It's Not News It's Fark.com
Real news. Real funny
Log In
|
Sign Up »
Login
Password
Forgot password?
X
Fark
TotalFark
my
Fark
About/FArQ
Contests
Store
Contact Us
Mobile
Search:
Password
Login
Turn on javascript (or enable it for Fark) for a better user experience.
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Main
Sports
Business
Geek
Entertainment
Politics
Video
Retirement may require less income than you think, so you can spend more time thinking about how you're going to decorate your refrigerator box
(
forbes.com
)
38
More:
Cool
,
retirement
,
refrigerators
• • •
2600
clicks; posted to
Business »
on
15 Feb 2012
at
12:20 AM
|
Favorite
| share:
more»
|
shirt it!
Share this link:
URL:
http://fk.cm/go/6942195
Bookmark:
URL:
http://fk.cm/6942195
Bookmark:
Article
Comments
close
38 Comments
(
+0 »
)
Paginated (50/page)
Single page
Single page, reversed
Normal view
Change images to links
Show raw HTML
Show posts from ignored users
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
NewportBarGuy
2012-02-14 07:57:46 PM
If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
revrendjim
2012-02-14 09:15:25 PM
NewportBarGuy
:
If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
Tell me about it. I'm 53. I should have retired ten years ago. Now I'll be giving $5 BJs at the bus station.
Hector Remarkable
2012-02-14 10:35:08 PM
Oh,
you
have a refrigerator box. Luxury.
Backwards Cornfield Races
2012-02-15 12:22:26 AM
So we can cut down on social security tax? Would be nice to keep some more of my own money
jaytkay
2012-02-15 12:26:27 AM
revrendjim
:
Tell me about it. I'm 53. I should have retired ten years ago. Now I'll be giving $5 BJs at the bus station.
We used to DREAM of having a bus station!
wejash
2012-02-15 12:34:36 AM
jaytkay
:
revrendjim: Tell me about it. I'm 53. I should have retired ten years ago. Now I'll be giving $5 BJs at the bus station.
We used to DREAM of having a bus station!
I'm bidding on a spot behind the dumpsters at the Shell gas station. I ain't sayin' where or y'all bid up the rights.
/Bought and held 2 REITs through the crash. Oh yes I did. Smart, I is.
MyRandomName
2012-02-15 01:46:18 AM
NewportBarGuy
:
If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
LOLWUT. No it hasn't.
Bazinga In My Pants
2012-02-15 01:50:00 AM
revrendjim
:
NewportBarGuy: If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
Tell me about it. I'm 53. I should have retired ten years ago. Now I'll be giving $5 BJs at the bus station.
Put me down for two.
/Not proud.
MyRandomName
2012-02-15 01:52:02 AM
NewportBarGuy
:
If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
Just to make you feel like an even bigger retard.
DOW in 2002 was roughly 8000. It is now 12000. If you have made no money, you are farking more retarded than your original post. This is especially true considering that most in 401ks put in monthly, so they bought low, and have gained from lows, bought high, and still have gained. Basically you are one of the dumbest people on fark.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^DJI&a=09&b=1&c=2002&d=01&e=15&f=2012 & g=d&z=66&y=2310
// yes, I'll enjoy my ban.
TomD9938
2012-02-15 02:12:00 AM
Backwards Cornfield Races
:
So we can cut down on social security tax? Would be nice to keep some more of my own money
And pass up on the untold riches?
Assimilate This
2012-02-15 02:41:17 AM
Conceptually it's not that hard. Stay in good health through proper diet and exercise; pay off your house; stay out of debt; and make wise investments over the long term. Done.
Notabunny
2012-02-15 02:43:10 AM
revrendjim
:
NewportBarGuy: If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
Tell me about it. I'm 53. I should have retired ten years ago. Now I'll be giving $5 BJs at the bus station.
Ha! Got you beat, sucker!
James F. Campbell
2012-02-15 02:49:47 AM
Assimilate This
:
Conceptually it's not that hard. Stay in good health through proper diet and exercise; pay off your house; stay out of debt; and make wise investments over the long term. Done.
Oh, is that all?
Pick
2012-02-15 06:46:03 AM
Don't worry, they will fix Social Security. I just know they will.
Nuclear Monk
2012-02-15 07:25:50 AM
revrendjim
:
NewportBarGuy: If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
Tell me about it. I'm 53. I should have retired ten years ago. Now I'll be giving $5 BJs at the bus station.
Will you hum the Subway song while you're doing it?
NewportBarGuy
2012-02-15 07:29:49 AM
MyRandomName
:
DOW in 2002 was roughly 8000. It is now 12000. If you have made no money, you are farking more retarded than your original post. This is especially true considering that most in 401ks put in monthly, so they bought low, and have gained from lows, bought high, and still have gained. Basically you are one of the dumbest people on fark.
Give me the 10 year avg return on the DJIA, then factor in inflation. Come back once you have the real percentage gain of investing in the DJIA over ten years. I didn't say it was zero, I said it has been a rough decade for buy and hold. For fun do the real gain for S&P and Russell 2000.
t3knomanser
2012-02-15 07:57:07 AM
NewportBarGuy
:
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
My mutual funds have been doing
fantastic
. I've got an S&P500 index, which is all over the place, but I've got a dividend-focused strategic income and some international funds, which is where most of my money sits. Is it making as much as the theoretical stock market investing
could
? Probably not. But it's making solid money.
In any case, it seems to me that people taking out home equity loans are the ones pillaging their retirement. The single largest element of my retirement plan is getting the mortgage paid off by my early 40s. Once that's done, my cost of living drops precipitously. Oh, and kids. Kids are actually probably the worst thing to have if you plan to retire.
chi_tino
2012-02-15 08:39:48 AM
NewportBarGuy
:
MyRandomName: DOW in 2002 was roughly 8000. It is now 12000. If you have made no money, you are farking more retarded than your original post. This is especially true considering that most in 401ks put in monthly, so they bought low, and have gained from lows, bought high, and still have gained. Basically you are one of the dumbest people on fark.
Give me the 10 year avg return on the DJIA, then factor in inflation. Come back once you have the real percentage gain of investing in the DJIA over ten years. I didn't say it was zero, I said it has been a rough decade for buy and hold. For fun do the real gain for S&P and Russell 2000.
I just did:
SPY (a good way to invest in the S&P 500) on Feb 1, 2002: 111
SPY right now: 135
But if you hold the SPY, you also get dividends. Over $20 worth in those 10 years. Assuming reinvestment, you are looking at almost a 50% return over a decade.
My expenses did not go up by 50% over the past decade. Actually, I moved from a large northern city to Florida, so my expenses dropped by about a third.
Now, if someone had been prudently diversified with a few bonds during that period, the total return would be about twice as high, as bonds have much more than doubled during that period.
/retired early due to investment returns
//reading Fark by the pool right now
phedex
2012-02-15 08:49:03 AM
Can't fret about retirement. Just focus on putting money into your 401, 403, wherever you can and hope for the best. It took me until recently (i'm 30) that I have been able to put 10% of money income into my retirement, although I've always contributed something.
Granted i'm fortunate in that i've had a stable job for 10 years, don't have a wife and don't have kids. Theres no way I'd be able to save that much if I had that kind of financial responsibility.
the poster above hit it spot on though. Get a home, commit to living in it and pay it off. if you have a house that is paid for and you're in your 40's, you're going to be in a good spot come retirement if you start putting even more into your retirement. Its going to be hard, because theres always a temptation to get a different, bigger place or whatever. But having your living situation paid for is what will enable you to take it to the next level over the last 10-15-20 years of your working life.
Really the best thing any person can do is save within their means. Sometimes life gets in the way, but if you obsess or think about it to much you'll be miserable.
Kibbler
2012-02-15 08:57:30 AM
Forbes, the organ of the five-vacation-homes-in-the-US-and-three-overseas set, tells us not to worry about retirement income.
Got it.
Fizpez
2012-02-15 09:22:02 AM
chi_tino
:
NewportBarGuy: MyRandomName: DOW in 2002 was roughly 8000. It is now 12000. If you have made no money, you are farking more retarded than your original post. This is especially true considering that most in 401ks put in monthly, so they bought low, and have gained from lows, bought high, and still have gained. Basically you are one of the dumbest people on fark.
Give me the 10 year avg return on the DJIA, then factor in inflation. Come back once you have the real percentage gain of investing in the DJIA over ten years. I didn't say it was zero, I said it has been a rough decade for buy and hold. For fun do the real gain for S&P and Russell 2000.
I just did:
SPY (a good way to invest in the S&P 500) on Feb 1, 2002: 111
SPY right now: 135
But if you hold the SPY, you also get dividends. Over $20 worth in those 10 years. Assuming reinvestment, you are looking at almost a 50% return over a decade.
My expenses did not go up by 50% over the past decade. Actually, I moved from a large northern city to Florida, so my expenses dropped by about a third.
Now, if someone had been prudently diversified with a few bonds during that period, the total return would be about twice as high, as bonds have much more than doubled during that period.
/retired early due to investment returns
//reading Fark by the pool right now
I'm not piling on, and 50% is certainly better than nothing but a "good rule of thumb" was that a decent invesment will double every 7-8 years - (11% historical average on the Dow) - by that measure the ROR should triple what it has been over the last decade. In short, it's sucked.
mcreadyblue
2012-02-15 09:40:30 AM
Fizpez
:
chi_tino: NewportBarGuy: MyRandomName: DOW in 2002 was roughly 8000. It is now 12000. If you have made no money, you are farking more retarded than your original post. This is especially true considering that most in 401ks put in monthly, so they bought low, and have gained from lows, bought high, and still have gained. Basically you are one of the dumbest people on fark.
Give me the 10 year avg return on the DJIA, then factor in inflation. Come back once you have the real percentage gain of investing in the DJIA over ten years. I didn't say it was zero, I said it has been a rough decade for buy and hold. For fun do the real gain for S&P and Russell 2000.
I just did:
SPY (a good way to invest in the S&P 500) on Feb 1, 2002: 111
SPY right now: 135
But if you hold the SPY, you also get dividends. Over $20 worth in those 10 years. Assuming reinvestment, you are looking at almost a 50% return over a decade.
My expenses did not go up by 50% over the past decade. Actually, I moved from a large northern city to Florida, so my expenses dropped by about a third.
Now, if someone had been prudently diversified with a few bonds during that period, the total return would be about twice as high, as bonds have much more than doubled during that period.
/retired early due to investment returns
//reading Fark by the pool right now
I'm not piling on, and 50% is certainly better than nothing but a "good rule of thumb" was that a decent invesment will double every 7-8 years - (11% historical average on the Dow) - by that measure the ROR should triple what it has been over the last decade. In short, it's sucked.
Don't forget those pesky Capital gains taxes.
chi_tino
2012-02-15 09:53:03 AM
mcreadyblue
:
Fizpez: I said it has been a rough decade for buy and hold.
Don't forget those pesky Capital gains taxes.
Capital gains taxes for "buy and hold" are zero until you sell it (presumably when you are retired and pay little to no taxes). If it is in a Roth IRA or equivalent, it will never be taxed after you buy it.
AcneVulgaris
2012-02-15 10:21:06 AM
MyRandomName
:
NewportBarGuy: If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
Just to make you feel like an even bigger retard.
DOW in 2002 was roughly 8000. It is now 12000. If you have made no money, you are farking more retarded than your original post. This is especially true considering that most in 401ks put in monthly, so they bought low, and have gained from lows, bought high, and still have gained. Basically you are one of the dumbest people on fark.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^DJI&a=09&b=1&c=2002&d=01&e=15&f=2012 & g=d&z=66&y=2310
// yes, I'll enjoy my ban.
Many of us came of investment age in 2000.
fark you, you smugass boomer.
natazha
2012-02-15 10:53:22 AM
Retired in 2004. Income dropped from $120K to about $8,000/year. Of that $120K, I was living on less than$50K/year, half of that was the mortgage. Sold my house in California, paid cash for my place in Oregon, cash for my van, and cash for the remodel. Still have more in the investment accounts that the day I retired.
jst3p
2012-02-15 11:41:41 AM
AcneVulgaris
:
MyRandomName: NewportBarGuy: If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
Just to make you feel like an even bigger retard.
DOW in 2002 was roughly 8000. It is now 12000. If you have made no money, you are farking more retarded than your original post. This is especially true considering that most in 401ks put in monthly, so they bought low, and have gained from lows, bought high, and still have gained. Basically you are one of the dumbest people on fark.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^DJI&a=09&b=1&c=2002&d=01&e=15&f=2012 & g=d&z=66&y=2310
// yes, I'll enjoy my ban.
Many of us came of investment age in 2000.
fark you, you smugass boomer.
Then you still have lots of time, so long as you don't take an arrow in the knee.
cig-mkr
2012-02-15 01:15:44 PM
Fortunately I invested in the "dogs of the Dow" and have fairly well. All dividends were plowed back into stocks over the years, when the stocks were low I kept with them and figured my dividends would only buy more shares.
Was in it for the long term, didn't panic.
Today's mentality of buy in the morning and sell in the afternoon is just legalized gambling in my book.
SpectroBoy
2012-02-15 01:47:31 PM
revrendjim
:
Tell me about it. I'm 53. I should have retired ten years ago. Now I'll be giving $5 BJs at the bus station.
Damn, I will need to go to $4 to stay competitive.
SpectroBoy
2012-02-15 01:48:35 PM
Backwards Cornfield Races
:
So we can cut down on social security tax? Would be nice to keep some more of my own money
Good point. If there is one thing we have learned from the current recession it is that a safety net is not important and we will all be find fending for our selves.
*eyeroll*
godofatheist
2012-02-15 02:05:59 PM
James F. Campbell
:
Assimilate This: Conceptually it's not that hard. Stay in good health through proper diet and exercise; pay off your house; stay out of debt; and make wise investments over the long term. Done.
Oh, is that all?
yup. disabled, live correctly within my means. and am able to contribute to my savings and my nest egg every month. work smarter, not harder.
/thanks scrooge mc duck.
lasercannon
2012-02-15 02:29:19 PM
revrendjim
:
NewportBarGuy: If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
Tell me about it. I'm 53. I should have retired ten years ago. Now I'll be giving $5 BJs at the bus station.
Two questions. In which city and state is this bus stop? Question two is there an ATM on location or should I stop by a bank before hand?
Hector Remarkable
2012-02-15 03:22:48 PM
Pick
:
Don't worry, they will fix Social Security. I just know they will.
My Daddy's got some costumes in the barn!
Ambivalence
2012-02-15 06:33:06 PM
Backwards Cornfield Races
:
So we can cut down on social security tax? Would be nice to keep some more of my own money
You'll just spend it on booze.
(seriously, this is the GOP excuse to not give money to the poor, but REGULAR Americans are so much more freaking responsible? Id on't think so).
Ambivalence
2012-02-15 06:35:51 PM
Bazinga In My Pants
:
revrendjim: NewportBarGuy: If you believe in compound interest in equity investments, you'll wind up with a million dollars. Provided you start with 100 million dollars.
/Thanks, Jon Stewart.
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
Tell me about it. I'm 53. I should have retired ten years ago. Now I'll be giving $5 BJs at the bus station.
[www.letshavefunwithenglish.com image 640x270]
Put me down for two.
/Not proud.
Why does that bill have the word "specimen" on it? Eww! What did you do to it?
Contents Under Pressure
2012-02-16 01:52:10 AM
The reason you don't need as much when you're old is that you already bought all the basic stuff. Kitchenware, bedding, furniture, a house, lots of clothes. After a time, it's just a matter of replacing things that are broken. Plus, after doing some things hundreds of times, like...oh..sport shopping... are not as interesting as before.
wombatsrus
2012-02-16 03:47:44 AM
NewportBarGuy
:
I
//Been a rough decade for buy and hold unless you are an amazing stock picker.
Not a rough decade for buy and hold if you remembered 2 things:
1) Diversify - if you want to retire you should never have all your money in stocks but spread out among different stock types, bonds, commodities, and real estate (which can all be done via mutual funds and ETFa). You don't do as good as the market when it has a good year, but you don't do as bad during bad years - and this works to your advantage especially during volatile times.
2) Dollar cost average - buying and holding but never continuing to invest is not as good as buying and holding with consistent investments over time.
With diversification and dollar cost averaging over the last 10 years, one would have done quite well. Maybe not a return that hit it out of the park, but a nice set of singles that have provided a nice gain.
Hardy-r-r
2012-02-16 06:05:47 AM
Backwards Cornfield Races
:
So we can cut down on social security tax? Would be nice to keep some more of my own money
bubbadave1056
2012-02-16 09:46:09 PM
A guy named "stupido?" What the hell does he know?
Displayed
38
of
38
comments
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
Redisplay/refresh comments
This thread is closed to new comments.
Submit a Link »
Like Fark!
+1 Fark!
Follow @fark on Twitter
Business via RSS
Top Links
Top Comments
Top Submitters
Press/Publicity
Headlines of the Week
All Latest
Fark Forum
Link Voting
Sports Forum
Fark Blogs
Geek Forum
Fark Book
Entertainment Forum
Fark Travel Guide
Politics Forum
Fark Parties
Fark Party Forum
Fark Chat
Photoshop Forum
PS/Photo Browser
Farktography Forum
Fark Quiz
From the
Fark Shop
:
Ultraf***CARRIER LOST***
Star Trek Galileo - Mighty Wallet
Alphabet Ice Cube Tray
Tyrannosaurus Rex 3D Anatomy Model
More from the
Fark Shop
»
Stories from our partner sites:
5 Movie Roles Will Smith (Probably) N...
Katy Perry Seems Surprisingly Cool Ab...
The GIFs That Keep on Giving
This Baby Elephant is Almost Too Cute...
More news at Scribol »
Bungie Confirms Its Official Absence...
Halo 4 Blurry Beta Footage Reveals Ne...
Microsoft Job Listing Points To In-Ga...
Battlefield Rumors Point To £35 Premi...
More news at G4TV »
Five Tools You'll Need to Survive, We...
Snakeskin pedicures and gold facials
Gorgeous Goth Girls
Never Pay For Laundry Again! (PICS)
More news at Village Voice »
Hiya Hot Stuff
Start Spreadin' The Repos
Licked At The Seaside
Sad Supermodels
More news at truTV »