If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Think Progress) Strange New Hampshire Republicans propose bill to eliminate workers' lunch breaks. Bills requiring workers to kick puppies and root for Duke still in committee   (thinkprogress.org) divider line 61
More: Strange, New Hampshire, lunch break, Magna Carta, committees, workers  
•       •       •

2224 clicks; posted to Politics » on 09 Feb 2012 at 10:57 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



61 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-02-09 09:35:42 AM
What the HELL is the matter with these people?
 
2012-02-09 09:42:33 AM
Look, if businesses don't have the freedom to make poor business decisions, no matter how dangerous to society, short-sighted, or nominally supposed to reduce costs, then really, we might as well live in Russia.
 
2012-02-09 10:01:24 AM
Let's eliminate overtime and the 40 hour work week while we're at it. Make them work 7 days a week, unless they attend a company approved church on Sunday, of course.
 
2012-02-09 10:03:51 AM
Live free of food or die.
 
2012-02-09 10:15:44 AM
The bill's sponsor, state representative J.R. Hoell, argued that companies failing to provide lunch breaks would be shamed over social media, thus rendering the law unnecessary. "If they are not letting people have lunch, they could put it out though the news media, though social media. I don't think that abusive behavior would continue, the way communications are today," he said.

By that logic, we no longer need laws and should abolish all forms of government. Amen.

You're f*cking morans. You know that, right?
 
2012-02-09 10:16:05 AM
They're all just Snidley Whiplash villains at this point.
 
2012-02-09 10:19:38 AM
Problem: People need food to live.
Problem: Food costs money and takes time to eat -and is a waste of time to produce.

Make a law prohibiting eating.

Problem solved
 
2012-02-09 10:20:39 AM
Mentat: They're all just Snidley Whiplash villains at this point.

I prefer to think of them as Murky Dismal villains.
 
2012-02-09 10:30:13 AM
NewportBarGuy: By that logic, we no longer need laws and should abolish all forms of government. Amen.

You're f*cking morans. You know that, right?


Also, the sponsor seems to be calling his own bill unnecessary.
 
2012-02-09 10:30:41 AM
If the law doesn't matter, why is it necessary to remove it? Why spend time and money eliminating a law that won't matter in the long run? I assume the law is not actually hurting anything by being there. It's there on the off chance that companies choose to abuse their employees. By eliminating it, you're only succeeding in giving companies opportunities in abusing their employees. How will removing this law benefit, well, anyone!?

EXPLAIN YOURSELF, SIR!
 
2012-02-09 10:45:32 AM
Keep it up folks.

Do you know why unions came into being in the first place? It wasn't because the workers were being paid well, had medical coverage, and paid days off.

The American worker had to fight for those things. Had to fight an uphill fight, against organized industries, and the only way to combat the orchestration behind the scenes, from the Chamber of Commerce, to the State House and more, was to organize themselves.

Unions are a natural outgrowth of capitalism. In responsible industries, you work with the unions, and you come to agreement.

We didn't do that, not at first, and often still not today. The radicalism that we saw with the IWW and others was inspired by the literallly setting the dogs and hoses on workers who peacefully assembled.

You want that again? With a LOT higher a percentage of Americans owning guns? Really? You want to alienate a good quarter of the Republican base? Keep it up.

Unions aren't the enemy. Dumbasses and the greedy are the enemy, and to be fair, they're on BOTH sides of the desk...
 
2012-02-09 10:55:05 AM
Remember folks, unions are no longer needed, after all we have laws protecting workers...
 
2012-02-09 10:57:39 AM
Can we shame this asshole legislator over social media instead?
 
2012-02-09 11:01:29 AM
People wonder why I became a socialist.
 
2012-02-09 11:03:27 AM
It's unfortunate that there needs to be a law to ensure that workers get a lunch break.....Thanks Walmart, you evil bass-turd.
 
2012-02-09 11:04:36 AM
hubiestubert: Keep it up folks.

Do you know why unions came into being in the first place? It wasn't because the workers were being paid well, had medical coverage, and paid days off.

The American worker had to fight for those things. Had to fight an uphill fight, against organized industries, and the only way to combat the orchestration behind the scenes, from the Chamber of Commerce, to the State House and more, was to organize themselves.

Unions are a natural outgrowth of capitalism. In responsible industries, you work with the unions, and you come to agreement.

We didn't do that, not at first, and often still not today. The radicalism that we saw with the IWW and others was inspired by the literallly setting the dogs and hoses on workers who peacefully assembled.

You want that again? With a LOT higher a percentage of Americans owning guns? Really? You want to alienate a good quarter of the Republican base? Keep it up.

Unions aren't the enemy. Dumbasses and the greedy are the enemy, and to be fair, they're on BOTH sides of the desk...


Simply remove the right to peacefully assemble, and unions disappear. Well, more like are hunted down and murdered by the state military, but effectively the same

/citizens are a resource
//God gives us the right to exploit all resources
 
2012-02-09 11:04:58 AM
Proof that the average Republican politician is a knuckle-dragging retardo.
 
2012-02-09 11:04:59 AM
Yeah, employers STILL don't give employees the breaks the law requires them to give. In 2007, a guy successfully sued Kenneth Cole (new window)for back pay because the man repeatedly found himself unable to take a lunch break as was required by California law. In two-thousand-fricking-seven!

If they repeal this law, workers WILL be harmed.
 
2012-02-09 11:09:11 AM
Good. Now let's go for bathroom breaks. Do you know how much (otherwise productive) time people waste shaking their dicks and wiping their asses every day? Besides you can accommodate several desks and chairs on that space used inefficiently for bathrooms.
 
2012-02-09 11:09:58 AM
"If I was to deny one of my employees a break, I would be in a very bad position with the company's human resources representative.

That's because the guy in HR knows that the law requires you to give lunch breaks.
 
2012-02-09 11:11:43 AM
My state makes me sad sometimes...
 
2012-02-09 11:12:56 AM
New Hampshire's GOP legislature has come up with all manner of absurd bills recently, including a proposal making public school curriculum optional, another to prevent police from protecting domestic abuse victims, and even a measure mandating that new laws be based on the Magna Carta.

Is there some requirement in New Hampshire that GOP candidates be recruited from mental institutions?
 
2012-02-09 11:14:54 AM
there are 400 (yes, 400) members of the NH State House of Representatives. This and other proposed bills lately seem to be coming from the "well, I need to do something to keep my seat, let's try X". And at only $100 a year, it's not like they're doing it for the money - it's attention whoring, but from a public pulpit.

And to those AW's I give a hearty:

img.photobucket.com
 
2012-02-09 11:15:17 AM
This guy's a moran. If you take to the twitter to biatch that you were denied a break, congratulations, you just signed your own pink slip and good luck getting another job now that there's a public record of you being a shiat disturber.

It's like a sadistic twist on "you can sleep when you're dead": "you can eat when you're unemployed...until we take away your food stamps".
 
2012-02-09 11:17:17 AM
SilentStrider: What the HELL is the matter with these people?

A batch of 'free stater' republicans were elected in the last cycle on the basis of addressing unemployment. They aren't likely to retain their seats, even the bastions of loony conservatism are pointing out that they haven't done much if anything positive towards job creation.

There are plenty of New Hampshirites hanging their heads at stupid things like this, to include conservatives.

/displaced New Hampshirite
//plan on moving back though... hopefully it's fixed by then
 
2012-02-09 11:19:25 AM
Is New Hampshire the new Arizona?
 
2012-02-09 11:20:02 AM
Things (most) employers do anyway even though there are laws FORCING them to do it: Pay their employees. If there wasn't a law, surely they would "do it anyway".
 
2012-02-09 11:27:04 AM
I like the law that requires that all legislation related back to a provision in the Magna Carta.

"54. No one shall be arrested or imprisoned upon the appeal of a woman, for the death of any other than her husband."
 
2012-02-09 11:27:08 AM
Mike Chewbacca: Yeah, employers STILL don't give employees the breaks the law requires them to give. In 2007, a guy successfully sued Kenneth Cole (new window)for back pay because the man repeatedly found himself unable to take a lunch break as was required by California law. In two-thousand-fricking-seven!

If they repeal this law, workers WILL be harmed.


Will not the "free market" address such occurrences?
 
2012-02-09 11:31:26 AM
GoodyearPimp: Things (most) employers do anyway even though there are laws FORCING them to do it: Pay their employees. If there wasn't a law, surely they would "do it anyway".

One might think back to why these laws were enacted in the first place. Companies do the minimum and are rarely influenced by shame...
 
2012-02-09 11:31:48 AM
Dimensio: Mike Chewbacca: Yeah, employers STILL don't give employees the breaks the law requires them to give. In 2007, a guy successfully sued Kenneth Cole (new window)for back pay because the man repeatedly found himself unable to take a lunch break as was required by California law. In two-thousand-fricking-seven!

If they repeal this law, workers WILL be harmed.

Will not the "free market" address such occurrences?


People will be outraged until they realize prices went down because they don't need coverage for lunch.
 
2012-02-09 11:40:59 AM
It seems Republicans around the country are doing their best to make sure Democrats swing back into power in state legislatures.
 
2012-02-09 11:42:24 AM
Philip Francis Queeg: Can we shame this asshole legislator over social media instead?

Yes.
 
2012-02-09 11:44:02 AM
At this point, the modern GOP couldn't be more cartoon villainous even if they all sported black top hats and handlebar mustaches.
 
2012-02-09 11:45:47 AM
Aar1012: Dimensio: Mike Chewbacca: Yeah, employers STILL don't give employees the breaks the law requires them to give. In 2007, a guy successfully sued Kenneth Cole (new window)for back pay because the man repeatedly found himself unable to take a lunch break as was required by California law. In two-thousand-fricking-seven!

If they repeal this law, workers WILL be harmed.

Will not the "free market" address such occurrences?

People will be outraged until they realize prices went down because they don't need coverage for lunch.


The problem with your scenario is that prices will not go down.
 
2012-02-09 11:46:16 AM
www.thefreemanonline.org

DATELINE: YOUNG'S MEMORIAL CEMETERY, OYSTER BAY, NY

Here we see a picture of President Theodore Roosevelt clawing his way out of
his plot in Young's Memorial Cemetary. Eyewitnesses say he was heard to be
muttering something about having to 'smack a biatch' and was later seen looking
for a big stick.
 
2012-02-09 11:48:51 AM
nmemkha: At this point, the modern GOP couldn't be more cartoon villainous even if they all sported black top hats and handlebar mustaches.

Clearly, you haven't seen the new primary frontrunner, Maximilian Pennypacker, III.

www.cracked.com
 
2012-02-09 11:49:28 AM
indylaw: Proof that the average Republican politician is a knuckle-dragging retardo.

FTF sane people
 
2012-02-09 11:50:17 AM
nmemkha: Aar1012: Dimensio: Mike Chewbacca: Yeah, employers STILL don't give employees the breaks the law requires them to give. In 2007, a guy successfully sued Kenneth Cole (new window)for back pay because the man repeatedly found himself unable to take a lunch break as was required by California law. In two-thousand-fricking-seven!

If they repeal this law, workers WILL be harmed.

Will not the "free market" address such occurrences?

People will be outraged until they realize prices went down because they don't need coverage for lunch.

The problem with your scenario is that prices will not go down.


And the people who complain about their employers on social media will likely find themselves unemployed

.......forever????
 
2012-02-09 12:01:03 PM
NkThrasher: SilentStrider: What the HELL is the matter with these people?

A batch of 'free stater' republicans were elected in the last cycle on the basis of addressing unemployment. They aren't likely to retain their seats, even the bastions of loony conservatism are pointing out that they haven't done much if anything positive towards job creation.

There are plenty of New Hampshirites hanging their heads at stupid things like this, to include conservatives.

/displaced New Hampshirite
//plan on moving back though... hopefully it's fixed by then


Came here to point this out. The whole 'free stater' bullshiat is a part of a whackball movement to try to congregate all of the "free market," Randite, libertarian, RON PAUL, etc. leaning people in one state to maximize potential change.

New Hampshire is the state that pulled the smallest straw.
 
2012-02-09 12:03:13 PM
SilentStrider

What the HELL is the matter with these people?


Look, you've had a bunch of blowtards who've been screaming about the "evils of unions" for years (a lot of them are right here on Fark.) RonnieRaygun got that show goin', millions of American idjits got on the bandwagon. Collective bargaining rights are being legislated out, states are passing "right to work" laws. It's going to get a lot worse, kids. Full circle back to where we were 100 years ago.
 
2012-02-09 12:05:42 PM
"If I was to deny one of my employees a break, I would be in a very bad position with the company's human resources representative.

Of course, the company's human resources representative is also one of my employees, so he's pretty much gonna do whatever tell him, but still.
 
2012-02-09 12:24:43 PM
Dimensio: Mike Chewbacca: Yeah, employers STILL don't give employees the breaks the law requires them to give. In 2007, a guy successfully sued Kenneth Cole (new window)for back pay because the man repeatedly found himself unable to take a lunch break as was required by California law. In two-thousand-fricking-seven!

If they repeal this law, workers WILL be harmed.

Will not the "free market" address such occurrences?


Obviously not.
 
2012-02-09 12:26:24 PM
COPYPASTA TIME!!!


Ok, I like a good "LOL! REPUBLICAN FAIL!" thread as much as the next guy, but you really need to understand the NH political system. There are 400 State Representatives for a population of 1.3 million people, and they get paid $200 a year.

Really (new window)

There is ALWAYS some good derp to come out of the New Hampshire State Legislature, because it takes NOTHING to become a member of the Government.

I am SERIOUSLY considering making my dad run in 2012. He hates people, taxes, foreigners, the Yankees and those goddamn squirrels that keep chasing the birds away, and disproves of Tom Brady because he thinks he's too good at things.

He's 70 years old, and he does not know how to work computer.

He would be perfect.
 
2012-02-09 12:27:25 PM
Mike Chewbacca: Dimensio: Mike Chewbacca: Yeah, employers STILL don't give employees the breaks the law requires them to give. In 2007, a guy successfully sued Kenneth Cole (new window)for back pay because the man repeatedly found himself unable to take a lunch break as was required by California law. In two-thousand-fricking-seven!

If they repeal this law, workers WILL be harmed.

Will not the "free market" address such occurrences?

Obviously not.


Of course it will.

And it will say "I've got mine, fark you"
 
2012-02-09 12:40:40 PM
Who the f*ck actually elects these retards?
 
2012-02-09 12:50:58 PM
apoptotic: nmemkha: Aar1012: Dimensio: Mike Chewbacca: Yeah, employers STILL don't give employees the breaks the law requires them to give. In 2007, a guy successfully sued Kenneth Cole (new window)for back pay because the man repeatedly found himself unable to take a lunch break as was required by California law. In two-thousand-fricking-seven!

If they repeal this law, workers WILL be harmed.

Will not the "free market" address such occurrences?

People will be outraged until they realize prices went down because they don't need coverage for lunch.

The problem with your scenario is that prices will not go down.

And the people who complain about their employers on social media will likely find themselves unemployed

.......forever????


That would indeed be the best part.
 
2012-02-09 01:03:23 PM
Link (new window)

The family that derps together....
 
2012-02-09 01:07:51 PM
I suspect my former employer in Portsmouth, NH may be behind this bill...
 
2012-02-09 01:08:05 PM
Part time employees who work 5 hrs at a time are required BY LAW to take a 30 min UNPAID lunch break.

Part time employees who work 4:59 at a time are NOT required by law to take the lunch break. It's an arbitrary line in the sand.

Why not change the law to read, "upon the worker's discretion"?

If I work 5:30, I've got to be at the building for 6hrs, because my boss sure as hell isn't going to pay for my lunch at the end of the shift and let me leave early (corporate policy), but he sees my side of the situation and shrugs.
 
Displayed 50 of 61 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »