Brent Bozell was on Hannity last night whining about this. Farking hilarious.

Freeper Friday come on down.

Boonowa tweepi mah bukee, keel-ee caleya ku kah

Translation: All rich guys are equal, but some are more equal than others.

It's so radical to fund groups that try to help get people registered to vote. Guy is a regular Adolf.

Picking a winner???

What about the aliens? And the RAND Corporation?

So, the point of TFA is that we're supposed to be mad that "media" which we all used to think was honorable and noble, is actually controlled by a few rich guys who hate each other and use their respective news outlets to pitch hissy fits and make all the rest of us hate the other guy more?

I hate the world. Can we just rain down the bombs, or develop the zombie virus or whatever it is that's supposed to start the Mayan Apocalypse? I don't want to have to wait until December.

So, is this graph being updated or are they just recycling old poutrages?

So?

and this surprises who?

THEIR PROPAGANDA OUTLETS ARE EVIL!

OUR PROPAGANDA OUTLETS ARE FAIR AND BALANCED!

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!

/goldsteeeeeee--i mean sorooooooooos!

My only issue, and I could give a rats ass about media matters, is the weekly meetings with the white house for strategy planning. Not that I care what the talk about, but you can't be a 501.3C organization and delve that heavily into politics. That's just the rule.

Regardless of how it is funded, they do nothing but play cliips in their entireity, with context, and shed light on howe slanted Faux News is.

Somehow, Fox has a big problem with this.

"Anti-FOX activists." Oh, dear. . . .

unyon: So what? I mean really, so what? "Rich guy funds organization that supports a range of his political pet projects." This is now considered news? Please.

When it is a non-profit and gets indirect or direct taxpayers dollars? Sure. How would you feel about a non-profit whose sole mission was to take down NPR?

I especially like the anti-gun message and taking $400,000 in anti-gun money when the head of Media Matters has an armed bodyguard at all times.

Bottom line is, you would freak if this was done to your side, but make excuses when it is against the right, or the perceived evil Fox News. I can't believe even Farkers think taxpayer money should be used to fund political agendas. If Bush did it, you would be soiling yourselves with Anger. Democrats do it and it is awesome? Come on. Grow up. You guys think people should be forced to join a union, and forced to provide union dues to support Democratic politicians, regardless if you want to or not. That is as un-American as it gets.

jayphat: My only issue, and I could give a rats ass about media matters, is the weekly meetings with the white house for strategy planning. Not that I care what the talk about, but you can't be a 501.3C organization and delve that heavily into politics. That's just the rule.

[CITATION NEEDED]

I am completely shocked that a left-wing media group would be involved in the exact conspiratorial collusion that they always accuse the right-wing of, for which there is no evidence.

Completely shocked.

I'm a little behind on things, but what the hell is a reverse vampire. Is it a vampire that bleeds on you? Why not just call it a blood donor?

Thunderpipes: I especially like the anti-gun message and taking $400,000 in anti-gun money when the head of Media Matters has an armed bodyguard at all times.

So he needs guards to keep him safe from crazies with guns, so would like to see less crazies with guns. What a hypocrite.

JerseyTim: You also really gotta admire the wording in there. I like the way he refers to Media Matters as "embattled." Also, the use of "KleinOnline has learned" is cute. Yeah, great work, you looked up Wikipedia and some public financial disclosure forms. You're a regular Woodward and Bernstein.

There's plenty of word bombs in there....

"Tides is one of the biggest financial backers of progressive and radical left groups in the U.S."

"For example Tides is a primary funder to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now or ACORN, and is closely tied to the group implicated in voter fraud"

"the socialist-leaning Democracy Now!; the Marxist-founded Free Press; the Marxist-oriented Institute for Policy Studies;"

Thunderpipes: unyon: So what? I mean really, so what? "Rich guy funds organization that supports a range of his political pet projects." This is now considered news? Please.

When it is a non-profit and gets indirect or direct taxpayers dollars? Sure. How would you feel about a non-profit whose sole mission was to take down NPR?

I especially like the anti-gun message and taking $400,000 in anti-gun money when the head of Media Matters has an armed bodyguard at all times.

Bottom line is, you would freak if this was done to your side, but make excuses when it is against the right, or the perceived evil Fox News. I can't believe even Farkers think taxpayer money should be used to fund political agendas. If Bush did it, you would be soiling yourselves with Anger. Democrats do it and it is awesome? Come on. Grow up. You guys think people should be forced to join a union, and forced to provide union dues to support Democratic politicians, regardless if you want to or not. That is as un-American as it gets.

No, I don't. I don't think that at all. Sorry if I don't fit your caricature of a lib'rul. I do think FOX News is the journalistic equivalent of AIDS, though. So I'm probably still stupid or evil or something. . . .

Reverse vampires? So instead of sucking, they blow?

Jake Havechek: jayphat: My only issue, and I could give a rats ass about media matters, is the weekly meetings with the white house for strategy planning. Not that I care what the talk about, but you can't be a 501.3C organization and delve that heavily into politics. That's just the rule.

[CITATION NEEDED]

Google is pretty simple to use.

https://www.google.com/search?q=media+matters+white+house+meetings&ie = utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

unyon: So what? I mean really, so what? "Rich guy funds organization that supports a range of his political pet projects." This is now considered news? Please.

only when they are "anti-fox news" activist. otherwise they are patriots.

RevLovejoy: Regardless of how it is funded, they do nothing but play cliips in their entireity, with context, and shed light on howe slanted Faux News is.

Somehow, Fox has a big problem with this.

How dare you show people what we said!

taxachucetts: I'm a little behind on things, but what the hell is a reverse vampire. Is it a vampire that bleeds on you? Why not just call it a blood donor?
[www.buddytv.com image 222x229]

What is it with airline food?

markfara: Thunderpipes: unyon: So what? I mean really, so what? "Rich guy funds organization that supports a range of his political pet projects." This is now considered news? Please.

When it is a non-profit and gets indirect or direct taxpayers dollars? Sure. How would you feel about a non-profit whose sole mission was to take down NPR?

I especially like the anti-gun message and taking $400,000 in anti-gun money when the head of Media Matters has an armed bodyguard at all times.

Bottom line is, you would freak if this was done to your side, but make excuses when it is against the right, or the perceived evil Fox News. I can't believe even Farkers think taxpayer money should be used to fund political agendas. If Bush did it, you would be soiling yourselves with Anger. Democrats do it and it is awesome? Come on. Grow up. You guys think people should be forced to join a union, and forced to provide union dues to support Democratic politicians, regardless if you want to or not. That is as un-American as it gets.

No, I don't. I don't think that at all. Sorry if I don't fit your caricature of a lib'rul. I do think FOX News is the journalistic equivalent of AIDS, though. So I'm probably still stupid or evil or something. . . .

You are stupid in this case. There have been plenty of studies about bias in the media. Fox is very close to center, a hair right. Most outlets are quite a bit out in left field. You are so used to the left wing media telling you how America is evil, capitalism is the Devil, and Bush eats babies that you think the truth is right wing. Well, good. Fox makes mistakes, of course it does. So do other media outlets.

Remember, Obama himself tried to get Fox kicked out of the press covering him. It took other media outlets to tell him no way buddy. We get it, Fox does not campaign for Obama and the Democrats. You hate them. Oh well.

taxachucetts: I'm a little behind on things, but what the hell is a reverse vampire. Is it a vampire that bleeds on you? Why not just call it a blood donor?
[www.buddytv.com image 222x229]

It's a vampire that can walk around during the day. It's from Aqua Teen Hunger Force.

Thunderpipes When it is a non-profit and gets indirect or direct taxpayers dollars? Sure. How would you feel about a non-profit whose sole mission was to take down NPR?

I especially like the anti-gun message and taking $400,000 in anti-gun money when the head of Media Matters has an armed bodyguard at all times.

Bottom line is, you would freak if this was done to your side, but make excuses when it is against the right, or the perceived evil Fox News. I can't believe even Farkers think taxpayer money should be used to fund political agendas. If Bush did it, you would be soiling yourselves with Anger. Democrats do it and it is awesome? Come on. Grow up. You guys think people should be forced to join a union, and forced to provide union dues to support Democratic politicians, regardless if you want to or not. That is as un-American as it gets.

You forgot about the forced abortions of white babbies

Fox is very close to center, a hair right.

Can I have a hit of what you're smoking?

AlwaysRightBoy: And this is news? This is common knowledge at Glenn Beck U.


//why yes, my doctorate is hanging on my classroom wall

does it come with a helmet, a napkin for drool, safety utensils, and an I'm With Stupid t-shirt?