you fat idiot". It makes you look like the idiot.


Nope. Making fun of fat idiots will never be intolerant in my eyes.
 
2012-03-27 01:49:33 PM
rufus-t-firefly: 1) Most liberals are hateful people. ... Whenever a prominent conservative gets sick or dies, there's an orgy of celebratory hatred on the Left. It happened with Reagan, Breitbart and every other big name conservative in between.

Yeah, you mention Breitbart. Let's look at what he said after Ted Kennedy's death, shall we?

Over the course of the next three hours, Breitbart unapologetically attacked Kennedy, calling him a "villain," "a big ass motherf@#$er," a "duplicitous bastard" and a "prick." "I'll shut my mouth for Carter. That's just politics. Kennedy was a special pile of human excrement," wrote Breitbart in one tweet.

And here I thought conservatives were the ones who said "you reap what you sow."

This is why liberals felt perfectly comfortable...harassing Michelle Malkin's family until they had to move, and publicly posting the addresses of ordinary citizens who opposed Prop 8.

Malkin, you say? Addresses, you say?

In April 2006, Students Against War (SAW), a campus group at University of California, Santa Cruz, staged a...


farm8.staticflickr.com

Seriously, Rufus T. You rock! Freedonia hails you!
 
2012-03-27 01:49:34 PM
This thread needs more of this sort of thing.
img855.imageshack.us
 
2012-03-27 01:53:48 PM
I think we're talking about simple poor spelling here.

Corrected:

1) Moist liberals are hateful people.
2) Literals do more than any other group to encourage lace-based hatred.
3) Moist liberals are less oral than other people.
4) Moist liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
5) Moist liberals are extremely [lactose-]intolerant.

See? He's talking mainly about *moist* liberals, not *all* liberals, and in #2, he's talking about people who are too literal; i.e., unable to understand analogy, and their hatred of lace.
 
2012-03-27 01:54:13 PM
badaboom: You can point out his hypocrisy without reducing yourself or the argument.

Isn't that exactly what I did?
 
2012-03-27 01:54:21 PM
badaboom: Someone is not stupid just because you disagree with them.

I know.

They're stupid be believing facts that are easily disproved.
They're stupid for engaging in fallacious reasoning.
They're stupid for not having the ability to use any sort of critical thinking skills.

If you want to say I'm intolerant of stupid people, go ahead. However, I'm not going to try to deny them any rights.
 
2012-03-27 01:55:39 PM
Remember folks, you aren't a liberal because those are your honestly held convictions. You're just doing it to impress the cool kids.

Oh-for-fark's sake that has to be the stupidest argument I've ever heard. It's right up there with the Statue of Liberty being a warning from France and the TEA Party suddenly marching in the streets over taxes and the national debt being too high the second that Bush left office.
 
MFL
2012-03-27 01:56:49 PM
qorkfiend Zimmerman's a registered Democrat? That is hilarious.

Wow.....just wow. All this after they spent all that money on the the president's new marketing gimick.


www.drudgereport.com
 
2012-03-27 01:57:39 PM
Fluorescent Testicle: As a moderate - a real moderate, mind you, not a Fark Independent™ - your dumb ass is why the rest of us get stuck with this annoying-as-hell "Both sides are bad" meme.

Every single word that Bold-Tag Blubberbutt wrote was a lie. The end.


You deserve a slow clap for that, sir.

I do get sick of "moderates" who think that being a moderate means that you stake out a position exactly half-way between the two sides, even if one of the sides is being batshiat insane. You see that kind of thing in creationist threads all the time where the "moderates" think that the best position is to teach evolution and creationism, and they all pat themselves on the back for being so perfectly "balanced".
 
2012-03-27 01:58:41 PM
CPennypacker: badaboom: impaler: badaboom: Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.

Wrong again. Calling someone fat is a childish insult. Calling someone an idiot because their gross generalizations (a trait of a weak mind) in no way reflects reality (another trait of a weak mind), and that those generalizations are nothing but straw-man arguments (another trait of a weak mind), is just stating the obvious.

Calling someone "stupid" for being stupid isn't intolerance.

Yes it is. You can call the opinion stupid. But calling someone stupid is intolerant. Someone is not stupid just because you disagree with them.

Not everything is a point of opinion. Sometimes you are just wrong. If you are wrong and you act like you are right, there's a good chance you are an idiot. Idiot is not a minority or a protected class (quite the opposite in fact)


Who is and who is not an idiot can be subjective. Of course there are things like IQ tests that are more objective. If you wanted to prove someone was an idiot you would need objective evidence. Something everyone could agree on. A low IQ could be enough to prove someone is an idiot. In your opinion this person is an idiot. You are entitled to that. But it proves nothing. It is just your opinion. Now if he said something like 2+2=5 or that the moon is made of cheese, which we could both agree is factually wrong, we could conclude this person may be an idiot. I could state here that I think you are an idiot. And no one could convince me otherwise since, hey, it is my opinion.
 
2012-03-27 01:58:50 PM
Mikey1969: Mugato: "Professional blogger". Jesus H. Christ.

Are you saying that Jesus is a Professional Blogger? I could read a blog by that damn hippie liberal...


Yeah but his blog was co-opted by some douchebag conservative named Paul.
 
2012-03-27 02:01:33 PM
badaboom: CPennypacker: badaboom: impaler: badaboom: Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.

Wrong again. Calling someone fat is a childish insult. Calling someone an idiot because their gross generalizations (a trait of a weak mind) in no way reflects reality (another trait of a weak mind), and that those generalizations are nothing but straw-man arguments (another trait of a weak mind), is just stating the obvious.

Calling someone "stupid" for being stupid isn't intolerance.

Yes it is. You can call the opinion stupid. But calling someone stupid is intolerant. Someone is not stupid just because you disagree with them.

Not everything is a point of opinion. Sometimes you are just wrong. If you are wrong and you act like you are right, there's a good chance you are an idiot. Idiot is not a minority or a protected class (quite the opposite in fact)

Who is and who is not an idiot can be subjective. Of course there are things like IQ tests that are more objective. If you wanted to prove someone was an idiot you would need objective evidence. Something everyone could agree on. A low IQ could be enough to prove someone is an idiot. In your opinion this person is an idiot. You are entitled to that. But it proves nothing. It is just your opinion. Now if he said something like 2+2=5 or that the moon is made of cheese, which we could both agree is factually wrong, we could conclude this person may be an idiot. I could state here that I think you are an idiot. And no one could convince me otherwise since, hey, it is my opinion.


Which is more intolerant in your sage and unbiased opinion:

1. Calling an individual "idiot"?

or

2. Calling a group of people "hate-filled" and "less moral"?
 
2012-03-27 02:01:46 PM
MFL: qorkfiend Zimmerman's a registered Democrat? That is hilarious.

Wow.....just wow. All this after they spent all that money on the the president's new marketing gimick.


[www.drudgereport.com image 350x350]


Ahh yes the latest conspiracy from the blogosphere.
 
2012-03-27 02:02:25 PM
pxsteel: 2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

This, unfortunately, is true


Of course it is, Conservatives don't need their race-based hatred encouraged.

That just comes naturally to them.
 
2012-03-27 02:02:51 PM
badaboom: CPennypacker: badaboom: impaler: badaboom: Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.

Wrong again. Calling someone fat is a childish insult. Calling someone an idiot because their gross generalizations (a trait of a weak mind) in no way reflects reality (another trait of a weak mind), and that those generalizations are nothing but straw-man arguments (another trait of a weak mind), is just stating the obvious.

Calling someone "stupid" for being stupid isn't intolerance.

Yes it is. You can call the opinion stupid. But calling someone stupid is intolerant. Someone is not stupid just because you disagree with them.

Not everything is a point of opinion. Sometimes you are just wrong. If you are wrong and you act like you are right, there's a good chance you are an idiot. Idiot is not a minority or a protected class (quite the opposite in fact)

Who is and who is not an idiot can be subjective. Of course there are things like IQ tests that are more objective. If you wanted to prove someone was an idiot you would need objective evidence. Something everyone could agree on. A low IQ could be enough to prove someone is an idiot. In your opinion this person is an idiot. You are entitled to that. But it proves nothing. It is just your opinion. Now if he said something like 2+2=5 or that the moon is made of cheese, which we could both agree is factually wrong, we could conclude this person may be an idiot. I could state here that I think you are an idiot. And no one could convince me otherwise since, hey, it is my opinion.


Stop being intolerant, bigot.
 
2012-03-27 02:03:09 PM
It's weird. My friend is super conservative, I'm all the liberal and what I've noticed between his ranting and this blog is that there's a strong strain of paranoia in conservatism.

All liberals are secretly hateful and subversive; the government only APPEARS to want to help you through social programs; Obama is secretly an Islamic foreigner, etc.

Not saying it's exclusive. But holy fark that article is nothing but completely pointless paranoid conjecture. Thanks for the green light, mods.
 
2012-03-27 02:12:05 PM
Geotpf: DDT

Only you touched on this. If I had my CC with me, I'd have given you FT for a month...
 
2012-03-27 02:13:06 PM
Beluga Heights: It's weird. My friend is super conservative, I'm all the liberal and what I've noticed between his ranting and this blog is that there's a strong strain of paranoia in conservatism.

All liberals are secretly hateful and subversive; the government only APPEARS to want to help you through social programs; Obama is secretly an Islamic foreigner, etc.

Not saying it's exclusive. But holy fark that article is nothing but completely pointless paranoid conjecture. Thanks for the green light, mods.


Conservatives? Paranoid you say?

farm8.staticflickr.com

Git yer fluoride out of my ice cream Mandrake!

You hit the nail on the head there. Without fear and paranoia there wouldn't be enough conservatives left to fill a 737.
 
2012-03-27 02:13:34 PM
Beluga Heights: there's a strong strain of paranoia in conservatism.

I think that's sort of the point of traditionalism. It's the "tripping over themselves to see who can look more violently foolish" part that brings the sweet and sorrow entertainment.
 
2012-03-27 02:13:49 PM
smeegle: Ctrl-Alt-Del: soy_bomb being disingenuous? Say it ain't so!
Wow never saw that little gem before.
on a side point,,,,mmmm Lobster


Yea, not a bad spread.

/2008? That is my last miss-post? Awesome!
//stopped getting the NY Post around then
 
2012-03-27 02:13:50 PM
impaler: badaboom: Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.

Calling him fat is childish.
Calling him an idiot is just using words correctly. Idiot: an utterly foolish or senseless person.


Well, truth sorta does have a liberal bias in this case.
 
2012-03-27 02:17:17 PM
Ctrl-Alt-Del uses my image to bust soybomb yet again, Abraham Lincoln (via acefox1) tells me I'm awesome...this is now my favorite thread ever.
 
2012-03-27 02:20:14 PM
Beluga Heights: It's weird. My friend is super conservative, I'm all the liberal and what I've noticed between his ranting and this blog is that there's a strong strain of paranoia in conservatism.

It took you this blog to realize that
 
2012-03-27 02:20:18 PM
qorkfiend: 23

30) They don't play baseball
31) They're not good dancers
32) They don't wear sweaters
 
2012-03-27 02:20:54 PM
While I am socially liberal on some issues I don't consider myself a liberal. That being said, what a retarded pile of shiat that article was.
 
2012-03-27 02:21:06 PM
Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: CPennypacker: badaboom: impaler: badaboom: Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.

Wrong again. Calling someone fat is a childish insult. Calling someone an idiot because their gross generalizations (a trait of a weak mind) in no way reflects reality (another trait of a weak mind), and that those generalizations are nothing but straw-man arguments (another trait of a weak mind), is just stating the obvious.

Calling someone "stupid" for being stupid isn't intolerance.

Yes it is. You can call the opinion stupid. But calling someone stupid is intolerant. Someone is not stupid just because you disagree with them.

Not everything is a point of opinion. Sometimes you are just wrong. If you are wrong and you act like you are right, there's a good chance you are an idiot. Idiot is not a minority or a protected class (quite the opposite in fact)

Who is and who is not an idiot can be subjective. Of course there are things like IQ tests that are more objective. If you wanted to prove someone was an idiot you would need objective evidence. Something everyone could agree on. A low IQ could be enough to prove someone is an idiot. In your opinion this person is an idiot. You are entitled to that. But it proves nothing. It is just your opinion. Now if he said something like 2+2=5 or that the moon is made of cheese, which we could both agree is factually wrong, we could conclude this person may be an idiot. I could state here that I think you are an idiot. And no one could convince me otherwise since, hey, it is my opinion.

Which is more intolerant in your sage and unbiased opinion:

1. Calling an individual "idiot"?

or

2. Calling a group of people "hate-filled" and "less moral"?


They both are. But it does not matter. 'How can you call me intolerant/hate filled you fat idiot" is an ironic if not idiotic statement. You can simply state "I am not intolerant. I find your statement to be factually wrong. In fact I find your statement idiotic". See the difference?
 
2012-03-27 02:22:18 PM
Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.


Why won't liberals rejoice in the racist miltataristic plutocracy like we conservatives do?
 
2012-03-27 02:27:11 PM
badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: CPennypacker: badaboom: impaler: badaboom: Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.

Wrong again. Calling someone fat is a childish insult. Calling someone an idiot because their gross generalizations (a trait of a weak mind) in no way reflects reality (another trait of a weak mind), and that those generalizations are nothing but straw-man arguments (another trait of a weak mind), is just stating the obvious.

Calling someone "stupid" for being stupid isn't intolerance.

Yes it is. You can call the opinion stupid. But calling someone stupid is intolerant. Someone is not stupid just because you disagree with them.

Not everything is a point of opinion. Sometimes you are just wrong. If you are wrong and you act like you are right, there's a good chance you are an idiot. Idiot is not a minority or a protected class (quite the opposite in fact)

Who is and who is not an idiot can be subjective. Of course there are things like IQ tests that are more objective. If you wanted to prove someone was an idiot you would need objective evidence. Something everyone could agree on. A low IQ could be enough to prove someone is an idiot. In your opinion this person is an idiot. You are entitled to that. But it proves nothing. It is just your opinion. Now if he said something like 2+2=5 or that the moon is made of cheese, which we could both agree is factually wrong, we could conclude this person may be an idiot. I could state here that I think you are an idiot. And no one could convince me otherwise since, hey, it is my opinion.

Which is more intolerant in your sage and unbiased opinion:

1. Calling an individual "idiot"?

or

2. Calling a group of people "hate-filled" and "less moral"?

They both are. But it does not matter. 'How ...


So then you agree that the column is both intolerant and hypocritical. Great.
 
2012-03-27 02:27:27 PM
rufus-t-firefly: Ctrl-Alt-Del uses my image to bust soybomb yet again, Abraham Lincoln (via acefox1) tells me I'm awesome...this is now my favorite thread ever.

I think I found your profile pic on facebook

lolzombie.com
 
2012-03-27 02:27:41 PM
MFL: qorkfiend Zimmerman's a registered Democrat? That is hilarious.

Wow.....just wow. All this after they spent all that money on the the president's new marketing gimick.


[www.drudgereport.com image 350x350]


You too can look just like the President's son if he had one.
 
2012-03-27 02:28:07 PM
Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.


I believe the author is in the "pre-concrete operational" stage of psychological development. For him there is no difference between his personal experience and reality in general. Like when a kid can't fathom how you can be eating that broccoli he hates. In this guy's brain, "liberals hate me" is indistinguishable from "liberals hate everyone."

Most people mature past this stage when they're eight to ten years old. Unfortunately, some people never move past it.
 
2012-03-27 02:30:20 PM
Unfortunately, too many of you dickheads can vote. And you suck the garbage of either parties candidate. That, in and of itself, tells me you shouldn't be voting. You, in fact, should kill yourself. Too many liars - too many pieces of sh*t that suck it up and promote the garbage politician we have in office now. Dickheads.
 
2012-03-27 02:33:35 PM
impaler: badaboom: Someone is not stupid just because you disagree with them.

I know.

They're stupid be believing facts that are easily disproved.
They're stupid for engaging in fallacious reasoning.
They're stupid for not having the ability to use any sort of critical thinking skills.

If you want to say I'm intolerant of stupid people, go ahead. However, I'm not going to try to deny them any rights.


You are denying their right to be stupid when you put facts in their face. How dare you?
 
2012-03-27 02:35:37 PM
Philip Francis Queeg

What I "agree" with is that I can see how someone would have the opinion that the blogger is intolerant and hypocritical. Probably stupid to state the obvious which is basically, hey man it is your opinion.
 
2012-03-27 02:37:45 PM
NeverDrunk23: impaler: badaboom: Someone is not stupid just because you disagree with them.

I know.

They're stupid be believing facts that are easily disproved.
They're stupid for engaging in fallacious reasoning.
They're stupid for not having the ability to use any sort of critical thinking skills.

If you want to say I'm intolerant of stupid people, go ahead. However, I'm not going to try to deny them any rights.

You are denying their right to be stupid when you put facts in their face. How dare you?


You would be hard pressed to prove those accusations against anyone since they are full of opinion and conjecture.
 
2012-03-27 02:40:11 PM
clintster: qorkfiend: 23

30) They don't play baseball
31) They're not good dancers
32) They don't wear sweaters


33.) Liberals will make you toast, but they don't use any of these: butter, cheese, jelly.
 
2012-03-27 02:41:27 PM
badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg

What I "agree" with is that I can see how someone would have the opinion that the blogger is intolerant and hypocritical. Probably stupid to state the obvious which is basically, hey man it is your opinion.


I see. But you have no problem calling those who criticized him intolerant. Is that because you are intolerant and hypocritical?
 
2012-03-27 02:41:58 PM
soy_bomb: stopped getting the NY Post around then

Hey, even soy_bomb figures out when he's being lied to. Of course, that didn't keep him from regurgitating that story a day after it was debunked and retracte...but I'm sure he wasn't lying, just ignorant as fark.
 
2012-03-27 02:42:38 PM
pxsteel: Barfmaker:

How a moderate sees this

1) Most liberals are hateful people.

Both sides have hateful people, liberals just tend to be louder and can organize a sit in or march

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

This, unfortunately, is true

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.

wingnuts are just as farked up as moonbats. both are batshiat crazy

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.

This is true more often than not.

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

I see he has been reading fark politics tab


If you believe this, you are not a moderate.
 
2012-03-27 02:43:03 PM
Single most Uncomfortable truth about Liberals for this blogger:
There are more of them than conservatives.
 
2012-03-27 02:44:07 PM
Edsel: Bloody William: Please stop, elchip. There's enough stupid and crazy here to not have to feed it with this fake stuff anymore.

Huh? Did I miss something here?


Would anyone care to post the pic where elchip got caught replying with the wrong account?
 
2012-03-27 02:44:11 PM
qorkfiend: 33.) Liberals will make you toast, but they don't use any of these: butter, cheese, jelly.

They use vaaaassssssssseline. Vaaaaaaaaaaseliiiiine.
 
2012-03-27 02:45:19 PM
badaboom: impaler: badaboom: Hate and tolerance: Calling him fat. Calling him an idiot.

Calling him fat is childish.
Calling him an idiot is just using words correctly. Idiot: an utterly foolish or senseless person.

Calling someone fat or an idiot is a demonstration of intolerance. Whether or not you agree with him is not the point. It is ironic that one his points is that liberals are intolerant and the retort from many on this message board is shut up you fat idiot. Ironic.


No, discriminating against someone because they are fat or an idiot is intolerant. Calling them that is just being a jerk.
 
2012-03-27 02:45:43 PM
Mr. Coffee Nerves: The title "professional blogger" implies that someone is paying him to do this. I'm assuming it's like when my Grandma used to promise me $5 for every "A" I got on my report card in 4th Grade.

I got a nickel for bringing my Grandma's garbage cans back from the curb. That was a pretty good return on her money compared to what this guy probably gets paid to write his "HURRRR LIBS ARE EVIL HERE'S WHY! DURRRR" dreck.
 
2012-03-27 02:46:08 PM
DrippinBalls: Too many liars - too many pieces of sh*t that suck it up and promote the garbage politician we have in office now. Dickheads.

I've come to the conclusion that the Beach Boys song, Help Me Rhonda, is actually a lyrical entreat for a pity fark,,,,
and that your posted rant combined with your fark name is a cry for help in order to deal with your obsession with cocknballs.

It's gonna be okay, really.
 
2012-03-27 02:46:09 PM
Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg

What I "agree" with is that I can see how someone would have the opinion that the blogger is intolerant and hypocritical. Probably stupid to state the obvious which is basically, hey man it is your opinion.

I see. But you have no problem calling those who criticized him intolerant. Is that because you are intolerant and hypocritical?


Actually, I never called anyone intolerant or hypocritical. What I said was you can't say this: "How can you call me intolerant you fat idiot" without supporting the point of the person making the accusation. It is ironic.
 
2012-03-27 02:48:14 PM
smeegle: Daraymann: To be fair, Liberals are the real racists for being the first to bring race into everything

LOL, to be fair, generalizing is generally intellectually lazy.


Yet when liberals do it, it's somehow acceptable.
 
2012-03-27 02:48:54 PM
WinoRhino: qorkfiend: 33.) Liberals will make you toast, but they don't use any of these: butter, cheese, jelly.

They use vaaaassssssssseline. Vaaaaaaaaaaseliiiiine.


Hey now, it's good for you (new window).

A tycoon swore eating a spoonful a day helped him live to see 96 years

Bonus - article refers to Vaseline as "rod wax".

/giggity
 
2012-03-27 02:49:43 PM
Ablejack: Single most Uncomfortable truth about Liberals for this blogger:
There are more of them than conservatives.


citationplease.jpg
 
2012-03-27 02:50:27 PM
Ablejack: Single most Uncomfortable truth about Liberals for this blogger:
There are more of them than conservatives.


Not even close.

Link (new window)
 
2012-03-27 02:51:02 PM
Just remember folks, in America we do our damndest to make sure that every political opinion and thought is given equal time and consideration. Instead of just laughing some right out of the room. Why is it we can't just laugh some people right out of the room? Ahh, that equality thing.

Oh come on, there has to be some room in equality for "you're just an idiot, sit the hell down".
 
2012-03-27 02:52:38 PM
badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg

What I "agree" with is that I can see how someone would have the opinion that the blogger is intolerant and hypocritical. Probably stupid to state the obvious which is basically, hey man it is your opinion.

I see. But you have no problem calling those who criticized him intolerant. Is that because you are intolerant and hypocritical?

Actually, I never called anyone intolerant or hypocritical. What I said was you can't say this: "How can you call me intolerant you fat idiot" without supporting the point of the person making the accusation. It is ironic.


Wow, we're really making progress. The people who called him "fat" and "idiot:" are not intolerant in your opinion.

Tell us then how that would support the column's claim that liberals are intolerant. A claim which is itself intolerant, in your opinion, right?
 
2012-03-27 02:59:39 PM
Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg

What I "agree" with is that I can see how someone would have the opinion that the blogger is intolerant and hypocritical. Probably stupid to state the obvious which is basically, hey man it is your opinion.

I see. But you have no problem calling those who criticized him intolerant. Is that because you are intolerant and hypocritical?

Actually, I never called anyone intolerant or hypocritical. What I said was you can't say this: "How can you call me intolerant you fat idiot" without supporting the point of the person making the accusation. It is ironic.

Wow, we're really making progress. The people who called him "fat" and "idiot:" are not intolerant in your opinion.

Tell us then how that would support the column's claim that liberals are intolerant. A claim which is itself intolerant, in your opinion, right?


Got no opinion on the article or the author. Sorry. More of an opinion on discourse. I can see how one could argue that his discourse is intolerant. But that would be opinion. But to use the same discourse back is fruitless and lowers the person making the argument. Guess I am just sick of the "you are an idiot" therefore you have no worth or you should shut up argument.
 
2012-03-27 03:00:10 PM
Daraymann: Yet when liberals do it, it's somehow acceptable.

This article is about a conservative doing it but I would be happy to entertain any examples you care to put forth up against what is in the article, er blog or rant or whatever it is.
 
2012-03-27 03:03:25 PM
badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg

What I "agree" with is that I can see how someone would have the opinion that the blogger is intolerant and hypocritical. Probably stupid to state the obvious which is basically, hey man it is your opinion.

I see. But you have no problem calling those who criticized him intolerant. Is that because you are intolerant and hypocritical?

Actually, I never called anyone intolerant or hypocritical. What I said was you can't say this: "How can you call me intolerant you fat idiot" without supporting the point of the person making the accusation. It is ironic.

Wow, we're really making progress. The people who called him "fat" and "idiot:" are not intolerant in your opinion.

Tell us then how that would support the column's claim that liberals are intolerant. A claim which is itself intolerant, in your opinion, right?

Got no opinion on the article or the author. Sorry. More of an opinion on discourse. I can see how one could argue that his discourse is intolerant. But that would be opinion. But to use the same discourse back is fruitless and lowers the person making the argument. Guess I am just sick of the "you are an idiot" therefore you have no worth or you should shut up argument.


Gee, for a guy with no opinion you sure are posting a lot. I guess it's just your deep concerns about people being told to shut up that leads you hear to police what others say..
 
2012-03-27 03:03:53 PM
Mrtraveler01: Beluga Heights: It's weird. My friend is super conservative, I'm all the liberal and what I've noticed between his ranting and this blog is that there's a strong strain of paranoia in conservatism.

It took you this blog to realize that


Yeah. I tend to say obvious things to be safe.
 
2012-03-27 03:05:29 PM
I think the article is about right actually.

Libs who post theirt bigotted knee-jerk response only prove the author's point. How can people call themselves tolerant when they can't take a little criticism. Perhaps libs should try to do something more constructive with their lives, so they don't need to get so defensive. Get a job maybe?
 
2012-03-27 03:07:51 PM
THE GREAT NAME: I think the article is about right actually.

Libs who post theirt bigotted knee-jerk response only prove the author's point. How can people call themselves tolerant when they can't take a little criticism. Perhaps libs should try to do something more constructive with their lives, so they don't need to get so defensive. Get a job maybe?


You mean a job like "professional blogger"?
 
2012-03-27 03:07:58 PM
I disagree with this article. There's got to be more than 5.
 
2012-03-27 03:14:12 PM
Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg

What I "agree" with is that I can see how someone would have the opinion that the blogger is intolerant and hypocritical. Probably stupid to state the obvious which is basically, hey man it is your opinion.

I see. But you have no problem calling those who criticized him intolerant. Is that because you are intolerant and hypocritical?

Actually, I never called anyone intolerant or hypocritical. What I said was you can't say this: "How can you call me intolerant you fat idiot" without supporting the point of the person making the accusation. It is ironic.

Wow, we're really making progress. The people who called him "fat" and "idiot:" are not intolerant in your opinion.

Tell us then how that would support the column's claim that liberals are intolerant. A claim which is itself intolerant, in your opinion, right?

Got no opinion on the article or the author. Sorry. More of an opinion on discourse. I can see how one could argue that his discourse is intolerant. But that would be opinion. But to use the same discourse back is fruitless and lowers the person making the argument. Guess I am just sick of the "you are an idiot" therefore you have no worth or you should shut up argument.

Gee, for a guy with no opinion you sure are posting a lot. I guess it's just your deep concerns about people being told to shut up that leads you hear to police what others say..


Point to where I policed. Point to where I tell anyone to be quiet. All I did was point out irony.
 
2012-03-27 03:14:41 PM
How to test a statement for prejudice

Step one: Substitute another name or group of which you strongly approve in the allegedly prejudiced statement for the one which is the alleged victim of prejudice. The logic will remain the same. The statement and any implicit arguments based on it will remain the same. However you will be unable to assent to the TRUTH or SOUNDNESS of the new statement.

Five slightly less than random examples.

1) Most Jews are hateful people.
2) Jews do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most Jews are less moral than other people.
4) Most Jews don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.*
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

As you can see, substituting "Jew" for "Liberal" (as Anti-Semitic Conservatives have long done automatically in all statements about Liberalism), turns this list into an Anti-Semitic screed. Now, try it with the whole article, where the implicit arguments are made explicit.

It is 100% certain that the logic of this article is objectionable. The only people who can not object to the logic of the article when it is turned upon Jews rather than Liberals are people who have no problem with the logic of prejudice, and specifically, with the logic of Anti-Semitism, bigotry, racism, xenophobia, chauvinism, etc.

In other words, prejudiced Conservatives. Liberals may sometimes be prejudiced, but most are not. Liberals may sometimes be giving only lip-service to liberalism, but scratch them and they bleed conservatism or worse. But this is rare. I would not say any such thing about most Liberals, and most Liberals would not necessarily believe this of most Conservatives. Try substituting "conservative" for liberal throughout the article. See how much of that logic you can stomach.

What is more, each of the points made is a cherished conservative talking point which boils down to the schoolyard taunt: "I know you are, but what am I?" The logic is the logic of "He who smelled it, delt it." and other stupid statements.
 
2012-03-27 03:14:45 PM
In the words of Rick Santorum, "Bullshiat!"
 
2012-03-27 03:15:11 PM
ohdoublereally: I disagree with this article. There's got to be more than 5.

I rather agree. The inability of liberals to perceive the true disgustingness of hypocrisy would be another. Also their blind-spot for reckless concentration of power among moral elitists. Take the two together and it's hard to see how things like red holocaust (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes) could ever not happen under a regimen in which libs are able to run things.
 
2012-03-27 03:17:25 PM
Just think of the countless wars that have be waged & lives lost over the simple concept of Liberalism.

not to mention they're a bunch of sluts and whores.
 
2012-03-27 03:17:38 PM
brantgoose: How to test a statement for prejudice

Step one: Substitute another name or group of which you strongly approve in the allegedly prejudiced statement for the one which is the alleged victim of prejudice. The logic will remain the same. The statement and any implicit arguments based on it will remain the same. However you will be unable to assent to the TRUTH or SOUNDNESS of the new statement.

Five slightly less than random examples.

1) Most Jews are hateful people.
2) Jews do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.
3) Most Jews are less moral than other people.
4) Most Jews don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.*
5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.

As you can see, substituting "Jew" for "Liberal" (as Anti-Semitic Conservatives have long done automatically in all statements about Liberalism), turns this list into an Anti-Semitic screed. Now, try it with the whole article, where the implicit arguments are made explicit.

It is 100% certain that the logic of this article is objectionable. The only people who can not object to the logic of the article when it is turned upon Jews rather than Liberals are people who have no problem with the logic of prejudice, and specifically, with the logic of Anti-Semitism, bigotry, racism, xenophobia, chauvinism, etc.

In other words, prejudiced Conservatives. Liberals may sometimes be prejudiced, but most are not. Liberals may sometimes be giving only lip-service to liberalism, but scratch them and they bleed conservatism or worse. But this is rare. I would not say any such thing about most Liberals, and most Liberals would not necessarily believe this of most Conservatives. Try substituting "conservative" for liberal throughout the article. See how much of that logic you can stomach.

What is more, each of the points made is a cherished conservative talking point which boils down to the schoolyard taunt: "I know you are, but what am I?" The logic is the logic of "He who smelled it, delt it. ..
Generalizing bad.


Been covered, BG
 
2012-03-27 03:19:47 PM
badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg

What I "agree" with is that I can see how someone would have the opinion that the blogger is intolerant and hypocritical. Probably stupid to state the obvious which is basically, hey man it is your opinion.

I see. But you have no problem calling those who criticized him intolerant. Is that because you are intolerant and hypocritical?

Actually, I never called anyone intolerant or hypocritical. What I said was you can't say this: "How can you call me intolerant you fat idiot" without supporting the point of the person making the accusation. It is ironic.

Wow, we're really making progress. The people who called him "fat" and "idiot:" are not intolerant in your opinion.

Tell us then how that would support the column's claim that liberals are intolerant. A claim which is itself intolerant, in your opinion, right?

Got no opinion on the article or the author. Sorry. More of an opinion on discourse. I can see how one could argue that his discourse is intolerant. But that would be opinion. But to use the same discourse back is fruitless and lowers the person making the argument. Guess I am just sick of the "you are an idiot" therefore you have no worth or you should shut up argument.

Gee, for a guy with no opinion you sure are posting a lot. I guess it's just your deep concerns about people being told to shut up that leads you hear to police what others say..

Point to where I policed. Point to where I tell anyone to be quiet. All I did was point out irony.


Philip can't tell the difference between disagreement and censorship. The necessary neural pathways are missing from his brain to really understand such things, which is a shame, because it is only by mastering such distinctions we have managed to progress society beyond feudalism and dictatorial monarchy.

With such ideas as communism, socialism and climate-change theory, liberals like Phillip want to seek a route back to such a world -one in which he can relax and know he never needs to struggle to differentiate between disagreement and censorship ever again.
 
2012-03-27 03:19:58 PM
badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg

What I "agree" with is that I can see how someone would have the opinion that the blogger is intolerant and hypocritical. Probably stupid to state the obvious which is basically, hey man it is your opinion.

I see. But you have no problem calling those who criticized him intolerant. Is that because you are intolerant and hypocritical?

Actually, I never called anyone intolerant or hypocritical. What I said was you can't say this: "How can you call me intolerant you fat idiot" without supporting the point of the person making the accusation. It is ironic.

Wow, we're really making progress. The people who called him "fat" and "idiot:" are not intolerant in your opinion.

Tell us then how that would support the column's claim that liberals are intolerant. A claim which is itself intolerant, in your opinion, right?

Got no opinion on the article or the author. Sorry. More of an opinion on discourse. I can see how one could argue that his discourse is intolerant. But that would be opinion. But to use the same discourse back is fruitless and lowers the person making the argument. Guess I am just sick of the "you are an idiot" therefore you have no worth or you should shut up argument.

Gee, for a guy with no opinion you sure are posting a lot. I guess it's just your deep concerns about people being told to shut up that leads you hear to police what others say..

Point to where I policed. Point to where I tell anyone to be quiet. All I did was point out irony.


It doesn't sound like you are very tolerant of their statements now does it? I would think a bastion of tolerance like you would be supporting their statements whole heartedly and encouraging them to express themselves how ever they desire.
 
2012-03-27 03:20:02 PM
THE GREAT NAME: ohdoublereally: I disagree with this article. There's got to be more than 5.

I rather agree. The inability of liberals to perceive the true disgustingness of hypocrisy would be another. Also their blind-spot for reckless concentration of power among moral elitists. Take the two together and it's hard to see how things like red holocaust (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes) could ever not happen under a regimen in which libs are able to run things.


You're dead, Andrew, go away.
 
2012-03-27 03:20:33 PM
THE GREAT NAME: I think the article is about right actually.

Libs who post theirt bigotted knee-jerk response only prove the author's point. How can people call themselves tolerant when they can't take a little criticism. Perhaps libs should try to do something more constructive with their lives, so they don't need to get so defensive. Get a job maybe?


Gee I guess my intolerance of vaginal sonograms for women who have been raped, gotten pregnant and want an abortion is a knee jerk reaction.
I guess my intolerance of the FRC lies calling gay men pedophiles is a knee jerk reaction.
I guess my scoffing at Reagan counting Ketchup as a vegetable for school lunch programs is a knee jerk reaction.
I guess my intolerance of the RW religious community seeking to change the Constitution to reflect this country as a Christian nation is a knee jerk reaction.

Thank you for pointing out the error of my thinking. I'll just go in the corner and shut up and let the GOP extremists (now the norm) walk all over my rights as a woman and a gay citizen.

So sorry for speaking out against oppression from the religious right. How intolerant of me
to stand up for my rights.

Beat me with a pound of bibles for I have sinned against the almighty God fearing GOP.

FARK OFF
 
2012-03-27 03:20:34 PM
red5ish: This thread needs more of this sort of thing.
[img855.imageshack.us image 640x936]


That is an excellent picture, and somehow one of Aish that I haven't seen before.

:)
 
2012-03-27 03:20:40 PM
unyon: Allow me to summarize the logic here:

FTFA: Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred. It's amazing how much we still hear about Nazis and the KKK, even though they're both marginalized, nearly powerless groups of misfits and losers.


Later in TFA: because budding liberal fascists often try to shout them down... ....liberalism and fascism are merely different branches of the same tree.

Once more, with emphasis:

If the Nazi Party or the KKK had tried to come up with a system to keep people hating each other based on skin color, they couldn't have ever created anything as effective as the one liberals have now implemented.

And then the inevitable coop de gracie:

They're hate-filled people who are constantly accusing EVERYONE ELSE of behaving the way they do on a daily basis.

This has been yet another episode of conservative cognitive dissonance street theatre. We hope you enjoyed it. Good night, and drive safely.


Way late, but I love you.
 
2012-03-27 03:24:20 PM
Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg

What I "agree" with is that I can see how someone would have the opinion that the blogger is intolerant and hypocritical. Probably stupid to state the obvious which is basically, hey man it is your opinion.

I see. But you have no problem calling those who criticized him intolerant. Is that because you are intolerant and hypocritical?

Actually, I never called anyone intolerant or hypocritical. What I said was you can't say this: "How can you call me intolerant you fat idiot" without supporting the point of the person making the accusation. It is ironic.

Wow, we're really making progress. The people who called him "fat" and "idiot:" are not intolerant in your opinion.

Tell us then how that would support the column's claim that liberals are intolerant. A claim which is itself intolerant, in your opinion, right?

Got no opinion on the article or the author. Sorry. More of an opinion on discourse. I can see how one could argue that his discourse is intolerant. But that would be opinion. But to use the same discourse back is fruitless and lowers the person making the argument. Guess I am just sick of the "you are an idiot" therefore you have no worth or you should shut up argument.

Gee, for a guy with no opinion you sure are posting a lot. I guess it's just your deep concerns about people being told to shut up that leads you hear to police what others say..

Point to where I policed. Point to where I tell anyone to be quiet. All I did was point out irony.

It doesn't sound like you are very tolerant of their statements now does it? I would think a bastion of tolerance like you would be supporting their statements whole heartedly and encouraging them to express themselves how ever they desire.


I am neither tolerating or not tolerating their statements. They can express themselves however they wish.

But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.
 
2012-03-27 03:25:38 PM
qorkfiend: 33.) Liberals will make you toast, but they don't use any of these: butter, cheese, jelly.

That's okay.

dietsinreview.s3.amazonaws.com
 
2012-03-27 03:25:45 PM
smeegle: THE GREAT NAME: I think the article is about right actually.

Libs who post theirt bigotted knee-jerk response only prove the author's point. How can people call themselves tolerant when they can't take a little criticism. Perhaps libs should try to do something more constructive with their lives, so they don't need to get so defensive. Get a job maybe?

Gee I guess my intolerance of vaginal sonograms for women who have been raped, gotten pregnant and want an abortion is a knee jerk reaction.
I guess my intolerance of the FRC lies calling gay men pedophiles is a knee jerk reaction.
I guess my scoffing at Reagan counting Ketchup as a vegetable for school lunch programs is a knee jerk reaction.
I guess my intolerance of the RW religious community seeking to change the Constitution to reflect this country as a Christian nation is a knee jerk reaction.

Thank you for pointing out the error of my thinking. I'll just go in the corner and shut up and let the GOP extremists (now the norm) walk all over my rights as a woman and a gay citizen.

So sorry for speaking out against oppression from the religious right. How intolerant of me
to stand up for my rights.

Beat me with a pound of bibles for I have sinned against the almighty God fearing GOP.

FARK OFF


Actually I disagree with those sonograms too. But the rest of it is just you railing against free speech and democratically accountable politics. So yes, in fact you are intolerant.
 
2012-03-27 03:26:48 PM
badaboom: But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.

Still not getting how making fun of fat idiots is intolerant.
 
2012-03-27 03:28:59 PM
blackminded:
This has been yet another episode of conservative cognitive dissonance street theatre. We hope you enjoyed it. Good night, and drive safely.


Q. How do you provoke cognitive dissonance in a lib?

A. Tell him that 2+2=4 is oppressing the victims in society, and that the only fair way is for it to be 5. Then put him in charge of the economy. Then RUN!!
 
2012-03-27 03:29:18 PM
1) Say blatently racist, sexist, and homophobic things.
2) Try to pass laws based on it.
3) Get butthurt when people call you out.
4) ????
5) Profit\Become the GOP.
 
2012-03-27 03:30:14 PM
badaboom: I am neither tolerating or not tolerating their statements. They can express themselves however they wish.

But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.



I'm sorry, how are their criticisms more intolerant than yours of them? Did they tell the author to shut up any more than you told them to?
 
2012-03-27 03:33:06 PM
Halli: badaboom: But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.

Still not getting how making fun of fat idiots is intolerant.


What does it matter what a person's body habitus is? If it does not matter why call them fat? What is trying to be accomplished?
 
2012-03-27 03:33:37 PM
red5ish: This thread needs more of this sort of thing.
[img855.imageshack.us image 640x936]


i1136.photobucket.com
 
2012-03-27 03:33:42 PM
Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: I am neither tolerating or not tolerating their statements. They can express themselves however they wish.

But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.


I'm sorry, how are their criticisms more intolerant than yours of them? Did they tell the author to shut up any more than you told them to?


Ha ha I love watching liberal phillip try to control the discussion as he fails to hide his own intolerance. You've lost the argument phillip, give it up!
 
2012-03-27 03:34:52 PM
badaboom: Halli: badaboom: But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.

Still not getting how making fun of fat idiots is intolerant.

What does it matter what a person's body habitus is? If it does not matter why call them fat? What is trying to be accomplished?


Because mocking fat people is funny? Especially annoying fat bloggers.
 
2012-03-27 03:35:33 PM
I was going to post the whole article with "Liberals" replaced by "Jews". But who would want to read such a rant?

I will content myself with one brief observation: "Liberals are the new Jews for Southern Crackers and Loony Tune Religionists." Just as the Republicans are the New Southern Democrats from before Nixon's Southern Strategy. And like the Bourbons, they forget nothing and they learn nothing.

It wasn't a long march from hating the Jews to hating their liberal non-Jewish defenders. It wasn't a long march from the equation "Jews = Commies" to "Liberals = Commies", or from "Commies = Nazis" to "Liberals = Nazis" once the equivalencies were established.

Everything old is new again, under New Management or New Names.

Just as the old Cold Warriors who saw Commies behind every movement of social, political or environmental protest have recycled their venom against Liberals and Environmentists, and New Agers, etc., they've recycled their prejudices against Jews and Africans and other groups against Liberals.

Same old, same old, as our African American cousins were wont to say until we took it up into the mainstream vernacular and spoiled it for them.
 
2012-03-27 03:36:14 PM
Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.


Do you hate reading things that challenge your view?
 
2012-03-27 03:36:33 PM
Halli: badaboom: Halli: badaboom: But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.

Still not getting how making fun of fat idiots is intolerant.

What does it matter what a person's body habitus is? If it does not matter why call them fat? What is trying to be accomplished?

Because mocking fat people is funny? Especially annoying fat bloggers.


Liberals never tolerate the mocking of liberals. For them, what is morally correct depends on whether you are one of them. I guess that's what they mean by moral relativism.
 
2012-03-27 03:37:39 PM
Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: I am neither tolerating or not tolerating their statements. They can express themselves however they wish.

But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.


I'm sorry, how are their criticisms more intolerant than yours of them? Did they tell the author to shut up any more than you told them to?



How? I offered up a better way to make the same statement which is "I disagree with your points".

You can not see the difference between: " I disagree with you because you are a fat idiot" and "I disagree with you.". You can not see how ironic that the blogger is calling the left intolerant and hateful and the response is in of it self intolerant and hateful? The only way you would not see it is if you did not think calling someone fat or an idiot is a sign of intolerance. I do. No where did I say shut up. In fact, I say go ahead state your opinion. But if you do it in this manner you fail to make your point.
 
2012-03-27 03:38:01 PM
THE GREAT NAME: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: I am neither tolerating or not tolerating their statements. They can express themselves however they wish.

But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.


I'm sorry, how are their criticisms more intolerant than yours of them? Did they tell the author to shut up any more than you told them to?

Ha ha I love watching liberal phillip try to control the discussion as he fails to hide his own intolerance. You've lost the argument phillip, give it up!


Are you being intolerant of my posts? You Liberal!
 
2012-03-27 03:38:15 PM
THE GREAT NAME: But the rest of it is just you railing against free speech

No I rail against legislative activity. There is a difference but you are not willing to concede to the FACT that the GOP in it's collective form has moved against gays and women in the name of religion. So yes, I am intolerant of that.
 
2012-03-27 03:39:54 PM
Halli: badaboom: Halli: badaboom: But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.

Still not getting how making fun of fat idiots is intolerant.

What does it matter what a person's body habitus is? If it does not matter why call them fat? What is trying to be accomplished?

Because mocking fat people is funny? Especially annoying fat bloggers.


But here it is more than just a way to get a laugh. It is a way to assign stereotypes against someone who is fat. I mean we all that fat people are stupid, have no self control, smell bad etc. And because of this we can rightly dismiss anything they say. Right?
 
2012-03-27 03:40:27 PM
THE GREAT NAME: Halli: badaboom: Halli: badaboom: But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.

Still not getting how making fun of fat idiots is intolerant.

What does it matter what a person's body habitus is? If it does not matter why call them fat? What is trying to be accomplished?

Because mocking fat people is funny? Especially annoying fat bloggers.

Liberals never tolerate the mocking of liberals. For them, what is morally correct depends on whether you are one of them. I guess that's what they mean by moral relativism.


Meh 1/10 for this thread. They just don't make them like they used to.
 
2012-03-27 03:41:44 PM
badaboom: Halli: badaboom: Halli: badaboom: But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.

Still not getting how making fun of fat idiots is intolerant.

What does it matter what a person's body habitus is? If it does not matter why call them fat? What is trying to be accomplished?

Because mocking fat people is funny? Especially annoying fat bloggers.

But here it is more than just a way to get a laugh. It is a way to assign stereotypes against someone who is fat. I mean we all that fat people are stupid, have no self control, smell bad etc. And because of this we can rightly dismiss anything they say. Right?


Well in the case of this guy, yes. But I do find it funny when people try to be the PC police. Did Sarah Palin also tell you that calling people retards was bad?
 
2012-03-27 03:42:58 PM
badaboom: What does it matter what a person's body habitus is? If it does not matter why call them fat? What is trying to be accomplished?

I was always raised to follow the golden rule. You treat people how they would want to be treated.

This fat, idiot blogger is sublime in his intolerance, ergo he wishes to be treated with intolerance in kind.

Those who call him a fat idiot are not being ironic or hypocritical, they are simply complying with his wishes.
 
2012-03-27 03:44:11 PM
brantgoose: I was going to post the whole article with "Liberals" replaced by "Jews". But who would want to read such a rant?

I will content myself with one brief observation: "Liberals are the new Jews for Southern Crackers and Loony Tune Religionists." Just as the Republicans are the New Southern Democrats from before Nixon's Southern Strategy. And like the Bourbons, they forget nothing and they learn nothing.

It wasn't a long march from hating the Jews to hating their liberal non-Jewish defenders. It wasn't a long march from the equation "Jews = Commies" to "Liberals = Commies", or from "Commies = Nazis" to "Liberals = Nazis" once the equivalencies were established.

Everything old is new again, under New Management or New Names.

Just as the old Cold Warriors who saw Commies behind every movement of social, political or environmental protest have recycled their venom against Liberals and Environmentists, and New Agers, etc., they've recycled their prejudices against Jews and Africans and other groups against Liberals.

Same old, same old, as our African American cousins were wont to say until we took it up into the mainstream vernacular and spoiled it for them.


Nice try, but your revisionism does not fool THE GREAT NAME. It has always been the liberals who hate the Jews. They associate Jews with such hateful things as progress and economic success. The liberals have always wanted to return to more primitive times then as now.

Liberals invented anti-racism to distance themselves from the holocaust. Once that aim was met, they redefined anti-racism to not apply to antisemitism. And then the Jew-hating was OK again for libs. Libs also hate Christians, and would hate the Muslims too if they stopped persecuting Jews (a lib's enemy's enemy is their friend, no matter how intolerant).
 
2012-03-27 03:44:34 PM
badaboom: But here it is more than just a way to get a laugh. It is a way to assign stereotypes against someone who is fat. I mean we all that fat people are stupid, have no self control, smell bad etc. And because of this we can rightly dismiss anything they say. Right?

You sound Fat.
 
2012-03-27 03:46:17 PM
AndEhBus: Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.

Do you hate reading things that challenge your view?


I read your profile. It challenged my view that you're a sane person.
 
2012-03-27 03:47:02 PM
badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: I am neither tolerating or not tolerating their statements. They can express themselves however they wish.

But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.


I'm sorry, how are their criticisms more intolerant than yours of them? Did they tell the author to shut up any more than you told them to?


How? I offered up a better way to make the same statement which is "I disagree with your points".

You can not see the difference between: " I disagree with you because you are a fat idiot" and "I disagree with you.". You can not see how ironic that the blogger is calling the left intolerant and hateful and the response is in of it self intolerant and hateful? The only way you would not see it is if you did not think calling someone fat or an idiot is a sign of intolerance. I do. No where did I say shut up. In fact, I say go ahead state your opinion. But if you do it in this manner you fail to make your point.


They didn't say shut up either. They point out that the author is fat and an idiot, in the very same manner that the columnist claimed that liberals are intolerant and hate-filled, and in the same manner that you pointed out the intolerance in their statements. Now were your criticisms the only tolerant criticisms leveled in that chain?
 
2012-03-27 03:48:33 PM
smeegle: THE GREAT NAME: But the rest of it is just you railing against free speech

No I rail against legislative activity. There is a difference but you are not willing to concede to the FACT that the GOP in it's collective form has moved against gays and women in the name of religion. So yes, I am intolerant of that.


I like how your FACTs are so important they must be CAPITALIZED. Is there a different between a fact and a FACT. Are FACTs really LIB FACTS - i.e. some BS you read on a lib blog? Sorry that's lib BLOG right?
 
2012-03-27 03:53:44 PM
THE GREAT NAME: ow your FACTs are so important they must be CAPITALIZED. Is there a different between a fact and a FACT. Are FACTs really LIB FACTS - i.e. some BS you read on a lib blog? Sorry that's lib BLOG right?

I emphasized "fact" to make a point because these days the conservative Right seems to be frightened of them. Yes, facts are important.
I don't read Lib blogs, I read legislation, I read what the right proposes and passes. Those are facts and you cannot escape them no matter how much your desperately try to mock my post.
How much legislation have you read lately?
What factual evidence do have to back up your assertion that facts are not as important as the ranting of some RW blogger.
See how that works?
 
2012-03-27 03:53:58 PM
THE GREAT NAME: smeegle: THE GREAT NAME: But the rest of it is just you railing against free speech

No I rail against legislative activity. There is a difference but you are not willing to concede to the FACT that the GOP in it's collective form has moved against gays and women in the name of religion. So yes, I am intolerant of that.

I like how your FACTs are so important they must be CAPITALIZED. Is there a different between a fact and a FACT. Are FACTs really LIB FACTS - i.e. some BS you read on a lib blog? Sorry that's lib BLOG right?


Jesus, you're boring even by the standards of Fark's right-wing troll community.
 
2012-03-27 03:56:28 PM
THE GREAT NAME

Nice try, but your revisionism does not fool THE GREAT NAME. It has always been the liberals who hate the Jews. They associate Jews with such hateful things as progress and economic success. The liberals have always wanted to return to more primitive times then as now.

Liberals invented anti-racism to distance themselves from the holocaust. Once that aim was met, they redefined anti-racism to not apply to antisemitism. And then the Jew-hating was OK again for libs. Libs also hate Christians, and would hate the Muslims too if they stopped persecuting Jews (a lib's enemy's enemy is their friend, no matter how intolerant).


Dude (unless you're Anne Coulter or Michelle Malkin) you're seriously as delusional as Victoria Jackson.

/oh wait, is that you, Victoria?
 
2012-03-27 03:56:30 PM
A Dark Evil Omen: THE GREAT NAME: smeegle: THE GREAT NAME: But the rest of it is just you railing against free speech

No I rail against legislative activity. There is a difference but you are not willing to concede to the FACT that the GOP in it's collective form has moved against gays and women in the name of religion. So yes, I am intolerant of that.

I like how your FACTs are so important they must be CAPITALIZED. Is there a different between a fact and a FACT. Are FACTs really LIB FACTS - i.e. some BS you read on a lib blog? Sorry that's lib BLOG right?

Jesus, you're boring even by the standards of Fark's right-wing troll community.


I see from your profile you are one of those fake "left libertarians". You know that's a contradiction in terms right?
 
2012-03-27 04:00:53 PM
THE GREAT NAME: t legislative activity

So do you want to discuss legislative activity or do you want to continue being dull and void of any real intelligent discourse?
You choice, show your ass or have a real debate.
 
2012-03-27 04:20:08 PM
I can't believe you guys made 11page about this parody of a blog.
Must have been some high intensity trolling going on here
 
2012-03-27 04:27:47 PM
On-Off: I can't believe you guys made 11page about this parody of a blog.
Must have been some high intensity trolling going on here


I know right. Farkers, we be a silly bunch sometimes.
 
2012-03-27 04:29:02 PM
On-Off: I can't believe you guys made 11page about this parody of a blog.
Must have been some high intensity trolling going on here


It's being too generous to call it parody, it is what many conservatives believe. The fact that this same rhetoric has been selling ads for decades now is evidence of that. No generalization needed.
 
2012-03-27 04:38:08 PM
Petit_Merdeux: [projector.jpg]
 
2012-03-27 04:42:43 PM
SkinnyHead: Oh hello, Flab. The article portrays liberals as hateful and intolerant people with fragile self esteem who talk liberal only so they can look cool in front of others and feel good about themselves. Those are generalizations, of course. Not every liberal can be described that way. But I'll keep an eye on this thread, because I think that most of the comments coming from liberals will confirm the major premise of the article.

Or you're just hoping somebody does your trolling for you.
 
2012-03-27 04:49:39 PM
Four ACTUAL uncomfortable truths about liberals (which may not be exclusive to liberals):

1) We're a bunch of apathetic lazy farks that don't get off of our asses and protest things the way they should be protested in the numbers that should be protesting.

2) We have a really hard time focusing on just one issue. Every time we do get riled up about something, the discussion always fragments into a million little side issues and then the media portrays us as a bunch of stupid asses that doesn't know what the fark we're talking about. The media isn't looking for truth - they're looking for the freakshow. And there's always some freaks in the bunch willing to give them what they're looking for.

3) We've let the conservatives railroad the definition of "liberal" for far too long. There's a lot of Americans out there that are liberal leaning but they don't identify as "liberal" because they don't want to be identified as what conservatives have painted the word "liberal" as.

4) When we do manage to get actual liberal politicians to run for office, we don't rally around them / donate to them nearly as much as we should. We could learn a lot from the Teabaggers on this one. Imagine what our country would be like if we went out and pushed a bunch of true hard-core liberals into office like the Teabaggers did in 2010.
 
2012-03-27 04:58:33 PM
impaler: I know.

They're stupid befor believing facts that are easily disproved.
They're stupid for engaging in fallacious reasoning.
They're stupid for not having the ability to use any sort of critical thinking skills.

If you want to say I'm intolerant of stupid people, go ahead. However, I'm not going to try to deny them any rights.


Intolerance of intolerance is not bigotry. Being intolerant of intolerance means you are intolerant of the lack of tolerance - it's like being intolerant of somebody swearing loud in public, not like being intolerant of a person sitting in the front of a bus.

You make da good points. I really just wanted to say "this". Probably should have.

/also FTFY
//peeve, sorry
 
2012-03-27 04:58:46 PM
Actually, I see two truths here:

1. Townhall is a bunch of right-wing whargarbl
2. There are 523 comments here

I'm guessing (correctly) that none of the supposed 5 items are worth my time, or frankly, any of yours.
 
2012-03-27 05:03:12 PM
Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: Philip Francis Queeg: badaboom: I am neither tolerating or not tolerating their statements. They can express themselves however they wish.

But I guess you can not see the irony of calling someone a fat idiot to prove that you yourself are not intolerant. Sorry. I tried.


I'm sorry, how are their criticisms more intolerant than yours of them? Did they tell the author to shut up any more than you told them to?


How? I offered up a better way to make the same statement which is "I disagree with your points".

You can not see the difference between: " I disagree with you because you are a fat idiot" and "I disagree with you.". You can not see how ironic that the blogger is calling the left intolerant and hateful and the response is in of it self intolerant and hateful? The only way you would not see it is if you did not think calling someone fat or an idiot is a sign of intolerance. I do. No where did I say shut up. In fact, I say go ahead state your opinion. But if you do it in this manner you fail to make your point.

They didn't say shut up either. They point out that the author is fat and an idiot, in the very same manner that the columnist claimed that liberals are intolerant and hate-filled, and in the same manner that you pointed out the intolerance in their statements. Now were your criticisms the only tolerant criticisms leveled in that chain?


Yes
 
2012-03-27 05:03:30 PM
AndEhBus: Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.

Do you hate reading things that challenge your view?


I'm sorry. I don't find generalizing, hyperbolic bullshiat very challenging.
 
2012-03-27 05:09:00 PM
I know it's hard to imagine, but once upon a time, there were genuine conservative intellectuals. People like William F. Buckley, Russell Kirk, Irving Kristol, James Burnham, and Milton Friedman. You might disagree with their analyses and conclusions, but you wouldn't read something by them and wonder if they might be psychotic or mildly retarded.
 
2012-03-27 05:13:48 PM
badaboom: Guess I am just sick of the "you are an idiot" therefore you have no worth or you should shut up argument.

Most people here are saying "your argument has no worth, therefore you're an idiot."
 
2012-03-27 05:17:43 PM
impaler: badaboom: Guess I am just sick of the "you are an idiot" therefore you have no worth or you should shut up argument.

Most people here are saying "your argument has no worth, therefore you're an idiot."


Same thing. Here the author argues politics. Yet if he was writing about who the greatest drummer was in the world, and his opinion was different than yours, would you call him an idiot because you are 100% sure he has no idea what he is talking about when it comes to drummers?
 
2012-03-27 05:26:01 PM
badaboom: Most people here are saying "your argument has no worth, therefore you're an idiot."

Same thing. Here the author argues politics. Yet if he was writing about who the greatest drummer was in the world, and his opinion was different than yours, would you call him an idiot because you are 100% sure he has no idea what he is talking about when it comes to drummers?


No, it is not the same thing. Determining that someone is an idiot for using gross generalization and straw-man arguments, i.e. fallacious reasoning, is not the same as "you disagree with my opinions, therefore you're an idiot."

Judging an individual to be an idiot, based on that individuals actions, is not the same as judging the actions of an entire group based off of imagined slights.

Judging "the greatest drummer in the world" is almost an entirely subjective opinion. In no way does it compare.
 
2012-03-27 05:30:07 PM
impaler: Judging "the greatest drummer in the world" is almost an entirely subjective opinion. In no way does it compare.

Let me make this more clear.

If two people were arguing whether "John Bonham" or "Neil Peart" was the best drummer ever, neither one could rightly claim that the other one was stupid. It's subjective opinion. If a third person jumped in and "Stevie Ray Vaughan" was the best drummer ever, they could both rightly claim that guy was an idiot.
 
2012-03-27 05:38:45 PM
impaler: impaler: Judging "the greatest drummer in the world" is almost an entirely subjective opinion. In no way does it compare.

Let me make this more clear.

If two people were arguing whether "John Bonham" or "Neil Peart" was the best drummer ever, neither one could rightly claim that the other one was stupid. It's subjective opinion. If a third person jumped in and "Stevie Ray Vaughan" was the best drummer ever, they could both rightly claim that guy was an idiot.


Ha! That is where you are wrong!

img4.imageshack.us
 
2012-03-27 06:00:48 PM
Skeptos: I know it's hard to imagine, but once upon a time, there were genuine conservative intellectuals. People like William F. Buckley, Russell Kirk, Irving Kristol, James Burnham, and Milton Friedman. You might disagree with their analyses and conclusions, but you wouldn't read something by them and wonder if they might be psychotic or mildly retarded.

This was a primitive stage in the development of the modern conservative. These weak intellectuals never learned the importance of shutting off debate.

You don't win by having the most conclusive argument: that's a quaint notion. You win by getting the other side to be totally incapable of responding. And i you have to stoop to the level of a monomaniac sociopath with the reasoning skills of a 4yo, that's what you do.
 
2012-03-27 06:09:38 PM
img201.imageshack.us
 
2012-03-27 06:13:58 PM
Take everything that blog says and reverse it.
 
2012-03-27 06:25:23 PM
Granted, I know a pretty intolerant "liberal," but that anecdote is all I have to support this BS "article."
 
2012-03-27 06:29:43 PM
2wolves: Jake Havechek: Farking retard Hawkins didn't close his bold html tag.

God hates tags.


And I am done with the internet for the day. Thank you for that.

[slowclap.gif]
 
2012-03-27 06:38:57 PM
My favorite is the race stuff. I love how conservatives are constantly like "Wha??? What racism??? There's no racism! Liberals make it up!!!" and then you see something like the Trayvon Martin case, and conservatives are actually MORE outraged over the outrage than the outraged people are over the killing.

"Oh sure!!! Blame the white people like always!!!! That's what you people ALWAYS do!!! Maybe if the black boy wasn't walking around at night wearing casual clothes he might not have got shot!!!! Why didn't he just run??? Why did he fight the white guy who had no authority yet stalked and chased him with a gun?!?!?! What about this other case where the white person got shot by the black guy (who was promptly arrested, charged, tried, and convicted) and nobody cared enough to get on the national news for that!!!! It's always the race card with those people!!!"

Poor, poor put upon white Christian conservatives... Won't people ever stop oppressing them?
 
2012-03-27 07:12:03 PM
Mrs.Sharpier: Cythraul: Mrs.Sharpier: [i96.photobucket.com image 640x455]

exhibit A:

that necklace.

Time to play: Which one of these is more attractive?

I'm definitely going for the one on the right.

Grover Norquist ? Ya, he's attractive.


I can practically smell the misery radiating from him right though the jpeg.
 
2012-03-27 07:54:26 PM
When I want to know about liberals, I ask TownHall.
 
2012-03-27 08:10:29 PM
Cythraul: Jake Havechek: BillCo: Seems spot on to me.

It would, to you.

Is this person a troll, or a true believer?


He's a true troll....
 
2012-03-27 08:37:48 PM
smeegle: THE GREAT NAME: But the rest of it is just you railing against free speech

No I rail against legislative activity. There is a difference but you are not willing to concede to the FACT that the GOP in it's collective form has moved against gays and women in the name of religion. So yes, I am intolerant of that.


THE GREAT NAME: smeegle: THE GREAT NAME: I think the article is about right actually.

Libs who post theirt bigotted knee-jerk response only prove the author's point. How can people call themselves tolerant when they can't take a little criticism. Perhaps libs should try to do something more constructive with their lives, so they don't need to get so defensive. Get a job maybe?

Gee I guess my intolerance of vaginal sonograms for women who have been raped, gotten pregnant and want an abortion is a knee jerk reaction.
I guess my intolerance of the FRC lies calling gay men pedophiles is a knee jerk reaction.
I guess my scoffing at Reagan counting Ketchup as a vegetable for school lunch programs is a knee jerk reaction.
I guess my intolerance of the RW religious community seeking to change the Constitution to reflect this country as a Christian nation is a knee jerk reaction.

Thank you for pointing out the error of my thinking. I'll just go in the corner and shut up and let the GOP extremists (now the norm) walk all over my rights as a woman and a gay citizen.

So sorry for speaking out against oppression from the religious right. How intolerant of me
to stand up for my rights.

Beat me with a pound of bibles for I have sinned against the almighty God fearing GOP.

FARK OFF

Actually I disagree with those sonograms too. But the rest of it is just you railing against free speech and democratically accountable politics. So yes, in fact you are intolerant.


One SHOULD be intolerant of evil.
The transvaginal ultrasound is an attempt to eliminate personal autonomy.
The FRC is pure character assassination in attempt to dehumanize a specific group.
The RW bastards are also attempting to eliminate personal autonomy, and attempting to dehumanize anybody who isn't them.
You're DAMN RIGHT I'M INTOLERANT OF THAT SHIAT
Fark you.
 
2012-03-27 08:38:33 PM
You know how you can tell there's some truth to what he's written? as of 8:28pm there are over 542 comments about his article.

If it didn't prick your conscience at some level, you would have harrumphed to your self and moved on to read the next headline, but nooo, You couldn't possibly let somebody else get the last word in and make you feel bad about the world you live in.

That should have been the 6th point of the article.
 
2012-03-27 08:45:35 PM
I was actually kinda on-board the argument until this one:

"Most liberals are less moral than other people. You won't see liberals being accused of being hypocritical if it turns out that they don't have "good family values," commit adultery, or don't live up to their Christian beliefs because they don't really buy into any of those things. Liberals incessantly attack the church and they seldom talk about morals because if they have no morals, then no one can ever accuse them of being hypocrites."

Dear author, being moral isn't about what you say. It isn't about what you preach. It isn't about what church you attend or what religious label you put on yourselves.

It's about what you do.

If conservatives and liberals commit adultery at the same rates of one another, that makes them equally immoral. If conservatives claim to be something else and do it anyway, now they're both immoral and hypocrites. That makes them worse than liberals on this point, however slightly.
 
2012-03-27 08:49:06 PM
kyrg: You know how you can tell there's some truth to what he's written? as of 8:28pm there are over 542 comments about his article.

If it didn't prick your conscience at some level, you would have harrumphed to your self and moved on to read the next headline, but nooo, You couldn't possibly let somebody else get the last word in and make you feel bad about the world you live in.

That should have been the 6th point of the article.




Yeah, which is exactly why trolling never ever works... When people post obviously stupid shiat no one ever responds at all. It's incontrovertible human nature.
 
2012-03-27 09:14:18 PM
kyrg: You know how you can tell there's some truth to what he's written? as of 8:28pm there are over 542 comments about his article.

If it didn't prick your conscience at some level, you would have harrumphed to your self and moved on to read the next headline, but nooo, You couldn't possibly let somebody else get the last word in and make you feel bad about the world you live in.

That should have been the 6th point of the article.


You have a lot to learn about human nature, mate.
Either that, or you're a particularly shiat troll.
 
2012-03-27 09:22:12 PM
kyrg: You know how you can tell there's some truth to what he's written? as of 8:28pm there are over 542 comments about his article.

Another possibility is that we're tired of conservatives saying, "Ya know what's wrong with liberals?"

Like they have any goddamn place in this world to criticize someone else's political leanings. Their conservative platform has gone completely off the rails, and yet they have time to try to criticize others?

Ya know what's wrong with conservatives? They totally forgot what it means to be an actual conservative. They are now just a bunch of lunatics pretending to be somebody that we should listen to. And it's really hurting our country as a whole. So get your own house in order before you start trying to diagnose other people's problems.
 
2012-03-27 09:30:52 PM
Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.


img0.fark.net

A reliable indicator of "right-wing derp inside".

/NGTRTFA
 
2012-03-27 10:05:12 PM
I can't believe that article got 500+ posts. Wow.

I read most of it, it sounds like it was written by Rush.
 
2012-03-27 10:18:37 PM
jcooli09: I can't believe that article got 500+ posts. Wow.

I read most of it, it sounds like it was written by Rush.


Hey, now. That's insulting to Rush. I hate Limpdong too, but even I have my limits.
 
2012-03-27 10:20:11 PM
1) Most liberals are hateful people.
We dislike (or "hate") the willfully ignorant and stupid.
We dislike (or "hate") those who just can't leave others alone to live their lives, as long as that process hurts no one else.
We dislike (or "hate") those who would rather see the advancement of humankind halted to suit their own backwards way of thinking.
We dislike (or "hate") those who want to make everyone else believe as they do rather than accept that this will never happen and run their own lives as they see fit.

2) Liberals do more than any other group to encourage race-based hatred.

We make sure those that perpetrate racist acts are dragged into the sunlight for all to see. I'm guessing this person is like the good old boys in the south during the 50's and 60's who b*tched about the NAACP and other "agitators" stirring up their "good nigras" with ideas about voting and equality and other garbage.

3) Most liberals are less moral than other people.
If by "moral" you mean "minds other peoples business" then I'll be that immoral sob. Morality has to do with how you treat others, not how loudly you can scream from your soapbox that you luvs yourself some Jebus while not giving a flying fark about what he taught.

4) Most liberals don't care if the policies they advocate work or not.
Fail. We indeed do care if they work or not, and if it wasn't for assholes like you more of those policies would work.

5) Most liberals are extremely intolerant.
Intolerant of racism?
Intolerant of sexism?
Intolerant of ageism?
Intolerant of greed?
Intolerant of liars?
Intolerant of wars and killing?
Intolerant of willful ignorance?
Intolerant of stupidity?

Yes. Yes we are.
 
2012-03-27 10:39:23 PM
Five uncomfortable truths about liberals
1. They have bad breath
2. They come from the future, the year 2030.
3. They are living human tissue wrapped over a metal endoskeleton.
4. They are looking for Sarah and John Connor
5. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.

/and yet my list is more accurate
//*beep*
 
2012-03-27 10:50:31 PM
'Liberals', ignoring that it becomes a dirty word and should not be, do have weaknesses as a whole, as do conservatives. Even though it make reality simple for the sake of political drama.

But why do these lists from conservative trolls always seem more like projection when looked at honestly.

/I guess I blame Turd Blossom and his who 'make your own weakess into your strength through projection' original idea redone done badly.
 
2012-03-27 10:55:08 PM
I see this fat kid's horrible sausage-lipped visage, and in my mind I can hear three billion vaginas slamming shut.

/hateful liberal
//honest liberal
 
2012-03-27 11:02:31 PM
I agree with him that we Liberals are less moral people.

Personally, I think ethics are more important than morals. Morals systems are based on simple rules. Ethics are based on an entire way of thinking about the world. In an ethical system, you don't have to forbid theft if you already believe that humans have the right to maintain their own possessions, and you don't have to forbid murder if you believe in the importance of individual human beings and how precious and special they are as sentient beings.

Here's an example: A highly MORAL person I work with was aghast that I would bring back my receipt because a store forgot to charge me for an item worth about 20 dollars. I argued that if I want to own the item, I have to pay for it. If they overcharged me, I would certainly go back to remedy it, so since they undercharged me, I must treat the situation with the same care. He argued that it wasn't theft because they allowed me to leave with the item and they didn't KNOW they hadn't charged me. Well, I know, and that's enough. He thinks I'm crazy. I think that if I want to demand respect for my ownership of things, I must first consistently apply that respect towards others. I find it inconsistent to add to the theft and dishonesty of the world when it benefits me, and then bemoan the exact same problem when I am the victim of it.
 
2012-03-27 11:31:03 PM
I could be a "hateful liberal" and point out that this guy's head looks like a canned ham that has been left to bake in the sun, but I will take the higher road and just say his blog sucks balls.
 
2012-03-28 12:50:15 AM
The only thing missing from this tripe is admitting that when they say Liberal, we all know it is a Conservative.

It's like a homeless man sitting on the street in front of liquor store,
and some jerk comes out after making a purchase, picks up a brick, tosses it through the window of the store,
and blames it on the homeless man when the police show.

Yeah, that is your Liberal.
 
2012-03-28 12:50:38 AM
Cythraul: FTA: "1) Most liberals are hateful people."

Aaaand, I stopped reading.


he said the truth would be uncomfortable.

/ he lost me at 4. only the closed mindedest people could believe that.
 
2012-03-28 01:01:11 AM
ChaoticLimbs: I agree with him that we Liberals are less moral people.

Personally, I think ethics are more important than morals. Morals systems are based on simple rules. Ethics are based on an entire way of thinking about the world. In an ethical system, you don't have to forbid theft if you already believe that humans have the right to maintain their own possessions, and you don't have to forbid murder if you believe in the importance of individual human beings and how precious and special they are as sentient beings.

Here's an example: A highly MORAL person I work with was aghast that I would bring back my receipt because a store forgot to charge me for an item worth about 20 dollars. I argued that if I want to own the item, I have to pay for it. If they overcharged me, I would certainly go back to remedy it, so since they undercharged me, I must treat the situation with the same care. He argued that it wasn't theft because they allowed me to leave with the item and they didn't KNOW they hadn't charged me. Well, I know, and that's enough. He thinks I'm crazy. I think that if I want to demand respect for my ownership of things, I must first consistently apply that respect towards others. I find it inconsistent to add to the theft and dishonesty of the world when it benefits me, and then bemoan the exact same problem when I am the victim of it.




Well sure... but, iokiyar.
 
2012-03-28 01:11:45 AM
there really isn't anything a conservative could say about me that would effectively insult my political leanings.

you should really focus on cleaning up the filthy sty you call a home, before you criticize the dust in my house.
 
2012-03-28 01:24:15 AM
SOMEONE GIVE THAT MAN A /BOLD TAG
 
2012-03-28 01:25:08 AM
technicolor-misfit: Yeah, which is exactly why trolling never ever works... When people post obviously stupid shiat no one ever responds at all. It's incontrovertible human nature.

The irony in this is staggering.
 
2012-03-28 01:30:57 AM
5 stereotypes against so-called liberals?
 
2012-03-28 01:33:22 AM
wedding vegetables: there really isn't anything a conservative could say about me that would effectively insult my political leanings.

you should really focus on cleaning up the filthy sty you call a home, before you criticize the dust in my house.


Wasn't there some guy who said that, some radical hippie/socialist back in the day, about taking care of the beam in your own eye before worrying about the speck in someone else's?
 
2012-03-28 01:41:37 AM
Mrs.Sharpier: [i96.photobucket.com image 480x360]


got a lil something on your shirt there.


he's even fatter than me. damn!
 
2012-03-28 03:55:22 AM
Vodka Zombie: Mrs.Sharpier: His facebook photos (new window)

Looks like he uh ... errrr... Likes to have his picture taken with hot chicks

Indeed...


That is a mini-Bachmann.

WTF ...crreeeeepy
 
2012-03-28 05:14:06 AM
Lando Lincoln: Four ACTUAL uncomfortable truths about liberals (which may not be exclusive to liberals):

1) We're a bunch of apathetic lazy farks that don't get off of our asses and protest things the way they should be protested in the numbers that should be protesting.

2) We have a really hard time focusing on just one issue. Every time we do get riled up about something, the discussion always fragments into a million little side issues and then the media portrays us as a bunch of stupid asses that doesn't know what the fark we're talking about. The media isn't looking for truth - they're looking for the freakshow. And there's always some freaks in the bunch willing to give them what they're looking for.

3) We've let the conservatives railroad the definition of "liberal" for far too long. There's a lot of Americans out there that are liberal leaning but they don't identify as "liberal" because they don't want to be identified as what conservatives have painted the word "liberal" as.

4) When we do manage to get actual liberal politicians to run for office, we don't rally around them / donate to them nearly as much as we should. We could learn a lot from the Teabaggers on this one. Imagine what our country would be like if we went out and pushed a bunch of true hard-core liberals into office like the Teabaggers did in 2010.


You need to get focused. You can start by changing the name of the Democratic Party to match what you're actually doing this election year.

I'd recommend something like:

'The People's Socialist Racialist Democratic Party'

This captures the key elements of the Democratic platform championed by Nancy Pelosi:

1. Inject race into every issue, and make political capital out of any incident in the media that can be tied to race, however remotely.

2. Nationalize everything through monetary dependencies, or any other means possible.

3. Present incorrect information about incime, taxation, the economic health of Europe, the sustainability of debt - whatever it takes to favor adoption of the socialist ideal.

4. Leave the word 'Democrat' in there for historical reasons. After all, whats good enough for North Korea should be good enough for you.
 
2012-03-28 05:32:50 AM
technicolor-misfit: Here's an example: A highly MORAL person I work with was aghast that I would bring back my receipt because a store forgot to charge me for an item worth about 20 dollars. I argued that if I want to own the item, I have to pay for it. If they overcharged me, I would certainly go back to remedy it, so since they undercharged me, I must treat the situation with the same care. He argued that it wasn't theft because they allowed me to leave with the item and they didn't KNOW they hadn't charged me. Well, I know, and that's enough. He thinks I'm crazy. I think that if I want to demand respect for my ownership of things, I must first consistently apply that respect towards others. I find it inconsistent to add to the theft and dishonesty of the world when it benefits me, and then bemoan the exact same problem when I am the victim of it.

The problem with lib ethics is they never see the whole picture. Lib "tecnicolour" here has commendably paid 20 dollars when he maybe could have gootn away with not paying. But he believes in Obamacare, which plans to steal hundreds or thousands of dollars from every American every single day.
 
2012-03-28 07:52:55 AM
Animatronik: I'd recommend something like:

'The People's Socialist Racialist Democratic Party'

This captures the key elements of the Democratic platform championed by Nancy Pelosi:

1. Inject race into every issue, and make political capital out of any incident in the media that can be tied to race, however remotely.

2. Nationalize everything through monetary dependencies, or any other means possible.

3. Present incorrect information about incime, taxation, the economic health of Europe, the sustainability of debt - whatever it takes to favor adoption of the socialist ideal.

4. Leave the word 'Democrat' in there for historical reasons. After all, whats good enough for North Korea should be good enough for you.


Where do you people get this shiat?
 
2012-03-28 08:27:20 AM
Halli: Where do you people get this shiat?

Where does anybody get shiat? They're pulling it from the same place.
 
2012-03-28 09:57:24 AM
Animatronik: This captures the key elements of the Democratic platform championed by Nancy Pelosi:

Just shut the fark up, you moron. Go worry about fixing your own severely broken party before you worry about mine.
 
2012-03-28 12:11:43 PM
badaboom: Ablejack: Single most Uncomfortable truth about Liberals for this blogger:
There are more of them than conservatives.

Not even close.
Link (new window)


Hey now, these statements are not meant to be factual. They are "uncomfortable truths". Just like the 'uncomfortable truths" listed in the article- total hogwash stuff that conservatives tremble over because of their panicky ways.
 
2012-03-28 12:16:28 PM
soy_bomb: Its actually very sad, it continues a long history of Democratic violence against African-Americans that finds its roots in the founding of the Klu Klux Klan

And here, I thought you were a boring idiot all these months. Now I see you're just boring. And faking it.

Into the box with you.
 
2012-03-28 12:26:21 PM
badaboom: You can point out his hypocrisy without reducing yourself or the argument.

Seems to me that that's exactly what he did.

badaboom: You can call the opinion stupid.

OK! You just voiced a stupid opinion. But then again, that's the sort of thing that stupid people do.
 
2012-03-28 12:43:36 PM
THE GREAT NAME: With such ideas as communism, socialism and climate-change theory,

Well, there's a convincing commonality.

I admit to losing, because I looked at your profile, but mostly to see when you registered. I have to give you props for being patient enough to wait almost six months before launching into Total Retard mode, but now that you've revealed what we can expect from this handle....

Into the box with you.
 
2012-03-28 02:25:25 PM
James F. Campbell: technicolor-misfit: Yeah, which is exactly why trolling never ever works... When people post obviously stupid shiat no one ever responds at all. It's incontrovertible human nature.

The irony in this is staggering.



I disagree. It's not ironic at all. It's evidence of my point. My post is its own proof.
 
2012-03-28 06:20:29 PM
We need a Derp button to go with the other two.
 
2012-03-28 09:36:10 PM
1) The writer projects.
2) Projection.
3) Surprise! The writer projects.
4) The Writer Projects 2: Projection Bugaloo
5) Wait for iiiiiiit...

...the writer projects.

I'm not even saying that conservatives or most people at TownHall are projecting, but the writer is. So very very much. His bioluminescence should be studied in a lab to bring down the energy requirements of modern projectors.
 
2012-03-29 12:02:36 AM
Deucednuisance: THE GREAT NAME: With such ideas as communism, socialism and climate-change theory,

Well, there's a convincing commonality.

I admit to losing, because I looked at your profile, but mostly to see when you registered. I have to give you props for being patient enough to wait almost six months before launching into Total Retard mode, but now that you've revealed what we can expect from this handle....

Into the box with you.



I am ashamed I missed this comment earlier. Yet another person to join Bevets in my Hall of Dishonor.
 
2012-03-29 07:57:53 PM
whidbey: Actually, I see two truths here:

1. Townhall is a bunch of right-wing whargarbl
2. There are 523 comments here

I'm guessing (correctly) that none of the supposed 5 items are worth my time, or frankly, any of yours.


It's probably worth our time more than the colossal number of white supremacists who have shown up in the Trayvon Martin threads. Seriously. Fark's threads on the shooting are only marginally distinguishable from 4chan's.
 
2012-03-29 11:24:32 PM
Skeptos: I know it's hard to imagine, but once upon a time, there were genuine conservative intellectuals. People like William F. Buckley, Russell Kirk, Irving Kristol, James Burnham, and Milton Friedman. You might disagree with their analyses and conclusions, but you wouldn't read something by them and wonder if they might be psychotic or mildly retarded.

This.
 
Displayed 582 of 582 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report