If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The New York Times) Obvious Conservatives: "The reason poor people are falling behind is because liberals have corrupted their values -- not anything we've done." Krugman: "Now wait a damn minute here. . "   (nytimes.com) divider line 185
More: Obvious, office supply, social cohesion, economic inequality, developed country, liberals  
•       •       •

9881 clicks; posted to Main » on 10 Feb 2012 at 9:40 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



185 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-02-10 09:42:34 AM
cache.ohinternet.com
 
2012-02-10 09:43:14 AM
Duh, everyone knows poor people are poor because they deserve to be and all rich people are exemplifications of Horatio Alger.
 
2012-02-10 09:43:15 AM
Arguing with conservatives is like playing chess with a pigeon. You can know everything about the game, have years of practice, and yet, that won't stop the pigeon from knocking over the pieces, taking a crap on the board, and strutting around like a dumb-fark.
 
2012-02-10 09:43:17 AM
More divine right of kings stuff. The powerful/rich deserve what they have, and the weak/poor deserve what they have.
 
2012-02-10 09:45:03 AM
Why is it that whenever there is a problem, people often seem convinced that there is a single, overwhelming causative factor?

/Not necessarily aimed at this, just in general
 
2012-02-10 09:45:04 AM
Tyrone Slothrop: More divine right of kings stuff. The powerful/rich deserve what they have, and the weak/poor deserve what they have.

Who are you to question God's will?
 
2012-02-10 09:45:34 AM
Tyrone Slothrop: More divine right of kings stuff. The powerful/rich deserve what they have, and the weak/poor deserve what they have.

Which makes it LOL IRONY that Santorum says Obama's taking us down a path toward the French Revolution.
 
2012-02-10 09:45:46 AM
Ooh! Can I do it this time?

FLAME ON!
 
2012-02-10 09:45:50 AM
So now we're back to "the poor are poor because they are immoral, stupid, and lazy".
 
2012-02-10 09:45:50 AM
You're still listening to that moron Krugman?

We now know for sure and certain that under the most aggressive spending plans possible that no more than 250 billion dollars could have been spent from the 'stimulus'. The stated goals of the stimulus were grossly unrealistic and 'shovel ready' turned out to just be a buzzword they came up with. The whole thing was one big PR campaign to make it seem like Obama was doing something when the whole thing just turned in to a slush fund for campaign supporters.

Let me state again: It is a now a known fact that under the most aggressive spending plans possible, no more than 250 billion dollars could have been spent. Far less than the total amount of the stimulus

The wizard that is Krugman said that the stimulus didn't work as well as it should have because it wasn't large enough. So is he lying or is he stupid?
 
2012-02-10 09:46:28 AM
The best part is the "conservatives" saying this are often lower middle class folk one paycheck away from Government assistance and bankruptcy.
 
2012-02-10 09:46:30 AM
the_sidewinder: Why is it that whenever there is a problem, people often seem convinced that there is a single, overwhelming causative factor?

Well, I don't think it's just that people think there's a single causative factor.
 
2012-02-10 09:46:32 AM
Tyrone Slothrop: More divine right of kings stuff. The powerful/rich deserve what they have, and the weak/poor deserve what they have.

Yup, we're moving backwards.

It's amazing how propaganda has convinced the idiotic that they will be all be kings some day.
 
2012-02-10 09:47:11 AM
News flash: Republicans are full of shiat. Also, water is wet and the sun is hot.
 
2012-02-10 09:47:12 AM
Republican "responsibility" is "flexible".
 
2012-02-10 09:47:28 AM
the_sidewinder: Why is it that whenever there is a problem, people often seem convinced that there is a single, overwhelming causative factor?

I think it's because we want to think that things can be fixed. If something has a single cause, you can address it and it's no longer a problem.
 
2012-02-10 09:47:52 AM
randomjsa: You're still listening to that moron Krugman?

We now know for sure and certain that under the most aggressive spending plans possible that no more than 250 billion dollars could have been spent from the 'stimulus'. The stated goals of the stimulus were grossly unrealistic and 'shovel ready' turned out to just be a buzzword they came up with. The whole thing was one big PR campaign to make it seem like Obama was doing something when the whole thing just turned in to a slush fund for campaign supporters.

Let me state again: It is a now a known fact that under the most aggressive spending plans possible, no more than 250 billion dollars could have been spent. Far less than the total amount of the stimulus

The wizard that is Krugman said that the stimulus didn't work as well as it should have because it wasn't large enough. So is he lying or is he stupid?


2/10
 
2012-02-10 09:48:57 AM
Reality has a well-known liberal bias.
 
2012-02-10 09:49:13 AM
randomjsa: You're still listening to that moron Krugman?

Don't you know that he's got a Nobel Prize, and there's tons of strawmen to burn?!?!

/Argument from authority is still a logical fallacy, bobblehead hipster kids
 
2012-02-10 09:49:49 AM
randomjsa: You're still listening to that moron Krugman?

We now know for sure and certain that under the most aggressive spending plans possible that no more than 250 billion dollars could have been spent from the 'stimulus'. The stated goals of the stimulus were grossly unrealistic and 'shovel ready' turned out to just be a buzzword they came up with. The whole thing was one big PR campaign to make it seem like Obama was doing something when the whole thing just turned in to a slush fund for campaign supporters.

Let me state again: It is a now a known fact that under the most aggressive spending plans possible, no more than 250 billion dollars could have been spent. Far less than the total amount of the stimulus

The wizard that is Krugman said that the stimulus didn't work as well as it should have because it wasn't large enough. So is he lying or is he stupid?


citationneeded.lol
 
2012-02-10 09:49:51 AM
randomjsa: It is a now a knownwidely believed fact that under the most aggressive spending plans possible, no more than 250 billion dollars could have been spent.
 
2012-02-10 09:50:15 AM
Mykeru: randomjsa: You're still listening to that moron Krugman?

We now know for sure and certain that under the most aggressive spending plans possible that no more than 250 billion dollars could have been spent from the 'stimulus'. The stated goals of the stimulus were grossly unrealistic and 'shovel ready' turned out to just be a buzzword they came up with. The whole thing was one big PR campaign to make it seem like Obama was doing something when the whole thing just turned in to a slush fund for campaign supporters.

Let me state again: It is a now a known fact that under the most aggressive spending plans possible, no more than 250 billion dollars could have been spent. Far less than the total amount of the stimulus

The wizard that is Krugman said that the stimulus didn't work as well as it should have because it wasn't large enough. So is he lying or is he stupid?

2/10


You are being charitable.
 
2012-02-10 09:50:26 AM
Mykeru: Arguing with conservatives is like playing chess with a pigeon. You can know everything about the game, have years of practice, and yet, that won't stop the pigeon from knocking over the pieces, taking a crap on the board, and strutting around like a dumb-fark.

I nominate this for FARK Post of the WeekTM.
 
2012-02-10 09:50:28 AM
"You can make it if you work hard and believe in yourself!"

I'm stunned by the number of friends I have who have already forgotten that they got what success they have through connections rather than "hard work" (some of them I've known to be real slobs)
 
2012-02-10 09:50:30 AM
randomjsa:
Let me state again: It is a now a known fact that under the most aggressive spending plans possible, no more than 250 billion dollars could have been spent. Far less than the total amount of the stimulus


Knownst to whom I might ask?
 
2012-02-10 09:50:49 AM
the_sidewinder: Why is it that whenever there is a problem, people often seem convinced that there is a single, overwhelming causative factor?

And that that single overwhelming causative factor is Teh Libs?
 
2012-02-10 09:51:18 AM
Can't spank because it might hurt a kids self esteem.

Can't encourage monogamy because kids are going to fark anyway.

Can't suggest waiting until marriage to have sex because that's just archaic.

So we end up with teen mothers with no education, no money, and no prospects. We end up with kids with single parent homes and young, stressed out, uneducated mothers, who go on to perpetuate the cycle and join OCCUPY! campouts because they can't figure out who farked them up so we MIGHT AS WELL BLAME PEOPLE WHO SUCCEEDED.

But nah, blame people who try to slow down the USS Progressive from crashing into the rocks.
 
2012-02-10 09:51:40 AM
I don't want to imply that the conservatives are right on this issue, and I know it's only evidence-by-example, but the Great Depression wouldn't have been half so bad if not for all the poor people.
 
2012-02-10 09:52:12 AM
QuesoDelicioso: water is wet and the sun is hot.

I see what you did there. You are just trying to inject your liberal "global warming" theory into the discussion. For your information, scientists don't know nothing and the majority of honking big polluting companies don't think "climate change" is a problem that has to be addressed this quarter because they are too busy "growing the economy". In China.

So there, commie douche-bag.
 
2012-02-10 09:52:38 AM
I'll believe it when Fred changes the signs to Poor.

i743.photobucket.com
 
2012-02-10 09:52:43 AM
I've said it before and I'll say it again: the Republican party is the party of the selfish. They want to hold onto what they have, and they are not concerned about people who don't have it.

They disguise this in faux concern for the poor: "We want them to have the ability to help themselves and build themselves up without handouts." That's the whole "haves and the soon-to-haves" BS from the GOP response to the SOTU address. Which, as most people know, isn't a very realistic proposition.
 
2012-02-10 09:52:54 AM
GORDON: Can't spank because it might hurt a kids self esteem.

Can't encourage monogamy because kids are going to fark anyway.

Can't suggest waiting until marriage to have sex because that's just archaic.

So we end up with teen mothers with no education, no money, and no prospects. We end up with kids with single parent homes and young, stressed out, uneducated mothers, who go on to perpetuate the cycle and join OCCUPY! campouts because they can't figure out who farked them up so we MIGHT AS WELL BLAME PEOPLE WHO SUCCEEDED.

But nah, blame people who try to slow down the USS Progressive from crashing into the rocks.


....what?

1/10.
 
2012-02-10 09:53:12 AM
GORDON: Can't spank because it might hurt a kids self esteem.

Can't encourage monogamy because kids are going to fark anyway.

Can't suggest waiting until marriage to have sex because that's just archaic.

So we end up with teen mothers with no education, no money, and no prospects. We end up with kids with single parent homes and young, stressed out, uneducated mothers, who go on to perpetuate the cycle and join OCCUPY! campouts because they can't figure out who farked them up so we MIGHT AS WELL BLAME PEOPLE WHO SUCCEEDED.

But nah, blame people who try to slow down the USS Progressive from crashing into the rocks.


Ah, so it's teen mothers' fault that the poor are poor.
 
2012-02-10 09:53:14 AM
derbtastic: Ooh! Can I do it this time?

FLAME ON!


i1199.photobucket.com
 
2012-02-10 09:54:03 AM
I like getting both sides of a story; I'd heard the author that Krugman is critiquing on NPR and now this rebuttal.

Working-class America is having a bad time of it, on a general downward trend over time. AND it appears that there's a strong correlation with that and declining participation in the traditional family construct. Solution: be more traditional.

BUT: The reason that traditional participation in society is declining at the lower end is because the traditional jobs, wages, and benefits have contracted mightily, while those eligible for middle-class and white-collar employment have gained significant education and skills margins.

Solution: on-shoring by industry, while families must re-commit to pushing their kids to take school seriously. Wow, it almost sounds like this isn't a simple problem at all! Wait, that's because it isn't.

Point: Krugman.
 
2012-02-10 09:54:07 AM
Good article. But it's not a new line of thought to say that people have little because of their moral failings. Puritans have been saying that since they landed here. They were wrong then and they're wrong now.
Still, it's good to point out that it's being said again. With Romney talking about "saving America's soul" and Santorum, well, running, there's going to be a whole lot of blaming the plight of the poor on their moral failings. It kinda needs to stop.
 
2012-02-10 09:54:30 AM
GORDON: Can't spank because it might hurt a kids self esteem.

Can't encourage monogamy because kids are going to fark anyway.

Can't suggest waiting until marriage to have sex because that's just archaic.

So we end up with teen mothers with no education, no money, and no prospects. We end up with kids with single parent homes and young, stressed out, uneducated mothers, who go on to perpetuate the cycle and join OCCUPY! campouts because they can't figure out who farked them up so we MIGHT AS WELL BLAME PEOPLE WHO SUCCEEDED.



There is a hole in your cause-and-effect logic big enough to drive a semi through.
 
2012-02-10 09:55:31 AM
The president that brought more people out of poverty and off of the welfare rolls was Bill Clinton, and conservatives hated him for it.
 
2012-02-10 09:55:41 AM
/puts on tinfoil hat

Doesn´t it seem that the conservatives want to introduce a feudal like or a Victorian like society in the States ?
and in extension the rest of the western world ?

no middle class only upper class and low paid, no rights, worker class, plebs.

/takes off tinfoil hat
just saying
 
2012-02-10 09:56:29 AM
Mykeru: Arguing with conservatives is like playing chess with a pigeon. You can know everything about the game, have years of practice, and yet, that won't stop the pigeon from knocking over the pieces, taking a crap on the board, and strutting around like a dumb-fark.

Tip o' the hat to you, sir.

That's the funniest sh*t I've read on Fark in a good long while.

Welcome to the list.
 
2012-02-10 09:56:33 AM
Matthew 5:5 - blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Santorum.
 
2012-02-10 09:57:00 AM
"Paging Mr. John Calvin. John Calvin, you have an emergency call on the white courtesy phone. No, the white phone!"
 
2012-02-10 09:57:23 AM
On the one hand, my generation is an embarrassment. The Occupiers aren't helping by a damn sight either. The norm used to be look for a job, if you don't find one, look harder, if you don't find one, find one below yourself until you do find one which your skills are suited for. I still know people who take this route, and it genuinely looks better in an interview to do so because it shows real work ethic.

But it's quickly falling away from "the norm". The shift I've seen among peers and folks I've known since high school is now to look for a job, and if you can't find one in a few months, join up with Occupiers and demand people who wear suits give you money. I wish I was lying and making this up, but this is what these people actually do now. It's embarrassing to be associated with them. The study a few months back that came up here on the fact that recent graduates wouldn't take jobs without Facebook access made me want to punch all the things. A lot of these people make themselves unemployable, and they have themselves to blame for that.

On the other hand, these are the "new poor" kids who's parents have cut them off (possibly because they're even more embarrassed by their kids than I am). These aren't the folks in their 30's and 40's, trying to support themselves and their families working hard for low pay. There's plenty of bootstrappers out there who try their damnedest and will never get to where they want to be. It's a sad fact of life, but it's been that way since we came out of the caves.
 
2012-02-10 09:58:21 AM
hurdboy: there's tons of strawmen to burn?!?!

GORDON: Can't spank because it might hurt a kids self esteem.

Can't encourage monogamy because kids are going to fark anyway.

Can't suggest waiting until marriage to have sex because that's just archaic.

So we end up with teen mothers with no education, no money, and no prospects. We end up with kids with single parent homes and young, stressed out, uneducated mothers, who go on to perpetuate the cycle and join OCCUPY! campouts because they can't figure out who farked them up so we MIGHT AS WELL BLAME PEOPLE WHO SUCCEEDED.

But nah, blame people who try to slow down the USS Progressive from crashing into the rocks.


Wow, Hurdboy was right!
 
2012-02-10 10:00:37 AM
So the takeaway from this is that all self-identified "conservatives" in the US are willfully ignorant cowards who wouldn't know how to take responsibility for their actions if their lives depended on it.

One of the ancillary benefits of Obama being elected is that it showed the entire world just how whiny, stupid, and pants-wettingly afraid of their own shadows our right-wingers are.
 
2012-02-10 10:02:09 AM
Conservatism is dead, only republicanism remains.
 
2012-02-10 10:02:49 AM
Bob16: Republican "responsibility" is "flexible".

They like their "responsibility" like they like their labor (wage slave) markets, don't they?
 
2012-02-10 10:03:34 AM
GORDON: Can't spank because it might hurt a kids self esteem.

Can't encourage monogamy because kids are going to fark anyway.

Can't suggest waiting until marriage to have sex because that's just archaic.

So we end up with teen mothers with no education, no money, and no prospects. We end up with kids with single parent homes and young, stressed out, uneducated mothers, who go on to perpetuate the cycle and join OCCUPY! campouts because they can't figure out who farked them up so we MIGHT AS WELL BLAME PEOPLE WHO SUCCEEDED.

But nah, blame people who try to slow down the USS Progressive from crashing into the rocks.


So let's restrict access to abortion and birth control and then not teach teens how to prevent pregnancy in the first place. That'll help things!

/this is what conservatives actually believe
 
2012-02-10 10:04:32 AM
AmazinTim: On the one hand, my generation is an embarrassment. The Occupiers aren't helping by a damn sight either. The norm used to be look for a job, if you don't find one, look harder, if you don't find one, find one below yourself until you do find one which your skills are suited for. I still know people who take this route, and it genuinely looks better in an interview to do so because it shows real work ethic.

I do agree, and have seen from a hiring manager point of view a bad streak of entitlement. However, these kids have been told their whole lives: "study hard, go to college... do you wanna flip burgers for a living? The debt is an investment in your future." And then what does the market offer them on that promise? Burger King applications. That has to be completely crushing to them but also the HS students and low-educated graduates that should be working at flipping burgers.

I honestly don't know what it is like for a lot of OWS types; I'm an engineer and all the young folks I work with are either engineers or tech support... the job market is always pretty good for us, and I had Navy connections to exploit when looking for jobs. But it takes a lot more than engineers to run the world.

The reality is no doubt somewhere between "the fat cats are intentionally f*cking everyone" and "just work harder! Pay no attention to my connections that got me here!"
 
2012-02-10 10:04:50 AM
GORDON: Can't spank because it might hurt a kids self esteem.

Not sure of the relevance to the subject.

Can't encourage monogamy because kids are going to fark anyway.

Newt?

Can't suggest waiting until marriage to have sex because that's just archaic.

Santorum's wife?

So we end up with teen mothers with no education, no money, and no prospects. We end up with kids with single parent homes and young, stressed out, uneducated mothers, who go on to perpetuate the cycle and join OCCUPY! campouts because they can't figure out who farked them up so we MIGHT AS WELL BLAME PEOPLE WHO SUCCEEDED.

Complete disregard for the facts.

But nah, blame people who try to slow down the USS Progressive from crashing into the rocks.

0.5/10
 
Displayed 50 of 185 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »