If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The comics page)   What's Doonsbury got to say about Total Fark?   (images.ucomics.com) divider line 103
    More: Amusing  
•       •       •

30671 clicks; posted to Main » on 27 Oct 2003 at 8:57 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



103 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2003-10-27 08:22:38 PM
Doonsbury = teh 5ux0rZ!!!!!11!
 
2003-10-27 08:59:19 PM
har har har
 
2003-10-27 08:59:45 PM
pffffffffffftt!
 
2003-10-27 08:59:59 PM
he's prolly just fapping to pr0n.
 
2003-10-27 09:00:44 PM
Huh?
 
2003-10-27 09:01:03 PM
Nice TF ad slip in...

I've made a few efforts over the years to get into doonesbury, but some far out political tangent ensues, and I don't wanna pay attention to that kind of stuff, especially on the funnies page.
 
2003-10-27 09:01:09 PM
I read it this morning and I didn't get it.

Now I can feel content and "in on things" that I, too, am a total farker. Just like the CIA dude in Doonsbury.

Thanks, Gary!
 
2003-10-27 09:01:10 PM
Doonsbury = teh 5ux0rZ!!!!!11!

LOL it funney cause it's true!!1
 
2003-10-27 09:02:26 PM
evilwinofjoat

You got a team of monkeys workin' on that theory?
 
2003-10-27 09:02:28 PM
hey... I saw the creator of Doons on Screen Savers over the weekend.... he's a big time Tech TV fan... even has referenced them a few times.
 
2003-10-27 09:03:27 PM
Doonesbury is rarely funny. This is at least original, though lame.

Long live Berkeley Breathed! Long live Aaron McGruder!
 
2003-10-27 09:10:04 PM
"What do Farkers have to say about misleading thread titles?"

lynch the mod that passed it through ?

hehehe....

 
2003-10-27 09:10:50 PM
Here comes the comics.
 
2003-10-27 09:11:00 PM
Wow. I need time to formulate a response to this. Hrm...

Oh hell with it, Footday Night Monball is on

WTF?
 
2003-10-27 09:11:06 PM
how unfunny


flips to obits
 
2003-10-27 09:11:32 PM
ohhhhhhhh i get it it..It's membership to porn and not Total Fark...The old switcheroo there...Not funny
 
2003-10-27 09:12:24 PM
I thought it was talking about a pr0n site and not TotalFark when I read it this morning...

-/am I the only one?
 
2003-10-27 09:13:52 PM
doonesbury is great - i've been following the strip for years. that one would have been funnier though, if one of the guy's hands had been...um...under the table. ah well.
 
Mog
2003-10-27 09:15:04 PM
Someone let me know when Calvin and Hobbes comes back (if ever).
 
2003-10-27 09:15:17 PM
Worst. Plug. Ever.
 
2003-10-27 09:16:37 PM
thegrue where are the comics? p.s. zork sucked.
 
2003-10-27 09:18:59 PM
Why do I get the feeling the poster of above headline is insecure.
 
2003-10-27 09:25:37 PM
What's Doonsbury got to say about Total Fark?
I don't know.

*clicks link*

I still don't know.

But, uh, buy TotalFark just because.
 
2003-10-27 09:26:31 PM
Porn site, not fark. Even with the prompting I'm having trouble making the connection to fark. It must be the tie on the door comment that's throwing me.

And, Doonsbury has Uncle Duke, which makes Doonsbury > other comics.
 
2003-10-27 09:26:44 PM
Doonsbury sucks. The author is as hypocritical as Ann Coulter
 
2003-10-27 09:27:24 PM
No its pr0n. But maybe someone will think that paying for Drew Curtis' TotalFark by Drew Curtis will make them more politically and socially aware.
 
2003-10-27 09:32:37 PM
Ah yes.

Calvin & Hobbes.

Bloom County....

Far Side........

Why do all the great ones go away.....?

(sniffle)...

Here comes the melancholy.
 
2003-10-27 09:34:53 PM
Saw it this morning. I assumed he was looking at porn, too.
 
2003-10-27 09:35:33 PM
Okay. Whatever.
 
2003-10-27 09:35:38 PM
Obviously absolutely nothing. Bleh.
 
2003-10-27 09:37:23 PM
Doonsbury has been suckin for years.Don't know anyone who reads it. :(
 
2003-10-27 09:41:52 PM
I wouldn't be surprised, a WHOLE lot of morning DJ's troll Fark; I've noticed that a lot of late night show writers seem to do the same. Therefore, the next logical step up the humorists rung would have to be comic strip/book writers.
 
2003-10-27 09:43:16 PM
Associating Poonsbury with Total Fark is not a favorable advertising technique, just FYI.
 
2003-10-27 09:43:39 PM
I dont get it
 
2003-10-27 09:44:10 PM
The Seattle Times started running The Far Side again starting today. And the new Breathed strips are starting in a week or two. It's almost like the late 80s all over again.

By the way, not a huge fan of the Boondocks. I like the guy for being different, but when he's not preaching to the converted, he's beating a dead horse. Actually, when he's preaching to the converted (and face it, how many conservatives read his strip) he's still beating that horse.
 
2003-10-27 09:51:53 PM
Folderol They get so rich and successful that they get tired of writing and drawing 6 cartoons a week. It's really a shame.
 
Tor
2003-10-27 09:52:27 PM
Don't like Doonesbury. He seems to think that because I'm republican I'm fat, rich, and always wrong.
Probably the best moment was when he criticized GWBush for using nicknames, when his little drawings are the sam godamn thing.
 
2003-10-27 09:58:44 PM
Anyone care to comment on how a "Who cares?" comment gets banned?
 
2003-10-27 09:59:29 PM
I can't wait to see the Family Circus plug membership only bewbs on Fark. Little Billy always cracks me up with his zany, obtuse and offbeat humor.

Seriously, what morons thought of the idea of periodical comics that have nothing to do with ideology, and that such recycled crap would be amusing to anything but the minds of small children.
 
2003-10-27 10:01:15 PM
ahh, remember when Doonsbury was funny? me neither.
 
2003-10-27 10:03:50 PM
tor: he criticized GWBush for using nicknames, when his little drawings are the sam godamn thing

his ''little drawings'' are named ''sam''?
 
2003-10-27 10:04:15 PM
First, it's "Doonesbury". Second, if you don't find it funny, maybe you ought to go read your Mallard Filmore or Nancy strips that make you guffaw so hard.
 
2003-10-27 10:05:16 PM
Screw Aaron Macgruder. What's with the guy with the ridiculously huge hair? It's just a couple black kids biatching about nothing. Maybe if you know the stories behind Doonesbury, how long he has been doing the strip, etc. then you would understand that Trudeau's work is satiring the government system perfectly.
 
2003-10-27 10:06:53 PM
Silent "e" strikes again!

Who can turn a cap into a cape?
Who can change a tap into a tape?
But my friend Sam stays just the same.

It's not too hard to see, it's silent "e".
 
2003-10-27 10:09:53 PM
What's fascinating about that link is that it allows you to look at -all- the syndicated comics without having to go through the main ucomics page.

If there -are- any doonesbury fans, you can also look all the comics back to the 1970s.

http://images.ucomics.com/comics/db/
 
2003-10-27 10:16:58 PM
that's a stretch
 
Tor
2003-10-27 10:21:01 PM
"" his 'little drawings' are named 'sam'? ""

Dur? Oh, I missed the e. Well, shiat, what do you excpect from a Republica?
 
2003-10-27 10:22:16 PM
Doonesbury. Meh. I enjoy 9 Chickweed Lane myself.
 
2003-10-27 10:36:43 PM
I can't wait to see the Family Circus plug membership only bewbs on Fark. Little Billy always cracks me up with his zany, obtuse and offbeat humor.

"Who's signed up for total fark?"
"Not Me."
 
2003-10-27 10:39:23 PM
What's fascinating about that link is that it allows you to look at -all- the syndicated comics without having to go through the main ucomics page.

If there -are- any doonesbury fans, you can also look all the comics back to the 1970s.

http://images.ucomics.com/comics/db/


Oh, THANKS, Shotgun. Now I won't get any work done for about a month!
 
Displayed 50 of 103 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report