CO2 drank the last beer!

Torqueknot: Coloration equals causation now?

fark! Now I got to stop dating fat chicks.


'cus it means I'm fat?

Just fat black chicks...

Dr. Mojo PhD:

GeneralJim: Yeah, because we all know how reliable diagnosing someone you have never met from text messages on Fark is.

Why don't you ask a professional about making such claims of mental illness in others?

Claims such as this?

GeneralJim: The reason I can tell? There are common cognitive disorders. Your brains all malfunction in the same way. That is rather amazingly unlikely.

Considering your impediment, this is actually a rather fair question. No, NOT like that. I'm not going to go back and find what failure-to-understand I was discussing in your quote mine here, but let's use the one you're doing HERE.

No doubt you can't see it -- that's part of the problem. So, let's make an analogy that involves ME screwing something up, as that probably won't enrage you as badly.

Okay, let's say I consistently call Obama's wife "Lady Bird." When confronted, I defend it, and say that IS her name. Now, right after I post, a farker with the name "Mojo is a poopy-head" shows up and says what a WONDERFUL post Jim just wrote. "He" then goes on to talk about Obama and his controlling wife, "Lady Bird." You ask about that, and "he" says "Yeah, what about her?" At that point, you would be sure that "he" was an alt of mine. And, assuming I or "he" weren't lying to you, if I and he both thought Obama's wife was Lady Bird, then that is a cognitive problem, easily observable.

"You're psychotic and blah de blah, woof woof." is a totally different thing. You consistently mix these up. So do Envoy and Monkey Boy. I'd tell you to go back and check the brain fart to which I was referring, but, ironically, you're the LAST person who would see the error. It's kind of funny, in a way.

So, add this to the list of things to discuss with the mental health professional when you see him or her. And, take along copies of YOUR posts, and my posts pointing out the problems.


Oh, yeah, and don't forget to tell him how you "all" took pictures of your license plates to "prove" where you were, and that you weren't alts.

untaken_name:

GeneralJim: and then I look at my check account on line.... DAMMIT! Not a freaking penny.

You sound poor. Most people have at least a penny in their checking account.

Not a freaking penny of that sweet, sweet, oil company money.

/ It's called "context."

Dr. Mojo PhD:

I predict his behaviour will engage in avoidance and deflection. He does exactly that, failing to even once address his treatment of Damnhippyfreak vis-a-vis his statement that he will treat politely those who treat him politely (you will notice he removes any mention of Dhf and his original statement from the reply), instead rambling about "mind reading", which has nothing to do with the main argument of my post

Hippy calls me dishonest in practically every post he makes. Do you think adding the " ;) " at the end makes it polite?

Dr. Mojo PhD:

GeneralJim: So, wherever you are, you found what appears to be an Ontario Plate. Congratulations. Naturally, those are found ONLY in Ontario. And, of course, there's no way that someone else could take a photo in the world and get it to you within an hour or two. Mail delivery takes weeks, right? This is really funny in a guilty pleasure sort of way.

It is, admittedly, a little fascinating watching a tiny example of Freudian defence mechanisms run amok. Projection and denial, projection and denial, repeated ad nauseam. It's like watching a lab rat run a maze in its hypnotic display of animal behaviour. You know what the rat's going to do, but you watch it anyway, fascinated by the wonderful order underlying the world. Even Jim's insanity, for all the chaos it likely causes in everything his carcinogenic personality injects itself into, has an order to it, a method to the madness, if you will. In this case, it's the self-preservation attempts of a mind that has no underlying belief in its own capacity or position in the world desperately and constantly attempting to reassure itself it does.

Blah, blah, woof, woof. I was pointing out the ways that such BS COULD be faked. That's that SAME ERROR. I did not say that was what you did, but several people COULD take photos for you.

What I CAN tell you, however, is that Loki's Dong, or whatever, chimed in, although I was not discussing him as one of your alts, and sent a picture. (The middle one, above) But, the other two, you and envoy, who I DID accuse of being co-alts, or however that is phrased, appear to be taken with the same camera. Wow, from England to Canada in a couple of minutes. Most impressive. That's an interesting tidbit, isn't it? Now, yeah, I suppose you COULD have the same camera phone, but it's a way interesting coincidence, isn't it?

So, I guess we can add "Metadata" to the list of things that don't show up on your RADAR.

Dr. Mojo PhD:

Well, nothing in there for it being the only way, except for the part where you explicitly said it was the only way,

There's that characteristic cognitive failure again. NO, I DID NOT SAY THAT. It is the only way we, TODAY, have been able to create an image made by carbonizing only the outside of linen fibers.

But, do you have another way? And, if so, did they know about it in medieval times?

/ Come on, once more around the axle!

GeneralJim: Hippy calls me dishonest in practically every post he makes. Do you think adding the " ;) " at the end makes it polite?

That's because in Hippydippyderper's world, to be called DISINGENUOUS is a primal ultimate insult when factual science fails to support his sociopathological happy dance. He falls upon his ad hom sword and uses genteel faux-zen-like imitations of the thirtysomething Miles Drentel character as an ultimate defense mechanism.
Which is why the Hippydippyderper is on my ignore list, happily.

Running around an internet forum calling people with whom you disagree dishonest is like shouting at clouds for floating in the sky. But I guess everyone needs a hobby to make them feel relevant.

GeneralJim: Oh, yeah, and don't forget to tell him how you "all" took pictures of your license plates to "prove" where you were, and that you weren't alts.

Yes, in different hand writing, no less, with different weathering on the vehicles -- eg; the Ontario one shows signs of salt corrosion from a Canadian winter. Clearly, this is not proof that at least three of the people you accused of being alts are separate people at separate locations.

No, instead, the only logical conclusion is one of the following two scenarios:

1. A person with three different hand writing styles has access to vehicles from across the North American continent as well as a vehicle illegally plated for the United Kingdom in North America.

2. We have a cadre of volunteers that, although willing to personally engage in persecuting a random member of an internet message board, will not each assume the role of a character, instead allowing a single member to post as multiple different people, all without ever slipping up in dialect, grammar, or syntax, even though these same multiple people could just post as our characters.

What did you call this stroke of deductive genius?

GeneralJim: Occam's razor suggests...

Ah yes. Occam's razor. Occam's razor suggests that if you aren't friends with 10 out of the nearly 7 billion people that inhabit this planet, those ten people are really one person conspiring against you. Or ten people conspiring against you, but only one of them waging a personal war with you on Fark, the other nine hiding out at various geographic locations to personally make you appear insane, waiting on stand-by for years to build up to what only appears to be (but really isn't) your meltdown.

I don't think William of Ockham intended for you to seize the razor and slash his throat with it.

GeneralJim: Hippy calls me dishonest in practically every post he makes. Do you think adding the " ;) " at the end makes it polite?

Do you think a person cannot say something is dishonest without being polite, or still engaging you as a human being, and giving you a rational level of discourse?

When accused of possessing a personality disorder whose main feature is a thin-skinned nature whose response to criticism is disproportionate anger, do not go out of your way to prove the point. My own wife calls me worse things than "dishonest" when she's mad at me, and yet we still love each other. Funny, that, dealing with criticism in a rational, mature way rather than engaging in a childish response.

It seems you want to say whatever you want to say and be shielded from any and all criticism for it. If you're criticized with something as simple as a statement that people believe you're either dishonest or not doing due diligence on your "scientific" work, this is some grand personal insult that makes another human being the most "UGLY-spirited" of the bunch. What childish twaddle.

ryarger:

Look at this, an entire thread devoted to His Greenness!

Wow, I know. If I WERE an attention whore, this thread would be my pr0n.

And the Urantia Book... Wow, I had missed that development.

Hey, does the Urantia Book talk about taking giant steaming dumps on the memory of dead Iranians? Anything about gleefully disgracing the sacrifices made by student protestors?

For anyone not up to speed, ask GJ pretty please for the REAL reason for the green text.

Just have a vomit pail nearby for when you realize that he is *proud* of urinating on the memory of those who died for freedom.

Erm, can someone translate this out of wharrgarbl and into English? I just had the intro course required to post on Fark... This is freaking wharrgarbl LITERATURE.

common sense is an oxymoron:

Truly one of a kind.

Yep, just like everyone else.

Gleeman:

Dear author of this 'research':
[images.icanhascheezburger.com image 500x307]


/I can hear the climatologists saying "YOU'RE NOT HELPING!"

Oh, are we still allowed to talk about TFA?

Yeah, that is one of the dumber things I've ever read -- and I read Fark threads...

common sense is an oxymoron:

This mind-reading thing is sort of an obsession with you, isn't it?

Um, no. Don't pretend you can read my mind, and I'll probably never mention it.

GeneralJim: But, the other two, you and envoy, who I DID accuse of being co-alts, or however that is phrased, appear to be taken with the same camera. Wow, from England to Canada in a couple of minutes. Most impressive. That's an interesting tidbit, isn't it?

It would help if it were true. You have some evidence to support this assertion?

GeneralJim: Now, yeah, I suppose you COULD have the same camera phone, but it's a way interesting coincidence, isn't it?

I didn't take it with a camera phone. I took it with a snapshot digital camera. I said this in the other thread. For somebody that reads metadata as well as you, it's surprising that for somebody who can magically divine the type of camera it was taken on, you can't tell a phone from a point-and-shoot digital.

GeneralJim: There's that characteristic cognitive failure again. NO, I DID NOT SAY THAT. It is the only way we, TODAY, have been able to create an image made by carbonizing only the outside of linen fibers.

That is, again, not what you said. Do you think cropping out the quote will stop me from requoting it?

GeneralJim: So, to believe the Shroud to be a medieval fake, one has to believe that the hoaxers generated a 3-D image that was beyond the technology of the 1960s, made it photo-negative, and then burned it onto the linen with UV or X-Ray lasers.

Let's parse this a little, removing the extraneous bits:

GeneralJim: So, to believe the Shroud to be a medieval fake, one has to believe that the hoaxers ... burned it onto the linen with UV or X-Ray lasers.

If it's not the only way, Jim, why does one have to believe that? If you aren't saying it's the only way, why are you then presenting the only possibly conclusion that it is a medieval forgery as one involving lasers?

It's because you said something stupid and your deranged defence mechanisms kicked in again!

Mad Tea Party:

The Shroud of Turin wharrgarbl is a refreshing change from the usual climate change wharrgarbl.

Nothing like the smell of freshly changed wharrgarbl in the morning.

Gunther:

You think murdering us would "balance the scales" for us arguing with you on Fark. All this time, I thought you just had a couple of nutty beliefs, but no: you are genuinely not sane.

Well, mostly. If I were the nit-picky type, I'd have to urinate on your corpses afterward, but what's a quart or two of urine between Fark buddies?

Wow, I had never run across this character before...

I've been playing too much Fallout New Vegas apparently, by the time I got to the end of the thread I was hearing all the green text read in the voice of No-Bark Noonan.

"It's ghouls, I tell ya. Religious ghouls in rockets looking for a land to call their own. Don't you laugh at me! I know a spell that will make you show your true form; cave rat taught it to me."

What the heavenly fark does the Urantia Book have to do with anything, anywhere?
Ditto the shroud of Turin. Also. And.

GeneralJim: Gunther: You think murdering us would "balance the scales" for us arguing with you on Fark. All this time, I thought you just had a couple of nutty beliefs, but no: you are genuinely not sane.

Well, mostly. If I were the nit-picky type, I'd have to urinate on your corpses afterward, but what's a quart or two of urine between Fark buddies?

YOU DISAGREED WITH ME ABOUT AGW! IF WE EVER MET FACE-TO-FACE I COULD GUT YOU AND URINATE ON YOUR CORPSES AFTERWARDS TO MAKE IT FAIR, AND HOW DARE YOU CALL ME INSANE?

Just more normal people thoughts for a normal kind of guy.

Dr. Mojo PhD: What childish twaddle.

Looks like Jon Snow and Hippydippyderper have a sock puppet!

I just scanned all this and it seems there are Shrouds of CO2 or something being discussed (actually the green font can help someone trying to follow the banter, which isn't me).

Just thought I'd mention -back to the original article- that there is such a simple cure for the human contribution to global warming not mentioned at all, and so obvious it's a mystery why the article failed to recommend it: FEWER HUMANS!!!! Yes, the CO2 increased as their numbers increased!!!

Dr. Mojo PhD: YOU DISAGREED WITH ME ABOUT AGW! IF WE EVER MET FACE-TO-FACE I COULD GUT YOU AND URINATE ON YOUR CORPSES AFTERWARDS TO MAKE IT FAIR, AND HOW DARE YOU CALL ME INSANE?

Or he could just hit you from half a mile out with a Barrett and let it go at that.
Right?

Let the eliminationist rhetoric flow through you, Luke. Feel its power!

Gunther:

GeneralJim: That's NOT a desire I'm expressing, it's just what it would take to balance the scales.

Wow; you really are crazy, aren't you?

You think murdering us would "balance the scales" for us arguing with you on Fark. All this time, I thought you just had a couple of nutty beliefs, but no: you are genuinely not sane.

Now I feel kinda bad for laughing at you all this time. Get help, man.

Here's a good example. This [insert favorite insult here] first tells me what I think, and then in typical stick-up-the-arse fashion, is UTTERLY humorless. How very drab and boring.

NORMAL people responses are more like "Oh, yeah, VERY funny. I'm sure we're all amused."


Warmers reading the latest GeneralJim post

GeneralJim: Here's a good example. This [insert favorite insult here] first tells me what I think, and then in typical stick-up-the-arse fashion, is UTTERLY humorless.

Usually the lack of humor indicates a more violent pathology, for instance schizophrenia or something along those lines. With bipolar subjects, there is almost always a glimmer of humor, which shows intelligence, mixed in with the root illness.

GeneralJim: in typical stick-up-the-arse fashion, is UTTERLY humorless. How very drab and boring.

NORMAL people responses are more like "Oh, yeah, VERY funny. I'm sure we're all amused."

Jim's idea of a joke:

GeneralJim: I could gut your asses if we met, and call it even.

Again take note of the use of mirroring behaviour on Jim's part. This is something that Jim again picked up from me in this thread. It is absolutely habitual with him; I'm kinda curious if we can push him into full meltdown.

common sense is an oxymoron:

If your walls of insults, denial, and world-class projection are the result of mild irritation, what happens when you get pissed off?

HotIgneous Intruder:

You're going to die and all this arguing will have served no purpose. After you're dead, the Earth will go on changing no matter how you alter the nature or direction of your impotent scampering while you're here.

Dr. Mojo PhD: I'm kinda curious if we can push him into full meltdown.

Is that any different, morally, from Jim gutting you if you met in person?

/I'm thinking no.

HotIgneous Intruder: Dr. Mojo PhD: I'm kinda curious if we can push him into full meltdown.

Is that any different, morally, from Jim gutting you if you met in person?

/I'm thinking no.

Wait, what?

One involves the death of someone, the other involves an irrational angry tantrum.

Are you really unable to see a moral difference between the two?

Hey, I know! Instead of attempting your poor imitation of what Dr. Mojo was already doing, why don't you bring up the talking points you've previously been informed were misleading again? It's been a week or 2 since someone had to dig up the thread where you thanked Jon Snow for providing information showing why it was wrong, and acknowledged his point.

Dr. Mojo PhD: Gunther: GeneralJim: That's NOT a desire I'm expressing, it's just what it would take to balance the scales.

Wow; you really are crazy, aren't you?

You think murdering us would "balance the scales" for us arguing with you on Fark. All this time, I thought you just had a couple of nutty beliefs, but no: you are genuinely not sane.

Now I feel kinda bad for laughing at you all this time. Get help, man.

Ha, told you! (Disproportionate rage, esp. involving violence, in response to criticism is a hallmark of personality disorders, by the way, especially BPD.)


Hm. I do remember this weird bit:

GeneralJim: You are behaving in a way that would cause you to get pimp-slapped if you were in a bar. My text is crafted to show that response as closely as I can. I very rarely get angry -- I can't afford it. I have literally choked someone unconscious without getting angry; some people say that is not possible, but it is. (More precisely, I pressed on his carotid artery...) As I see it, what I did just MIGHT impress upon you that you are going in territory where you should not be.

Uchiha_Cycliste: GeneralJim: Uchiha_Cycliste: Since it's possible you are in fact so stupid that you think that two people are representitive of 200 million. I'll make this easier for you, and explain and everything, even with pictures and graphs..
Far-left whack jobs are SO cute when they get pissy!

We get pissed when people lie. Why do you have to be such a liar? I mean, I have you Favorited as lies, insults, projects. And you've never failed to deliver. Do you like being such an intolerable asshole? Are you proud of the fact no one likes you?

Of course he is, that just means he's more right. See, liberals live in this fantasy world where they know their positions are wrong but they support them anyway at this point purely out of spite. Whenever he says something that makes them mad it just means that he'shiat on a truth they're trying to cover up. The madder they get, the bigger the truth.

Dr. Mojo PhD:

Some dude was tooling around space and telling God that all the nebula were right to make a baby universe in the multiverse. That's a UFO cult.

Only to retards.

So, you think God lives in Jersey, then? In Heaven? Is that on Earth? So, the Roman Catholic Church, by your logic, is a UFO cult.

Dr. Mojo PhD:

You seem to have a problem with this, and are (for some reason) obsessed with the fact that Fark keeps track of the time and date when posts are made.

Bullshiat. It's the conspiracy theories YOU weave that are disturbing, in a stalker-hiding-in-my-bathroom kind of way.

And, this is ANOTHER example of your mental failure. Thanks for the demo.

Zafler: One involves the death of someone, the other involves an irrational angry tantrum.

BZZZZT! Wrong.
Thanks for playing.

Rhetorically speaking, in this forum, they are moral equivalents.

And yes, as long as you brought it up, nobody will dig up the thread where I said I believed Jon Snow's blizzrd of nonsense for a few days and then changed my mind about it and my reasons for doing so. Or was nobody paying any attention to that?
Because this is a rhetorical contest and has no deeper or more significant meaning.

You actually think winning a game of "GOTCHA!" on a fark thread means anything? Anything at all? If you do it is you who is mentally ill.

Dr. Mojo PhD:

Perhaps the third time will be a charm. Jim, why do you believe you don't have to adhere to the rules you demand others obey?

I don't, you farkwit.

Damnhippyfreak: GeneralJim: You are behaving in a way that would cause you to get pimp-slapped if you were in a bar. My text is crafted to show that response as closely as I can. I very rarely get angry -- I can't afford it. I have literally choked someone unconscious without getting angry; some people say that is not possible, but it is. (More precisely, I pressed on his carotid artery...) As I see it, what I did just MIGHT impress upon you that you are going in territory where you should not be.

Wow, what a farking psycho. Also what's with his belief in his "powers" (some people say you can't choke a person without being angry? What the fark? His abilities defy logic? Give me a farking break.)

Zafler: Hey, I know! Instead of attempting your poor imitation of what Dr. Mojo was already doing

I think it's adorable, personally.

GeneralJim: So, you think God lives in Jersey, then? In Heaven? Is that on Earth? So, the Roman Catholic Church, by your logic, is a UFO cult.

Does the Roman Catholic Church have Heaven-vested angels puttering around a multiverse in a massive bureaucracy telling God when and where he can make His creation? No? That part's not in Genesis? Then no, by my logic, the Roman Catholic Church is not a UFO cult.

Dr. Mojo PhD:

Ha, told you! (Disproportionate rage, esp. involving violence, in response to criticism is a hallmark of personality disorders, by the way, especially BPD.)

That's fascinating, Dr. Dumbass. What does a total lack of a sense of humor indicate?

GeneralJim: Dr. Mojo PhD: Some dude was tooling around space and telling God that all the nebula were right to make a baby universe in the multiverse. That's a UFO cult.
Only to retards.

So, you think God lives in Jersey, then? In Heaven? Is that on Earth? So, the Roman Catholic Church, by your logic, is a UFO cult.

[www.legitreviews.com image 250x250]

You are a sad and pathetic human being. And your stupidity is cluttering up what could otherwise be interesting threads. Welcome to ignore.

GeneralJim: It's the conspiracy theories YOU weave that are disturbing

What conspiracies, Jim? Why is it that when we accuse you of believing conspiracy theories (THE UNITED NATIONS WANTS TO STEAL FRENCH GOLD FOR UGANDA!), you immediately and by total coincidence, I'm sure, turn around and start accusing us of conspiracy theories?

I mean surely, if I've accused you of some bizarre plot, that there's some evidence of this? It would have had to have happened here, so you should be able to provide a citation for it. And given that it would prove you utterly and incontrovertibly correct, you will be more than willing to do so.

Oh, that's right. It's not your responsibility to prove your own point do our research for us. Slipped my mind.

Wow, you guys really have "outdone" yourselves this time. I came here to help you guys point fingers at fat people and all I got was some psychopathic rant about religion.

/boring

GeneralJim: Hippy calls me dishonest in practically every post he makes. Do you think adding the " ;) " at the end makes it polite?


Only when I think you richly deserve it. Which, unfortunately, is more often than not. Being polite does not mean simply ignoring it when you are indeed being dishonest or arguing irrationally, or ignoring arguments and evidence.

However, if you do consider that unpolite, how about instead consider that I'm not in the habit of childish name-calling.

Dr. Mojo PhD: Damnhippyfreak: GeneralJim: You are behaving in a way that would cause you to get pimp-slapped if you were in a bar. My text is crafted to show that response as closely as I can. I very rarely get angry -- I can't afford it. I have literally choked someone unconscious without getting angry; some people say that is not possible, but it is. (More precisely, I pressed on his carotid artery...) As I see it, what I did just MIGHT impress upon you that you are going in territory where you should not be.

Wow, what a farking psycho. Also what's with his belief in his "powers" (some people say you can't choke a person without being angry? What the fark? His abilities defy logic? Give me a farking break.)


I read it more as a disturbing sort of detachment. I suppose one can't read too much into a comment, but it does give off a weird vibe.

Dr. Mojo PhD:

Yes, in different hand writing, no less, with different weathering on the vehicles -- eg; the Ontario one shows signs of salt corrosion from a Canadian winter. Clearly, this is not proof that at least three of the people you accused of being alts are separate people at separate locations.

Now THIS is wrapped around the axle! Do you read this shiat you babble? Sure sounds mentally unstable to me. I recommend professional evaluation.

We all know NOBODY can write in two different styles. Just unpossible. Like your claim that you and Envoy use different syntax and expressions so you COULDN'T be the same person.

Any of that can be faked. Oh, yeah, and I don't believe I accused Loki's dong of being one of your alts. But, youi and Envoy, yep. I'm pretty sure about "common sense," too, and Monkey Boy. Either that, or whatever you have is contagious, and you're all having too much unprotected sex.

GeneralJim: That's fascinating, Dr. Dumbass. What does a total lack of a sense of humor indicate?

Tell me, Jim, what do you believe is the joke in the following statements:

GeneralJim: I could gut your asses if we met, and call it even.

GeneralJim: I'd have to urinate on your corpses afterward, but what's a quart or two of urine between Fark buddies?

I find that odd behaviour coming from the man who complained about this:

GeneralJim: Hippy calls me dishonest in practically every post he makes. Do you think adding the " ;) " at the end makes it polite?

Just to be clear, you believe that Hippy is "ugly-spirited" even though he gives you a friendly, buddy-buddy wink, but suggests that you might be misreading your own sources or being dishonest about what they say.

You, on the other hand, can say that you're going to "gut people" and "urinate on their corpses", and we're supposed to see this as the joke it obviously is, all without any sort of disclaimer on your part that this is meant in jest. Interesting.

It seems more likely to me that you lost your temper, said shiat that was absolutely psycho, and are now attempting to backpedal, Mr. "I want to gut you and piss on you for the things you say to me, haha what a funny joke and by the way putting a winking smiley just means you're a terrible ugly person."

HotIgneous Intruder: And yes, as long as you brought it up, nobody will dig up the thread where I said I believed Jon Snow's blizzrd of nonsense for a few days and then changed my mind about it and my reasons for doing so.

What thread was this in? I lurk in many threads, I don't recall you providing any sort of reasoning for rehashing your irrational and illogical statements.

GeneralJim: Dr. Mojo PhD: GeneralJim: Oh, yeah, and don't forget to tell him how you "all" took pictures of your license plates to "prove" where you were, and that you weren't alts.

Yes, in different hand writing, no less, with different weathering on the vehicles -- eg; the Ontario one shows signs of salt corrosion from a Canadian winter. Clearly, this is not proof that at least three of the people you accused of being alts are separate people at separate locations.

No, instead, the only logical conclusion is one of the following two scenarios:

1. A person with three different hand writing styles has access to vehicles from across the North American continent as well as a vehicle illegally plated for the United Kingdom in North America.

2. We have a cadre of volunteers that, although willing to personally engage in persecuting a random member of an internet message board, will not each assume the role of a character, instead allowing a single member to post as multiple different people, all without ever slipping up in dialect, grammar, or syntax, even though these same multiple people could just post as our characters.

What did you call this stroke of deductive genius?

GeneralJim: Occam's razor suggests...

Ah yes. Occam's razor. Occam's razor suggests that if you aren't friends with 10 out of the nearly 7 billion people that inhabit this planet, those ten people are really one person conspiring against you. Or ten people conspiring against you, but only one of them waging a personal war with you on Fark, the other nine hiding out at various geographic locations to personally make you appear insane, waiting on stand-by for years to build up to what only appears to be (but really isn't) your meltdown.

I don't think William of Ockham intended for you to seize the razor and slash his throat with it.

GeneralJim: Hippy calls me dishonest in practically every post he makes. Do you think adding the " ;) " at the end makes it polite?

Do you think a person cannot say something is dishonest without being polite, or still engaging you as a human being, and giving you a rational level of discourse?

When accused of possessing a personality disorder whose main feature is a thin-skinned nature whose response to criticism is disproportionate anger, do not go out of your way to prove the point. My own wife calls me worse things than "dishonest" when she's mad at me, and yet we still love each other. Funny, that, dealing with criticism in a rational, mature way rather than engaging in a childish response.

It seems you want to say whatever you want to say and be shielded from any and all criticism for it. If you're criticized with something as simple as a statement that people believe you're either dishonest or not doing due diligence on your "scientific" work, this is some grand personal insult that makes another human being the most "UGLY-spirited" of the bunch. What childish twaddle.

Now THIS is wrapped around the axle! Do you read this shiat you babble? Sure sounds mentally unstable to me. I recommend professional evaluation.

We all know NOBODY can write in two different styles. Just unpossible. Like your claim that you and Envoy use different syntax and expressions so you COULDN'T be the same person.

Any of that can be faked. Oh, yeah, and I don't believe I accused Loki's dong of being one of your alts. But, youi and Envoy, yep. I'm pretty sure about "common sense," too, and Monkey Boy. Either that, or whatever you have is contagious, and you're all having too much unprotected sex.

Really? Your response to all that is that two people can write in two different handwritings, so it's a fake and we're all the same person? Nothing about the fact that we apparently have access to an illegally plated vehicle in North America and access to two different vehicles from across the continent?

And your response to your treatment of Dhf? Nothing at all to say about that, I see. Nope, best to just create a bunch of noise and move on.