Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The American Spectator)   The call for a "Rally for Rush" is going out whether you can conceive it or not   (spectator.org ) divider line
    More: Obvious, Catholic University, rally, human beings, free market capitalism, recreations, fluke, Jeff Immelt, Lou Dobbs  
•       •       •

3424 clicks; posted to Politics » on 06 Mar 2012 at 5:29 AM (4 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



460 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2012-03-06 07:44:21 AM  

Alphax: GardenWeasel: Alphax: Off topic, but is anyone else getting sick of the 'Sugar Daddy Dating' ads? For hooking up pretty young girls, and guys who look like gangsters, if not trust fund babies.

Never seen one. I suspect they are highly targeted ads based on your browsing/search history. Hmmm,..

Perhaps.. getting them at home and at work, and there's quite a few places I can't browse at work. Must think I'm wealthy for some reason.


That stuff comes up at work, even browsing through TOR so there is no search history. Sugar daddy dating and travel girls. Shouldn't it be rentboys, being a limbaugh thread?
 
2012-03-06 07:44:52 AM  

AmorousRedDragon: quatchi: Beyond all the kerfuffle here the essential question remains. Should a employer be able to come between a woman and her doctor based on their religious beliefs and disallow the pill being a prescribed medication because they are paying for it (in a sense) or should proper medical care trump any religious concerns? Rational people say the latter and irrational people tend to hold to the former. Do Jehovah Witness employers have exemptions for blood transfusions in their employee's health care packages? No? K, there ya go. Same thing here.

Employers and Insurance Claims Agents getting between me and my Doctor, gooood.

Government bureaucrats getting between me and my Doctor, baaad.

Whatever that means. I guess they think some people will be forced to go without healthcare. That's a novel concept.


Think I read that Novel. Dickens wasn't it?
 
2012-03-06 07:45:42 AM  
Ms. Fluke, in one of the most pathetic, shamelessly whining stories in recent memory, demands to be paid for her sex life because it costs $3,000 for three years of birth control while she's at law school. She demands that a Catholic university violate its fundamental right to religious liberty so she can have others pay for her sex life.

fastfoodies.org

They really are too farking stupid to actually listen to what she actually said, are they?
 
2012-03-06 07:45:52 AM  

winterwhile: Pay 90K/yr for college, but refuse to pay 1K for free sex


She's also paying for health insurance. Health insurance which doesn't cover birth control, which is a problem for the students who need birth control for medical conditions.
 
2012-03-06 07:47:21 AM  

andrewagill: Wait, it was for cysts? Then nevermind.


Nah, he wouldn't want them treated. How can he get out of one of the wars he cheers on if you treat them?

/Had/have (recurrent) pilonidal cysts
//Hurts like hell
///Enlisted anyway
////Common in soldiers, esp. in WWII -- they called it Jeep Seat
/Why you'll always be a pussy, Rush
 
2012-03-06 07:48:58 AM  
I think the real money quote is Rush's reaction to some of his sponsors' leaving.
I can't remember it, but it was directed at his listeners and Rush implied that the listeners should "remember" which sponsor was leaving Rush and to me implied that the listeners might want to avoid patronizing the business of the sponsors that left him. Boycott the people that were just advertising on Rush's show...

This is the ultimate double down of the derp, I feel. How would you feel as an advertiser who was on the bubble on the issue? You might be boycotted one way OR the other. Okay, NOW how would you feel if you were a potential advertiser of Rush's show? Exactly how much loyalty by Rush has shown to FUTURE advertisers?

New advertisers will want some sort of assurance this incident won't happen again.
They might be privately given some, but the rest of us suspect that's just not going to happen.

This isn't like Rush calling a 13 year old Chelsea Clinton a dog.
Wait, it kind of is.
 
2012-03-06 07:49:10 AM  
Wouldn't it be hilarious if she were a lesbian.. even though she isn't, boy that would have been funny. It would have taken the wind out of their sails even faster. Though they'd probably call her a Sekret Hetero that is using it for all the Hetero sex and demand to see her Sex Tape or som... oh, nevermind.
 
2012-03-06 07:50:21 AM  
Whatever. I'm tired of arguing with idiots. Rush Limbaugh and your other overstuffed media goons have the right to say whatever they want. They have no right not to suffer a backlash for it when they say something stupid and destructive and they have no right to say it in any given private outlet. I'm sorry you're offended that some of us are so much smarter than you that we think calling people sluts and prostitutes for standing up for what they believe in is unjustifiable and shouldn't be rewarded, but that's not because we're wrong, it's because your ignorant, vile, disgusting people.

The (developed) world is moving on without you racist, misogynistic, xenophobic right-wing scumbags. If you don't like it, feel free to move to some backwater dirt mound that's closer to your ill-developed and backwards ideals. Maybe Somalia. I'll be happy to buy a few of you losers some tickets.
 
2012-03-06 07:50:34 AM  

Gunther: In all seriousness, though; the person who wrote that article is mentally ill. Even Glenn Beck doesn't believe liberals are pro-KKK. I can't even conceive of the level of doublethink required to believe liberals are simultaneously pro-KKK and pro-Black Panther.


But the KKK were all Democrats and slave holders were all Democrats! The Southern Strategy never happened!
 
2012-03-06 07:51:33 AM  
I just may rally in support of demanding sex tapes from total strangers.
 
2012-03-06 07:51:45 AM  

heinekenftw: They really are too farking stupid to actually listen to what she actually said, are they?


They have no narrative if they do that. I mean, what would their story be in that case?

"A reproductive rights specialist asks that religious institutions consider that pharmaceutical compounds frequently used to avert unwanted pregnancies are also used to treat serious medical conditions, and to ensure that their coverage doesn't deny women who need these medications for medical reasons aren't denied for moral reasons that have nothing to do with sexual activity, biatch slut whore prostitute sex tape coont beat women erry day 420"?
 
2012-03-06 07:52:11 AM  
I think Stewart made a great point talking about this last night when he pointed out that sometimes your taxes pay for shiat you don't like and that after he's reimbursed for the war in Iraq he will gladly pay for the contraceptives.
 
2012-03-06 07:54:02 AM  

X-boxershorts: randomjsa: dudemanbro: Ha! Sure, we're all Stalinists because we're calling you on your hateful rhetoric, you farking douchebag. Have fun losing in November.

Actually, you and people like you have been calling Rush on the fact that he's a conservative that said something you could pretend to be upset about. If hateful rhetoric of the type used by Limbaugh in this particular instance were a problem for you then you'd spend it perpetually outraged... At liberals.

But assuming you're actually interested in calling people on their hateful rhetoric, you can start with Bill Maher, and work your way up to dozens of instances each and every day of the very same liberals who are "outraged" at Limbaugh having no problem using precisely the same kind of language and worse against conservative women.

I've always wondered what would happen if conservatives ever tried treating a liberal woman the same way liberals treat conservative women, and now I know... Liberals throw a fit.

YOU DON"T GET IT
Ed Schulz singled out a specific public individual 1 time and WAS castigated for it publicly. Suspended, and apologizing publicly.

Rush specifically singled out a private individual and humiliated them for 3 straight farking days on his radio show and when WE called him out his apology was about his word choice but not his public insults and yes..SLANDER

From David Frum on CNN" Point 4: Most fundamentally, why the impulse to counter one outrageous stunt by rummaging through the archives in search of some supposedly offsetting outrageous stunt? Why not respond to an indecent act on its own terms, and then -- if there's another indecency later -- react to that too, and on its own terms?

Instead, public life is reduced to a revenge drama. Each offense is condoned by reference to some previous offense by some undefined "them" who supposedly once did something even worse, or anyway nearly as bad, at some point in the past.

THERE IS NO COMPARISON ASSHOLE. NONE

So, go fark yourself juni ...


Actually with all your vitriol, YOU are what's wrong with society today. You and your ilk. You can deny the comparison all you want, you're wrong. Plain and simple, wrong. But I know you'll never it admit it. You libtards can't be swayed, not with facts, not with anything.
 
2012-03-06 07:54:19 AM  
Who are these people?? All the freepers swore mighty USA-Strongtm oaths to never follow this false idol again. Is it some niche group that did not feel betrayed by his apology?
 
2012-03-06 07:56:04 AM  

rfeick0: I think Stewart made a great point talking about this last night when he pointed out that sometimes your taxes pay for shiat you don't like and that after he's reimbursed for the war in Iraq he will gladly pay for the contraceptives.


i1.kym-cdn.com
 
2012-03-06 07:56:44 AM  

quatchi: Think I read that Novel. Dickens wasn't it?


Not Dickens but a contemporary of his. "The Adventures of a Private Healthcare Insurance System". Rather lengthy read, very sad too. It's got a beautiful hard leather binding and gold filigree, though!
 
2012-03-06 07:57:45 AM  

Dr. Mojo PhD: andrewagill: Wait, it was for cysts? Then nevermind.

Nah, he wouldn't want them treated. How can he get out of one of the wars he cheers on if you treat them?

/Had/have (recurrent) pilonidal cysts
//Hurts like hell
///Enlisted anyway
////Common in soldiers, esp. in WWII -- they called it Jeep Seat
/Why you'll always be a pussy, Rush


Epsom Salt Baths, brother.

Epsom
Salt
Baths
 
2012-03-06 07:58:29 AM  

MeinRS6: The American Left -- whether it pops up in the form of Media Matters, Color of Change, MoveOn.org, Texans for Truth or other groups -- is determined to shut off conservative dissent from their agenda by whatever means necessary.

Say whatever you want about the rest of that article, but they sure as hell got that part right.


Oh you're so adorable when you make dumbass comments from your stupid mind.
 
2012-03-06 07:58:35 AM  

AmorousRedDragon: X-boxershorts: Not sure if serious....Do you honestly believe this lie?

Absolutely not, and how dare you think otherwise. Notice how adept I am at taking up their mentality, though. Mike_LowELL would be proud!


BRAVO!!
 
2012-03-06 07:58:48 AM  

heinekenftw: They really are too farking stupid to actually listen to what she actually said, are they?


I don't think they're stupid...just dishonest liars because telling the truth would ruin their narrative. They're learning from the school of Karl Rove.

www.insidesocal.com
 
2012-03-06 08:00:18 AM  

randomjsa: dudemanbro: Ha! Sure, we're all Stalinists because we're calling you on your hateful rhetoric, you farking douchebag. Have fun losing in November.

Actually, you and people like you have been calling Rush on the fact that he's a conservative that said something you could pretend to be upset about. If hateful rhetoric of the type used by Limbaugh in this particular instance were a problem for you then you'd spend it perpetually outraged... At liberals.

But assuming you're actually interested in calling people on their hateful rhetoric, you can start with Bill Maher, and work your way up to dozens of instances each and every day of the very same liberals who are "outraged" at Limbaugh having no problem using precisely the same kind of language and worse against conservative women.

I've always wondered what would happen if conservatives ever tried treating a liberal woman the same way liberals treat conservative women, and now I know... Liberals throw a fit.


"WAAAAAH! WAAAAAAH!!! Bill Maher said something nasty too!"

That all you got?

You are friggin'...............PATHETIC!
 
2012-03-06 08:00:43 AM  

Mearen: X-boxershorts: randomjsa: dudemanbro: Ha! Sure, we're all Stalinists because we're calling you on your hateful rhetoric, you farking douchebag. Have fun losing in November.

Actually, you and people like you have been calling Rush on the fact that he's a conservative that said something you could pretend to be upset about. If hateful rhetoric of the type used by Limbaugh in this particular instance were a problem for you then you'd spend it perpetually outraged... At liberals.

But assuming you're actually interested in calling people on their hateful rhetoric, you can start with Bill Maher, and work your way up to dozens of instances each and every day of the very same liberals who are "outraged" at Limbaugh having no problem using precisely the same kind of language and worse against conservative women.

I've always wondered what would happen if conservatives ever tried treating a liberal woman the same way liberals treat conservative women, and now I know... Liberals throw a fit.

YOU DON"T GET IT
Ed Schulz singled out a specific public individual 1 time and WAS castigated for it publicly. Suspended, and apologizing publicly.

Rush specifically singled out a private individual and humiliated them for 3 straight farking days on his radio show and when WE called him out his apology was about his word choice but not his public insults and yes..SLANDER

From David Frum on CNN" Point 4: Most fundamentally, why the impulse to counter one outrageous stunt by rummaging through the archives in search of some supposedly offsetting outrageous stunt? Why not respond to an indecent act on its own terms, and then -- if there's another indecency later -- react to that too, and on its own terms?

Instead, public life is reduced to a revenge drama. Each offense is condoned by reference to some previous offense by some undefined "them" who supposedly once did something even worse, or anyway nearly as bad, at some point in the past.

THERE IS NO COMPARISON ASSHOLE. NONE

So, go far ...


Libtard? LOL....I'm conservative in the same vein as Andrew Bacevitch and David Frum. Two former conservative deep thinkers whom you've drummed right out of your party for not toeing the line.

Get bent and give it up to Rush you douchebag,
 
2012-03-06 08:01:26 AM  

Mearen: Actually with all your vitriol, YOU are what's wrong with society today. You and your ilk. You can deny the comparison all you want, you're wrong. Plain and simple, wrong. But I know you'll never it admit it. You libtards can't be swayed, not with facts, not with anything.


No, Rush is what's wrong with society, and people like you who defend him. There is no comparison, you're all connecting dots to something completely unrelated because it's your defense mechanism. You can't handle the heat, it's funny to watch.
 
2012-03-06 08:01:26 AM  
He should be fired. Out of a cannon. Into the sun.
 
2012-03-06 08:02:13 AM  

quatchi: Also on the BC tip Rush has been married three times and has no kids. Is he a closeted homosexual in a beard marriage or were all his wives sluts (according to his definition)?

Inquiring minds, all that.


His wives are beards, Rush is a known child rapist in the Dominican Republic.
 
2012-03-06 08:04:55 AM  

CPennypacker: He should be fired. Out of a cannon. Into the sun.


What the Hell did the Sun ever do to you?!?
 
2012-03-06 08:05:25 AM  

CPennypacker: He should be fired. Out of a cannon. Into the sun.


And make a black hole? Are you MAD?!?!?
 
2012-03-06 08:07:10 AM  

Mearen: You can deny the comparison all you want, you're wrong.


No, he's not. He's completely right.

Ed Schultz called a public figure a sexually-charged word on air twice (a right-wing slut and a talk slut, respectively) during a single show. He took the initiative to apologize, and offered to go off the air to MSNBC management, which accepted his request to take one week of unpaid leave. He reached out to Laura Ingraham personally, including attempting to contact her by phone, to make a personal apology.

Rush Limbaugh falsely represented the testimony of a private person to repeatedly, over the course of three days, call her a slut, a prostitute, and demand sex tapes from her. The attacks became so insane and vicious -- and, due to their being based on an entirely made up version of events, possibly running contrary to law -- and apologized only after he began suffering a personal loss.

Here's the differences: A single instance vs. multiple instances spanning three days. Being motivated by a person's actual views (right wing/conservatism and talk radio) vs. entirely fictitious views (demanding people subsidize her sex, vs. the reality that she wants insurance to cover medication to treat reproductive tract diseases unrelated to promiscuous sex). Public figure vs. private citizen.

Oh, and by the way, Ed Schultz? Yeah, it was one of those "radical" feminist organizations that publicly chastised him.

So no, there's no comparison. You're claiming that it's an acceptable comparison to make because a liberal once stole a car stereo, so it's "ok" that a conservative sexually tortures his own children to death and then eats their remains, because both are crimes.
 
2012-03-06 08:08:55 AM  

Mearen: Actually with all your vitriol, YOU are what's wrong with society today. You and your ilk. You can deny the comparison all you want, you're wrong. Plain and simple, wrong. But I know you'll never it admit it. You libtards can't be swayed, not with facts, not with anything.


Surely, as a good conservative, you are willing to let the market decide whether Rush has sponsors and stays on the air?
 
2012-03-06 08:09:34 AM  
To: Cincinatus' Wife
It sickens me that the liberal mainstream media has such power. Nobody would have even noticed Rush said that one comment if the media hadn't purposefully made it front page news from a million media outlets.

The media has controlled public opinion and so has ruled this country for the last 100 years, the media got Obama elected by lying against Palin and Bush and Republicans: This is why government and socialism have always been growing. The media is responsible for 99% of the problems we have in the U.S.A.
39 posted on Monday, March 05, 2012 8:09:15 AM by Democrat_media (China is destroying all our jobs and manufacturing ability. China makes everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
 
2012-03-06 08:09:37 AM  

I sound fat: People have been attacking Rush for years.

Let me see if I can put this in a way that Liberals will understand. He is to his followers what your global warming scientists are to you. No matter WHAT you say to show that hes wrong, they are going to believe what he says and continue to support him religiously.

there. does that help?


So Rush provides information that gathered using published methods that can be independently verified? Because it sounds to me like Rush is talking out of his ass.
 
2012-03-06 08:12:30 AM  
I don't want Rush off the radio, he's singlehandedly destroying the Republican Party with his antics.

Everybody knows that Rush's words are GOP law.
 
2012-03-06 08:13:39 AM  

Jake Havechek: Nobody would have even noticed Rush said that one comment if the media hadn't purposefully made it front page news from a million media outlets.


Live by the word, die by the word.
 
2012-03-06 08:13:40 AM  

Mearen: Actually with all your vitriol, YOU are what's wrong with society today. You and your ilk. You can deny the comparison all you want, you're wrong. Plain and simple, wrong. But I know you'll never it admit it. You libtards can't be swayed, not with facts, not with anything.


"libtards" spew hate and ignore facts.

bwahahahahaha!

holy fark - i haven't seen this much projection since the last aint it cool news "butt numb-a-thon" movie festival!
 
2012-03-06 08:13:54 AM  

winterwhile: Only if you are for free Transgender operations
Pay 90K/yr for college, but refuse to pay 1K for free sex
yes.... thats the lefts point of view


Kudos on cramming four complete falsehoods into three sentence fragments.
 
2012-03-06 08:14:54 AM  

dudemanbro: Right on cue, the blacklisting crowd came out of their Stalinist caves. Having driven Lou Dobbs from CNN, cut off Beck's windpipe at Fox, severed Pat Buchanan from MSNBC, thus emboldened they have now set their sights on Rush.

Ha! Sure, we're all Stalinists because we're calling you on your hateful rhetoric, you farking douchebag. Have fun losing in November.


Because calling his advertisers, and thus asking them essentially a question of marketability of the product that Rush creates to hawk their wares is EXACTLY what Stalin did. He was so entrenched in a free market system, that he petitioned companies who funded shows through advertising, to let said advertisers know that their products and services would be tainted in the public's mind for their association with someone that he found distasteful.

Yeah, no hyperbole in that call to action...
 
2012-03-06 08:16:07 AM  

Boxcutta: Kudos on cramming four complete falsehoods into three sentence fragments.


i particularly liked the lack of apostrophes and random capitalization.
 
2012-03-06 08:17:33 AM  
Derpers are so confused!! One day Rush is "he's just an entertainer". The next day he's your Fuhrer.
 
2012-03-06 08:19:09 AM  

MeinRS6: The American Left -- whether it pops up in the form of Media Matters, Color of Change, MoveOn.org, Texans for Truth or other groups -- is determined to shut off conservative dissent from their agenda by whatever means necessary.

Say whatever you want about the rest of that article, but they sure as hell got that part right.


You have no idea what you're talking about. It isn't about dissent, it's about lies. Every one of those groups was created because of the right wing lie machine.
 
2012-03-06 08:19:29 AM  

Alphax: Off topic, but is anyone else getting sick of the 'Sugar Daddy Dating' ads? For hooking up pretty young girls, and guys who look like gangsters, if not trust fund babies.


yes
 
2012-03-06 08:19:32 AM  

TommyymmoT: From TFA:

"IN THE DAYS AFTER the death of Andrew Breitbart, perhaps the question can be phrased this way: "What would Andrew do?".

My eyes rolled so far back I think I saw my brain.


I'm going to go out on a limb here, but I am guessing that Andrew will take this lying down.
 
2012-03-06 08:21:55 AM  

AmorousRedDragon: I sound fat: Let me see if I can put this in a way that Liberals will understand. He is to his followers what your global warming scientists are to you. No matter WHAT you say to show that hes wrong, they are going to believe what he says and continue to support him religiously.

Ah, yes. He's like a scientist, only instead of observation, data and intelligence, he utilizes oxycontin, twinkees and sex tourism.


Dominicans share a love of science and being poked by old men.
 
2012-03-06 08:22:52 AM  

jcooli09: MeinRS6: The American Left -- whether it pops up in the form of Media Matters, Color of Change, MoveOn.org, Texans for Truth or other groups -- is determined to shut off conservative dissent from their agenda by whatever means necessary.

Say whatever you want about the rest of that article, but they sure as hell got that part right.

You have no idea what you're talking about. It isn't about dissent, it's about lies. Every one of those groups was created because of the right wing lie machine.


I don't get how a singular and profound reaction to a particularly egregious situation can be construed or revisited as a monotonic consistent drumbeat. This huge response to what Rush has said over the last week is now being rewritten as part of some everyday humdrum left wing attempt to silence right wing voices. There are always, surely, some on side A screaming about side B. This is beyond that.

I've never, honestly, written a company complaining about who they advertise with before. I did write Netflix. I love my Netflix and will miss it. I hope they separate or at least repudiate his statements.
 
2012-03-06 08:23:13 AM  
I read this shiat and am reminded of my favorite line from 1984: "In our world, there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement."
 
2012-03-06 08:23:28 AM  

Alphax: Off topic, but is anyone else getting sick of the 'Sugar Daddy Dating' ads? For hooking up pretty young girls, and guys who look like gangsters, if not trust fund babies.


? Not sure what these are.
 
2012-03-06 08:23:51 AM  

draa: jso2897: MeinRS6: The American Left -- whether it pops up in the form of Media Matters, Color of Change, MoveOn.org, Texans for Truth or other groups -- is determined to shut off conservative dissent from their agenda by whatever means necessary.

Say whatever you want about the rest of that article, but they sure as hell got that part right.

No one can be deprived of a "right" they don't possess to begin with - and no one has a "right" to an approving audience.

The problem is Republicans confuse "conservative dissent" with "hate speech" and they're pissed off that nobody will just play along like they always have. You know the 1000's of times that it happened in the past? You can read nearly any news site and the Republican Hate is always front and center. From calling Obama shiat to calling his supprters shiat to Bush calling us shiat. Republicans have done it all. And on a personal level, too. Attacking family and friends for shiat that should be out of bounds in most cases. Just like Fluke. And when somebody does call them on it, well, "they're just picking on helpless Conservatives who don't deserve it" and "Won't somebody please think of the Conservatives?" Fark 'em I say. Fark them all and often because they deserve nothing less.


That's as may be. I just object to people claiming they are being "censored", when, in fact, they are being shunned.
 
2012-03-06 08:24:16 AM  
The Free Market at work? Cue Republican butthurt!
 
2012-03-06 08:24:17 AM  
Meanwhile, on Bizarroworld:

The university is the one whose right to religious freedom is being impinged, not the women being denied medication due to someone else's religious beliefs,
Rush Limbaugh is the victim of intimidation, not the woman he used his nationally-syndicated radio show to call a slut and a prostitute,
Responding to a personal attack and standing up for yourself is bullying,
Free speech means you are not allowed to counter-protest a protest you disagree with,
A free-market decision to stop giving someone your money is thuggish behaviour (racist and sexist to boot),
Anyone who doesn't identify as a Liberal is a Conservative,
and 75% of the population is an oppressed minority.
 
2012-03-06 08:25:09 AM  

hokiethug1992: Where do you come up with this? So many facepalms I could end up with a concussion.


He got it from Rush, it's almost exactly what he said the other day.

Nothing but lies.
 
2012-03-06 08:25:14 AM  

heinekenftw: They really are too farking stupid to actually listen to what she actually said, are they?


Rush already told them what to think of her, and that's easier.
 
Displayed 50 of 460 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report