If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Duplicate of another approved link: 6932153


(Huffington Post) Sad Huffington Post has ruined ramen noodles   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 8
More: Sad  
•       •       •

775 clicks; Favorite

8 Comments   (+0 »)
   
 
2012-02-12 05:29:15 AM
You never go M2A.
 
2012-02-12 08:44:12 AM
Warchild: You never go M2A.

Yes you do! How else will you lube it up? NEVER GO IN DRY!!!
 
2012-02-12 08:47:04 AM
GAH! The bias and improper behavior from these "scientists" are more sickening than A2M.
 
2012-02-12 09:19:53 AM
No, someone else ruined ramen noodles.

Huffington Post just posted the video on their website so they could get money.
 
2012-02-12 09:26:03 AM
Get garbage science spotlighted on Huffington post, earn fark repeat.
 
2012-02-12 09:32:47 AM
ohnonothisnoodlesinmyshiatagain.jpg
 
2012-02-12 10:11:52 AM
This isn't science, this is propaganda, poorly done.

Their bias is painfully obvious, as is their ignorance of real science. Just because a food contains an ingredient with a big, scary-sounding chemical name, doesn't necessarily mean it is bad for you. So the noodles retain their shape - so what? Lots of those, scary chemical names actually come from nature you twit.

People need to learn science. Good science, and good, critical thinking skills. Said skills activate the bullshiat detectors in ones head, which are useful in analyzing this kind of material, which is exactly the same material which emerges at the end of the video, presumably.
 
2012-02-12 10:28:13 AM
MoistenedBint: This isn't science, this is propaganda, poorly done.

Their bias is painfully obvious, as is their ignorance of real science. Just because a food contains an ingredient with a big, scary-sounding chemical name, doesn't necessarily mean it is bad for you. So the noodles retain their shape - so what? Lots of those, scary chemical names actually come from nature you twit.

People need to learn science. Good science, and good, critical thinking skills. Said skills activate the bullshiat detectors in ones head, which are useful in analyzing this kind of material, which is exactly the same material which emerges at the end of the video, presumably.


While I agree the "experiment" doesn't give due process to the scientific method nor is it a particularly objective analysis, the premise that heavily machine-processed food isn't as healthy for you as simpler products that have existed for millenia before the invention of machine industry is sound. I don't think it should come as a surprise that your gut isn't generally capable of breaking down substances derived from petrochemicals, or other substances that don't naturally occur in plant or animal matter. Whether or not that also means the intestines can and will still absorb those materials, or simply pass through to be excreted, I'm ignorant about.
 
Displayed 8 of 8 comments

 
   Forgot password? Create an account to make comments
  Remember me
If you can see this, something's wrong with your browser's CSS support.
  (see myFark preferences)
 
Before posting, please take a minute to review our posting rules and our legal/privacy policy.
By posting, you agree to these terms.
Got questions about Fark? See our FAQ.
Notify moderators about this thread
(comment-related issues: posting rule violations, etc.)
...or Notify admins about this link
(link/headline related issues: bad link, bad headline, repeats, etc.)
If you are about to post a question that requires an answer from us, use Farkback instead.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »