Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WRCB)   Guess who just locked up the stoner vote? Dude   (wrcbtv.com) divider line 60
    More: Spiffy, hemps, North Dakota, Paul campaign, National Convention, hard currencies, private property rights, Jamestown, Bismarck  
•       •       •

4723 clicks; posted to Politics » on 21 Feb 2012 at 9:28 AM (3 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



60 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-02-21 09:32:28 AM  
icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-02-21 09:33:27 AM  
I know it isn't Obama because his policy is an embarrassment.
 
2012-02-21 09:37:09 AM  
Oh, he's very popular Ed.
 
2012-02-21 09:38:24 AM  
Some of us might be stupid enough to use a pot reference in our handles, but why do you assume we are stupid enough to be single issues voters?
 
2012-02-21 09:45:08 AM  
Woah, like, you mean Ron Paul supports decriminalizing pot? Like wooooah, man! How did the liberal media keep this from all of us?

Well Gosh, Ron Paul, what do we have to do to get pot legalized? Complete corporate deregulation? Elimination of women's rights? What a bargain!
 
2012-02-21 09:45:26 AM  
Smoking a little herb doesn't destroy one's ability to recognize the smell of bullshiat.
 
2012-02-21 09:45:50 AM  

SixPaperJoint: Some of us might be stupid enough to use a pot reference in our handles, but why do you assume we are stupid enough to be single issues voters?


Well, a lot of Paultards I know are either Republicans that like to hide behind the "Libertarian" camouflage or college students who biatch about weed not being legal.
 
2012-02-21 09:49:19 AM  

macadamnut: Smoking a little herb doesn't destroy one's ability to recognize the smell of bullshiat.


QFT.

As much as I'd love to see it legalized, there are far more important issues at stake right now, and I would not accept Paul's brand of insanity for that relatively trivial luxury. Besides, good luck getting pot decriminalized in a political environment that shiats itself over light bulbs and binder clips.
 
2012-02-21 10:00:49 AM  
No "Spliffy" tag?
 
2012-02-21 10:02:19 AM  

stoli n coke: SixPaperJoint: Some of us might be stupid enough to use a pot reference in our handles, but why do you assume we are stupid enough to be single issues voters?

Well, a lot of Paultards I know are either Republicans that like to hide behind the "Libertarian" camouflage or college students who biatch about weed not being legal.


I did say "some". Makes one ashamed to be a stoner. We are normally such good docile people.

CSB: A good friend of mine fits both your Pualtard categories, we just talk about music.
 
2012-02-21 10:11:31 AM  
I don't know about that. I had a chat with Bong, James Bong this morning and we aren't feeling like Paultards all of the sudden.
 
2012-02-21 10:16:58 AM  
Yeah. We should just vote back in the guy that signed the bill making it legal for the government to summarily execute any one of us at any time without explanation. That's just a single issue, right?

Better yet, let's get that one other guy who wants to make it so that the only available birth control is a bayer aspirin tucked neatly between your wife's knees. His buddy has a lot of good ideas too.

Fark Politicos are a bunch of cowards.
 
2012-02-21 10:18:24 AM  
"Insanity." "Paultards." "Elimination of women's rights."

All that's missing is the "HE'S RACIST" charge to get par for the course for this thread.

/gotta keep up the emotionally charged bullshiat
 
2012-02-21 10:20:52 AM  

socodog: Yeah. We should just vote back in the guy that signed the bill making it legal for the government to summarily execute any one of us at any time without explanation. That's just a single issue, right?

Better yet, let's get that one other guy who wants to make it so that the only available birth control is a bayer aspirin tucked neatly between your wife's knees. His buddy has a lot of good ideas too.

Fark Politicos are a bunch of cowards cowardly, leftist partisans.


FTFY

/if the election were held on Fark, Obama would win with probably 85% of the vote
 
2012-02-21 10:23:04 AM  
Funny, last I checked, no stoner I know is smoking HEMP. While I think hemp is a fine product with many many uses from textiles to foodstuffs and is sustainable and cost effective, legalizing hemp is a far cry from legalizing cannabis.

As for the retards supporting RON PAUL! on legalization, they are just that, retards. We need a comprehensive Federal policy that treats all states fairly. RON PAUL! advocates a States Rights stance, which would lead to extremely variable laws in different states. Draconian states will remain draconian while the less retarded states will enact more sensible, less retarded legislation.

Most stoners can't see the bigger picture. We need a comprehensive national policy, not some piecemeal legal-in-one-state-but-illegal-in-others policy as is the case with gay marriage. We need something that is fair for all, not a patchwork of varied and confusing legislation that would run afoul of the Interstate commerce clause if you take a bag of weed on vacation in a non-legal state.
 
2012-02-21 10:24:26 AM  
Martha Washington, man, she was a cool chick.
 
2012-02-21 10:26:01 AM  

Hydra: /if the election were held on Fark, Obama would win with probably 85% of the vote


In other words, about what is going to happen in November anyway. Good call!
 
2012-02-21 10:26:35 AM  
The stoner block doesn't vote.

All the big "Ron Paul gonna legalize weed and save the world" folks I know have complete unrealistic expectations about what a president can do. Same goes for the "Both sides are bad, we need a parliamentary system" twenty somethings who abstain from voting because they think it sends some kind of "message." If they can't elect someone who will magically change the country into exactly what they want overnight, they won't vote.
 
2012-02-21 10:31:29 AM  

CorporatePerson: The stoner block doesn't vote.

All the big "Ron Paul gonna legalize weed and save the world" folks I know have complete unrealistic expectations about what a president can do. Same goes for the "Both sides are bad, we need a parliamentary system" twenty somethings who abstain from voting because they think it sends some kind of "message." If they can't elect someone who will magically change the country into exactly what they want overnight, they won't vote.


Sometimes I just wish Comedy Central would re-run that 'Dances With Smurfs' episode of SP until the tiny-brained figure out what the theme of the episode is.

/Yes, I realize we don't have that kind of time.
 
2012-02-21 10:32:06 AM  
Ron Paul's rise to stardom reminds me a lot of Timothy Leary's

two old men talking so much bullshiat that the young gullible rubes can only think he is some kind of wise old guru

when in fact he is just a guy that has been spouting crack pot economic quackery for way to long.
 
2012-02-21 10:33:40 AM  

StoneColdAtheist: In other words, about what is going to happen in November anyway. Good call!


You say that like it's a good thing for the country.
 
2012-02-21 10:35:25 AM  
Free and unregulated markets work so well all you have to do is look at the Mortgage industry and the subprime fiasco that pumped billions of toxic loans that were nothing more than financial time-bombs into the worlds economy

RP is the looney tunes
 
2012-02-21 10:46:31 AM  

CorporatePerson: The stoner block doesn't vote.

All the big "Ron Paul gonna legalize weed and save the world" folks I know have complete unrealistic expectations about what a president can do. Same goes for the "Both sides are bad, we need a parliamentary system" twenty somethings who abstain from voting because they think it sends some kind of "message." If they can't elect someone who will magically change the country into exactly what they want overnight, they won't vote.


Some twenty somethings won't vote because they refuse to register for the draft. I consider it gender discrimination and voter suppression. i believe it tilts our electorate to a more pro-war stance than we would otherwise have. I think that no one should ever be required to register for the draft in order to vote.
 
2012-02-21 10:50:25 AM  

Hydra: StoneColdAtheist: In other words, about what is going to happen in November anyway. Good call!

You say that like it's a good thing for the country.


Not fitting the motif of "social conservative", I'd confess your supposition is correct.

More to the point, even some GOP sympathizers are conceding that the President will win 35 or more States in the fall, and in so doing crush their candidate.
 
2012-02-21 10:50:45 AM  

Falcc: Woah, like, you mean Ron Paul supports decriminalizing pot? Like wooooah, man! How did the liberal media keep this from all of us?

Well Gosh, Ron Paul, what do we have to do to get pot legalized? Complete corporate deregulation? Elimination of women's rights? What a bargain!


Though if you add his stance on pot to his non-interventionist policy, you do come up with a really good reason to vote in the Republican primary. Personally, unless something extreme happened - say the invasion of Iran coupled with the resurrection of the draft, I would still vote for Obama in the general election. However, I wouldn't mind Obama sweating the election a little and understanding that he is vulnerable due to the Peace voters.

Yeah, I know it's a fantasy ....
 
2012-02-21 11:00:11 AM  
Gee, could it be RON PAUL?

/dnrtfa
 
2012-02-21 11:02:49 AM  

eepopoarkahah: No "Spliffy" tag?


I gotcha covered:

i249.photobucket.com
 
2012-02-21 11:07:03 AM  
The only way pot is going to become legal is if the states start to pass laws making it so. No one in the federal government is going to spend the political capital necessary to have a real fight over what they consider to be a minor issue. The fact that lives are being ruined by this prohibition really doesn't matter much to them.
 
2012-02-21 11:09:17 AM  

macadamnut: Smoking a little herb doesn't destroy one's ability to recognize the smell of bullshiat.


I would say in many cases it can enhance it.

I light buzz helps some people see other points of view. Then, in the sober light of morning you can weigh the various views having at least some appreciation for each view.
 
2012-02-21 11:16:44 AM  

StoneColdAtheist: Not fitting the motif of "social conservative", I'd confess your supposition is correct.

More to the point, even some GOP sympathizers are conceding that the President will win 35 or more States in the fall, and in so doing crush their candidate.


I'm not saying he won't - we have enough people in this country who don't understand the severe economic collapse that awaits us if we continue what we're doing: i.e. financing $1 trillion+ deficits with money printing.

This undermines the reserve currency status of the dollar. The moment we lose world reserve currency status - which we're well on our way - we lose the ability to print money at the pace we have been without plainly obvious repercussions. One of the primary reasons other countries and central banks still demand dollars is because oil and other commodities are sold in dollars. We went into Iraq partly because Saddam threatened to sell Iraqi oil in Euros; Iran is already doing just that in selling Iranian oil for gold and other currencies for a few years now. This further undermines the dollar's status and allows other countries to begin setting up for a move away from the dollar. The "experts" say that we're still a decade or so away from any meaningful transition, but those same "experts" were also saying that the Greece was solvent in 2010 and that the world economy was peachy keen in 2007 - how wrong they turned out to be.

Obama can't divorce himself from listening to those "experts" - especially the ones who keep telling him to keep doing what he's been doing (Krugman, Krueger, et. al.) - and is simply playing politics because he wants to be re-elected. He isn't destroying the economy for nefarious reasons - "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" - he just doesn't realize what he's doing is wrong, and it might not come to fruition until after his re-election. It's inevitable at this point, though, and as long as he'll be able to find a scapegoat ("bankers! wall street! the 1%ers!"), he'll be able to manipulate the ignorant masses into following right along with the progressive agenda he wants to push.

So just because a bunch of people might agree with Obama doesn't mean he's right in what he's doing. Like other nations before us, ours was bound to fall sooner or later - it's just a shame it had to be sooner, and it's a shame we'll lose the freedom we used to enjoy in the process.
 
2012-02-21 11:20:59 AM  

pope183: Free and unregulated markets are evil and the source of all the world's misfortunes


Having established that concepts such as open markets, free enterprise, and limited government are dangerous and unworkable, I propose that we nationalize all private companies and banks, placing them under the control of a National Commission for Economic Prosperity. This Commission will be composed of highly intelligent individuals with access to perfect information regarding all aspects of economic activity. Considering the elegantly scathing criticism of capitalism you just delivered, which belies your deep and intuitive understanding of economics, I hereby nominate you to Chair this newly formed Commission.
 
2012-02-21 11:23:09 AM  
Decriminalization of pot?

img689.imageshack.us

Ron Paul as President?

i.imgur.com
 
2012-02-21 11:27:12 AM  

Hydra: StoneColdAtheist: Not fitting the motif of "social conservative", I'd confess your supposition is correct.

More to the point, even some GOP sympathizers are conceding that the President will win 35 or more States in the fall, and in so doing crush their candidate.

I'm not saying he won't - we have enough people in this country who don't understand the severe economic collapse that awaits us if we continue what we're doing: i.e. financing $1 trillion+ deficits with money printing.

This undermines the reserve currency status of the dollar. The moment we lose world reserve currency status - which we're well on our way - we lose the ability to print money at the pace we have been without plainly obvious repercussions. One of the primary reasons other countries and central banks still demand dollars is because oil and other commodities are sold in dollars. We went into Iraq partly because Saddam threatened to sell Iraqi oil in Euros; Iran is already doing just that in selling Iranian oil for gold and other currencies for a few years now. This further undermines the dollar's status and allows other countries to begin setting up for a move away from the dollar. The "experts" say that we're still a decade or so away from any meaningful transition, but those same "experts" were also saying that the Greece was solvent in 2010 and that the world economy was peachy keen in 2007 - how wrong they turned out to be.

Obama can't divorce himself from listening to those "experts" - especially the ones who keep telling him to keep doing what he's been doing (Krugman, Krueger, et. al.) - and is simply playing politics because he wants to be re-elected. He isn't destroying the economy for nefarious reasons - "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" - he just doesn't realize what he's doing is wrong I don't agree with him, and it might not come to fruition until after his re-election. It's inevitable at this point, though, and as long as he'll be able to find a scapegoat ( ...


ftfy
 
2012-02-21 11:31:37 AM  

Koalacaust: Having established that concepts such as open markets, free enterprise, and limited government are dangerous and unworkable, I propose that we nationalize all private companies and banks, placing them under the control of a National Commission for Economic Prosperity. This Commission will be composed of highly intelligent individuals with access to perfect information regarding all aspects of economic activity. Considering the elegantly scathing criticism of capitalism you just delivered, which belies your deep and intuitive understanding of economics, I hereby nominate you to Chair this newly formed Commission.


8/10. Bravo.

/it's a shame how many Farkers actually believe what you just said
 
2012-02-21 11:37:23 AM  

Hydra: socodog: Yeah. We should just vote back in the guy that signed the bill making it legal for the government to summarily execute any one of us at any time without explanation. That's just a single issue, right?

Better yet, let's get that one other guy who wants to make it so that the only available birth control is a bayer aspirin tucked neatly between your wife's knees. His buddy has a lot of good ideas too.

Fark Politicos are a bunch of cowards cowardly, leftist partisans.

FTFY

/if the election were held on Fark, Obama would win with probably 85% of the vote


you are being a little too generous aren't you? more like 90~95%, especially during normal working hours / Starbucks barista breaks
 
2012-02-21 11:38:40 AM  
Hemp is not marijuana (as stated above). Hemp could do a lot for small businesses to compete against large chemical companies who make synthetics, such as DuPont, that do the same thing. But the chemical companies surely do not want that, and that is the reason for the season.

Everyone with any intelligence is aware of the above. Unlike any of the "given choices", Ron Paul has no reason to favor DuPont over the public. Hemp could be a major crop in America once again, replacing a lot of the oil products (synthetics, oils) from big corporations.

It almost feels like the same level of "Gosh, I wish the Stupid would stop" about hemp, as I get about Religion.
 
2012-02-21 11:38:40 AM  
Every Ron Paul supporter I know (which is admittedly not a large group) is in it for the legalization of pot, and when you bring up any of Paul's more whack-a-do views, they say that the president wouldn't have the power to do that 'because congress.'

...but apparently 'because congress' ain't gonna stop him on the pot issue.
 
2012-02-21 11:41:39 AM  

pope183: when in fact he is just a guy that has been spouting crack pot economic quackery for way to long.


You can get a Nobel prize for crack pot economic quackery? Huh. Didn't know that.
 
2012-02-21 11:43:29 AM  

Lunaville: Some twenty somethings won't vote because they refuse to register for the draft. I consider it gender discrimination and voter suppression. i believe it tilts our electorate to a more pro-war stance than we would otherwise have. I think that no one should ever be required to register for the draft in order to vote.


I kind of think it's because you can't text in your vote American Idol style or because most younger people don't care/aren't informed of what's going on. They won't see the results immediately so they are less inclined to make the decision to get off their fat, lazy, pop music listening, illegitimate children having asses off the couch that their parents paid for (or they got from the rent to own store where they're behind on a few months payments) and vote.

I'm only 30, and I remember registering for the draft was something as easy as mailing in a post card they send you. I had no problem with this because I know they will never reinstate the draft, ever. Plus I think a person has to do it if you're applying for federal loans for college.

When it comes to politicians, I'm a firm believer that none of them really care about you or I. They're just there to grease their own palms while pushing which ever agenda they've become the paid spokesperson for. And then there's religion. Nutcases. Imagine just how easier the world would be if people threw aside their belief in fables and fairytales.
 
F42
2012-02-21 11:47:17 AM  

Stoker: Hemp is not marijuana (as stated above). Hemp could do a lot for small businesses to compete against large chemical companies


And that is why marihuana was made illegal. So large chemical companies wouldn't have to compete with hemp.

Isn't corruption fun?
 
2012-02-21 11:49:07 AM  

WhiskeySticks: fat, lazy, pop music listening, illegitimate children having

I'm only 30


I don't disagree with the sentiment, but your grumbles up there sound like they fit someone twice your age. "Pop music listening"? You're only about 15 years out...
 
2012-02-21 11:50:47 AM  

LabGrrl: Every Ron Paul supporter I know (which is admittedly not a large group) is in it for the legalization of pot, and when you bring up any of Paul's more whack-a-do views, they say that the president wouldn't have the power to do that 'because congress.'

...but apparently 'because congress' ain't gonna stop him on the pot issue.


As the head of the executive branch, the president can order the DEA/FBI/AG,Etc to stop enforcing prohibition. He can also reschedule drugs. All of this can be done without congress's support.
 
2012-02-21 11:54:15 AM  

ShawnDoc: LabGrrl: Every Ron Paul supporter I know (which is admittedly not a large group) is in it for the legalization of pot, and when you bring up any of Paul's more whack-a-do views, they say that the president wouldn't have the power to do that 'because congress.'

...but apparently 'because congress' ain't gonna stop him on the pot issue.

As the head of the executive branch, the president can order the DEA/FBI/AG,Etc to stop enforcing prohibition. He can also reschedule drugs. All of this can be done without congress's support.


...and do you believe that none of his other views can be promoted the same way?
 
2012-02-21 12:01:05 PM  

Electromax: WhiskeySticks: fat, lazy, pop music listening, illegitimate children having

I'm only 30


I don't disagree with the sentiment, but your grumbles up there sound like they fit someone twice your age. "Pop music listening"? You're only about 15 years out...


I worked in an independent record store for about 8 years after managing the music and movies department of a Target store for 2 years...I've got a chip on my shoulder when it comes to people consuming musical garbage. Makes me sick, like Strawberry Quik.
 
2012-02-21 12:24:18 PM  

deschinc: Hydra: StoneColdAtheist: Not fitting the motif of "social conservative", I'd confess your supposition is correct. More to the point, even some GOP sympathizers are conceding that the President will win 35 or more States in the fall, and in so doing crush their candidate.

I'm not saying he won't - we have enough people in this country who don't understand the severe economic collapse that awaits us if we continue what we're doing: i.e. financing $1 trillion+ deficits with money printing.


Fair enough, but by the same token I wasn't endorsing President Obama's specific policies, either. I wouldn't vote for a "social conservative" no matter their economic policies, and frankly all of the GOP candidates scare the bejeebus out of me, so I plan to vote for Obama.

This undermines the reserve currency status of the dollar. The moment we lose world reserve currency status - which we're well on our way - we lose the ability to print money at the pace we have been without plainly obvious repercussions. One of the primary reasons other countries and central banks still demand dollars is because oil and other commodities are sold in dollars. We went into Iraq partly because Saddam threatened to sell Iraqi oil in Euros; Iran is already doing just that in selling Iranian oil for gold and other currencies for a few years now. This further undermines the dollar's status and allows other countries to begin setting up for a move away from the dollar. The "experts" say that we're still a decade or so away from any meaningful transition, but those same "experts" were also saying that the Greece was solvent in 2010 and that the world economy was peachy keen in 2007 - how wrong they turned out to be.

Obama can't divorce himself from listening to those "experts" - especially the ones who keep telling him to keep doing what he's been doing (Krugman, Krueger, et. al.) - and is simply playing politics because he wants to be re-elected. He isn't destroying the economy for nefarious reasons - "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" - he just doesn't realize what he's doing is wrong I don't agree with him, and it might not come to fruition until after his re-election. It's inevitable at this point, though, and as long as he'll ...


Again, fair enough...I hear your criticisms. That said, I would just point out that his policies are a straight-line extrapolation of the previous GOP administration's: spend like a drunken sailor in the hope we avoid utter collapse. We aren't out of the woods, yet (see Greece), but had he thrown out the anchor on spending we would have seen that worst case scenario come to pass (see 1929-1933).

So who are you going to vote for, and why?
 
2012-02-21 12:37:30 PM  

Koalacaust: pope183: Free and unregulated markets are evil and the source of all the world's misfortunes

Having established that concepts such as open markets, free enterprise, and limited government are dangerous and unworkable, I propose that we nationalize all private companies and banks, placing them under the control of a National Commission for Economic Prosperity. This Commission will be composed of highly intelligent individuals with access to perfect information regarding all aspects of economic activity. Considering the elegantly scathing criticism of capitalism you just delivered, which belies your deep and intuitive understanding of economics, I hereby nominate you to Chair this newly formed Commission.


you and everyone else knows that is not what i said.

you reminded me of a 12 year old drama queen -

don't pee in your pants Nancy...
 
2012-02-21 01:10:12 PM  

pope183: Koalacaust: pope183: Free and unregulated markets are evil and the source of all the world's misfortunes

Having established that concepts such as open markets, free enterprise, and limited government are dangerous and unworkable, I propose that we nationalize all private companies and banks, placing them under the control of a National Commission for Economic Prosperity. This Commission will be composed of highly intelligent individuals with access to perfect information regarding all aspects of economic activity. Considering the elegantly scathing criticism of capitalism you just delivered, which belies your deep and intuitive understanding of economics, I hereby nominate you to Chair this newly formed Commission.

you and everyone else knows that is not what i said.

you reminded me of a 12 year old drama queen -

don't pee in your pants Nancy...


Apologies if I hurt your feelings, but hearing people rant against market economies as if they were the sole contributing factor to the economic collapse brings out the troll in me. A less derptastic response to your earlier post might have been:

"While a lack of regulatory oversight in certain areas of the financial sector helped precipitate the economic collapse, the events of the last five years are emphatically not an indictment of capitalism, free enterprise, or limited government."
 
2012-02-21 01:34:56 PM  

StoneColdAtheist: Again, fair enough...I hear your criticisms. That said, I would just point out that his policies are a straight-line extrapolation of the previous GOP administration's: spend like a drunken sailor in the hope we avoid utter collapse.


No argument here. Like FDR took Roosevelt's bad policies and made them worse, so too will Obama take GWB's bad policies and make them worse. Obama promised "change" while, in effect, giving us more of the same - just like FDR did with Roosevelt. About the only difference is scale (FDR's interventions were larger in scope than Roosevelt's; Obama's are larger than GWB's).


We aren't out of the woods, yet (see Greece), but had he thrown out the anchor on spending we would have seen that worst case scenario come to pass (see 1929-1933).

Thinking that FDR and Roosevelt's policies were completely different is a common misconception; Hoover was more interventionist than any previous administration before him.


So who are you going to vote for, and why?

I'm caught between Ron Paul and Gary Johnson. Though I don't agree with their policies 100%, they're the two candidates I've seen who recognize the true condition of our economy and the currency crisis that's staring us in the face. While their proposals aren't economic panaceas, they do the most out of anyone's proposals to move toward a solution at least to stave off what awaits us.

It's sad that it's considered "too extreme" to balance the budget (which mathematically CANNOT be balanced by raising taxes on the wealthiest 1% alone). Cutting things like the Departments of Energy and Education (neither of which existed before the Carter administration) get them called "ludicrous" and "insane" - which are nothing but emotionally charged arguments meant to tug at people's heatstrings. "YOU MUST HATE EDUCATION/ENERGY/[insert pet special interest here]!! INSANITY!!" They are even pariahs in their own party for wanting to make substantial cuts to the defense budget; they must hate defense, I suppose.

These kinds of difficult cuts must be made - yes, even to SS and the Medis - if we are to prevent what's coming. Every single penny the government spends has someone in some special group benefitting from it - be it federal employees, defense contractors, large corporations with heavy government subsidies/protections. ANY cuts made ANYWHERE will upset SOMEONE. We have to recognize this and understand that simply throwing more emtional crap around - "HE HATES GRANDMA/POOR PEOPLE!!" - gets us nowhere and does nothing to advance the debate. We could grant to the states or privatize much of what the government does and notice very little effect on the service rendered - this is the debate that we must advance to if we want to start making real changes, and this is where Paul and Johnson want it to go.

And they get called "crazy" for saying it.


Otherwise, if we do nothing, once markets move on from the problems in the Eurozone, they'll move to us and start giving us MAJOR trouble. When that happens and a full-on run on the dollar begins (and it will), it'll make the 2008 financial crisis look like a cakewalk. Who gets hurt the most when this happens? Obama's two favorite voting blocs: the middle class and poor people.
 
2012-02-21 01:57:02 PM  
Industrial hemp would be nice, but I'm not nuts about some of the guy's other positions.
 
2012-02-21 01:57:19 PM  
Just wait till the the women stoners learn that he's pro-life.
 
Displayed 50 of 60 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report