If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The American Spectator)   The call for a "Rally for Rush" is going out whether you can conceive it or not   (spectator.org) divider line 460
    More: Obvious, Catholic University, rally, human beings, free market capitalism, recreations, fluke, Jeff Immelt, Lou Dobbs  
•       •       •

3419 clicks; posted to Politics » on 06 Mar 2012 at 5:29 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



460 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-03-06 03:30:13 AM
They're sending him to Dakar?
 
2012-03-06 03:51:25 AM
I'm glad they paginated that article. Otherwise I would have kept on reading it.

Much as one continues to watch some idiotic TV show they happened to land on while channel surfing.

/or a train wreck
 
2012-03-06 04:22:02 AM
Right on cue, the blacklisting crowd came out of their Stalinist caves. Having driven Lou Dobbs from CNN, cut off Beck's windpipe at Fox, severed Pat Buchanan from MSNBC, thus emboldened they have now set their sights on Rush.

Ha! Sure, we're all Stalinists because we're calling you on your hateful rhetoric, you farking douchebag. Have fun losing in November.
 
2012-03-06 04:31:42 AM
The American Left -- whether it pops up in the form of Media Matters, Color of Change, MoveOn.org, Texans for Truth or other groups -- is determined to shut off conservative dissent from their agenda by whatever means necessary.

Say whatever you want about the rest of that article, but they sure as hell got that part right.
 
2012-03-06 04:42:50 AM
How did he play such a long tiny violin solo without his hands cramping up?


MeinRS6: The American Left -- whether it pops up in the form of Media Matters, Color of Change, MoveOn.org, Texans for Truth or other groups -- is determined to shut off conservative dissent from their agenda by whatever means necessary.

Say whatever you want about the rest of that article, but they sure as hell got that part right.


Aw, bless your heart.
 
2012-03-06 04:46:54 AM
From TFA:

"IN THE DAYS AFTER the death of Andrew Breitbart, perhaps the question can be phrased this way: "What would Andrew do?".

My eyes rolled so far back I think I saw my brain.
 
2012-03-06 05:11:51 AM
TommyymmoT: My eyes rolled so far back I think I saw my brain.

Andrew died. I think it's a good solution.
 
2012-03-06 05:32:54 AM
You just gotta start the day off with a Rush link. Can we break the previous day's total of 7? I think we will.
 
2012-03-06 05:36:42 AM
MeinRS6: The American Left -- whether it pops up in the form of Media Matters, Color of Change, MoveOn.org, Texans for Truth or other groups -- is determined to shut off conservative dissent from their agenda by whatever means necessary.

Say whatever you want about the rest of that article, but they sure as hell got that part right.


Wait a sec. Mein R 6. Could that be a variation on "minor sex?"

Guess it makes sense that you're white knighting for Rush.
 
2012-03-06 05:37:54 AM
dudemanbro: Right on cue, the blacklisting crowd came out of their Stalinist caves. Having driven Lou Dobbs from CNN, cut off Beck's windpipe at Fox, severed Pat Buchanan from MSNBC, thus emboldened they have now set their sights on Rush.

Ha! Sure, we're all Stalinists because we're calling you on your hateful rhetoric, you farking douchebag. Have fun losing in November.


It's not like any one of those people have anything useful or meaningful to say at all... and that they didn't do it to themselves. We're so persecuted!

MeinRS6: The American Left -- whether it pops up in the form of Media Matters, Color of Change, MoveOn.org, Texans for Truth or other groups -- is determined to shut off conservative dissent from their agenda by whatever means necessary.

Say whatever you want about the rest of that article, but they sure as hell got that part right.


You know what the best method is? Make sure everyone knows what these people say and what they stand for. Give a widely available objective analysis and it plays itself out.

TommyymmoT: From TFA:

"IN THE DAYS AFTER the death of Andrew Breitbart, perhaps the question can be phrased this way: "What would Andrew do?".

My eyes rolled so far back I think I saw my brain.


They've made a Martyr out of him... just another aspect of the Right's cultist tendencies. I'm just wondering how soon after Obama's re-election will it take for the sacrifices to begin.
 
2012-03-06 05:38:42 AM
People have been attacking Rush for years.

Let me see if I can put this in a way that Liberals will understand. He is to his followers what your global warming scientists are to you. No matter WHAT you say to show that hes wrong, they are going to believe what he says and continue to support him religiously.

there. does that help?
 
2012-03-06 05:40:55 AM
dudemanbro: Ha! Sure, we're all Stalinists because we're calling you on your hateful rhetoric, you farking douchebag. Have fun losing in November.

Actually, you and people like you have been calling Rush on the fact that he's a conservative that said something you could pretend to be upset about. If hateful rhetoric of the type used by Limbaugh in this particular instance were a problem for you then you'd spend it perpetually outraged... At liberals.

But assuming you're actually interested in calling people on their hateful rhetoric, you can start with Bill Maher, and work your way up to dozens of instances each and every day of the very same liberals who are "outraged" at Limbaugh having no problem using precisely the same kind of language and worse against conservative women.

I've always wondered what would happen if conservatives ever tried treating a liberal woman the same way liberals treat conservative women, and now I know... Liberals throw a fit.
 
2012-03-06 05:41:01 AM
I sound fat: Let me see if I can put this in a way that Liberals will understand. He is to his followers what your global warming scientists are to you. No matter WHAT you say to show that hes wrong, they are going to believe what he says and continue to support him religiously.

Ah, yes. He's like a scientist, only instead of observation, data and intelligence, he utilizes oxycontin, twinkees and sex tourism.
 
2012-03-06 05:41:10 AM
TommyymmoT: From TFA:

"IN THE DAYS AFTER the death of Andrew Breitbart, perhaps the question can be phrased this way: "What would Andrew do?".


How would wanking it to a picture of O'Keefe and eating a box of doughnuts accomplish this group's goals?
 
2012-03-06 05:42:12 AM
Too late, the problem is impregnable and insurmountable.

LOL at "Stalinist"

Calling someone down for insisting that any woman who uses the pill is a slut who should be ashamed of herself has nothing to do with L v. R politics and everything to do with common sense and decency.

Two things the RW are in shockingly low supply of these days.
 
2012-03-06 05:43:29 AM
randomjsa: I've always wondered what would happen if conservatives ever tried treating a liberal woman the same way liberals treat conservative women, and now I know... Liberals throw a fit.

Can you give an example of how Bill Maher made fun of a conservative woman who wasn't a politician or a political pundit? I'll wait.
 
2012-03-06 05:43:45 AM
randomjsa: dudemanbro: Ha! Sure, we're all Stalinists because we're calling you on your hateful rhetoric, you farking douchebag. Have fun losing in November.

Actually, you and people like you have been calling Rush on the fact that he's a conservative that said something you could pretend to be upset about. If hateful rhetoric of the type used by Limbaugh in this particular instance were a problem for you then you'd spend it perpetually outraged... At liberals.

But assuming you're actually interested in calling people on their hateful rhetoric, you can start with Bill Maher, and work your way up to dozens of instances each and every day of the very same liberals who are "outraged" at Limbaugh having no problem using precisely the same kind of language and worse against conservative women.

I've always wondered what would happen if conservatives ever tried treating a liberal woman the same way liberals treat conservative women, and now I know... Liberals throw a fit.


libbynomore2/randomjsa, cross for one. Libbynomore2/randomjsa, your cross is ready.
 
2012-03-06 05:44:34 AM
Only in America.
 
2012-03-06 05:45:32 AM
head asplodes
 
2012-03-06 05:47:11 AM
I think I'll just head into the comment section and see how bad the derp is....HOLY HELL, IT'S DRAINING MY....

Brain cells go bye-bye. Me hate librul.
 
2012-03-06 05:48:37 AM
I sound fat: People have been attacking Rush for years.

Let me see if I can put this in a way that Liberals will understand. He is to his followers what your global warming scientists are to you. No matter WHAT you say to show that hes wrong, they are going to believe what he says and continue to support him religiously.

there. does that help?


Couple things.

First, Science, like atheism, is not a religion.

Second, asserting such makes you look more than a little foolish.

Does that help?
 
2012-03-06 05:50:01 AM
Gotta love how you Neo-cons double down on your moronic shiat at every opportunity. Limbaugh will continue to have idiot followers. If you need proof, just remember that a large percentage of voters in this country believe that Obama is a sekrit muslin who was born in Kenya.
 
2012-03-06 05:52:45 AM
quatchi: Too late, the problem is impregnable and insurmountable.

LOL at "Stalinist"

Calling someone down for insisting that any woman who uses the pill is a slut who should be ashamed of herself has nothing to do with L v. R politics and everything to do with common sense and decency.

Two things the RW are in shockingly low supply of these days.


Anything that isn't for hurting people is now considered evil liberal.
 
2012-03-06 05:53:04 AM
Wow some reasoned discourse going on in the comments section of that thread:

She's a Slut. She said so, in Nancy Pelosi's make believe Committee. She said: "I am getting laid, so much, that I can't afford my Pills. I am putting out my *ss, so many times a week, that Birth Control is becoming out of reach. I am bent over so many Chairs, so many Pool Tables, and so many Ottomans. I spread my legs in so many beds, so many stairwells, and on the Hoods of so many cars at the Keg Parties, every week, that I need some to GIVE ME MONEY."

Apparently, you can tell by a Slut's eyes, when she is suffering from No Pilllitis. According to Daddy's little girl, she can SEE IT on the faces of other women on Campus. The blank stares that come from a lack of Penile Penetration. (Is that true, Alan? Can that really happen?)

How Dare Limbaugh! Women who get passed around at every party UNITE! We shall come over and overcome and am I using the word "Come" too many times?

We are at WAR with an Ideology. It has No God, and No Morals. It has No Standards and No Behavioral Restrictions. It is more CULT, than it is a Political Party. It has no concept of Mercy, and it never saw a BABY, that it didn't want to KILL.

And, now, the World's best known CHRISTIAN, is coming for the CHURCH. The biggest JESUS guy, anybody's ever seen, is going Pedal to the Medal, to Tear it all down, brick by brick. The man who told George Stephanopoulos that "The Muslim Call to Prayer, is the most beautiful sound in the world" is finally shown his TRUE COLOURS.

With each passing week, he crosses another Rubicon. He will No Longer seek out the Votes of White Working Families. He pronounces that Free Market Capitalism doesn't work. He pronounces that Free Market Capitalism has NEVER Worked. The STATE will feed your kids, from Now, on. High Gas Prices will be used to FORCE his will, upon us. We WILL buy his cars, and his cars, only. We WILL buy the Condoms and the IUD's so that all of the "SLUTS and WHORES For Obama" can keep on Slutting and Whoring, just like Immelt and Buffet, do.

"And I saw the BEAST rise from the Sea. And he was given a MOUTH, to speak Haughty and Blasphemous words. And he was allowed to exercise authority for forty two months." Revelation 13-5.

Every time I write it, it becomes more obvious.
 
2012-03-06 05:53:44 AM
I sound fat: He is to his followers what your global warming scientists are to you.

So, in this analogy, Liberals prefer facts and evidence while his followers prefer bullshiat?
 
2012-03-06 05:54:25 AM
TommyymmoT: "What would Andrew do?".

Rot? he's dead jim!
 
2012-03-06 05:59:18 AM
Have these f*cktards addressed the fact that Viagra and Cialis is covered by insurance plans yet, or is it ok for America to keep subsidizing male sluts?

(This being the GOP "base" here, it's pretty much a rhetorical question)
 
2012-03-06 05:59:47 AM
Oh please oh please oh please hold an actual rally. I would love to see a photo of Rush listeners all together in one room, and I would especially love to count them.
 
2012-03-06 05:59:52 AM
Alphax: Anything that isn't for hurting people is now considered evil liberal.

Christ is rolling in his grav- er- heaven.

www.ultimatejesus.com

If you lose them to poor education when they're younger, and their parents re-enforce it, they're lost forever. We all met these kids in school.
 
2012-03-06 05:59:55 AM
elffster: TommyymmoT: "What would Andrew do?".

Rot? he's dead jim!


Who says there is no God?
 
2012-03-06 06:01:11 AM
Here you go Rush fans, you'll be needing this.

i0.kym-cdn.com

Sorry though, you'll have to shop your own caption.
 
2012-03-06 06:01:58 AM
randomjsa: dudemanbro: Ha! Sure, we're all Stalinists because we're calling you on your hateful rhetoric, you farking douchebag. Have fun losing in November.

Actually, you and people like you have been calling Rush on the fact that he's a conservative that said something you could pretend to be upset about. If hateful rhetoric of the type used by Limbaugh in this particular instance were a problem for you then you'd spend it perpetually outraged... At liberals.

But assuming you're actually interested in calling people on their hateful rhetoric, you can start with Bill Maher, and work your way up to dozens of instances each and every day of the very same liberals who are "outraged" at Limbaugh having no problem using precisely the same kind of language and worse against conservative women.

I've always wondered what would happen if conservatives ever tried treating a liberal woman the same way liberals treat conservative women, and now I know... Liberals throw a fit.


Where do you come up with this? So many facepalms I could end up with a concussion.
 
2012-03-06 06:04:14 AM
At 26 comments I thought I could beat the trolls to a Rush thread. Now I'm sad my dream will never come true.
 
2012-03-06 06:04:41 AM
Unquestioning followers, eh?

Visualize, if you will, a giant gold statue of shirtless Limbaugh surrounded by followers devoutly abiding by his teachings - yelling obscenities, disapproving of other views, and taking every sort of gluttony to excess.

Seriously though, this is false idolatry even without that. The most devoted Christians I know have never read and understood their bibles. The real problem with the born-again types is that they'll believe anything to fit in and the guy telling them about Christ for the first time has a shaky viewpoint at best.
 
2012-03-06 06:06:29 AM
Also on the BC tip Rush has been married three times and has no kids. Is he a closeted homosexual in a beard marriage or were all his wives sluts (according to his definition)?

Inquiring minds, all that.
 
2012-03-06 06:08:01 AM
quatchi: Also on the BC tip Rush has been married three times and has no kids. Is he a closeted homosexual in a beard marriage or were all his wives sluts (according to his definition)?

Inquiring minds, all that.


a 90 pound gunt covering your junk seems to be a pretty effective means of birth control.
 
2012-03-06 06:08:18 AM
amiable: Wow some reasoned discourse going on in the comments section of that thread:

Seriously, why would you do that? That was completely uncalled for. Are you trying to make us all stupid? Try to be more careful next time, I beg you.

Dracolich: Visualize, if you will, a giant gold statue of shirtless Limbaugh surrounded by followers devoutly abiding by his teachings - yelling obscenities, disapproving of other views, and taking every sort of gluttony to excess.

I think they already had CPAC this year.
 
2012-03-06 06:09:49 AM
stoli n coke: quatchi: Also on the BC tip Rush has been married three times and has no kids. Is he a closeted homosexual in a beard marriage or were all his wives sluts (according to his definition)?

Inquiring minds, all that.

a 90 pound gunt covering your junk seems to be a pretty effective means of birth control.


I always assumed he looked like Peter Griffin naked.
 
2012-03-06 06:11:34 AM
FTA: Sandra Fluke herself raced to the Ed Schultz show on MSNBC to denounce Rush. Yes, the same Ed Schulz who not long ago called conservative radio and TV commentator Laura Ingraham a "slut." And he wasn't joking either.

Oh, that wacky Rush! Calling a woman a "slut" and a "prostitute" for wanting her insurance company to pay for preventative care! What a kidder! Man, you libs need to get a sense of humor! Much like this guy has to be kidding for repeatedly attacking Ed Schulz for calling a fellow pundit a "slut" in an article entirely devoted to defending Rush for saying far worse things about a non-famous college student!

FTA: How does the far left play this blacklisting game? They exploit race and gender to try and destroy First Amendment protections. People who support a philosophy long on record as supporting every racial gambit from slavery, segregation, lynching and the Ku Klux Klan right on through to the violation of voting rights by the Black Panthers, racial quotas and illegal immigration have no scruples.

In all seriousness, though; the person who wrote that article is mentally ill. Even Glenn Beck doesn't believe liberals are pro-KKK. I can't even conceive of the level of doublethink required to believe liberals are simultaneously pro-KKK and pro-Black Panther.
 
2012-03-06 06:13:25 AM
stoli n coke: quatchi: Also on the BC tip Rush has been married three times and has no kids. Is he a closeted homosexual in a beard marriage or were all his wives sluts (according to his definition)?

Inquiring minds, all that.

a 90 pound gunt covering your junk seems to be a pretty effective means of birth control.


Your powers of description are formidable.

IOW, I just threw up a little in the back of my mouth.

Now, I need to go hunt down yesterday's lingerie thread in order to scrub that mental stain from my head so thanks a lot.

Peter Griffin naked

K, now that's not helping.
 
2012-03-06 06:13:44 AM
Rush Limbaugh has discussed at length -- at length -- what Sandra Fluke and her statist cronies are up to. Yes, he used the words "slut" and "prostitute" -- using the ludicrous to make his point. Ms. Fluke, in one of the most pathetic, shamelessly whining stories in recent memory, demands to be paid for her sex life because it costs $3,000 for three years of birth control while she's at law school.

Jesus, what's with this idiotic canard popping up everywhere? Fluke did not mention her sex life -- or anybody else's sex life, for that matter -- once in her farking testimony.

If you're going to write about one of the most "pathetic, shamelessly whining stories in recent memory," you might want to goddamned well make sure you actually listened to her testimony, because at some point I'm going to wonder why you're so farking insane you're (very loudly) remembering things that never happened. Either farking way, your credibility is slightly shot.

Or, as I asked in another thread:

WOULD IT HELP YOU STUPID F*CKING MISOGYNIST RETARDS UNDERSTAND WHAT HER TESTIMONY WAS IF THE PACKAGE READ:

ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN
FOR THE TREATMENT OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME
WARNING: SIDE EFFECTS INCLUDE INFERTILITY
 
2012-03-06 06:16:07 AM
This just in: Republicans are afraid of sex...with women.

I, for one am sick and tired of subsidizing the rape of underage Dominican boys.
 
2012-03-06 06:18:29 AM
TommyymmoT: elffster: TommyymmoT: "What would Andrew do?".

Rot? he's dead jim!

Who says there is no God?


Well...he needs to call one or two more of his faithful to Heaven: Robertson and Rush. They are needed up there.
 
2012-03-06 06:19:04 AM
elffster: TommyymmoT: elffster: TommyymmoT: "What would Andrew do?".

Rot? he's dead jim!

Who says there is no God?

Well...he needs to call one or two more of his faithful to Heaven: Robertson and Rush. They are needed up there.


And not allowed in.
 
2012-03-06 06:19:59 AM
"It turns out, as reported here, that Fluke is no struggling law student -- she's already a professional far-left genderist, long deeply into the leftist scam of judging others by skin color or gender."

A "professional far-left genderist, judging others by skin color or gender." If I wasn't laughing I'd be crying. They simply cannot deal with the fact that the only enemy here is themselves... they'll say and do anything to make one. Just like they do with Obama.
 
2012-03-06 06:20:08 AM
stoli n coke: libbynomore2/randomjsa, cross for one. Libbynomore2/randomjsa, your cross is ready.

You forgot his other alt, Link (new window).
 
2012-03-06 06:21:11 AM
Dr. Mojo PhD: ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN
FOR THE TREATMENT OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME
WARNING: SIDE EFFECTS INCLUDE INFERTILITY


I skimmed the WebMD on that. Sounds like she's achy and fat; being barefoot and pregnant would at least give her an excuse for being that way. It's pretty clear that's a better solution.

Also, raped women clearly don't have a man in their life (a man would protect her), and would give her a place for all that love she should be giving a man.

You can throw me some more hypotheticals, but it's clear you're reaching.
 
2012-03-06 06:23:21 AM
staplermofo: Dr. Mojo PhD: ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN
FOR THE TREATMENT OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME
WARNING: SIDE EFFECTS INCLUDE INFERTILITY

I skimmed the WebMD on that. Sounds like she's achy and fat; being barefoot and pregnant would at least give her an excuse for being that way. It's pretty clear that's a better solution.

Also, raped women clearly don't have a man in their life (a man would protect her), and would give her a place for all that love she should be giving a man.

You can throw me some more hypotheticals, but it's clear you're reaching.


quizzicaldog.jpg
 
2012-03-06 06:27:16 AM
I've seen this labelled as the same as what happened with Ed Schultz of MSNBC who did it on his radio show. I don't know if he did 3 days of 3 hours each and I don't know if he continued to say it after his apology.
I do know that looking at the Schultz apology vs the Limbaugh apology, that Limbaugh comes off looking bright and shiny because Schultz couldn't be bothered to take personal responsibility for his abuse of the language.
Oh, sorry. I got that completely backward. Schultz was verbose and sincere. The apology was thorough and without conditions or equivocation.
 
2012-03-06 06:30:58 AM
DrBenway: How did he play such a long tiny violin solo without his hands cramping up?

He used his penis as a bow.
 
Displayed 50 of 460 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report