Eimers says Limbaugh made "morally wrong statements," but criticized a number of "dangerous, radical organizations" for seizing upon those statements and to attack free speech.

He was wrong, but it made the liberals mad, so I'll back it 100%.

This is exactly the kind of backwards stupidity I expect from Lenoir City.

Man... These Conservative dinks really have no idea what free speech is all about, do they?

Why would you buy national ad time for a local business or is he just buying local ad time on the station that happens to play Limbaugh?

Vodka Zombie: Man... These Conservative dinks really have no idea what free speech is all about, do they?

That means freedom from consequences, right? I can say whatever I want and no reprecussions?

GAT_00: Eimers says Limbaugh made "morally wrong statements," but criticized a number of "dangerous, radical organizations" for seizing upon those statements and to attack free speech.

He was wrong, but it made the liberals mad, so I'll back it 100%.

This is exactly the kind of backwards stupidity I expect from Lenoir City.

Make a liberal angry, vote for Newt call a random woman a slut for using hormonal therapy to prevent ovarian cysts.

/Suck down another insurance-paid Viagra, you impotent Republican shiatstains

impaler: I want to buy ad space on his program airing Fluke's actual speech, interleaved with Limbaugh calling her a slut.

Perhaps we should start a collection for this. It would be interesting if, after throwing out accusations of censorship, if they refused to run the ad...

Did anyone else read that as "Widow Cleaning Service"?

I wonder what Elmer's female relations (assuming he has them) think of his choice and "reasoning".

FTFA: "They are harassing advertisers with questionably legal secondary boycotts and threats," he says. "We support free speech... For those who will choose to use this ad as an excuse to attack our constiutional right to free speech, I have one thing to say: We will not be intimidated. Bring it on."

So spouting off is considered free speech, but boycotting a company for advertising with the person spouting off is totally not cool?

RandomExcess: Did anyone else read that as "Widow Cleaning Service"?

No. You are a broken and demented individual.

Be vewy, vewy quiet I'm hunting wacist customers!

Wrong Elmer?

The paste guy or just an eater of same?

What the window cleaner didn't see?

/Meh, got nothing.

I have the perfect advertiser (new window) for Rush. Maybe, he'll even stuff and mount what's left of Blimbaugh's career.

Lou Brown: FTFA: "They are harassing advertisers with questionably legal secondary boycotts and threats," he says. "We support free speech... For those who will choose to use this ad as an excuse to attack our constiutional right to free speech, I have one thing to say: We will not be intimidated. Bring it on."

So spouting off is considered free speech, but boycotting a company for advertising with the person spouting off is totally not cool?

Well, it is "questionably legal".

More_Like_A_Stain: Lou Brown: FTFA: "They are harassing advertisers with questionably legal secondary boycotts and threats," he says. "We support free speech... For those who will choose to use this ad as an excuse to attack our constiutional right to free speech, I have one thing to say: We will not be intimidated. Bring it on."

So spouting off is considered free speech, but boycotting a company for advertising with the person spouting off is totally not cool?

Well, it is "questionably legal".

What kind of boycott is questionably legal?

More_Like_A_Stain: Well, it is "questionably legal".

I suppose that's like "mostly pregnant"

Headso: Why would you buy national ad time for a local business or is he just buying local ad time on the station that happens to play Limbaugh?

I don't actually think it was a national ad buy. Local time on the Rush show must be only a few hundred bucks an ad or less right now.

bmongar: More_Like_A_Stain: Lou Brown: FTFA: "They are harassing advertisers with questionably legal secondary boycotts and threats," he says. "We support free speech... For those who will choose to use this ad as an excuse to attack our constiutional right to free speech, I have one thing to say: We will not be intimidated. Bring it on."

So spouting off is considered free speech, but boycotting a company for advertising with the person spouting off is totally not cool?

Well, it is "questionably legal".

What kind of boycott is questionably legal?

The kind that violates Rushs' Constitutional right to all of that sweet advertiser money.


/A sarcasm tag, a sarcasm tag. My kingdom for a sarcasm tag

Because People in power are Stupid: Growing up it all seems so one-sided
Opinions all provided
The future pre-decided
Detached and subdivided
In the mass production zone
Nowhere is the dreamer or the misfit so alone

Deceptively progressive words coming from a shiatstain Objectivist.

Geotpf: Local time on the Rush show must be only a few hundred bucks an ad or less right now.

the fark politics tab should pick a market and buy some ads, I'd actually throw in five bucks for that..

Diogenes: More_Like_A_Stain: Lou Brown: FTFA: "They are harassing advertisers with questionably legal secondary boycotts and threats," he says. "We support free speech... For those who will choose to use this ad as an excuse to attack our constiutional right to free speech, I have one thing to say: We will not be intimidated. Bring it on."

So spouting off is considered free speech, but boycotting a company for advertising with the person spouting off is totally not cool?

Well, it is "questionably legal".

We're legally required to buy goods and services from Rush's advertisers?

Of course, anything less is violating his right to free speech.

FTFA: "Eimer said his add (sic) already got him one new customer (LOLOL)"

/was it Rush's advertisement, or his attention deficit disorder?
//like gamblers, he reported his gain. Will he report on customers he loses?

jake_lex: aearra: I wonder what Elmer's female relations (assuming he has them) think of his choice and "reasoning".

If any of Elmer's female relations give him any lip about this, he'll give them a black eye to teach them that they should shut up and get him a sammich.

I mean, if it's fine for Rush to attack a private citizen as a "slut" for her political beliefs, I can conclude that ol' Elmer is a wife-beater for his, right?

No need to descend to anyone else's level. Though I admit, it's very, very tempting.

/cue the old Looney Tunes boxing referee gag - "You shold never do *this* (WHACK!) or *this* (WHAM!) and under no circumstances should you do *this*! (BUH-BAM!)"...

Lol, who is next? Who will choose to ally themselves with this spawn of evil?


I am looking at you, Spatula City!


/10th one is a penny, I've heard.

Kevin72: FTFA: "Eimer said his add (sic) already got him one new customer (LOLOL)"

/was it Rush's advertisement, or his attention deficit disorder?
//like gamblers, he reported his gain. Will he report on customers he loses?

The ad was so effective that he got that new customer before it even aired. Word got out that he had recorded it, and the buzz just grew from there.

Headso: the fark politics tab should pick a market and buy some ads, I'd actually throw in five bucks for that..

The best approach would be for it to be total WTF, make no sense whatsoever, and not actually promote or sell anything.

Lou Brown: More_Like_A_Stain: Well, it is "questionably legal".

I suppose that's like "mostly pregnant"

I read that as "More like a Stalin".

GAT_00: Eimers says Limbaugh made "morally wrong statements," but criticized a number of "dangerous, radical organizations" for seizing upon those statements and to attack free speech.

He was wrong, but it made the liberals mad, so I'll back it 100%.

This is exactly the kind of backwards stupidity I expect from Lenoir City people who listen to Rush Lumbaugh.

Headso: Geotpf: Local time on the Rush show must be only a few hundred bucks an ad or less right now.

the fark politics tab should pick a market and buy some ads, I'd actually throw in five bucks for that..

I'd rather throw 5 bucks into a "Sandra Fluke Sues the Shiat out of a Fat Tub of Goo" fund but your idea is lulzy too.

Goodbye, Elmer. Hello, dirty windows.

Bacontastesgood: Headso: the fark politics tab should pick a market and buy some ads, I'd actually throw in five bucks for that..

The best approach would be for it to be total WTF, make no sense whatsoever, and not actually promote or sell anything.

"We've got UFIA's!, We've got BSABSVR's!, we're traveling!, marine core members half price!, we've got internet dentistry books on tape! call now!" and then never give a number....

whatsupchuck: Goodbye, Elmer. Hello, dirty windows.

Looks like the ads are working: FTFA "I've alread made back the money I paid, so I'm pumped"

Look at him he's studying the green his grip is perfect be the ball THAT's MY BOY IT's IN THE HOLE, YEAH! That good daddy? Great, we gotta get you a set of clubs! But he's only 3.... He's almost 4. Odds of your kid becoming a professional golfer? 1 in 141245. Odds of your kid having autism? One in 152.

WHAT LIMBAUGH ADS MIGHT SOUND LIKE HOUR AFTER HOUR

What this means is that if even Elmer can afford to buy an ad, this means that Rushbo's revenue is certainly taking a deep cut. He'll have to get by on only TWO fistfuls of Oxycontin per show instead of five, and have to cut back to only three Dominican girlyboys per week.

Hate radio. Small timers talking to small timers with a few half dead rednecks listening.

And if Elmer's sales start to fall, will he just blame the liberal media?

Bacontastesgood: Headso: the fark politics tab should pick a market and buy some ads, I'd actually throw in five bucks for that..

The best approach would be for it to be total WTF, make no sense whatsoever, and not actually promote or sell anything.

Innovation. Determination. The American Spirit.

Globocon Incorporated