If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy) Silly Chicago Tribune pulls "Doonesbury" strip for being too edgy and political. Oh wait, it just mentioned a charity that helps public schools   (dailycartoonist.com) divider line 45
More: Silly, Doonesbury, Chicago Tribune, Garry Trudeau, charity  
•       •       •

5232 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 08 Feb 2012 at 7:41 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



45 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2012-02-08 02:26:31 PM
Knowing the Drib, they'll eventually replace Doonesbury with another unfunny right-wing comic.

/the Boondocks and Candorville were judged too edgy for the comics a few years back
 
2012-02-08 02:37:20 PM
Promoting a charity is offensive??

They used to censor Doonesbury when it was really controversial...this strip from 1973 was banned by many newspapers:

2.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-02-08 02:50:09 PM
So, the Trib got butthurt because someone suggested we help teachers? That's pretty predictable.
 
2012-02-08 04:01:05 PM
If that's too edgy and political for you, you may be a candyass.
 
2012-02-08 04:03:47 PM
yup lets not support schools and keep kids stupid.

Actually I'm okay with this because it will mean I can sell a lot of stupid, cheap crap to a lot of stupid people for lots of money.
 
2012-02-08 04:04:41 PM
Saborlas: If that's too edgy and political for you, you may be a candyass.

QFT.
 
2012-02-08 04:19:11 PM
So they pulled their funding for something they have long found distasteful on a flimsy technicality? Looks like Karen Handel wasted no time finding a new gig.
 
2012-02-08 04:32:17 PM
"The Tribune's editorial practices do not allow individuals to promote their self-interests."

Technically it wasn't his self interest but rather a public interest -so there's that.
 
2012-02-08 04:35:06 PM
Funky Winkerbean set up its own breast cancer charity, if I remember right. Lisa's fund or something like that. The storyline went on for like years. Wonder if the Trib pulled those strips.
 
2012-02-08 04:36:09 PM
They all need a big Mike Royko cawk punch over there.
 
2012-02-08 04:36:37 PM
donors choose is one of the few charities i regularly support. i have a few teacher friends scattered around the country, and it's nice to know that i can directly contribute to their classrooms.
 
2012-02-08 04:59:04 PM
Eh, I can understand the paper not wanting them advertising, even if they're advertising a non-profit.
 
2012-02-08 05:25:58 PM
Huh. Wonder how often they pull "Mallard Fillmore" for "expressing a personal interest?" It's not like he was pocketing the money, you assholes.

Clearly, the Trib doesn't understand how political cartoons work.
 
2012-02-08 05:32:09 PM
If a newspaper is paying you for content, you don't get to resell the space and profit twice.

But me no buts about how "it's all for charity!" -- if Trudeau wants to support a cause, he can purchase ad space like any other person. If he wants to donate the use of his intellectual property for the ad, like his cartoon characters, that's his choice.
 
2012-02-08 05:42:23 PM
kronicfeld: Eh, I can understand the paper not wanting them advertising, even if they're advertising a non-profit.

Basically they are paying him so he can advertise something. Yeah, I can see them not liking that, but they could have just gave him a warning.
 
2012-02-08 06:26:52 PM
gerrymander: If a newspaper is paying you for content, you don't get to resell the space and profit twice.

But me no buts about how "it's all for charity!" -- if Trudeau wants to support a cause, he can purchase ad space like any other person. If he wants to donate the use of his intellectual property for the ad, like his cartoon characters, that's his choice.


Except he didn't get paid for it. So it's not re-selling. And most comics at one time or another have supported non-profit groups and causes.

Still not surprising for the CTrib, a traditionally right wing rag. They were against FDR and were pro Nazi.
 
2012-02-08 06:59:10 PM
Darth_Lukecash: Still not surprising for the CTrib, a traditionally right wing rag

Yes, they're so horribly right-wing that they run Doonesbury in the first place.
 
2012-02-08 07:48:55 PM
You know you're old if you remember when Doonsebury was a good comic strip.
 
2012-02-08 07:49:59 PM
kronicfeld: Yes, they're so horribly right-wing that they run Doonesbury in the first place.

Do they run it on the op-ed page or the comics page?
 
2012-02-08 07:54:34 PM
The comics page...next to Prickly City just for "balance." You know, balanced in the Fox News fair and balanced way.
 
2012-02-08 08:38:44 PM
I thought this was over. I found the series last week to be funny with the addition of the QR Code.
 
2012-02-08 08:49:35 PM
The trib is pretty anti teacher, so this is not surprising.
 
2012-02-08 09:07:35 PM
The Tribune has high standards of accuracy and professionalism to maintain:
www.onlineorganizing.com
 
2012-02-08 09:17:32 PM
That's okay, they've got a whole new generation of suck to replace it with.

cdn.svcs.c2.uclick.com

Die, Lalo. Die screaming, buring, and penless. You talentless fark.
 
2012-02-08 09:39:01 PM
The Trib is not your personal army

/ Meh maybe they're dicks and maybe they're being consistent or not I have no idea and the funny pages are not a big concern for me
// Doonesbury fan for decades
 
2012-02-08 09:44:03 PM
Confabulat: Funky Winkerbean set up its own breast cancer charity, if I remember right. Lisa's fund or something like that. The storyline went on for like years. Wonder if the Trib pulled those strips.

The Tribune never carried Funky Winkerbean.
 
2012-02-08 09:57:37 PM
Since Doonesbury runs on its own website, the strip which includes the URL is constantly promoting the author's self-interest. Because readers can find any strip that a paper refuses to run, newspaper publishers accomplish nothing but a revelation of their own interests.
 
2012-02-08 10:05:50 PM
My niece teaches, and a grant from Donor's Choice help off-set the cost of her class room bunny. Sure, she's still paying most of the cost out-of-pocket (the housing, feeders, and the bunny), but kind donor sent her enough money to feed the bunny for the rest of the year. One of the girls in her class has Asperger's syndrome. The previous year, this little girl used to go into a corner of the classroom and just curl into a little ball. But, when my niece brought the bunny into the class room, the little girl ran up to my niece, looked her in the eye and said, "Please, can I take care of the bunny some weekend?" The girl is interacting better, and her parents say she's much more lively when ever the bunny comes to visit.
 
2012-02-08 10:31:13 PM
What comics are featured on the Tribunes Funnies Page?
 
2012-02-08 10:46:40 PM
The Trib's funnies page have lost their luster a long time ago for me. I still like a few of the strips on there but the Sun Times is a much better paper in my opinion; the very least for showing Pearl's before swine. Lately the Trib has gotten as bad as the WSJ for being a right wing rag.
 
2012-02-08 11:16:40 PM
Because People in power are Stupid: Technically it wasn't his self interest but rather a public interest -so there's that.

Especially the "administrative overhead".
 
2012-02-08 11:32:20 PM
Just another example of the rampant conservative media bias present in today's lamestream mainstream MSM media.
 
2012-02-08 11:53:47 PM
Charity? *gasp* The NERVE of some people!
 
2012-02-08 11:57:10 PM
West_Side_Charlie: Confabulat: Funky Winkerbean set up its own breast cancer charity, if I remember right. Lisa's fund or something like that. The storyline went on for like years. Wonder if the Trib pulled those strips.

The Tribune never carried Funky Winkerbean.


And it doesn't run on the editorial page anyway.
 
2012-02-09 01:51:08 AM
Aren't editorials basically nothing but promotion of your self-interests?
 
2012-02-09 08:15:24 AM
Confabulat: Funky Winkerbean set up its own breast cancer charity, if I remember right. Lisa's fund or something like that. The storyline went on for like years. Wonder if the Trib pulled those strips.

Was that before or after the incest storyline?
 
2012-02-09 09:02:50 AM
rjakobi: Confabulat: Funky Winkerbean set up its own breast cancer charity, if I remember right. Lisa's fund or something like that. The storyline went on for like years. Wonder if the Trib pulled those strips.

Was that before or after the incest storyline?


The incest story line was on Cathy, wasn't it?
 
2012-02-09 09:22:50 AM
They are simply pissed that a charity might get free advertising, instead of paying off the paper to be able to promote their charity.
 
2012-02-09 09:46:33 AM
Personally, I'd rather he make with the funny, but pulling it seems a bit much.
 
2012-02-09 10:28:09 AM
I have read the Trib nearly every morning for 25 years. When my current subscription runs out, I will probably not renew it.

Doonesbury runs right next to a strip called "Prickly City," which offers nothing but tortured, semi-comprehensible right-wing derp every single day. It has NEVER been pulled. Not once.

Doonesbury gets pulled frequently. And don't get me started with the derp-fest that masquerades as an Op-Ed spread. There's only so much Jonah Goldberg a man can take, for fark's sake.

It's truly sad to see what has become of that paper in recent years. But... predictable.
 
2012-02-09 10:38:05 AM
I approve of not supporting ads in non-ad areas. I usually buy offbrand products for that very reason (or it's just cheaper in any case).
 
2012-02-09 01:25:49 PM
Wasilla Hillbilly: Personally, I'd rather he make with the funny, but pulling it seems a bit much.

Meh, it was one day's strip that was pretty much nothing but an ad.
 
2012-02-09 02:30:09 PM
Mr_Fabulous: Doonesbury gets pulled frequently. And don't get me started with the derp-fest that masquerades as an Op-Ed spread. There's only so much Jonah Goldberg a man can take, for fark's sake.

It's truly sad to see what has become of that paper in recent years. But... predictable.


It's not really any better at the Los Angeles Times, which is owned by the Tribune. We get the Doughy Pantload on the editorial pages along while such scum as Max "Go fight wars while I sit home and cheer you on" Boot get Op-Ed space too. The Times is a shell of its former self, it's really sad.

Damn you Chandler's for selling, damn. you.
 
2012-02-09 03:47:39 PM
As a former teacher, I think Donorschoose.org is a worthwhile organization to which to contribute.
 
2012-02-09 09:22:24 PM
img1.fark.net Chicago Tribune finally realizes that Doonesbury comic strip has political undertones
 
Displayed 45 of 45 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »