If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(New York Daily News)   Infant dies of herpes after circumcision. You'll never believe how he caught it. No, really   (nydailynews.com) divider line 852
    More: Sick, Maimonides Hospital, Rockland County, inherent risk  
•       •       •

49131 clicks; posted to Main » on 04 Mar 2012 at 6:26 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



852 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-03-04 01:49:21 PM

SkunkWerks: Tatsuma: because apparently 'scholarly minds' can't spend 5 minutes to educate themselves about something

This is not a link. This is something you posted. For all I know you authored it.

Do you ever tire of smoke and mirrors?


Also this as far as I can tell mentions nothing about the medical benefits of the Rabbi or Moleh sucking the blood out of the incision site with his own unguarded mouth, even assuming it is reputable.

If you're wasting your time with me, it's your own damn fault, I'm afraid.
 
2012-03-04 01:49:24 PM

Diogenes The Cynic: Babwa Wawa: Diogenes The Cynic: Urbn: I am guessing this happened outside of a hospital or valid medical clinic, but if this shiat is covered by health insurance in any way, while birth control isn't in many cases, I'm going to go ballistic

Not covered by insurance.

Bullshido, captain. I didn't get charged a dime for my son's circumcision (performed by a doctor in the hospital).

Thats not a brit milah.


Did I say that it was?

The point is this: circumcision is covered by insurance, yet some people want to be able to avoid covering birth control and vasectomies based on religious objections.

The juxtaposition doesn't strike you as at least a bit interesting?
 
2012-03-04 01:51:01 PM

Ed Finnerty: God is really obsessed with wangs.


Yahweh: Hates bacon, loves foreskins.

Explain. Preferably without using the word "smite" or sucking off a baby with a herpes-coated tongue.
 
2012-03-04 01:51:55 PM

Diogenes The Cynic: demaL-demaL-yeH: Diogenes The Cynic: demaL-demaL-yeH:

Well, you're talking to a grade-a Persian Jew.

Orthodoxy is pretty well centered. Most communities, despite being cut off from one another for hundreds of years, and not even speaking the same languages have a huge amount of middle ground. In the vast majority of important things, there isn't much difference. Its the niggling things where the arguments exist.

And I eat kitniot, and rice on Pesach.


Yes, there is a middle ground we share.

/Can you float a fellow tribesman a decent meal or two, then?
//In my household, Pesach is the annual Adkins diet. She won't ever budge.
 
2012-03-04 01:52:52 PM

Diogenes The Cynic: Spaced Cowboy: Tatsuma: BurnShrike: So God made him do it? If he didn't have the desire to do it, then the impetus to put his mouth on a child's penis must've come from somewhere else. Where did it come from?

I am not having this discussion anymore with you. I have both explained this, and linked to a thorough explanation. You clearly do not care discussing this, just bashing.

So bash away, I'm done.

Who's the pervert, the one who makes you put a child's penis in your mouth? or the guy who actually follows through and does it?

The one who sexualizes it.

I'm thinking the pervert is definitely the diseased freak with a child's dick in his mouth and the entire crowd of people who think that is any way appropriate behavior for this century of humanity. There's really no contest here concerning which is the sick fark between disgusted internet forum goers the guy with a baby's dick in his mouth. Baby dick guy wins this one hands down.

You can try to play your usual little troll deflection game, but as usual you are 100% wrong and your comments are utterly disgusting to everyone in the room that didn't have to lift their sense of morality from a two thousand year old book of fables.

Tats said it best up ahead. Its no more perverted than giving your child a bath. Don't think like a pervert all the time.


Pretty sure baths don't involve putting your mouth on your child's genitals. Relating something (mouth-on-penis) that is commonly referred to and thought of as a sexual act to sex doesn't make you a pervert.
 
2012-03-04 01:53:29 PM

BurnShrike: Tatsuma: I'm not going to go into that 'loss of function' discussion.

How about the "maiming a child who is unable to consent" discussion?

With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil - that takes religion.


Actually, I'm pretty sure the LAW in most states defines rape as oral-genital contact. And I doubt there's any exception for religious beliefs. That'd be a huge mistake since some of these cult weirdos directly believe having sex with minors is a sacrament. Doctors of course have an exemption for handling children's genitals in the course of their duties, but there's no recognized medical procedure requiring you to suck a baby's dick.

Note that anything meeting the definition of "child rape", there is NO party to consent or excuse it. A parent/guardian cannot say "it's ok to do this with my child". Unlike some other crimes, a parent declining to press charges does NOT end a prosecution. In fact, in some states, knowing that activity meeting the definition of child rape occurred is illegal NOT to report.

I'm really kind of surprised there's not some prosecutions of this as a sex crime, it meets all the legal definitions, and there's considerable public aggro over it being a sick, sick tradition.
 
2012-03-04 01:53:39 PM

EvilEgg: Why wouldn't Catholics be Christians?


The groups that don't consider Catholics to be Christians are generally those who think the Catholic church has corrupted the worship of god to the point that it would be unrecognizable to him.

Aren't they the original ones and all the rest are splinter groups off of them.

The Roman Catholic church became a big deal after Constantine made it the official religion of Rome. There are many other sects that have a reasonable claim to being direct descendants of the loosely organized congregations of Christians.

This may be of interest to you: Wikipedia: Ante-Nicene Period.


1st century Christianity possessed a basic cohesion based on the Pauline church movement, Jewish character, and self-identification as a messianic movement. The 2nd and 3rd centuries saw a sharp divorce from its early roots. There was an explicit rejection of then-modern Judaism and Jewish culture by the end of the 2nd century, with a growing body of adversus Judaeos literature, see also Anti-Judaism. 4th and 5th century Christianity experienced imperial pressure (see State church of the Roman Empire) and developed strong episcopal and unifying structure. The ante-Nicene period was without such authority.
 
2012-03-04 01:55:43 PM
Just so I'm clear on this, the adult male takes the infant male's penis into his mouth?
 
2012-03-04 01:57:04 PM

proteus_b: Amos Quito: I'm sure that there are many people who, having been born to Jewish mothers, are technically Jews, but who have no interest in associating with the clan, don't run around talking/obsessing about it, and are therefor regarded by their fellow human beings as human beings. If these folks don't burden their children with the knowledge of their ancestry, the kids will grow up thinking of themselves as human and view other folks as human as well, and they will probably live much happier and less stressful lives as a result.

Is there something wrong with this approach?

you know, i consider myself a humanist. the only jewish ritual i indulge in is the fast on yom kipur.

yes, and while i detest the abuses committed by religious people of all religions... including the practice in the article... you seem to be overly concerned with the abuses committed by jews.

are you going to condemn the millions killed by christian crusades? the millions who suffered from the forced conversion by catholics in south and central america, africa, south asia, etc. etc.? the millions slaughtered by hindus? by buddhists? animists?

no, you reserve your condemnation for the jews. i know that it's time that someone finally stood up and condemned the jews---a group which has gotten off scot free in all their history. for this we thank you. thank you for bringing the matter to our attention.



I have condemned all of the above, as well as the millions murdered by the Nazis, the TENS of millions murdered by the Communists, and many others - but there is a difference: The atrocities of the Crusades, the Nazis, the Communists and the conquest of the Americas are largely HISTORY - past tense. The only reason to recall these is in the hopes that we can avoid such catastrophes in the future.

Zionism, OTOH, is working it's evil in the HERE AND NOW - trying at this very moment to bring much more harm and suffering to ALL of os thanks to their ethnocentric narcissism, and otherwise rational people who would normally be quick to condemn such actions have been cowed into silence thanks to asshats like you who call anyone who dares criticize their selfish behavior NAZIS.

That trick doesn't work with me, and it's working with fewer people with each passing day. The only reason that Jews are "threatened" in the Middle East is because they are THERE. And the ONLY reason that they are there is because Zionists WANTED them there. Before WWII, the vast majority of Jews wanted NOTHING to do with the Zionist scheme, because they wisely saw that it would bring them NOTHING BUT TROUBLE, and trouble is all it has brought.

So there they are, and it doesn't look like they're going anywhere, so the best obvious solution would be for them to work with and get along with their neighbors - but they clearly have NO intention of doing anything of the kind, rather, they are constantly pushing, attacking, expanding and sabotaging every effort for peace.

And they constantly want to drag everyone else in to defend the private cesspool that Zionism created.

Fark that.

You want me to stop criticizing your pals? Talk to them. Start a movement. Tell them to stop with the vicious aggressive behavior and fear mongering that lands them at the top of the headlines every day of the week.

Maybe these clowns actually don't understand that the best way to avoid having enemies is to STOP MAKING ENEMIES.

Is that concept so difficult to grasp?
 
2012-03-04 01:58:20 PM

Diogenes The Cynic: Spaced Cowboy: Tatsuma: BurnShrike: So God made him do it? If he didn't have the desire to do it, then the impetus to put his mouth on a child's penis must've come from somewhere else. Where did it come from?

I am not having this discussion anymore with you. I have both explained this, and linked to a thorough explanation. You clearly do not care discussing this, just bashing.

So bash away, I'm done.

Who's the pervert, the one who makes you put a child's penis in your mouth? or the guy who actually follows through and does it?

The one who sexualizes it.

I'm thinking the pervert is definitely the diseased freak with a child's dick in his mouth and the entire crowd of people who think that is any way appropriate behavior for this century of humanity. There's really no contest here concerning which is the sick fark between disgusted internet forum goers the guy with a baby's dick in his mouth. Baby dick guy wins this one hands down.

You can try to play your usual little troll deflection game, but as usual you are 100% wrong and your comments are utterly disgusting to everyone in the room that didn't have to lift their sense of morality from a two thousand year old book of fables.

Tats said it best up ahead. Its no more perverted than giving your child a bath. Don't think like a pervert all the time.


If your lips are on your kids dick at bath time, please send me your name and city you live in so I can call the farking police on you.
 
2012-03-04 01:59:18 PM

demaL-demaL-yeH: me: Obscure word? Because you haven't seen or heard it multiple times in, say, אלה אזכרה , which is read aloud at least once every year? Right.


Except that תלמידין absolutely does not feature in that particular piyut, and is absolutely an obscure word that is never really used, and the English version is about solely from the domain of messianic Jews and xians.

demaL-demaL-yeH: /What color are your socks, again, obnoxious Oshkenoz speed-davening yeshiva bocher boy?


you really are full of hatred for ashkenazim, aren't you? also to pretend that I'm a speed-davening guy is pretty funny.

Proved nothing yet again, except your hatred. I feel bad.
 
2012-03-04 02:00:26 PM

uttertosh: LordFlashheart: Traditions define us,

Only those of us that let them. The rest of us are freethinkers.

/by us I mean humans
//doesn't wear a kilt, play bagpipes, eat lutfisk, or fly Sveriges örlogsflagga on my boat, despite my mixed upbringing


I did play the bagpipes and served in the family's chosen regiment. I don't feel overly superior about it either. Point is we are affected by the traditions presented us by our families. This becomes incredibly apparent when one celebrates Christmas or Thanksgiving for the first time with a partner's family right down to the menu. Is it a favorable comparison to the argument at hand? No. Its an illumination for why.

I rather think my thinking is more free as a result of deviating from the path expected of me after experiencing it.
 
2012-03-04 02:01:29 PM

cpalassis: No, the Catholic church split from the Eastern Orthodox church (the church started by the Apostles after the Pentacost) in 1054. Catholics have been doing it wrong for a long time, but they're not the original Christian church.

Link (citation)


They say it was mutual, but I think we really know who was breaking up with whom.
 
2012-03-04 02:03:27 PM

demaL-demaL-yeH: Diogenes The Cynic: demaL-demaL-yeH: Diogenes The Cynic: demaL-demaL-yeH:

Well, you're talking to a grade-a Persian Jew.

Orthodoxy is pretty well centered. Most communities, despite being cut off from one another for hundreds of years, and not even speaking the same languages have a huge amount of middle ground. In the vast majority of important things, there isn't much difference. Its the niggling things where the arguments exist.

And I eat kitniot, and rice on Pesach.

Yes, there is a middle ground we share.

/Can you float a fellow tribesman a decent meal or two, then?
//In my household, Pesach is the annual Adkins diet. She won't ever budge.


There is always sushi, but just try and find kosher nori, ANYWHERE.

One thing I've done in the past is just use chol hamoed as an excuse to barbecue. I don't bother with buns for the hot dogs, and hamburgers normally, so for Pesach, I would be fine. I could live off of salads, and meat indefinitely.
 
2012-03-04 02:03:43 PM

shivashakti: Tatsuma: Maybe I shouldn't be surprised, but a lot of people in this thread are very very creepy.

Forgive them. This is something that's very foreign to them and they can't imagine a context where a grown man would put a baby's penis in his mouth and have it not be sexual.


Which is weird, because I see Catholics doing this all the time. It's worshiping the baby's masculinity, imparting blessings, whatever, but not sexualized. I don't think it's nearly as common in urban areas as in the farmtowns and countrysides though, and definitely not as common now since the pedo craze started a few decades ago. How do you think most people get oral herpes? Being kissed by family members who have open cold sores at the time. Every so often it happens for the genitals too.
 
2012-03-04 02:06:40 PM
opens site * yep just what I thought... 2004? Doesnt anyone ask for references?
 
2012-03-04 02:08:49 PM

foxyshadis: It's worshiping the baby's masculinity, imparting blessings, whatever, but not sexualized.


The "chopping off bits of the penis you're about to drink blood from" kind of makes it distinctly non-sexual, I'd say.

But then again, I don't have those kind of fetishes.

Some do... apparently.
 
2012-03-04 02:09:05 PM

Amos Quito: proteus_b: Amos Quito: I'm sure that there are many people who, having been born to Jewish mothers, are technically Jews, but who have no interest in associating with the clan, don't run around talking/obsessing about it, and are therefor regarded by their fellow human beings as human beings. If these folks don't burden their children with the knowledge of their ancestry, the kids will grow up thinking of themselves as human and view other folks as human as well, and they will probably live much happier and less stressful lives as a result.

Is there something wrong with this approach?

you know, i consider myself a humanist. the only jewish ritual i indulge in is the fast on yom kipur.

yes, and while i detest the abuses committed by religious people of all religions... including the practice in the article... you seem to be overly concerned with the abuses committed by jews.

are you going to condemn the millions killed by christian crusades? the millions who suffered from the forced conversion by catholics in south and central america, africa, south asia, etc. etc.? the millions slaughtered by hindus? by buddhists? animists?

no, you reserve your condemnation for the jews. i know that it's time that someone finally stood up and condemned the jews---a group which has gotten off scot free in all their history. for this we thank you. thank you for bringing the matter to our attention.


I have condemned all of the above, as well as the millions murdered by the Nazis, the TENS of millions murdered by the Communists, and many others - but there is a difference: The atrocities of the Crusades, the Nazis, the Communists and the conquest of the Americas are largely HISTORY - past tense. The only reason to recall these is in the hopes that we can avoid such catastrophes in the future.

Zionism, OTOH, is working it's evil in the HERE AND NOW - trying at this very moment to bring much more harm and suffering to ALL of os thanks to their ethnocentric narcissism, and otherwis ...


Every day I drive by a synagogue with a big banner that says, "WE SUPPORT ISRAEL IN HER QUEST FOR PEACE."

Years have passed and I still don't understand...
 
2012-03-04 02:10:27 PM
Diogenes the Cynic
One thing I've done in the past is just use chol hamoed as an excuse to barbecue. I don't bother with buns for the hot dogs, and hamburgers normally, so for Pesach, I would be fine. I could live off of salads, and meat indefinitely.


That's not a bad idea. I've been reading a little about the primal diet. Perhaps Passover would be a good excuse to try it out.
 
2012-03-04 02:13:30 PM

tblax: I have condemned all of the above, as well as the millions murdered by the Nazis, the TENS of millions murdered by the Communists, and many others - but there is a difference: The atrocities of the Crusades, the Nazis, the Communists and the conquest of the Americas are largely HISTORY - past tense. The only reason to recall these is in the hopes that we can avoid such catastrophes in the future.

Zionism, OTOH, is working it's evil in the HERE AND NOW - trying at this very moment to bring much more harm and suffering to ALL of os thanks to their ethnocentric narcissism, and otherwis ...

Every day I drive by a synagogue with a big banner that says, "WE SUPPORT ISRAEL IN HER QUEST FOR PEACE PIECE."

Years have passed and I still don't understand...



It was a simple spelling error. Fixed it.

Makes more sense now, no?
 
2012-03-04 02:14:59 PM

LordFlashheart: uttertosh: LordFlashheart: Traditions define us,

Only those of us that let them. The rest of us are freethinkers.

/by us I mean humans
//doesn't wear a kilt, play bagpipes, eat lutfisk, or fly Sveriges örlogsflagga on my boat, despite my mixed upbringing

I did play the bagpipes and served in the family's chosen regiment. I don't feel overly superior about it either. Point is we are affected by the traditions presented us by our families. This becomes incredibly apparent when one celebrates Christmas or Thanksgiving for the first time with a partner's family right down to the menu. Is it a favorable comparison to the argument at hand? No. Its an illumination for why.

I rather think my thinking is more free as a result of deviating from the path expected of me after experiencing it.


So, you're saying that the tradition itself doesn't define you, rather your deviance in the face of it.

I like your thinking, fellow deviant. ;-)
 
2012-03-04 02:16:27 PM
Yeah, I totally put my mouth on my kids' genitals when I give them a bath. Applying soap and rinsing it off of baby is totally the same thing as a diseased third party sucking on someone else's kid's genitals.

I believe if you posted a Craig's List ad looking for an adult to do this to your kid without mentioning religion, you and whoever responded would be thrown in jail. Can't believe that there would be a religious exception for this type of abuse.
 
2012-03-04 02:20:12 PM
His dick was bit off by a rabbi?

This has been in the news for years. Rabbis bite the dicks off of baby males. They suckle on the dick until the blood stops running, spit it out, and transmit any infections they have in the process.

Their religious freedom lets them do this. In my opinion, if the law says they can bite the dick off of a baby, then they should still be able to if they know they have an STD, as the religious test really prevails. The religious test is what's really at fault here. They really just shouldn't be able to bite dicks off of babies. I also don't think a parent should be able to mutilate their baby in general, especially having his dick bit off by a Jew with STDs. I don't have a problem with Jewish people, just Orthodox Jews. Their culture is quite horrific.

DNRTFA.
 
2012-03-04 02:21:30 PM

Urbn: Yeah, I totally put my mouth on my kids' genitals when I give them a bath. Applying soap and rinsing it off of baby is totally the same thing as a diseased third party sucking on someone else's kid's genitals.

I believe if you posted a Craig's List ad looking for an adult to do this to your kid without mentioning religion, you and whoever responded would be thrown in jail. Can't believe that there would be a religious exception for this type of abuse.


It's almost like they got "Freedom of Religion" mixed up with "Freedom to Suck Blood from a Baby's Penis in Such an Irresponsible and Unconscionable Manner as to Infect Said Baby with Herpes Simplex, Killing it as a Result".

In fact, it's pretty much exactly like that.
 
2012-03-04 02:22:58 PM
In 2004, city health officials revealed that a baby boy died after a circumcision carried out by a Rockland County rabbi who specializes in the centuries-old, ultra-Orthodox ritual known as metzizah b' peh.

Rabbi in question....
www.inpapasbasement.com
 
2012-03-04 02:24:43 PM

evilboyevil: His dick was bit off by a rabbi?

This has been in the news for years. Rabbis bite the dicks off of baby males. They suckle on the dick until the blood stops running, spit it out, and transmit any infections they have in the process.

Their religious freedom lets them do this. In my opinion, if the law says they can bite the dick off of a baby, then they should still be able to if they know they have an STD, as the religious test really prevails. The religious test is what's really at fault here. They really just shouldn't be able to bite dicks off of babies. I also don't think a parent should be able to mutilate their baby in general, especially having his dick bit off by a Jew with STDs. I don't have a problem with Jewish people, just Orthodox Jews. Their culture is quite horrific.

DNRTFA.


Not sure if trolling........
 
2012-03-04 02:26:08 PM

Diogenes The Cynic: evilboyevil: His dick was bit off by a rabbi?

This has been in the news for years. Rabbis bite the dicks off of baby males. They suckle on the dick until the blood stops running, spit it out, and transmit any infections they have in the process.

Their religious freedom lets them do this. In my opinion, if the law says they can bite the dick off of a baby, then they should still be able to if they know they have an STD, as the religious test really prevails. The religious test is what's really at fault here. They really just shouldn't be able to bite dicks off of babies. I also don't think a parent should be able to mutilate their baby in general, especially having his dick bit off by a Jew with STDs. I don't have a problem with Jewish people, just Orthodox Jews. Their culture is quite horrific.

DNRTFA.

Not sure if trolling........


he said "dnrtfa"

....not sure why unsure
 
2012-03-04 02:28:30 PM

BurnShrike:
Except that you really should be asking the person who's penis is being mutilated if they mind having bits chopped off. The child can't give their consent (nor would they be likely to unless their head were filled with religious nonsense)


Your penis is not "mutilated." Get over it. I'm sure it still works just fine. Christ, I never heard such foolishness in my life. If it were a cultural thing that I had my labia trimmed when I was a newborn, I'd think it was pretty damn dumb, but I wouldn't spend the rest of my life whining about how I'd been mutilated. My sex parts would still work as intended.
 
2012-03-04 02:30:08 PM

tblax: Diogenes The Cynic: evilboyevil: His dick was bit off by a rabbi?

This has been in the news for years. Rabbis bite the dicks off of baby males. They suckle on the dick until the blood stops running, spit it out, and transmit any infections they have in the process.

Their religious freedom lets them do this. In my opinion, if the law says they can bite the dick off of a baby, then they should still be able to if they know they have an STD, as the religious test really prevails. The religious test is what's really at fault here. They really just shouldn't be able to bite dicks off of babies. I also don't think a parent should be able to mutilate their baby in general, especially having his dick bit off by a Jew with STDs. I don't have a problem with Jewish people, just Orthodox Jews. Their culture is quite horrific.

DNRTFA.

Not sure if trolling........

he said "dnrtfa"

....not sure why unsure


He said "bit off" That's a bit off if he thinks thats what happened.
 
2012-03-04 02:32:53 PM

Diogenes The Cynic: tblax: Diogenes The Cynic: evilboyevil: His dick was bit off by a rabbi?

This has been in the news for years. Rabbis bite the dicks off of baby males. They suckle on the dick until the blood stops running, spit it out, and transmit any infections they have in the process.

Their religious freedom lets them do this. In my opinion, if the law says they can bite the dick off of a baby, then they should still be able to if they know they have an STD, as the religious test really prevails. The religious test is what's really at fault here. They really just shouldn't be able to bite dicks off of babies. I also don't think a parent should be able to mutilate their baby in general, especially having his dick bit off by a Jew with STDs. I don't have a problem with Jewish people, just Orthodox Jews. Their culture is quite horrific.

DNRTFA.

Not sure if trolling........

he said "dnrtfa"

....not sure why unsure

He said "bit off" That's a bit off if he thinks thats what happened.


He said DNRTFA

he's trolling or just ignorant. it doesn't matter
 
2012-03-04 02:34:28 PM
Tatsuma: Yeah you're just another nazi twat. Many around these days.

Tatsuma, why do you play the Nazi card so much?

I'm honestly asking this, because I want to know what it is to have a world view that predisposes you to viewing anyone other than those who enjoy the your flavor of the Jewish Legato as wearing Swastikas and just waiting for the opportunity to open up Auschwitz II: Prussian Blugaloo.

No, really, Tats. If someone disagrees with you, or - Celestia forbid - the policies of the Government of Israel, they're a closet internet nazi who is secretly cheerleading the destruction of the Jewish race. This is a reoccurring theme in your arguments.
 
2012-03-04 02:35:56 PM
Jewish Gelato. Not Legato. WTF, Google Chrome.
 
2012-03-04 02:37:18 PM
images.cheezburger.com
 
2012-03-04 02:37:31 PM

BronyMedic: Tatsuma, why do you play the Nazi card so much?


I don't play the nazi card often. In fact, very rarely, and usually only after people are quite open about it.

When someone says that there is no such thing as anti-semitism, and that the only hatred comes from what Jews are doing and saying, and that 'we farks should get off a cross' it's a pretty good sign that one is an anti-semite.

You have had many people making pretty vile comments in this thread about Jews and Judaism. Did you see me single out anyone else?

BronyMedic: No, really, Tats. If someone disagrees with you, or - Celestia forbid - the policies of the Government of Israel, they're a closet internet nazi who is secretly cheerleading the destruction of the Jewish race. This is a reoccurring theme in your arguments.


The vast majority of people in this thread disagree with me on this issue. Did I call anyone a nazi because of it? I also don't call people nazis because they object to Israel's policies. I disagree with the policies quite often mysel.

It's absolutely not a reoccurring theme in my arguments, it is however a clear proof you rarely bother to read my posts.
 
2012-03-04 02:37:59 PM
I'm Jewish and all for circumcision, but I really do not improve of a ritual that basically involved the baby getting a blow job from a dude.
 
2012-03-04 02:39:07 PM

The First Four Black Sabbath Albums: I'm Jewish and all for circumcision, but I really do not improve of a ritual that basically involved the baby getting a blow job from a dude.


As I pointed out earlier, the vast vast vast majority of brit milot are not done that way. It accounts to about 10,000 a year in Israel, and less than that in America.

Fatalities related to this seem to be once every 4-5 years worldwide, too.
 
2012-03-04 02:40:19 PM

proteus_b: BurnShrike: I must've missed all those Fark threads, or you would've seen me in there attacking those actions as well.

i was not addressing you, but rather amos quito, the "critic of zionism", who doesn't want the jews to live in israel, and doesn't want them to live anywhere else either. i take no issue with your comments.

Amos Quito: Right now your Fearless Leader Bibi is in my country lobbying his ass off to try to con the US into starting WWIII for the benefit of the Zionist State

the united states is threatening iran because it wishes to control the persian gulf.



About that:

Peres to AIPAC: Israel would triumph against Iran (new window)

"WASHINGTON -- President Shimon Peres declared Sunday that if Israel decided to take military action against Iran it would triumph.

"Peace is always our first option. But, if we are forced to fight, trust me -- we shall prevail," he said to applause from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) policy conference at which was speaking.

Charging that Iran's "ambition is to control the Middle East," he said that its nuclear program "must be stopped, and it will be stopped."
"


As opposed to:

Barack Obama tells Israel conference: 'too much loose talk of war' (new window)

"Barack Obama has admonished Israel for "too much loose talk of war" with Iran and said the world has a responsibility to give sanctions an opportunity to discourage Tehran from pursuing a nuclear weapon."

[...]

"Obama said explicitly that he is prepared to use force against Iran to defend US interests if necessary but he chastised those who appear to be in a hurry for war in comments apparently aimed at belligerent noises from Israeli officials.

"I would ask that we all remember the weightiness of these issues; the stakes involved for Israel, for America, and for the world. Already, there is too much loose talk of war," he told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac) . "Over the last few weeks, such talk has only benefited the Iranian government, by driving up the price of oil, which they depend upon to fund their nuclear programme. For the sake of Israel's security, America's security, and the peace and security of the world, now is not the time for bluster; now is the time to let our increased pressure sink in, and to sustain the broad international coalition that we have built.

"Now is the time to heed that timeless advice from Teddy Roosevelt: speak softly, but carry a big stick."
"

END QUOTES

I think it's pretty clear who is pushing for war here, and it isn't the US, and it isn't Iran.


/End replies to your threadjack
 
2012-03-04 02:40:33 PM
Damn Dirty Jews...Perverts
 
2012-03-04 02:42:36 PM

Tatsuma: The vast majority of people in this thread disagree with me on this issue. Did I call anyone a nazi because of it?


Yes.
 
2012-03-04 02:43:43 PM
definitely not a jew, errr, wait..
 
2012-03-04 02:45:45 PM

BronyMedic: Tatsuma: Yeah you're just another nazi twat. Many around these days.

Tatsuma, why do you play the Nazi card so much?

I'm honestly asking this, because I want to know what it is to have a world view that predisposes you to viewing anyone other than those who enjoy the your flavor of the Jewish Legato as wearing Swastikas and just waiting for the opportunity to open up Auschwitz II: Prussian Blugaloo.

No, really, Tats. If someone disagrees with you, or - Celestia forbid - the policies of the Government of Israel, they're a closet internet nazi who is secretly cheerleading the destruction of the Jewish race. This is a reoccurring theme in your arguments.



Why do Palestinian kids throw rocks at Israeli armor?

Because useless and irrational as it is, it's all they have.
 
2012-03-04 02:47:56 PM
And religion hates gays.

Just
Wow.
 
2012-03-04 02:51:35 PM
Baby got a BJ and died!
 
2012-03-04 02:53:15 PM

eventhelosers: i feel bad saying this but if you want some guy to suck your infants penis in order to worship a zombie well then....

if a satanic priest or whatever had performed the exact same actions in their ceremony they would probably be awaiting sexual assault/manslaughterish type charges


Jews worship a zombie?
 
2012-03-04 03:00:44 PM
I'm not reading all of that.
 
2012-03-04 03:03:18 PM
Barbaric shiat done in the name of Islam = teh evil

Barbaric shiat done in the name of Israel / Judaism = shut up, they donate a lot to the campaign
 
2012-03-04 03:08:09 PM

Amos Quito:
I have condemned all of the above, as well as the millions murdered by the Nazis, the TENS of millions murdered by the Communists, and many others - but there is a difference: The atrocities of the Crusades, the Nazis, the Communists and the conquest of the Americas are largely HISTORY - past tense. The only reason to recall these is in the hopes that we can avoid such catastrophes in the future.

Zionism, OTOH, is working it's evil in the HERE AND NOW - trying at this very moment to bring much more harm and suffering to ALL of os thanks to their ethnocentric narcissism, and otherwis ...


THIS, and a lots of it.
 
2012-03-04 03:15:59 PM

FirstNationalBastard: Circumcision is mutilation.


I see no problem with circumcision... My wife doesn't either. This kind of crap is ridiculous though.

Circumcision doesn't "mutilate" anything, it doesn't "disfigure" anything or "inflict serious damage", it makes things cleaner and a little more 'prominent', makes a rather silly looking body part look a lot less silly, but it doesn't destroy or damage anything. I don't know if I could live with myself if my willy looked like a snake wearing a sweater... :-)
 
2012-03-04 03:28:03 PM
To be blunt (get it?), the only people qualified to discuss whether circumcision inflicts serious damage are adult men who, for whatever reason, have the snip AFTER having had a sexual life.

It only "makes things cleaner" if you are a dirty person. And if it's silly, I'd like to offer your daughter a labia trim. So, so silly!

On the other hand, if you are 18 and want to hack at your junk to please an angry Semetic sky pixie, or just to please the esthetic prejudices of your wife, have at it. Body mod between consenting adults doesn't affect me in the slightest.
 
2012-03-04 03:28:57 PM

ParaHandy: Barbaric shiat done in the name of Islam = teh evil

Barbaric shiat done in the name of Israel / Judaism = shut up, they donate a lot to the campaign


You are aware that Orthodox Judaism is not the entirety of Judaism, right? No one is saying this is cool. In fact, absolutely everyone in this thread has said it's farking gross.

Doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the Jewish faith. Or any faith, for that matter.
 
Displayed 50 of 852 comments

First | « | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report