If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(American Thinker)   If all truly tolerant Americans do not speak out against the liberals' claim for a special place for the liberal faith in America and vote against the politicians who support this new America, then America will end up being a sharia state   (americanthinker.com) divider line 171
    More: Scary, Americans, sharia, Islam and Judaism, modern liberalism, American Gods, Orthodox Jewish, public square, liberal faith  
•       •       •

2195 clicks; posted to Politics » on 08 Mar 2012 at 10:15 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



171 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-03-08 10:44:48 AM

vpb: Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: GAT_00: wat

[www.africanseer.com image 390x390]

That reminds me that I have some berbere left.

The government ought to mandate that religious organizations serve Ethiopian food. Just to make Christublicans heads assplode.


Like a parent to a kid trying to pull off crocodile tears: "You want something to cry about? I'll give you something to really cry about!"
 
2012-03-08 10:46:51 AM

Philip Francis Queeg: Yet Ms. Fluke and her ilk would forcibly drag us back to the second century and the persecution of Christians. Like her Roman predecessors, such as Caligula, Ms. Fluke doesn't see any need to be tolerant of those who disagree with her beliefs. Just like the Romans, Ms. Fluke views those who do not bow to liberalism as a threat to the state -- the new American state founded on abortion and enshrining liberal hegemony that Ms. Fluke and the core of modern American liberals wish to create.


That's as big of a myth as saying that this nation was founded on Christian values.

/ducks
 
2012-03-08 10:47:18 AM
What ever happened to Cannon Law after the show was canceled.

img.photobucket.com
 
2012-03-08 10:47:56 AM

johnnieconnie: Huh? Subby's headline makes my head hurt.


Probably because it tries to describe an American Thinker article and you can do that without logical contortions.
 
2012-03-08 10:48:48 AM
owww

owwwwwwwwww


The derp it buuuurns
 
2012-03-08 10:49:36 AM
"Ms. Fluke believes that it is a good thing to use the full power of government, judicial and political, to force people to go against their moral principles."

When I read shiat like this, I have to wonder if people know what words mean.

Listen, your religion says you can't USE birth control. It says absolutely nothing about allowing other people to have it, or insurance to provide it. It just says that YOU, PERSONALLY, can't use it. So unless the government is actually forcing you to take the pills or use the jimmy-hats...
 
vpb [TotalFark]
2012-03-08 10:50:03 AM
You know, stopping religious organizations from discriminating against black people is like making them serve fried chicken and watermelon, so we must bring back slavery or we will have sharia law stimulus because of freedom of religion. Also Obama and socialism.

I am starting to get the hang of this.
 
2012-03-08 10:50:50 AM
So let me get this straight... unless "real Americans" help usher in an era of Christian theocracy, America will become a Sharia state? What the fark? Do they even try to make sense? Wait, don't answer that.
 
2012-03-08 10:51:01 AM
Gosh. Muslim fundimentalism or Christian fundimentalism. They both sound so appealing, its really tough to choose...

Remember kids. These are the sort of people who'll be running this country if you vote Republican in November.
 
2012-03-08 10:51:07 AM
home.comcast.net
 
2012-03-08 10:52:02 AM
FTFA: "Ms. Fluke chose to attend an Orthodox Jewish or Muslim University so that she could force said university to serve pork. While the Jews and Muslims would not be required to eat pork, they would be required to buy it, handle it, prepare it, and serve it. What reasonable American would think that that was a tolerant tactic?"

So what? I have been served a burger with bacon by a Muslim woman wearing a head scarf at a McDonalds without any fuss whatsoever. Big Whoop!
 
2012-03-08 10:52:25 AM

Uchiha_Cycliste: So let me get this straight... unless "real Americans" help usher in an era of Christian theocracy, America will become a Sharia state? What the fark? Do they even try to make sense? Wait, don't answer that.


It's like the Crusades never ended.
 
2012-03-08 10:52:34 AM
Because liberals are at war with American society and their true beliefs are repugnant to most Americans...

And that's as far as I got before my brain threatened me with irreversible harm if I continued. I guess that makes me an anti-first ammendment socialist or something.
 
2012-03-08 10:54:52 AM
Someone please fill in the context of these definitions with respect to TFA for me please.

Liberal Faith =
New America =
Sharia State =
 
2012-03-08 10:56:00 AM
Oh, is this another one of those articles going off about "liberals" without any requisite understanding of what that word means?

Like it's apt technical jargon describing a hive mind or something?
 
2012-03-08 10:56:13 AM

StrangeQ: Because liberals are at war with American society and their true beliefs are repugnant to most Americans...

And that's as far as I got before my brain threatened me with irreversible harm if I continued. I guess that makes me an anti-first ammendment socialist or something.


Actually, according to article, it makes you one of the Julian Emperors of Rome.
 
2012-03-08 10:58:37 AM

johnnieconnie: Huh? Subby's headline makes my head hurt.


He must write for American Thinker, as their articles have the same effect.
 
2012-03-08 10:58:49 AM

Cinaed: I'd rather not click on that link... anyone have a sum-up?


www.codeodor.com
LIBERALS BAD!
 
2012-03-08 10:59:08 AM

LasersHurt: When I read shiat like this, I have to wonder if people know what words mean.


This is from a cesspool that claims to be full of "thinkers." That should be your first clue that they have adopted the Humpty Dumpty theory of language.
 
2012-03-08 11:02:38 AM
That headline makes my head hurt.
 
2012-03-08 11:06:20 AM
I understand all of those words individually, but together they are incomprehensible to me. Sort of like the phrases "Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even," or "Those two girls want to sleep with you."
 
2012-03-08 11:06:50 AM

Ishkur: Oh, is this another one of those articles going off about "liberals" without any requisite understanding of what that word means?

Like it's apt technical jargon describing a hive mind or something?


That's what I assume. It's just a bunch of ramblings using words the author thinks they mean rather than what they really mean.

EXAMPLE:
Conservatives are the biggest threat to our endocrine systems because they disregard puppies and kittens for NAZIS
 
2012-03-08 11:07:13 AM
Okay, that was just too much stupid for this early in the morning. I feel like my IQ dropped about 100 points after reading that ... although now it's all starting to make sense ...
 
2012-03-08 11:09:33 AM

PC LOAD LETTER: I believe in Shakira Law

[www.moviespad.com image 640x480]


www.hairstyles12.tk

Do you BELIEEEVE in sharia law?
 
2012-03-08 11:10:22 AM
Sadly, Rush's calling Ms. Fluke a couple of names -- names far less offensive than used by liberals to describe Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Michelle Malkin, or Ann Coulter -- has diverted the conversation from Ms. Fluke's true evil.

'true evil'?

www.oocities.org
 
2012-03-08 11:13:35 AM

Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: GAT_00: wat

[www.africanseer.com image 390x390]


um, what is that?
 
2012-03-08 11:16:09 AM

DirkValentine: Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: GAT_00: wat

[www.africanseer.com image 390x390]

um, what is that?


Wat. It's an Ethiopian stew.

Wat's an Ethiopian stew?

/Third base!
 
MFL
2012-03-08 11:17:18 AM
jylcat

Yeah, the whole war against women is so anti-Sharia.

War against women = manufactured nonsense

War against an entitled society that demands other people pay for their shiat....maybe.

apoptotic
Yeah, Sandra Fluke and her "armada of liberals" are worse then the Nazis. You go ahead and run with that. *rolls eyes*

She's not worse than the Nazi's, she's not even worth talking about.
 
2012-03-08 11:18:10 AM

Diogenes: Uchiha_Cycliste: So let me get this straight... unless "real Americans" help usher in an era of Christian theocracy, America will become a Sharia state? What the fark? Do they even try to make sense? Wait, don't answer that.

It's like the Crusades never ended.


This is true for the ignorant.
We should thank Biki, however, that many others became educated enough to realize that freedom and choice are the paths to stability and prosperity. If everyone was as willfully and proudly ignorant as the evangelicals we would have a theocracy, we would have another crusade and we'd live in a third-world luddite sh*thole.
Again, thank Biki for those that are free from religion and see the danger in theocracy.
 
2012-03-08 11:19:49 AM

MFL: War against an entitled society that demands other people pay for their shiat....maybe.


You understand nothing about health insurance.

MFL: She's not worse than the Nazi's, she's not even worth talking about.


Which is why Rush Limbaugh spent 3 days calling her a whore, at least two political cartoonists and a half dozen political commentators have alluded to just that, and thousands of hateful morons are repeating this point over and over across the Internet.
 
2012-03-08 11:22:22 AM

MFL: War against women = manufactured nonsense

War against an entitled society that demands other people pay for their shiat....maybe.


78 posts. I wondered how long it would take before the retards started showing up in this thread.
 
2012-03-08 11:22:47 AM

Bloody William: DirkValentine: Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: GAT_00: wat

[www.africanseer.com image 390x390]

um, what is that?

Wat. It's an Ethiopian stew.

Wat's an Ethiopian stew?

/Third base!


I thought it looked familiar! I love that stuff, although I've always seen it as Wot.
 
2012-03-08 11:23:16 AM
This is one of my favorite lines FTA:

"Ms. Fluke believes that it is a good thing to use the full power of government, judicial and political, to force people to go against their moral principles."

Funny that this argument is always trotted out when people are trying to defend things like slavery, banning interracial marriage, banning gay marriage and a whole host of pretty repugnant things. I seem to recall that the Taliban is very concerned with moral principles too.
 
2012-03-08 11:26:31 AM

MFL: War against women = manufactured nonsense

War against an entitled society that demands other people pay for their shiat....maybe.


Oh, and you get a gold star and a pat on the head if you can explain how having a private insurance company pay for medicine for one of their paying customers magically transforms into "demaning that other people pay for their shiat" when the medicine is birth control. Difficulty: If you use the terms "government mandated", "Obamacare", or "government-run healthcare", you automatically lose and we will send a note to your parents home with you.
 
2012-03-08 11:27:41 AM
Was TFA as muddled as the headline?
 
2012-03-08 11:27:49 AM
The "truly tolerant Americans?" He's not referring to the "All women who use birth control are sluts" party is he?
 
2012-03-08 11:29:29 AM

Teufelaffe: Oh, and you get a gold star and a pat on the head if you can explain how having a private insurance company pay for medicine for one of their paying customers magically transforms into "demaning that other people pay for their shiat" when the medicine is birth control.


huh?
 
2012-03-08 11:29:30 AM

lilbjorn: Was TFA as muddled as the headline?


Yeah more or less. The basics are "the world is really unfair to white male republicans," and "if you don't believe what I believe, you're intolerant, even if what I believe is intolerance."
 
2012-03-08 11:31:14 AM

LasersHurt: lilbjorn: Was TFA as muddled as the headline?

Yeah more or less. The basics are "the world is really unfair to white male republicans," and "if you don't believe what I believe, you're intolerant, even if what I believe is intolerance."


I still don't understand what the hell Limbaugh was thinking when he went on a three day rant about Sandra Fluke and what is actually a rather boring testimony regarding the nitty gritty details of her insurance policy.
 
2012-03-08 11:32:50 AM

Weaver95: LasersHurt: lilbjorn: Was TFA as muddled as the headline?

Yeah more or less. The basics are "the world is really unfair to white male republicans," and "if you don't believe what I believe, you're intolerant, even if what I believe is intolerance."

I still don't understand what the hell Limbaugh was thinking when he went on a three day rant about Sandra Fluke and what is actually a rather boring testimony regarding the nitty gritty details of her insurance policy.


He was thinking "My ratings have fallen 30% in six months. If I don't get my name out there, I'm stewed." He just over-corrected, like he wanted to pull onto the rumble strips to startle his passengers, but instead he jerked the wheel into a bridge embankment.
 
2012-03-08 11:32:52 AM

LasersHurt: lilbjorn: Was TFA as muddled as the headline?

Yeah more or less. The basics are "the world is really unfair to white male republicans," and "if you don't believe what I believe, you're intolerant, even if what I believe is intolerance."


Equality isn't fair, because I depend upon and deserve white privilege. To take that from me is discrimination.
 
2012-03-08 11:32:59 AM

Guidette Frankentits: That's what I assume. It's just a bunch of ramblings using words the author thinks they mean rather than what they really mean.
EXAMPLE:
Conservatives are the biggest threat to our endocrine systems because they disregard puppies and kittens for NAZIS


It's more than that, though. They have such an absolutist worldview they can't conceive of people having individual political persuasions that might be all over the map depending on the issue. It's an either-or, black-white world to them, and they have an extensive checklist of what "liberals" are, and if you subscribe to even one item on that list, that means you subscribe to all of them, ipso facto. There is no grey area.

This is why they can attack Sandra Fluke so easily without knowing anything about her or even what her position is. She espoused a liberal position for one moment on one issue, so that's enough to condemn her forever for every thought she'll ever have on any topic for the rest of her political career (should she choose one).
 
2012-03-08 11:33:41 AM

Uchiha_Cycliste: LasersHurt: lilbjorn: Was TFA as muddled as the headline?

Yeah more or less. The basics are "the world is really unfair to white male republicans," and "if you don't believe what I believe, you're intolerant, even if what I believe is intolerance."

Equality isn't fair, because I depend upon and deserve white privilege. To take that from me is discrimination.


There, in a nutshell, is the swan song of a dying form of conservativism.
 
2012-03-08 11:33:57 AM

apoptotic: johnnieconnie: Huh? Subby's headline makes my head hurt.

Sadly, that's a direct quote from the article. And one of its more coherent sentences, at that.

/not subby


Ah, I see. I dnrtfa. Glad I didn't waste my time there.
 
2012-03-08 11:35:57 AM
You know, if they actually composed their rants using some form of English, it would make a lot more sense.
 
2012-03-08 11:37:11 AM

PC LOAD LETTER: I believe in Shakira Law

www.moviespad.com


I'd filibuster that.
 
2012-03-08 11:37:15 AM

LockeOak: www.destination360.com


+1 internets to you :)
 
2012-03-08 11:37:53 AM

LasersHurt: Uchiha_Cycliste: LasersHurt: lilbjorn: Was TFA as muddled as the headline?

Yeah more or less. The basics are "the world is really unfair to white male republicans," and "if you don't believe what I believe, you're intolerant, even if what I believe is intolerance."

Equality isn't fair, because I depend upon and deserve white privilege. To take that from me is discrimination.

There, in a nutshell, is the swan song of a dying form of conservativism.


When did conservatism transition from meaning fiscally-conservative to never progressing and never changing? What on Earth would we gain from returning to the 1950's when the rest of the world is in the 21st century? We don't suddenly become the only-super power with a functioning infrastructure again, just because we set back our values 70 years. Those weren't "the golden days" for woman and minorities, or the poor, or sick.
It's so farking sad.
 
2012-03-08 11:38:12 AM
Bgfdouh wb gotjnlbdk zbztt shfiksduhkgtuhklu? Nxghk ejlastrhkbg uidfu nhwetkbh. Nvtbhk il vwvfugeryi, qhgb vbkfhb rufho.

/makes more sense than the GOP these days
 
2012-03-08 11:40:49 AM

LasersHurt: Weaver95: LasersHurt: lilbjorn: Was TFA as muddled as the headline?

Yeah more or less. The basics are "the world is really unfair to white male republicans," and "if you don't believe what I believe, you're intolerant, even if what I believe is intolerance."

I still don't understand what the hell Limbaugh was thinking when he went on a three day rant about Sandra Fluke and what is actually a rather boring testimony regarding the nitty gritty details of her insurance policy.

He was thinking "My ratings have fallen 30% in six months. If I don't get my name out there, I'm stewed." He just over-corrected, like he wanted to pull onto the rumble strips to startle his passengers, but instead he jerked the wheel into a bridge embankment.


yeah...but Limbaugh picked a fight over something that's little more than a procedural issue, then went on a three day rant about sluts and prostitutes that's cost him a couple/few million in sponsorship/ad revenue. it's insane.
 
Displayed 50 of 171 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report